[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This vote is now closed and passes with 7 binding +1 votes, 1 non-binding +1 
vote and no +0 or -1 votes.

Vote tally (* indicates a binding vote):

+1:
Juntaek Lim*
Bobby Evans*
Sriharsha Chintalapani*
Derek Dagit*
Kishorkumar Patil*
方孝健(玄弟)
P. Taylor Goetz*
Parth Brahmbhatt*

+0:
-1:

(Note that there was 1 non-binding +1 vote that appears to have been meant for 
a separate thread. I have left that vote out of the tally.)

Thanks to all who voted, and especially all those who contributed to this 
release. This is a pretty momentous release.

I will release the artifacts from staging and announce the release once the 
distribution mirrors have had a chance to sync.

-Taylor


> On Oct 23, 2015, at 4:26 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> 
> -Taylor



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[Parth Brahmbhatt]

+1

Tested locally.

On 10/29/15, 12:46 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz"  wrote:

>+1 (binding)
>
>Ran a suite of fault tolerance tests.
>
>-Taylor
>
>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 4:26 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>> 
>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
>> 
>> Full list of changes in this release:
>> 
>> 
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGE
>>LOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>> 
>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>> 
>> 
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401f
>>d05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>> 
>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>> 
>> 
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-s
>>torm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
>> 
>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> 
>> 
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;h
>>b=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>> 
>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>> 
>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>> 
>> -Taylor
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

+1 (binding)

Ran a suite of fault tolerance tests.

-Taylor

> On Oct 23, 2015, at 4:26 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> 
> -Taylor



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[임정택]

Cody,

You may want to leave this mail to "[VOTE] Accept Alibaba JStorm Code
Donation".

Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

2015-10-29 21:43 GMT+09:00 Cody Innowhere :

> +1
>
> I think programming languages as Clojure and Java is no gap for common
> developers, but it might be a problem for industrial users, who may not be
>  willing or have time to dive into the details of the Clojure core, and
> this is the great advantage of a Java core storm and will definitely
> attract more contributors to the community and improve the development of
> storm.
> Also, as JStorm describes, it has been tested in vast industrial use cases
> for stability and efficiency, if JStorm were merged into storm, it will
> surely make storm better & stronger.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:19 PM, 方孝健(玄弟) 
> wrote:
>
> > +1， I think it is great!
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: Bobby Evans [mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID]
> > 发送时间: 2015年10月26日 22:24
> > 收件人: dev@storm.apache.org
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
> >
> > +1 looks good, built from the git tag and ran some simple test.
> >  - Bobby
> >
> >
> >  On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:47 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> >
> >
> >-
> >
> >   test passed : OK
> >   -- extract source tar
> >   -- build via "mvn clean install”
> >
> >   -
> >
> >   deploy to docker cluster using wurstmeister/storm-docker : OK
> >   -
> >
> >   topology tests via storm-starter : OK
> >   -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
> >
> >   -
> >
> >   test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill) :
> OK
> >
> >
> > Looks good overall. +1.
> >
> > 2015-10-24 5:26 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :
> >
> > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
> > >
> > > Full list of changes in this release:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHA
> > > NGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> > >
> > > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b1484
> > > 01fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cb
> > > c2b29
> > >
> > > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apach
> > > e-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> > >
> > > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEY
> > > S;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> > >
> > > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> > >
> > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0 [ ]  0 No opinion [
> > > ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> > >
> > > -Taylor
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Name : 임 정택
> > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter :
> > http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[Cody Innowhere]

+1

I think programming languages as Clojure and Java is no gap for common
developers, but it might be a problem for industrial users, who may not be
 willing or have time to dive into the details of the Clojure core, and
this is the great advantage of a Java core storm and will definitely
attract more contributors to the community and improve the development of
storm.
Also, as JStorm describes, it has been tested in vast industrial use cases
for stability and efficiency, if JStorm were merged into storm, it will
surely make storm better & stronger.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:19 PM, 方孝健(玄弟) 
wrote:

> +1， I think it is great!
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Bobby Evans [mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID]
> 发送时间: 2015年10月26日 22:24
> 收件人: dev@storm.apache.org
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
>
> +1 looks good, built from the git tag and ran some simple test.
>  - Bobby
>
>
>  On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:47 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>
>
>-
>
>   test passed : OK
>   -- extract source tar
>   -- build via "mvn clean install”
>
>   -
>
>   deploy to docker cluster using wurstmeister/storm-docker : OK
>   -
>
>   topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>   -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>
>   -
>
>   test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill) : OK
>
>
> Looks good overall. +1.
>
> 2015-10-24 5:26 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :
>
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHA
> > NGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b1484
> > 01fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cb
> > c2b29
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apach
> > e-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEY
> > S;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0 [ ]  0 No opinion [
> > ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter :
> http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>
>
>
>

答复: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[方孝健(玄弟)]

+1， I think it is great!

-邮件原件-
发件人: Bobby Evans [mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID] 
发送时间: 2015年10月26日 22:24
收件人: dev@storm.apache.org
主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

+1 looks good, built from the git tag and ran some simple test.
 - Bobby 


 On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:47 PM, 임정택  wrote:
   

   -

  test passed : OK
  -- extract source tar
  -- build via "mvn clean install”

  -

  deploy to docker cluster using wurstmeister/storm-docker : OK
  -

  topology tests via storm-starter : OK
  -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode

  -

  test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill) : OK


Looks good overall. +1.

2015-10-24 5:26 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHA
> NGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b1484
> 01fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cb
> c2b29
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apach
> e-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEY
> S;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0 [ ]  0 No opinion [ 
> ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
>



--
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter : 
http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[Kishorkumar Patil]

+1.
Verified by running some sample tests.
-Kishor 


 On Monday, October 26, 2015 1:17 PM, Derek Dagit 
 wrote:
   

 apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz.sha
apache-storm-0.10.0.tar.gz.sha

I found these two files are gzipped, but the other *sha files are OK.

