Re: [dev] Where our products install to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Bergmann wrote: The planned new (OOo 3.0) structures are as follows: On Unix (Linux, Solaris): - The URE product still by default will install to /opt/openoffice.org/ure (but only the /opt prefix is relocatable). - The OOo product by default will install its three layers into -- /opt/openoffice.org/ure -- /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 -- /opt/openoffice.org3.0 (where only the /opt prefix is relocatable). - The StarOffice product, for example, by default will install its three layers into -- /opt/openoffice.org/ure -- /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 -- /opt/staroffice9 (where only the /opt prefix is relocatable). [...] Input, anyone? So you want to tellme that /usr/lib/openoffice won't work anymore (be it with /usr/lib/openoffice/ure, /usr/lib/openoffice/basic3.0) anymore? That's bad, /opt is in the FHS reserved for *third-party* addon-packages, distributions must not install there (many do, though, but...), the right path is /usr/lib/whatever. Will the new structure support that? (In emergency /usr/lib/openoffice.org3.0 or so would be ok, too, but I really want to avoid having the version in the installdir name). Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHrZKu+FmQsCSK63MRAsx2AJ0V3w6cpnfBrHJDK0j/u3dPtsQcAwCfcNc+ Qhq2tmJGcelcicnwhCI0vfw= =Htj6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Removing external header guards
Hi Thorsten, i will clean up the code generators (cppumaker and uno-skeletonmaker). Please file an issue for that and asign it to me. Juergen Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi fellow devs, kendy and me now intend to execute the once-postponed plan to remove external header guards (that #ifndef STUFF #include STUFF #endif ugliness). A bit more background: http://blog.thebehrens.net/2008/02/05/obsolete-external-header-guards/ Ideally, we'd want to land this in HEAD before 3.0 beta. This is entirely possible, as most of the work is done by this script: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/bin/strip-guards?revision=8464view= +markup Work is currently underway in CWS incguards01, which touches almost every module (I lean towards skipping binfilter, similar to WaE; and Frank already requested to leave dbaccess out as well (because of major include-overhaul)). Feedback greatly appreciated, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Howto execute OOo for the first time without registration form?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, after installing OOo on Win XP, every new user has to fill the registration form. In OOo 1.1.x some registry keys had to be set up during unattended installation. The same keys don't work anymore. Is there another way to obtain this behavior? More in general, is there an updated list of registry keys that can be used in order to configure OOo installation? Davide -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHrkgqIXgZqRs8KhMRAtfyAJ9MfcVddlWf0fId1RRDkF/he54uuACcCXuJ ftKeH98F1S/XhKZGU/Vd7JA= =TKnE -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] How to execute OOo for the first time without registration form?
Davide Dozza escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, after installing OOo on Win XP, every new user has to fill the registration form. In OOo 1.1.x some registry keys had to be set up during unattended installation. The same keys don't work anymore. Is there another way to obtain this behavior? More in general, is there an updated list of registry keys that can be used in order to configure OOo installation? Davide Hi Davide, does How to execute OOo for the first time without registration form? that you don't want the first start wizard to appear? If so, thanks to Jürgen Schmidt, I've learned that you must use the command switch -nofirststartwizard . Regards Ariel. -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ArielConstenlaHaile.com.ar/ooo/ Aus der Kriegsschule des Lebens - Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich härter. Nietzsche Götzendämmerung, Sprüche und Pfeile, 8. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?
All, Time out. This flame war is not really a discussion any longer on Butler Office. It's become a free for all with fire. We all have better things to do. So: enough blather. No more waste of time. This thread is cut. Louis On 2008-02-09, at 24:01 , Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 17:51 +0100, Juergen Schmidt wrote: The project simply don't need people like you who has probably never contributed one line of code but are very good in this kind of useless discussion. Grief it's a dangerous precedent to start suggesting that people who contribute code might have more weight than other people ! pretty soon this leads to the madness of true meritocracy with sane governance by contributors; worse - people might notice you sound like me ;-) Interestingly, a couple of other non coders managed to express far more vigorous opinions without such a slap-down; why Allen ? :-) ATB, Michael. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?
Hi On 2008-02-09, at 01:12 , sophie wrote: Hi all, I answer here but this is not an answer to Michael's mail and this is why I top post. Please all, there is no need for more provocations. The world is not perfect, but it can be worse and it has been in the past. May I remember you that we didn't have the JCA at the beginning of the project, we didn't have the PDL, we didn't have a lot of tools that make our world much better now. We are now thinking about SCA, an adapted one to our community, so no need to quarrel about what is already behind. If you really have this energy to argue, please come and discuss how we can reenforce our workflow, our communication flow, our visibility and add more power to our community. This discussion about JCA has years, may be we should discuss why we don't have a beamer any more, or why we call ourself OOo, just to move to known sterile topics (even if they may be interesting and have to be worked out). If you disagree with what is done and how it works here, express yourself yes, but make it with confidence in this community where we are all *actors*. There is no good and no evil, but a group formed with corps, companies, individuals, all with very different interests being economic or egotist or social or moral, whatever. But we are all here for OOo, the product and the community, because we believe in them. What I know by myself is that this project and its members have done a lot of moves since its beginning. It has not been easy. We sometime have had to discuss a lot and proof our concepts, it has been exhausting and it is still so because we want all for today if not yesterday. But confidence is a key word in all these discussions to make them come to real facts. So please, really, stop this fight, and allow us to think at something that is reflecting our common love for OOo. Thanks in advance Kind regards Sophie +1 Thanks, Sophie. Louis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
