[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13023253#comment-13023253
]
Richard Ding commented on PIG-2005:
---
Patch-test result:
{code}
[exec] +1 overall.
[exec]
[exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
[exec]
[exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or
modified tests.
[exec]
[exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning
messages.
[exec]
[exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number
of javac compiler warnings.
[exec]
[exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs
warnings.
[exec]
[exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of release audit warnings.
{code}
Unit tests pass.
> Discrepancy in the way dry run handles semicolon in macro definition
>
>
> Key: PIG-2005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2005
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: grunt
>Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>Reporter: Richard Ding
>Assignee: Richard Ding
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
> Attachments: PIG-2005_1.patch
>
>
> Macro definition requires a semicolon to mark the end. For example:
> {code}
> define mymacro(x) returns y {... ...};
> {code}
> But invoked through command line, the macro definitions without semicolon
> also work except in the case of dryrun. This discrepancy is due to
> GruntParser automatic appending a semicolon to Pig statements if semicolon is
> absent at the end. Dryrun GruntParser should do the same.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
