[DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
Hi folks! We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks *) mem leak fix *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions *) lazy SessionContext creation *) site fix (currently in progress locally) *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support *) lots of EJB improvements I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 tomorrow, WDYT? If you like to complete/test some feature which you think must go into this release, then please ping me. txs and LieGrue, strub
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
Hello, I think we have to switch to GA. Because people think that Alpha is not production ready! So 1.0.0 GA will be the best! Thanks; --Gurkan - Original Message From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 11:22:41 AM Subject: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 Hi folks! We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks *) mem leak fix *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions *) lazy SessionContext creation *) site fix (currently in progress locally) *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support *) lots of EJB improvements I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 tomorrow, WDYT? If you like to complete/test some feature which you think must go into this release, then please ping me. txs and LieGrue, strub
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
That's fine with me! But I'd rather not call it 1.0.0-GA but only 1.0.0. It's obvious that it's Generally Available now ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 8:43 AM Hello, I think we have to switch to GA. Because people think that Alpha is not production ready! So 1.0.0 GA will be the best! Thanks; --Gurkan - Original Message From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 11:22:41 AM Subject: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 Hi folks! We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks *) mem leak fix *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions *) lazy SessionContext creation *) site fix (currently in progress locally) *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support *) lots of EJB improvements I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 tomorrow, WDYT? If you like to complete/test some feature which you think must go into this release, then please ping me. txs and LieGrue, strub
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
:) Ok, yeah --Gurkan - Original Message From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 11:52:36 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 That's fine with me! But I'd rather not call it 1.0.0-GA but only 1.0.0. It's obvious that it's Generally Available now ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 8:43 AM Hello, I think we have to switch to GA. Because people think that Alpha is not production ready! So 1.0.0 GA will be the best! Thanks; --Gurkan - Original Message From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 11:22:41 AM Subject: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 Hi folks! We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks *) mem leak fix *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions *) lazy SessionContext creation *) site fix (currently in progress locally) *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support *) lots of EJB improvements I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 tomorrow, WDYT? If you like to complete/test some feature which you think must go into this release, then please ping me. txs and LieGrue, strub
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
cool thanks! I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our ugly site today ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: From: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 AM FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today before tag
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
the problem with OWB-444 is that it is pretty much work and changes a lot of internal things. Thus I'd like to postpone it for a 1.1.x release and now ship 1.0.0 because it's otherwise really stable. I'll create a 1.0.x maintenance branch while releasing 1.0.0 and move the trunk to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. If we find any important problems (blockers, mem-leaks and such things) in 1.0.0, then we'll fix it in the branch and ship it as 1.0.1 . All daily stuff and fixes will then be done in the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT trunk. Any objections? txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:38 AM hello, basically i would vote +1. however, as mentioned earlier it would be great if we finish OWB-444 before the release of v1. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de cool thanks! I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our ugly site today ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: From: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 AM FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today before tag
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
Any1 got some spare time to review our documentation? http://openwebbeans.apache.org/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/documents/userguide.pdf I think a few things are pretty outdated already. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 11:02 AM i know - that was the reason why i wrote: basically i would vote +1. +1 for the maintenance branch. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de the problem with OWB-444 is that it is pretty much work and changes a lot of internal things. Thus I'd like to postpone it for a 1.1.x release and now ship 1.0.0 because it's otherwise really stable. I'll create a 1.0.x maintenance branch while releasing 1.0.0 and move the trunk to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. If we find any important problems (blockers, mem-leaks and such things) in 1.0.0, then we'll fix it in the branch and ship it as 1.0.1 . All daily stuff and fixes will then be done in the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT trunk. Any objections? txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:38 AM hello, basically i would vote +1. however, as mentioned earlier it would be great if we finish OWB-444 before the release of v1. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de cool thanks! I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our ugly site today ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: From: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 AM FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today before tag
