Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

[Dominic Kim]

+1 to release rc2 of openwhisk-client-js v3.21.0

imac27:tmp style95$ ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js'
3.21.0 rc2
rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F  9783 03D8 A395 2AA9
01A0)
working in the following directory:
/var/folders/jc/wfhtkrln4q7cz9pxz24rbkdmgp/T/tmp.JwQC7dZf
fetching tarball and signatures from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2
fetching openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
fetching openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc
fetching openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512
fetching release keys
importing keys
gpg: key 72AF0CC22C4CF320: "Vincent Hou (Release manager of OpenWhisk) <
houshen...@apache.org>" not changed
gpg: key 22907064147F886E: "Dave Grove " not changed
gpg: key 44667BC927C86D51: "Rodric Rabbah " not changed
gpg: key B1457C3D7101CC78: "James Thomas " not
changed
gpg: key A600E3331427515D: "Olivier Tardieu " not
changed
gpg: Total number processed: 5
gpg:  unchanged: 5
unpacking tar ball
cloning scancode
'openwhisk-utilities'에 복제합니다...
remote: Enumerating objects: 55, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (55/55), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (41/41), done.
remote: Total 55 (delta 21), reused 30 (delta 11), pack-reused 0
오브젝트 묶음 푸는 중: 100% (55/55), 완료.
computing sha512 for openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
SHA512: openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz:
1113887D 606FFF7B EB727DB3 46EE0B95 8614F1E0 3AD34E6A 6C234A1F 8D64802E
1F605A21
 23D82983 E8254104 B936AE9F B7065345 17B38D23 7A152812 C7DEE899
validating sha512... passed
verifying asc... passed (signed-by: Rodric Rabbah )
verifying notice... passed
verifying absence of DISCLAIMER.txt passed
verifying license... passed
verifying sources have proper headers... passed
scanning for executable files... passed
scanning for unexpected file types... passed
scanning for archives... passed
scanning for packages... passed

Dominic



2020년 2월 4일 (화) 오전 5:00, Rob Allen 님이 작성:

> Hi,
>
> +1 to release version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2 of OpenWhisk Client Js
>
> Checked with rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F  9783 03D8
> A395 2AA9 01A0)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob
>
>
> > On 3 Feb 2020, at 16:18, Rodric Rabbah  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2
> of
> > the following project module with artifacts built from the Git
> repositories
> > and commit IDs listed below.
> >
> > * OpenWhisk Client Js: 7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/commits/7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512
> >
> > This release is comprised of source code distribution only.
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > checklist below:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8
> > '
> >
> > Usage:
> > curl -s "
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8
> '"
> > -o rcverify.sh
> > chmod +x rcverify.sh
> > rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >  [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >  [ ]  0 Don't care
> >  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > Release verification checklist for reference:
> >  [ ] Download links are valid.
> >  [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> >  [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> >  [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
> >  [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> > policy [1].
> >  [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >
> > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
>
> --
> Development thoughts at http://akrabat.com
> Daily Jotter for macOS at http://dailyjotter.com
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

[Rob Allen]

Hi,

+1 to release version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2 of OpenWhisk Client Js

Checked with rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F  9783 03D8 A395 
2AA9 01A0)

Regards,

Rob


> On 3 Feb 2020, at 16:18, Rodric Rabbah  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2 of
> the following project module with artifacts built from the Git repositories
> and commit IDs listed below.
> 
> * OpenWhisk Client Js: 7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/commits/7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512
> 
> This release is comprised of source code distribution only.
> 
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> checklist below:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8
> '
> 
> Usage:
> curl -s "
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8'"
> -o rcverify.sh
> chmod +x rcverify.sh
> rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
>  [ ] +1 Approve the release
>  [ ]  0 Don't care
>  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> 
> Release verification checklist for reference:
>  [ ] Download links are valid.
>  [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>  [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>  [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
>  [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> policy [1].
>  [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> 
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> 
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md

-- 
Development thoughts at http://akrabat.com
Daily Jotter for macOS at http://dailyjotter.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

[David P Grove]

+1 to release rc2 of openwhisk-client-js v3.21.0.

manually inspected and checked with rcverify (log appended).

