Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline

[Matthias Boehm]

After multiple runs of our perftest suite over 80MB-800GB with Spark 2.1
and 2.2, with and without codegen, as well as with and without compression,
we found and fixed quite a number of issues. However, there are a couple of
remaining performance issues with sparse maxpooling operations, so I would
recommend to defer the RC1 for a couple of days until these issues are
fixed as well.

Regards,
Matthias

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Krishna Kalyan <krishnakaly...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards,
> Krishna
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and
> > issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine
> > except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw,
> I
> > think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for
> additional
> > validation.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017
> > 06:51:44
> > > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1.
> > Thanks,
> > >
> > > From: "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.apache.org
> > > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM
> > > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Niketan.
> > >
> > > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
> > > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
> > > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
> > > would
> > > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot
> > for
> > > a
> > > > release candidate Dec 1?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline

[Krishna Kalyan]

+1

Regards,
Krishna

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and
> issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine
> except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw, I
> think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for additional
> validation.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Glenn
> >
> > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017
> 06:51:44
> > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1.
> Thanks,
> >
> > From: "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.apache.org
> > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Niketan.
> >
> > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
> > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
> > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
> > would
> > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot
> for
> > a
> > > release candidate Dec 1?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline

[Glenn Weidner]

+1

Regards,
Glenn



From:   "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com>
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Date:   11/08/2017 06:51 AM
Subject:    Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline




+1.

Thanks,

Niketan.

> On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
> generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
> upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
would
> be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot for
a
> release candidate Dec 1?
>
> Regards,
> Matthias

Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline

[Niketan Pansare]

+1.

Thanks,

Niketan.

> On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm 
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
> generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
> upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
would
> be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot for
a
> release candidate Dec 1?
>
> Regards,
> Matthias

SystemML 1.0 release timeline

[Matthias Boehm]

Hi all,

we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it would
be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot for a
release candidate Dec 1?

Regards,
Matthias

SystemML 1.0 release timeline

[Matthias Boehm]

Hi all,

we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it would
be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot for a
release candidate Dec 1?

Regards,
Matthias