Re: macOS Monterey
Hi all, If there are no objection until then, I will upgrade our M1 machine to macOS Monterey next week. We still have the other machine with macOS Catalina. Regards, Matthias Am 27.10.21 um 16:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Agreed > >> On Oct 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Pedro Lino >> wrote: >> >> Hi Matthias >> >> People who bought the M1 are those who want to have "the latest" so if they >> are about to upgrade, AOO should be ahead. >> My opinion is yes. >> In any case people with an M1 Apple are probably 0,0001% of AOO users, if >> any of them would use an old school Office suite... >> >> Regards, >> Pedro >> >>> On 10/26/2021 2:12 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Our Apple M1 (MacStadium) offers an upgrade to macOS 12 (Monterey). >>> >>> Do we want to test it? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: macOS Monterey
Hi Pedro, Am 26.10.21 um 15:38 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > People who bought the M1 are those who want to have "the latest" so if they > are about to upgrade, AOO should be ahead. > My opinion is yes. > In any case people with an M1 Apple are probably 0,0001% of AOO users, if any > of them would use an old school Office suite... Yes, the majority of our users are on Windows. I already tested AOO on Windows 11, and we should put more attention in that platform. Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Pedro > >> On 10/26/2021 2:12 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Our Apple M1 (MacStadium) offers an upgrade to macOS 12 (Monterey). >> >> Do we want to test it? >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
Hi all, Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit version we can build AOO41X with. I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64. Can we have a look at it? Regards, Matthias Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Pedro, > > This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with > Cygwin 64-bit. > > AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with > Cygwin64. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Matthias >> >> I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for this >> Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds but >> because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS) >> This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of a >> 32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported) >> >> Regards, >> Pedro >> >> >>> On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or >>> get out AOO42X. >>> >>> Whatever comes first... ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> Weitergeleitete Nachricht >>> Betreff:[HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit >>> support >>> Datum: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200 >>> Von:Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce >>> mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com >>> Antwort an: cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com >>> An: cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com >>> Kopie (CC): Corinna Vinschen >>> mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com >>> >>> >>> [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally. >>> Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please >>> reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or comments] >>> >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting >>> Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. >>> >>> The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the >>> last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server 2008 >>> R2, and Windows Server 2012. >>> >>> We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin in >>> 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package >>> maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're >>> still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the next >>> couple of months. >>> >>> >>> Corinna >>> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
Hi Matthias Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people who can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x? I assume Cygwin 3.3.0 will be supported for some time, so we should use that time to focus on 4.2.x? Regards, Pedro > On 10/28/2021 1:57 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit > version we can build AOO41X with. > > I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make > AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64. > > Can we have a look at it? > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Pedro, > > > > This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with > > Cygwin 64-bit. > > > > AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with > > Cygwin64. > > > > Regards, > > > > Matthias > > > > Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >> Hi Matthias > >> > >> I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for > >> this Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds > >> but because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS) > >> This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of > >> a 32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported) > >> > >> Regards, > >> Pedro > >> > >> > >>> On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or > >>> get out AOO42X. > >>> > >>> Whatever comes first... ;-) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>>Matthias > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Weitergeleitete Nachricht > >>> Betreff: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit > >>> support > >>> Datum:Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200 > >>> Von: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce > >>> mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com > >>> Antwort an: cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com > >>> An: cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com > >>> Kopie (CC): Corinna Vinschen > >>> mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com > >>> > >>> > >>> [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally. > >>> Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please > >>> reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or comments] > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> > >>> The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting > >>> Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. > >>> > >>> The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the > >>> last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server > >>> 2008 > >>> R2, and Windows Server 2012. > >>> > >>> We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin > >>> in > >>> 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package > >>> maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're > >>> still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the > >>> next > >>> couple of months. > >>> > >>> > >>> Corinna > >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