 -- 
Derek


- Original Message -
From: P. Taylor Goetz 
To: dev@storm.apache.org
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 3:26 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.

-Taylor 


  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[Derek Dagit]

apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz.sha
apache-storm-0.10.0.tar.gz.sha

I found these two files are gzipped, but the other *sha files are OK.

 -- 
Derek


- Original Message -
From: P. Taylor Goetz 
To: dev@storm.apache.org
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 3:26 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.

-Taylor 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[Harsha]

+1
1. Ran unit tests
2. Deployed example topologies
3. Verified artifacts

-Harsha

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 07:23 AM, Bobby Evans wrote:
> +1 looks good, built from the git tag and ran some simple test.
>  - Bobby 
> 
> 
>  On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:47 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>
> 
>    -
> 
>   test passed : OK
>   -- extract source tar
>   -- build via "mvn clean install”
> 
>   -
> 
>   deploy to docker cluster using wurstmeister/storm-docker : OK
>   -
> 
>   topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>   -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
> 
>   -
> 
>   test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill) : OK
> 
> 
> Looks good overall. +1.
> 
> 2015-10-24 5:26 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :
> 
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
> 
>   

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[Bobby Evans]

+1 looks good, built from the git tag and ran some simple test.
 - Bobby 


 On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:47 PM, 임정택  wrote:
   

   -

  test passed : OK
  -- extract source tar
  -- build via "mvn clean install”

  -

  deploy to docker cluster using wurstmeister/storm-docker : OK
  -

  topology tests via storm-starter : OK
  -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode

  -

  test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill) : OK


Looks good overall. +1.

2015-10-24 5:26 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[임정택]

   -

   test passed : OK
   -- extract source tar
   -- build via "mvn clean install”

   -

   deploy to docker cluster using wurstmeister/storm-docker : OK
   -

   topology tests via storm-starter : OK
   -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode

   -

   test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill) : OK


Looks good overall. +1.

2015-10-24 5:26 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1025

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.

-Taylor


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[P. Taylor Goetz]

Canceling this vote since I missed some critical issues.

Will cut a new release once the issues are resolved and merged.

-Taylor

> On Sep 12, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Harsha  wrote:
> 
> Taylor,
>   STORM-1039 & STORM-1042 are blockers without these UI won't
>   work. We need to include these in the release as well.
> Thanks,
> Harsha
> 
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015, at 10:41 PM, 임정택 wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> - test passed : OK
>> -- extract source tar
>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
>> 
>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>> 
>> - test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK
>> 
>> Looks good overall.
>> 
>> Btw, there're some issues which seems to point to 0.10.0, STORM-912
>>  and STORM-1039
>> , STORM-1042
>> .
>> I'm not sure we should resolve these before releasing.
>> No issue is marked as blocker, but STORM-1042 is marked as critical, and
>> it
>> seems to be regression.
>> 
>> 2015-09-12 5:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :
>> 
>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>>> 
>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>> 
>>> hhttps://
>>> git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a
>>> 
>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=66004167d440d418ec6c82c6a134a9c213d632b2;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a
>>> 
>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/
>>> 
>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>> 
>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1019
>>> 
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>>> 
>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Taylor
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Name : 임 정택
>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[Harsha]

Taylor,
   STORM-1039 & STORM-1042 are blockers without these UI won't
   work. We need to include these in the release as well.
Thanks,
Harsha

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015, at 10:41 PM, 임정택 wrote:
> +1
> 
> - test passed : OK
> -- extract source tar
> -- build via "mvn clean install”
> 
> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
> 
> - test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK
> 
> Looks good overall.
> 
> Btw, there're some issues which seems to point to 0.10.0, STORM-912
>  and STORM-1039
> , STORM-1042
> .
> I'm not sure we should resolve these before releasing.
> No issue is marked as blocker, but STORM-1042 is marked as critical, and
> it
> seems to be regression.
> 
> 2015-09-12 5:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :
> 
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> > hhttps://
> > git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=66004167d440d418ec6c82c6a134a9c213d632b2;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1019
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Taylor
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[임정택]

+1

- test passed : OK
-- extract source tar
-- build via "mvn clean install”

- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode

- test REST APIs (retrieve / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK

Looks good overall.

Btw, there're some issues which seems to point to 0.10.0, STORM-912
 and STORM-1039
, STORM-1042
.
I'm not sure we should resolve these before releasing.
No issue is marked as blocker, but STORM-1042 is marked as critical, and it
seems to be regression.

2015-09-12 5:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
> hhttps://
> git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=66004167d440d418ec6c82c6a134a9c213d632b2;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1019
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.

Full list of changes in this release:

hhttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=66004167d440d418ec6c82c6a134a9c213d632b2;hb=f6c0abb0bd76867b48c7b7c7cfdfdc7e0e6f483a

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1019

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This vote is now closed and passes with 5 binding +1 votes, 1 non-binding +1 
vote, and no -1 votes.

Vote tally (* indicates a binding vote):

Jungtaek Lim
Bobby Evans*
Kyle Nusbaum*
Kishorkumar Patil*
Sriharsha Chintalapani*
P. Taylor Goetz*

I will release the artifacts from staging and prep the announcement.

Thanks to all who voted, and congrats to everyone who contributed. This is an 
important release.

