Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

[Mark Struberg]

Time to tally the VOTE.

And sorry for taking so long!

Here is also my own +1.


The VOTE did therefore pass with the following
+1: Thomas, Gerhard, Daniel, Reinhard, Mark

No -1 nor 0

Will proceed with the release tasks.

txs and LieGrue,
strub



> Am 29.01.2024 um 10:36 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi lords and ladies!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2
> 
> We fixed the following tickets
> 
> Bug
>[OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not 
> have the property 'xxx'
>[OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE
> 
> Improvement
>[OWB-1434] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions
> 
> 
> The stating repo is here
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/
> 
> 
> The source jar is available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.2/
> 
> sha512 is 
> 28199a1eaff15f3c5b9a6d11467eb595a3c9e78bfde5e9e624ed9e4031d48cb86546c88836f92ac0040f30261a3081a7fa543959ef1489061de31ef5f27fcc5f
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care or not perfect
> [-1] abort, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

[Reinhard Sandtner]

+1

lg
reini 

> Am 04.02.2024 um 16:53 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos 
> :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> +1
> 
>> On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 07:48 Gerhard Petracek  wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
>>> :
>>> 
>>> Hi lords and ladies!
>>> 
>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2
>>> 
>>> We fixed the following tickets
>>> 
>>> Bug
>>>[OWB-1436] -
>> org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not have the
>> property 'xxx'
>>>[OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE
>>> 
>>> Improvement
>>>[OWB-1434] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The stating repo is here
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The source jar is available at
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.2/
>>> 
>>> sha512 is
>> 28199a1eaff15f3c5b9a6d11467eb595a3c9e78bfde5e9e624ed9e4031d48cb86546c88836f92ac0040f30261a3081a7fa543959ef1489061de31ef5f27fcc5f
>>> 
>>> Please VOTE
>>> 
>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care or not perfect
>>> [-1] abort, there is a ${showstopper}
>>> 
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hello,

+1

On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 07:48 Gerhard Petracek  wrote:

> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
> >
> > Hi lords and ladies!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2
> >
> > We fixed the following tickets
> >
> > Bug
> > [OWB-1436] -
> org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not have the
> property 'xxx'
> > [OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE
> >
> > Improvement
> > [OWB-1434] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions
> >
> >
> > The stating repo is here
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/
> >
> >
> > The source jar is available at
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.2/
> >
> > sha512 is
> 28199a1eaff15f3c5b9a6d11467eb595a3c9e78bfde5e9e624ed9e4031d48cb86546c88836f92ac0040f30261a3081a7fa543959ef1489061de31ef5f27fcc5f
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care or not perfect
> > [-1] abort, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

[Gerhard Petracek]

+1

regards,
gerhard



Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:
>
> Hi lords and ladies!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2
>
> We fixed the following tickets
>
> Bug
> [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not 
> have the property 'xxx'
> [OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE
>
> Improvement
> [OWB-1434] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions
>
>
> The stating repo is here
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/
>
>
> The source jar is available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.2/
>
> sha512 is 
> 28199a1eaff15f3c5b9a6d11467eb595a3c9e78bfde5e9e624ed9e4031d48cb86546c88836f92ac0040f30261a3081a7fa543959ef1489061de31ef5f27fcc5f
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care or not perfect
> [-1] abort, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1

tested our applications and its working fine

Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:

> Hi lords and ladies!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2
>
> We fixed the following tickets
>
> Bug
> [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does
> not have the property 'xxx'
> [OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE
>
> Improvement
> [OWB-1434] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions
>
>
> The stating repo is here
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/
>
>
> The source jar is available at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.2/
>
> sha512 is
> 28199a1eaff15f3c5b9a6d11467eb595a3c9e78bfde5e9e624ed9e4031d48cb86546c88836f92ac0040f30261a3081a7fa543959ef1489061de31ef5f27fcc5f
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care or not perfect
> [-1] abort, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

[Mark Struberg]

Hi lords and ladies!

I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

We fixed the following tickets

Bug
[OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not 
have the property 'xxx'
[OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE

Improvement
[OWB-1434] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions


The stating repo is here

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/


The source jar is available at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1085/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.2/

sha512 is 
28199a1eaff15f3c5b9a6d11467eb595a3c9e78bfde5e9e624ed9e4031d48cb86546c88836f92ac0040f30261a3081a7fa543959ef1489061de31ef5f27fcc5f

Please VOTE

[+1] let's ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care or not perfect
[-1] abort, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h

txs and LieGrue,
strub

Re: rolling a release

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le lun. 29 janv. 2024 à 09:00, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> +1
>
> Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > hi folks!
> >
> > FYI, I gonna trigger a release now.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>

Re: rolling a release

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1

Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:

> hi folks!
>
> FYI, I gonna trigger a release now.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

rolling a release

[Mark Struberg]

hi folks!

FYI, I gonna trigger a release now.

LieGrue,
strub

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

[Mark Struberg]

and my own +1

Which makes it
+1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Mark

No -1 nor 0

txs for reviewing and voting!

Will continue with the release steps.

LieGrue,
strub




> Am 13.11.2023 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> +1
> 
> Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 07:16, Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
> daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 06:57 Thomas Andraschko >> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Mark Struberg  schrieb am Sa., 11. Nov. 2023,
>>> 20:09:
>>> 
>>>> Good afternoon!
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans 4.0.1
>>>> 
>>>> The following tickets got resolved:
>>>> Improvement
>>>> 
>>>> [OWB-1430 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1430>] -
>>>> BeanManagerBean should implement BeanContainer
>>>> [OWB-1431 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1431>] - upgrade
>>>> xbean to 4.24
>>>> [OWB-1432 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1432>] -
>>>> ClassCastException in ValidatingInjectionTargetFactory
>>>> [OWB-1433 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1433>] - upgrade
>>>> maven plugins and set Java version to 11
>>>> [OWB-1434 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade
>>>> various dependencies to more recent versions
>>>> [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade
>> to
>>>> apache parent 30
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The staging repo is
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/
>>>> 
>>>> The source release can be found here:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.1/
>>>> 
>>>> sha512 is
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 85cfd180ae29273ce6a96d9c5114de6b76a57a0066fb5f4a2daa9412754bde6ee2d2382a8bb986eeb86c3dee43f9b7f2b8b9dd1be61559031d6efcc8dfd18497
>>>> 
>>>> Please VOTE:
>>>> 
>>>> [+1] yup, ship it!
>>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>>> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
>>>> 
>>>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>>>> 
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 07:16, Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 06:57 Thomas Andraschko  >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Mark Struberg  schrieb am Sa., 11. Nov. 2023,
> > 20:09:
> >
> > > Good afternoon!
> > >
> > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans 4.0.1
> > >
> > > The following tickets got resolved:
> > > Improvement
> > >
> > > [OWB-1430 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1430>] -
> > > BeanManagerBean should implement BeanContainer
> > > [OWB-1431 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1431>] - upgrade
> > > xbean to 4.24
> > > [OWB-1432 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1432>] -
> > > ClassCastException in ValidatingInjectionTargetFactory
> > > [OWB-1433 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1433>] - upgrade
> > > maven plugins and set Java version to 11
> > > [OWB-1434 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade
> > > various dependencies to more recent versions
> > > [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade
> to
> > > apache parent 30
> > >
> > >
> > > The staging repo is
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/
> > >
> > > The source release can be found here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.1/
> > >
> > > sha512 is
> > >
> > >
> >
> 85cfd180ae29273ce6a96d9c5114de6b76a57a0066fb5f4a2daa9412754bde6ee2d2382a8bb986eeb86c3dee43f9b7f2b8b9dd1be61559031d6efcc8dfd18497
> > >
> > > Please VOTE:
> > >
> > > [+1] yup, ship it!
> > > [+0] meh, don't care
> > > [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> > >
> > > The VOTE is open for 72h
> > >
> > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hi,

+1

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 06:57 Thomas Andraschko 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Mark Struberg  schrieb am Sa., 11. Nov. 2023,
> 20:09:
>
> > Good afternoon!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans 4.0.1
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> > Improvement
> >
> > [OWB-1430 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1430>] -
> > BeanManagerBean should implement BeanContainer
> > [OWB-1431 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1431>] - upgrade
> > xbean to 4.24
> > [OWB-1432 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1432>] -
> > ClassCastException in ValidatingInjectionTargetFactory
> > [OWB-1433 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1433>] - upgrade
> > maven plugins and set Java version to 11
> > [OWB-1434 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade
> > various dependencies to more recent versions
> > [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade to
> > apache parent 30
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/
> >
> > The source release can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.1/
> >
> > sha512 is
> >
> >
> 85cfd180ae29273ce6a96d9c5114de6b76a57a0066fb5f4a2daa9412754bde6ee2d2382a8bb986eeb86c3dee43f9b7f2b8b9dd1be61559031d6efcc8dfd18497
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] yup, ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1

Mark Struberg  schrieb am Sa., 11. Nov. 2023,
20:09:

> Good afternoon!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans 4.0.1
>
> The following tickets got resolved:
> Improvement
>
> [OWB-1430 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1430>] -
> BeanManagerBean should implement BeanContainer
> [OWB-1431 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1431>] - upgrade
> xbean to 4.24
> [OWB-1432 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1432>] -
> ClassCastException in ValidatingInjectionTargetFactory
> [OWB-1433 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1433>] - upgrade
> maven plugins and set Java version to 11
> [OWB-1434 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade
> various dependencies to more recent versions
> [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade to
> apache parent 30
>
>
> The staging repo is
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/
>
> The source release can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.1/
>
> sha512 is
>
> 85cfd180ae29273ce6a96d9c5114de6b76a57a0066fb5f4a2daa9412754bde6ee2d2382a8bb986eeb86c3dee43f9b7f2b8b9dd1be61559031d6efcc8dfd18497
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] yup, ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

[Mark Struberg]

Good afternoon!

I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans 4.0.1

The following tickets got resolved:
Improvement

[OWB-1430 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1430>] - BeanManagerBean 
should implement BeanContainer
[OWB-1431 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1431>] - upgrade xbean to 
4.24
[OWB-1432 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1432>] - 
ClassCastException in ValidatingInjectionTargetFactory
[OWB-1433 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1433>] - upgrade maven 
plugins and set Java version to 11
[OWB-1434 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade various 
dependencies to more recent versions
[OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade to apache 
parent 30


The staging repo is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/

The source release can be found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.1/

sha512 is
85cfd180ae29273ce6a96d9c5114de6b76a57a0066fb5f4a2daa9412754bde6ee2d2382a8bb986eeb86c3dee43f9b7f2b8b9dd1be61559031d6efcc8dfd18497

Please VOTE:

[+1] yup, ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h

txs and LieGrue,
strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Mark Struberg]

Sure, good idea. Let's do that!
Happy if you could grab mw and do the update if you like.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 14.09.2023 um 14:29 schrieb Arne Limburg :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> congratulations for the release. Are there any plans to release meecrowave 
> with the new namespace anytime soon?
> Anything where I can help?
> 
> Cheers,
> Arne
> 
> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
> Poststra?e 1, 26122 Oldenburg
> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de 
> <mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de><mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
> http://www.openknowledge.de/<https://www.openknowledge.de/> 
> <http://www.openknowledge.de/%3Chttps://www.openknowledge.de/%3E>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Lars R?wekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
> Zu unseren Events<https://www.openknowledge.de/event/>
> 
> Von: Mark Struberg  <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>>
> Datum: Donnerstag, 7. September 2023 um 19:32
> An: openwebbeans-dev  <mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> Good afternoon!
> 
> 72h is over, time to tally the VOTE!
> 
> The following votes got casted:
> 
> +1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Richard, Mark
> No -1 nor 0
> 
> I'll continue with the release.
> Thanks to all who reviewed and voted!
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>> 
>> Hi folks!
>> 
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
>> This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
>> We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full EE 
>> TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
>> 
>> The following tickets got resolved:
>> 
>> Bug
>>   [OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the 
>> artifacts without classifier
>>   [OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
>>   [OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
>>   [OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
>>   [OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
>> 
>> Epic
>>   [OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
>> 
>> New Feature
>>   [OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
>> 
>> Improvement
>>   [OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
>> 
>> Task
>>   [OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
>> 
>> TCK Challenge
>>   [OWB-1419] - 
>> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
>>   [OWB-1420] - 
>> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
>>   [OWB-1421] - 
>> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
>>   [OWB-1422] - 
>> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
>>   [OWB-1424] - 
>> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
>> 
>> 
>> The staging repo is available at 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/>
>>  
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/%3Chttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/%3E>
>> 
>> The source zip can be found here: 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/>
>>  
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/%3Chttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/%3E>
>> 
>> sha512 is 
>> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please VOTE
>> [+1] yep, ship it!
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
>> 
>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>> 
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Arne Limburg]

OK, thanks. I’ll switch over to that list to see, where I can help.

