Re: Flex2Royale

2017-10-11 Thread Peter Ent
I have a new version of the Flex to Royale comparison table. You can find
it here:
http://home.apache.org/~pent/Flex2RoyaleApp/

This table is built from the JSON output from the compiler has it scans
the ASDoc tags. I've included some new tags to document the comparison. I
still have some work to, including modifying the compiler to generate a
driver file (right now it uses a driver file I created). I had to modify
the html/P component and I added an html/PRE component. I'm waiting for
the rename to be finished before committing my changes (plus I'll probably
have a couple more).

Let me know if you think this table would be helpful to people migrating
from Flex and what else you would like to see in it (besides more
components).

—peter

On 10/10/17, 10:47 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:

>Its finally uploaded. You can find this new table here:
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fhome.apache.
>org%2F~pent%2FFlex2RoyaleApp=02%7C01%7C%7C483f4807c1584cabbfb508d50fe
>dd374%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636432436504771677
>a=zOAszJYRSMzxMaJSdC%2FAHiA66uINDUP7Uq8Y7Sz03Mc%3D=0
>
>I need to do some work on a couple Royale components to get this to look
>better, but that's the idea. I took the raw JSON and added a "commentary"
>element to a couple in Express. Again, this is driven from a config file
>to limit the number of JSON files it needs to open.
>
>Compare with previous version at:
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fhome.apache.
>org%2F~pent%2FFlex2Royale=02%7C01%7C%7C483f4807c1584cabbfb508d50fedd3
>74%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636432436504771677=D
>reDdizkpvEEYca4WgzRYY0DCjxbhhawlwWP2FxM59s%3D=0
>
>—peter
>
>On 10/10/17, 9:46 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>
>>I figured put -r would not work. So this morning I've been trying to
>>upload it. I didn't bother yesterday because I figured this would happen.
>>The put -r keeps timing out. For some reason a single file is fine, but a
>>mass of files keeps failing. Probably my internet connection. I will keep
>>doing it piecemeal throughout the day; that should work.
>>
>>‹peter
>>
>>On 10/10/17, 12:28 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>
>>>Doesn't "put -r" work?  See [1].  I think the key is to use mkdir to
>>>make
>>>the destination folder on the server before using put.
>>>
>>>HTH,
>>>-Alex
>>>
>>>[1] 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackov
>>>e
>>>r
>>>flow.com%2Fquestions%2F10084941%2Fhow-can-i-upload-an-entire-fol=02
>>>%
>>>7
>>>C01%7C%7Ce14c075efb57450f7bde08d50f9770f3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>c
>>>e
>>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636432065483689350=VKFE3jSG5bSlfwo%2Bcg7%2FgiZoLuWPuz
>>>W
>>>i
>>>1QIV4S1m%2B5c%3D=0
>>>der-that-contains-other-folders-using-sftp-on-li
>>>
>>>On 10/9/17, 1:55 PM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>>>
I've built a little app that produces a table that looks through the
ASDoc JSON files. This app is driven by a config file that contains a
map
from Flex components to Royale Express components. For each Royale
component listed in the config file, the corresponding ASDoc JSON file
is
loaded and if it has a new ASDoc tag, @commentary, it shows that in the
last column.

I would like to show this to you, but I cannot figure out how to post
the
site (about 6 MB, its js-debug) to my home.apache.org account. I can
transfer the file there as a .tar but it looks like ssh is prevented on
home.apache.org at this point.

Using ASDoc + a driver file is one way to do this. Another way is to
just
scan all of the ASDoc JSON files looking for some clues about which
classes could be compared to Flex components. I would say this would
mean
adding some more ASDoc tags (e.g., @flexcomponent, @flexdocurl) and it
may take longer to scan through all the JSON files and build the table.

I need to sync up with changes to the repos and then I'll publish my
example in the royale-as/examples directory so you can build it for
yourselves and take a look.

