date:20161018

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

2016-10-18 Thread Acs S

So far all issues Glen has seen based on running unit test cases using Spark 
1.6 are related to Test Case code itself, not base code. Probably we don't need 
to include that change at this hour for 0.11 unless there are any critical 
issues we need to get in.
-Arvind

  From: Niketan Pansare 
 To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 5:37 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)
   
Glenn: Would you prefer to have 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/269 in 0.11 release ?

Thanks,

Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar

Luciano Resende ---10/17/2016 09:06:30 PM---Please note the minor correction on 
the RC tag name (the actual tag hash is correct):

From: Luciano Resende 
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/17/2016 09:06 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)



Please note the minor correction on the RC tag name (the actual tag hash is
correct):

The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc3 (
1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3)


And off course, my +1


On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Luciano Resende 
wrote:

>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.11.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see
> http://systemml.apache.org/
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc1 (
> 1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3)
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/1baebfde40
> 0134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3
>
> The release artifacts can be found at :
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc3/
>
> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1009/
>
>
> =
> == Apache Incubator release policy ==
> =
> Please find below the guide to release management during incubation:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> ===
> == How can I help test this release? ==
> ===
> If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking an
> existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then
> reporting any regressions.
>
> 
> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
> 
> -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal
> related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs
> or regressions should not block this release.
>
>

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

2016-10-18 Thread dusenberrymw

+1 this is all great!

Yeah let's definitely get some JIRA issues and PRs started to incorporate new 
updates.

Also, I'd like to suggest that we construct some beginner examples and have 
everyone on here (& any others!) try them out. Anything that is difficult or 
confusing should be documented and analyzed for a possible improvement to the 
project.

Also, as for having projects and use-cases in personal GitHub accounts, one 
thing that's been done is to start in a personal account and then additionally 
propose adding it to the main project once it is relatively stable (perhaps as 
an example case).  The nice thing about this is having more exposure, 
especially for these types of (side) projects that use SystemML in a neat way.

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Oct 18, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Jeremy Anderson  
> wrote:
> 
> +1 all
> 
> ...
> 
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> 
> On 18 October 2016 at 11:25, Renee Mascarinas 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1  Thanks Madison!
>> 
>> I agree with everything.  As a designer, it's been really hard to
>> understand the value of SystemML without case studies.  There's so much
>> claims out there, but without real use cases, it's difficult to understand
>> and promote when there aren't tangible proof from existing users.
>> 
>> For visibility, I think it's a great idea to add SystemML as a skill on
>> LinkedIn and posting questions and answers on Stack Overflow. From our
>> research findings, the latter is a must for troubleshooting for data
>> scientist, second to Google.
>> 
>> Renee
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
>> jer...@objectadjective.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 Madison
>>> 
>>> I started started doing some user research with a few other designers.
>>> We're looking for patterns and pain points around adoption and use of
>>> SystemML. We'd love to share our findings so far to continue this
>>> discussion and get thoughts and feedback from everyone. I think clear
>>> tutorials and site architecture will help address some of the concerns
>>> we're hearing and could improve adoption. I love the idea of generating
>>> more articles and content on Stack Overflow. All of this would be really
>>> helpful in increasing awareness and building community.
>>> 
>>> We're synthesizing our research so far and we'll share it here. Thanks
>> for
>>> starting this thread!
>>> 
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Jeremy Anderson
>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6 October 2016 at 10:33, Madison Myers 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi all,
 
 Thought it may be a good idea to implement some measures on getting new
 users to adopt SystemML. At the moment, I feel there is a big learning
 curve and that we could make it easier through clearer tutorials and
 examples, a better user experience on the website (continuing the
>> process
 of making it better), more articles that explain SystemML at a high
>> level
 and how to use it/why it's important. I also think we should get more
 questions and answers on Stack Overflow so that overcoming issues is a
>>> bit
 easier for new users. Longer-term I'd also love to see a course taught
 online such as on Coursera as well as in university classrooms so that
 people in the field adopt SystemML more early-on.
 
 Also Deron and Mike had some interesting suggestions about visibility.
>>> They
 suggested having projects using SystemML on personal Github accounts as
 well as mentioning SystemML as a skill on LinkedIn.
 
