Re: Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Oh

So it is not a tool but a process. I see. Sounds very tempting to be honest
bit also think we should wait "after summer" to not change all at once.

What do you think?

Le 5 juil. 2017 02:21, "John D. Ament"  a écrit :

> Romain,
>
> For the site generation, if you want to switch to gitwcsub (and dump the
> SVN repo) its simply a matter of having a job (buildbot or jenkins) that
> will build the commit and push the result to a special branch (most are
> using asf-site).  Since you're already using mvn to generate the site, I
> think all you'd have to do is specify the new repo + branch name.
>
> John
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
>
> > Ok submitted
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-generator.git,
> >
> > @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except it
> > is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated
> > folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to
> our
> > generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;)
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
> > 2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> >
> > > Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/
> if
> > > you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
> > > instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask
> it
> > -
> > > it
> > > > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
> > > > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it
> is
> > a
> > > > concern at any level.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > > >  | Old Blog
> > > >  | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> > > > :
> > > >
> > > > > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > > > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to
> > > date.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <
> > > daniels...@apache.org>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> > > > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last
> > > Jean-Louis's
> > > > > >> merge.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a
> stage
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > +1 for that.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > > > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > +1
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github
> but
> > > it
> > > > > >> looks
> > > > > >> > > hard,
> > > > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Anyone against it?
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
> > > > > equivalent)
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > > > have a github proxy.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we
> copy
> > > the
> > > > > >> output
> > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub
> maven
> > > > > plugin.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > >> > > > @rmannib

Re: Site NG on github

[John D. Ament]

Romain,

For the site generation, if you want to switch to gitwcsub (and dump the
SVN repo) its simply a matter of having a job (buildbot or jenkins) that
will build the commit and push the result to a special branch (most are
using asf-site).  Since you're already using mvn to generate the site, I
think all you'd have to do is specify the new repo + branch name.

John


On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Ok submitted
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-generator.git,
>
> @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except it
> is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated
> folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to our
> generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>
> > Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if
> > you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
> > instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it
> -
> > it
> > > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
> > > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is
> a
> > > concern at any level.
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Old Blog
> > >  | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > > 
> > >
> > > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> > > :
> > >
> > > > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to
> > date.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <
> > daniels...@apache.org>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> > > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last
> > Jean-Louis's
> > > > >> merge.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > +1 for that.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > +1
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > Hi guys,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but
> > it
> > > > >> looks
> > > > >> > > hard,
> > > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Anyone against it?
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
> > > > equivalent)
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > > have a github proxy.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy
> > the
> > > > >> output
> > > > >> > > to
> > > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven
> > > > plugin.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > > > >> > > >  | Old Blog
> > > > >> > > >  | Github <
> > > https://github.com/
> > > > >> > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > >> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE
> > > > Factory
> > > > >> > > > 
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > Daniel Cunha
> > > > >> > https://t

Re: Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

should have all the needed content now,

mvn compile to generate the site
mvn pre-site to publish it on staging


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory


2017-07-04 19:30 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> *typo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-site-generator.git
> is the right one
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2017-07-04 18:33 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
>> imported the generator in https://git-wip-us.apache.o
>> rg/repos/asf?p=tomee-tomee-site-generator.git, will push a warning in
>> the svn project for now and we can delete it later
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Old Blog
>>  | Github
>>  | LinkedIn
>>  | JavaEE Factory
>> 
>>
>> 2017-07-04 18:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>>
>>> Ok submitted https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>> repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-generator.git,
>>>
>>> @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except
>>> it is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated
>>> folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to our
>>> generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>>  | Old Blog
>>>  | Github
>>>  | LinkedIn
>>>  | JavaEE Factory
>>> 
>>>
>>> 2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>>>
 Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/
 if
 you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
 instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.

