Re: Testing 4.1.3
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be uploaded > exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release would do. > > You do have the option, if building yourself, of generating an archive that > can be run without installing. > > > On 9/28/2016 1:30 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: >> >> Thanks, up and running. >> >> BTW, I noticed that it installed over my 4.1.2. >> I don't remember if the RCs used to install in lieu of the production >> version in the past but it may be surprising for some users. >> Shouldn't it be installed in parallel (with no desktop-integration)? >> More hassle but if it's for testing purpose, we can imagine that the >> user knows what to do. >> Just my 2 cents, it is not meant to add delays to change that. >> >> Hagar >> >> >> Le 27/09/2016 à 20:44, Keith N. McKenna a écrit : >>> >>> Hagar Delest wrote: Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds??? Not able to find any on the web site or even in the mail... Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for the RCs). Hagar Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit : > > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period >>> until we have a complete release candidate. >> >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows >> builds. > > grrr, I was to fast with my offer as I'm not available until Thursday. > I'll test the builds then if it's still early enough. > > Sorry > > Marcus For instance, I purged OpenOffice 4.1.2 directly from my shell, as: apt-get purge $(dpkg-query -l "*openoffice*" | grep "^ii" | cut -c 4-32) and installed OO 4.1.3 (< https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/en-US/ >) by un-tar'ring the archive (after SHA256SUM verification), changing to DEBS and: dpkg -i openoffice*deb Thus far, Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 has been performing well in AMD64 Debian Unstable (Sid) -- according to my habits. Thank you to builder of ApacheOO for Debian! Best Professional Regards. -- Jose R R http://metztli.it - Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS - from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
For those of us in Debian, remove/install ApacheOO is not too painful. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be uploaded > exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release would do. > > You do have the option, if building yourself, of generating an archive that > can be run without installing. > > > On 9/28/2016 1:30 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: >> >> Thanks, up and running. >> >> BTW, I noticed that it installed over my 4.1.2. >> I don't remember if the RCs used to install in lieu of the production >> version in the past but it may be surprising for some users. >> Shouldn't it be installed in parallel (with no desktop-integration)? >> More hassle but if it's for testing purpose, we can imagine that the >> user knows what to do. >> Just my 2 cents, it is not meant to add delays to change that. >> >> Hagar >> >> >> Le 27/09/2016 à 20:44, Keith N. McKenna a écrit : >>> >>> Hagar Delest wrote: Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds??? Not able to find any on the web site or even in the mail... Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for the RCs). Hagar Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit : > > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period >>> until we have a complete release candidate. >> >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows >> builds. > > grrr, I was to fast with my offer as I'm not available until Thursday. > I'll test the builds then if it's still early enough. > > Sorry > > Marcus > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >>> Hagar; >>> >>> Development builds are being made available at the following location: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ >>> Click on your language and all currently available installers and >>> language packs are available. ariaelch is still updating so if you do >>> not see what you need yet it may well be coming soon. Note these are >>> development builds only at this point, not Release Candidates. >>> >>> Regards >>> Keith >>> >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- Jose R R http://metztli.it - Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS - from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Re: Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice
To Whom It May Concern, Can you please re-enable the account susie...@yandex.com? We need to clean up as soon as possible. Please help me with this, and thank you. Regards, Katie. On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:00:50 -0700 Formsbirdswrote Hello, Thank for your kind response. We prefer to re-enable our account susie...@yandex.com. Since you are busy with the new revision release, We will clean up the templates by ourselves. Please just recover the account. Thank you very much! Regards, Katie Williams On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:54:16 -0700 Andrea Pescetti wrote On 24/09/2016 Dave Fisher wrote: > Someone of the DEV team may have access to templates and extensions sites which are hosted at sourceforge by agreement with the Apache OpenOffice PMC. > Can someone help? As I wrote to the dev list last month, a number of PMC members have access as moderators. So I think any of us (me included) can remove content. Still, we are wasting our time to help a self-admitted abuser get their templates removed since they discovered their voluntary abuse will penalize them in search engines. Wouldn't it make more sense if the account is re-enabled and they clean up after themselves? This could speed things up, since I won't have time to look into this before version 4.1.3 is released - possibly next week, but if they really are in a hurry they might want to take care of this themselves as soon as possible. Formbirds, if you prefer this option just tell us. Regards, Andrea.