‹peter
>>>
>>
>



Re: Initial Board Report

2017-10-11 Thread Alex Harui
I just looked it over and made a small change to the trademarks section.
I'm fine with you filing it when you are back from holiday.  Use the
whimsy.apache.org tool to file it and make sure you use the Reflow button
and check that it didn't munge any headers.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 10/11/17, 3:39 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

>Cool. I did not know about that tool.
>
>Thanks!
>
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Niclas Hedhman  wrote:
>> 
>> Tip; 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freporter
>>.apache.org=02%7C01%7C%7C51e05752a7f64b46bf0708d510946064%7Cfa7b1b5a
>>7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636433151811360627=kTzWO5IpiAE6t
>>NOm3GXuzqldVHdNujqVBZZ1S7Usrlk%3D=0 will help you with a
>>template and some
>> basic information.
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Harbs  wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for working on this.
>>> 
>>> Yeah. I have very limited availability this week. I will try to go over
>>> what you’ve done today. I could probably file it today if necessary.
>>> 
>>> If folks would like more discussion I can file it on Friday or Sunday,
>>>but
>>> there shouldn’t be much to report. Hopefully the next report should be
>>>full
>>> of good content. :-)
>>> 
>>> Harbs
>>> 
 On Oct 10, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Alex Harui 
>>> wrote:
 
 I believe Harbs is out on holiday, and I should have made sure he sent
 something like this before.
 
 As a new Apache project, the PMC has to file board reports every month
>>> for
 the first three months.  Some projects draft their board reports on a
 wiki.  I think that's worth trying and I posted a rough draft/template
 based on the Flex reports I used to file at [1].  Board Reports are
due 7
 days before the board meeting which would be this Wednesday the 11th,
but
 I think Harbs isn't back until the 12th.  Normally, other PMC members
 could file the report for him, but I think being a day late isn't
going
>>> to
 be a big deal given we won't have much to report since the project
didn't
 really get launched until the last week or so of September, and this
will
 give Harbs a chance to try out the board reporting tools he will be
using
 for at least the next year.
 
 Anyway, the rest of the PMC should try to reach agreement on the
report
>>> so
 when Harbs comes back it is mostly ready to be submitted.
 
 Thanks,
 -Alex
 
 [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FBoard-Report-2017-10=02%7C01%
7C%7C51e05752a7f64b46bf0708d510946064%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee
1%7C0%7C0%7C636433151811360627=QhvMaUHGJF%2Bg2uOD4fKs%2FtmPd7zEd8
PmrBmcFcFoMHc%3D=0
 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpolygene.
>>apache.org=02%7C01%7C%7C51e05752a7f64b46bf0708d510946064%7Cfa7b1b5a7
>>b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636433151811360627=ulfXREzi06L7Bv
>>9axjetyz%2Flexg7Zx1JdqN3TqxPl1Y%3D=0 - New Energy for Java
>



Re: Initial Board Report

2017-10-11 Thread Harbs
Thanks for working on this.

Yeah. I have very limited availability this week. I will try to go over what 
you’ve done today. I could probably file it today if necessary.

If folks would like more discussion I can file it on Friday or Sunday, but 
there shouldn’t be much to report. Hopefully the next report should be full of 
good content. :-)

Harbs

> On Oct 10, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> I believe Harbs is out on holiday, and I should have made sure he sent
> something like this before.
> 
> As a new Apache project, the PMC has to file board reports every month for
> the first three months.  Some projects draft their board reports on a
> wiki.  I think that's worth trying and I posted a rough draft/template
> based on the Flex reports I used to file at [1].  Board Reports are due 7
> days before the board meeting which would be this Wednesday the 11th, but
> I think Harbs isn't back until the 12th.  Normally, other PMC members
> could file the report for him, but I think being a day late isn't going to
> be a big deal given we won't have much to report since the project didn't
> really get launched until the last week or so of September, and this will
> give Harbs a chance to try out the board reporting tools he will be using
> for at least the next year.
> 
> Anyway, the rest of the PMC should try to reach agreement on the report so
> when Harbs comes back it is mostly ready to be submitted.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Board-Report-2017-10
>