Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-22 Thread Yubiao Feng 
+1 (non-binding)

> Who can help me by updating the wiki with pass vote to this?

I did it

Thanks
Yubiao Feng

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 9:23 PM Asaf Mesika  wrote:

> Who can help me by updating the wiki with pass vote to this?
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:20 PM Asaf Mesika  wrote:
>
> > Thank you all for your votes.
> >
> > Summary
> > Binding votes: Peghui, Hang, Enrico, Mattisson,
> > Non binding: Max, Zike
> > Binding no vote (0): Dave Fisher
> >
> > Passed with 4 binding +1 and 2 non-binding +1 and 1 binding 0.
> >
> > I'll publish a separate email to start with the new process once I finish
> > with the PRs
> >
> > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:27 PM Enrico Olivelli 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >> Il giorno dom 21 mag 2023 alle ore 18:05 Asaf Mesika
> >>  ha scritto:
> >> >
> >> > We're not dropping. We're allowing both.
> >> > Quoting from PIP below.
> >> > Are you ok with this, Enrico?
> >> > Again - we're trying this out, and we'll iterate after we feel this
> for
> >> a
> >> > while.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >1.
> >> >
> >> >People discuss using PR comments, each is its own-threaded comment.
> >> >General comments can be made both as replies in the mailing list or
> >> as
> >> >general comment in the PR. After 10 PIPs in this way we’ll be able
> >> to see
> >> >what people gravitate towards and what’s more convenient and
> consider
> >> >refining that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Enrico Olivelli 
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Dave,
> >> > > I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing
> list.
> >> > > In that case I would cast a -1.
> >> > >
> >> > > Enrico
> >> > >
> >> > > Il giorno mar 16 mag 2023 alle ore 06:27 Dave Fisher
> >> > >  ha scritto:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -0 (binding) having discussions on the mailing list makes it much
> >> easier
> >> > > to understand decisions years in the future. Just yesterday I
> reviewed
> >> > > email threads in another project from 16 years ago.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best,
> >> > > > Dave
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On May 10, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Asaf Mesika  >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Asaf
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-22 Thread Asaf Mesika 
Who can help me by updating the wiki with pass vote to this?

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:20 PM Asaf Mesika  wrote:

> Thank you all for your votes.
>
> Summary
> Binding votes: Peghui, Hang, Enrico, Mattisson,
> Non binding: Max, Zike
> Binding no vote (0): Dave Fisher
>
> Passed with 4 binding +1 and 2 non-binding +1 and 1 binding 0.
>
> I'll publish a separate email to start with the new process once I finish
> with the PRs
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:27 PM Enrico Olivelli 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>> Il giorno dom 21 mag 2023 alle ore 18:05 Asaf Mesika
>>  ha scritto:
>> >
>> > We're not dropping. We're allowing both.
>> > Quoting from PIP below.
>> > Are you ok with this, Enrico?
>> > Again - we're trying this out, and we'll iterate after we feel this for
>> a
>> > while.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >1.
>> >
>> >People discuss using PR comments, each is its own-threaded comment.
>> >General comments can be made both as replies in the mailing list or
>> as
>> >general comment in the PR. After 10 PIPs in this way we’ll be able
>> to see
>> >what people gravitate towards and what’s more convenient and consider
>> >refining that.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Enrico Olivelli 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dave,
>> > > I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing list.
>> > > In that case I would cast a -1.
>> > >
>> > > Enrico
>> > >
>> > > Il giorno mar 16 mag 2023 alle ore 06:27 Dave Fisher
>> > >  ha scritto:
>> > > >
>> > > > -0 (binding) having discussions on the mailing list makes it much
>> easier
>> > > to understand decisions years in the future. Just yesterday I reviewed
>> > > email threads in another project from 16 years ago.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Dave
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > > On May 10, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Asaf Mesika 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Asaf
>> > > >
>> > >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-22 Thread Asaf Mesika 
Thank you all for your votes.

Summary
Binding votes: Peghui, Hang, Enrico, Mattisson,
Non binding: Max, Zike
Binding no vote (0): Dave Fisher

Passed with 4 binding +1 and 2 non-binding +1 and 1 binding 0.

