Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-28 Thread 申远
Thanks for you contribution.

I think using mirror address like
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?filename=incubator/weex/0.20.0/apache-weex-incubating-0.20.0-src.tar.gz=download
would
be more suitable.

Best Regards,
YorkShen

申远


shihan zheng  于2019年4月28日周日 下午2:17写道:

> I have completed the downLoad page development, what suggestions do you
> have for improvement ?
> The PullRequest is:https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/pull/389
>
> York Shen  于2019年4月24日周三 下午3:45写道:
>
> > Got it. I will create a download page and make it right during the next
> > release process.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > York Shen
> >
> > 申远
> >
> > > 在 2019年4月23日,23:30,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> > >
> > >> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the
> > RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova?
> > >
> > > blog.cordova.io is a blog with posts about releases.
> > >
> > >> Or is it necessary to have that page?
> > >
> > > Not that I know of.
> > >
> > >> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include
> npm/gradle
> > distribution channel in Github page
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex> ?
> > >
> > > I personally see no problem in linking do npm, gradle, or whatever
> > > _additional_ distribution methods a project uses for developer
> > > convenience. The idea behind the rules of Apache are that developers
> > > can understand what software they are actually downloading. If you
> > > make sure the Apache releases are equal to npm/gradle/whatever, that
> > > goal is reached and everything should be fine.
> > >
> > > -J
> > >
> > > Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb York Shen <
> > shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> Found it. Thanks.
> > >>
> > >> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the
> > RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova? Or is it necessary to have that page?
> > >>
> > >> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include
> npm/gradle
> > distribution channel in Github page
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex> ?
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> York Shen
> > >>
> > >> 申远
> > >>
> > >>> 在 2019年4月23日,19:21,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> > >>>
> > >>> I would guess the .tgz includes the RELEASENOTES.md that is also in
> > >>> the source code repository.
> > >>>
> > >>> As I wrote before, I am at least not aware of any complaints about
> how
> > >>> Cordova does things from Apache.
> > >>>
> > >>> -J
> > >>>
> > >>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb York Shen <
> > shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> > 
> >  Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and
> > corresponding webpages if it complies ASF policy.
> > 
> >  As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users
> > of both are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as
> > distribution mechanism.
> > 
> >  But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source
> > Distribution?
> > 
> >  Best Regards,
> >  York Shen
> > 
> >  申远
> > 
> > > 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> > >
> > > What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
> > >
> > > The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
> > > command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage
> > and
> > > installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the
> source
> > > code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link
> > probably
> > > takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache
> regarding
> > > this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
> > > center, the source code still is available if needed - so I
> wouldn't
> > > know why this should not be fine.
> > >
> > > -J
> > >
> > > [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
> > > [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
> > >
> > > Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 <
> shenyua...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>
> > >> Hi, developers
> > >>
> > >> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a
> > download
> > >> page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
> > >> requirement of the format for the download page?
> > >>
> > >> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download
> > page [2],
> > >> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source
> distribution"
> > which
> > >> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
> > >>
> > >> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No
> > offense,
> > >> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> > >> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
> > >> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-28 Thread shihan zheng
I have completed the downLoad page development, what suggestions do you
have for improvement ?
The PullRequest is:https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/pull/389

York Shen  于2019年4月24日周三 下午3:45写道:

> Got it. I will create a download page and make it right during the next
> release process.
>
> Best Regards,
> York Shen
>
> 申远
>
> > 在 2019年4月23日,23:30,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> >
> >> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the
> RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova?
> >
> > blog.cordova.io is a blog with posts about releases.
> >
> >> Or is it necessary to have that page?
> >
> > Not that I know of.
> >
> >> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle
> distribution channel in Github page
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex> ?
> >
> > I personally see no problem in linking do npm, gradle, or whatever
> > _additional_ distribution methods a project uses for developer
> > convenience. The idea behind the rules of Apache are that developers
> > can understand what software they are actually downloading. If you
> > make sure the Apache releases are equal to npm/gradle/whatever, that
> > goal is reached and everything should be fine.
> >
> > -J
> >
> > Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb York Shen <
> shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Found it. Thanks.
> >>
> >> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the
> RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova? Or is it necessary to have that page?
> >>
> >> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle
> distribution channel in Github page
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex> ?
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> York Shen
> >>
> >> 申远
> >>
> >>> 在 2019年4月23日,19:21,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> >>>
> >>> I would guess the .tgz includes the RELEASENOTES.md that is also in
> >>> the source code repository.
> >>>
> >>> As I wrote before, I am at least not aware of any complaints about how
> >>> Cordova does things from Apache.
> >>>
> >>> -J
> >>>
> >>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb York Shen <
> shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> 
>  Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and
> corresponding webpages if it complies ASF policy.
> 
>  As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users
> of both are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as
> distribution mechanism.
> 
>  But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source
> Distribution?
> 
>  Best Regards,
>  York Shen
> 
>  申远
> 
> > 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> >
> > What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
> >
> > The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
> > command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage
> and
> > installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
> > code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link
> probably
> > takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
> > this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
> > center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
> > know why this should not be fine.
> >
> > -J
> >
> > [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
> > [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
> >
> > Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远  >:
> >>
> >> Hi, developers
> >>
> >> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a
> download
> >> page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
> >> requirement of the format for the download page?
> >>
> >> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download
> page [2],
> >> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution"
> which
> >> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
> >>
> >> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No
> offense,
> >> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> >> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
> >> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
> >> [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> YorkShen
> >>
> >> 申远
> 
> >>
>
>

