Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-18 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi,

 Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de hat am 11. Juni 2014 um 08:04
 geschrieben:


 Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
  Hi,
 
  there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
  to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
  bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
  from now?
 
  WDYT?
 How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?
Just as a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release either
this evening (approx. in 7 hours from now) or tomorrow
depending on my free cycles

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-18 Thread Tilman Hausherr
If possible, please tell again maybe 30min in advance, I'm starting to 
remove unused imports.

Tilman

Am 18.06.2014 11:54, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,


Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de hat am 11. Juni 2014 um 08:04
geschrieben:


Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?

Just as a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release either
this evening (approx. in 7 hours from now) or tomorrow
depending on my free cycles

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler




Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-18 Thread Tilman Hausherr

Oops, ignore this, I'll work on 2.0 only.
Tilman

Am 18.06.2014 16:31, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
If possible, please tell again maybe 30min in advance, I'm starting to 
remove unused imports.
Tilman 




Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-12 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler

Hi,

Am 12.06.2014 07:58, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:

Hi,

would you think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1512 
(TextPositionComparator is not compatible with Java 7) should potentially be 
handled. Although I haven’t received feedback on it I could move forward 
implementing it to reflect other PDF readers handle positions. But I wouldn’t 
be able to start working on it before the week after next.
That is one of more important ones. I myself tried to solve it several times but 
without success. I guess we have to implement our own sorting algorythm as 
already proposed by several people.
To answer your question, I don't want to wait for a solution, as it is more or 
less easy to just cut a new 1.8.x release.



BR

Maruan



BR
Andreas Lehmkühler



Am 11.06.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de:


Sure... Could you make a decision on
PDFBOX-239 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-239? And are there 
any other issues that are to be fixed for 1.8.6?

Tilman





Am 11.06.2014 08:04, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler










Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-11 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler



Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-11 Thread Tilman Hausherr

Sure... Could you make a decision on
PDFBOX-239 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-239? And are 
there any other issues that are to be fixed for 1.8.6?


Tilman





Am 11.06.2014 08:04, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler





Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-11 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler

Hi,

Am 11.06.2014 18:02, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:

Sure... Could you make a decision on
PDFBOX-239 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-239?
I hope you isn't me. Decisions are not limited to me, it's a community 
thing. If you are ok with it and no one objects, go ahead (see my recently added 
comment).



And are there any other issues that are to be fixed for 1.8.6?

I'm planning to work on PDFBOX-1596 but I've any other issue on my list.

Anyone/anything else?


Tilman



BR
Andreas Lehmkühler






Am 11.06.2014 08:04, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


BR
Andreas Lehmkühler








Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-06-11 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
Hi,

would you think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1512 
(TextPositionComparator is not compatible with Java 7) should potentially be 
handled. Although I haven’t received feedback on it I could move forward 
implementing it to reflect other PDF readers handle positions. But I wouldn’t 
be able to start working on it before the week after next.

BR

Maruan

Am 11.06.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de:

 Sure... Could you make a decision on
 PDFBOX-239 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-239? And are there 
 any other issues that are to be fixed for 1.8.6?
 
 Tilman
 
 
 
 
 
 Am 11.06.2014 08:04, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
 Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
 Hi,
 
 there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
 to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
 bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
 from now?
 
 WDYT?
 How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th?
 
 BR
 Andreas Lehmkühler
 
 BR
 Andreas Lehmkühler
 
 



Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-29 Thread James Green
Any chances of getting PDFBOX-1596 in? It has had a patch since February
and we're having to locally patch the sources for our own purposes.

I'm unsure what else I need to do to it get attention.


On 28 May 2014 20:25, Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de wrote:

 +1 and thanks. But you were also very active, the last weekend was our
 most productive ever, I think.

 Although I'm not a statistics guy, I like that the 300 day report
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.
 jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310760periodName=dailydaysprevious=300
 cumulative=trueversionLabels=majorselectedProjectId=
 12310760reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
 reports%3Acreatedvsresolved-reportNext=Next
 is almost fully green.

 Tilman

 Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

  Hi,

 there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
 to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
 bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
 from now?

 WDYT?

 BR
 Andreas Lehmkühler





Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-29 Thread Tilman Hausherr
I didn't do it because I've never used overlays. And I haven't fully 
understood what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side. 
And I suspect that you're asking not for one, but two or three features. 
(moving into class; PDDocument; cloning)


I might help with some basic stuff, i.e. refactoring to move stuff into 
another class.