Hi Pedro, Am 28.10.21 um 15:06 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people who > can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x? Of course that would be better, but then we should start to fix the years old release blocker. I am +1 for releasing 4.2.0 when it is ready. > > I assume Cygwin 3.3.0 will be supported for some time, so we should use that > time to focus on 4.2.x? It will be the last version supported for 32-bit. Of course we can build as along as it breaks... ;-) Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Pedro > >> On 10/28/2021 1:57 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit >> version we can build AOO41X with. >> >> I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make >> AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64. >> >> Can we have a look at it? >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with >>> Cygwin 64-bit. >>> >>> AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with >>> Cygwin64. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: Hi Matthias I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for this Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds but because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS) This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of a 32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported) Regards, Pedro > On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or > get out AOO42X. > > Whatever comes first... ;-) > > Regards, > >Matthias > > > > Weitergeleitete Nachricht > Betreff: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit > support > Datum:Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200 > Von: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce > mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com > Antwort an: cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com > An: cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com > Kopie (CC): Corinna Vinschen > mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com > > > [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally. > Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please > reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or comments] > > > Hi folks, > > > The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting > Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. > > The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the > last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server > 2008 > R2, and Windows Server 2012. > > We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin > in > 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package > maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're > still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the > next > couple of months. > > > Corinna > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
Hi all, one positive effect of Cygwin 3.3.0 seems to be that I can build with threads again! That saves me a lot of hours. I am building AOO42X right now... @Arrigo: Can you try AOO41X? Regards, Matthias Am 28.10.21 um 15:24 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 28.10.21 um 15:06 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Matthias >> >> Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people >> who can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x? > Of course that would be better, but then we should start to fix the > years old release blocker. > > I am +1 for releasing 4.2.0 when it is ready. > >> I assume Cygwin 3.3.0 will be supported for some time, so we should use that >> time to focus on 4.2.x? > It will be the last version supported for 32-bit. Of course we can build > as along as it breaks... ;-) > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> Regards, >> Pedro >> >>> On 10/28/2021 1:57 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit >>> version we can build AOO41X with. >>> >>> I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make >>> AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64. >>> >>> Can we have a look at it? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Pedro, This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with Cygwin 64-bit. AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with Cygwin64. Regards, Matthias Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for > this Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit > builds but because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS) > This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of > a 32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported) > > Regards, > Pedro > > >> On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or >> get out AOO42X. >> >> Whatever comes first... ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> >> >> Weitergeleitete Nachricht >> Betreff: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit >> support >> Datum: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200 >> Von: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce >> mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com >> Antwort an: cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com >> An: cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com >> Kopie (CC): Corinna Vinschen >> mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com >> >> >> [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally. >> Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please >> reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or >> comments] >> >> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting >> Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. >> >> The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the >> last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server >> 2008 >> R2, and Windows Server 2012. >> >> We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin >> in >> 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package >> maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're >> still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the >> next >> couple of months. >> >> >> Corinna >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Fwd: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
Hello Matthias, All, On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > one positive effect of Cygwin 3.3.0 seems to be that I can build with > threads again! That would be _very_ good! > That saves me a lot of hours. I am building AOO42X right now... > > @Arrigo: Can you try AOO41X? Only tomorrow evening... sorry. Best regards, -- Arrigo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
important file lost while typing on Apache
Dear Sir/Madam Good morning. I am writing a novel on Apache open word and suddenly the whole text of my manuscript vanished. I haven't deleted it. I have used all the means including your tutorials, restore the PC, etc unfortunately I was not able to restore or retrieve it. Kindly help me to restore my lost file as I am an old man and don't know much about computers and have worked hard. I have no back in my PC. Regards Rasheed Rambler , Karachi, Pakistan
Re: important file lost while typing on Apache
I am sorry to hear you are having trouble. This is not a good place to get user support because it is a mailing list for the product developers. Please post a question on the user forum at https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/ You will have to register as a member to post a question. Regards, Francis On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Rasheed Rambler wrote: > Dear Sir/Madam > Good morning. > > > I am writing a novel on Apache open word and suddenly the whole text of my > manuscript vanished. I haven't deleted it. I have used all the means > including your tutorials, restore the PC, etc unfortunately I was not able > to restore or retrieve it. > Kindly help me to restore my lost file as I am an old man and don't know > much about computers and have worked hard. I have no back in my PC. > > Regards > > Rasheed Rambler , > Karachi, Pakistan >
