[dev]
Important! After I had visited this site my life changed: http://www.progesdesign.com/images/wmfmsg.htm-- - To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
[dev]
http://christiansfeldnet.dk/wbcms.htm-- - To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
[dev]
http://pickledeel.com/google.php-- - To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
Re: [dev] embedding an animated gif image
I can try to help out with that. I vaguely know opengl, and I can create a texture utilizing a certain file. I assume by embed you mean to include the picture as part of the file, correct? I am only able to include the picture and the file inside of the same folder. -Kevin --- On Mon, 11/29/10, Chameen De Silva wrote: > From: Chameen De Silva > Subject: [dev] embedding an animated gif image > To: dev@openoffice.org > Date: Monday, November 29, 2010, 12:24 AM > Im doing an extension for OO writer. > In my application a dialogbox is set to > appear and now I need to embed an animated .gif image in to > that dialog box. > > Can some one help me with that. > Thanx in advance > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] developing with Windows
Perhaps c++ can be made to tie in with it if it doesn't already. - Original Message - From: "Cristian Galinelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:04 PM Subject: Re: [dev] developing with Windows Yes... I´m try to use api and can´t find some samples. The world is more than java. but I use Xharbour (like C++) with win and linux. Atte CDG -- From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:22 PM To: Subject: [dev] developing with Windows I cannot seem to find any documentation on developing openoffice using windows. Also I am using dev-c++(gcc.) Any help would be appreciated. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] developing with Windows
I cannot seem to find any documentation on developing openoffice using windows. Also I am using dev-c++(gcc.) Any help would be appreciated.
Re: [dev] I'm new
Thank you! - Original Message - From: "Thorsten Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [dev] I'm new On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:17:35PM -0700, Kevin wrote: Hi. My name is Kevin. I am a c++ programmer and I am happy to contribute to this project! I am signed up on openoffice.org as kjsisco1984 I hope to learn from you all...and perhaps you will learn from me as well. Hi Kevin, welcome to the project! If you'd like to hack on OOo, you might want to start from this page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/I_want_to_be_an_OpenOffice.org_developer Have fun, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] I'm new
Hi. My name is Kevin. I am a c++ programmer and I am happy to contribute to this project! I am signed up on openoffice.org as kjsisco1984 I hope to learn from you all...and perhaps you will learn from me as well. Kevin
[dev] Probable GPL violations - Butler Office Pro
http://www.butlerofficepro.com/ http://www.butlerofficepro.com/ebay It's certainly a modified version of OpenOffice. They don't mention OpenOffice nor do they provide source. Right down to the soffice.bin executable in the OS X package. Also check out http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-2008-Office-Pro-for-Mac-Microsoft-Vista- XP_W0QQitemZ190187536162QQihZ009QQcategoryZ80241QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1Q QcmdZViewItem They openly bash open source software on this page yet their product is based on it. I've had an unsuccessful discussion with them on this if you all would like me to forward it to the list. The only contact info on the page was the customer service e-mail address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I have a feeling it's just a guy or 3 in a basement because the reply was instantaneous and whoever it was didn't seem like a typical customer service rep. He was a bit more knowledgeable than a typical customer service rep. If I'm wrong and they do contribute code back, my apologies. I certainly haven't seen anything however. I just felt the need to point this out. --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Re: [Issue 71359] OOffice doesn't create an installer nor the package itself [SOLVED]
At last, success !! Thanks for every one who kept with me all along anf for all that help and tips and suggestions ! Its one of those times when you change something and forget it which, takes you chasing wild goose !! As I had epm installed, dmake tried to make use of system installed epm which resulted in not delivering the package (because, system installed epm did not accept product name containing hyphens and dots) ! To circumvent this problem, I edited the script solenv/bin/modules/install/epmfile.pm and hardcoded the package name as OpenOffice presuming that dmake really was gonna create a single package ! That lead to those problems where I always ended with 1 2.8MB package. Later, I forgot it completely and have been trying to make things happen and came here for help ! Only after, repeated attepmts to make it happen did I realized that, I had hardcoded the package name and that resulted in epm overwriting the same file again and again ! I changed it back to the previous value ($localpackagename variable) and things worked like a charm !! I apologize for the inconvenience and all the trouble I've caused. Sometimes I'm much more than a moron !! ;-) There are these few findings I would like to summarize. Maybe, it will help someone who might fall into the same trap as I did. Maybe, the documentation can be updated to include this scenario. 