 Would love to know if others agree and/or have suggestions.
 
 Thanks!
 
 --
 *Madison J. Myers*
 *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
 
 *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
 *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
 
   -
  LinkedIn 
 
>>> 
>>

Re: UX Research

2016-10-18 Thread dusenberrymw

This is awesome!  I really like the storyboards as they describe the types of 
scenarios in which SystemML would be really useful.  We should continue to work 
on making sure all of these are successful stories for the project.

The website layout analysis is great too -- we definitely need to get to the 
point where new users understand the project as quickly as possible.

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Madison Myers  wrote:
> 
> +1 Luciano
> 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
> 
>> Great guys !!! I think having the UX roadmap published is fine, and we
>> could just create a roadmap page where we have sections for development and
>> ux and fixing SYSTEMML-972 (particularly SYSTEMML-974) will make it much
>> simpler to add more contents to the website.
>> 
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-972
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-974
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
>> jer...@objectadjective.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Madison and Felix. To your point Felix, I think you're on the
>> nose.
>>> I am hoping actionable items for both design and dev will emerge from
>> user
>>> research. Ideally, I'd love to see a clear direction and roadmap for the
>>> future of SystemML begin to take shape. This thread is a great start, but
>>> it might also be helpful to start a UX roadmap wiki page. Who can I reach
>>> out to for access to publish to the wiki?
>>> 
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Jeremy Anderson
>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>> 
 On 17 October 2016 at 16:33,  wrote:
 
 Jeremy and others, thanks for the detailed presentation!
 The storyboards look great and it would be nice to see SystemML getting
>>> to
 a point where those scenarios just work!
 
 From the point of development I wonder how much is adding new features
 (that enhance user experience) versus making it more stable/reliable
>> and
 compiling/editing resources and documentation.
 It seems to me that what's currently missing are the easy entry points
 both in documentation and user interfaces (API's, notebooks, quickstart
 guides, ...) that are so perfectly depicted in those storyboards.
 
 I hope to see an outcome of actionable items for developers from this
>> UX
 research that we can manifest in concrete Jiras to work on.
 
 Felix
 
 
 
 
 Am 18.10.2016 00:39 schrieb Jeremy Anderson:
 
> Hi all,
> 
> I began working with a few designers on UX research for SystemML. We
> synthesized some of our early findings to share with everyone. From
>> some
> of
> the pain points that surfaced in our research, we began storyboarding
>>> user
> scenarios and look for ways we might be able to improve user
>> experience
> and
> increase adoption. I wanted to start a discussion around this UX and
> research. Here's a link to the research we've synthesized so. I'd love
> input/thoughts from everyone.
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2__Aw0kKn-uTWJ4S0ZvcHhhTE0/view
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> ...
> 
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Madison J. Myers*
> *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> 
> *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> 
>   -
>  LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

2016-10-18 Thread Niketan Pansare


Glenn: Would you prefer to have
https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/269 in 0.11 release ?

Thanks,

Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar



From:   Luciano Resende 
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date:   10/17/2016 09:06 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)



Please note the minor correction on the RC tag name (the actual tag hash is
correct):

The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc3 (
1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3)


And off course, my +1


On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Luciano Resende 
wrote:

>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.11.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see
> http://systemml.apache.org/
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc1 (
> 1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3)
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/1baebfde40
> 0134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3
>
> The release artifacts can be found at :
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc3/
>
> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1009/
>
>
> =
> == Apache Incubator release policy ==
> =
> Please find below the guide to release management during incubation:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> ===
> == How can I help test this release? ==
> ===
> If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking
an
> existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate,
then
> reporting any regressions.
>
> 
> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
> 
> -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal
> related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor
bugs
> or regressions should not block this release.
>
>

--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: SystemML design explorations

2016-10-18 Thread Jeremy Anderson

Thanks for sharing Renee! Fun, playful and shareable are all words that
capture our train of thought. The shareability aspect will speak to
adoption thread Madison started. A brand that engages people both at
conferences in the form of stickers, t-shirts etc, as well as online social
media, will help build and retain interest.

I'd love to see this develop a tone that may ease some of the technical
pain points users may encounter. I think personality can go a long way with
retaining adopters of new technology.

