[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2186) QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input

2015-05-11 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14537663#comment-14537663
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2186:
--

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12731857/ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch
  against trunk revision 1678645.

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685//console

This message is automatically generated.

 QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2186
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: server
Affects Versions: 3.4.6, 3.5.0
Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
 Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch


 This will allocate an arbitrarily large byte buffer (and try to read it!):
 {code}
 public boolean receiveConnection(Socket sock) {
 Long sid = null;
 ...
 sid = din.readLong();
 // next comes the #bytes in the remainder of the message  

 int num_remaining_bytes = din.readInt();
 byte[] b = new byte[num_remaining_bytes];
 // remove the remainder of the message from din   

 int num_read = din.read(b);
 {code}
 This will crash the QuorumCnxManager thread, so the cluster will keep going 
 but future elections might fail to converge (ditto for leaving/joining 
 members). 
 Patch coming up in a bit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Success: ZOOKEEPER-2186 PreCommit Build #2685

2015-05-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685/

###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE 
###
[...truncated 370583 lines...]
 [exec] +1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
 [exec]   
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12731857/ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch
 [exec]   against trunk revision 1678645.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or 
modified tests.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
messages.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number 
of javac compiler warnings.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
(version 2.0.3) warnings.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of release audit warnings.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.
 [exec] 
 [exec] Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685//testReport/
 [exec] Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
 [exec] Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2685//console
 [exec] 
 [exec] This message is automatically generated.
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] Adding comment to Jira.
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
 [exec] Comment added.
 [exec] 79cafc99528280b11e0960d34e391e1d7a156ff3 logged out
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] Finished build.
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
 [exec] 

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 48 minutes 13 seconds
Archiving artifacts
Sending artifact delta relative to PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build #2683
Archived 24 artifacts
Archive block size is 32768
Received 3 blocks and 33661975 bytes
Compression is 0.3%
Took 12 sec
Recording test results
Description set: ZOOKEEPER-2186
Email was triggered for: Success
Sending email for trigger: Success



###
## FAILED TESTS (if any) 
##
All tests passed

ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008 - Build # 1798 - Still Failing

2015-05-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/1798/

###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE 
###
[...truncated 112 lines...]
   [javacc] File SimpleCharStream.java does not exist.  Will create one.
   [javacc] Parser generated successfully.

jute:
[javac] Compiling 39 source files to 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\build\classes

compile_jute_uptodate:

compile_jute:
[mkdir] Created dir: 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\java\generated
[mkdir] Created dir: 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\generated
 [java] ../../zookeeper.jute Parsed Successfully
 [java] ../../zookeeper.jute Parsed Successfully
[touch] Creating 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\java\generated\.generated

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 9 seconds
[ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008] $ cmd /c call 
C:\Windows\TEMP\hudson2378915579418469026.bat

f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008set 
ZOOKEEPER_HOME=f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk 

f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008msbuild 
trunk/src/c/zookeeper.sln /p:Configuration=Release 
Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 4.0.30319.18408
[Microsoft .NET Framework, version 4.0.30319.18444]
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Building the projects in this solution one at a time. To enable parallel build, 
please add the /m switch.
Build started 5/11/2015 9:22:25 AM.
Project 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln
 on node 1 (default targets).
ValidateSolutionConfiguration:
  Building solution configuration Release|Win32.
zookeeper:
  C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
9.0\Common7\IDE\..\..\vc\vcpackages\VCBuild.exe 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.vcproj
 Release|Win32 
cl : Command line warning D9035: option 'Wp64' has been deprecated and will be 
removed in a future release 
[f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln]
.\src\zookeeper.c(43): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'unistd.h': 
No such file or directory 
[f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln]
Cli:
  C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
9.0\Common7\IDE\..\..\vc\vcpackages\VCBuild.exe 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\Cli.vcproj
 Release|Win32 
Done Building Project 
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln
 (default targets) -- FAILED.

Build FAILED.

f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln
 (default target) (1) -
(zookeeper target) - 
  cl : Command line warning D9035: option 'Wp64' has been deprecated and will 
be removed in a future release 
[f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln]


f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln
 (default target) (1) -
(zookeeper target) - 
  .\src\zookeeper.c(43): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 
'unistd.h': No such file or directory 
[f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008\trunk\src\c\zookeeper.sln]

1 Warning(s)
1 Error(s)

Time Elapsed 00:00:05.73

f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008exit 1 
Build step 'Execute Windows batch command' marked build as failure
Email was triggered for: Failure
Sending email for trigger: Failure



###
## FAILED TESTS (if any) 
##
No tests ran.

ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris - Build # 1028 - Still Failing

