Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db, so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) ) Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content of Thumbs.db files (was RE: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16)
I think that it is safe to ship the thumbs.db inside the archives. Thumbs.db is the image thumbnail database generated by Windows Explorer when you display images in Explorer. So it will only deliver information about the images in the directory where it sits. You can use http://www.dmthumbs.com/ to have a look inside the file to verify it ... Best regards, Christophe -Message d'origine- De : Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 5 février 2008 17:57 À : Tomcat Developers List Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16 Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db, so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) ) Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, ... snip / As far as our voting goes, the only thing that matters is the source release. We are free to re-package the binaries as much, or as little, as we wish providing we don't modify the build script since that would be modifying the source. Personally, I would repackage it but I am not that bothered about it. I am happy which ever way Remy chooses to go on this. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
On Feb 5, 2008 6:56 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, ... snip / As far as our voting goes, the only thing that matters is the source release. This IMO is a distortion of ASF policy - which I believe is that every release needs the source - the binaries are a nice convenience - but you've extrapolated that into something different. If those convenience binaries are provided as part of an official release then they do need PMC approval: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what Niall We are free to re-package the binaries as much, or as little, as we wish providing we don't modify the build script since that would be modifying the source. Personally, I would repackage it but I am not that bothered about it. I am happy which ever way Remy chooses to go on this. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. no need, I'd just release the darn thing. the file doesn't contain anything except for a thumb cache of the host manager files. no one cares Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:57 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db, so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) ) Ok, I think I will keep the current binaries. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 6:56 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue. Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, ... snip / As far as our voting goes, the only thing that matters is the source release. This IMO is a distortion of ASF policy - which I believe is that every release needs the source - the binaries are a nice convenience - but you've extrapolated that into something different. If those convenience binaries are provided as part of an official release then they do need PMC approval: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what Niall I'd say we take the release discussion away from the release, just release it with the file, as is, and in the next release, we take the file out. if we wanna debate ASF ways, lets do that, but not hinder this release. Filip We are free to re-package the binaries as much, or as little, as we wish providing we don't modify the build script since that would be modifying the source. Personally, I would repackage it but I am not that bothered about it. I am happy which ever way Remy chooses to go on this. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future releases. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Am 30.01.2008 um 15:21 schrieb Remy Maucherat: According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ x] Stable Peter
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:21 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Ok, the voting seems wrapped up at this point. Any second thoughts ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Can't vote before Sunday evening, but no need to wait for that. Rainer Remy Maucherat schrieb: Ok, the voting seems wrapped up at this point. Any second thoughts ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 00:14 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: Can't vote before Sunday evening, but no need to wait for that. I'll wait at least until monday. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I currently see a small number TCK failures. As this is the first time I have run the TCK it may well be my configuration that is wrong. I am looking into the errors at the moment. Out of curiosity, has anyone got the signature tests working? I seem to be missing some required classes. Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable I currently see a small number TCK failures. As this is the first time I have run the TCK it may well be my configuration that is wrong. I am looking into the errors at the moment. It is amazing what adding -Dorg.apache.catalina.STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE=true can do ;) The tests all pass bar the signature one that I can't get the class to compile for. Any hints or tips appreciated. I don't have any heavy usage of 6.0.x at the moment but I couldn't break anything just poking around with the app I do have running at home. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable I currently see a small number TCK failures. As this is the first time I have run the TCK it may well be my configuration that is wrong. I am looking into the errors at the moment. It is amazing what adding -Dorg.apache.catalina.STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE=true can do ;) The tests all pass bar the signature one that I can't get the class to compile for. Any hints or tips appreciated. I don't have any heavy usage of 6.0.x at the moment but I couldn't break anything just poking around with the app I do have running at home. I haven't got the signature test to pass, but I haven't invested too much time in it, since its not functionality Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] Stable Regards, Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