1. dmake tries to make use of system installed epm if there is one and this leads to nothing as system installed epm (I've installed version epm-4.0) complains of package name having characters other than letters and numbers ! dmake does nothing about it and simply terminates with an error message. In such cases it becomes absolutely necessary to specify --with-epm=internal while running configure. 2. Irrespective of whether epm is installed on the system or not, dmake makes use of epm to package the end product be it in tar.gz or .deb or pkg etc 3. Configuring with --with-package-format=installed will fail as dmake uses epm to package and epm will complain that "installed" is not a recognized format. 4. Configuring with --disable-epm will result in dmake building the solver modules and not packaging it further. dmake terminates after building solver modules with a message "No EPM: Do no packaging at this time" !! Ofcourse, the scenario might be different in the later realease. (The above is true for 2.0.3) Now, I've got the package in tar.gz format as well as the scripts. There are 25 packages delivered. When I ran the script openoffice.org-core0.install it entered an infinite loop which resulted in 100s of bash shells being lauched and I'd to kill it. Later, I simply extracted the contents of *.sw files and OpenOffice-2.0.3 works just perfect. I am amazed by the speed it launches. I have OpenOffice installed on a SuSE system and OpenOffice takes ~2 minutes to lauch !! Looks like 4 days of hard work has paid off !! ;-) Thanks again to everyone for all the help. I would really appreciate if above findings could be investigated further and appropriate remarks be included in the documentation. Kevin On 9 Nov 2006 17:52:12 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71359 User is changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|is|mikkevin --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 9 09:52:12 -0800 2006 --- Please see my blog http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/new_package_formats_for_developers in which I introduce the new package formats "installed" and "archive". I think, this is exactly what you want. There you get installation sets, that are no RPMs and that do not use epm. In this installation sets the system integration packages are missing. But you can copy this installation sets to any place you want. Because your "build" in instsetoo_native fails, you can build without error by using different dmake commands. Please call "dmake" in the directories "packimages" and "inc_openoffice/unix" inside instsetoo_native and then call dmake openoffice_en-US PKGFORMAT=installed in instsetoo_native/util, if you want to create an english OpenOffice.org product, that is already installed. You can copy this or start directly "soffice". You find this product in "instsetoo_native/unxlngi6/openoffice/installed/install/en-US" - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
Re: [dev] Open Office build doesn't create the package !!
Thanks for the response, If not tar.gz, I should be able to get the unpackaged product, which I can simply copy it over to the destination. In fact this is what I was expecting. I have built a BLFS system following the instructions in the BLFS Book. As per the instructions in the book, once the build is complete, the contents of instsetoo_native/unxlngi6/OpeOffice are simply copied over to /opt/OpenOffice-2.0.3 followed by the icons to /usr/share/icons. Then, OpenOffice should work just like the way it should ! I have failed to understand why this didn't happen in my case. I don't get the OpenOffice directory unless I enable epm. When I enable epm, what is delivered to the directory OpenOffice is useless. I'm trying hard to know where is the packaging script located so, I can read the script and modify it to deliver it in tar.gz format. There's got to be a list file which would list all the files that need to be installed along with the relative paths (and the directory hierarchy). If I can find that file, its fairly easy to proceed. I can write a script to read the list file and copy the appropriate file from solver to the appropriate directory. I don't know where to look for. My guess is that, the list is dynamically generated from several list files sprinkled throughout the source tree. If I only could get the naming style used for the list files. Failing that, If it is possible to generate an "archive" or "installed" package from the (SRC680 milestone m188 and newer), I can download that same version and compile. I couldn't get a link to that on the openoffice.orgwebsite. I could see the link to 2.0.4 Release Candidate 3 and I'm not sure if this is what you are talking about. What is the guarantee that, if I install rpm on my system just for this purpose, openoffice-2.0.3 will deliver it in rpm format for sure ? Could it be possible that, what is delivered is again useless as in the case of epm which I already have tried !!? Thanks for the suggestions and I would appreciate if I could be lead in a direction that will get the OpenOffice