[dev] writer: export pages as bitmaps (e.g. PNG)

[Laurent Denoue]

Hello,
Is there an API to export each page of a Writer document as a picture?
It's possible under Impress, as shown here:
http://www.oesf.org/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t7790.html

Thanks,
Laurent.

Re: [dev] XTextRange Diff

[Daniel Beck]

Hello,

I remember that I had once a similar problem. I solved it by creating a 
XTextRange ranging from "start" to "end" and then by getting the size of 
the text of that XTextRange.


Here some pseudo code (I cannot post real code since I have no Java 
environment here)


//Creates the XTextRange ranging from start to end
xtextRange.goto(START)
xtextRange.goto(END)

//Returns the size of the XTextRange in number of characters:
xtextRange.getText().getString().length();


I'm not sure if the returned size does match the number of characters 
under the windows OS if a line break happens to be in that XTextRange. A 
trick like this should solve the problem:


String text =xtextRange.getText().getString().length();
if (System.getProperty("os.name").startsWith("Windows"))
text = text.replaceAll(System.getProperty("line.separator"), "\n");
return text.length()


I sadly found no easier way to count characters in a XTextRange.

Regards,
Daniel






Hello Guys !!!


I need some help... i have two XTextRange ... the Start and The END... 
exist way to return a position in the of this ranges ?


ex:

XTextRangeEND - XTextRangeSTART = 13

The Range have a 13 chars...

exists way ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] How to describe an "invalid" css.util.DateTime value

[Mathias Bauer]

Niklas Nebel wrote:

> Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> The whole magic behind that is that 01-01-1601 is taken as an invalid
>> date. I don't know why this date was chosen but perhaps somebody else
>> can shed some light on this.
> 
> January 1, 1601 is the base of Windows file time, as used in OLE 
> SummaryInformation.

Ah, thanks. That's the good thing in being on a mailing list. You can
learn something new every day. :-)

So it makes sense to use this define when importing OLE
SummaryInformation. The question remains how we should handle this in
the rest of the code.

We could either use the same approach for css.util.DateTime also but
then we should document it in the IDL file. Or we should remove the
define for an invalid timestamp and instead use a static IsInvalid()
function that checks for both values (the OLE one as well as the "void"
case for css.util.DateTime). I don't believe that using a TimeStamp with
nDate=0L (that's what we get when we convert a "void" css.util.Datew to
a "tools" Date) can be anything else than an invalid Date.

I would prefer the second way as using gthe Windows file time in our IDL
looks a bit strange.

In case noone objects I will create an issue to change this as described.

Ciao,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Adding support for overlined text in Writer

[Martin Whitaker]

Hello Frank,

Frank Meies - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer wrote:

Hi Martin,

On 03/06/07 02:11, Martin Whitaker wrote:


[cut]

A way of significantly reducing the quantity of changes required would
be to change the definition of the enumeration type FontUnderline so
that it could represent all possible combinations of underline and
overline style (i.e. store the underline and overline styles as two
separate bit fields within a FontUnderline value). So the question is,
which would be more acceptable - a patch that changed many files and
classes, or a patch that contains fewer changes, but is a bit of a
kludge?


I think the patch that changes many files and classes is the way to go
here. You would have to start creating a new SvxOverlineItem, analogous
to the SvxUnderlineItem.


OK, that was my preference too.



Finally, I am currently developing my patches against the 680_m6
(version 2.1.0) snapshot. What tag point should I be using?


I would suggest to move to a more current SRC680 milestone (205 is the
latest right now) to avoid conflicts during integration. I can also 
offer to create a cws for you.



I was expecting to submit the patches via IssueZilla as this will be
my first contribution. If you would prefer me to work in a cws, let me
know, otherwise I will continue developing against the latest stable
milestone.


Please sent any further questions to the Writer mailing list
(dev@sw.openoffice.org).


Will do - although I guess these changes are going to have an impact
outside the Writer project.

Best regards,

Martin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] XTextRange Diff

[Dyego Souza Dantas Leal]

Hello Guys !!!