-Taylor

On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[P. Taylor Goetz]

+1

-Taylor

On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[Sriharsha Chintalapani]

+1 .
1) verified secure cluster and non-secure cluster
2) verified artifacts and keys

Thanks,
Harsha


On June 10, 2015 at 10:33:14 AM, Kishorkumar Patil 
(kpa...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid) wrote:

+1  
-Kishor  


On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:06 PM, Kyle Nusbaum 
 wrote:  


+1 -- Kyle  



    On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:40 AM, Bobby Evans 
 wrote:  
   

+1 - Bobby  



    On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:52 AM, 임정택  wrote:  
   

+1 (non-binding)  

- test passed : OK  
-- extract source tar  
-- build via "mvn clean install”  
- topology tests via storm-starter : OK  
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode  
- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK  
-- upload / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill works fine  
-- confirmed that STORM-853 was fixed  
- kill topology and restart nimbus immediately : OK  
-- confirmed that STORM-856 was fixed  

Looks good overall.  

Thanks!  
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)  


2015-06-10 11:18 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :  

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.  
>  
> Full list of changes in this release:  
>  
>  
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>   
>  
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:  
>  
>  
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>   
>  
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:  
>  
>  
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
>   
>  
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:  
>  
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/  
>  
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:  
>  
>  
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>   
>  
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:  
>  
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017  
>  
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.  
>  
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.  
>  
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.  
>  
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta  
> [ ]  0 No opinion  
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...  
>  
> Thanks,  
> Taylor  
>  



--  
Name : 임 정택  
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net  
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior  
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[Kishorkumar Patil]

+1
-Kishor 


 On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:06 PM, Kyle Nusbaum 
 wrote:
   

 +1 -- Kyle
 


    On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:40 AM, Bobby Evans 
 wrote:
  

 +1 - Bobby
 


    On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:52 AM, 임정택  wrote:
  

 +1 (non-binding)

- test passed : OK
-- extract source tar
-- build via "mvn clean install”
- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK
-- upload / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill works fine
-- confirmed that STORM-853 was fixed
- kill topology and restart nimbus immediately : OK
-- confirmed that STORM-856 was fixed

Looks good overall.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)


2015-06-10 11:18 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior





  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[Kyle Nusbaum]

+1 -- Kyle
 


 On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:40 AM, Bobby Evans 
 wrote:
   

 +1 - Bobby
 


    On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:52 AM, 임정택  wrote:
  

 +1 (non-binding)

- test passed : OK
-- extract source tar
-- build via "mvn clean install”
- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK
-- upload / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill works fine
-- confirmed that STORM-853 was fixed
- kill topology and restart nimbus immediately : OK
-- confirmed that STORM-856 was fixed

Looks good overall.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)


2015-06-10 11:18 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior



  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[Bobby Evans]

+1 - Bobby
 


 On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:52 AM, 임정택  wrote:
   

 +1 (non-binding)

- test passed : OK
-- extract source tar
-- build via "mvn clean install”
- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK
-- upload / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill works fine
-- confirmed that STORM-853 was fixed
- kill topology and restart nimbus immediately : OK
-- confirmed that STORM-856 was fixed

Looks good overall.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)


2015-06-10 11:18 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[임정택]

+1 (non-binding)

- test passed : OK
-- extract source tar
-- build via "mvn clean install”
- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : OK
-- upload / activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill works fine
-- confirmed that STORM-853 was fixed
- kill topology and restart nimbus immediately : OK
-- confirmed that STORM-856 was fixed

Looks good overall.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)


2015-06-10 11:18 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz :

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta.

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0-beta:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b965da3a244806eb9bfd8d7d943f72891c362cbf;hb=d1e10ceecba4f87f1e70bf02ec63094eef4f4bb3

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-beta-rc1/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1017

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta. 

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

Per the discussion, I’m canceling this vote. I will prepare a new release 
candidate.

-Taylor

On Jun 5, 2015, at 3:53 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Sriharsha Chintalapani]

I am +1 on releasing BETA.

Thanks,
Harsha


On June 9, 2015 at 10:59:59 AM, Kyle Nusbaum (knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid) 
wrote:

Thanks for the description, Taylor. I'm happy with the release process 
including 'BETA' as you described.  
We should document the process, though, so it's concrete. Maybe a few weeks as 
beta before we either decide we need to release another beta, or decide it's 
stable enough to call an actual release.  -- Kyle  



On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 12:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:  


Given the severity of STORM-856 and the discussion around whether we want to 
label this release a “beta” or not, I’m now inclined to cancel the vote and 
prepare a new release with the following fixes:  

* STORM-856  
* STORM-853  
* STORM-813  

My question is do we want this release to be a “beta” release or not?  

-Taylor  



On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Kyle Nusbaum  
wrote:  

> Rather than a 'beta' release, can we just start publishing the RC's?  
> That seems to me like it might be better for the community, as it more 
> closely reflects our development model.  
> For the future, I don't see a reason to not package the RC's and then at some 
> point (when?) publish a beta. The beta kind of makes sense in this context, 
> due to the finding of a few relatively major bugs right before the release, 
> but in general I think we'd have to pick a sort of arbitrary point to publish 
> the 'beta'. Then when we fix bugs, do we release another beta? Do we end up 
> with RC1, RC2, RC3, Beta1, Beta2, etc? I'd rather keep it simpler than that 
> by just publishing the RCs.  
>  -- Kyle  
>  
>  
>  
>    On Monday, June 8, 2015 9:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
>wrote:  
>  
>  
> Okay. Let's proceed with the release, and label it as a beta.  
>  
> We should consider setting a deadline for the next release, and give it 
> enough time for feedback on the current beta.  
>  
> Any thoughts on a timeline?  
>  
> -Taylor  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:38 PM, 임정택  wrote:  
>>  
>> Either beta or RC is great for me.  
>> 0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by  
>> users or dog fooding.  
>> I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my  
>> team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to  
>> test before releasing.  
>>  
>> Thanks!  
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)  
>>  
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:  
>>  
>>> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many  
>>> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.  
>>> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the  
>>> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.  
>>>  
>>> - Bobby  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>    On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz   
>>> wrote:  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.  
>>>  
>>> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?  
>>>  
>>> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the  
>>> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,  
>>> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.  
>>>  
>>> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even  
>>> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the  
>>> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,  
>>> even if they don't make changes to the core code).  
>>>  
>>> -Taylor  
>>>  
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit   
>>>> wrote:  
>>>>  
>>>> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it  
>>> never comes up  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.  
>>>>  
>>>> --  
>>>> Derek  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>   
>>>> From: P. Taylor Goetz   
>>>> To: dev@storm.apache.org  
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM  
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will  
>>> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Parth Brahmbhatt]

I agree, it is better to at least mark this release as Beta given the
amount of changes introduced. I think the bug fix releases (minor
releases) can be directly released as stable releases but for a major
release like this one it is better to mark it as beta , allow some users
to try it out and report any issues.

