Re: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Farid Zaripov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:27 AM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1 LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1 limits DIFF 0 random_shuffle 0DIFF 21.string.io.stdcxx-250 ABRTNOUT 21.string.stdcxx-231 ABRTNOUT 22.locale.ctype.is331 0 22.locale.ctype.narrow 0 381 5 0 22.locale.num.put 96 24 22.locale.num.put.stdcxx-2 ABRTNOUT 27.basic.ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-766 ABRTNOUT 27.ostream.unformatted.stdcxx-626ABRTNOUT 27.ostream 2 0 2 0 27.streambuf.imbue.stdcxx-307ABRTNOUT 27.stringbuf.overflow.stdcxx-795 ABRTNOUT The results in 15d configuration and on icc 10.0 in 12d and 15d are the same. Farid. I'm curious what it means when nothing is shown in a cell. i.e. what were the results of the limits test for the last two configurations? Actually I have compared the src/lib pairs 4.2.0/4.2.0 vs 4.2.0/4.2.1 only and then 4.2.1/4.2.1 vs 4.2.1/4.2.0 only. So empty cells means that the results has not changed due to replacing the library file. But how can there be empty cells in the first and last columns where the library wasn't replaced? As for the limits example results, I missed that the results has changed. Here the results for limits: msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1 LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1 limits DIFF 0DIFF 0 And this is a good thing! It means that 4.2.1 fixes whatever was causing the DIFF in 4.2.0 :) Martin
RE: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d
> >-Original Message- > >From: Farid Zaripov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:27 AM > >To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > >Subject: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d > > > >msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1 > > LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1 > >limits DIFF 0 > >random_shuffle 0DIFF > >21.string.io.stdcxx-250 ABRTNOUT > >21.string.stdcxx-231 ABRTNOUT > >22.locale.ctype.is331 0 > >22.locale.ctype.narrow 0 381 5 0 > >22.locale.num.put 96 24 > >22.locale.num.put.stdcxx-2 ABRTNOUT > >27.basic.ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-766 ABRTNOUT > >27.ostream.unformatted.stdcxx-626ABRTNOUT > >27.ostream 2 0 2 0 > >27.streambuf.imbue.stdcxx-307ABRTNOUT > >27.stringbuf.overflow.stdcxx-795 ABRTNOUT > > > > > > The results in 15d configuration and on icc 10.0 in 12d > and 15d are > >the same. > > > >Farid. > > > > I'm curious what it means when nothing is shown in a cell. > i.e. what were the results of the limits test for the last > two configurations? Actually I have compared the src/lib pairs 4.2.0/4.2.0 vs 4.2.0/4.2.1 only and then 4.2.1/4.2.1 vs 4.2.1/4.2.0 only. So empty cells means that the results has not changed due to replacing the library file. As for the limits example results, I missed that the results has changed. Here the results for limits: msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1 LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1 limits DIFF 0DIFF 0 Farid.
RE: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d
>-Original Message- >From: Farid Zaripov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:27 AM >To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org >Subject: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d > >msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1 > LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1 >limits DIFF 0 >random_shuffle 0DIFF >21.string.io.stdcxx-250 ABRTNOUT >21.string.stdcxx-231 ABRTNOUT >22.locale.ctype.is331 0 >22.locale.ctype.narrow 0 381 5 0 >22.locale.num.put 96 24 >22.locale.num.put.stdcxx-2 ABRTNOUT >27.basic.ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-766 ABRTNOUT >27.ostream.unformatted.stdcxx-626ABRTNOUT >27.ostream 2 0 2 0 >27.streambuf.imbue.stdcxx-307ABRTNOUT >27.stringbuf.overflow.stdcxx-795 ABRTNOUT > > > The results in 15d configuration and on icc 10.0 in 12d and >15d are the same. > >Farid. > I'm curious what it means when nothing is shown in a cell. i.e. what were the results of the limits test for the last two configurations? >