 John

 On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
 rmannibu...@gmail.com>
 wrote:

 > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask
 it - it
 > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
 > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it
 is a
 > concern at any level.
 >
 >
 > Romain Manni-Bucau
 > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
 >  | Old Blog
 >  | Github <
 > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
 > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
 > 
 >
 > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
 > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
 > :
 >
 > > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
 > >
 > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
 > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > > +1
 > > >
 > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
 > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
 > > > wrote:
 > > >
 > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to
 date.
 > > >>
 > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <
 daniels...@apache.org>
 > > >> wrote:
 > > >>
 > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
 > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last
 Jean-Louis's
 > > >> merge.
 > > >> >
 > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a
 stage and
 > > the
 > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
 > > >> >
 > > >> > +1 for that.
 > > >> >
 > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
 > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
 > > >> > wrote:
 > > >> >
 > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
 > > >> > >
 > > >> > > +1
 > > >> > >
 > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
 > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
 > > >> > > wrote:
 > > >> > >
 > > >> > > > Hi guys,
 > > >> > > >
 > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github
 but it
 > > >> looks
 > > >> > > ha

Re: Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

*typo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-site-generator.git is
the right one


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory


2017-07-04 18:33 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> imported the generator in https://git-wip-us.apache.
> org/repos/asf?p=tomee-tomee-site-generator.git, will push a warning in
> the svn project for now and we can delete it later
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2017-07-04 18:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
>> Ok submitted https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-gen
>> erator.git,
>>
>> @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except
>> it is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated
>> folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to our
>> generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Old Blog
>>  | Github
>>  | LinkedIn
>>  | JavaEE Factory
>> 
>>
>> 2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>>
>>> Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if
>>> you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
>>> instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau >> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it
>>> - it
>>> > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
>>> > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is
>>> a
>>> > concern at any level.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>> >  | Old Blog
>>> >  | Github <
>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
>>> > 
>>> >
>>> > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
>>> > :
>>> >
>>> > > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > +1
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>>> > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to
>>> date.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <
>>> daniels...@apache.org>
>>> > > >> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
>>> > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last
>>> Jean-Louis's
>>> > > >> merge.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage
>>> and
>>> > > the
>>> > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > +1 for that.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>>> > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > +1
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > wrote:
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > > Hi guys,
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github
>>> but it
>>> > > >> looks
>>> > > >> > > hard,
>>> > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > Anyone against it?
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
>>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
>>> > > equivalent)
>>> > > >> and
>>> > > >> > > > have a github proxy.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we
>>> copy the
>>> > > >> output
>>> > > >> > > to
>>> > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven
>>>

Re: Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

imported the generator in
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-tomee-site-generator.git,
will push a warning in the svn project for now and we can delete it later


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory


2017-07-04 18:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> Ok submitted https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-
> generator.git,
>
> @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except it
> is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated
> folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to our
> generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>
>> Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if
>> you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
>> instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it
>> - it
>> > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
>> > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a
>> > concern at any level.
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>> >  | Old Blog
>> >  | Github <
>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
>> > 
>> >
>> > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
>> > :
>> >
>> > > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>> > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to
>> date.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <
>> daniels...@apache.org>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
>> > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last
>> Jean-Louis's
>> > > >> merge.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage
>> and
>> > > the
>> > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > +1 for that.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>> > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > +1
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > Hi guys,
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but
>> it
>> > > >> looks
>> > > >> > > hard,
>> > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Anyone against it?
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
>> > > equivalent)
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> > > > have a github proxy.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy
>> the
>> > > >> output
>> > > >> > > to
>> > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven
>> > > plugin.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > >> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>> > > >> > > >  | Old Blog
>> > > >> > > >  | Github <
>> > https://github.com/
>> > > >> > > > rmannibucau> |
>> > > >> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE
>> > > Factory
>> > > >> > > > 
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > --
>> > > >> > Daniel Cunha
>> > > >> > https://twitter.

Re: Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Ok submitted
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-generator.git,

@John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except it
is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated
folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to our
generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory


2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :

> Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if
> you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
> instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it -
> it
> > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
> > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a
> > concern at any level.
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
> > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> > :
> >
> > > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to
> date.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last
> Jean-Louis's
> > > >> merge.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage
> and
> > > the
> > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > +1 for that.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > +1
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but
> it
> > > >> looks
> > > >> > > hard,
> > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Anyone against it?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
> > > equivalent)
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > have a github proxy.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy
> the
> > > >> output
> > > >> > > to
> > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven
> > > plugin.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > > >> > > >  | Old Blog
> > > >> > > >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/
> > > >> > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > >> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE
> > > Factory
> > > >> > > > 
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Daniel Cunha
> > > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Site NG on github

[John D. Ament]

Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if
you want a repository.  You may also want to consider using gitwcsub
instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site.

