Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On 21/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Strange, I got feed back that both archived tars were working fine (and indeed I've just downloaded it, and works fine). Did you verify the download, and check untar exit code? This kind of error on startup is usually due to a configuration manager error with a broken installation. Untar was OK, and the download was OK too. However, I've now tried the new snapshot (r1476029, archive build) and it launched without errors on the same system, so let's consider this solved. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On 16/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the archive. I tried Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz and it crashes for me with $ ./openoffice4/program/soffice terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' ./openoffice4/program/soffice: line 122: [...] (core dumped) $sd_prog/$sd_binary $@ If I change UserInstallation=$ORIGIN/../.openoffice/4 in bootstraprc (which is one of the steps I do when testing a new version, unrelated to the previous error) I get different errors, but still I don't manage to get the snapshot running. Yesterday I tried the latest CI build (more recent than this snapshot) and it was running fine. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 16/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the archive. I tried Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz and it crashes for me with $ ./openoffice4/program/soffice terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' ./openoffice4/program/soffice: line 122: [...] (core dumped) $sd_prog/$sd_binary $@ Strange, I got feed back that both archived tars were working fine (and indeed I've just downloaded it, and works fine). Did you verify the download, and check untar exit code? This kind of error on startup is usually due to a configuration manager error with a broken installation. If I change UserInstallation=$ORIGIN/../.openoffice/4 in bootstraprc there is no need to change that in archived tars, their AOO installation is self contained. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpdrzpPbKo0I.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
Juergen , Ariel and all, Thanks so much for your great work to have the 4.0 developer snapshot ready! According to the 4.0 planhttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Planning, the next step should be start the regression testing. While I checked the wiki and found many feature/enhancement items are still in open status. I think we need to check the status and update the wiki. For some of the items ( e.g. Interoperability Improvement, Gallery, Gradients, Pallette...) I think maybe we can close here, harvest the current achievements in 4.0, and leave further improvements in 4.1. And for some other items (e.g. Accessibility, Patch, Encryption UI), it looks like we can not contain them in 4.0, and I suggest to defer them out, and move to 4.1. Then QE team can make the regression test plan accordingly and start testing using the 4.0 developer snapshot. Any suggestion? - Shenfeng (Simon) 2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org Hi Ricardo, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: I tried a couple of times to download the ARC file but failed: kget complains that cannot check the integrity and in fact the checksums do not match. The rpm pack downloaded without problems. It seems there was a problem uploading that file (all the others pass gpg --verify), I uploaded it again, now it should be fine. Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On 4/17/13 10:13 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: Juergen , Ariel and all, Thanks so much for your great work to have the 4.0 developer snapshot ready! According to the 4.0 planhttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Planning, the next step should be start the regression testing. While I checked the wiki and found many feature/enhancement items are still in open status. I think we need to check the status and update the wiki. For some of the items ( e.g. Interoperability Improvement, Gallery, Gradients, Pallette...) I think maybe we can close here, harvest the current achievements in 4.0, and leave further improvements in 4.1. And for some other items (e.g. Accessibility, Patch, Encryption UI), it looks like we can not contain them in 4.0, and I suggest to defer them out, and move to 4.1. Then QE team can make the regression test plan accordingly and start testing using the 4.0 developer snapshot. Any suggestion? I agree that we can move these open items to a 4.1. Especially everything that is related to translation. Juergen - Shenfeng (Simon) 2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org Hi Ricardo, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: I tried a couple of times to download the ARC file but failed: kget complains that cannot check the integrity and in fact the checksums do not match. The rpm pack downloaded without problems. It seems there was a problem uploading that file (all the others pass gpg --verify), I uploaded it again, now it should be fine. Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On 4/15/13 4:38 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/15/13 4:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:56:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be reproduced. It seems that the result of the build bots are not reliable. Based on this and the fact that we don't have build bots for MacOS and currently not for Linunx 32 bit, I propose a weekly developer snapshot based on the SNAPSHOT tag. I have switched the snapshot tag now to trunk revision 1467923 and will start building Windows and MacOS @Ariel, maybe you can provide the Linux builds as in the past. Please let me know if not. Yes. What are you planning to build (normal install sets, languages, langpacks, etc.)? May be it doesn't make sense to provide localized full install sets, in the current localization state (we will only get the feedback that translation is corrupted and previous work lost - none of which is true). I agree, at the moment I would plan en-US only. And as soon as we have the localization for a language in place we can add the language. I think at the moment we should provide normal install sets with system integration, means no dev builds. QA volunteers know hopefully how to handle these builds. MacOS and Windows snapshot builds are uploaded. Keep in mind that it is a build with system integration. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:46:10AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: MacOS and Windows snapshot builds are uploaded. Keep in mind that it is a build with system integration. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the archive. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgp8Te9UpjkNB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On 4/16/13 3:59 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:46:10AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: MacOS and Windows snapshot builds are uploaded. Keep in mind that it is a build with system integration. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the archive. good idea, maybe I should upload the archive version for windows as well (next time) Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
2013/4/16 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:46:10AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: MacOS and Windows snapshot builds are uploaded. Keep in mind that it is a build with system integration. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the archive. I tried a couple of times to download the ARC file but failed: kget complains that cannot check the integrity and in fact the checksums do not match. The rpm pack downloaded without problems. Regards Ricardo Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
Hi Ricardo, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: I tried a couple of times to download the ARC file but failed: kget complains that cannot check the integrity and in fact the checksums do not match. The rpm pack downloaded without problems. It seems there was a problem uploading that file (all the others pass gpg --verify), I uploaded it again, now it should be fine. Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
Hi, I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be reproduced. It seems that the result of the build bots are not reliable. Based on this and the fact that we don't have build bots for MacOS and currently not for Linunx 32 bit, I propose a weekly developer snapshot based on the SNAPSHOT tag. I have switched the snapshot tag now to trunk revision 1467923 and will start building Windows and MacOS @Ariel, maybe you can provide the Linux builds as in the past. Please let me know if not. For the future we really have to work on a reliable build bot environment that can produce usable output. Currently it seems more a compile check. This means we have to fix the build problems for clean builds, improve the build performance and/or improve the system for incremental builds. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:56:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be reproduced. It seems that the result of the build bots are not reliable. Based on this and the fact that we don't have build bots for MacOS and currently not for Linunx 32 bit, I propose a weekly developer snapshot based on the SNAPSHOT tag. I have switched the snapshot tag now to trunk revision 1467923 and will start building Windows and MacOS @Ariel, maybe you can provide the Linux builds as in the past. Please let me know if not. Yes. What are you planning to build (normal install sets, languages, langpacks, etc.)? May be it doesn't make sense to provide localized full install sets, in the current localization state (we will only get the feedback that translation is corrupted and previous work lost - none of which is true). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgp8BLRYvKvjn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots
On 4/15/13 4:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:56:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be reproduced. It seems that the result of the build bots are not reliable. Based on this and the fact that we don't have build bots for MacOS and currently not for Linunx 32 bit, I propose a weekly developer snapshot based on the SNAPSHOT tag. I have switched the snapshot tag now to trunk revision 1467923 and will start building Windows and MacOS @Ariel, maybe you can provide the Linux builds as in the past. Please let me know if not. Yes. What are you planning to build (normal install sets, languages, langpacks, etc.)? May be it doesn't make sense to provide localized full install sets, in the current localization state (we will only get the feedback that translation is corrupted and previous work lost - none of which is true). I agree, at the moment I would plan en-US only. And as soon as we have the localization for a language in place we can add the language. I think at the moment we should provide normal install sets with system integration, means no dev builds. QA volunteers know hopefully how to handle these builds. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