-- 

Best Regards!
-
Shihan Zheng (Weex project team member )


Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-24 Thread York Shen
Got it. I will create a download page and make it right during the next release 
process.

Best Regards,
York Shen

申远

> 在 2019年4月23日,23:30,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> 
>> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the 
>> RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova?
> 
> blog.cordova.io is a blog with posts about releases.
> 
>> Or is it necessary to have that page?
> 
> Not that I know of.
> 
>> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle 
>> distribution channel in Github page 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex 
>>  ?
> 
> I personally see no problem in linking do npm, gradle, or whatever
> _additional_ distribution methods a project uses for developer
> convenience. The idea behind the rules of Apache are that developers
> can understand what software they are actually downloading. If you
> make sure the Apache releases are equal to npm/gradle/whatever, that
> goal is reached and everything should be fine.
> 
> -J
> 
> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb York Shen :
>> 
>> Found it. Thanks.
>> 
>> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the 
>> RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova? Or is it necessary to have that page?
>> 
>> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle 
>> distribution channel in Github page 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex 
>>  ?
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> York Shen
>> 
>> 申远
>> 
>>> 在 2019年4月23日,19:21,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
>>> 
>>> I would guess the .tgz includes the RELEASENOTES.md that is also in
>>> the source code repository.
>>> 
>>> As I wrote before, I am at least not aware of any complaints about how
>>> Cordova does things from Apache.
>>> 
>>> -J
>>> 
>>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb York Shen :
 
 Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and 
 corresponding webpages if it complies ASF policy.
 
 As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users of 
 both are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as 
 distribution mechanism.
 
 But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source Distribution?
 
 Best Regards,
 York Shen
 
 申远
 
> 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> 
> What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
> 
> The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
> command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage and
> installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
> code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link probably
> takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
> this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
> center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
> know why this should not be fine.
> 
> -J
> 
> [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
> [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
> 
> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
>> 
>> Hi, developers
>> 
>> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a 
>> download
>> page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
>> requirement of the format for the download page?
>> 
>> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
>> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
>> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
>> 
>> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
>> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
>> 
>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
>> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
>> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
>> [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> YorkShen
>> 
>> 申远
 
>> 



Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-23 Thread Jan Piotrowski
> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the 
> RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova?

blog.cordova.io is a blog with posts about releases.

> Or is it necessary to have that page?

Not that I know of.

> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle 
> distribution channel in Github page 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex 
>  ?

I personally see no problem in linking do npm, gradle, or whatever
_additional_ distribution methods a project uses for developer
convenience. The idea behind the rules of Apache are that developers
can understand what software they are actually downloading. If you
make sure the Apache releases are equal to npm/gradle/whatever, that
goal is reached and everything should be fine.

-J

Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb York Shen :
>
> Found it. Thanks.
>
> Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the 
> RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova? Or is it necessary to have that page?
>
> Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle 
> distribution channel in Github page 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex 
>  ?
>
> Best Regards,
> York Shen
>
> 申远
>
> > 在 2019年4月23日,19:21,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> >
> > I would guess the .tgz includes the RELEASENOTES.md that is also in
> > the source code repository.
> >
> > As I wrote before, I am at least not aware of any complaints about how
> > Cordova does things from Apache.
> >
> > -J
> >
> > Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb York Shen :
> >>
> >> Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and 
> >> corresponding webpages if it complies ASF policy.
> >>
> >> As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users of 
> >> both are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as 
> >> distribution mechanism.
> >>
> >> But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source Distribution?
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> York Shen
> >>
> >> 申远
> >>
> >>> 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> >>>
> >>> What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
> >>>
> >>> The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
> >>> command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage and
> >>> installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
> >>> code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link probably
> >>> takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
> >>> this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
> >>> center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
> >>> know why this should not be fine.
> >>>
> >>> -J
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
> >>> [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
> >>>
> >>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
> 
>  Hi, developers
> 
>  After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a 
>  download
>  page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
>  requirement of the format for the download page?
> 
>  For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
>  while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
>  will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
> 
>  Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
>  but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
> 
>  [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
>  [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
>  [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
>  [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
> 
>  Best Regards,
>  YorkShen
> 
>  申远
> >>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-23 Thread York Shen
Found it. Thanks.

Is there a webpage for release note or change log except for the 
RELEASENOTES.md in Cordova? Or is it necessary to have that page?