Thanks
Parth

On 6/9/15, 10:58 AM, "Kyle Nusbaum"  wrote:

>We should document the process, though, so it's concrete. Maybe a few
>weeks as beta before we either decide we need to release another beta, or
>decide it's stable enough to call an actual release.  -- Kyle
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Kyle Nusbaum]

Thanks for the description, Taylor. I'm happy with the release process 
including 'BETA' as you described.
We should document the process, though, so it's concrete. Maybe a few weeks as 
beta before we either decide we need to release another beta, or decide it's 
stable enough to call an actual release.  -- Kyle
 


 On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 12:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
wrote:
   

 Given the severity of STORM-856 and the discussion around whether we want to 
label this release a “beta” or not, I’m now inclined to cancel the vote and 
prepare a new release with the following fixes:

* STORM-856
* STORM-853
* STORM-813

My question is do we want this release to be a “beta” release or not?

-Taylor



On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Kyle Nusbaum  
wrote:

> Rather than a 'beta' release, can we just start publishing the RC's? 
> That seems to me like it might be better for the community, as it more 
> closely reflects our development model.
> For the future, I don't see a reason to not package the RC's and then at some 
> point (when?) publish a beta. The beta kind of makes sense in this context, 
> due to the finding of a few relatively major bugs right before the release, 
> but in general I think we'd have to pick a sort of arbitrary point to publish 
> the 'beta'. Then when we fix bugs, do we release another beta? Do we end up 
> with RC1, RC2, RC3, Beta1, Beta2, etc? I'd rather keep it simpler than that 
> by just publishing the RCs.
>  -- Kyle
> 
> 
> 
>    On Monday, June 8, 2015 9:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> 
> Okay. Let's proceed with the release, and label it as a beta.
> 
> We should consider setting a deadline for the next release, and give it 
> enough time for feedback on the current beta.
> 
> Any thoughts on a timeline?
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:38 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>> 
>> Either beta or RC is great for me.
>> 0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by
>> users or dog fooding.
>> I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my
>> team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to
>> test before releasing.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:
>> 
>>> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many
>>> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.
>>> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the
>>> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.
>>> 
>>> - Bobby
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
>>> 
>>> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the
>>> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,
>>> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even
>>> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the
>>> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,
>>> even if they don't make changes to the core code).
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it
>>> never comes up
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Derek
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
>>>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will
>>> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST
>>> upload API because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue
>>> in the announcement.
>>>> 
>>>> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start
>>> planning for a 0.10.1 release soon.
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

Given the severity of STORM-856 and the discussion around whether we want to 
label this release a “beta” or not, I’m now inclined to cancel the vote and 
prepare a new release with the following fixes:

* STORM-856
* STORM-853
* STORM-813

My question is do we want this release to be a “beta” release or not?

-Taylor



On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Kyle Nusbaum  
wrote:

> Rather than a 'beta' release, can we just start publishing the RC's? 
> That seems to me like it might be better for the community, as it more 
> closely reflects our development model.
> For the future, I don't see a reason to not package the RC's and then at some 
> point (when?) publish a beta. The beta kind of makes sense in this context, 
> due to the finding of a few relatively major bugs right before the release, 
> but in general I think we'd have to pick a sort of arbitrary point to publish 
> the 'beta'. Then when we fix bugs, do we release another beta? Do we end up 
> with RC1, RC2, RC3, Beta1, Beta2, etc? I'd rather keep it simpler than that 
> by just publishing the RCs.
>  -- Kyle
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2015 9:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Okay. Let's proceed with the release, and label it as a beta.
> 
> We should consider setting a deadline for the next release, and give it 
> enough time for feedback on the current beta.
> 
> Any thoughts on a timeline?
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:38 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>> 
>> Either beta or RC is great for me.
>> 0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by
>> users or dog fooding.
>> I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my
>> team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to
>> test before releasing.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:
>> 
>>> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many
>>> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.
>>> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the
>>> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.
>>> 
>>> - Bobby
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
>>> 
>>> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the
>>> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,
>>> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even
>>> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the
>>> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,
>>> even if they don't make changes to the core code).
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it
>>> never comes up
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Derek
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
>>>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will
>>> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST
>>> upload API because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue
>>> in the announcement.
>>>> 
>>>> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start
>>> planning for a 0.10.1 release soon.
>>>> 
>>>> -Taylor
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> OK, I see your point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>>>>> huge changeset.
>>>>> I don't me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

The pattern that I’ve been following (and that many projects use) is to use the 
“RC” designator during the voting process. So if a vote is canceled, the RC 
number is incremented. This is to make it easier to differentiate between the 
voting threads. If the vote succeeds (i.e. isn’t canceled), the “RC” designator 
is dropped from the release name.

So if we were labeling this as a beta, and it were the second release vote, the 
thread title would be “[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta (rc2)”. If the 
vote succeeded the release version would be “Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta”.