Cheers,
Arne

OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg
Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
http://www.openknowledge.de/<https://www.openknowledge.de/>
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann

Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
Zu unseren Events<https://www.openknowledge.de/event/>

Von: Romain Manni-Bucau 
Datum: Donnerstag, 14. September 2023 um 14:41
An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
Guess the main "blocker" will be to await for johnzon 2.0.0 release ot
switch to a native jakarta stack.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> 
|  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old 
Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> | Github 
<https://github.com/rmannibucau<https://github.com/rmannibucau>> |
LinkedIn 
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>>
 | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>>


Le jeu. 14 sept. 2023 à 16:31, Arne Limburg 
a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> congratulations for the release. Are there any plans to release meecrowave
> with the new namespace anytime soon?
> Anything where I can help?
>
> Cheers,
> Arne
>
> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
> Poststra?e 1, 26122 Oldenburg
> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
> http://www.openknowledge.de/<https://www.openknowledge.de/><http://www.openknowledge.de/>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Lars R?wekamp, Jens Schumann
>
> Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
> Zu unseren 
> Events<https://www.openknowledge.de/event/<https://www.openknowledge.de/event/>>
>
> Von: Mark Struberg 
> Datum: Donnerstag, 7. September 2023 um 19:32
> An: openwebbeans-dev 
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> Good afternoon!
>
> 72h is over, time to tally the VOTE!
>
> The following votes got casted:
>
> +1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Richard, Mark
> No -1 nor 0
>
> I'll continue with the release.
> Thanks to all who reviewed and voted!
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full
> EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> >
> > Bug
> >[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the
> artifacts without classifier
> >[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
> >[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
> >[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
> >[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
> >
> > Epic
> >[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> >
> > New Feature
> >[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> >
> > Improvement
> >[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> >
> > Task
> >[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> >
> > TCK Challenge
> >[OWB-1419] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
> >[OWB-1420] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
> >[OWB-1421] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
> >[OWB-1422] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
> >[OWB-1424] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is available at
> https://reposi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Guess the main "blocker" will be to await for johnzon 2.0.0 release ot
switch to a native jakarta stack.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le jeu. 14 sept. 2023 à 16:31, Arne Limburg 
a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> congratulations for the release. Are there any plans to release meecrowave
> with the new namespace anytime soon?
> Anything where I can help?
>
> Cheers,
> Arne
>
> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
> Poststra?e 1, 26122 Oldenburg
> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
> http://www.openknowledge.de/<https://www.openknowledge.de/>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Lars R?wekamp, Jens Schumann
>
> Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
> Zu unseren Events<https://www.openknowledge.de/event/>
>
> Von: Mark Struberg 
> Datum: Donnerstag, 7. September 2023 um 19:32
> An: openwebbeans-dev 
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> Good afternoon!
>
> 72h is over, time to tally the VOTE!
>
> The following votes got casted:
>
> +1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Richard, Mark
> No -1 nor 0
>
> I'll continue with the release.
> Thanks to all who reviewed and voted!
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full
> EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> >
> > Bug
> >[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the
> artifacts without classifier
> >[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
> >[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
> >[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
> >[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
> >
> > Epic
> >[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> >
> > New Feature
> >[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> >
> > Improvement
> >[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> >
> > Task
> >[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> >
> > TCK Challenge
> >[OWB-1419] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
> >[OWB-1420] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
> >[OWB-1421] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
> >[OWB-1422] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
> >[OWB-1424] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> >
> >
> > The source zip can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> >
> >
> > sha512 is
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> >
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> > [+1] yep, ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
>

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Arne Limburg]

Hi all,

congratulations for the release. Are there any plans to release meecrowave with 
the new namespace anytime soon?
Anything where I can help?

Cheers,
Arne

OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
Poststra?e 1, 26122 Oldenburg
Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
http://www.openknowledge.de/<https://www.openknowledge.de/>
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Lars R?wekamp, Jens Schumann

Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
Zu unseren Events<https://www.openknowledge.de/event/>

Von: Mark Struberg 
Datum: Donnerstag, 7. September 2023 um 19:32
An: openwebbeans-dev 
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
Good afternoon!

72h is over, time to tally the VOTE!

The following votes got casted:

+1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Richard, Mark
No -1 nor 0

I'll continue with the release.
Thanks to all who reviewed and voted!

txs and LieGrue,
strub



> Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full EE TCK 
> will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
>
> The following tickets got resolved:
>
> Bug
>[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the 
> artifacts without classifier
>[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
>[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
>[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
>[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
>
> Epic
>[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
>
> New Feature
>[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
>
> Improvement
>[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
>
> Task
>[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
>
> TCK Challenge
>[OWB-1419] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
>[OWB-1420] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
>[OWB-1421] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
>[OWB-1422] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
>[OWB-1424] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
>
>
> The staging repo is available at 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/>
>
> The source zip can be found here: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/>
>
> sha512 is 
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
>
>
>
> Please VOTE
> [+1] yep, ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Mark Struberg]

Good afternoon!

72h is over, time to tally the VOTE!

The following votes got casted:

+1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Richard, Mark
No -1 nor 0

I'll continue with the release.
Thanks to all who reviewed and voted!

txs and LieGrue,
strub



> Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi folks!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full EE TCK 
> will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> 
> The following tickets got resolved:
> 
> Bug
>[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the 
> artifacts without classifier
>[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
>[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
>[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
>[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
> 
> Epic
>[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> 
> New Feature
>[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> 
> Improvement
>[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> 
> Task
>[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> 
> TCK Challenge
>[OWB-1419] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
>[OWB-1420] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
>[OWB-1421] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
>[OWB-1422] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
>[OWB-1424] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> 
> 
> The staging repo is available at 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> 
> The source zip can be found here: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> 
> sha512 is 
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> 
> 
> 
> Please VOTE
> [+1] yep, ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Richard Zowalla]

+1

Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 14:13 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg:
> Hi folks!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the
> full EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> 
> The following tickets got resolved:
> 
> Bug
>     [OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the
> artifacts without classifier
>     [OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the
> bean
>     [OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax
> namespace
>     [OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
>     [OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented
> interfaces
> 
> Epic
>     [OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> 
> New Feature
>     [OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> 
> Improvement
>     [OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> 
> Task
>     [OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> 
> TCK Challenge
>     [OWB-1419] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.Constru
> ctorInterceptionTest
>     [OWB-1420] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindi
> ngs.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
>     [OWB-1421] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorB
> indingOverridingTest
>     [OWB-1422] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinition
> Test
>     [OWB-1424] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.B
> uiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.conte
> xt.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTes
> t
> 
> 
> The staging repo is available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> 
> The source zip can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> 
> sha512 is
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff1705
> 4f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> 
> 
> 
> Please VOTE
> [+1] yep, ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 5 sept. 2023 à 19:21, Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 11:52 Thomas Andraschko 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> > :
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg
>  > > >:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks!
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> > > > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> > > > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the
> full
> > > EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> > > >
> > > > The following tickets got resolved:
> > > >
> > > > Bug
> > > >[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the
> > > artifacts without classifier
> > > >[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the
> bean
> > > >[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax
> namespace
> > > >[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
> > > >[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented
> > interfaces
> > > >
> > > > Epic
> > > >[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> > > >
> > > > New Feature
> > > >[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> > > >
> > > > Improvement
> > > >[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> > > >
> > > > Task
> > > >[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> > > >
> > > > TCK Challenge
> > > >[OWB-1419] -
> > >
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
> > > >[OWB-1420] -
> > >
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
> > > >[OWB-1421] -
> > >
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
> > > >[OWB-1422] -
> > >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
> > > >[OWB-1424] -
> > >
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The staging repo is available at
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> > > >
> > > > The source zip can be found here:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> > > >
> > > > sha512 is
> > >
> >
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please VOTE
> > > > [+1] yep, ship it!
> > > > [+0] meh, don't care
> > > > [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> > > >
> > > > The VOTE is open for 72h
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hi,

+1

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 11:52 Thomas Andraschko 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg  > >:
> > >
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> > > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> > > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full
> > EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> > >
> > > The following tickets got resolved:
> > >
> > > Bug
> > >[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the
> > artifacts without classifier
> > >[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
> > >[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
> > >[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
> > >[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented
> interfaces
> > >
> > > Epic
> > >[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> > >
> > > New Feature
> > >[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> > >
> > > Improvement
> > >[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> > >
> > > Task
> > >[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> > >
> > > TCK Challenge
> > >[OWB-1419] -
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
> > >[OWB-1420] -
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
> > >[OWB-1421] -
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
> > >[OWB-1422] -
> > org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
> > >[OWB-1424] -
> >
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> > >
> > >
> > > The staging repo is available at
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> > >
> > > The source zip can be found here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> > >
> > > sha512 is
> >
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please VOTE
> > > [+1] yep, ship it!
> > > [+0] meh, don't care
> > > [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> > >
> > > The VOTE is open for 72h
> > >
> > >
> > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1

Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:

> +1
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full
> EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> >
> > Bug
> >[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the
> artifacts without classifier
> >[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
> >[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
> >[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
> >[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
> >
> > Epic
> >[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> >
> > New Feature
> >[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> >
> > Improvement
> >[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> >
> > Task
> >[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> >
> > TCK Challenge
> >[OWB-1419] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
> >[OWB-1420] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
> >[OWB-1421] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
> >[OWB-1422] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
> >[OWB-1424] -
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> >
> > The source zip can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> >
> > sha512 is
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> >
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> > [+1] yep, ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Mark Struberg]

+1


LieGrue,
strub


> Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi folks!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
> This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
> We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full EE TCK 
> will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.
> 
> The following tickets got resolved:
> 
> Bug
>[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the 
> artifacts without classifier
>[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
>[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
>[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
>[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
> 
> Epic
>[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec
> 
> New Feature
>[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL
> 
> Improvement
>[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable
> 
> Task
>[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8
> 
> TCK Challenge
>[OWB-1419] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
>[OWB-1420] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
>[OWB-1421] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
>[OWB-1422] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
>[OWB-1424] - 
> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest
> 
> 
> The staging repo is available at 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/
> 
> The source zip can be found here: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/
> 
> sha512 is 
> 99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963
> 
> 
> 
> Please VOTE
> [+1] yep, ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

[Mark Struberg]

Hi folks!

I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0
This is the first release with the jakarta namespace.
We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full EE TCK 
will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project.

