Hi Pedro,

Am 28.10.21 um 15:06 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias
>
> Not wanting to disregard Damjan's effort, wouldn't it be better if people who 
> can fix issues would focus on 4.2.x?

Of course that would be better, but then we should start to fix the
years old release blocker.

I am +1 for releasing 4.2.0 when it is ready.

>
> I assume Cygwin 3.3.0 will be supported for some time, so we should use that 
> time to focus on 4.2.x?

It will be the last version supported for 32-bit. Of course we can build
as along as it breaks... ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>> On 10/28/2021 1:57 PM Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>>  
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Cygwin 3.3.0 will be available soon and it will be the last 32-bit
>> version we can build AOO41X with.
>>
>> I remember, that Damjan longer ago posted a list of commits to make
>> AOO41X buildable with Cygwin64.
>>
>> Can we have a look at it?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>> Am 27.10.21 um 18:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>
>>> This is not about a 64-bit version of AOO but about building AOO with
>>> Cygwin 64-bit.
>>>
>>> AOO41x needs Cygwin32 at the moment, trunk/AOO42X are already built with
>>> Cygwin64.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>    Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 27.10.21 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>> Hi Matthias
>>>>
>>>> I agree. Providing 64-bit Windows binaries must be the #1 priority for 
>>>> this Project (not because they are needed or better than the 32-bit builds 
>>>> but because they will not be supported by the compilers or the OS)
>>>> This will also solve the problem of having to suggest the installation of 
>>>> a 32-bit Java (which is also becoming unsupported)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Pedro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     On 10/27/2021 4:25 PM Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Looks like we need to get building AOO41X for Windows on Cygwin64 or 
>>>>> get out AOO42X.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Whatever comes first... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>        Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
>>>>>     Betreff:      [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit 
>>>>> support
>>>>>     Datum:        Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:57:45 +0200
>>>>>     Von:  Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce 
>>>>> <cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com> mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
>>>>>     Antwort an:   cyg...@cygwin.com mailto:cyg...@cygwin.com
>>>>>     An:   cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com mailto:cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com
>>>>>     Kopie (CC):   Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com> 
>>>>> mailto:corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     [I sent this announcement to the Cygwin mailing list accidentally.
>>>>>     Now sending it to cygwin-announce, too, to reach more people. Please
>>>>>     reply on the cygwin mailing list if you have any concerns or comments]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     The upcoming version 3.3.0 is the last version officially supporting
>>>>>     Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.
>>>>>
>>>>>     The next major release 3.4.0 will be released in 2022 and will be the
>>>>>     last one officially supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server 
>>>>> 2008
>>>>>     R2, and Windows Server 2012.
>>>>>
>>>>>     We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin 
>>>>> in
>>>>>     2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package
>>>>>     maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore. If you're
>>>>>     still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the 
>>>>> next
>>>>>     couple of months.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Corinna
>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to