We could then one or more betas, and once we decide (via DISCUSS thread) to 
drop the beta label, and go through the voting/rc cycle until we reached 
consensus on a release package.

Does that make sense?

-Taylor

On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Kyle Nusbaum  
wrote:

> Rather than a 'beta' release, can we just start publishing the RC's? 
> That seems to me like it might be better for the community, as it more 
> closely reflects our development model.
> For the future, I don't see a reason to not package the RC's and then at some 
> point (when?) publish a beta. The beta kind of makes sense in this context, 
> due to the finding of a few relatively major bugs right before the release, 
> but in general I think we'd have to pick a sort of arbitrary point to publish 
> the 'beta'. Then when we fix bugs, do we release another beta? Do we end up 
> with RC1, RC2, RC3, Beta1, Beta2, etc? I'd rather keep it simpler than that 
> by just publishing the RCs.
>  -- Kyle
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2015 9:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Okay. Let's proceed with the release, and label it as a beta.
> 
> We should consider setting a deadline for the next release, and give it 
> enough time for feedback on the current beta.
> 
> Any thoughts on a timeline?
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:38 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>> 
>> Either beta or RC is great for me.
>> 0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by
>> users or dog fooding.
>> I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my
>> team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to
>> test before releasing.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:
>> 
>>> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many
>>> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.
>>> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the
>>> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.
>>> 
>>> - Bobby
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
>>> 
>>> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the
>>> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,
>>> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even
>>> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the
>>> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,
>>> even if they don't make changes to the core code).
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it
>>> never comes up
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Derek
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
>>>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will
>>> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST
>>> upload API because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue
>>> in the announcement.
>>>> 
>>>> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 que

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Kyle Nusbaum]

Rather than a 'beta' release, can we just start publishing the RC's? 
That seems to me like it might be better for the community, as it more closely 
reflects our development model.
For the future, I don't see a reason to not package the RC's and then at some 
point (when?) publish a beta. The beta kind of makes sense in this context, due 
to the finding of a few relatively major bugs right before the release, but in 
general I think we'd have to pick a sort of arbitrary point to publish the 
'beta'. Then when we fix bugs, do we release another beta? Do we end up with 
RC1, RC2, RC3, Beta1, Beta2, etc? I'd rather keep it simpler than that by just 
publishing the RCs.
 -- Kyle
 


 On Monday, June 8, 2015 9:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
   

 Okay. Let's proceed with the release, and label it as a beta.

We should consider setting a deadline for the next release, and give it enough 
time for feedback on the current beta.

Any thoughts on a timeline?

-Taylor




> On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:38 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> 
> Either beta or RC is great for me.
> 0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by
> users or dog fooding.
> I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my
> team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to
> test before releasing.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:
> 
>> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many
>> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.
>> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the
>> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.
>> 
>> - Bobby
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
>> 
>> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
>> 
>> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the
>> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,
>> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.
>> 
>> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even
>> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the
>> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,
>> even if they don't make changes to the core code).
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it
>> never comes up
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Derek
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
>>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will
>> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST
>> upload API because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue
>> in the announcement.
>>> 
>>> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start
>> planning for a 0.10.1 release soon.
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, I see your point.
>>>> 
>>>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>>>> huge changeset.
>>>> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>>>> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and
>> reopen
>>>> vote.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>>>> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>>>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release
>> (soon).
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the big picture, the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

Okay. Let's proceed with the release, and label it as a beta.

We should consider setting a deadline for the next release, and give it enough 
time for feedback on the current beta.

Any thoughts on a timeline?

-Taylor




> On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:38 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> 
> Either beta or RC is great for me.
> 0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by
> users or dog fooding.
> I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my
> team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to
> test before releasing.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:
> 
>> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many
>> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.
>> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the
>> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.
>> 
>> - Bobby
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
>> 
>> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
>> 
>> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the
>> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,
>> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.
>> 
>> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even
>> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the
>> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,
>> even if they don't make changes to the core code).
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it
>> never comes up
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Derek
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
>>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will
>> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST
>> upload API because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue
>> in the announcement.
>>> 
>>> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start
>> planning for a 0.10.1 release soon.
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, I see your point.
>>>> 
>>>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>>>> huge changeset.
>>>> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>>>> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and
>> reopen
>>>> vote.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>>>> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>>>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release
>> (soon).
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>>>>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in
>> any
>>>>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 >
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>>>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>>>>> multiple arguments.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Here's my checklist.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - test passed : OK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[임정택]

Either beta or RC is great for me.
0.10.0 include many features but it seems not have time to be evaluated by
users or dog fooding.
I wanna get official version ASAP which is better for me to persuade my
team, but getting stable version is most important point, so I'd like to
test before releasing.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

2015년 6월 9일 화요일, Bobby Evans님이 작성한 메시지:

> I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many
> different areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example.
> Labeling 0.10.0 as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the
> relatively near term to move from beta to stable.
>
> - Bobby
>
>
>
>  On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
> wrote:
>
>
>  Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
>
> Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
>
> At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the
> new features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly,
> we probably should have switched to that model earlier.
>
> I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even
> if it is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the
> community that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership,
> even if they don't make changes to the core code).
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit 
> wrote:
> >
> > Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it
> never comes up
> >
> >
> > Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
> >
> > --
> > Derek
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: P. Taylor Goetz 
> > To: dev@storm.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will
> see a separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST
> upload API because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue
> in the announcement.
> >
> > From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start
> planning for a 0.10.1 release soon.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> >
> > OK, I see your point.
> >>
> >> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
> >> huge changeset.
> >> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
> >> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and
> reopen
> >> vote.
> >>
> >> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
> >> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> >>
> >>
> >> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
> >>
> >>
> >> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
> >>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release
> (soon).
> >>>
> >>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
> >>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in
> any
> >>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
> >>>
> >>> -Taylor
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 >
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
> >>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
> >>>> multiple arguments.)
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's my checklist.
> >>>>
> >>>> - test passed : OK
> >>>> -- extract source tar
> >>>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
> >>>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
> >>>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
> >>>> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
> >>>> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
> >>>> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
> >>>> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
> >>>>
> >>>> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed
> version
> >>>> of feature to 0.10.0.
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Derek Dagit]

- I am OK with labeling BETA.

