Re: openoffice|ooffice|office instead soffice?
Hi 2013/4/23 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org: It is a fact that soffice has been outdated for about 10 years. But previous discussions on the topics showed that, while it would be feasible to rename the alias, there are documented procedures that still rely on the name soffice when they must launch/connect to OpenOffice. I can't be more precise at the moment, but if you need further details I may dig a bit. Thanks Andrea and RGB. I think that the RGB's suggestion is the better approach for us after 4.0 release, including his suggestion to use aoo (very short!). ;-) Anyway, i see that is a consensus this question and that need attention soon. Regards, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: openoffice|ooffice|office instead soffice?
Claudio Filho wrote: I remember that some time ago started a discuss about the change of binary name soffice (and its others names - scalc, sdraw, etc) by other that not *s*office, and I not remember the final of this novel. It is a fact that soffice has been outdated for about 10 years. But previous discussions on the topics showed that, while it would be feasible to rename the alias, there are documented procedures that still rely on the name soffice when they must launch/connect to OpenOffice. I can't be more precise at the moment, but if you need further details I may dig a bit. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: openoffice|ooffice|office instead soffice?
2013/4/24 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org Claudio Filho wrote: I remember that some time ago started a discuss about the change of binary name soffice (and its others names - scalc, sdraw, etc) by other that not *s*office, and I not remember the final of this novel. It is a fact that soffice has been outdated for about 10 years. But previous discussions on the topics showed that, while it would be feasible to rename the alias, there are documented procedures that still rely on the name soffice when they must launch/connect to OpenOffice. I can't be more precise at the moment, but if you need further details I may dig a bit. If legacy procedures are the main problem, what about a transition period? If I understand it right, the aliases are just scripts that run the right binary, is it possible to have more than one alias? If yes, let's say that during 4.x life cycle we have soffice AND aoo, both launching the program, and then on 5.0 we drop soffice. Does something like that makes sense or is just more a trouble than a solution? Regards Ricardo Regards, Andrea. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: openoffice|ooffice|office instead soffice?
2013/4/23 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com: Hi Hi. I remember that some time ago started a discuss about the change of binary name soffice (and its others names - scalc, sdraw, etc) by other that not *s*office, and I not remember the final of this novel. +1 Is possible? IMO, i (as newbie) haven't idea. Is interesting? IMHO, is necessary! IMHO, I also think necessary this change. Albino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
