Re: wicket 1.5 build is failing because of 1.6 deps...

2009-12-28 Thread Ryan McKinley 


we can try to avoid it for some time if possible, but if some stuff  
as nicer

for the core then i am against a separate jar and ugly build system


+1 for 1.6

In my opinion, giving people more reasons to use a newer JVM is better  
(as if speed were not enough)


Seems a shame to futz with a strange build to support people who are  
unable to upgrade in general.  If someone is in an environment where  
they can't upgrade JVM from 1.5 -> 1.6 (in late 2010), then seems odd  
they are allowed to upgrade to a new wicket version.


ryan

Portlet and Liferay support

2009-12-28 Thread Klaus Astner 
Hi,

We are planning to use Wicket in the liferay CMS. The wicket-examples are 
running in liferay but they don't fit with the Portlet standard.

Any experience or hints would be welcome.

Kind regards,
Klaus

Re: devutils write protected?

2009-12-28 Thread Igor Vaynberg 
no clue.

-igor

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems as if devutils is write protected. Any idea why? Anyone able
> to remove that protection?
>
> -Juergen
>

devutils write protected?

2009-12-28 Thread Juergen Donnerstag 
Hi,

it seems as if devutils is write protected. Any idea why? Anyone able
to remove that protection?

-Juergen