The following tickets got resolved:

Bug
[OWB-1368] - Maven artifacts with Jakarta classifier requires the artifacts 
without classifier
[OWB-1418] - @Priority on @Alternative @Stereotype enables the bean
[OWB-1423] - openwebbeans-impl-jakarta is using old javax namespace
[OWB-1425] - Interceptors not being called on UnmanagedInstance
[OWB-1426] - Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces

Epic
[OWB-1417] - Implement CDI-4.0 spec

New Feature
[OWB-1427] - Support for dotted bean names with EL

Improvement
[OWB-1428] - make default bean-discovery-mode configurable

Task
[OWB-1088] - fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8

TCK Challenge
[OWB-1419] - 
org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.aroundConstruct.ConstructorInterceptionTest
[OWB-1420] - 
org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.contract.lifecycleCallback.bindings.LifecycleInterceptorDefinitionTest
[OWB-1421] - 
org.jboss.cdi.tck.interceptors.tests.bindings.overriding.InterceptorBindingOverridingTest
[OWB-1422] - 
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.interceptors.definition.InterceptorDefinitionTest
[OWB-1424] - 
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTestorg.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.full.context.passivating.dependency.builtin.BuiltinBeanPassivationDependencyTest


The staging repo is available at 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/

The source zip can be found here: 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1083/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/4.0.0/

sha512 is 
99f470a2a64e98e292bc6e604377ed7c2f3c9b5593d40dfe079d6b16bf23df5ff17054f76ef0b3ee138d17dc611abdd89285496936f3674f1928c2c2c0faf963



Please VOTE
[+1] yep, ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] nah, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h


txs and LieGrue,
strub

Re: Gonna release the OWB master

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1

Am Mo., 4. Sept. 2023 um 12:07 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :

> +1
>
> Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 11:41 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg:
> > hi folks!
> >
> > I'll start an OWB release soon.
> > We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and
> > it is used in TomEE since then. DeltaSpike is also using it since
> > then and needs an OWB release to be able to release DeltaSpike. So
> > far no error or show stopper got reported, so I think we can safely
> > assume that the core at least works fine.
> > Note that OWB itself never passed the full CDI TCK in this project
> > but only as part of TomEE. So there is no problem to progress with
> > the release.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
>
>

Re: Gonna release the OWB master

[Richard Zowalla]

+1

Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 11:41 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg:
> hi folks!
> 
> I'll start an OWB release soon.
> We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and
> it is used in TomEE since then. DeltaSpike is also using it since
> then and needs an OWB release to be able to release DeltaSpike. So
> far no error or show stopper got reported, so I think we can safely
> assume that the core at least works fine.
> Note that OWB itself never passed the full CDI TCK in this project
> but only as part of TomEE. So there is no problem to progress with
> the release.
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub

Re: Gonna release the OWB master

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le lun. 4 sept. 2023 à 13:42, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> hi folks!
>
> I'll start an OWB release soon.
> We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and it
> is used in TomEE since then. DeltaSpike is also using it since then and
> needs an OWB release to be able to release DeltaSpike. So far no error or
> show stopper got reported, so I think we can safely assume that the core at
> least works fine.
> Note that OWB itself never passed the full CDI TCK in this project but
> only as part of TomEE. So there is no problem to progress with the release.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub

Gonna release the OWB master

[Mark Struberg]

hi folks!

I'll start an OWB release soon.
We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and it is 
used in TomEE since then. DeltaSpike is also using it since then and needs an 
OWB release to be able to release DeltaSpike. So far no error or show stopper 
got reported, so I think we can safely assume that the core at least works fine.
Note that OWB itself never passed the full CDI TCK in this project but only as 
part of TomEE. So there is no problem to progress with the release.

LieGrue,
strub

Re: Meecrowave Deps Update + Release?

[Richard Zowalla]

Hi Romain,

just did the OpenJPA update. Thx for the pointer.

Gruß
Richard

Am Freitag, dem 07.07.2023 um 16:51 +0200 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Think h2 upgrade will need openjpa 3.2.2 upgrade (think we supported
> h2 v2
> in 3.2.1 only).
> Rest looks ok to me.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-perfor
> mance>
> 
> 
> Le ven. 7 juil. 2023 à 15:23, Richard Zowalla  a
> écrit :
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > can someone take a look at [1] to get up 2 date dependencies into
> > Meecrowave?
> > 
> > I would love to see a version with updated deps soon? Any chance to
> > have a minor release soon?
> > 
> > Thanks & Gruß
> > Richard
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/pull/20
> > 

Re: Meecrowave Deps Update + Release?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi Richard,

Think h2 upgrade will need openjpa 3.2.2 upgrade (think we supported h2 v2
in 3.2.1 only).
Rest looks ok to me.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le ven. 7 juil. 2023 à 15:23, Richard Zowalla  a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> can someone take a look at [1] to get up 2 date dependencies into
> Meecrowave?
>
> I would love to see a version with updated deps soon? Any chance to
> have a minor release soon?
>
> Thanks & Gruß
> Richard
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/pull/20
>

Meecrowave Deps Update + Release?

[Richard Zowalla]

Hi,

can someone take a look at [1] to get up 2 date dependencies into
Meecrowave?

I would love to see a version with updated deps soon? Any chance to
have a minor release soon?

Thanks & Gruß
Richard



[1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/pull/20

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO]

Agree with Romain

Good or bad it is there in the spec. We need something to pass the suite
before we can call it done and go final in my opinion.

I'm ok if it requires a flag or if it's in another separated module. But it
has to be there somehow.

Le lun. 30 janv. 2023, 14:48, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
> * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
> * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including
> cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for
> me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi extension
> making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > all sounds good to me
> >
> > Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> > :
> >
> > > hi folks!
> > >
> > > We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> > > There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
> > >
> > > * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
> > > Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement
> the
> > > functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
> > > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> > > they assume a specified order class annotations before method
> annotations
> > > for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
> > with
> > > the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> > > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
> > > empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break
> the
> > > JakartaEE rules alltogether.
> > >
> > >
> > > Things I want to change yet before the release:
> > >
> > > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until
> someone
> > > wants to contribute fixes to it.
> > > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
> > > parts.
> > >
> > >
> > > Wdyt?
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Mark Struberg]

I've created a few tickets but not all yet. Just wanted to get the most 
obviously broken tests out of the way.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 09.02.2023 um 02:17 schrieb David Blevins :
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they 
>> assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for 
>> Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the 
>> same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> 
> Do you have links to the challenges you filed and does it look like they’ll 
> be accepted?
> 
> 
> -David
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Mark Struberg]

I'm fine with 11 as well, all runs really well and we don't use any feature 
from Java17. I did it mainly to push the boundaries a bit. Maybe I pushed too 
far ;)

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 09.02.2023 um 02:15 schrieb David Blevins :
> 
> Looks like we’ve set the Java version to 17.  I can confirm it does build 
> fine with 11.
> 
> Are we open to using 11 for 4.0.0 and waiting till the next release to go to 
> 17?
> 
> 
> -David
> 
> 
>> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
>> 
>> hi folks!
>> 
>> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
>> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
>> 
>> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for Quarkus 
>> and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the 
>> functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they 
>> assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for 
>> Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the 
>> same @Priority the order is unspecified.
>> * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for empty 
>> beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the JakartaEE 
>> rules alltogether.
>> 
>> 
>> Things I want to change yet before the release:
>> 
>> * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone 
>> wants to contribute fixes to it.
>> * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite parts.
>> 
>> 
>> Wdyt?
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

For reference:

> The TCKs will be compiled at the Java SE 11 level. In order to allow for
runtimes beyond Java SE 11, the TCK will also need to be (successfully)
executed with Java SE 17.

> How a Compatible Implementation supports the Java SE 11 runtime (or
above) will be left as a vendor-defined solution.

>
https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/jakartaee-platform/jakartaee10/JakartaEE10ReleasePlanFAQ#why-require-java-se-17-for-tck-execution

Which means only java 17 is a requirement of the specs even if java 11 is
ok-ish. Have to admit this is a very weird writing and it looks like people
disagreed so everything was put in the specs to make everyone happy so the
spec does not cover the actual requirement.

However since spec jars are java 11 I think it is ok to relax the compiler
settings.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le jeu. 9 févr. 2023 à 18:56, David Blevins  a
écrit :

> Both CDI 4.0 and the Jakarta EE Core/Webprofile/Platform specs all support
> Java 11 or higher in the spec and on the spec page.
>
>  - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/
>  - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/coreprofile/10/
>
>
> -David
>
> > On Feb 8, 2023, at 10:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Guess 17 is a prerequisite of the spec so no real choice afaik until we
> > dont comply to the api.
> > For j11/cdi3 our previous shades do the job.
> >
> > Tck filters+jira links are in the testng xml config if it helps.
> >
> > Romain
> >
> > Le jeu. 9 févr. 2023 à 02:17, David Blevins  a
> > écrit :
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
> >> wrote:
> >>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> >> they assume a specified order class annotations before method
> annotations
> >> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
> with
> >> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> >>
> >> Do you have links to the challenges you filed and does it look like
> >> they’ll be accepted?
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[David Blevins]

Both CDI 4.0 and the Jakarta EE Core/Webprofile/Platform specs all support Java 
11 or higher in the spec and on the spec page.

 - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/
 - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/coreprofile/10/


-David

> On Feb 8, 2023, at 10:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> Guess 17 is a prerequisite of the spec so no real choice afaik until we
> dont comply to the api.
> For j11/cdi3 our previous shades do the job.
> 
> Tck filters+jira links are in the testng xml config if it helps.
> 
> Romain
> 
> Le jeu. 9 févr. 2023 à 02:17, David Blevins  a
> écrit :
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
>> wrote:
>>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
>> they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations
>> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with
>> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
>> 
>> Do you have links to the challenges you filed and does it look like
>> they’ll be accepted?
>> 
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi David,

Guess 17 is a prerequisite of the spec so no real choice afaik until we
dont comply to the api.
For j11/cdi3 our previous shades do the job.

Tck filters+jira links are in the testng xml config if it helps.

Romain

Le jeu. 9 févr. 2023 à 02:17, David Blevins  a
écrit :

>
>
> > On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
> > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations
> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with
> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
>
> Do you have links to the challenges you filed and does it look like
> they’ll be accepted?
>
>
> -David
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[David Blevins]

> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they 
> assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for 
> Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the 
> same @Priority the order is unspecified.

Do you have links to the challenges you filed and does it look like they’ll be 
accepted?


-David

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[David Blevins]

Looks like we’ve set the Java version to 17.  I can confirm it does build fine 
with 11.

Are we open to using 11 for 4.0.0 and waiting till the next release to go to 17?


-David


> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
> 
> hi folks!
> 
> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
> 
> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for Quarkus 
> and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the 
> functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they 
> assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for 
> Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the 
> same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for empty 
> beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the JakartaEE 
> rules alltogether.
> 
> 
> Things I want to change yet before the release:
> 
> * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone 
> wants to contribute fixes to it.
> * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite parts.
> 
> 
> Wdyt?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Le mar. 31 janv. 2023 à 09:31, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> Already in the past we did not implement all features of the CDI spec in
> OWB. We left certain EE features defined in the CDI spec up to OpenEJB for
> example.What we did is to provide internal SPI to make this possible. As we
> do now. Imo all the necessary SPI should be in place. If something is
> missing I gonna add it. But I personally will not invest time in CDI-light.
> If you or anyone else wants to do it you are perfectly welcome. But I
> personally will not like to see us blocked for years to come by a trojan
> horse feature of imo not much use.
>

Please don't mix things up Mark:

1. You don't want to impl it -> once again it is more than fine, no issue,
2. OWB targets CDI standalone and servlet, nothing more but unfortunately
CDI lite is part of any CDI scope so we have to cover it, no SPI needed (it
is mainly a CDI extension) but must be supported OOTB to be a final release,
3. Nothing is blocked once again, doing an pre-release does not block
anything, just reflect the status of the project.

If we want to do a final which does not target CDI (current main) we have
to:

1. change the project scope and communicate about it
2. find a way to create our own API without ambiguity on jakarta one
3. find a way to validate applications at build time

3 can be a maven plugin to start, 1 is a matter of doing the homework and
waiting ~2months, 2 is almost impossible and failed each time it got tried
(our resource module, quarkus, ).
So I really think it would deserve the project to fake we are CDI 4 in our
releases.