I need some help... i have two XTextRange ... the Start and The END... 
exist way to return a position in the of this ranges ?


ex:

XTextRangeEND - XTextRangeSTART = 13

The Range have a 13 chars...

exists way ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] Detect a Paragraph Size

[Dyego Souza Dantas Leal]

I need to detect a size of paragraph (word count of paragraph) , how ?

somebody ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] Sharing packages across products

[Stephan Bergmann]

Following up on my packaging blog entry at 
, today I want to 
concentrate on the details of sharing packages across products:  OOo is 
conceptionally built on top of URE, so it would make sense to split OOo 
into URE plus current OOo's top half.  Derivatives like Sun's StarOffice 
and StarSuite, or Brasilian BrOffice share many parts with plain OOo, so 
it would make sense to split those into a common OOo core plus plain OOo 
finish, StarOffice finish, StarSuite finish, BrOffice finish.  And so on.


There are generally two approaches to achieve that:  You start with a 
given product P that is today installed at a specific file system 
location L (e.g., OOo 2.2 by default goes to a tree rooted at 
/opt/openoffice.org2.2 on Unix).  Now, when you split product P into two 
parts P1 and P2, you can either install P1 to a file system location L1 
and P2 to a different location L2, and make sure that your product's 
code can cope with that distribution, or install P1 and P2 to a common 
file system location L, and your product's code is effectively run in 
the same environment it is running in today.  Which approach is better?


Advantages of the two-tree approach (P = P1 + P2 spread across L1 and L2):

- Packages can be reused across products.  Typical package formats 
(Linux rpm, Solaris packages, Windows msi, etc.) contain (default) file 
system locations where the package content will be installed.  If both 
OOo and StarOffice expect the core packages at, say, 
/opt/openoffice-core, the exact same packages can be used for the core 
part of both OOo and StarOffice.  This saves resources for both the 
supplier of multiple products and the consumer of multiple products 
(e.g., installing both URE and OOo on a machine would not install any 
duplicate files under /org/openffice/ure and /org/openoffice.org2.2, as 
happens today).  With the one-tree approach, on the other hand, either 
otherwise identical packages would have to be created in different 
versions containing different paths for the different products, or 
packages would have to be installed with complicated mechanisms (e.g., 
rpm --prefix, where wrong usage would lead to a nonfunctional 
installation), or all products would have to be lumped together under a 
single path.


- Increased flexibility.  Once an application's code is prepared to be 
spread across two or more trees, it is probably also quite resilient to 
other layout changes, like pressing it into the layout preferred by some 
Linux distribution.


Advantages of the one-tree approach (P = P1 + P2 merged at L):

- No changes to the code base needed.  I did a little experiment where I 
compared OOo and StarOffice en-US rpm installation sets on unxlngi6.pro 
SRC680m203, installed the common files to an /opt/openoffice.org2.2 tree 
and the StarOffice only files to an /opt/staroffice8 tree, and tried to 
successfully start soffice and execute the 
smoketestoo_native/data/smoketestdoc.sxw:1.2.  I had to hack about a 
dozen places where the current code base was not prepared for such a 
distributed layout.  A very conservative extrapolation from this single 
product, single platform, just survive the smoke test experiment to a 
general solution would be to assume that it revealed a fourth of all 
problems in the code base.  Continuing with a conservative estimation of 
one man week to solve each problem (coding and testing), this would 
roughly mean a man year of work.


- A single entry point for users.  It might be advantageous if all the 
files (executables, readmes, etc.) that make up the application's 
command line user interface are grouped in a single location where the 
user will most likely expect them.  This is problematic if files are 
spread across two trees (e.g., if the soffice executable is identical 
across OOo and StarOffice, it would be in the core tree, but a user 
would probably expect it in the StarOffice tree; for a user, it would 
probably be an implementation detail of StarOffice that it comes with an 
additional core tree beside the StarOffice tree).


Can you think of any other (dis-)advantages of the two approaches?  Are 
there any constraints imposed by additional package formats (e.g., even 
if it were a brittle solution, is it theoretically possible to relocate 
packages a la rpm --prefix for package formats like non-rpm Linux or Mac 
OS X, or would those be show stoppers anyway)?


-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] How to describe an "invalid" css.util.DateTime value

[Niklas Nebel]

Mathias Bauer wrote:

The whole magic behind that is that 01-01-1601 is taken as an invalid
date. I don't know why this date was chosen but perhaps somebody else
can shed some light on this.


January 1, 1601 is the base of Windows file time, as used in OLE 
SummaryInformation.


Niklas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] Insert a "ENTER" on Current Paragraph !

[Dyego Souza Dantas Leal]

I want to add a Listener on a Document to send a "ENTER" if the user use 
all paragraph ( is a limitation on openoffice of size on one paragraph )


Ok... I add a ModifyListener... but when i call:

System.out.println("See the text "+mxDoc.getText());

The app freeze... exist a problem with my Code ?


I'm using Java SE 6 , and OfficeBean ;)
aBean is a OfficeBean


Somebody help-me ? I need this to use OpenOffice in my app !!!

  try {
   aBean.getDocument().addModifyListener(new XModifyListener() {
   int i = 1;
  
   public void modified(EventObject eventObject) {
   System.out.println("See me !!! 
"+eventObject.Source.getClass() );

   XTextDocument mxDoc = null;
   mxDoc = (XTextDocument) 
UnoRuntime.queryInterface(XTextDocument.class, eventObject);
   XText eee = (XText) 
UnoRuntime.queryInterface(XText.class, eventObject);


   System.out.println("See the text "+mxDoc.getText());
  
   // get a reference to the body text of the document

   XText mxDocText = mxDoc.getText();
  
  
   mxDocText.insertString(null,"\n",true);

   System.out.println("modified !"+i++);
   }
  
   public void disposing(EventObject eventObject) {

   System.out.println("dispose");
   }
  
   });
  
   } catch (NoConnectionException ex) {

   ex.printStackTrace();
   }

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] How to describe an "invalid" css.util.DateTime value

[Mathias Bauer]

Hi,

our ancient c++ class "TimeStamp" (describing who did something and when
he did it) from the tools library has a special value for an invalid
TimeStamp:

#define TIMESTAMP_INVALID_DATETIME
( DateTime ( Date ( 1, 1, 1601 ), Time ( 0, 0, 0 ) ) )

The whole magic behind that is that 01-01-1601 is taken as an invalid
date. I don't know why this date was chosen but perhaps somebody else
can shed some light on this.

In our UNOIDL we don't have a TimeStamp struct and so usually this is
expressed as two attributes, a css.util.DateTime and a string. The IDL
documentation says that setting the Day and Month members of the Date to
0 marks the date as "void". This term looks pretty strange to me but I
think it means that this is an unspecified date and so it comes close to
what we currently express by using our "invalid" TimeStamp.

This creates some problems for refactoring code from using C++ classes
to UNO services. If the refactored code had an external API that
provides a TimeStamp (like our SfxDocumentInfo) we would need to
automatically convert the "void" css.util.DateTime to an invalid tools
DateTime struct internally. This has the drawback that each DateTime
object has to be checked for being "void".

Alternatively we could change the definition of
TIMESTAMP_INVALID_DATETIME to be compatible with the "void" DateTime
from the UNOIDL. This should create problems only in two cases:

- somebody treats Day=0 or Month=0 as valid or uses it to express
something else

- somebody explicitly uses Date(1,1,1601) for whatever reason

I would say that we shouldn't care for this (perhaps we could grep for
"1601" in the source code) and change TIMESTAMP_INVALID_DATETIME.

Opinions, anyone?

Ciao,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] UNO bootstrap doesn't work with classes/ as a symlink

[Rene Engelhard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Nevermind, doing myself with this message.

FWIW, for anyone interested, that's http://bugs.debian.org/413812 now.

Regards,
 
Rene

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7pRn+FmQsCSK63MRAo0rAJ9Ryo0it9xiC/VpqWu8kkovIbCUnQCeP5AG
+hHXReQAU0L2gVqK9bkZouw=
=XoB+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Seeking help/ideas on making work on all (Linux) distributions ...