2015-05-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris/1028/

###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE 
###
Started by timer
Building remotely on solaris1 (Solaris) in workspace 
/export/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris
Updating http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/trunk at revision 
'2015-05-11T08:31:08.558 +'
D 
src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ReconfigFailureCases.java
A 
src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ReconfigFailureCasesTest.java
D src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/ClientRetry.java
D src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/WatchEventWhenAutoReset.java
A src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/ClientRetryTest.java
A 
src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/WatchEventWhenAutoResetTest.java
U CHANGES.txt
At revision 1678689
Updating http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/nightly at revision 
'2015-05-11T08:31:08.558 +'
At revision 1678689
no change for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/nightly since the previous 
build
No emails were triggered.
[locks-and-latches] Checking to see if we really have the locks
[locks-and-latches] Have all the locks, build can start
[ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris] $ /bin/bash /var/tmp/hudson2574898498699224501.sh
/var/tmp/hudson2574898498699224501.sh: line 12: ant: command not found
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
[locks-and-latches] Releasing all the locks
[locks-and-latches] All the locks released
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure
Sending email for trigger: Failure



###
## FAILED TESTS (if any) 
##
No tests ran.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2188) client connection hung up because of dead loop

2015-05-11 Thread sunhaitao (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14537821#comment-14537821
 ] 

sunhaitao commented on ZOOKEEPER-2188:
--

shuting down the cluster is just one case, another case is like in safe 
authentication failed, the clientCnxn just keeps trying to connect but no feed 
back.

 client connection hung up because of  dead loop
 ---

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2188
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2188
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: java client
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: sunhaitao

 There is something wrong with the client code ClientCnxn.java, it will keep 
 trying to connect to server in a dead loop.
 This is my test step, shut down zookeeper cluster, exectue zkCli.sh script to 
 connect to zookeeper cluster, it will keep trying to connect to zookeeper 
 server without stop.
 public void run() {
 clientCnxnSocket.introduce(this, sessionId, outgoingQueue);
 clientCnxnSocket.updateNow();
 clientCnxnSocket.updateLastSendAndHeard();
 int to;
 long lastPingRwServer = Time.currentElapsedTime();
 final int MAX_SEND_PING_INTERVAL = 1; //10 seconds
 while (state.isAlive()) {
 try {
 if (!clientCnxnSocket.isConnected()) {
 // don't re-establish connection if we are closing
 if (closing) {
 break;
 }
 startConnect();
 clientCnxnSocket.updateLastSendAndHeard();
 }
 public boolean isAlive() {
 return this != CLOSED  this != AUTH_FAILED;
 }
 because at the beginning it is CONNECTING so isAlive always returns true, 
 which leads to dead loop.
 we should add some retry limit to stop this



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2182) Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do not end with Test.

2015-05-11 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14537827#comment-14537827
 ] 

Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-2182:
---

SUCCESS: Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #2688 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/2688/])
ZOOKEEPER-2182 Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because 
their names do not end with Test. (Chris Nauroth via hdeng) (hdeng: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVNview=revrev=1678645)
* /zookeeper/trunk/CHANGES.txt
* 
/zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ReconfigFailureCases.java
* 
/zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ReconfigFailureCasesTest.java
* /zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/ClientRetry.java
* /zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/ClientRetryTest.java
* 
/zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/WatchEventWhenAutoReset.java
* 
/zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/WatchEventWhenAutoResetTest.java


 Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do 
 not end with Test.
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2182
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: tests
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: Chris Nauroth
Assignee: Chris Nauroth
 Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2182.001.patch


 In build.xml, the {{junit}} task definition uses an include pattern of 
 {{\*\*/\*$\{test.category\}Test.java}}.  This is important so that we don't 
 accidentally try to run utility classes like {{PortAssignment}} or 
 {{TestableZooKeeper}} as if they were JUnit suites.  However, several test 
 suites are misnamed so that they don't satisfy this pattern, and therefore 
 pre-commit hasn't been running them.
 {{ClientRetry}}
 {{ReconfigFailureCases}}
 {{WatchEventWhenAutoReset}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2186) QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input

2015-05-11 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14538301#comment-14538301
 ] 

Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2186:
---

[~hdeng]: git-review is broken for me today, mind reviewing in the PR:

https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/30

? Thanks!

 QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2186
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: server
Affects Versions: 3.4.6, 3.5.0
Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
 Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch


 This will allocate an arbitrarily large byte buffer (and try to read it!):
 {code}
 public boolean receiveConnection(Socket sock) {
 Long sid = null;
 ...
 sid = din.readLong();
 // next comes the #bytes in the remainder of the message  

 int num_remaining_bytes = din.readInt();
 byte[] b = new byte[num_remaining_bytes];
 // remove the remainder of the message from din   

 int num_read = din.read(b);
 {code}
 This will crash the QuorumCnxManager thread, so the cluster will keep going 
 but future elections might fail to converge (ditto for leaving/joining 
 members). 
 Patch coming up in a bit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2186) QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input

2015-05-11 Thread Alexander Shraer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14538609#comment-14538609
 ] 

Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2186:
-

Thanks Raul! I was indeed not very careful here. The patch looks good to me 
overall. 
Consider reducing the max buffer size - b only contains a string of the form 
host:port, so jute.maxbuffer and 1 MB may be way too much.

 QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2186
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: server
Affects Versions: 3.4.6, 3.5.0
Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
 Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch


 This will allocate an arbitrarily large byte buffer (and try to read it!):
 {code}
 public boolean receiveConnection(Socket sock) {
 Long sid = null;
 ...
 sid = din.readLong();
 // next comes the #bytes in the remainder of the message  

 int num_remaining_bytes = din.readInt();
 byte[] b = new byte[num_remaining_bytes];
 // remove the remainder of the message from din   

 int num_read = din.read(b);
 {code}
 This will crash the QuorumCnxManager thread, so the cluster will keep going 
 but future elections might fail to converge (ditto for leaving/joining 
 members). 
 Patch coming up in a bit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2183) Change test port assignments to improve uniqueness of ports for multiple concurrent test processes on the same host.

2015-05-11 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Nauroth updated ZOOKEEPER-2183:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2183.001.patch

I'm attaching a patch.  Here is a summary of the changes:
# build.xml: Add support for concurrent execution of tests.  The default is 
still a single JUnit process (same as today), but you can override it by 
passing a command line argument.  This would require everyone to upgrade to Ant 
1.9.4.  I don't know what version Jenkins runs, so if it fails on this, then 
I'll provide another patch without the build.xml change.  On my fairly wimpy 
CentOS VM, I can do a full test run with {{ant -Dtest.junit.threads=8 
-Dtest.output=yes clean test-core-java}} in ~10-15 minutes, down from ~60 
minutes.
# {{PortAssignment}}: I rewrote this to assign ports by binding to an ephemeral 
port temporarily.  I documented that there is still a very small race condition 
risk, but it's going to be much better than the current situation where 
multiple JUnit processes starting from the same base port number could collide. 
 I did explore trying to bootstrap test servers with port 0 to eliminate this 
race condition completely, but that would have required intrusive changes in 
product code and tests that expect to know all their port numbers upfront 
before running anything.
# Multiple test suites are updated to skip starting {{JettyAdminServer}}, so 
that we don't get a {{BindException}} when they all try to use the same port.  
All test suites that inherit from {{ZKTestCase}} already do this.
# Multiple tests are updated to remove + 1000 logic from their port 
assignments.  This looks like it was an attempt to offset port numbers a bit in 
certain tests to try to increase the probability of uniqueness.  This is no 
longer necessary with the new {{PortAssignment}}.  Also, the logic is 
incorrect, because it could inadvertently cause a port collision or overflow 
past the valid range for port numbers.

I've tried multiple concurrent test runs with this patch, and there are no 
signs of a {{BindException}}, so I think this covers the changes we need in 
port assignments.

 Change test port assignments to improve uniqueness of ports for multiple 
 concurrent test processes on the same host.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2183
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2183
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: tests
Reporter: Chris Nauroth
Assignee: Chris Nauroth
 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2183.001.patch


 Tests use {{PortAssignment#unique}} for assignment of the ports to bind 
 during tests.  Currently, this method works by using a monotonically 
 increasing counter from a static starting point.  Generally, this is 
 sufficient to achieve uniqueness within a single JVM process, but it does not 
 achieve uniqueness across multiple processes on the same host.  This can 
 cause tests to get bind errors if there are multiple pre-commit jobs running 
 concurrently on the same Jenkins host.  This also prevents running tests in 
 parallel to improve the speed of pre-commit runs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Failed: ZOOKEEPER-2183 PreCommit Build #2686

2015-05-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2183
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2686/