>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 30.01.2023 um 23:23 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 21:27, Mark Struberg 
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> It's not the full story.
> >> We for example did never really implement the inconsistent BDA
> >> specification, global alternatives etc.
> >> Same here.
> >>
> >
> > But we implemented all api, here it is way more obvious it is wrong since
> > it is having CDI core dead api, nothing ambiguous as the bda so not the
> > same story at all IMHO.
> >
> >
> >> The CDI-4.0 situation is an inconsistent mess. Even Weld does not
> >> implement it fully it seems.
> >> I really don't want to be blocked by a mess in the spec.
> >>
> >
> > Strictly speaking it was a stupid spec decision but it is not a mess.
> > Make it optional, yes, but not missing in a final release targetting this
> > spec version. Literally means project goal we write on each report would
> > either be totally wrong or we freeze the project to jakartaee 9.
> >
> > Both are wrong IMHO on the community+project sides.
> >
> >
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 30.01.2023 um 19:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg  >> <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did
> never
> >>>> claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we
> >> in
> >>>> the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and
> >>>> report/challenge TCK tests which disrespect/contradict the spec
> wording
> >>>> and/or JavaDoc of the API. Most of those challenge tickets have been
> >>>> bulk-closed and never really addressed for the past CDI versions. So
> my
> >>>> will to go hunt for the carrot in front of my nose is not infinite
> >>>> ("endenwollend" as we say here in Vienna).
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> We always went the spec side even if we add toggles to disable/enable
> >>> things, but ultimately we cover the full API.
> >>> Not providing any way to get it means we don't implement CDI anymore,
> >>> nothing else. Can be fine but should be promoted and we should also see
> >>> with TomEE what it means for them.
> >>> Holding a release is not a goal but doing a final which looks like it
> >>> covers the spec whereas it does not cover a third of it would be way
> more
> >>> negative for the project IMHO so let's not be the bad guys and just
> >> expose
> >>> explicitly our state with a pre-final whatever name fits for you.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If someone wants to address/implement the CDI-lite func

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Mark Struberg]

Already in the past we did not implement all features of the CDI spec in OWB. 
We left certain EE features defined in the CDI spec up to OpenEJB for 
example.What we did is to provide internal SPI to make this possible. As we do 
now. Imo all the necessary SPI should be in place. If something is missing I 
gonna add it. But I personally will not invest time in CDI-light. If you or 
anyone else wants to do it you are perfectly welcome. But I personally will not 
like to see us blocked for years to come by a trojan horse feature of imo not 
much use.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 30.01.2023 um 23:23 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 21:27, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
> 
>> It's not the full story.
>> We for example did never really implement the inconsistent BDA
>> specification, global alternatives etc.
>> Same here.
>> 
> 
> But we implemented all api, here it is way more obvious it is wrong since
> it is having CDI core dead api, nothing ambiguous as the bda so not the
> same story at all IMHO.
> 
> 
>> The CDI-4.0 situation is an inconsistent mess. Even Weld does not
>> implement it fully it seems.
>> I really don't want to be blocked by a mess in the spec.
>> 
> 
> Strictly speaking it was a stupid spec decision but it is not a mess.
> Make it optional, yes, but not missing in a final release targetting this
> spec version. Literally means project goal we write on each report would
> either be totally wrong or we freeze the project to jakartaee 9.
> 
> Both are wrong IMHO on the community+project sides.
> 
> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 30.01.2023 um 19:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >> :
>>> 
>>> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg > <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> a
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>>> I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never
>>>> claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we
>> in
>>>> the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and
>>>> report/challenge TCK tests which disrespect/contradict the spec wording
>>>> and/or JavaDoc of the API. Most of those challenge tickets have been
>>>> bulk-closed and never really addressed for the past CDI versions. So my
>>>> will to go hunt for the carrot in front of my nose is not infinite
>>>> ("endenwollend" as we say here in Vienna).
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> We always went the spec side even if we add toggles to disable/enable
>>> things, but ultimately we cover the full API.
>>> Not providing any way to get it means we don't implement CDI anymore,
>>> nothing else. Can be fine but should be promoted and we should also see
>>> with TomEE what it means for them.
>>> Holding a release is not a goal but doing a final which looks like it
>>> covers the spec whereas it does not cover a third of it would be way more
>>> negative for the project IMHO so let's not be the bad guys and just
>> expose
>>> explicitly our state with a pre-final whatever name fits for you.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If someone wants to address/implement the CDI-lite functionality (s)he
>> is
>>>> perfectly welcome to do so. I doubt I will find the time to do it.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Once again, no issue to not do it now, should just be a goal of 4.0.0.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 30.01.2023 um 14:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>> :
>>>>> 
>>>>> * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
>>>>> * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
>>>>> * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant -
>> including
>>>>> cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum
>> for
>>>>> me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi
>>>> extension
>>>>> making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuc

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 21:27, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> It's not the full story.
> We for example did never really implement the inconsistent BDA
> specification, global alternatives etc.
> Same here.
>

But we implemented all api, here it is way more obvious it is wrong since
it is having CDI core dead api, nothing ambiguous as the bda so not the
same story at all IMHO.


> The CDI-4.0 situation is an inconsistent mess. Even Weld does not
> implement it fully it seems.
> I really don't want to be blocked by a mess in the spec.
>

Strictly speaking it was a stupid spec decision but it is not a mess.
Make it optional, yes, but not missing in a final release targetting this
spec version. Literally means project goal we write on each report would
either be totally wrong or we freeze the project to jakartaee 9.

Both are wrong IMHO on the community+project sides.


> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 30.01.2023 um 19:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg  <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never
> >> claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we
> in
> >> the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and
> >> report/challenge TCK tests which disrespect/contradict the spec wording
> >> and/or JavaDoc of the API. Most of those challenge tickets have been
> >> bulk-closed and never really addressed for the past CDI versions. So my
> >> will to go hunt for the carrot in front of my nose is not infinite
> >> ("endenwollend" as we say here in Vienna).
> >>
> >
> > We always went the spec side even if we add toggles to disable/enable
> > things, but ultimately we cover the full API.
> > Not providing any way to get it means we don't implement CDI anymore,
> > nothing else. Can be fine but should be promoted and we should also see
> > with TomEE what it means for them.
> > Holding a release is not a goal but doing a final which looks like it
> > covers the spec whereas it does not cover a third of it would be way more
> > negative for the project IMHO so let's not be the bad guys and just
> expose
> > explicitly our state with a pre-final whatever name fits for you.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> If someone wants to address/implement the CDI-lite functionality (s)he
> is
> >> perfectly welcome to do so. I doubt I will find the time to do it.
> >>
> >
> > Once again, no issue to not do it now, should just be a goal of 4.0.0.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>> Am 30.01.2023 um 14:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
> >>> * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
> >>> * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant -
> including
> >>> cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum
> for
> >>> me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi
> >> extension
> >>> making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >>> <
> >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko <
> >>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> all sounds good to me
> >>>>
> >>>> Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> >>>> :
> >>>>
> >>>>> hi folks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> >>>>> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
> >>>>> Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement
> >> the
> >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Mark Struberg]

It's not the full story. 
We for example did never really implement the inconsistent BDA specification, 
global alternatives etc. 
Same here.

The CDI-4.0 situation is an inconsistent mess. Even Weld does not implement it 
fully it seems.
I really don't want to be blocked by a mess in the spec.

LieGrue,
strub



> Am 30.01.2023 um 19:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg  <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> a
> écrit :
> 
>> I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never
>> claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we in
>> the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and
>> report/challenge TCK tests which disrespect/contradict the spec wording
>> and/or JavaDoc of the API. Most of those challenge tickets have been
>> bulk-closed and never really addressed for the past CDI versions. So my
>> will to go hunt for the carrot in front of my nose is not infinite
>> ("endenwollend" as we say here in Vienna).
>> 
> 
> We always went the spec side even if we add toggles to disable/enable
> things, but ultimately we cover the full API.
> Not providing any way to get it means we don't implement CDI anymore,
> nothing else. Can be fine but should be promoted and we should also see
> with TomEE what it means for them.
> Holding a release is not a goal but doing a final which looks like it
> covers the spec whereas it does not cover a third of it would be way more
> negative for the project IMHO so let's not be the bad guys and just expose
> explicitly our state with a pre-final whatever name fits for you.
> 
> 
>> 
>> If someone wants to address/implement the CDI-lite functionality (s)he is
>> perfectly welcome to do so. I doubt I will find the time to do it.
>> 
> 
> Once again, no issue to not do it now, should just be a goal of 4.0.0.
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>>> Am 30.01.2023 um 14:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >> :
>>> 
>>> * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
>>> * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
>>> * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including
>>> cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for
>>> me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi
>> extension
>>> making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko <
>>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> all sounds good to me
>>>> 
>>>> Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
>>>> :
>>>> 
>>>>> hi folks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
>>>>> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
>>>>> Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement
>> the
>>>>> functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
>>>>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
>>>>> they assume a specified order class annotations before method
>> annotations
>>>>> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
>>>> with
>>>>> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
>>>>> * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
>>>>> empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break
>> the
>>>>> JakartaEE rules alltogether.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Things I want to change yet before the release:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until
>> someone
>>>>> wants to contribute fixes to it.
>>>>> * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
>>>>> parts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>> 
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never
> claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we in
> the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and
> report/challenge TCK tests which disrespect/contradict the spec wording
> and/or JavaDoc of the API. Most of those challenge tickets have been
> bulk-closed and never really addressed for the past CDI versions. So my
> will to go hunt for the carrot in front of my nose is not infinite
> ("endenwollend" as we say here in Vienna).
>

We always went the spec side even if we add toggles to disable/enable
things, but ultimately we cover the full API.
Not providing any way to get it means we don't implement CDI anymore,
nothing else. Can be fine but should be promoted and we should also see
with TomEE what it means for them.
Holding a release is not a goal but doing a final which looks like it
covers the spec whereas it does not cover a third of it would be way more
negative for the project IMHO so let's not be the bad guys and just expose
explicitly our state with a pre-final whatever name fits for you.


>
> If someone wants to address/implement the CDI-lite functionality (s)he is
> perfectly welcome to do so. I doubt I will find the time to do it.
>

Once again, no issue to not do it now, should just be a goal of 4.0.0.


>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 30.01.2023 um 14:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
> > * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
> > * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including
> > cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for
> > me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi
> extension
> > making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> all sounds good to me
> >>
> >> Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> >> :
> >>
> >>> hi folks!
> >>>
> >>> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> >>> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
> >>>
> >>> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
> >>> Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement
> the
> >>> functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
> >>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> >>> they assume a specified order class annotations before method
> annotations
> >>> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
> >> with
> >>> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> >>> * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
> >>> empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break
> the
> >>> JakartaEE rules alltogether.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Things I want to change yet before the release:
> >>>
> >>> * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until
> someone
> >>> wants to contribute fixes to it.
> >>> * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
> >>> parts.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Wdyt?
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Mark Struberg]

I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never claim 
to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we in the future. 
We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and report/challenge TCK 
tests which disrespect/contradict the spec wording and/or JavaDoc of the API. 
Most of those challenge tickets have been bulk-closed and never really 
addressed for the past CDI versions. So my will to go hunt for the carrot in 
front of my nose is not infinite ("endenwollend" as we say here in Vienna).

If someone wants to address/implement the CDI-lite functionality (s)he is 
perfectly welcome to do so. I doubt I will find the time to do it.


