Re: Yan: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
yes, I think we should get 1.1.1 out of the door the next 2 weeks anyway ;) For now I did just commit things which improve our current behaviour in non-BDA mode with Weld. An example: in Seam3 some interceptors are defined over and over again in each jar. This used to lead to a WebBeansConfigurationException claiming that an is only allowed once. But actually that is wrong: it must only exist once in the _same_ _beans.xml_! I'll spare the ordering and enabled stuff from CDI-1.1 for OWB-1.2. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 8/12/11, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > From: Gurkan Erdogdu > Subject: Yan: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive > handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" > Date: Friday, August 12, 2011, 7:15 PM > >>>Should we separate owb > 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from > >>>>early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch > perhaps? > > +1. > > > Gurkan > > > > > Kimden: Joseph Bergmark > Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Gönderildiği Tarih: 12 Ağustos 2011 22:13 Cuma > Konu: Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced > BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 > specification > > Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 > implementation) from > early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? > > Joe > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) > > wrote: > > Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the > preliminary CDI-1.1 specification > > > -- > > > > Key: OWB-603 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 > > Project: OpenWebBeans > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: Interceptor and Decorators > > Affects Versions: 1.1.0 > > Reporter: Mark Struberg > > Assignee: Mark Struberg > > Fix For: 1.2.0 > > > > > > This affects Interceptors, Decorators and > Alternatives: > > > > The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators > and Alternatives must only count for beans of the very the > Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they are defined in (via > beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no TCK > for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. > > The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving > this: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 > > > > This is work in progress, but we should stay close to > the new mechanism because it's better than what we currently > have. > > > > As a first step, we shall remove our > DeploymentException when the same Interceptor gets enabled > in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > > >
Yan: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
>>>Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from >>>>early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? +1. Gurkan Kimden: Joseph Bergmark Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 12 Ağustos 2011 22:13 Cuma Konu: Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? Joe On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) wrote: > Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 > specification > -- > > Key: OWB-603 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 > Project: OpenWebBeans > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Interceptor and Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.1.0 > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Assignee: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.2.0 > > > This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: > > The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must > only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they > are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no > TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. > The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 > > This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism > because it's better than what we currently have. > > As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same > Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > >
Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? Joe On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) wrote: > Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 > specification > -- > > Key: OWB-603 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 > Project: OpenWebBeans > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Interceptor and Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.1.0 > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Assignee: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.2.0 > > > This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: > > The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must > only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they > are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no > TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. > The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 > > This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism > because it's better than what we currently have. > > As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same > Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > >
[jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification
Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification -- Key: OWB-603 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Improvement Components: Interceptor and Decorators Affects Versions: 1.1.0 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Mark Struberg Fix For: 1.2.0 This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism because it's better than what we currently have. As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