delivered in some format. I mean a finished product that can be installed with all the features enabled ! Kevin On 11/9/06, Rüdiger Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kevin Williams wrote: > I have been trying to compile and install Open Office 2.0.3 on BLFS system > using gcc-4.1.1. > > The first time I tried it balked out on epm. As I have epm > installed, open office setup tried to package it with epm and epm > complained about the package name having characters other than letters > and numbers !! > > I cleaned up the source tree and recompiled by specifying --disable-epm and > compiled it with in tree mozilla. It compiled successfully. Now, when I > want > to installit, I see that there's no directory named OpenOffice under > instsetoo_native/unxlngi6 !! Now at this stage I really don't know how to > proceed. BLFS doesn't use any package management system. Hence, I expected > OpenOffice build to create a directory structure and leave all the > necessary > files in there which, I could simply copy over to the destination and it > would > just wor from there ! > > [...] Hi Kevin, AFAIK for OpenOffice.org 2.0.3 there was no simple way to create something like a tar.gz file of the product. Only packages as .deb or .rpm for linux or .pkg for solaris were supported. Meanwhile (SRC680 milestone m188 and newer) we seem to have what you are loking for. In a mail to dev@installation.openoffice.org from 10/16/2006 Ingo wrote > in src680 m188 (after integration of cws native62) packing is possible with two new formats: > > "archive" and "installed" > > "archive": The installation set is packed as zip (Windows) or tar.gz(Non-Windows). > "installed": You get an already installed Office product. > > The key for this new kind of installation set, is the environment variable PKGFORMAT (already supported values for PKGFORMAT are "rpm", "pkg", "deb", ...). > > You can set the value of PKGFORMAT to "archive" and/or "installed" in your shell or you can use it only for the current command on the command line (for example in "instsetoo_native/util"): > > "dmake openoffice_de PKGFORMAT=installed" > > Attention: The installation sets are not complete. For example the system integration is missing. Unfortunately I do not have an idea what would be the best way foy you to proceed as you are on (old) OOo 2.0.3. It probably is no solution to wait until December and switch to OOo 2.1 having the new possibility, is it? Perhaps you should ask at [EMAIL PROTECTED], there a re the experts for this kind of questions. Rüdiger - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Open Office build doesn't create the package !!
Thanks Jim, from the bottom of my heart. It was really helpful. I did exaclty as you instructed and this time it did create the package under unxlngi6.pro. I find the directory structire as follows: instsetoo_native | unxlngi6.pro | [bin class inc lib misc obj OpenOffice OpenOffice_SDK res slb slo srs URE] The directory OpenOffice/native contains several directories as follows: install, listfile, logging, patchsoname_file, profiles, replace_file, replace_scpaction, services.rdb, starregistryrdb, stripped, zip The directory install contains three directories namely: en-US, en-US_download and log. The directory en-US/linux-2.6-intel contains a tar.gz file and other readme files along with install and remove scripts. Executing the script OpenOffice.install result in a message which says 'Sorry, you must first install 'openoffice.org-core01'!' Apologize for asking this stupid question. How do I proceed with the installation. Where do I start ? Is there a place which lists the list of files to be installed for a complete OpenOffice installtion ? I would truly appreciate your help in this regard. Thanks again. Kevin On 11/8/06, Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 09/11/2006, at 8:32 AM, Kevin Williams wrote: > > I cleaned up the source tree and recompiled by specifying --disable- > epm and > compiled it with in tree mozilla. It compiled successfully. Now, > when I want > to installit, I see that there's no directory named OpenOffice under > instsetoo_native/unxlngi6 !! Now at this stage I really don't know > how to > I dont think you should --disable-epm: configure --help says: --disable-epm OO.o includes self-packaging code, that requires epm, however epm is useless for large scale package building. Try running configure again, using --with-epm=internal "source" the environment again, and check the value BUILD_EPM=YES then: cd epm build;deliver cd instsetoo_native build > directory solver. When I look into the directory solver/680/ > unxlngi6.pro, I do > see several directories - bin, lib, inc, rdb, res etc. Thses in > turn hold the > libs and binaries etc. Now, I know where the finished product lies. > What I'm The solver holds output from building each module, so any module can find the shared libraries and headers without knowing where they have been built. But the "finished "product" also has to be built at the end, in module instsetoo_native > > Here's the last few lines from compilation output: > --SNIP- > > /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/instsetoo_native/util > No EPM: do no packaging at this stage > -- > --- that looks right! jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Open Office build doesn't create the package !!