LieGrue,
strub

> Am 30.01.2023 um 14:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
> * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
> * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including
> cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for
> me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi extension
> making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
>> all sounds good to me
>> 
>> Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
>> :
>> 
>>> hi folks!
>>> 
>>> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
>>> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
>>> 
>>> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
>>> Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the
>>> functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
>>> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
>>> they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations
>>> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
>> with
>>> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
>>> * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
>>> empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the
>>> JakartaEE rules alltogether.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Things I want to change yet before the release:
>>> 
>>> * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone
>>> wants to contribute fixes to it.
>>> * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
>>> parts.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Wdyt?
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

* +1 to drop jetty plugin for now
* +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway)
* -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including
cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for
me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi extension
making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> all sounds good to me
>
> Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > hi folks!
> >
> > We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> > There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
> >
> > * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
> > Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the
> > functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
> > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> > they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations
> > for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
> with
> > the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
> > empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the
> > JakartaEE rules alltogether.
> >
> >
> > Things I want to change yet before the release:
> >
> > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone
> > wants to contribute fixes to it.
> > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
> > parts.
> >
> >
> > Wdyt?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hi,

It's good for me too.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023, 10:43 Thomas Andraschko 
wrote:

> all sounds good to me
>
> Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > hi folks!
> >
> > We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> > There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
> >
> > * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
> > Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the
> > functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
> > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> > they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations
> > for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors
> with
> > the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
> > empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the
> > JakartaEE rules alltogether.
> >
> >
> > Things I want to change yet before the release:
> >
> > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone
> > wants to contribute fixes to it.
> > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
> > parts.
> >
> >
> > Wdyt?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Thomas Andraschko]

all sounds good to me

Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:

> hi folks!
>
> We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
> There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:
>
> * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for
> Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the
> functionality as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g.
> they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations
> for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with
> the same @Priority the order is unspecified.
> * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for
> empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the
> JakartaEE rules alltogether.
>
>
> Things I want to change yet before the release:
>
> * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone
> wants to contribute fixes to it.
> * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite
> parts.
>
>
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>

[DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

[Mark Struberg]

hi folks!

We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests.
There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests:

* CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for Quarkus 
and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the functionality 
as  OWB plugin if someone really needs it though.
* Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they 
assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for 
Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the 
same @Priority the order is unspecified.
* backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for empty 
beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the JakartaEE 
rules alltogether.


Things I want to change yet before the release:

* Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone wants 
to contribute fixes to it.
* provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite parts.


Wdyt?

LieGrue,
strub

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

[Mark Struberg]

Hi!

Sorry for taking so long!

The VOTE is closed with 4 +1:
Reinhard, Romain, Jean-Babtiste, Mark

I'll continue with the release steps.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

> Am 29.12.2022 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> hi!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.15
> 
> We've mostly done version upgrades. Including to the latest CXF version.
> 
> The following tickets got resoled:
> Task
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-321 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-321>] - 
> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.19
> [MEECROWAVE-322 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-322>] - 
> Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.27
> [MEECROWAVE-324 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - 
> upgrade apache parent to 29
> [MEECROWAVE-325 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - 
> Update to CXF-3.5.5
> [MEECROWAVE-326 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - 
> Upgrade to log4j2-2.19.0
> 
> The staging repo is at 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/
> 
> The source release can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/
> sha512 is 
> 95299bee270bcdc931c9ad10da84e1bb0778b544845a15c908cd8f4fac9afa2ccb9f9827c82e0c03c0a8d355b258f702accd07423a4a743c43ff7f925640523d
> 
> My KEY can be found in our repo.
> 
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [+1] yikes no, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> Here is my own +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

[Reinhard Sandtner]

+1

lg
reini

> Am 09.01.2023 um 17:03 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> +1
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> | 
> Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le ven. 30 déc. 2022 à 06:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a
> écrit :
> 
>> +1 (non binding)
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:57 PM Mark Struberg 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> hi!
>>> 
>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.15
>>> 
>>> We've mostly done version upgrades. Including to the latest CXF version.
>>> 
>>> The following tickets got resoled:
>>> Task
>>> 
>>>   - [MEECROWAVE-321
>>>   <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-321>] - Upgrade to
>>>   Johnzon 1.2.19
>>>   - [MEECROWAVE-322
>>>   <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-322>] - Upgrade to
>>>   OpenWebBeans 2.0.27
>>>   - [MEECROWAVE-324
>>>   <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - upgrade
>>>   apache parent to 29
>>>   - [MEECROWAVE-325
>>>   <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - Update to
>>>   CXF-3.5.5
>>>   - [MEECROWAVE-326
>>>   <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - Upgrade to
>>>   log4j2-2.19.0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The staging repo is at
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/
>>> 
>>> The source release can be found at
>>> Index of
>>> /repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>>> repository.apache.org <http://repository.apache.org/>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>>> [image: favicon.png]
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>>> 
>>> sha512
>>> is 
>>> 95299bee270bcdc931c9ad10da84e1bb0778b544845a15c908cd8f4fac9afa2ccb9f9827c82e0c03c0a8d355b258f702accd07423a4a743c43ff7f925640523d
>>> 
>>> My KEY can be found in our repo.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please VOTE:
>>> 
>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>> [+1] yikes no, there is a ${showstopper}
>>> 
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>> 
>>> Here is my own +1
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le ven. 30 déc. 2022 à 06:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  a
écrit :

> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:57 PM Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
>
>> hi!
>>
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.15
>>
>> We've mostly done version upgrades. Including to the latest CXF version.
>>
>> The following tickets got resoled:
>> Task
>>
>>- [MEECROWAVE-321
>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-321>] - Upgrade to
>>Johnzon 1.2.19
>>- [MEECROWAVE-322
>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-322>] - Upgrade to
>>OpenWebBeans 2.0.27
>>- [MEECROWAVE-324
>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - upgrade
>>apache parent to 29
>>- [MEECROWAVE-325
>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - Update to
>>CXF-3.5.5
>>- [MEECROWAVE-326
>>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - Upgrade to
>>log4j2-2.19.0
>>
>>
>> The staging repo is at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/
>>
>> The source release can be found at
>> Index of
>> /repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>> repository.apache.org
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>> [image: favicon.png]
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>>
>> sha512
>> is 
>> 95299bee270bcdc931c9ad10da84e1bb0778b544845a15c908cd8f4fac9afa2ccb9f9827c82e0c03c0a8d355b258f702accd07423a4a743c43ff7f925640523d
>>
>> My KEY can be found in our repo.
>>
>>
>> Please VOTE:
>>
>> [+1] let's ship it!
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> [+1] yikes no, there is a ${showstopper}
>>
>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>
>> Here is my own +1
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:57 PM Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> hi!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.15
>
> We've mostly done version upgrades. Including to the latest CXF version.
>
> The following tickets got resoled:
> Task
>
>- [MEECROWAVE-321
><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-321>] - Upgrade to
>Johnzon 1.2.19
>- [MEECROWAVE-322
><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-322>] - Upgrade to
>OpenWebBeans 2.0.27
>- [MEECROWAVE-324
><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - upgrade
>apache parent to 29
>- [MEECROWAVE-325
><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - Update to
>CXF-3.5.5
>- [MEECROWAVE-326
><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - Upgrade to
>log4j2-2.19.0
>
>
> The staging repo is at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/
>
> The source release can be found at
> Index of
> /repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
> repository.apache.org
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
> [image: favicon.png]
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/>
>
> sha512
> is 
> 95299bee270bcdc931c9ad10da84e1bb0778b544845a15c908cd8f4fac9afa2ccb9f9827c82e0c03c0a8d355b258f702accd07423a4a743c43ff7f925640523d
>
> My KEY can be found in our repo.
>
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [+1] yikes no, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
> Here is my own +1
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

[Mark Struberg]

hi!

I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.15

We've mostly done version upgrades. Including to the latest CXF version.

The following tickets got resoled:
Task

[MEECROWAVE-321 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-321>] - 
Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.19
[MEECROWAVE-322 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-322>] - 
Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.27
[MEECROWAVE-324 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - 
upgrade apache parent to 29
[MEECROWAVE-325 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - 
Update to CXF-3.5.5
[MEECROWAVE-326 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - 
Upgrade to log4j2-2.19.0

The staging repo is at 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/

The source release can be found at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.15/
sha512 is 
95299bee270bcdc931c9ad10da84e1bb0778b544845a15c908cd8f4fac9afa2ccb9f9827c82e0c03c0a8d355b258f702accd07423a4a743c43ff7f925640523d

My KEY can be found in our repo.


Please VOTE:

[+1] let's ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[+1] yikes no, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h.

Here is my own +1

txs and LieGrue,
strub

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO]

Go ahead. Thanks

Le mer. 21 déc. 2022, 14:51, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> Ok,
>
> just checked and seems we are good just upgrading the version this time
> so +1
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mer. 21 déc. 2022 à 14:15, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > +1 it's easy to upgrade CXF but I'd like to get the CVE solved
> officially.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > > Am 20.12.2022 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> > >
> > > I guess 3.5.5 which includes some CVE fixes.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:20, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > >> Hi Mark,
> > >>
> > >> Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5?
> > >> Seems not done on master but we need to check deps  chnages before
> > since we
> > >> must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree.
> > >>
> > >> Romain
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg  >
> > a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow
> with
> > >> an
> > >>> updated CXF.
> > >>>
> > >>> You've got about 12h to stop me ;)
> > >>>
> > >>> txs and LieGrue,
> > >>> strub
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Ok,

just checked and seems we are good just upgrading the version this time
so +1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mer. 21 déc. 2022 à 14:15, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> +1 it's easy to upgrade CXF but I'd like to get the CVE solved officially.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 20.12.2022 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> >
> > I guess 3.5.5 which includes some CVE fixes.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:20, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> Hi Mark,
> >>
> >> Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5?
> >> Seems not done on master but we need to check deps  chnages before
> since we
> >> must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree.
> >>
> >> Romain
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg 
> a
> >> écrit :
> >>
> >>> I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with
> >> an
> >>> updated CXF.
> >>>
> >>> You've got about 12h to stop me ;)
> >>>
> >>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

[Mark Struberg]

+1 it's easy to upgrade CXF but I'd like to get the CVE solved officially.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 20.12.2022 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> 
> I guess 3.5.5 which includes some CVE fixes.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:20, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
> écrit :
> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5?
>> Seems not done on master but we need to check deps  chnages before since we
>> must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree.
>> 
>> Romain
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg  a
>> écrit :
>> 
>>> I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with
>> an
>>> updated CXF.
>>> 
>>> You've got about 12h to stop me ;)
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

I guess 3.5.5 which includes some CVE fixes.

Regards
JB

Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:20, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> Hi Mark,
>
> Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5?
> Seems not done on master but we need to check deps  chnages before since we
> must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree.
>
> Romain
>
>
>
> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with
> an
> > updated CXF.
> >
> > You've got about 12h to stop me ;)
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi Mark,

Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5?
Seems not done on master but we need to check deps  chnages before since we
must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree.

Romain



Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with an
> updated CXF.
>
> You've got about 12h to stop me ;)
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

[DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

[Mark Struberg]

I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with an 
updated CXF.

You've got about 12h to stop me ;)

txs and LieGrue,
strub

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

[Mark Struberg]

hi!

The VOTE did pass with the following:

+1: Romain, Jean-Baptiste, Reini, Mark

No -1 nor 0 got casted.