Cheers,

Jeremy

...

Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective

On 18 October 2016 at 16:54, Morgan Fritz  wrote:

> Hope you find this useful, we've been exploring a range of colors, styles,
> and layouts, and appreciate all of the input and inspiration we can get! We
> will continue to post our progress as we continue.
>
> Cheers,
> Morgan
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Renee Mascarinas <
> renee.uxdes...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> > Morgan, Jeremy, Rose, Rich, Dexter, Jason, and I are really excited about
> > SystemML so we took it upon ourselves to start exploring potential
> branding
> > directions.  Please find attached some of our explorations.  We’d love to
> > hear your input and feedback.
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Byr_YG_lhzZ3WDRJMGhoV2pRSEk
> >
> > Thanks everyone!
> > Renee
> >
>

Re: SystemML design explorations

2016-10-18 Thread Rose Peng

Thanks for sending this out Renee! Our design team put our heads together
to come up with concepts for simple and intuitive user flows as well as fun
visuals for the website. We're looking forward to hearing thoughts from the
rest of the community.

Rose

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Renee Mascarinas 
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> Morgan, Jeremy, Rose, Rich, Dexter, Jason, and I are really excited about
> SystemML so we took it upon ourselves to start exploring potential branding
> directions.  Please find attached some of our explorations.  We’d love to
> hear your input and feedback.
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Byr_YG_lhzZ3WDRJMGhoV2pRSEk
>
> Thanks everyone!
> Renee
>

-- 

*Rose Peng*
MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
(www.rosepeng.com)

Re: SystemML design explorations

2016-10-18 Thread Morgan Fritz

Hope you find this useful, we've been exploring a range of colors, styles,
and layouts, and appreciate all of the input and inspiration we can get! We
will continue to post our progress as we continue.

Cheers,
Morgan

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Renee Mascarinas 
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> Morgan, Jeremy, Rose, Rich, Dexter, Jason, and I are really excited about
> SystemML so we took it upon ourselves to start exploring potential branding
> directions.  Please find attached some of our explorations.  We’d love to
> hear your input and feedback.
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Byr_YG_lhzZ3WDRJMGhoV2pRSEk
>
> Thanks everyone!
> Renee
>

SystemML design explorations

2016-10-18 Thread Renee Mascarinas

Hello everyone,
Morgan, Jeremy, Rose, Rich, Dexter, Jason, and I are really excited about
SystemML so we took it upon ourselves to start exploring potential branding
directions.  Please find attached some of our explorations.  We’d love to
hear your input and feedback.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Byr_YG_lhzZ3WDRJMGhoV2pRSEk

Thanks everyone!
Renee

Contributing to SystemML, was Re: Building a community around SystemML

2016-10-18 Thread Luciano Resende

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Dhiren Navani 
wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I am Dhiren Navani. I am a graduate student in Computer Science at Arizona
> State University. I am trying to develop java and apache spark skills. I am
> interested in learning more about SystemML and would like to contribute. It
> would be great if there is someone who can mentor me or guide me to
> resources, since I am comparatively new to the opensource world and
> industry in general.
> Also I can assist with some promotional activities as I am a part of lot of
> meetup groups here in Phoenix, Arizona.
>
>

Hi Dhiren Navani

I noticed the thread went to multiple directions, so I want to make sure
you are getting the necessary help to get started with SystemML otherwise
please let us know and we can get a community mentor to work with you.

Thanks


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

2016-10-18 Thread Jeremy Anderson

+1 all

...

Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective

On 18 October 2016 at 11:25, Renee Mascarinas 
wrote:

> +1  Thanks Madison!
>
> I agree with everything.  As a designer, it's been really hard to
> understand the value of SystemML without case studies.  There's so much
> claims out there, but without real use cases, it's difficult to understand
> and promote when there aren't tangible proof from existing users.
>
> For visibility, I think it's a great idea to add SystemML as a skill on
> LinkedIn and posting questions and answers on Stack Overflow. From our
> research findings, the latter is a must for troubleshooting for data
> scientist, second to Google.
>
> Renee
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> jer...@objectadjective.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Madison
> >
> > I started started doing some user research with a few other designers.
> > We're looking for patterns and pain points around adoption and use of
> > SystemML. We'd love to share our findings so far to continue this
> > discussion and get thoughts and feedback from everyone. I think clear
> > tutorials and site architecture will help address some of the concerns
> > we're hearing and could improve adoption. I love the idea of generating
> > more articles and content on Stack Overflow. All of this would be really
> > helpful in increasing awareness and building community.
> >
> > We're synthesizing our research so far and we'll share it here. Thanks
> for
> > starting this thread!
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Jeremy Anderson
> > https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >
> >
> > On 6 October 2016 at 10:33, Madison Myers 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Thought it may be a good idea to implement some measures on getting new
> > > users to adopt SystemML. At the moment, I feel there is a big learning
> > > curve and that we could make it easier through clearer tutorials and
> > > examples, a better user experience on the website (continuing the
> process
> > > of making it better), more articles that explain SystemML at a high
> level
> > > and how to use it/why it's important. I also think we should get more
> > > questions and answers on Stack Overflow so that overcoming issues is a
> > bit
> > > easier for new users. Longer-term I'd also love to see a course taught
> > > online such as on Coursera as well as in university classrooms so that
> > > people in the field adopt SystemML more early-on.
> > >
> > > Also Deron and Mike had some interesting suggestions about visibility.
> > They
> > > suggested having projects using SystemML on personal Github accounts as
> > > well as mentioning SystemML as a skill on LinkedIn.
> > >
> > > Would love to know if others agree and/or have suggestions.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > >
> > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > >
> > >-
> > >   LinkedIn 
> > >
> >
>

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

2016-10-18 Thread Renee Mascarinas

+1  Thanks Madison!

I agree with everything.  As a designer, it's been really hard to
understand the value of SystemML without case studies.  There's so much
claims out there, but without real use cases, it's difficult to understand
and promote when there aren't tangible proof from existing users.

For visibility, I think it's a great idea to add SystemML as a skill on
LinkedIn and posting questions and answers on Stack Overflow. From our
research findings, the latter is a must for troubleshooting for data
scientist, second to Google.

Renee

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Anderson 
wrote:

> +1 Madison
>
> I started started doing some user research with a few other designers.
> We're looking for patterns and pain points around adoption and use of
> SystemML. We'd love to share our findings so far to continue this
> discussion and get thoughts and feedback from everyone. I think clear
> tutorials and site architecture will help address some of the concerns
> we're hearing and could improve adoption. I love the idea of generating
> more articles and content on Stack Overflow. All of this would be really
> helpful in increasing awareness and building community.
>
> We're synthesizing our research so far and we'll share it here. Thanks for
> starting this thread!
>
> Jeremy
>
> ...
>
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>
>
> On 6 October 2016 at 10:33, Madison Myers  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thought it may be a good idea to implement some measures on getting new
> > users to adopt SystemML. At the moment, I feel there is a big learning
> > curve and that we could make it easier through clearer tutorials and
> > examples, a better user experience on the website (continuing the process
> > of making it better), more articles that explain SystemML at a high level
> > and how to use it/why it's important. I also think we should get more
> > questions and answers on Stack Overflow so that overcoming issues is a
> bit
> > easier for new users. Longer-term I'd also love to see a course taught
> > online such as on Coursera as well as in university classrooms so that
> > people in the field adopt SystemML more early-on.
> >
> > Also Deron and Mike had some interesting suggestions about visibility.
> They
> > suggested having projects using SystemML on personal Github accounts as
> > well as mentioning SystemML as a skill on LinkedIn.
> >
> > Would love to know if others agree and/or have suggestions.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > *Madison J. Myers*
> > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> >
> > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> >
> >-
> >   LinkedIn 
> >
>

Re: UX Research

2016-10-18 Thread Madison Myers

+1 Luciano

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Luciano Resende 
wrote:

> Great guys !!! I think having the UX roadmap published is fine, and we
> could just create a roadmap page where we have sections for development and
> ux and fixing SYSTEMML-972 (particularly SYSTEMML-974) will make it much
> simpler to add more contents to the website.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-972
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-974
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> jer...@objectadjective.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Thanks Madison and Felix. To your point Felix, I think you're on the
> nose.
> > I am hoping actionable items for both design and dev will emerge from
> user
> > research. Ideally, I'd love to see a clear direction and roadmap for the
> > future of SystemML begin to take shape. This thread is a great start, but
> > it might also be helpful to start a UX roadmap wiki page. Who can I reach
> > out to for access to publish to the wiki?
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Jeremy Anderson
> > https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >
> > On 17 October 2016 at 16:33,  wrote:
> >
> > > Jeremy and others, thanks for the detailed presentation!
> > > The storyboards look great and it would be nice to see SystemML getting
> > to
> > > a point where those scenarios just work!
> > >
> > > From the point of development I wonder how much is adding new features
> > > (that enhance user experience) versus making it more stable/reliable
> and
> > > compiling/editing resources and documentation.
> > > It seems to me that what's currently missing are the easy entry points
> > > both in documentation and user interfaces (API's, notebooks, quickstart
> > > guides, ...) that are so perfectly depicted in those storyboards.
> > >
> > > I hope to see an outcome of actionable items for developers from this
> UX
> > > research that we can manifest in concrete Jiras to work on.
> > >
> > > Felix
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 18.10.2016 00:39 schrieb Jeremy Anderson:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I began working with a few designers on UX research for SystemML. We
> > >> synthesized some of our early findings to share with everyone. From
> some
> > >> of
> > >> the pain points that surfaced in our research, we began storyboarding
> > user
> > >> scenarios and look for ways we might be able to improve user
> experience
> > >> and
> > >> increase adoption. I wanted to start a discussion around this UX and
> > >> research. Here's a link to the research we've synthesized so. I'd love
> > >> input/thoughts from everyone.
> > >>
> > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2__Aw0kKn-uTWJ4S0ZvcHhhTE0/view
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy Anderson
> > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
*Madison J. Myers*
*UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*

*King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
*New York University, BA Political Science '12*

   -
  LinkedIn

Re: UX Research

2016-10-18 Thread Luciano Resende

Great guys !!! I think having the UX roadmap published is fine, and we
could just create a roadmap page where we have sections for development and
ux and fixing SYSTEMML-972 (particularly SYSTEMML-974) will make it much
simpler to add more contents to the website.


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-972
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-974

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Jeremy Anderson  wrote:

> Thanks Madison and Felix. To your point Felix, I think you're on the nose.
> I am hoping actionable items for both design and dev will emerge from user
> research. Ideally, I'd love to see a clear direction and roadmap for the
> future of SystemML begin to take shape. This thread is a great start, but
> it might also be helpful to start a UX roadmap wiki page. Who can I reach
> out to for access to publish to the wiki?
>
> Jeremy
>
> ...
>
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>
> On 17 October 2016 at 16:33,  wrote:
>
> > Jeremy and others, thanks for the detailed presentation!
> > The storyboards look great and it would be nice to see SystemML getting
> to
> > a point where those scenarios just work!
> >
> > From the point of development I wonder how much is adding new features
> > (that enhance user experience) versus making it more stable/reliable and
> > compiling/editing resources and documentation.
> > It seems to me that what's currently missing are the easy entry points
> > both in documentation and user interfaces (API's, notebooks, quickstart
> > guides, ...) that are so perfectly depicted in those storyboards.
> >
> > I hope to see an outcome of actionable items for developers from this UX
> > research that we can manifest in concrete Jiras to work on.
> >
> > Felix
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 18.10.2016 00:39 schrieb Jeremy Anderson:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I began working with a few designers on UX research for SystemML. We
> >> synthesized some of our early findings to share with everyone. From some
> >> of
> >> the pain points that surfaced in our research, we began storyboarding
> user
> >> scenarios and look for ways we might be able to improve user experience
> >> and
> >> increase adoption. I wanted to start a discussion around this UX and
> >> research. Here's a link to the research we've synthesized so. I'd love
> >> input/thoughts from everyone.
> >>
> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2__Aw0kKn-uTWJ4S0ZvcHhhTE0/view
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Jeremy
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Jeremy Anderson
> >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

Re: UX Research

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

Re: SystemML design explorations

Re: SystemML design explorations

Re: SystemML design explorations

SystemML design explorations

Contributing to SystemML, was Re: Building a community around SystemML

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

Re: UX Research

Re: UX Research

13 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information