Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
2007/6/7, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) Ok, I change my vote to +1 to GA (non binding), since the call for struts-annotations vote has been done. Sorry for any incovenience this may cause :-) Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] General Availability (GA) I am using this build in 2 inhouse projects without problems. So I think it's time for going GA as well. cheers, Rainer -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Neupforte 16 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t:+49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
+1 Everything looks good to me and I've been running a 2.0.8 snapshot in production for a while without issues. Don On 6/8/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/7/07, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) No problem. (And apologies for misspelling your name!) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
Doh, that's +1 for GA On 6/10/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Everything looks good to me and I've been running a 2.0.8 snapshot in production for a while without issues. Don On 6/8/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/7/07, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) No problem. (And apologies for misspelling your name!) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
+1 for GA Looks great guys!!! -- James Mitchell On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote: The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8 Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/ Maven 2 staging repository: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/m2-staging-repository/ Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user list. As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing to help do the work -Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. In fact there isn't any release of Struts Annotations, how's that? Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
Struts annotations is a build time dependency. This was discussed before but I can't remember the final outcome. In any case, we could just release S2 annotations (hasn't changed in some time). musachy On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. In fact there isn't any release of Struts Annotations, how's that? Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone? Pink Floyd
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. In fact there isn't any release of Struts Annotations, how's that? It's staged here, but should probably have a separate vote as it wasn't mentioned in this one: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.2/ (Ranier mentioned this when he closed https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1943.) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
Antonio, as Musachy pointed out, the struts annotations are only a build time dependency. Regarding the release, I just called a vote for Struts Annotations 1.0.2. Rainer [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. in fact there isn't any release of Struts Annotations, how's that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) Rainer Am 07.06.2007 um 15:08 schrieb Wendy Smoak: On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. In fact there isn't any release of Struts Annotations, how's that? It's staged here, but should probably have a separate vote as it wasn't mentioned in this one: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.2/ (Ranier mentioned this when he closed https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1943.) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality
[X] General Availability (GA) Rainer Hermanns wrote: The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8 Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/ Maven 2 staging repository: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/m2-staging-repository/ Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user list. As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing to help do the work -Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
