[GitHub] thrift issue #1313: THRIFT-4251 Fix JDK Epoll Bug in Thrift of TThreadedSele...

2017-08-13 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
There are conflicting reports to what the root cause of this issue really 
is.  I found:

http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6693490 fixed in Java 7b55
http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6897993 possibly caused by above, 
fixed in Java 7b77
http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6670302 bug in linux 2.4 kernel 
fixed in 2.6

Given you reproduced it under Java 8b131 then it sounds like it would be a 
different issue to what's already been reported, or a regression in one of 
them.  Folks seem to think this issue was resolved.  I actually found a number 
of projects that implemented their own solution, but they were all slightly 
different.

Have you looked into reopening 6670302 with a sample program that recreates 
it under Java 8b131?   Or, does the sample app used in that defect reproduce on 
your system possibly?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4251) Epoll Selector Bug

2017-08-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124912#comment-16124912
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-4251:


Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
There are conflicting reports to what the root cause of this issue really 
is.  I found:

http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6693490 fixed in Java 7b55
http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6897993 possibly caused by above, 
fixed in Java 7b77
http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6670302 bug in linux 2.4 kernel 
fixed in 2.6

Given you reproduced it under Java 8b131 then it sounds like it would be a 
different issue to what's already been reported, or a regression in one of 
them.  Folks seem to think this issue was resolved.  I actually found a number 
of projects that implemented their own solution, but they were all slightly 
different.

Have you looked into reopening 6670302 with a sample program that recreates 
it under Java 8b131?   Or, does the sample app used in that defect reproduce on 
your system possibly?



> Epoll Selector Bug
> --
>
> Key: THRIFT-4251
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Java - Compiler, Java - Library
>Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Environment: Linux version 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 
> (buil...@kbuilder.dev.centos.org)
> java version "1.8.0_131"
>Reporter: JohnnyLiao
>  Labels: epoll, jdk, selector
>
> Thrift java unsolve the infamous epoll bug. It's consum 100% cpu resource 
> when this occured. It seems to affect any NIO based Java server applications 
> running in the specified environment. Some projects provide workarounds for 
> similar JDK bugs, for example replaces the current Selector of this 
> SelectorThread.select with newly created Selector.
> Stack Trace:
> "Thread-46" #95 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x7fc79cd02800 nid=0xb1 runnable 
> [0x7fc580bd1000]
>java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:269)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:93)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86)
> - locked <0x8012f748> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$3)
> - locked <0x8012f738> (a 
> java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet)
> - locked <0x80120f58> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.select(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:570)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.run(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:541)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4252) Cannot shutdown Java server when clients are still connected

2017-08-13 Thread Mario Emmenlauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124948#comment-16124948
 ] 

Mario Emmenlauer commented on THRIFT-4252:
--

I have the same problem also with the Java thread pool server, so it seems this 
is an expected behavior of the Java servers. However, since this has been fixed 
for the C++ servers, I think it would be sensible to also fix the issue for the 
Java servers.

With the current behavior, a malicious client can basically prohibit clean 
server shutdown (and all it needs to do is keep the connection open). More 
realisticly, the client does not need to be malicious, it could just hang or 
forget to disconnect and thereby "locking" the server in an open API connection.

> Cannot shutdown Java server when clients are still connected
> 
>
> Key: THRIFT-4252
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4252
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Java - Library
>Affects Versions: 0.10.0
>Reporter: Mario Emmenlauer
>
> I found issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2441 and I believe 
> that the same problem still exists in the Java servers, and I'm affected by 
> it. Short summary: I can not shut down the Java server (neither TSimpleServer 
> nor TThreadedServer) while clients are still connected. That is pretty bad, 
> because essentially the clients are not under by control, but they can 
> essentially "block" server maintenance operations by blocking the shutdown.
> *In more detail:* I have a Java TSimpleServer runnable in a thread running. 
> The main thread eventually asks the server to stop(). But they seem to ignore 
> the request. I checked the code of TSimpleServer.java and I'm under the 
> impression that the innermost loop the server does not poll the variable 
> stopped_ or does it? Looking at 
> https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/master/lib/java/src/org/apache/thrift/server/TSimpleServer.java
>  from line 76:
> {code}
>   while (true) {
> if (eventHandler_ != null) {
>   eventHandler_.processContext(connectionContext, inputTransport, 
> outputTransport);
> }
> if(!processor.process(inputProtocol, outputProtocol)) {
>   break;
> }
>   }
> {code}
> I found that this loop is only interrupted if the client disconnects. I tried 
> changing {{while(true)}} for {{while(!stopped_)}} but that did not help. I 
> guess that one of the methods in the loop must be blocking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (THRIFT-4285) Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised

2017-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister (JIRA)
Chris Bannister created THRIFT-4285:
---