I'll continue with the release steps.

txs and LieGrue,
strub


> Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi lords and ladies!
> 
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14
> 
> Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is currently 
> under release as well.
> Information can be found here: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh 
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh>
> 
> 
> The following tickets got fixed:
> Improvement
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-307 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-307>] - 
> Upgrade to cxf 3.5.0
> [MEECROWAVE-308 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-308>] - 
> Upgrade to log4j 2.17.0
> [MEECROWAVE-309 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-309>] - 
> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.18
> [MEECROWAVE-310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-310>] - 
> Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.58
> [MEECROWAVE-311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-311>] - 
> Upgrade to Log4j 2.17.1
> Task
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-312>] - 
> Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.59
> [MEECROWAVE-313 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-313>] - 
> Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.26
> [MEECROWAVE-314 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-314>] - 
> Upgrade to CXF 3.5.1
> [MEECROWAVE-315 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-315>] - 
> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.16
> [MEECROWAVE-316 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-316>] - 
> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.60
> [MEECROWAVE-318 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-318>] - CXF 
> 3.5.2
> [MEECROWAVE-319 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-319>] - 
> Log4j 2.17.2
> [MEECROWAVE-320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-320>] - 
> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.17
> 
> 
> The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/>
> 
> The source zip can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/>
> sha1 is 5c53e44ba31213a46e6e05083ffb8f90e665be45
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

[Reinhard Sandtner]

+1

lg
reini

> Am 04.05.2022 um 09:14 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> 
> +1 (non binding)
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 1:40 PM Mark Struberg  
> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>>> 
>>> Hi lords and ladies!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14
>>> 
>>> Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is 
>>> currently under release as well.
>>> Information can be found here:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh 
>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The following tickets got fixed:
>>> Improvement
>>> 
>>> [MEECROWAVE-307 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-307>] - 
>>> Upgrade to cxf 3.5.0
>>> [MEECROWAVE-308 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-308>] - 
>>> Upgrade to log4j 2.17.0
>>> [MEECROWAVE-309 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-309>] - 
>>> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.18
>>> [MEECROWAVE-310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-310>] - 
>>> Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.58
>>> [MEECROWAVE-311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-311>] - 
>>> Upgrade to Log4j 2.17.1
>>> Task
>>> 
>>> [MEECROWAVE-312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-312>] - 
>>> Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.59
>>> [MEECROWAVE-313 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-313>] - 
>>> Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.26
>>> [MEECROWAVE-314 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-314>] - 
>>> Upgrade to CXF 3.5.1
>>> [MEECROWAVE-315 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-315>] - 
>>> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.16
>>> [MEECROWAVE-316 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-316>] - 
>>> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.60
>>> [MEECROWAVE-318 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-318>] - 
>>> CXF 3.5.2
>>> [MEECROWAVE-319 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-319>] - 
>>> Log4j 2.17.2
>>> [MEECROWAVE-320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-320>] - 
>>> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.17
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The staging repo is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/
>>>  
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/>
>>> 
>>> The source zip can be found at
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
>>>  
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/>
>>> sha1 is 5c53e44ba31213a46e6e05083ffb8f90e665be45
>>> 
>>> Please VOTE:
>>> 
>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>> [-1] nope, there is a ${showstopper}
>>> 
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 1:40 PM Mark Struberg  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> >
> > Hi lords and ladies!
> >
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14
> >
> > Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is 
> > currently under release as well.
> > Information can be found here:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh 
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh>
> >
> >
> > The following tickets got fixed:
> > Improvement
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-307 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-307>] - 
> > Upgrade to cxf 3.5.0
> > [MEECROWAVE-308 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-308>] - 
> > Upgrade to log4j 2.17.0
> > [MEECROWAVE-309 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-309>] - 
> > Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.18
> > [MEECROWAVE-310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-310>] - 
> > Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.58
> > [MEECROWAVE-311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-311>] - 
> > Upgrade to Log4j 2.17.1
> > Task
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-312>] - 
> > Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.59
> > [MEECROWAVE-313 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-313>] - 
> > Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.26
> > [MEECROWAVE-314 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-314>] - 
> > Upgrade to CXF 3.5.1
> > [MEECROWAVE-315 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-315>] - 
> > Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.16
> > [MEECROWAVE-316 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-316>] - 
> > Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.60
> > [MEECROWAVE-318 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-318>] - 
> > CXF 3.5.2
> > [MEECROWAVE-319 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-319>] - 
> > Log4j 2.17.2
> > [MEECROWAVE-320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-320>] - 
> > Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.17
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/
> >  
> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/>
> >
> > The source zip can be found at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
> >  
> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/>
> > sha1 is 5c53e44ba31213a46e6e05083ffb8f90e665be45
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 3 mai 2022 à 13:41, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > Hi lords and ladies!
> >
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14
> >
> > Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is
> currently under release as well.
> > Information can be found here:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh>
> >
> >
> > The following tickets got fixed:
> > Improvement
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-307 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-307>]
> - Upgrade to cxf 3.5.0
> > [MEECROWAVE-308 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-308>]
> - Upgrade to log4j 2.17.0
> > [MEECROWAVE-309 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-309>]
> - Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.18
> > [MEECROWAVE-310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-310>]
> - Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.58
> > [MEECROWAVE-311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-311>]
> - Upgrade to Log4j 2.17.1
> > Task
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-312>]
> - Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.59
> > [MEECROWAVE-313 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-313>]
> - Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.26
> > [MEECROWAVE-314 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-314>]
> - Upgrade to CXF 3.5.1
> > [MEECROWAVE-315 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-315>]
> - Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.16
> > [MEECROWAVE-316 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-316>]
> - Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.60
> > [MEECROWAVE-318 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-318>]
> - CXF 3.5.2
> > [MEECROWAVE-319 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-319>]
> - Log4j 2.17.2
> > [MEECROWAVE-320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-320>]
> - Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.17
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/
> >
> >
> > The source zip can be found at
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
> >
> > sha1 is 5c53e44ba31213a46e6e05083ffb8f90e665be45
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

[Mark Struberg]

+1

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi lords and ladies!
> 
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14
> 
> Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is currently 
> under release as well.
> Information can be found here: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh 
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh>
> 
> 
> The following tickets got fixed:
> Improvement
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-307 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-307>] - 
> Upgrade to cxf 3.5.0
> [MEECROWAVE-308 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-308>] - 
> Upgrade to log4j 2.17.0
> [MEECROWAVE-309 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-309>] - 
> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.18
> [MEECROWAVE-310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-310>] - 
> Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.58
> [MEECROWAVE-311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-311>] - 
> Upgrade to Log4j 2.17.1
> Task
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-312>] - 
> Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.59
> [MEECROWAVE-313 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-313>] - 
> Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.26
> [MEECROWAVE-314 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-314>] - 
> Upgrade to CXF 3.5.1
> [MEECROWAVE-315 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-315>] - 
> Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.16
> [MEECROWAVE-316 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-316>] - 
> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.60
> [MEECROWAVE-318 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-318>] - CXF 
> 3.5.2
> [MEECROWAVE-319 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-319>] - 
> Log4j 2.17.2
> [MEECROWAVE-320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-320>] - 
> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.17
> 
> 
> The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/>
> 
> The source zip can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/>
> sha1 is 5c53e44ba31213a46e6e05083ffb8f90e665be45
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

[Mark Struberg]

Hi lords and ladies!


I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is currently 
under release as well.
Information can be found here: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh 
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh>


The following tickets got fixed:
Improvement

[MEECROWAVE-307 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-307>] - 
Upgrade to cxf 3.5.0
[MEECROWAVE-308 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-308>] - 
Upgrade to log4j 2.17.0
[MEECROWAVE-309 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-309>] - 
Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.18
[MEECROWAVE-310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-310>] - 
Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.58
[MEECROWAVE-311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-311>] - 
Upgrade to Log4j 2.17.1
Task

[MEECROWAVE-312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-312>] - 
Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.59
[MEECROWAVE-313 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-313>] - 
Upgrade to OpenWebBeans 2.0.26
[MEECROWAVE-314 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-314>] - 
Upgrade to CXF 3.5.1
[MEECROWAVE-315 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-315>] - 
Upgrade to Johnzon 1.2.16
[MEECROWAVE-316 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-316>] - 
Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.60
[MEECROWAVE-318 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-318>] - CXF 
3.5.2
[MEECROWAVE-319 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-319>] - Log4j 
2.17.2
[MEECROWAVE-320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-320>] - 
Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.17


The staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/ 
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/>

The source zip can be found at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/
 
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1080/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.14/>
sha1 is 5c53e44ba31213a46e6e05083ffb8f90e665be45

Please VOTE:

[+1] let's ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] nope, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h

LieGrue,
strub

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Sounds good

Le ven. 29 avr. 2022 à 11:36, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> Johnzon is pretty much ready. Will likely start a release soonish and then
> immediately also run the release tasks for MW, ok?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 26.04.2022 um 12:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Well it is a matter of a week, since we didn't release for upgrades since
> > the beginning of the year and several were containing CVE fixes - but all
> > upgradable without patching our code - I don't think we have to urge so
> we
> > can likely wait for it and not chain releases which is always perceived
> as
> > a negative sign (bad quality) even if it is not in practise.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 11:03, Mark Struberg 
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> I read it and it doesn't sound like that is something which is just
> around
> >> the corner.
> >> So I'd rather release mw now and let's do a follow up release in a few
> >> weeks?
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 26.04.2022 um 10:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Can we await for David's fix on johnzon? Would love to get that out
> ASAP,
> >>> should be max a week I think.
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >>> <
> >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 09:18, Mark Struberg  >
> >> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Hi folks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Any reason not to start a mw release today?
> >>>> We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it.
> >>>>
> >>>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>>> strub
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

[Mark Struberg]

Johnzon is pretty much ready. Will likely start a release soonish and then 
immediately also run the release tasks for MW, ok?

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 26.04.2022 um 12:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Well it is a matter of a week, since we didn't release for upgrades since
> the beginning of the year and several were containing CVE fixes - but all
> upgradable without patching our code - I don't think we have to urge so we
> can likely wait for it and not chain releases which is always perceived as
> a negative sign (bad quality) even if it is not in practise.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 11:03, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
> 
>> I read it and it doesn't sound like that is something which is just around
>> the corner.
>> So I'd rather release mw now and let's do a follow up release in a few
>> weeks?
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 26.04.2022 um 10:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >> :
>>> 
>>> Can we await for David's fix on johnzon? Would love to get that out ASAP,
>>> should be max a week I think.
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 09:18, Mark Struberg 
>> a
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>> 
>>>> Any reason not to start a mw release today?
>>>> We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs.
>>>> 
>>>> Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it.
>>>> 
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Well it is a matter of a week, since we didn't release for upgrades since
the beginning of the year and several were containing CVE fixes - but all
upgradable without patching our code - I don't think we have to urge so we
can likely wait for it and not chain releases which is always perceived as
a negative sign (bad quality) even if it is not in practise.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 11:03, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> I read it and it doesn't sound like that is something which is just around
> the corner.
> So I'd rather release mw now and let's do a follow up release in a few
> weeks?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 26.04.2022 um 10:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Can we await for David's fix on johnzon? Would love to get that out ASAP,
> > should be max a week I think.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 09:18, Mark Struberg 
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> Hi folks!
> >>
> >> Any reason not to start a mw release today?
> >> We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs.
> >>
> >> Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it.
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

[Mark Struberg]

I read it and it doesn't sound like that is something which is just around the 
corner. 
So I'd rather release mw now and let's do a follow up release in a few weeks?

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 26.04.2022 um 10:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Can we await for David's fix on johnzon? Would love to get that out ASAP,
> should be max a week I think.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
> Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 09:18, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
> 
>> Hi folks!
>> 
>> Any reason not to start a mw release today?
>> We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs.
>> 
>> Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it.
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Can we await for David's fix on johnzon? Would love to get that out ASAP,
should be max a week I think.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 09:18, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> Hi folks!
>
> Any reason not to start a mw release today?
> We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs.
>
> Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

[DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

[Mark Struberg]

Hi folks!

Any reason not to start a mw release today?
We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs.

Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Which makes 4 +1 (enough bindings) so this vote passes, thank you all!