Does it comply the ASF’s policy if Weex continues to include npm/gradle 
distribution channel in Github page 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex 
 ?

Best Regards,
York Shen

申远

> 在 2019年4月23日,19:21,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> 
> I would guess the .tgz includes the RELEASENOTES.md that is also in
> the source code repository.
> 
> As I wrote before, I am at least not aware of any complaints about how
> Cordova does things from Apache.
> 
> -J
> 
> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb York Shen :
>> 
>> Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and 
>> corresponding webpages if it complies ASF policy.
>> 
>> As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users of both 
>> are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as distribution 
>> mechanism.
>> 
>> But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source Distribution?
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> York Shen
>> 
>> 申远
>> 
>>> 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
>>> 
>>> What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
>>> 
>>> The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
>>> command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage and
>>> installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
>>> code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link probably
>>> takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
>>> this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
>>> center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
>>> know why this should not be fine.
>>> 
>>> -J
>>> 
>>> [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
>>> [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
>>> 
>>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
 
 Hi, developers
 
 After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a download
 page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
 requirement of the format for the download page?
 
 For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
 while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
 will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
 
 Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
 but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
 
 [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
 [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
 [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
 [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
 
 Best Regards,
 YorkShen
 
 申远
>> 



Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-23 Thread Jan Piotrowski
I would guess the .tgz includes the RELEASENOTES.md that is also in
the source code repository.

As I wrote before, I am at least not aware of any complaints about how
Cordova does things from Apache.

-J

Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb York Shen :
>
> Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and 
> corresponding webpages if it complies ASF policy.
>
> As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users of both 
> are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as distribution 
> mechanism.
>
> But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source Distribution?
>
> Best Regards,
> York Shen
>
> 申远
>
> > 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> >
> > What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
> >
> > The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
> > command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage and
> > installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
> > code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link probably
> > takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
> > this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
> > center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
> > know why this should not be fine.
> >
> > -J
> >
> > [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
> > [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
> >
> > Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
> >>
> >> Hi, developers
> >>
> >> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a download
> >> page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
> >> requirement of the format for the download page?
> >>
> >> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
> >> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
> >> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
> >>
> >> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
> >> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> >> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
> >> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
> >> [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> YorkShen
> >>
> >> 申远
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-23 Thread York Shen
Actually, I’d like to adopt Cordova’s distribution mechanism and corresponding 
webpages if it complies ASF policy.

As far as I understand, Weex is very similar to Cordova.  Main users of both 
are front-end engineers, who would prefer npm or gradle as distribution 
mechanism. 

But is there ChangeLog/ReleaseNote pages for Cordova’s Source Distribution?

Best Regards,
York Shen

申远

> 在 2019年4月23日,18:00,Jan Piotrowski  写道:
> 
> What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?
> 
> The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
> command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage and
> installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
> code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link probably
> takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
> this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
> center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
> know why this should not be fine.
> 
> -J
> 
> [1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
> [2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html
> 
> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
>> 
>> Hi, developers
>> 
>> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a download
>> page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
>> requirement of the format for the download page?
>> 
>> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
>> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
>> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
>> 
>> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
>> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
>> 
>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
>> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
>> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
>> [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> YorkShen
>> 
>> 申远



Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-23 Thread Jan Piotrowski
What part of the release policy are you specifically referring to?

The main distribution mechanism for Apache Cordova is npm, which
command is mentioned in the "Get started" [1] part of the homepage and
installations instructions [2] of the documentation. Using the source
code is just a fallback, which the "Source Distribution" link probably
takes care of. I am not aware of any complaints from Apache regarding
this to Apache Cordova. The main usage type for users is front and
center, the source code still is available if needed - so I wouldn't
know why this should not be fine.

-J

[1] https://cordova.apache.org/#getstarted
[2] https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/cli/index.html

Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
>
> Hi, developers
>
> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a download
> page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
> requirement of the format for the download page?
>
> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
>
> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
> [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
>
> Best Regards,
> YorkShen
>
> 申远


Re: [DISCUSS] Weex Download Page

2019-04-23 Thread 申远
BTW, the current Weex Github page [1] displays third-party download steam
instead of Apache main stream?  I am not sure whether displaying
third-party download link in Github Page complies ASF's policy .

[1]https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex#weex

Best Regards,
YorkShen

申远


申远  于2019年4月23日周二 下午5:50写道:

> Hi, developers
>
> After digging into ASF policy [1], it is clear that Weex missing a
> download page which should links to Weex Apache Release. But is there any
> requirement of the format for the download page?
>
> For example, I found RocketMQ has a specified designed download page [2],
> while Cordova [3] only has a text area called "source distribution" which
> will be redirected to ASF page [4] .
>
> Are both the download pages valid according to ASFs' policy? No offense,
> but it occured to me that Cordova may probably choose a lazy way.
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> [2] https://rocketmq.apache.org/dowloading/releases/
> [3] https://cordova.apache.org/
> [4] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/cordova
>
> Best Regards,
> YorkShen
>
> 申远
>