 Summary: Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour 
to be customised
 Key: THRIFT-4285
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285
 Project: Thrift
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Go - Compiler, Go - Library
Reporter: Chris Bannister
Assignee: Chris Bannister


Currently it is difficult to change how thrift writes messages onto the 
transport because they are in the generated code. Instead the generated 
send/recv methods should be in the library. This will greatly simplify the 
client code and remove many duplicate methods whilst allowing users more 
flexibility to implement connection pools and other features such as THeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (THRIFT-4285) Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised

2017-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Bannister updated THRIFT-4285:

Attachment: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib.patch

> Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised
> -
>
> Key: THRIFT-4285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Go - Compiler, Go - Library
>Reporter: Chris Bannister
>Assignee: Chris Bannister
> Attachments: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib.patch
>
>
> Currently it is difficult to change how thrift writes messages onto the 
> transport because they are in the generated code. Instead the generated 
> send/recv methods should be in the library. This will greatly simplify the 
> client code and remove many duplicate methods whilst allowing users more 
> flexibility to implement connection pools and other features such as THeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4285) Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised

2017-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124955#comment-16124955
 ] 

Chris Bannister commented on THRIFT-4285:
-

This is a breaking change for the generated code as the methods 
NewXXXClientFactory no long exist, instead the NewXXXClient takes a TClient 
which can be customised with different protocol/transport options.

> Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised
> -
>
> Key: THRIFT-4285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Go - Compiler, Go - Library
>Reporter: Chris Bannister
>Assignee: Chris Bannister
> Attachments: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib.patch
>
>
> Currently it is difficult to change how thrift writes messages onto the 
> transport because they are in the generated code. Instead the generated 
> send/recv methods should be in the library. This will greatly simplify the 
> client code and remove many duplicate methods whilst allowing users more 
> flexibility to implement connection pools and other features such as THeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[GitHub] thrift issue #1313: THRIFT-4251 Fix JDK Epoll Bug in Thrift of TThreadedSele...

2017-08-13 Thread Johnny-Liao
Github user Johnny-Liao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
I found a report maybe more relevant with this issue. 
See : 
[http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6403933](http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6403933)
It gives a solution what is creates a new Selector to replace the old one.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4251) Epoll Selector Bug

2017-08-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124969#comment-16124969
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-4251:


Github user Johnny-Liao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
I found a report maybe more relevant with this issue. 
See : 
[http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6403933](http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6403933)
It gives a solution what is creates a new Selector to replace the old one.


> Epoll Selector Bug
> --
>
> Key: THRIFT-4251
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Java - Compiler, Java - Library
>Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Environment: Linux version 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 
> (buil...@kbuilder.dev.centos.org)
> java version "1.8.0_131"
>Reporter: JohnnyLiao
>  Labels: epoll, jdk, selector
>
> Thrift java unsolve the infamous epoll bug. It's consum 100% cpu resource 
> when this occured. It seems to affect any NIO based Java server applications 
> running in the specified environment. Some projects provide workarounds for 
> similar JDK bugs, for example replaces the current Selector of this 
> SelectorThread.select with newly created Selector.
> Stack Trace:
> "Thread-46" #95 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x7fc79cd02800 nid=0xb1 runnable 
> [0x7fc580bd1000]
>java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:269)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:93)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86)
> - locked <0x8012f748> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$3)
> - locked <0x8012f738> (a 
> java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet)
> - locked <0x80120f58> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.select(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:570)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.run(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:541)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4285) Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised

2017-08-13 Thread Can Celasun (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124973#comment-16124973
 ] 

Can Celasun commented on THRIFT-4285:
-

I didn't have a chance to review the patch yet, but I really like the idea. 
Generated clients contain a lot of cruft that don't need to be there and 
getting rid of that and adding flexibilty in the process might be worth a BC 
break (though it might be too late for 0.11).

I'll have more feedback after reviewing the patch and making sure all tests are 
passing.

> Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised
> -
>
> Key: THRIFT-4285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Go - Compiler, Go - Library
>Reporter: Chris Bannister
>Assignee: Chris Bannister
> Attachments: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib.patch
>
>
> Currently it is difficult to change how thrift writes messages onto the 
> transport because they are in the generated code. Instead the generated 
> send/recv methods should be in the library. This will greatly simplify the 
> client code and remove many duplicate methods whilst allowing users more 
> flexibility to implement connection pools and other features such as THeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4285) Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised

2017-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124980#comment-16124980
 ] 

Chris Bannister commented on THRIFT-4285:
-

Something I just noticed, no need to define ArgWriter/ResultReader as they 
should just be TStructs

> Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised
> -
>
> Key: THRIFT-4285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Go - Compiler, Go - Library
>Reporter: Chris Bannister
>Assignee: Chris Bannister
> Attachments: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib.patch
>
>
> Currently it is difficult to change how thrift writes messages onto the 
> transport because they are in the generated code. Instead the generated 
> send/recv methods should be in the library. This will greatly simplify the 
> client code and remove many duplicate methods whilst allowing users more 
> flexibility to implement connection pools and other features such as THeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (THRIFT-4285) Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised

2017-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Bannister updated THRIFT-4285:

Attachment: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib-2.patch

removed unnecessary interfaces

> Pull generated send/recv into library to allow behaviour to be customised
> -
>
> Key: THRIFT-4285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4285
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Go - Compiler, Go - Library
>Reporter: Chris Bannister
>Assignee: Chris Bannister
> Attachments: 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib-2.patch, 
> 0001-go-pull-generated-send-recv-into-lib.patch
>
>
> Currently it is difficult to change how thrift writes messages onto the 
> transport because they are in the generated code. Instead the generated 
> send/recv methods should be in the library. This will greatly simplify the 
> client code and remove many duplicate methods whilst allowing users more 
> flexibility to implement connection pools and other features such as THeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[GitHub] thrift issue #1313: THRIFT-4251 Fix JDK Epoll Bug in Thrift of TThreadedSele...

2017-08-13 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
However, as with all the other issues, they were already resolved, so the 
fact you are still seeing this with a recent kernel and java version means 
there's still a bug that needs to be fixed somewhere.  There shouldn't be a 
workaround in every Java program that uses a Selector().  I would still 
encourage you to come up with a simple example that demonstrates it without 
Thrift involved and report it upstream.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4251) Epoll Selector Bug

2017-08-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16125040#comment-16125040
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-4251:


Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
However, as with all the other issues, they were already resolved, so the 
fact you are still seeing this with a recent kernel and java version means 
there's still a bug that needs to be fixed somewhere.  There shouldn't be a 
workaround in every Java program that uses a Selector().  I would still 
encourage you to come up with a simple example that demonstrates it without 
Thrift involved and report it upstream.


> Epoll Selector Bug
> --
>
> Key: THRIFT-4251
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Java - Compiler, Java - Library
>Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Environment: Linux version 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 
> (buil...@kbuilder.dev.centos.org)
> java version "1.8.0_131"
>Reporter: JohnnyLiao
>  Labels: epoll, jdk, selector
>
> Thrift java unsolve the infamous epoll bug. It's consum 100% cpu resource 
> when this occured. It seems to affect any NIO based Java server applications 
> running in the specified environment. Some projects provide workarounds for 
> similar JDK bugs, for example replaces the current Selector of this 
> SelectorThread.select with newly created Selector.
> Stack Trace:
> "Thread-46" #95 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x7fc79cd02800 nid=0xb1 runnable 
> [0x7fc580bd1000]
>java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:269)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:93)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86)
> - locked <0x8012f748> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$3)
> - locked <0x8012f738> (a 
> java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet)
> - locked <0x80120f58> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.select(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:570)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.run(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:541)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[GitHub] thrift issue #1313: THRIFT-4251 Fix JDK Epoll Bug in Thrift of TThreadedSele...

2017-08-13 Thread Johnny-Liao
Github user Johnny-Liao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
It's not elegant way to rebuild Selector in every Java program, but it's a 
effective way to fix this bug.  And so many year passed it not really fixed in 
JDK or kernel. This is one reason for some Frameworks implemented this 
solution.  After all, the consequences of this bug are too serious.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-4251) Epoll Selector Bug

2017-08-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16125165#comment-16125165
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-4251:


Github user Johnny-Liao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1313
  
It's not elegant way to rebuild Selector in every Java program, but it's a 
effective way to fix this bug.  And so many year passed it not really fixed in 
JDK or kernel. This is one reason for some Frameworks implemented this 
solution.  After all, the consequences of this bug are too serious.


> Epoll Selector Bug
> --
>
> Key: THRIFT-4251
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4251
> Project: Thrift
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Java - Compiler, Java - Library
>Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Environment: Linux version 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 
> (buil...@kbuilder.dev.centos.org)
> java version "1.8.0_131"
>Reporter: JohnnyLiao
>  Labels: epoll, jdk, selector
>
> Thrift java unsolve the infamous epoll bug. It's consum 100% cpu resource 
> when this occured. It seems to affect any NIO based Java server applications 
> running in the specified environment. Some projects provide workarounds for 
> similar JDK bugs, for example replaces the current Selector of this 
> SelectorThread.select with newly created Selector.
> Stack Trace:
> "Thread-46" #95 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x7fc79cd02800 nid=0xb1 runnable 
> [0x7fc580bd1000]
>java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:269)
> at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:93)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86)
> - locked <0x8012f748> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$3)
> - locked <0x8012f738> (a 
> java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet)
> - locked <0x80120f58> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)
> at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.select(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:570)
> at 
> org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadedSelectorServer$SelectorThread.run(TThreadedSelectorServer.java:541)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)