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le lun. 7 févr. 2022 à 23:49, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Le lun. 7 févr. 2022 à 22:06, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > > Am 06.02.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Old Blog
> > >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn  | Book
> > > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 3 févr. 2022 à 10:33, Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > > a écrit :
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Am Do., 3. Feb. 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is the changelog:
> > >>>
> > >>> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401
> > >>>  Make interceptor
> > >> injected
> > >>> method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes
> > >>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>> <
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > 
> > >>> RESOLVED
> > >>> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1402
> > >>>  CDI iterated
> > >>> Instance#select broken <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1402
> > >
> > >>> Romain
> > >>> Manni-Bucau
> > >>> <
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > 
> > >>> RESOLVED
> > >>>
> > >>> Tag (note: uses a http repo for the tck so ensure to build with
> maven <
> > >> 3.8
> > >>> or enable http mirrors with maven):
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=0f06ed15bfe3e53923971188e96ecc721242c2e0
> > >>> Staging:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1079/
> > >>> Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> > >>> My key is the same than last time.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1
> > >>> [ ] -1 ${cause}
> > >>>
> > >>> Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual or until we get enough
> binding
> > >>> votes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >>>  | Old Blog
> > >>>  | Github <
> > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >>> LinkedIn  | Book
> > >>> <
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO]

+1

Le lun. 7 févr. 2022 à 22:06, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 06.02.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
> >
> > Le jeu. 3 févr. 2022 à 10:33, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Am Do., 3. Feb. 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the changelog:
> >>>
> >>> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401
> >>>  Make interceptor
> >> injected
> >>> method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes
> >>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> <
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> 
> >>> RESOLVED
> >>> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1402
> >>>  CDI iterated
> >>> Instance#select broken  >
> >>> Romain
> >>> Manni-Bucau
> >>> <
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> 
> >>> RESOLVED
> >>>
> >>> Tag (note: uses a http repo for the tck so ensure to build with maven <
> >> 3.8
> >>> or enable http mirrors with maven):
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=0f06ed15bfe3e53923971188e96ecc721242c2e0
> >>> Staging:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1079/
> >>> Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> >>> My key is the same than last time.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1
> >>> [ ] -1 ${cause}
> >>>
> >>> Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual or until we get enough binding
> >>> votes.
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>>  | Old Blog
> >>>  | Github <
> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>> LinkedIn  | Book
> >>> <
> >>>
> >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> 
> >>>
> >>
>
>

-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

[Mark Struberg]

+1

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 06.02.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Book
> 
> 
> 
> Le jeu. 3 févr. 2022 à 10:33, Thomas Andraschko 
> a écrit :
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Am Do., 3. Feb. 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26.
>>> 
>>> Here is the changelog:
>>> 
>>> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401
>>>  Make interceptor
>> injected
>>> method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes
>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
 
>>> RESOLVED
>>> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1402
>>>  CDI iterated
>>> Instance#select broken 
>>> Romain
>>> Manni-Bucau
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
 
>>> RESOLVED
>>> 
>>> Tag (note: uses a http repo for the tck so ensure to build with maven <
>> 3.8
>>> or enable http mirrors with maven):
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=0f06ed15bfe3e53923971188e96ecc721242c2e0
>>> Staging:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1079/
>>> Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
>>> My key is the same than last time.
>>> 
>>> Please vote
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] -1 ${cause}
>>> 
>>> Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual or until we get enough binding
>>> votes.
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>>  | Old Blog
>>>  | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn  | Book
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le jeu. 3 févr. 2022 à 10:33, Thomas Andraschko 
a écrit :

> +1
>
> Am Do., 3. Feb. 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26.
> >
> > Here is the changelog:
> >
> > [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401
> >  Make interceptor
> injected
> > method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes
> >  Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > RESOLVED
> > [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1402
> >  CDI iterated
> > Instance#select broken 
> > Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > RESOLVED
> >
> > Tag (note: uses a http repo for the tck so ensure to build with maven <
> 3.8
> > or enable http mirrors with maven):
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=0f06ed15bfe3e53923971188e96ecc721242c2e0
> > Staging:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1079/
> > Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> > My key is the same than last time.
> >
> > Please vote
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1 ${cause}
> >
> > Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual or until we get enough binding
> > votes.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1

Am Do., 3. Feb. 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26.
>
> Here is the changelog:
>
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401
>  Make interceptor injected
> method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1402
>  CDI iterated
> Instance#select broken 
> Romain
> Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
>
> Tag (note: uses a http repo for the tck so ensure to build with maven < 3.8
> or enable http mirrors with maven):
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=0f06ed15bfe3e53923971188e96ecc721242c2e0
> Staging:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1079/
> Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> My key is the same than last time.
>
> Please vote
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1 ${cause}
>
> Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual or until we get enough binding
> votes.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi all,

Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26.

Here is the changelog:

[image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401
 Make interceptor injected
method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes
 Romain Manni-Bucau

RESOLVED
[image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1402
 CDI iterated
Instance#select broken  Romain
Manni-Bucau

RESOLVED

Tag (note: uses a http repo for the tck so ensure to build with maven < 3.8
or enable http mirrors with maven):
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=0f06ed15bfe3e53923971188e96ecc721242c2e0
Staging:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1079/
Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
My key is the same than last time.

Please vote

[ ] +1
[ ] -1 ${cause}

Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual or until we get enough binding
votes.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book

2.0.26 release bag

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi all,

I pushed a fix which sorts the intercepted methods in our interceptor
handlers enabling to use interceptors with pre-generated proxies.
I know Geronimo Arthur will want to integrate it for its 1.0.5 (it is
voting on 1.0.4 right now without interceptor support due to that).

Do we have anything pending to release or should we go?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Mark Struberg]

Hi!

The VOTE did pass with the following

+1: Romain, Jean-Louis, Reinhard, Arne, Mark

txs all!

gonna continue with the release steps.


LieGrue,
strub



> Am 14.12.2021 um 23:32 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Good evening!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.
> 
> The following tickets got resolved:
> Bug
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>] - 
> upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
> Task
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>] - 
> upgrade to java16 ready versions
> [MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>] - 
> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
> [MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>] - 
> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
> [MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>] - 
> Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
> [MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] - 
> [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers
> [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] - 
> upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
> [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>] - 
> Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25
> 
> Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the staging 
> repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.
> 
> 
> The staging repo can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/>
> 
> The source release is available at 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/>
> 
> sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26
> 
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Mark Struberg]

Time to tally the VOTE.

The VOTE did pass with the following

+1: Romain, Jean-Louis, Jon, Reinhard, Arne, Mark
No -1 nor 0

thank you all!

I'll gonna continue with the release steps.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 14.12.2021 um 23:24 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi lords and ladies!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
> 
> The following tickets have been resolved:
> Bug
> 
> [OWB-1393 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1393>] - OWB stops 
> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event 
> observer exists
> [OWB-1395 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1395>] - Jar not scanned 
> after 2.0.24 upgrade
> [OWB-1397 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1397>] - @Scope scopes 
> are NOT Bean defining annotations!
> [OWB-1398 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1398>] - Scanner doesnt 
> filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
> Task
> 
> [OWB-1396 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1396>] - upgrade to 
> log4j2 2.16.0
> 
> 
> The staging repo is 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077>
> 
> The source jar can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/>
> 
> sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
> 
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Mark Struberg]

+1

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 16.12.2021 um 20:15 schrieb Arne Limburg :
> 
> +1
> 
> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
> Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg
> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
> www.openknowledge.de<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=9vRVYZVZ%2Feqk%2BvFxU5COofNvgs8U0AxtxRqwVEwqXHA%3D=0>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
> Zu unseren 
> Events<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2Fevent%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=8tjmukdm1NxhXQMkn4VnESiBI216kXvh%2Fjb7%2FFYI0kE%3D=0>
> 
> Von: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04
> An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13
> +1
> 
> Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
> écrit :
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau><https://github.com/rmannibucau%3e> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:32, Mark Struberg  a
>> écrit :
>> 
>>> Good evening!
>>> 
>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.
>>> 
>>> The following tickets got resolved:
>>> Bug
>>> 
>>> [MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>]
>> -
>>> upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
>>> Task
>>> 
>>> [MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>]
>> -
>>> upgrade to java16 ready versions
>>> [MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>]
>> -
>>> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
>>> [MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>]
>> -
>>> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
>>> [MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>]
>> -
>>> Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
>>> [MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>]
>> -
>>> [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers
>>> [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>]
>> -
>>> upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
>>> [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>]
>> -
>>> Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25
>>> 
>>> Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the
>>> staging repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The staging repo can be found at:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The source release is available at
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please VOTE:
>>> 
>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>>> 
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Mark Struberg]

+1

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 16.12.2021 um 20:15 schrieb Arne Limburg :
> 
> +1 from me
> 
> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
> Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg
> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
> www.openknowledge.de<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=9vRVYZVZ%2Feqk%2BvFxU5COofNvgs8U0AxtxRqwVEwqXHA%3D=0>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
> Zu unseren 
> Events<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2Fevent%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=8tjmukdm1NxhXQMkn4VnESiBI216kXvh%2Fjb7%2FFYI0kE%3D=0>
> 
> Von: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04
> An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2
> +1
> 
> Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
> écrit :
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau><https://github.com/rmannibucau%3e> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:24, Mark Struberg  a
>> écrit :
>> 
>>> Hi lords and ladies!
>>> 
>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
>>> 
>>> The following tickets have been resolved:
>>> Bug
>>> 
>>> [OWB-1393 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1393>] - OWB stops
>>> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event
>>> observer exists
>>> [OWB-1395 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1395>] - Jar not
>>> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
>>> [OWB-1397 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1397>] - @Scope
>>> scopes are NOT Bean defining annotations!
>>> [OWB-1398 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1398>] - Scanner
>>> doesnt filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
>>> Task
>>> 
>>> [OWB-1396 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1396>] - upgrade to
>>> log4j2 2.16.0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The staging repo is
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The source jar can be found here:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please VOTE:
>>> 
>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>>> 
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jean-Louis

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Arne Limburg]

+1

OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg
Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
www.openknowledge.de<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=9vRVYZVZ%2Feqk%2BvFxU5COofNvgs8U0AxtxRqwVEwqXHA%3D=0>
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann

Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
Zu unseren 
Events<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2Fevent%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=8tjmukdm1NxhXQMkn4VnESiBI216kXvh%2Fjb7%2FFYI0kE%3D=0>

Von: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04
An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13
+1

Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau><https://github.com/rmannibucau%3e> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:32, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > Good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> > Bug
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>]
> -
> > upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
> > Task
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>]
> -
> > upgrade to java16 ready versions
> > [MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>]
> -
> > Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
> > [MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>]
> -
> > Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
> > [MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>]
> -
> > Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
> > [MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>]
> -
> > [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers
> > [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>]
> -
> > upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
> > [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>]
> -
> > Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25
> >
> > Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the
> > staging repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found at:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
> > >
> >
> > The source release is available at
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
> > >
> >
> > sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
>


--
Jean-Louis

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Arne Limburg]

+1 from me

OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg
Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942
Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154
Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111
arne.limb...@openknowledge.de<mailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
www.openknowledge.de<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=9vRVYZVZ%2Feqk%2BvFxU5COofNvgs8U0AxtxRqwVEwqXHA%3D=0>
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann

Treffen Sie uns auf kommenden Konferenzen und Workshops:
Zu unseren 
Events<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openknowledge.de%2Fevent%2F=04%7C01%7C%7C3004d8758be44c8678c008d93bcc1e23%7C48837bc476f9481d8a76bd7b60b43dec%7C0%7C0%7C637606570139932909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=8tjmukdm1NxhXQMkn4VnESiBI216kXvh%2Fjb7%2FFYI0kE%3D=0>

Von: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04
An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2
+1

Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau><https://github.com/rmannibucau%3e> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:24, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi lords and ladies!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
> >
> > The following tickets have been resolved:
> > Bug
> >
> > [OWB-1393 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1393>] - OWB stops
> > firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event
> > observer exists
> > [OWB-1395 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1395>] - Jar not
> > scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
> > [OWB-1397 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1397>] - @Scope
> > scopes are NOT Bean defining annotations!
> > [OWB-1398 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1398>] - Scanner
> > doesnt filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
> > Task
> >
> > [OWB-1396 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1396>] - upgrade to
> > log4j2 2.16.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> > >
> >
> > The source jar can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> > >
> >
> > sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
>


--
Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Reinhard Sandtner]