--dave

Daves-MacBook-Pro:tools dgrove$ ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js
'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2
rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F  9783 03D8 A395 2AA9
01A0)
working in the following directory:
/var/folders/8c/zvj0nsxx2rgc_km8nvf8k0c0gn/T/tmp.iqdvUcHw
fetching tarball and signatures from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2
fetching openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
fetching openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc
fetching openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512
fetching release keys
importing keys
gpg: key 72AF0CC22C4CF320: "Vincent Hou (Release manager of OpenWhisk)
" not changed
gpg: key 22907064147F886E: "Dave Grove " not changed
gpg: key 44667BC927C86D51: "Rodric Rabbah " not changed
gpg: key B1457C3D7101CC78: "James Thomas " not
changed
gpg: key A600E3331427515D: "Olivier Tardieu " not
changed
gpg: Total number processed: 5
gpg:  unchanged: 5
unpacking tar ball
cloning scancode
Cloning into 'openwhisk-utilities'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 55, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (55/55), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (41/41), done.
remote: Total 55 (delta 21), reused 30 (delta 11), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (55/55), done.
computing sha512 for openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
SHA512: openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz:
1113887D 606FFF7B EB727DB3 46EE0B95 8614F1E0 3AD34E6A 6C234A1F 8D64802E
1F605A21
 23D82983 E8254104 B936AE9F B7065345 17B38D23 7A152812 C7DEE899
validating sha512... passed
verifying asc... passed (signed-by: Rodric Rabbah )
verifying notice... passed
verifying absence of DISCLAIMER.txt passed
verifying license... passed
verifying sources have proper headers... passed
scanning for executable files... passed
scanning for unexpected file types... passed
scanning for archives... passed
scanning for packages... passed

On 2020/02/03 16:18:46, Rodric Rabbah  wrote:
> Hi,>
>
> This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2
of>
> the following project module with artifacts built from the Git
repositories>
> and commit IDs listed below.>
>
> * OpenWhisk Client Js: 7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc>
>
>
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/commits/7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc>

>
>
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz>

>
>
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc>

>
>
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512>

>
> This release is comprised of source code distribution only.>
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the>
> checklist below:>
>
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8>

> '>
>
> Usage:>
> curl -s ">
>
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8'">

> -o rcverify.sh>
> chmod +x rcverify.sh>
> rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:>
>
>   [ ] +1 Approve the release>
>   [ ]  0 Don't care>
>   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...>
>
> Release verification checklist for reference:>
>   [ ] Download links are valid.>
>   [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.>
>   [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
release.>
>   [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk
repository.>
>   [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project>
> policy [1].>
>   [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.>
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.>
>
>
> [1]>
>
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md>

>

[CANCELED rc1 VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc1)

[Rodric Rabbah]

Hello, this vote on rc1 is cancelled because I signed the rc1 candidate with my 
personal id instead of my Apache id. A new rc2 with updated instructions was 
just sent out.

(Thanks Dave for catching it.)

-r

On 2020/02/02 20:49:57, "David P Grove"  wrote: 
> I'm having problems verifying the detached signature.  Rodric, did you
> perhaps use a new key by mistake that needs to be uploaded to the openwhisk
> KEYS file?
> 
> Daves-MacBook-Pro:rc1 dgrove$ gpg --verify
> openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc
> openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Sat Feb  1 10:27:13 2020 EST
> gpg:using RSA key 066DF39E0294C7FF90953B76A6E46CAF938D5BAF
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> 
> --dave
> 

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

[Rodric Rabbah]

Hi,

This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2 of
the following project module with artifacts built from the Git repositories
and commit IDs listed below.

* OpenWhisk Client Js: 7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc

https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/commits/7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.asc

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc2/openwhisk-client-js-3.21.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512

This release is comprised of source code distribution only.