- Fix for STORM-856: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/585

- Not a big deal, but I noticed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml files are 
getting bundled with the -src.


 
-- 
Derek 



- Original Message -
From: Bobby Evans 
To: "dev@storm.apache.org" 
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many different 
areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example. Labeling 0.10.0 
as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the relatively near term to 
move from beta to stable.

- Bobby




 On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
  

Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.

Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta? 

At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the new 
features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly, we 
probably should have switched to that model earlier.

I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even if it 
is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the community 
that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership, even if they 
don't make changes to the core code).

-Taylor

> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit  wrote:
> 
> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it never 
> comes up
> 
> 
> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
> 
> -- 
> Derek 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
> To: dev@storm.apache.org 
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
> 
> 
> 
> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will see a 
> separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST upload API 
> because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue in the 
> announcement.
> 
> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start planning for 
> a 0.10.1 release soon.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> 
> OK, I see your point.
>> 
>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>> huge changeset.
>> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
>> vote.
>> 
>> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
>> 
>> 
>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>>> 
>>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
>>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 > wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>>> multiple arguments.)
>>>> 
>>>> Here's my checklist.
>>>> 
>>>> - test passed : OK
>>>> -- extract source tar
>>>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
>>>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>>>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>>>> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
>>>> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
>>>> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
>>>> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
>>>> 
>>>> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
>>>> of feature to 0.10.0.
>>>> (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
>>>> 
>>>> Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
>>>> so
>>> 
>>> I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
>>>> acceptable.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 K

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Bobby Evans]

I think that would be great.  We expect there to be bug fixes in many different 
areas.  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example. Labeling 0.10.0 
as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the relatively near term to 
move from beta to stable.

- Bobby
 


 On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
   

 Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.

Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta? 

At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the new 
features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly, we 
probably should have switched to that model earlier.

I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even if it 
is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the community 
that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership, even if they 
don't make changes to the core code).

-Taylor

> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit  wrote:
> 
> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it never 
> comes up
> 
> 
> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
> 
> -- 
> Derek 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
> To: dev@storm.apache.org 
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
> 
> 
> 
> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will see a 
> separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST upload API 
> because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue in the 
> announcement.
> 
> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start planning for 
> a 0.10.1 release soon.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> 
> OK, I see your point.
>> 
>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>> huge changeset.
>> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
>> vote.
>> 
>> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
>> 
>> 
>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>>> 
>>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
>>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 > wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>>> multiple arguments.)
>>>> 
>>>> Here's my checklist.
>>>> 
>>>> - test passed : OK
>>>> -- extract source tar
>>>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
>>>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>>>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>>>> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
>>>> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
>>>> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
>>>> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
>>>> 
>>>> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
>>>> of feature to 0.10.0.
>>>> (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
>>>> 
>>>> Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
>>>> so
>>> 
>>> I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
>>>> acceptable.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil >>> :
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
>>>>> -Kishor
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz >>>> >
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.

Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta? 

At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the new 
features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly, we 
probably should have switched to that model earlier.

I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even if it 
is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the community 
that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership, even if they 
don't make changes to the core code).

-Taylor

> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit  wrote:
> 
> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it never 
> comes up
> 
> 
> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
> 
> -- 
> Derek 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: P. Taylor Goetz 
> To: dev@storm.apache.org 
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
> 
> 
> 
> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will see a 
> separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST upload API 
> because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue in the 
> announcement.
> 
> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start planning for 
> a 0.10.1 release soon.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:
> 
> OK, I see your point.
>> 
>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>> huge changeset.
>> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
>> vote.
>> 
>> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
>> 
>> 
>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>>> 
>>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
>>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 > wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>>> multiple arguments.)
>>>> 
>>>> Here's my checklist.
>>>> 
>>>> - test passed : OK
>>>> -- extract source tar
>>>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
>>>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>>>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>>>> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
>>>> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
>>>> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
>>>> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
>>>> 
>>>> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
>>>> of feature to 0.10.0.
>>>> (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
>>>> 
>>>> Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
>>>> so
>>> 
>>> I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
>>>> acceptable.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil >>> :
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
>>>>> -Kishor
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz >>>> >
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
>>>>> release candidate was built from that tag.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans 
>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Derek Dagit]

Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it never 
comes up


Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.

-- 
Derek 




From: P. Taylor Goetz 
To: dev@storm.apache.org 
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)



I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will see a 
separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST upload API 
because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue in the 
announcement.

>From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start planning for 
>a 0.10.1 release soon.

-Taylor




On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:

OK, I see your point.
>
>I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>huge changeset.
>I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
>vote.
>
>I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>
>Thanks!
>Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
>
>2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
>
>
>I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>>
>>In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>>features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
>>way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>>
>>-Taylor
>>
>>On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 > wrote:
>>
>>
>>Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>>(Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>>multiple arguments.)
>>>
>>>Here's my checklist.
>>>
>>>- test passed : OK
>>>-- extract source tar
>>>-- build via "mvn clean install”
>>>- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>>>-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>>>- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
>>>-- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
>>>-- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
>>>-- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
>>>
>>>Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
>>>of feature to 0.10.0.
>>>(https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
>>>
>>>Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
>>>so
>>
>>I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
>>>acceptable.
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>>2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil >>:
>>>
>>>
>>>+1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
>>>>-Kishor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz >>>>
>>
>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
>>>>release candidate was built from that tag.
>>>>
>>>>-Taylor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans 
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>+1
>>>>>I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote
>>>>>passes we need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the
>>>>correct
>>
>>release version in git.
>>>>
>>>>- Bobby
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz >>>>>
>>
>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
>>>>>
>>>>>Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
>>
>>
>>>>>The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will see a 
separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST upload API 
because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue in the 
announcement.