Re: 4.1.3 building
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:45:02PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to > >QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. > > Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the best > solution. > > > If someone wants to > >build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so. > > I haven't done it yet, but it's likely I can upload and build them by Friday > night European time (if bandwidth allows). I'm more confident with Linux-64 > since I have plenty of machines where I can test it. But Linux-32 should > work too. If it helps to get things ready earlier, I can thus do Linux-32. > Just let me know. I started uploading the Linux 32-bit packages; Windows installers with newer VC redist come next. So the only thing missing is the source release tars and zip. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
On 28 Sep, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:15:06PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. >> >> I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up >> >> a vm on the weekend. >> >> >> > >> > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on >> > Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? >> >> I haven't had any problems building trunk on Ubuntu 12 or 16. It's been >> a few weeks since I last tried, but I don't think anything significant >> has changed recently. > > This happens on the 32 bit Ubuntu buildot, with trunk and AOO413, on > Ubuntu 14: My Ubuntu 16 builds were 32 bit. I'll see if I can reproduce this once I have some available CPU cycles on my build machine, but it'll probably be several days. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.3 building
Marcus wrote: Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Possibly. But those files are generated during the build anyway, so the fact that RAT does not know about them is irrelevant. Sure, but the report is not green. But IMHO it should be green when we want to look at 4.1.3 as official release. At the end it's just an extended excludes list. RAT is a tool that we might even not want to use. The important thing is license compatibility, and we are OK on that aspect. Though, I suggest that you open an issue about this and nominate it as a 4.1.4 (not 4.1.3) blocker. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Bootstrap fails
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:15:06PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened > >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > >> I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > >> a vm on the weekend. > >> > > > > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on > > Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? > > I haven't had any problems building trunk on Ubuntu 12 or 16. It's been > a few weeks since I last tried, but I don't think anything significant > has changed recently. This happens on the 32 bit Ubuntu buildot, with trunk and AOO413, on Ubuntu 14: bb_slave5_ubuntu Ubuntu 14.04 32 bit https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-41x since https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/407/steps/build%20--all/logs/stdio Last completed build was on the old vm ==> /etc/lsb-release <== DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS" ==> /etc/os-release <== NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="12.04.5 LTS, Precise Pangolin" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu precise (12.04.5 LTS)" VERSION_ID="12.04" Linux bb-vm2 3.2.0-97-generic-pae #137-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 17 21:37:53 UTC 2015 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux see https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/404/steps/configure/logs/stdio The new vm: ==> /etc/lsb-release <== DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS" ==> /etc/os-release <== NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="14.04.5 LTS, Trusty Tahr" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS" VERSION_ID="14.04" https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/407/steps/configure/logs/stdio Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
Hello Aleksandr, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:00:09PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > > > > In theory, when linking the library. I opened > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > > I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > > a vm on the weekend. > > > > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on > Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? Not that I'm aware of; so yes, the build is broken on this Ubuntu system. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
On 28 Sep, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. >> I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up >> a vm on the weekend. >> > > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on > Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? I haven't had any problems building trunk on Ubuntu 12 or 16. It's been a few weeks since I last tried, but I don't think anything significant has changed recently. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Test planning for 4.1.3
Hi Patricia, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:51:40AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I am currently thinking about testing, and test result collection, for > 4.1.3. > > Is there an OpenOffice QA person in the house? > > If so, I would like to let you take charge of organizing testing, and just > provide some suggestions. There used to be some formal QA, including test link instance a https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Testlink that seems to be up and running at http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lostPassword.php You may find some QA information on the cwiki too. These all was driven forward by the former IBM Symphony QA members, so I guess these is all abandoned now, Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
4.1.3_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127140] Installer includes VC package older than 4.1.2
Patricia Shanahan has granted Pedro 's request for 4.1.3_release_blocker: Issue 127140: Installer includes VC package older than 4.1.2 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127140 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.3 building
Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 25/09/2016 Marcus wrote: Finally I got a AOO 4.1.3 with release options - but only en-US. I used the following varaible + value in the build script: ... LANG="de en-US fr pt ja" the language option seems to be a problem with the build script: Not OK: --with-lang="${LANGS}" OK: --with-lang="de en-US fr pt ja" Note that you have LANG and LANGS above, and that LANG happens to be set by the system in the shell in general. The script from SVN yes, sorry, just a typo. I've always used LANGS. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.3/ works well for me; if it doesn't for you we can check better, but of course the explicit list is equivalent. I've played with deleting the brackets {} or quotes "" but it doesn't helped. There must be something else that is special in my setup. Ratscan shows the following files without correct header: - main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set - main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set.sh - main/autom4te.cache/output.0 - main/autom4te.cache/requests - main/autom4te.cache/traces.0 - main/config.log - main/config.params - main/configure - main/warn Something to add to "main/rat-excludes"? Possibly. But those files are generated during the build anyway, so the fact that RAT does not know about them is irrelevant. Sure, but the report is not green. But IMHO it should be green when we want to look at 4.1.3 as official release. At the end it's just an extended excludes list. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be uploaded exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release would do. You do have the option, if building yourself, of generating an archive that can be run without installing. On 9/28/2016 1:30 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: Thanks, up and running. BTW, I noticed that it installed over my 4.1.2. I don't remember if the RCs used to install in lieu of the production version in the past but it may be surprising for some users. Shouldn't it be installed in parallel (with no desktop-integration)? More hassle but if it's for testing purpose, we can imagine that the user knows what to do. Just my 2 cents, it is not meant to add delays to change that. Hagar Le 27/09/2016 à 20:44, Keith N. McKenna a écrit : Hagar Delest wrote: Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds??? Not able to find any on the web site or even in the mail... Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for the RCs). Hagar Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit : Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds. grrr, I was to fast with my offer as I'm not available until Thursday. I'll test the builds then if it's still early enough. Sorry Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org Hagar; Development builds are being made available at the following location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ Click on your language and all currently available installers and language packs are available. ariaelch is still updating so if you do not see what you need yet it may well be coming soon. Note these are development builds only at this point, not Release Candidates. Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Orientation, part 2
Hi, I have read the second orientation page with no questions or comments. Mark Aldrich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Introduction
Hi, Well, I have finished reading through the section titled "Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice". There are a couple of things which I need to point out to the webpage editor. Section 5 starts with "A useful shortcut notation you will often see on the lists.", which makes sense if you read it as Yoda, but I think it would make more sense to change it to "You will often see useful shortcut notations on the lists." The other problem I noticed is in section 9.3., "Our Bugzilla database (sometimes called BZ) where we report and track status on bugs." has Bugzilla as a link, but the destination of the link is the "Intro..." page. Thanks for putting up with my nit-picking. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Thanks, up and running. BTW, I noticed that it installed over my 4.1.2. I don't remember if the RCs used to install in lieu of the production version in the past but it may be surprising for some users. Shouldn't it be installed in parallel (with no desktop-integration)? More hassle but if it's for testing purpose, we can imagine that the user knows what to do. Just my 2 cents, it is not meant to add delays to change that. Hagar Le 27/09/2016 à 20:44, Keith N. McKenna a écrit : Hagar Delest wrote: Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds??? Not able to find any on the web site or even in the mail... Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for the RCs). Hagar Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit : Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds. grrr, I was to fast with my offer as I'm not available until Thursday. I'll test the builds then if it's still early enough. Sorry Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org Hagar; Development builds are being made available at the following location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ Click on your language and all currently available installers and language packs are available. ariaelch is still updating so if you do not see what you need yet it may well be coming soon. Note these are development builds only at this point, not Release Candidates. Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting
R. Mark Aldrich wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Mark Aldrich and my user name on Confluence is darklarchrim. May I > have edit permission to add my name to the list of volunteers? > > Mark > Mark; Your User Name darklarchrim has been white-listed on Confluence Regards Keith N. McKenna signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[CWiki] Account Whitelisting
Hi, My name is Mark Aldrich and my user name on Confluence is darklarchrim. May I have edit permission to add my name to the list of volunteers? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Test planning for 4.1.3
I am currently thinking about testing, and test result collection, for 4.1.3. Is there an OpenOffice QA person in the house? If so, I would like to let you take charge of organizing testing, and just provide some suggestions. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.3 building
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the best solution. If someone wants to build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so. I haven't done it yet, but it's likely I can upload and build them by Friday night European time (if bandwidth allows). I'm more confident with Linux-64 since I have plenty of machines where I can test it. But Linux-32 should work too. If it helps to get things ready earlier, I can thus do Linux-32. Just let me know. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Bootstrap fails
Hello Ariel, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > In theory, when linking the library. I opened > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > a vm on the weekend. > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? Aleksandr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Github mirror (Re: Bootstrap fails)
Gavin McDonald wrote: From: Andrea Pescetti https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11601 How long has it been broken? I opened the above issue in April 2016. Has infra been asked to fix it? In the issue I say that the Github mirror is broken and I ask if there is a way to fix it. I consider this as a request to Infra to fix it. Github mirrors do get stuck and go stale on occasion, and an Infra Jira to ask them to unstick it on those occasions should work. OK thanks, I'll give it a try unless one can simply reopen the above. (If not then we ask to have it removed) OK. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Hello
Welcome. I used to go to Beaverton quite often when I was working for FPS and its successors. We are currently testing a 4.1.3 release candidate. You can download many different binaries from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ On 9/27/2016 5:04 PM, R. Mark Aldrich wrote: Hi, My name is Mark Aldrich and I am planning on offering my help with development. I live in Beaverton, Oregon, USA, a city just southwest of Portland. I think of myself as a software engineer because I have been writing code for over 40 years. In my spare time, I do woodworking. I am currently going through the first section of the Orientation Module. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Hello
Hello Mark, thank you for your offer and a heartly welcome. Regards Michael Duesseldorf, Rhine-Area, Germany Am 28.09.2016 um 02:04 schrieb R. Mark Aldrich: > Hi, > > My name is Mark Aldrich and I am planning on offering my help with > development. I live in Beaverton, Oregon, USA, a city just southwest of > Portland. I think of myself as a software engineer because I have been > writing code for over 40 years. In my spare time, I do woodworking. > > I am currently going through the first section of the Orientation Module. > > Mark > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature