Re: SLF4J dependency??
Including WS-Security stuff? On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 03:53, Ruwan Linton wrote: > Thanks for the analysis Andreas, I think we can safely get rid of the slf4j > ... I was running without that local with no issues. > > Thanks, > Ruwan > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Andreas Veithen > wrote: >> >> mvn dependency:tree reveals that SLF4J is a dependency of Rampart and >> the VFS transport. In the case of Rampart this is probably related to >> the introduction of OpenSAML2. In the case of the VFS transport, this >> dependency is somehow related to MINA and this is probably a left over >> from the split of the transports into separate modules. At least I >> don't see any of the default VFS providers that depend on MINA. >> Probably this dependency was introduced for the qpid transport and >> then moved from the root POM to synapse-transports and later to >> synapse-vfs-transport. >> >> Andreas >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:40, Ruwan Linton >> wrote: >> > Thanks Eirc, it seems like this dependency causes some issues for the >> > JDK-1.5 build. If that is qpid and mina both are not direct dependencies >> > of >> > synapse, I would remove the slf4j and let any one who wants the above >> > two >> > scenarios working add it with there own. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ruwan >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Hubert, Eric >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Ruwan, >> >> >> >> I think we already had this topic in April. ;-) At that time we >> >> identified >> >> qpid and mina, if I'm not wrong. Mina was only used by Quickfix/J... >> >> >> >> But here a mail I pulled of my mail archive: >> >> >> >> - Mail from Ruwan Sa 04.04.2009 14:26 --- >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Veithen >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:50, Ruwan Linton >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka >> >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I believe slf4j is required only for the FIX transport. It is a MINA >> >> >> dependency which is used by Quickfix/J. If it is not used by >> >> >> anything >> >> >> else >> >> >> we should remove this. >> >> > >> >> > Good point, Asankha, are we going to ship the QFJ jar files, I think >> >> > we >> >> > have >> >> > decided to remove these and document this under the fix transport >> >> > configuration for the user to put in these dependencies upon >> >> > configuring >> >> > it, >> >> > right?? >> >> >> >> >> >> This JAR only takes 9 KB. I would just leave it in the distribution. >> >> The advantage is that whenever a user adds a library that uses the >> >> SLF4J framework, logging will correctly work out of the box without >> >> the need for the user to understand the relationship between log4j, >> >> SLF4J and commons-logging. >> >> >> >> I am completely OK with keeping this, but not QuickFixJ and other >> >> related >> >> dependencies, because FIX is a domain specific transport which wont be >> >> required for many users. >> >> >> >> Ruwan >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Ruwan Linton [mailto:ruwan.lin...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:45 AM >> >> To: dev@synapse.apache.org >> >> Subject: SLF4J dependency?? >> >> >> >> Does any body know why we have slf4j libraries on the lib directory of >> >> the >> >> synapse distribution? That was the reason for the JDK1.5 failure of the >> >> build :-(, I just want to make sure there is no code using slf4j >> >> directly >> >> before getting rid of them :-) >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Ruwan Linton >> > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb >> > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org >> > email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 >> > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com >> > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@synapse.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@synapse.apache.org >> > > > > -- > Ruwan Linton > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@synapse.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@synapse.apache.org
Re: SLF4J dependency??
Thanks for the analysis Andreas, I think we can safely get rid of the slf4j ... I was running without that local with no issues. Thanks, Ruwan On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > mvn dependency:tree reveals that SLF4J is a dependency of Rampart and > the VFS transport. In the case of Rampart this is probably related to > the introduction of OpenSAML2. In the case of the VFS transport, this > dependency is somehow related to MINA and this is probably a left over > from the split of the transports into separate modules. At least I > don't see any of the default VFS providers that depend on MINA. > Probably this dependency was introduced for the qpid transport and > then moved from the root POM to synapse-transports and later to > synapse-vfs-transport. > > Andreas > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:40, Ruwan Linton > wrote: > > Thanks Eirc, it seems like this dependency causes some issues for the > > JDK-1.5 build. If that is qpid and mina both are not direct dependencies > of > > synapse, I would remove the slf4j and let any one who wants the above two > > scenarios working add it with there own. > > > > Thanks, > > Ruwan > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Hubert, Eric < > eric.hub...@foxmobile.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ruwan, > >> > >> I think we already had this topic in April. ;-) At that time we > identified > >> qpid and mina, if I'm not wrong. Mina was only used by Quickfix/J... > >> > >> But here a mail I pulled of my mail archive: > >> > >> - Mail from Ruwan Sa 04.04.2009 14:26 --- > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Veithen > >> wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:50, Ruwan Linton > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I believe slf4j is required only for the FIX transport. It is a MINA > >> >> dependency which is used by Quickfix/J. If it is not used by anything > >> >> else > >> >> we should remove this. > >> > > >> > Good point, Asankha, are we going to ship the QFJ jar files, I think > we > >> > have > >> > decided to remove these and document this under the fix transport > >> > configuration for the user to put in these dependencies upon > configuring > >> > it, > >> > right?? > >> > >> > >> This JAR only takes 9 KB. I would just leave it in the distribution. > >> The advantage is that whenever a user adds a library that uses the > >> SLF4J framework, logging will correctly work out of the box without > >> the need for the user to understand the relationship between log4j, > >> SLF4J and commons-logging. > >> > >> I am completely OK with keeping this, but not QuickFixJ and other > related > >> dependencies, because FIX is a domain specific transport which wont be > >> required for many users. > >> > >> Ruwan > >> > >> > >> From: Ruwan Linton [mailto:ruwan.lin...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:45 AM > >> To: dev@synapse.apache.org > >> Subject: SLF4J dependency?? > >> > >> Does any body know why we have slf4j libraries on the lib directory of > the > >> synapse distribution? That was the reason for the JDK1.5 failure of the > >> build :-(, I just want to make sure there is no code using slf4j > directly > >> before getting rid of them :-) > > > > > > > > -- > > Ruwan Linton > > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb > > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > > email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 > > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@synapse.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@synapse.apache.org > > -- Ruwan Linton Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
Re: SLF4J dependency??
mvn dependency:tree reveals that SLF4J is a dependency of Rampart and the VFS transport. In the case of Rampart this is probably related to the introduction of OpenSAML2. In the case of the VFS transport, this dependency is somehow related to MINA and this is probably a left over from the split of the transports into separate modules. At least I don't see any of the default VFS providers that depend on MINA. Probably this dependency was introduced for the qpid transport and then moved from the root POM to synapse-transports and later to synapse-vfs-transport. Andreas On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:40, Ruwan Linton wrote: > Thanks Eirc, it seems like this dependency causes some issues for the > JDK-1.5 build. If that is qpid and mina both are not direct dependencies of > synapse, I would remove the slf4j and let any one who wants the above two > scenarios working add it with there own. > > Thanks, > Ruwan > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Hubert, Eric > wrote: >> >> Hi Ruwan, >> >> I think we already had this topic in April. ;-) At that time we identified >> qpid and mina, if I'm not wrong. Mina was only used by Quickfix/J... >> >> But here a mail I pulled of my mail archive: >> >> - Mail from Ruwan Sa 04.04.2009 14:26 --- >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Veithen >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:50, Ruwan Linton wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I believe slf4j is required only for the FIX transport. It is a MINA >> >> dependency which is used by Quickfix/J. If it is not used by anything >> >> else >> >> we should remove this. >> > >> > Good point, Asankha, are we going to ship the QFJ jar files, I think we >> > have >> > decided to remove these and document this under the fix transport >> > configuration for the user to put in these dependencies upon configuring >> > it, >> > right?? >> >> >> This JAR only takes 9 KB. I would just leave it in the distribution. >> The advantage is that whenever a user adds a library that uses the >> SLF4J framework, logging will correctly work out of the box without >> the need for the user to understand the relationship between log4j, >> SLF4J and commons-logging. >> >> I am completely OK with keeping this, but not QuickFixJ and other related >> dependencies, because FIX is a domain specific transport which wont be >> required for many users. >> >> Ruwan >> >> >> From: Ruwan Linton [mailto:ruwan.lin...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:45 AM >> To: dev@synapse.apache.org >> Subject: SLF4J dependency?? >> >> Does any body know why we have slf4j libraries on the lib directory of the >> synapse distribution? That was the reason for the JDK1.5 failure of the >> build :-(, I just want to make sure there is no code using slf4j directly >> before getting rid of them :-) > > > > -- > Ruwan Linton > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@synapse.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@synapse.apache.org
Re: SLF4J dependency??
Thanks Eirc, it seems like this dependency causes some issues for the JDK-1.5 build. If that is qpid and mina both are not direct dependencies of synapse, I would remove the slf4j and let any one who wants the above two scenarios working add it with there own. Thanks, Ruwan On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Hubert, Eric wrote: > Hi Ruwan, > > I think we already had this topic in April. ;-) At that time we identified > qpid and mina, if I'm not wrong. Mina was only used by Quickfix/J... > > But here a mail I pulled of my mail archive: > > - Mail from Ruwan Sa 04.04.2009 14:26 --- > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Veithen > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:50, Ruwan Linton wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka < > hiranya...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I believe slf4j is required only for the FIX transport. It is a MINA > >> dependency which is used by Quickfix/J. If it is not used by anything > else > >> we should remove this. > > > > Good point, Asankha, are we going to ship the QFJ jar files, I think we > have > > decided to remove these and document this under the fix transport > > configuration for the user to put in these dependencies upon configuring > it, > > right?? > > > This JAR only takes 9 KB. I would just leave it in the distribution. > The advantage is that whenever a user adds a library that uses the > SLF4J framework, logging will correctly work out of the box without > the need for the user to understand the relationship between log4j, > SLF4J and commons-logging. > > I am completely OK with keeping this, but not QuickFixJ and other related > dependencies, because FIX is a domain specific transport which wont be > required for many users. > > Ruwan > > > From: Ruwan Linton [mailto:ruwan.lin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:45 AM > To: dev@synapse.apache.org > Subject: SLF4J dependency?? > > Does any body know why we have slf4j libraries on the lib directory of the > synapse distribution? That was the reason for the JDK1.5 failure of the > build :-(, I just want to make sure there is no code using slf4j directly > before getting rid of them :-) > -- Ruwan Linton Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
RE: SLF4J dependency??
Hi Ruwan, I think we already had this topic in April. ;-) At that time we identified qpid and mina, if I'm not wrong. Mina was only used by Quickfix/J... But here a mail I pulled of my mail archive: - Mail from Ruwan Sa 04.04.2009 14:26 --- On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:50, Ruwan Linton wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka > wrote: >> >> I believe slf4j is required only for the FIX transport. It is a MINA >> dependency which is used by Quickfix/J. If it is not used by anything else >> we should remove this. > > Good point, Asankha, are we going to ship the QFJ jar files, I think we have > decided to remove these and document this under the fix transport > configuration for the user to put in these dependencies upon configuring it, > right?? This JAR only takes 9 KB. I would just leave it in the distribution. The advantage is that whenever a user adds a library that uses the SLF4J framework, logging will correctly work out of the box without the need for the user to understand the relationship between log4j, SLF4J and commons-logging. I am completely OK with keeping this, but not QuickFixJ and other related dependencies, because FIX is a domain specific transport which wont be required for many users. Ruwan From: Ruwan Linton [mailto:ruwan.lin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:45 AM To: dev@synapse.apache.org Subject: SLF4J dependency?? Does any body know why we have slf4j libraries on the lib directory of the synapse distribution? That was the reason for the JDK1.5 failure of the build :-(, I just want to make sure there is no code using slf4j directly before getting rid of them :-)
