Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
http://boxover.swazz.org/ Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: http://boxover.swazz.org/ Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is. I was curious and found this in their homepage: - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL. musachy On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://boxover.swazz.org/ > > Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is. I was curious and found this in their homepage: - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
You could ask if they'd be willing/able to change the license... On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL. musachy On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > http://boxover.swazz.org/ > > > > Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is. > > I was curious and found this in their homepage: > > - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license > > > GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used. > > Antonio > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
I will do that, on that same topic I have an old question , what licenses can we use? musachy On 3/16/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You could ask if they'd be willing/able to change the license... On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL. > > musachy > > On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > http://boxover.swazz.org/ > > > > > > Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is. > > > > I was curious and found this in their homepage: > > > > - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license > > > > > > GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used. > > > > Antonio > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
2007/3/16, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I will do that, on that same topic I have an old question , what licenses can we use? http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html HTH Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo plugin. We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have any recommendations? Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that be? Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external code bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book... -- Martin Cooper I'm looking at this one: http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/ which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed it is 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
imports on Tooltip.js:
dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove all
the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to do.
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> plugin.
> We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have any
> recommendations?
Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that
be?
Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external
code
bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
--
Martin Cooper
I'm looking at this one:
>
> http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
>
> which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed it
is
> 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
>
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
imports on Tooltip.js:
dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove all
the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to do.
OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That does
look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend trying
to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already provides.
--
Martin Cooper
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> > plugin.
> > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have
any
> > recommendations?
>
>
> Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
> profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that
> be?
> Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external
> code
> bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> I'm looking at this one:
> >
> > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> >
> > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed
it
> is
> > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> >
> > musachy
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo profile
online, quite cool:
http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are
the
> imports on Tooltip.js:
>
> dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
>
> ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove
all
> the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to
do.
OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That does
look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
trying
to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
provides.
--
Martin Cooper
musachy
>
> On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> > > plugin.
> > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have
> any
> > > recommendations?
> >
> >
> > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
> > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
that
> > be?
> > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
external
> > code
> > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> >
> > I'm looking at this one:
> > >
> > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > >
> > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed
> it
> > is
> > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > >
> > > musachy
> > > --
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status
On 3/12/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Otherwise, I can put it down for the 17th, and we can call it a St Paddy's day celebration :) I was looking at the wrong calendar when I said 17th. The time I have aside is on Monday the 19th, so if there's anything people would like to do over the weekend, please feel free. A couple of patches that I was afraid to apply were * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1706 * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796 They deals with restfulURLs and annotations, and I haven't been using those. If anyone is looking for something to do, a Zero-Configuration MailReader would make a world of difference right now. People still have Struts type-cast as an XML-dependent framework, which isn't going to change until we have a significant POC to trot out. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to join to the dev team?
Hi dudes, I would like to join to struts2 development team. How could I do that? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-join-to-the-dev-team--tf3416906.html#a9522720 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to join to the dev team?
On 3/16/07, Felipe Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi dudes, I would like to join to struts2 development team. How could I do that? http://struts.apache.org/helping.html -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anyone is looking for something to do, a > Zero-Configuration MailReader would make a world of > difference right now. I know I'm not a committer, but I have one more free weekend before a new gig starts and I was all set to volunteer... But then I started looking at it and I'm not sure how the interceptor bits would work--I don't see any annotations for defining interceptors. So I know this belongs on the user list, but I almost volunteered, so I'll be a dork and ask how that would be handled by a real developer. Dave Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status
In my opinion, you should avoid using custom interceptor stacks whenever possible. That way, you can simplify your configuration and make your application more consistent. If the mailreader always used the default stack, the zero configuration conversion would be trivial. Of course, another equally valid style is to use custom interceptor stacks on most every action/package, but it does make zero configuration adoption more difficult. Don On 3/16/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anyone is looking for something to do, a > Zero-Configuration MailReader would make a world of > difference right now. I know I'm not a committer, but I have one more free weekend before a new gig starts and I was all set to volunteer... But then I started looking at it and I'm not sure how the interceptor bits would work--I don't see any annotations for defining interceptors. So I know this belongs on the user list, but I almost volunteered, so I'll be a dork and ask how that would be handled by a real developer. Dave Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status
On 3/16/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In my opinion, you should avoid using custom interceptor stacks whenever possible. That way, you can simplify your configuration and make your application more consistent. If the mailreader always used the default stack, the zero configuration conversion would be trivial. Of course, another equally valid style is to use custom interceptor stacks on most every action/package, but it does make zero configuration adoption more difficult. Then modify it so it can use a default stack. Or, apply https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796 -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status
These too would be helpful. * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1560 * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1539 Or, as to the MailReader, a whole 'nother way to go would be to work it up from scratch as a zero-config, maybe with a HSQLDB backend using iBATIS or Cayenne. (since Hibernate is sadly LGPL). * http://strutsuniversity.org/Application+Use+Cases#ApplicationUseCases-MailReader Or, chuck the whole thing and do another Petstore :) -Ted. On 3/16/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anyone is looking for something to do, a > Zero-Configuration MailReader would make a world of > difference right now. I know I'm not a committer, but I have one more free weekend before a new gig starts and I was all set to volunteer... But then I started looking at it and I'm not sure how the interceptor bits would work--I don't see any annotations for defining interceptors. So I know this belongs on the user list, but I almost volunteered, so I'll be a dork and ask how that would be handled by a real developer. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
musachy
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo profile
online, quite cool:
http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are
> the
> > imports on Tooltip.js:
> >
> > dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> > dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> > dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> > dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> > dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> > dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> > dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> > dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> > dojo.require(" dojo.html.iframe");
> >
> > ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove
> all
> > the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to
> do.
>
>
> OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That
> does
> look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
> trying
> to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
> provides.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> musachy
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the
> dojo
> > > > plugin.
> > > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys
> have
> > any
> > > > recommendations?
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a
> custom
> > > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
> that
> > > be?
> > > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
> external
> > > code
> > > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my
> book...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm looking at this one:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > > >
> > > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine,
> compressed
> > it
> > > is
> > > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > > >
> > > > musachy
> > > > --
> > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
That's a pretty huge shrinkage, and seems reasonable to me. What do other
folks think?
--
Marin Cooper
musachy
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo
profile
> online, quite cool:
>
> http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
>
> musachy
>
> On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these
are
> > the
> > > imports on Tooltip.js:
> > >
> > > dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> > > dojo.require(" dojo.html.iframe");
> > >
> > > ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and
remove
> > all
> > > the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time
to
> > do.
> >
> >
> > OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That
> > does
> > look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
> > trying
> > to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
> > provides.
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> >
> > musachy
> > >
> > > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the
> > dojo
> > > > > plugin.
> > > > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys
> > have
> > > any
> > > > > recommendations?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a
> > custom
> > > > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
> > that
> > > > be?
> > > > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
> > external
> > > > code
> > > > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my
> > book...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking at this one:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > > > >
> > > > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine,
> > compressed
> > > it
> > > > is
> > > > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > > > >
> > > > > musachy
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