+1

lg
reini

> Am 14.12.2021 um 23:32 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Good evening!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.
> 
> The following tickets got resolved:
> Bug
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>] - 
> upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
> Task
> 
> [MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>] - 
> upgrade to java16 ready versions
> [MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>] - 
> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
> [MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>] - 
> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
> [MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>] - 
> Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
> [MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] - 
> [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers
> [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] - 
> upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
> [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>] - 
> Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25
> 
> Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the staging 
> repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.
> 
> 
> The staging repo can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/>
> 
> The source release is available at 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
>  
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/>
> 
> sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26
> 
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Reinhard Sandtner]

+1

lg
reini

> Am 14.12.2021 um 23:24 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> Hi lords and ladies!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
> 
> The following tickets have been resolved:
> Bug
> 
> [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops 
> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event 
> observer exists
> [OWB-1395 ] - Jar not scanned 
> after 2.0.24 upgrade
> [OWB-1397 ] - @Scope scopes 
> are NOT Bean defining annotations!
> [OWB-1398 ] - Scanner doesnt 
> filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
> Task
> 
> [OWB-1396 ] - upgrade to 
> log4j2 2.16.0
> 
> 
> The staging repo is 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077 
> 
> 
> The source jar can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>  
> 
> 
> sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
> 
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

+1

Jon

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:24 PM Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> Hi lords and ladies!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
>
> The following tickets have been resolved:
> Bug
>
> [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops
> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event
> observer exists
> [OWB-1395 ] - Jar not
> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
> [OWB-1397 ] - @Scope
> scopes are NOT Bean defining annotations!
> [OWB-1398 ] - Scanner
> doesnt filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
> Task
>
> [OWB-1396 ] - upgrade to
> log4j2 2.16.0
>
>
> The staging repo is
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> >
>
> The source jar can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> >
>
> sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
>
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO]

+1

Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:32, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > Good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved:
> > Bug
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>]
> -
> > upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
> > Task
> >
> > [MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>]
> -
> > upgrade to java16 ready versions
> > [MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>]
> -
> > Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
> > [MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>]
> -
> > Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
> > [MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>]
> -
> > Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
> > [MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>]
> -
> > [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers
> > [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>]
> -
> > upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
> > [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>]
> -
> > Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25
> >
> > Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the
> > staging repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found at:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
> > >
> >
> > The source release is available at
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
> > >
> >
> > sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
>


-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO]

+1

Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:24, Mark Struberg  a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi lords and ladies!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
> >
> > The following tickets have been resolved:
> > Bug
> >
> > [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops
> > firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event
> > observer exists
> > [OWB-1395 ] - Jar not
> > scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
> > [OWB-1397 ] - @Scope
> > scopes are NOT Bean defining annotations!
> > [OWB-1398 ] - Scanner
> > doesnt filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
> > Task
> >
> > [OWB-1396 ] - upgrade to
> > log4j2 2.16.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> > >
> >
> > The source jar can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> > >
> >
> > sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
>


-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:32, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.
>
> The following tickets got resolved:
> Bug
>
> [MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>] -
> upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
> Task
>
> [MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>] -
> upgrade to java16 ready versions
> [MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>] -
> Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
> [MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>] -
> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
> [MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>] -
> Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
> [MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] -
> [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers
> [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] -
> upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
> [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>] -
> Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25
>
> Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the
> staging repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.
>
>
> The staging repo can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/
> >
>
> The source release is available at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
> >
>
> sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26
>
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 23:24, Mark Struberg  a
écrit :

> Hi lords and ladies!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
>
> The following tickets have been resolved:
> Bug
>
> [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops
> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event
> observer exists
> [OWB-1395 ] - Jar not
> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
> [OWB-1397 ] - @Scope
> scopes are NOT Bean defining annotations!
> [OWB-1398 ] - Scanner
> doesnt filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
> Task
>
> [OWB-1396 ] - upgrade to
> log4j2 2.16.0
>
>
> The staging repo is
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077
> >
>
> The source jar can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> >
>
> sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d
>
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

[Mark Struberg]

Good evening!

I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13.

The following tickets got resolved:
Bug

[MEECROWAVE-304 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-304>] - 
upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0
Task

[MEECROWAVE-261 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-261>] - 
upgrade to java16 ready versions
[MEECROWAVE-300 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-300>] - 
Upgrade to johnzon 1.2.14
[MEECROWAVE-301 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-301>] - 
Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.54
[MEECROWAVE-302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-302>] - 
Upgrade to cxf 3.4.5
[MEECROWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] - [jpa] 
extension can leak closed entity managers
[MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] - 
upgrade various dependencies to latest versions
[MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>] - 
Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the staging 
repo as posted in the other VOTE thread.


The staging repo can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/ 
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/>

The source release is available at 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/
 
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1078/org/apache/meecrowave/meecrowave/1.2.13/>

sha1 is 4619a441a8bce34e55cc2d99281089667d9d7b26


Please VOTE:

[+1] let's ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

[Mark Struberg]

Hi lords and ladies!

I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.

The following tickets have been resolved:
Bug

[OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops firing 
ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event observer 
exists
[OWB-1395 ] - Jar not scanned 
after 2.0.24 upgrade
[OWB-1397 ] - @Scope scopes are 
NOT Bean defining annotations!
[OWB-1398 ] - Scanner doesnt 
filter JARs by exclusions in all cases
Task

[OWB-1396 ] - upgrade to log4j2 
2.16.0


The staging repo is 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077 


The source jar can be found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1077/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
 


sha1 is 3136dd1f8515487c6c8d88e77bdaca7c6066680d


Please VOTE:

[+1] let's ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

[Mark Struberg]

gonna do the OWB and MW release later tonight.

txs and LieGrue,
strub


> Am 13.12.2021 um 19:26 schrieb Thomas Andraschko 
> :
> 
> Yep, +1 from my side
> 
> Mark Struberg  schrieb am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021,
> 18:09:
> 
>> Hi Thomas!
>> 
>> Did the commit solve your issue at least well enough?
>> Can I run the release steps?
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>>> Am 13.12.2021 um 11:03 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> not fixed yet, will investigate
>>> 
>>> Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
>>> :
>>> 
>>>> done, can you try it out please?
>>>> 
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 13.12.2021 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> also PF integration tests are currently not working, please let me know
>>>> if
>>>>> i can try a newer snapshot after your fix
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 00:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
>>>>> :
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I found a glitch with implicit bean archives. gonna do a full retest
>> and
>>>>>> ship a new version tomorrow.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 12.12.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Mark Struberg
>> >>>>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi lords and ladies!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The following tickets have been resolved:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bug
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [OWB-1393 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1393>] - OWB
>>>> stops
>>>>>> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system
>>>> event
>>>>>> observer exists
>>>>>>> [OWB-1395 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1395>] - Jar
>> not
>>>>>> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
>>>>>>> Task
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [OWB-1396 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1396>] -
>> upgrade
>>>>>> to log4j2 2.15.0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The staging repo is
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
>>>>>> <
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The source jar can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> sha1 is 7262707440ba70d28ff777e5b1741885441f06f7
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please VOTE:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>>>>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>>>>>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

[Thomas Andraschko]

Yep, +1 from my side

Mark Struberg  schrieb am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021,
18:09:

> Hi Thomas!
>
> Did the commit solve your issue at least well enough?
> Can I run the release steps?
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 13.12.2021 um 11:03 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > not fixed yet, will investigate
> >
> > Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> > :
> >
> >> done, can you try it out please?
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 13.12.2021 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> also PF integration tests are currently not working, please let me know
> >> if
> >>> i can try a newer snapshot after your fix
> >>>
> >>> Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 00:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>>> I found a glitch with implicit bean archives. gonna do a full retest
> and
> >>>> ship a new version tomorrow.
> >>>>
> >>>> LieGrue,
> >>>> strub
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 12.12.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Mark Struberg
>  >>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi lords and ladies!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The following tickets have been resolved:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bug
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [OWB-1393 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1393>] - OWB
> >> stops
> >>>> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system
> >> event
> >>>> observer exists
> >>>>> [OWB-1395 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1395>] - Jar
> not
> >>>> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
> >>>>> Task
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [OWB-1396 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1396>] -
> upgrade
> >>>> to log4j2 2.15.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The staging repo is
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The source jar can be found here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sha1 is 7262707440ba70d28ff777e5b1741885441f06f7
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please VOTE:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [+1] let's ship it!
> >>>>> [+0] meh, don't care
> >>>>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>>>> strub
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

[Mark Struberg]

Hi Thomas!

Did the commit solve your issue at least well enough? 
Can I run the release steps?

txs and LieGrue,
strub

> Am 13.12.2021 um 11:03 schrieb Thomas Andraschko 
> :
> 
> not fixed yet, will investigate
> 
> Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
> 
>> done, can you try it out please?
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 13.12.2021 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> also PF integration tests are currently not working, please let me know
>> if
>>> i can try a newer snapshot after your fix
>>> 
>>> Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 00:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
>>> :
>>> 
>>>> I found a glitch with implicit bean archives. gonna do a full retest and
>>>> ship a new version tomorrow.
>>>> 
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 12.12.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Mark Struberg >>>> :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi lords and ladies!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The following tickets have been resolved:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bug
>>>>> 
>>>>> [OWB-1393 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1393>] - OWB
>> stops
>>>> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system
>> event
>>>> observer exists
>>>>> [OWB-1395 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1395>] - Jar not
>>>> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
>>>>> Task
>>>>> 
>>>>> [OWB-1396 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1396>] - upgrade
>>>> to log4j2 2.15.0
>>>>> 
>>>>> The staging repo is
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
>>>> <
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The source jar can be found here:
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>>> <
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>>>> 
>>>>> sha1 is 7262707440ba70d28ff777e5b1741885441f06f7
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please VOTE:
>>>>> 
>>>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>>>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>>>>> 
>>>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>>>> 
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

[Thomas Andraschko]

not fixed yet, will investigate

Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:

> done, can you try it out please?
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 13.12.2021 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > also PF integration tests are currently not working, please let me know
> if
> > i can try a newer snapshot after your fix
> >
> > Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 00:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> > :
> >
> >> I found a glitch with implicit bean archives. gonna do a full retest and
> >> ship a new version tomorrow.
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>> Am 12.12.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Mark Struberg  >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Hi lords and ladies!
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
> >>>
> >>> The following tickets have been resolved:
> >>>
> >>> Bug
> >>>
> >>> [OWB-1393 ] - OWB
> stops
> >> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system
> event
> >> observer exists
> >>> [OWB-1395 ] - Jar not
> >> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
> >>> Task
> >>>
> >>> [OWB-1396 ] - upgrade
> >> to log4j2 2.15.0
> >>>
> >>> The staging repo is
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
> >> <
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The source jar can be found here:
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> >> <
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
> >>>
> >>> sha1 is 7262707440ba70d28ff777e5b1741885441f06f7
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please VOTE:
> >>>
> >>> [+1] let's ship it!
> >>> [+0] meh, don't care
> >>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
> >>>
> >>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >>>
> >>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

[Mark Struberg]

done, can you try it out please?

txs and LieGrue,
strub


> Am 13.12.2021 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Andraschko 
> :
> 
> also PF integration tests are currently not working, please let me know if
> i can try a newer snapshot after your fix
> 
> Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 00:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
> 
>> I found a glitch with implicit bean archives. gonna do a full retest and
>> ship a new version tomorrow.
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>>> Am 12.12.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Mark Struberg >> :
>>> 
>>> Hi lords and ladies!
>>> 
>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25.
>>> 
>>> The following tickets have been resolved:
>>> 
>>> Bug
>>> 
>>> [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops
>> firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event
>> observer exists
>>> [OWB-1395 ] - Jar not
>> scanned after 2.0.24 upgrade
>>> Task
>>> 
>>> [OWB-1396 ] - upgrade
>> to log4j2 2.15.0
>>> 
>>> The staging repo is
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The source jar can be found here:
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1075/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.25/
>>> 
>>> sha1 is 7262707440ba70d28ff777e5b1741885441f06f7
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please VOTE:
>>> 
>>> [+1] let's ship it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>> [-1] gnah, there is a ${showstopper}
>>> 
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>> 
>>