What I'm also wondering about: your patch has 
pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/util/Overlay.java with only + 
although the file already exists. Maybe rewrite that patch, or write 
steps (in the JIRA, not here) what you'd like, i.e. which class should 
be moved into which existent or new class.


And attaching a yet untested patch is not really good motivation :-(

Tilman




Am 29.05.2014 10:44, schrieb James Green:

Any chances of getting PDFBOX-1596 in? It has had a patch since February
and we're having to locally patch the sources for our own purposes.

I'm unsure what else I need to do to it get attention.


On 28 May 2014 20:25, Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de wrote:


+1 and thanks. But you were also very active, the last weekend was our
most productive ever, I think.

Although I'm not a statistics guy, I like that the 300 day report
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.
jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310760periodName=dailydaysprevious=300
cumulative=trueversionLabels=majorselectedProjectId=
12310760reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
reports%3Acreatedvsresolved-reportNext=Next
is almost fully green.

Tilman

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

  Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler







Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-29 Thread Tilman Hausherr
I made some slight changes in your text. Do the changes reflect what you 
meant? (Sorry, I usually don't do that often)

Tilman

Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
And I haven't fully understood what you want, maybe this is a language 
problem on my side.




Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-29 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler

Hi,

Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:

I didn't do it because I've never used overlays. And I haven't fully understood
what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side. And I suspect that
you're asking not for one, but two or three features. (moving into class;
PDDocument; cloning)

I might help with some basic stuff, i.e. refactoring to move stuff into another
class.

What I'm also wondering about: your patch has
pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/util/Overlay.java with only +
although the file already exists. Maybe rewrite that patch, or write steps (in
the JIRA, not here) what you'd like, i.e. which class should be moved into which
existent or new class.
As far as I can remember the idea is to move most of the code from the 
commandline tool class to an util class so that those stuff could be used 
anywhere without using the commandline tool itself. Which leads to more or less 
copying the whole OverlayPDF class to a new one.

I guess there was a discussion on the user@ or dev@ some time ago ...

I'm going to put this one on my TODO list if noone else jumps in.


And attaching a yet untested patch is not really good motivation :-(

+1


Tilman




Am 29.05.2014 10:44, schrieb James Green:

Any chances of getting PDFBOX-1596 in? It has had a patch since February
and we're having to locally patch the sources for our own purposes.

I'm unsure what else I need to do to it get attention.


On 28 May 2014 20:25, Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de wrote:


+1 and thanks. But you were also very active, the last weekend was our
most productive ever, I think.

Although I'm not a statistics guy, I like that the 300 day report
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.
jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310760periodName=dailydaysprevious=300
cumulative=trueversionLabels=majorselectedProjectId=
12310760reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
reports%3Acreatedvsresolved-reportNext=Next
is almost fully green.

Tilman

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

  Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler









Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-29 Thread James Green
On 29 May 2014 12:37, Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de wrote:

 Hi,


 Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:

 I didn't do it because I've never used overlays. And I haven't fully
 understood

 what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side. And I suspect
 that
 you're asking not for one, but two or three features. (moving into class;
 PDDocument; cloning)

 I might help with some basic stuff, i.e. refactoring to move stuff into
 another
 class.

 What I'm also wondering about: your patch has
 pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/util/Overlay.java with only +
 although the file already exists. Maybe rewrite that patch, or write
 steps (in
 the JIRA, not here) what you'd like, i.e. which class should be moved
 into which
 existent or new class.

 As far as I can remember the idea is to move most of the code from the
 commandline tool class to an util class so that those stuff could be used
 anywhere without using the commandline tool itself. Which leads to more or
 less copying the whole OverlayPDF class to a new one.
 I guess there was a discussion on the user@ or dev@ some time ago ...


Yeah our application takes multiple PDFs and creates a final rendered
file. It needs to append pages, and overlay pages to replicate stationary
effects. All within Java code - it cannot do this using the command line
for security reasons.


 I'm going to put this one on my TODO list if noone else jumps in.


Many thanks.




  And attaching a yet untested patch is not really good motivation :-(

 +1


Fully aware of this - if I can come up with tests I will but was working
within a commercial deadline at the time.


PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-28 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

2014-05-28 Thread Tilman Hausherr
+1 and thanks. But you were also very active, the last weekend was our 
most productive ever, I think.


Although I'm not a statistics guy, I like that the 300 day report
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310760periodName=dailydaysprevious=300cumulative=trueversionLabels=majorselectedProjectId=12310760reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.reports%3Acreatedvsresolved-reportNext=Next
is almost fully green.

Tilman

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:

Hi,

there are already a number of solved issues mostly due
to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new
bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks
from now?

WDYT?

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler