Re: [tools-dev] EIS CWS AllowedRelease/AllowedTaskTargets Problems

2010-06-22 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Hi,

On 6/22/10 2:49 PM, Bernd Eilers wrote:

Mathias Bauer wrote:

That's exactly what Stephan said: bureaucratic humbug.



Well I know we do have some members in an
implement_as_you_want_when_you_want_and_dont_care_about_qa-needs_roadmaps_or_documentation
camp but I didn´t really expect you two to be in there ;-)


Name calling aside: what about issues concerning extensions ? Right now 
I have to move the target from the correct milestone 1 of an extension 
to 3.3 or some such to satisfy EIS. Which is kind of bogus. However 
the CWS should be 3.4 or some such since that marks into which 
repository code line the CWS will get integrated.


Just my 2 cents, pl

--
If the designers of X-window built cars, there would be no fewer than
 five steering wheels hidden about the cockpit, none of which followed
 the same principles -- but you'd be able to shift gears with your
 car stereo. Useful feature, that.
-- From the programming notebooks of a heretic, 1990.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org



Re: [tools-dev] Re: Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Thorsten Behrens wrote:

No, really, there's nothing nailed until now. If you or anybody else
knew a better way and(!) offered help and cooperation, there's nothing
that would hold us back from doing it differently.


I find this and(!) slightly worrying - not that I would not lend a
helping hand; but why are you refusing advise from people just
because they may not have time helping you with coding?


Because talk is cheap and if we have one thing in much more abundance 
than we need it is people with an opinion what others should do ?


Just my 2 cents, pl

--
One SVN to rule them all, One SVN to check out from,
 One SVN to commit them all and on the harddisks bind them
 In Las Vegas where the server lies.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org



Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Kay Ramme wrote:
If we have a perfect build system, all switches etc. would be reflected 
in a way, that would lead to a re-build.


Which we won't ...

--
One SVN to rule them all, One SVN to check out from,
 One SVN to commit them all and on the harddisks bind them
 In Las Vegas where the server lies.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org



Re: [tools-dev] OpenGrok!

2008-12-10 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Christian Lins wrote:

On 12/09/08 14:43, Philipp Lohmann wrote:
[snip]

For many cases an alphabetical sort by directory name would be helpful.


Probably, but afaik this is currently not possible with OpenGrok.


Example: search for Symbol EditView

lots of results and really fast, but the results are scattered all 
over ooo: first hit in svx, then two in binfilter, then in forms, then 
in svx, then in binfilter again.


Well, you cannot sort Google results either. Just specify an additional 


Google is not a directory tree specific tool. That's the same as saying 
my dish washer can't do an alphabetical sort either (I'm quite happy 
with that, the dish washer trying to sort its contents would probably 
result in new dishes, but I digress). Since OpenGrok displays the 
directories anyway there should be nothing to prevent it from sorting 
the results it displays by them.



search term, e.g. Symbol EditView and
FilePath svx and you get only results from module svx. Isn't that 
great? ;-)


No, it's lousy but it's at least a functional workaround :-)

Kind regards, pl

--
Someone told me: Smile and be happy, it could be worse
And I smiled and was happy and things became worse.
 -- Author unknown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [tools-dev] How do I rebase a cws?

2008-11-05 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:

Hi Kohei,


As for the 'cws rebase -C' command


isn't this the very same as doing an svn commit . -R in your working copy?


except for the EIS entry, but that doesn't seem to work yet anyway ?

--
Someone told me: Smile and be happy, it could be worse
And I smiled and was happy and things became worse.
 -- Author unknown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]