[jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification -- Key: OWB-603 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Improvement Components: Interceptor and Decorators Affects Versions: 1.1.0 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Mark Struberg Fix For: 1.2.0 This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism because it's better than what we currently have. As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? Joe On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification -- Key: OWB-603 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Improvement Components: Interceptor and Decorators Affects Versions: 1.1.0 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Mark Struberg Fix For: 1.2.0 This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism because it's better than what we currently have. As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: Yan: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
yes, I think we should get 1.1.1 out of the door the next 2 weeks anyway ;) For now I did just commit things which improve our current behaviour in non-BDA mode with Weld. An example: in Seam3 some interceptors are defined over and over again in each jar. This used to lead to a WebBeansConfigurationException claiming that an interceptor is only allowed once. But actually that is wrong: it must only exist once in the _same_ _beans.xml_! I'll spare the ordering and enabled stuff from CDI-1.1 for OWB-1.2. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 8/12/11, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Yan: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Friday, August 12, 2011, 7:15 PM Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? +1. Gurkan Kimden: Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 12 Ağustos 2011 22:13 Cuma Konu: Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? Joe On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification -- Key: OWB-603 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Improvement Components: Interceptor and Decorators Affects Versions: 1.1.0 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Mark Struberg Fix For: 1.2.0 This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism because it's better than what we currently have. As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