You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
checklist below:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8
'

Usage:
curl -s "
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=b'b63c7e8'"
-o rcverify.sh
chmod +x rcverify.sh
rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2

Please vote to approve this release:

  [ ] +1 Approve the release
  [ ]  0 Don't care
  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

Release verification checklist for reference:
  [ ] Download links are valid.
  [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
  [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
  [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
  [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
policy [1].
  [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.

This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.


[1]
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md

Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request

[Michele Sciabarra]

This is basically also what I am trying to do. 

I guess the difference is that you are doing this using the standard nodejs 
runtime while I am doing the same using the goproxy. I am sure it is also 
similar to the adobe/wskdebug that I tried to use, and works but it specific to 
the node and java runtimes, without actionloop. 

My goal is to get the debugger for the "other" languages, most notabily 
typescript python and go.

Let's discuss on the call to see how we can align efforts.


-- 
  Michele Sciabarra
  mich...@sciabarra.com

- Original message -
From: Dominic Kim 
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Subject: Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request
Date: Monday, February 03, 2020 10:52 AM

Thank you for the details.
It seems what you are tying now is similar with our approach and can be
aligned with ours too as it is generic like you said.

We enabled the debugging of Nodejs runtime with chrome DevTools protocol
https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/.
Our UI communicates with the real remote OW deployment.
We implemented one proxy server to correlate a debugging session with a
corresponding action container.
Since each action container is not exposed to public, we also have a bridge
component on each invoker machine for location transparency.

If I understood correctly, each container will connect to the IDE in a
reverse way in your version and similarly it connects to the proxy via
bridge in our version.
SoI think two versions can coexist, if we make the interface extensible.

Maybe I can share more details at this interchange call.


Thanks
Best regards
Dominic.




2020년 2월 3일 (월) 오후 4:47, Michele Sciabarra 님이 작성:

> Hi Dominic
>
> the preliminary work I did was already submitted as a PR to build a
> standalone docker image (that is critical for my design).
>
> The rest the work is here:  https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-ide
> and uses the (upcoming) typescript runtime here
> https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-runtime-typescript. But do not
> use it yet as it is pretty much work in progress, no documentation nor it
> is even remotely stable.
>
> The key idea is to leverage the fact that actionloop launches a process
> for each action, and I am simplying putting the process in debug mode. Then
> I am using Eclipse Theia, that is vscode in a browser,
> https://theia-ide.org/ as an editor and  debugger interface.
>
> The key problem I have is to connect the action running under a debugger
> (problem solved) with the debugger client. So far I am just starting the
> action , asking to the action its IP and then connecting to it with the
> debugger. Problem is that the action may have a different IP
>
> I am now in the process of trying a different approach, where I
> communicate to the action the IP of the IDE and ask to the action to
> connect back, maybe creating a tunnel. In this way it could work in a more
> generic way, even with a production whisk, as the only requirement will be
> to have the client (that is itself a docker container) reachable by the
> action.
>
> --
>   Michele Sciabarra
>   mich...@sciabarra.com
>
> - Original message -
> From: Dominic Kim 
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request
> Date: Monday, February 03, 2020 7:07 AM
>
> Hi Michele.
> Thank you for sharing great works.
>
> We here(Naver) are also using a web based debugging feature and I would
> like to align ours with yours.
> Is there any reference that I can follow up your works?
> Did you open any PR?
>
> And I want to share our version at this tech interchange call.
>
>
> Best regards
> Dominic
>
>
> 2020년 2월 2일 (일) 오전 7:02, Michele Sciabarra 님이 작성:
>
> > Great suggestion. I know how to pass configuration parameters, what is
> the
> > configuration to set?
> >
> > --
> >   Michele Sciabarra
> >   mich...@sciabarra.com
> >
> > - Original message -
> > From: Rodric Rabbah 
> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request
> > Date: Saturday, February 01, 2020 8:35 PM
> >
> > > The first problem is that I need to invoke an action twice as the first
> > time the debugger does not attach. I guess it is because the image is
> > paused.
> >
> > Did you try to change the pause grace configuration to an max int.
> >
> > -r
> >
>

[slack-digest] [2020-02-02] #kubernetes

[OpenWhisk Team Slack]