John

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it - it
> doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
> particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a
> concern at any level.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> :
>
> > As in +1 for moving the project :-)
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's
> > >> merge.
> > >> >
> > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and
> > the
> > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
> > >> >
> > >> > +1 for that.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi guys,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it
> > >> looks
> > >> > > hard,
> > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Anyone against it?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
> > equivalent)
> > >> and
> > >> > > > have a github proxy.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the
> > >> output
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven
> > plugin.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >> > > >  | Old Blog
> > >> > > >  | Github <
> https://github.com/
> > >> > > > rmannibucau> |
> > >> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE
> > Factory
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Daniel Cunha
> > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it - it
doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in
particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a
concern at any level.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory


2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore 
:

> As in +1 for moving the project :-)
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's
> >> merge.
> >> >
> >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and
> the
> >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
> >> >
> >> > +1 for that.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> >> > >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi guys,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it
> >> looks
> >> > > hard,
> >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Anyone against it?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or
> equivalent)
> >> and
> >> > > > have a github proxy.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the
> >> output
> >> > > to
> >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven
> plugin.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >> > > >  | Old Blog
> >> > > >  | Github  >> > > > rmannibucau> |
> >> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE
> Factory
> >> > > > 
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Cunha
> >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Re: Site NG on github

[Jonathan Gallimore]

+1

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho 
wrote:

> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date.
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha 
> wrote:
>
> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's
> merge.
> >
> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and the
> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
> >
> > +1 for that.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks
> > > hard,
> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone against it?
> > > >
> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> > > >
> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or equivalent)
> and
> > > > have a github proxy.
> > > >
> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the
> output
> > > to
> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin.
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > > >  | Old Blog
> > > >  | Github  > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>

Re: Site NG on github

[Jonathan Gallimore]

As in +1 for moving the project :-)

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho 
> wrote:
>
>> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
>> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's
>> merge.
>> >
>> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and the
>> > process to deploy in prod will be identical.
>> >
>> > +1 for that.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi guys,
>> > > >
>> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it
>> looks
>> > > hard,
>> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
>> > > >
>> > > > Anyone against it?
>> > > >
>> > > > For reference here is the ticket:
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
>> > > >
>> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or equivalent)
>> and
>> > > > have a github proxy.
>> > > >
>> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the
>> output
>> > > to
>> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin.
>> > > >
>> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>> > > >  | Old Blog
>> > > >  | Github > > > > rmannibucau> |
>> > > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
>> > > > 
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Cunha
>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Site NG on github

[Ivan Junckes Filho]

I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date.

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha  wrote:

> Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
> PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's merge.
>
> But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and the
> process to deploy in prod will be identical.
>
> +1 for that.
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho 
> wrote:
>
> > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks
> > hard,
> > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> > >
> > > Anyone against it?
> > >
> > > For reference here is the ticket:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> > >
> > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or equivalent) and
> > > have a github proxy.
> > >
> > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the output
> > to
> > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin.
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Old Blog
> > >  | Github  > > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > > 
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>

Re: Site NG on github

[Daniel Cunha]

Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN.
PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's merge.

But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and the
process to deploy in prod will be identical.

+1 for that.

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho 
wrote:

> This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks
> hard,
> > they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
> >
> > Anyone against it?
> >
> > For reference here is the ticket:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
> >
> > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or equivalent) and
> > have a github proxy.
> >
> > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the output
> to
> > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github  > rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Site NG on github

[Ivan Junckes Filho]

This would be great, way better than doing svn patches.

+1

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks hard,
> they propose us to move the project to another git repo.
>
> Anyone against it?
>
> For reference here is the ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249
>
> Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or equivalent) and
> have a github proxy.
>
> In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the output to
> content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github  rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>

Site NG on github

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi guys,

I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks hard,
they propose us to move the project to another git repo.

Anyone against it?

For reference here is the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249

Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or equivalent) and
have a github proxy.

In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the output to
content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | JavaEE Factory