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
i suggest to move the documentation to the confluence wiki. it's easier for the community to contribute to the documentation. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Any1 got some spare time to review our documentation? http://openwebbeans.apache.org/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/documents/userguide.pdf I think a few things are pretty outdated already. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 11:02 AM i know - that was the reason why i wrote: basically i would vote +1. +1 for the maintenance branch. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de the problem with OWB-444 is that it is pretty much work and changes a lot of internal things. Thus I'd like to postpone it for a 1.1.x release and now ship 1.0.0 because it's otherwise really stable. I'll create a 1.0.x maintenance branch while releasing 1.0.0 and move the trunk to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. If we find any important problems (blockers, mem-leaks and such things) in 1.0.0, then we'll fix it in the branch and ship it as 1.0.1 . All daily stuff and fixes will then be done in the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT trunk. Any objections? txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:38 AM hello, basically i would vote +1. however, as mentioned earlier it would be great if we finish OWB-444 before the release of v1. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de cool thanks! I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our ugly site today ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: From: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 AM FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today before tag
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
OWB Wiki is enabled at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/Index --Gurkan - Original Message From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 3:10:07 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 +1 Gurkan, can you setup confluence and write a small howto? txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 12:06 PM i suggest to move the documentation to the confluence wiki. it's easier for the community to contribute to the documentation. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Any1 got some spare time to review our documentation? http://openwebbeans.apache.org/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/documents/userguide.pdf I think a few things are pretty outdated already. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 11:02 AM i know - that was the reason why i wrote: basically i would vote +1. +1 for the maintenance branch. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de the problem with OWB-444 is that it is pretty much work and changes a lot of internal things. Thus I'd like to postpone it for a 1.1.x release and now ship 1.0.0 because it's otherwise really stable. I'll create a 1.0.x maintenance branch while releasing 1.0.0 and move the trunk to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. If we find any important problems (blockers, mem-leaks and such things) in 1.0.0, then we'll fix it in the branch and ship it as 1.0.1 . All daily stuff and fixes will then be done in the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT trunk. Any objections? txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:38 AM hello, basically i would vote +1. however, as mentioned earlier it would be great if we finish OWB-444 before the release of v1. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de cool thanks! I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our ugly site today ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: From: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 AM FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today before tag
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi folks! We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks *) mem leak fix *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions *) lazy SessionContext creation *) site fix (currently in progress locally) *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support *) lots of EJB improvements I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 tomorrow, WDYT? If you like to complete/test some feature which you think must go into this release, then please ping me. Before 1.0, should we update the name of the openwebbeans/ subdirectories and/or the maven output jars for ejb/openejb? webbeans-ejb produces webbeans-ejb-common.jar (which does not depend on openejb) webbeans-openejb produces webbeans-ejb.jar (which depends on openejb) Just my pet peeve/confusion, if they were just ejb-common/ejb-common and ejb-openejb/ejb-openejb (or openejb/openejb) it would be less confusing. Of course I have no idea of the conventions in this area, the packaging ramifications, or am able to actually do the work :) -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
SNAPSHOT + site deploy went well. The new site will show up after getting synced in a few hours. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 2:06 PM oki changed this now, will commit it soon and then I'll start a snapshot deploy + site deploy. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 2:03 PM Hah, yes definitely. Completely confusing historical artifact ;) txs 4 the catch, could you change this please? LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: From: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 1:56 PM On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi folks! We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks *) mem leak fix *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions *) lazy SessionContext creation *) site fix (currently in progress locally) *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support *) lots of EJB improvements I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 tomorrow, WDYT? If you like to complete/test some feature which you think must go into this release, then please ping me. Before 1.0, should we update the name of the openwebbeans/ subdirectories and/or the maven output jars for ejb/openejb? webbeans-ejb produces webbeans-ejb-common.jar (which does not depend on openejb) webbeans-openejb produces webbeans-ejb.jar (which depends on openejb) Just my pet peeve/confusion, if they were just ejb-common/ejb-common and ejb-openejb/ejb-openejb (or openejb/openejb) it would be less confusing. Of course I have no idea of the conventions in this area, the packaging ramifications, or am able to actually do the work :) -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
