Re: Board report April: infrastructure wishlist

2013-03-11 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> The periodic report to the Apache Board about the status of the OpenOffice
> project and community is due in about one month. You can find an initial
> draft of the April report at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr
> but it is almost completely empty and not worth reading yet.
>
> Remember that we have rarely used it this way so far, but the Board report
> is also an occasion to officially notify the Apache Board about our needs:
> the Board can decide how to allocate resources, but they need our input for
> that.
>
> Seeing the many recent discussions about infrastructure (wiki, forum,
> buildbots, Pootle, domains, certificates...) I believe we should use the
> report to make a sort of "Infrastructure wishlist". The aim is to avoid
> annoying the Infrastructure staff and volunteers with requests; we should
> tell the Board what our priorities are, so that they can use these
> priorities in allocating resources.
>

But we should make sure we understand which items are truly an infra
resource issue versus which ones are blocked for other reasons.  For
example, the issue with signing certificates is not because of the
cost of a certificate.  It is blocked because we have not come up with
an acceptable process for handling and applying the code signing in a
way that satisfies Infra's security concerns.   I thought it was clear
that the first step to resolve this was to have our binary
distributions built completely on the buildbots, in their final form,
including all languages.  Once that is done then we could discuss more
about how to add code signing.

-Rob

> So, feel free to discuss the "Infrastructure wishlist" here and I will then
> include it in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr
> for consideration by the Apache Board (we will probably ask Infra to take a
> look too before sending).
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Board report April: infrastructure wishlist

2013-03-11 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/10/13 8:50 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 10. März 2013 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> Seeing the many recent discussions about infrastructure (wiki, forum,
>>> buildbots, Pootle, domains, certificates...) I believe we should use the
>>> report to make a sort of "Infrastructure wishlist". ...
>> how about the suggestion to buy a code signing certificate
> 
> Good idea. Let's really try to make a simple list of "What" and "Why".
> This should be considered as a wishlist and not a list of actions we
> demand: we tell the Board what could help in making our project more
> efficient (and we will likely ask Infra to comment on the list before we
> send it); the Board, while allocating resources, can use these
> suggestions (discussions about what budget to use may or may not be
> relevant, but a list of priorities would be fine for the time being).
> 
> So:
> 
> What: Buy a code signing certificate
> Why [please check!]: This would allow the project to digitally sign the
> convenience binaries it ships, and avoid Windows and Mac OS X warnings
> about unsigned installers.

The MacOSX part is not yet finally evaluated but we need either a valid
certificate and/or a Apple developer ID. The process itself has to be
evaluated.

> 
> What: Acquire a *.openoffice.org certificate
> Why: This would allow to avoid false alarms when enforcing HTTPS to
> browse OpenOffice sites, and give the possibility of secure login to
> wiki.openoffice.org and forum.openoffice.org
> 
> What: Allocate budget for additional domains
> Why: This would help in transferring legacy domains to Apache, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4906
> 
> What: Officially support MWiki [remember this is a wishlist!]
> Why: wiki.openoffice.org is an important service to our users, with over
> 15K [right?] pages and many [how many?] users. And we don't want to put
> an additional burden on Infra without getting additional resources for it.
> 
> What: Officially support phpBB
> Why: forum.openoffice.org is an important service to our users, with
> [numbers?]. And we don't want to put an additional burden on Infra
> without getting additional resources for it.
> 
> Anything else? Buildbots, Pootle?

Pootle: the hardware should be sufficient to work with the server and we
should have enough disk space for ~ 3 OpenOffice related projects. I am
thinking here about stable long term product lines that potentially get
more translations later or important fixes or changes.

Juergen


> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Board report April: infrastructure wishlist

2013-03-10 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Juergen Schmidt wrote:

Am Sonntag, 10. März 2013 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Seeing the many recent discussions about infrastructure (wiki, forum,
buildbots, Pootle, domains, certificates...) I believe we should use the
report to make a sort of "Infrastructure wishlist". ...

how about the suggestion to buy a code signing certificate


Good idea. Let's really try to make a simple list of "What" and "Why". 
This should be considered as a wishlist and not a list of actions we 
demand: we tell the Board what could help in making our project more 
efficient (and we will likely ask Infra to comment on the list before we 
send it); the Board, while allocating resources, can use these 
suggestions (discussions about what budget to use may or may not be 
relevant, but a list of priorities would be fine for the time being).


So:

What: Buy a code signing certificate
Why [please check!]: This would allow the project to digitally sign the 
convenience binaries it ships, and avoid Windows and Mac OS X warnings 
about unsigned installers.


What: Acquire a *.openoffice.org certificate
Why: This would allow to avoid false alarms when enforcing HTTPS to 
browse OpenOffice sites, and give the possibility of secure login to 
wiki.openoffice.org and forum.openoffice.org


What: Allocate budget for additional domains
Why: This would help in transferring legacy domains to Apache, see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4906


What: Officially support MWiki [remember this is a wishlist!]
Why: wiki.openoffice.org is an important service to our users, with over 
15K [right?] pages and many [how many?] users. And we don't want to put 
an additional burden on Infra without getting additional resources for it.


What: Officially support phpBB
Why: forum.openoffice.org is an important service to our users, with 
[numbers?]. And we don't want to put an additional burden on Infra 
without getting additional resources for it.


Anything else? Buildbots, Pootle?

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Board report April: infrastructure wishlist

2013-03-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Sonntag, 10. März 2013 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> The periodic report to the Apache Board about the status of the  
> OpenOffice project and community is due in about one month. You can find  
> an initial draft of the April report at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr
> but it is almost completely empty and not worth reading yet.
>  
> Remember that we have rarely used it this way so far, but the Board  
> report is also an occasion to officially notify the Apache Board about  
> our needs: the Board can decide how to allocate resources, but they need  
> our input for that.
>  
> Seeing the many recent discussions about infrastructure (wiki, forum,  
> buildbots, Pootle, domains, certificates...) I believe we should use the  
> report to make a sort of "Infrastructure wishlist". The aim is to avoid  
> annoying the Infrastructure staff and volunteers with requests; we  
> should tell the Board what our priorities are, so that they can use  
> these priorities in allocating resources.
>  
> So, feel free to discuss the "Infrastructure wishlist" here and I will  
> then include it in  
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr for  
> consideration by the Apache Board (we will probably ask Infra to take a  
> look too before sending).
>  
>  

how about the suggestion to buy a code signing certificate (they are typical 
valid for 2 years) from our still existing budget to bridge the time until we 
have ASF wide working and established signing process. My guessing is that it 
will take longer to agree on a general approach. But I will try to restart the 
discussion again...

Juergen  
>  
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>  
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>  
>  




Board report April: infrastructure wishlist

2013-03-09 Thread Andrea Pescetti
The periodic report to the Apache Board about the status of the 
OpenOffice project and community is due in about one month. You can find 
an initial draft of the April report at

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr
but it is almost completely empty and not worth reading yet.

Remember that we have rarely used it this way so far, but the Board 
report is also an occasion to officially notify the Apache Board about 
our needs: the Board can decide how to allocate resources, but they need 
our input for that.


Seeing the many recent discussions about infrastructure (wiki, forum, 
buildbots, Pootle, domains, certificates...) I believe we should use the 
report to make a sort of "Infrastructure wishlist". The aim is to avoid 
annoying the Infrastructure staff and volunteers with requests; we 
should tell the Board what our priorities are, so that they can use 
these priorities in allocating resources.


So, feel free to discuss the "Infrastructure wishlist" here and I will 
then include it in 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr for 
consideration by the Apache Board (we will probably ask Infra to take a 
look too before sending).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org