###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE 
###
[...truncated 371868 lines...]
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 35 new or 
modified tests.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
messages.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number 
of javac compiler warnings.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
(version 2.0.3) warnings.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of release audit warnings.
 [exec] 
 [exec] -1 core tests.  The patch failed core unit tests.
 [exec] 
 [exec] +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.
 [exec] 
 [exec] Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2686//testReport/
 [exec] Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2686//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
 [exec] Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2686//console
 [exec] 
 [exec] This message is automatically generated.
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] Adding comment to Jira.
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
 [exec] Comment added.
 [exec] 8af7e65f85d95c6f25dabc7d5763a82127de1b32 logged out
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] Finished build.
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
==
 [exec] 
 [exec] 

BUILD FAILED
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/trunk/build.xml:1732:
 exec returned: 1

Total time: 43 minutes 37 seconds
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Sending artifact delta relative to PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build #2685
Archived 7 artifacts
Archive block size is 32768
Received 6 blocks and 366037 bytes
Compression is 34.9%
Took 4.8 sec
Recording test results
Description set: ZOOKEEPER-2183
Email was triggered for: Failure
Sending email for trigger: Failure



###
## FAILED TESTS (if any) 
##
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION:  
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.ReconfigRecoveryTest.testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig

Error Message:
waiting for server 2 being up

Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: waiting for server 2 being up
at 
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.ReconfigRecoveryTest.testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig(ReconfigRecoveryTest.java:529)
at 
org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUnit4ZKTestRunner.java:55)


REGRESSION:  
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.StandaloneDisabledTest.startSingleServerTest

Error Message:
null

Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
at 
org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testServerHasConfig(ReconfigTest.java:121)
at 
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.StandaloneDisabledTest.testReconfig(StandaloneDisabledTest.java:238)
at 
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.StandaloneDisabledTest.startSingleServerTest(StandaloneDisabledTest.java:91)
at 
org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUnit4ZKTestRunner.java:55)




[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2183) Change test port assignments to improve uniqueness of ports for multiple concurrent test processes on the same host.

2015-05-11 Thread Hongchao Deng (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14539253#comment-14539253
 ] 

Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2183:
--

StandaloneDisabledTest.startSingleServerTest was flaky in this case -- I run 
that single test successfully in local.

Let me run again the entire test suite...

 Change test port assignments to improve uniqueness of ports for multiple 
 concurrent test processes on the same host.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2183
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2183
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: tests
Reporter: Chris Nauroth
Assignee: Chris Nauroth
 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2183.001.patch


 Tests use {{PortAssignment#unique}} for assignment of the ports to bind 
 during tests.  Currently, this method works by using a monotonically 
 increasing counter from a static starting point.  Generally, this is 
 sufficient to achieve uniqueness within a single JVM process, but it does not 
 achieve uniqueness across multiple processes on the same host.  This can 
 cause tests to get bind errors if there are multiple pre-commit jobs running 
 concurrently on the same Jenkins host.  This also prevents running tests in 
 parallel to improve the speed of pre-commit runs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2182) Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do not end with Test.

2015-05-11 Thread Rakesh R (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14539278#comment-14539278
 ] 

Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-2182:
-

Thanks all for taking care this. [~hdeng] am closing this jira as I think the 
changes has been applied/committed. Please feel to re-open if anything to be 
done.

 Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do 
 not end with Test.
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2182
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: tests
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: Chris Nauroth
Assignee: Chris Nauroth
 Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2182.001.patch


 In build.xml, the {{junit}} task definition uses an include pattern of 
 {{\*\*/\*$\{test.category\}Test.java}}.  This is important so that we don't 
 accidentally try to run utility classes like {{PortAssignment}} or 
 {{TestableZooKeeper}} as if they were JUnit suites.  However, several test 
 suites are misnamed so that they don't satisfy this pattern, and therefore 
 pre-commit hasn't been running them.
 {{ClientRetry}}
 {{ReconfigFailureCases}}
 {{WatchEventWhenAutoReset}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2182) Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do not end with Test.

2015-05-11 Thread Hongchao Deng (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14539286#comment-14539286
 ] 

Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2182:
--

Thank you! My mistake to forget close it.

 Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do 
 not end with Test.
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2182
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: tests
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: Chris Nauroth
Assignee: Chris Nauroth
 Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2182.001.patch


 In build.xml, the {{junit}} task definition uses an include pattern of 
 {{\*\*/\*$\{test.category\}Test.java}}.  This is important so that we don't 
 accidentally try to run utility classes like {{PortAssignment}} or 
 {{TestableZooKeeper}} as if they were JUnit suites.  However, several test 
 suites are misnamed so that they don't satisfy this pattern, and therefore 
 pre-commit hasn't been running them.
 {{ClientRetry}}
 {{ReconfigFailureCases}}
 {{WatchEventWhenAutoReset}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

2015-05-11 Thread Rakesh R (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14539273#comment-14539273
 ] 

Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-1667:
-

Good catch. Thanks [~cnauroth]

 Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server
 -

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1667
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: server
Affects Versions: 3.3.6, 3.4.5
Reporter: Jacky007
Assignee: Flavio Junqueira
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: 3.4.6, 3.5.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1667-b3.4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1667-b3.4.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-1667-r34.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1667-trunk.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1667.patch


 When a client reestablish to a server, it will send the watches which have 
 not been triggered. But the code in DataTree does not handle it correctly.
 It is obvious, we just do not notice it :)
 scenario:
 1) Client a set a data watch on /d, then disconnect, client b delete /d and 
 create it again. When client a reestablish to zk, it will receive a 
 NodeCreated rather than a NodeDataChanged.
 2) Client a set a exists watch on /e(not exist), then disconnect, client b 
 create /e. When client a reestablish to zk, it will receive a NodeDataChanged 
 rather than a NodeCreated.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2186) QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input

2015-05-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14538294#comment-14538294
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2186:
---

GitHub user rgs1 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/30

ZOOKEEPER-2186: QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with ran…

…dom input

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/rgs1/zookeeper ZOOKEEPER-2186

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/30.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #30


commit ff9cdc570fb4c84acf3c8b0c64875b5e54d82523
Author: Raul Gutierrez S r...@twitter.com
Date:   2015-05-11T17:48:47Z

ZOOKEEPER-2186: QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random 
input




 QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2186
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: server
Affects Versions: 3.4.6, 3.5.0
Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
 Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch


 This will allocate an arbitrarily large byte buffer (and try to read it!):
 {code}
 public boolean receiveConnection(Socket sock) {
 Long sid = null;
 ...
 sid = din.readLong();
 // next comes the #bytes in the remainder of the message  

 int num_remaining_bytes = din.readInt();
 byte[] b = new byte[num_remaining_bytes];
 // remove the remainder of the message from din   

 int num_read = din.read(b);
 {code}
 This will crash the QuorumCnxManager thread, so the cluster will keep going 
 but future elections might fail to converge (ditto for leaving/joining 
 members). 
 Patch coming up in a bit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[GitHub] zookeeper pull request: ZOOKEEPER-2186: QuorumCnxManager#receiveCo...

2015-05-11 Thread rgs1
GitHub user rgs1 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/30

ZOOKEEPER-2186: QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with ran…

…dom input

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/rgs1/zookeeper ZOOKEEPER-2186

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/30.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #30


commit ff9cdc570fb4c84acf3c8b0c64875b5e54d82523
Author: Raul Gutierrez S r...@twitter.com
Date:   2015-05-11T17:48:47Z

ZOOKEEPER-2186: QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random 
input




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2182) Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do not end with Test.

2015-05-11 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14538257#comment-14538257
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on ZOOKEEPER-2182:
--

Thank you for the reviews and commit, Hongchao and Alex.

 Several test suites are not running during pre-commit, because their names do 
 not end with Test.
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2182
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2182
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: tests
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: Chris Nauroth
Assignee: Chris Nauroth
 Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2182.001.patch


 In build.xml, the {{junit}} task definition uses an include pattern of 
 {{\*\*/\*$\{test.category\}Test.java}}.  This is important so that we don't 
 accidentally try to run utility classes like {{PortAssignment}} or 
 {{TestableZooKeeper}} as if they were JUnit suites.  However, several test 
 suites are misnamed so that they don't satisfy this pattern, and therefore 
 pre-commit hasn't been running them.
 {{ClientRetry}}
 {{ReconfigFailureCases}}
 {{WatchEventWhenAutoReset}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2186) QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input

2015-05-11 Thread Hongchao Deng (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14538116#comment-14538116
 ] 

Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2186:
--

[~rgs]
Can you open a RB for this?

I have some questions and comments to make. Thanks!

 QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection may crash with random input
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2186
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2186
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: server
Affects Versions: 3.4.6, 3.5.0
Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
 Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.1, 3.6.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2186.patch


 This will allocate an arbitrarily large byte buffer (and try to read it!):
 {code}
 public boolean receiveConnection(Socket sock) {
 Long sid = null;
 ...
 sid = din.readLong();
 // next comes the #bytes in the remainder of the message  

 int num_remaining_bytes = din.readInt();
 byte[] b = new byte[num_remaining_bytes];
 // remove the remainder of the message from din   

 int num_read = din.read(b);
 {code}
 This will crash the QuorumCnxManager thread, so the cluster will keep going 
 but future elections might fail to converge (ditto for leaving/joining 
 members). 
 Patch coming up in a bit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)