I'll publish a separate email to start with the new process once I finish
with the PRs

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:27 PM Enrico Olivelli  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno dom 21 mag 2023 alle ore 18:05 Asaf Mesika
>  ha scritto:
> >
> > We're not dropping. We're allowing both.
> > Quoting from PIP below.
> > Are you ok with this, Enrico?
> > Again - we're trying this out, and we'll iterate after we feel this for a
> > while.
> >
> >
> >
> >1.
> >
> >People discuss using PR comments, each is its own-threaded comment.
> >General comments can be made both as replies in the mailing list or as
> >general comment in the PR. After 10 PIPs in this way we’ll be able to
> see
> >what people gravitate towards and what’s more convenient and consider
> >refining that.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Enrico Olivelli 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dave,
> > > I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing list.
> > > In that case I would cast a -1.
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > Il giorno mar 16 mag 2023 alle ore 06:27 Dave Fisher
> > >  ha scritto:
> > > >
> > > > -0 (binding) having discussions on the mailing list makes it much
> easier
> > > to understand decisions years in the future. Just yesterday I reviewed
> > > email threads in another project from 16 years ago.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > > On May 10, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Asaf Mesika 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Asaf
> > > >
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli 
+1 (binding)

Enrico

Il giorno dom 21 mag 2023 alle ore 18:05 Asaf Mesika
 ha scritto:
>
> We're not dropping. We're allowing both.
> Quoting from PIP below.
> Are you ok with this, Enrico?
> Again - we're trying this out, and we'll iterate after we feel this for a
> while.
>
>
>
>1.
>
>People discuss using PR comments, each is its own-threaded comment.
>General comments can be made both as replies in the mailing list or as
>general comment in the PR. After 10 PIPs in this way we’ll be able to see
>what people gravitate towards and what’s more convenient and consider
>refining that.
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Enrico Olivelli  wrote:
>
> > Dave,
> > I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing list.
> > In that case I would cast a -1.
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno mar 16 mag 2023 alle ore 06:27 Dave Fisher
> >  ha scritto:
> > >
> > > -0 (binding) having discussions on the mailing list makes it much easier
> > to understand decisions years in the future. Just yesterday I reviewed
> > email threads in another project from 16 years ago.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On May 10, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Asaf Mesika 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Asaf
> > >
> >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression.

2023-05-22 Thread Asaf Mesika 
Hi,

I have a couple of questions:

current we support to set compression on ManagedLedger and ManagedCursor
> metadata
> by managedLedgerInfoCompressionType and managedCursorInfoCompressionType


Can you please elaborate what is the metadata of ManagedLedger and
ManagedCursor?
Where is that metadata saved to?
Can you elaborate the managed ledger role in short - it's the underlying
object for topics right?

I would be grateful if you can expand the PIP, so the reader will have
answers to those questions when reading it.


On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:28 PM Enrico Olivelli  wrote:

> Makes sense to me.
> Thanks for your contribution
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 11 mag 2023 alle ore 18:01 lifepuzzlefun
>  ha scritto:
> >
> > Dear Pulsar community,
> >
> >
> > I create a pip aim to add configuration on size based metadata
> compresssion.
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20307
> >
> >
> > We welcome your feedback and suggestions on this proposal.
> >
>

Re: Look at the fresh Apache Pulsar website!

2023-05-22 Thread tison 
Given that the PIP has already been accepted and the PR is open for review
for two weeks, this announcement was posted the last week, and we received
approvals from Yu (PMC member), tison (committer), and Asaf, I'm going to
merge the PR in the next few hours.

We already agree on the direction, so any further improvement should be
follow-ups instead of blockers.

Best,
tison.


Yu  于2023年5月19日周五 10:01写道：

> Hi Kiryl,
>
> Thanks for your great contribution. The new look is more clean and
> professional!
>
> I've checked the whole design and commented on the doc layout [1]. Can you
> please take a look? Thank you!
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/560#issuecomment-1553900225
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:13 PM Kiryl Valkovich  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In PIP-249, Asaf Mesika
> > proposed the Pulsar website redesign plan.
> > In short, the point is that the website should reflect that Pulsar is a
> > modern and well-maintained technology.
> >
> > Emidio Cardeira prepared the home page design, and we at Teal Tools<
> > https://teal.tools/> took care of the coding part.
> > Big thanks to tison for the PR review and technical support.
> >
> > The current changes affect only the visual look.
> > Further site content improvements will be done iteratively. I invite you
> > to look at PIP-261 by
> Asaf.
> >
> > Feel free to express your thoughts and tell us about some bugs.
> > The PR will be merged in the next few days.
> >
> > Links:
> > - Demo: https://pulsar-site-pip-249.vercel.app/
> > - PIP-249: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19611
> > - PIP-249 PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/560
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> > --
> > Kiryl Valkovich
> > Teal Tools Inc.
> >
> >
>