[Stephan Bergmann]

Rene Engelhard wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Stephan Bergmann wrote:

Rene Engelhard wrote:

Well, it *might* be the cause that OOo doesn't grok that classes/ is a
symlink. 
Yes, a symlink does not work here.  Much OOo Java code (residing in jar 
files in program/classes) needs to find other OOo files (native 
libraries etc.) and does so using NativeLibraryLoader 
(jurt/com/sun/star/lib/util/NativeLibraryLoader.java:1.9). 
NativeLibraryLoader effectively goes up the directory hierarchy one 
level from program/classes to program to locate those files.  That of 
course breaks if program/classes is a symlink to somewhere else.


OK, as I feared. That also might explain some other problem I once had.

But to get sure, if I have classes/ as a normal dir and the jars/.class
files in there as symlinks to /usr/share/java/openoffice, that will
work, won't it?


Probably.  Confer the "hack magic" of the getResource method at 
jurt/com/sun/star/lib/util/NativeLibraryLoader.java:1.9 l. 78--128.


-Stephan

[...]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Seeking help/ideas on making work on all (Linux) distributions ...

[Rene Engelhard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >Well, it *might* be the cause that OOo doesn't grok that classes/ is a
> >symlink. 
> 
> Yes, a symlink does not work here.  Much OOo Java code (residing in jar 
> files in program/classes) needs to find other OOo files (native 
> libraries etc.) and does so using NativeLibraryLoader 
> (jurt/com/sun/star/lib/util/NativeLibraryLoader.java:1.9). 
> NativeLibraryLoader effectively goes up the directory hierarchy one 
> level from program/classes to program to locate those files.  That of 
> course breaks if program/classes is a symlink to somewhere else.

OK, as I feared. That also might explain some other problem I once had.

But to get sure, if I have classes/ as a normal dir and the jars/.class
files in there as symlinks to /usr/share/java/openoffice, that will
work, won't it?

> Much OOo code (Java and C++) is working in ways that will break if the 
> OOo installation structure is changed.  This is often problematic, and 
> should overall be changed I think.  However, it also implies that 

Indeed. Especially since I *do* spefify the path without the link
in the config..

Rony, please file a "important" bug for this referencing this thread
(URL best).

I'll fix it for the 2.2.0 packages.
I'd like to fix it also for the 2.0.4 packages for etch but I'd bet that
this change won't be approved now that late in the freeze, but I'll
try...

Regards,

Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7nxL+FmQsCSK63MRAh2aAJ9raRaBKRyZvWFaQb6FzW3wyOznCgCeJmeT
rkV2WP8dWL3oluroJSEhiQg=
=M4w3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Seeking help/ideas on making work on all (Linux) distributions ...

[Stephan Bergmann]

Rene Engelhard wrote:

Well, it *might* be the cause that OOo doesn't grok that classes/ is a
symlink. 


Yes, a symlink does not work here.  Much OOo Java code (residing in jar 
files in program/classes) needs to find other OOo files (native 
libraries etc.) and does so using NativeLibraryLoader 
(jurt/com/sun/star/lib/util/NativeLibraryLoader.java:1.9). 
NativeLibraryLoader effectively goes up the directory hierarchy one 
level from program/classes to program to locate those files.  That of 
course breaks if program/classes is a symlink to somewhere else.


Much OOo code (Java and C++) is working in ways that will break if the 
OOo installation structure is changed.  This is often problematic, and 
should overall be changed I think.  However, it also implies that 
whoever now fiddles with the OOo installation structure causes pain, not 
only to those poor souls that happen to use the deviating installation, 
but also to all community members who help to sort out the mess.


-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Seeking help/ideas on making work on all (Linux) distributions ...

[Rene Engelhard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Rene Engelhard wrote:
> In any case, you better should read the mail; he doesn't tell anything 
> about Windows or accessing the library, but he just wants to run
 ^^^
 registry, obviously.

Regards,
 
Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7nNZ+FmQsCSK63MRAieDAJ9YfLjLwD6YbiBfmCVd5oCOxTb5NQCeMrO5
ANU1xfgusijdkAzOX2Qyg80=
=oyHR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Preserving tags with different namespace

[ashok _]

Hello Barry:

I think you could use either of the following approaches...:

1) use ParagraphUserDefinedAttributes

these let you store (invisibly) custom attributes at the paragraph
style level

for example if you had to markup text in openoffice with an identifier
likeyou could store this i0001
value as a paragraph attribute for the specified paragraph in OO. The
attributes appear in styles.xml (and not content.xml) so you will have
to use XSLT to merge these attributes into your XML tags for the
required text fragment

(Note that, I tried using UserDefinedAttributes a while back, but
could never get them to work as the documentation said)

2) You could maybe encode the attributes into a openoffice text link,
by encoding all your attributes as plain text identifiers in the link
something like   and so
on... then when you transform the OO document you could parse the link
and convert that to the XML that you want

thanks

Ashok




On 3/5/07, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

Is it possible to add my own tags to an OpenDocument fie, in their own
namespace, and have OpenOffice preserve those tags across file edits?

I want to use this to include markup within an OpenDocument file and process it
with an external macro processor. The technique works really well, we're using
Jakarta Jelly as the macro processor, but subsequent changes to the OpenDocument
file remove all the Jelly tags.

Any ideas?

Thanks and Regards,

Barry


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Configure warnings under cygwin , plz help

[Rene Engelhard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Zaki wrote:
> I'm new to openoffice, i lanched ./Configure under cygwin, i have warnings :
   ^ .org.  ^ c

> Internal freetype2 does not support emboldening

Just ignore it. It's just that freetypes capabilities are checked and
the feetype you use (probably the ancient internal one of OOo doesn't
support emboldening, as the message says. That feature will be disabled,
then)

> Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at ./oowintool line 66

No idea and I don't want to look. Ask some Windows guy..

Regards,

Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7nLE+FmQsCSK63MRAjSaAJ9oGup9GmPo1q0tpvr4i2TIeVe8JACfdzxG
m6Hk54ZfUxDt2t1+m2gHKEw=
=FndE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Seeking help/ideas on making work on all (Linux) distributions ...

[Rene Engelhard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> > 
> > it has been my understanding that the
> >  class and its bootstrap() method
> > are meant to allow bootstrapping OpenOffice in an easy manner/fashion on
> > any operating system.
> > 
> > As I have reported, on some Linux distributions that I have come to look
> > at, the bootstrapping using   does
> > not work! 

Where is com.sun.star.helper.Bootstrap to be contained in?

> Maybe your distribution ships a crippled SDK.
> 
> Check whether you have a valid unowinreg.dll
> 
> see e.g.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377531

This is available since 2.0.3-3. Since a long time that is.
Of course, the 1.1.3 in Debian stable doesn 't have it but I somehow
doubt he was using this.

In any case, you better should read the mail; he doesn't tell anything 
about Windows or accessing the library, but he just wants to run
the bootstrap mechanism on Linux. On which unowinreg.dll is completely
non-relevant.

> > [...]
> > So it seems to me that Rene tried hard to create an OOo distribution
> > which adheres to both, the OOo and the Debian standards.
> > However, it seems too, that using 's
> > bootstrap does not work, as it is not able to find soffice!
> > :-((
> 
> Try with a vanilla build first, then you can shove it off to the paths

He did. That's why this discussion landed here again (after he asked me
what might be wrong)

> or something, or give the background details why you think it is the
> paths that are the problem.

Well, it *might* be the cause that OOo doesn't grok that classes/ is a
symlink. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/openoffice/program$ ls -l classes
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2007-03-04 22:33 classes -> 
../../../share/java/openoffice

But a) the dir is there (although as a link) and b)

cd $(PKGDIR)-common/$(OODIR)/program && \
  for i in jvmfwk3rc setuprc unorc; do \
perl -pi -e \
  's,\$$ORIGIN/classes,file:///usr/share/java/openoffice$(VER),g' \
$$i; \
  done

the path in the config is changed. I just kept the dir for people/stuff who
expect classes/ there for compatibility reasons.

Rony, can you maybe try to make classes/ a real dir and copy all the stuff from
/usr/share/java/openoffice into there?
(Then I'll probably have to change this to actually be a real dir and make the 
jars in there
symlinks to /usr/share/java)

Any bootstrap mechanism experts here reading this? Ideas?

Regards,

Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7nI4+FmQsCSK63MRAituAJ9N1qb+Bb8/dmB1zN91O1HyzEWkIQCff+oB
d7vAOeYEz2j8nw1HM/5+jZY=
=PTOT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]