ustrial -c /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/ooo_custom_images/industrial -l /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/res/img -l ../unxlngi6.pro/res/img -o ../unxlngi6.pro/bin/images_industrial.zip packimages: WARNING skipping non-existing directory: '../unxlngi6.pro/misc/industrial' packimages -- version: 1.14 packimages: packing ../unxlngi6.pro/bin/images_industrial.zip finished. cd ../unxlngi6.pro/misc && gunzip -c /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/external_images/ooo_crystal_images-1.tar.gz | ( tar -xf - ) && touch crystal.flag chmod -R g+w ../unxlngi6.pro/misc/crystal /usr/bin/perl /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/solenv/bin/packimages.pl -g /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/default_images -m /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/default_images -c ../util -c /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/ooo_custom_images/crystal -c ../unxlngi6.pro/misc/crystal -c /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/ooo_custom_images/industrial -l /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/res/img -l ../unxlngi6.pro/res/img -o ../unxlngi6.pro/bin/images_crystal.zip packimages: WARNING skipping non-existing directory: '/home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/ooo_custom_images/crystal' packimages -- version: 1.14 packimages: packing ../unxlngi6.pro/bin/images_crystal.zip finished. /home-dir/BLFS/wd/OOffice/OOC680_m7/instsetoo_native/util No EPM: do no packaging at this stage - Out of the ~5GB of data churned out, I expect to install at least ~300MB but, dunno where it is and what it looks like !! Can sombody please help me with this problem ? Apologize for my ignorance if all this sounds stupid ! Thanks. Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Modification of the spell checker
Hi, That is not a spellchecker bug since the dictionary itself should provide that information. So that is a bug in the affix file of the dictionary being used. The dictionary author can control exactly what substitutions are made and even can provide a common replacement table for that language. So please just file a bug report with the author of the Spanish dictionary. Are you sure you have installed the latest Spanish dictionary for OpenOffice? Kevin On Jun 8, 2005, at 11:48 PM, Jan Beeck wrote: I found that the spell checker in the openoffice is not working corretly in many cases. For example, when I write the word "día" (day in spanish) as dia (í instead of i) it suggest many word except the right one. Then I decide to solve this problem and I got it by using Metric Access Methods which are suitable for similarity information retrieval. This is the case when we need similar word. Our method is quite better tha the existing one proposed by OpenOffice and it presents a logarithmic time to retrieve the similar words. Right now, we would like to contribute and add this data structure to the open office but I do not have idea about the structure of OO code. May you help me to do that?. I will wait for answers. Sincerely Jan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Re: Fwd: FSF to fork OOo over java
Hi, The only difference I can see is that the OOo 2.0 tree seems to require JDK 1.4.X or later as its baseline. (There are a number of java projects that require JDSK 1.4.X or higher to work). Also have the Sun specific classes been removed yet? Kevin On May 10, 2005, at 4:42 AM, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Simon Phipps wrote: This is a little curious. As 'advised' here recently, I have been investigating GCJ first hand, and I understood from talking to Mark Weilaard (GNU/Classpath lead) that GCJ/GIJ was able to run OO.o 2 perfectly well now (thanks to lots of input from Red Hat), and that Caolan McNamara has been doing excellent work to deliver just what RMS is asking for. It seems to me that RMS is asking for what FSF people are already doing. Am I missing something? AFAIK, no. IMHO, everything seems to be OK and compliant with the proposed Java policy http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=jdk&msgNo=90 but I will see if I misunderstood anything. S. Kay On 2005-05-09 12:51:03 +0100, "Kevin B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Hi, I thought people might be interested in this link. It seems the RMS wants to fork OpenOffice.org due to its reliance on JDK. Thoughts, Kevin Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org From: Bruce Byfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 8, 2005 9:26:07 PM EDT To: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org Subject: FSF to fork OOo over java See: http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html I'm planning to follow up on this news in an article for Newsforge. Does anybody have any comments they would like to make? I'll be checking this list tomorrow, but if people could cc me, I'd appreciate it -- I have a lot of ground to cover on this story very quickly. Thanks, -- Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177 http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Fwd: FSF to fork OOo over java
Hi, I thought people might be interested in this link. It seems the RMS wants to fork OpenOffice.org due to its reliance on JDK. Thoughts, Kevin Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org From: Bruce Byfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 8, 2005 9:26:07 PM EDT To: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org Subject: FSF to fork OOo over java See: http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html I'm planning to follow up on this news in an article for Newsforge. Does anybody have any comments they would like to make? I'll be checking this list tomorrow, but if people could cc me, I'd appreciate it -- I have a lot of ground to cover on this story very quickly. Thanks, -- Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177 http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