2020-02-02 08:20:55 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Hi all, I have recently started to 
explore scheduling for serverless functions. If I deploy OpenWhisk using 
Kubernetes, what mechanisms does the Invoker use to run actions?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C4J3R7JFL/p1580631655017300?thread_ts=1580631655.017300=C4J3R7JFL

2020-02-02 20:51:33 UTC - Dave Grove: 

https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C4J3R7JFL/p1580676693017400?thread_ts=1580631655.017300=C4J3R7JFL

2020-02-02 20:52:41 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Thank you!
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C4J3R7JFL/p1580676761017600?thread_ts=1580631655.017300=C4J3R7JFL

[slack-digest] [2020-02-02] #performance

[OpenWhisk Team Slack]

2020-02-02 21:39:12 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Hello there, I was wondering if there 
are tests that measure the performance of different OpenWhisk components. For 
example, how many Action invocations can the Controller schedule every second 
or what is the Invoker’s latency/overhead?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C9HCXAKJ4/p1580679552002200

Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request

[Dominic Kim]

Thank you for the details.
It seems what you are tying now is similar with our approach and can be
aligned with ours too as it is generic like you said.

We enabled the debugging of Nodejs runtime with chrome DevTools protocol
https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/.
Our UI communicates with the real remote OW deployment.
We implemented one proxy server to correlate a debugging session with a
corresponding action container.
Since each action container is not exposed to public, we also have a bridge
component on each invoker machine for location transparency.

If I understood correctly, each container will connect to the IDE in a
reverse way in your version and similarly it connects to the proxy via
bridge in our version.
SoI think two versions can coexist, if we make the interface extensible.

Maybe I can share more details at this interchange call.


Thanks
Best regards
Dominic.




2020년 2월 3일 (월) 오후 4:47, Michele Sciabarra 님이 작성:

> Hi Dominic
>
> the preliminary work I did was already submitted as a PR to build a
> standalone docker image (that is critical for my design).
>
> The rest the work is here:  https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-ide
> and uses the (upcoming) typescript runtime here
> https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-runtime-typescript. But do not
> use it yet as it is pretty much work in progress, no documentation nor it
> is even remotely stable.
>
> The key idea is to leverage the fact that actionloop launches a process
> for each action, and I am simplying putting the process in debug mode. Then
> I am using Eclipse Theia, that is vscode in a browser,
> https://theia-ide.org/ as an editor and  debugger interface.
>
> The key problem I have is to connect the action running under a debugger
> (problem solved) with the debugger client. So far I am just starting the
> action , asking to the action its IP and then connecting to it with the
> debugger. Problem is that the action may have a different IP
>
> I am now in the process of trying a different approach, where I
> communicate to the action the IP of the IDE and ask to the action to
> connect back, maybe creating a tunnel. In this way it could work in a more
> generic way, even with a production whisk, as the only requirement will be
> to have the client (that is itself a docker container) reachable by the
> action.
>
> --
>   Michele Sciabarra
>   mich...@sciabarra.com
>
> - Original message -
> From: Dominic Kim 
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request
> Date: Monday, February 03, 2020 7:07 AM
>
> Hi Michele.
> Thank you for sharing great works.
>
> We here(Naver) are also using a web based debugging feature and I would
> like to align ours with yours.
> Is there any reference that I can follow up your works?
> Did you open any PR?
>
> And I want to share our version at this tech interchange call.
>
>
> Best regards
> Dominic
>
>
> 2020년 2월 2일 (일) 오전 7:02, Michele Sciabarra 님이 작성:
>
> > Great suggestion. I know how to pass configuration parameters, what is
> the
> > configuration to set?
> >
> > --
> >   Michele Sciabarra
> >   mich...@sciabarra.com
> >
> > - Original message -
> > From: Rodric Rabbah 
> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request
> > Date: Saturday, February 01, 2020 8:35 PM
> >
> > > The first problem is that I need to invoke an action twice as the first
> > time the debugger does not attach. I guess it is because the image is
> > paused.
> >
> > Did you try to change the pause grace configuration to an max int.
> >
> > -r
> >
>