[dev] Calc - Controls - Attachement cell - Ooo Basic - API
Hello, I am look how to, in a macro called by a button, to get the button attachement cell. The goal is to get information in cells relative to the button in order to change le macro functionnality. Is this possible ?, with Basic ?, with UNO API ?. Thank's for your help. Regards, -- Paul Veuve [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- CDI CONSEILS ET DEVELOPPEMENTS INDUSTRIELS SA Chemin de la Justice 15 CH-2000 NEUCHATEL -- http://www.cdisa.ch Phone (+41 32) 733 31 31 or (+41 78) 600 31 31 Fax (+41 32) 733 31 32 -- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date: 21.12.2006 18:45 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] compile error on Solaris 10
I am attempting to build Openoffice with all debug symbols and am getting an compiler/include file error: -- = Building project python = /jreid/OOO/OOC680_m7/python dmake: Executing shell macro: +-which cc dmake: Executing shell macro: pwd dmake: Executing shell macro: pwd dmake: Executing shell macro: pwd - mkdir ./unxsols4/misc/build/Python-2.3.4/ mkdir: Failed to make directory "unxsols4/misc/build/Python-2.3.4/"; File exists dmake: Executing shell macro: pwd cd ./unxsols4/misc/build/Python-2.3.4/ && gmake -j1 ; gmake install ; chmod -R g+w /jreid/OOO/OOC680_m7/python/unxsols4/misc/build/python-inst && touch so_built_so_python /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -c -DNDEBUG -O -I. -I./Include -KPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Modules/python.o Modules/python.c "./Include/Python.h", line 21: #error: "limits.h is required by std C -- why isn't HAVE_LIMITS_H defined?" cc: acomp failed for Modules/python.c gmake: *** [Modules/python.o] Error 2 -- Any pointers at all would be helpful. -- Joe Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tactical Solaris Systems Engineering and Administration http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] External header guards (was: In the Works: New OOo C++ Coding Standards)
Hi Thosten, On Tuesday 19 December 2006 21:40, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > you wrote: > > I hate them that much that I am willing to do a script that would do > > the removal ;-) > > > > What is the platform/compiler that probably needs this, please? Any > > volunteer to do a comparison of the "with" and "without" compilation > > times? > > That would be msvc 7.1 > > Go ahead with the script (I'd take that anyway, once we switch to 8.0) > - I can do the timings. So - everything is ready ;-) http://www.go-oo.org/ooo-build/bin/strip-guards is the script to run over your sources (give it path to them as a parameter). http://www.go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/src680/strip-guards-additions.diff is a patch to be applied over that (ooe680-m6), and finally http://www.go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/src680/fast-mkdepend.diff is a fix for the mkdepend slowness with sources that do not have the external guards. (BTW, makedepend is an unbelievable piece of software ;-) It's optimized for everything - but for what it should be optimized for. This patch should fix that, it cuts thousands [maybe millions?] of unnecessary descents through the structure to find that the symbol is really not defined [+ a better structure for holding the symbols].) Please test - I'm eager to see the results with msvc ;-) Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year! Thank you, Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Can I dispatch URLs from the command line?
Matthias B. wrote: I've tried without success to dispatch URLs for a custom URL-scheme supported by a custom component via the command line, i.e with the command soffice This works fine for http:-URLs and private: URLs as well as file: URLs, but not for my custom URLs. Is it at all possible to dispatch custom URLs via the command line? Hi Matthias, The current implementation doesn't support a custom URL-scheme. You can write me an "request for enhancement", please set the owner of the task to "cd". Regards, Carsten -- Carsten Driesner (cd) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Framework Framework wiki: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Framework OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional?
Hi stephan, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : [Laurent's response mail somehow got lost for me, so I respond via cut/paste from the archives.] "will old .zip packages stil be deployabale with unopkg (i think so) ?" Yes, of course; this does not affect unopkg. "I suggest writting a message telling to use unopkg explicitelly, ..." pkgchk already does that (for quite some time now). So it is ok for me :) Laurent -- Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org - http://www.indesko.com Nuxeo Enterprise Content Management >> http://www.nuxeo.com - http://www.nuxeo.org Livre "Programmation OpenOffice.org", Eyrolles 2004-2006 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Can I dispatch URLs from the command line?
I've tried without success to dispatch URLs for a custom URL-scheme supported by a custom component via the command line, i.e with the command soffice This works fine for http:-URLs and private: URLs as well as file: URLs, but not for my custom URLs. Is it at all possible to dispatch custom URLs via the command line? Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional?
[Laurent's response mail somehow got lost for me, so I respond via cut/paste from the archives.] "will old .zip packages stil be deployabale with unopkg (i think so) ?" Yes, of course; this does not affect unopkg. "I suggest writting a message telling to use unopkg explicitelly, ..." pkgchk already does that (for quite some time now). -Stephan Original Message Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:58:31 +0100 From: Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: [dev] Making deprecated pkgchk nonfunctional? Hi stephan > pkgchk is a deprecated command line tool bundled with OOo (at least > deprecated since OOo 2.0, and clearly saying so on every invocation) for > which unopkg is the functionally superior replacement (available for a > long time now, even before OOo 2.0). > will old .zip packages stil be deployabale with unopkg (i think so) ? > Would anybody have problems changing pkgchk in OOo 2.2 so that it just > does exit(EXIT_FAILURE)? (Completely dropping it from OOo 2.2 would not > work with the StarOffice update feature. Dropping it would still have > to wait until OOo 3.) Let me know if you have any concerns, otherwise I > will go ahead. > I suggest writting a message telling to use unopkg explicitelly, otherwise some user may be lost (english onlyis fine, i think as it is a command line tool) Laurent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]