From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start planning for a 
0.10.1 release soon.

-Taylor

On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택  wrote:

> OK, I see your point.
> 
> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
> huge changeset.
> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
> vote.
> 
> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 
> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:
> 
>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>> 
>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 > wrote:
>> 
>>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>> multiple arguments.)
>>> 
>>> Here's my checklist.
>>> 
>>> - test passed : OK
>>> -- extract source tar
>>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
>>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>>> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
>>> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
>>> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
>>> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
>>> 
>>> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
>>> of feature to 0.10.0.
>>> (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
>>> 
>>> Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
>> so
>>> I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
>>> acceptable.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>> 
>>> 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil >> :
>>> 
 +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
 -Kishor
 
 
 
On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz > >
 wrote:
 
 
 The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
 release candidate was built from that tag.
 
 -Taylor
 
 
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans 
 wrote:
> 
> +1
> I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote
 passes we need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the
>> correct
 release version in git.
> - Bobby
> 
> 
> 
>  On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz > >
 wrote:
> 
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> 
 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> 
 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> 
 
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> 
 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor
> 
 
 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Name : 임 정택
>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
>>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
>>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[임정택]

OK, I see your point.

I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
huge changeset.
I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
vote.

I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
users don't meet strange behavior without information.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)


2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz님이 작성한 메시지:

> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>
> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>
> -Taylor
>
> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 > wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
> > (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
> > multiple arguments.)
> >
> > Here's my checklist.
> >
> > - test passed : OK
> > -- extract source tar
> > -- build via "mvn clean install”
> > - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
> > -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
> > - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
> > -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
> > -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
> > -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
> >
> > Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
> > of feature to 0.10.0.
> > (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
> >
> > Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
> so
> > I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
> > acceptable.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> >
> > 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil  >:
> >
> >> +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
> >> -Kishor
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
> >> release candidate was built from that tag.
> >>
> >> -Taylor
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>> I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote
> >> passes we need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the
> correct
> >> release version in git.
> >>> - Bobby
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
> >>>
> >>> Full list of changes in this release:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> >>>
> >>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> >>>
> >>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
> >>>
> >>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >>>
> >>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
> >>>
> >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> >>>
> >>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> >>> [ ]  0 No opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Taylor
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Name : 임 정택
> > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> > Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>
>

-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Harsha]

+1 for the release.

1) verified keys on all release artifacts.
2) verified deploying topologies in secure and non-secure cluster.

-- 
Harsha


On June 8, 2015 at 12:06:31 PM, Parth Brahmbhatt (pbrahmbh...@hortonworks.com) 
wrote:

+1. Agree about not blocking the release.  

‹ unit tests passed  
‹ word count and Exclamation topology executed successfully.  
‹ All UI actions work as expected.  
‹ Rolling upgrade works, Tested by rebuilding the same version and copying  
the new jar under storm/lib and bouncing all daemons.  
‹ Storm secure setup works, WordCount works as expected.  
‹ Could only test storm-jdbc connector with the sample test topology and  
it works.  

Thanks  
Parth  


On 6/8/15, 8:56 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz"  wrote:  

>In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many  
>features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we¹ve not leveraged it in any  
>way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don¹t think it should block the release.  
>  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Parth Brahmbhatt]

+1. Agree about not blocking the release.

‹ unit tests passed
‹ word count and Exclamation topology executed successfully.
‹ All UI actions work as expected.
‹ Rolling upgrade works, Tested by rebuilding the same version and copying
the new jar under storm/lib and bouncing all daemons.
‹ Storm secure setup works, WordCount works as expected.
‹ Could only test storm-jdbc connector with the sample test topology and
it works.

Thanks
Parth


On 6/8/15, 8:56 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz"  wrote:

>In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we¹ve not leveraged it in any
>way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don¹t think it should block the release.
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we can 
address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).

In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many 
features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any way 
yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.

-Taylor

On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택  wrote:

> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
> multiple arguments.)
> 
> Here's my checklist.
> 
> - test passed : OK
> -- extract source tar
> -- build via "mvn clean install”
> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
> 
> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
> of feature to 0.10.0.
> (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
> 
> Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0 so
> I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
> acceptable.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil :
> 
>> +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
>> -Kishor
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
>> release candidate was built from that tag.
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote
>> passes we need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the correct
>> release version in git.
>>> - Bobby
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
>>> 
>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
>>> 
>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
>>> 
>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
>>> 
>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>> 
>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
>>> 
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>>> 
>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Taylor
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[임정택]

Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
(Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
multiple arguments.)

Here's my checklist.

- test passed : OK
-- extract source tar
-- build via "mvn clean install”
- topology tests via storm-starter : OK
-- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
- test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
-- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
-- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
-- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853

Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
of feature to 0.10.0.
(https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)

Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0 so
I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
acceptable.

Thanks!
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil :

> +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
> -Kishor
>
>
>
>  On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
> wrote:
>
>
>  The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
> release candidate was built from that tag.
>
> -Taylor
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote
> passes we need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the correct
> release version in git.
> >  - Bobby
> >
> >
> >
> >On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Taylor
> >
>
>
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Kishorkumar Patil]

+1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
-Kishor
  


 On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
   

 The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The 
release candidate was built from that tag.

-Taylor


> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans  wrote:
> 
> +1
> I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote passes we 
> need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the correct release 
> version in git.
>  - Bobby
> 
> 
> 
>    On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
>wrote:
> 
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor
> 

  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The release 
candidate was built from that tag.

-Taylor


> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans  wrote:
> 
> +1
> I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote passes we 
> need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the correct release 
> version in git.
>  - Bobby
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[Bobby Evans]

+1
I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests.  Once the vote passes we 
need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the correct release 
version in git.
 - Bobby
 


 On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
wrote:
   

 This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor

  

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[P. Taylor Goetz]

Canceling this VOTE in order to pull additional patches into to the release 
candidate.

-Taylor

On Jun 3, 2015, at 11:53 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=2154048fd123a0960a4f5854ec4dd436bb775329
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=98bb958c1707c25f8344dd3941c51859b2691c2b;hb=e995febc2dc94e91d024137c12bb74d1c543d9b1
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1015/
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[P. Taylor Goetz]

That’s not a problem. I will cancel the current vote.

I pulled the fix for the storm-redis packaging into the release candidate, 
since it was strictly a packaging fix, not a code change.

So the remainder list for 0.10.0 is:

STORM-833 (replace logback with log4j2)
STORM-760 (use JSON for serialized conf)
STORM-848 (shade additional external dependencies)

The first two are ready for merge. We just need a review of STORM-848. I will 
review shortly.

-Taylor

On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:01 AM, Bobby Evans  wrote:

> Sorry to do this so late, but I actually have few things I really want to get 
> in, in addition to https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/574
> 
> Can we please pull in STORM-833.  It has all the +1s it needs, we just need 
> to merge it in.  It should be backwards compatible, but pulling it into a 
> major version change makes it more likely that if there are issues it will 
> not be that big of a deal.
> Additionally Kishor has been working on shading more jars and cleaning up the 
> dependencies a little bit, but waited too long to file a JIRA and put up a 
> pull request.  Again I would really like to see this go into 0.10.0, because 
> it pulls in all of the rolling upgrade changes.  The more things we can shade 
> the more likely it is that we will not need to break binary compatibility 
> going forward, but it is technically an incompatible change.  We should have 
> a pull request up in a few hours.
> 
> Similarly I would love to see STORM-760 go in.  It should really help in 
> doing rolling upgrades as well, although this is less critical, because it 
> really only is important for upgrading the version of clojure used.  I just 
> pushed a new version that resolved the merge conflicts.
> I understand if you don't want to wait for some/all of these though.
> 
> - Bobby
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 10:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=2154048fd123a0960a4f5854ec4dd436bb775329
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=98bb958c1707c25f8344dd3941c51859b2691c2b;hb=e995febc2dc94e91d024137c12bb74d1c543d9b1
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1015/
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Taylor
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[Kishorkumar Patil]

Sorry about the delay on this.But pull request [STORM-848] Shade external 
dependencies is up for review.

Regards,Kishor 


 On Thursday, June 4, 2015 9:01 AM, Bobby Evans 
 wrote:
   

 Sorry to do this so late, but I actually have few things I really want to get 
in, in addition to https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/574

Can we please pull in STORM-833.  It has all the +1s it needs, we just need to 
merge it in.  It should be backwards compatible, but pulling it into a major 
version change makes it more likely that if there are issues it will not be 
that big of a deal.
Additionally Kishor has been working on shading more jars and cleaning up the 
dependencies a little bit, but waited too long to file a JIRA and put up a pull 
request.  Again I would really like to see this go into 0.10.0, because it 
pulls in all of the rolling upgrade changes.  The more things we can shade the 
more likely it is that we will not need to break binary compatibility going 
forward, but it is technically an incompatible change.  We should have a pull 
request up in a few hours.

Similarly I would love to see STORM-760 go in.  It should really help in doing 
rolling upgrades as well, although this is less critical, because it really 
only is important for upgrading the version of clojure used.  I just pushed a 
new version that resolved the merge conflicts.
I understand if you don't want to wait for some/all of these though.

- Bobby
 


    On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 10:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
wrote:
  

 This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=2154048fd123a0960a4f5854ec4dd436bb775329

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=98bb958c1707c25f8344dd3941c51859b2691c2b;hb=e995febc2dc94e91d024137c12bb74d1c543d9b1

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1015/

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor



  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[Bobby Evans]

Sorry to do this so late, but I actually have few things I really want to get 
in, in addition to https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/574

Can we please pull in STORM-833.  It has all the +1s it needs, we just need to 
merge it in.  It should be backwards compatible, but pulling it into a major 
version change makes it more likely that if there are issues it will not be 
that big of a deal.
Additionally Kishor has been working on shading more jars and cleaning up the 
dependencies a little bit, but waited too long to file a JIRA and put up a pull 
request.  Again I would really like to see this go into 0.10.0, because it 
pulls in all of the rolling upgrade changes.  The more things we can shade the 
more likely it is that we will not need to break binary compatibility going 
forward, but it is technically an incompatible change.  We should have a pull 
request up in a few hours.

Similarly I would love to see STORM-760 go in.  It should really help in doing 
rolling upgrades as well, although this is less critical, because it really 
only is important for upgrading the version of clojure used.  I just pushed a 
new version that resolved the merge conflicts.
I understand if you don't want to wait for some/all of these though.

- Bobby
 


 On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 10:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
wrote:
   

 This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=2154048fd123a0960a4f5854ec4dd436bb775329

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=98bb958c1707c25f8344dd3941c51859b2691c2b;hb=e995febc2dc94e91d024137c12bb74d1c543d9b1

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1015/

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor

  

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

[P. Taylor Goetz]

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0.

Full list of changes in this release:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=2154048fd123a0960a4f5854ec4dd436bb775329

The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=98bb958c1707c25f8344dd3941c51859b2691c2b;hb=e995febc2dc94e91d024137c12bb74d1c543d9b1

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The Nexus staging repository for this release is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1015/

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0. 

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Taylor


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail