Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Patrick Hunt]

Looks like lucene/solr stuck with patches attached to jiras:
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToContribute

Same with Hadoop
https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute#Making_Changes

Patrick

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> Hm. Looks pretty straightforward - although in our case we have to
> consider that git repos already exist (for bk it was new). From the
> lucene infra jira it looks like they said to recreate the git repo and
> mirror. The additional side effect of doing that would be that all the
> "limbo" PRs will get blown away.
>
> As part of this change we'll need to consider how to change our HTC
> process. e.g. do we still want to require folks to attach patches to
> jiras or can we just use PRs to do it. If so how. What about review
> process.
>
> How is BK handling this?
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Flavio Junqueira
>  wrote:
>> Right, we moved to a git repo when the project became TLP:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8701 
>> 
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:12, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this for what
>>> lucene/solr recently did:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11056 "Migrate Lucene
>>> project from SVN to Git."
>>>
>>> I'm also +1 for git.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:
 Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 
 

 -Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  
> wrote:
>
> I am +1 on moving to git as well.
>
> What did it take for other Apache projects?
>
> -rgs
> On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>
>> I'd like to move to git...
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>>
>>> I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
>>> However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
>>> there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
>>> (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.
>>>
>>> That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
>>> to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
>>> moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
>>> interested to do so.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
>> wrote:
 I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
>> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)

 -Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés 
> 
>> wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>>
>> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've
>> done
> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a
>> while,
> it works pretty well.
>
> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
> github...
>
> -rgs
>
>>
>> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
>>> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
>>> pull requests that way:
>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
>>>
>>> rather through our Jira process
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
>>>
>>> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like 
>>> we
>>> should do something about this.
>>>
>>> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
>>> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
>>> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
>>> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next
>> few
>>> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
>>> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
>>> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests 
>>> on
>>> the mirror.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Patrick Hunt]

Hm. Looks pretty straightforward - although in our case we have to
consider that git repos already exist (for bk it was new). From the
lucene infra jira it looks like they said to recreate the git repo and
mirror. The additional side effect of doing that would be that all the
"limbo" PRs will get blown away.

As part of this change we'll need to consider how to change our HTC
process. e.g. do we still want to require folks to attach patches to
jiras or can we just use PRs to do it. If so how. What about review
process.

How is BK handling this?

Patrick

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Flavio Junqueira
 wrote:
> Right, we moved to a git repo when the project became TLP:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8701 
> 
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:12, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>
>> Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this for what
>> lucene/solr recently did:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11056 "Migrate Lucene
>> project from SVN to Git."
>>
>> I'm also +1 for git.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:
>>> Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 
>>> 
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
 On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  
 wrote:

 I am +1 on moving to git as well.

 What did it take for other Apache projects?

 -rgs
 On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:

> I'd like to move to git...
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>
>> I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
>> However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
>> there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
>> (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.
>>
>> That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
>> to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
>> moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
>> interested to do so.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
> wrote:
>>> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
 On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés 
> wrote:

 On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>
> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've
> done
 the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a
> while,
 it works pretty well.

 Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
 github...

 -rgs

>
> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
>> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
>> pull requests that way:
>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
>>
>> rather through our Jira process
>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
>>
>> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
>> should do something about this.
>>
>> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
>> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
>> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
>> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next
> few
>> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
>> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
>> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
>> the mirror.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
>> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
>> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
>> well arg.
>
>>>
>
>
>>>
>

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Flavio Junqueira]

Right, we moved to a git repo when the project became TLP:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8701 


-Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:12, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> 
> Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this for what
> lucene/solr recently did:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11056 "Migrate Lucene
> project from SVN to Git."
> 
> I'm also +1 for git.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:
>> Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper:
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 
>> 
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am +1 on moving to git as well.
>>> 
>>> What did it take for other Apache projects?
>>> 
>>> -rgs
>>> On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>>> 
 I'd like to move to git...
 
 -Flavio
 
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> 
> I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
> However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
> there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
> (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.
> 
> That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
> to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
> moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
> interested to do so.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
 wrote:
>> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
 is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés 
 wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
 
 +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've
 done
>>> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a
 while,
>>> it works pretty well.
>>> 
>>> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
>>> github...
>>> 
>>> -rgs
>>> 
 
 I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
 
 -Flavio
 
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> 
> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
> pull requests that way:
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
> 
> rather through our Jira process
> 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
> 
> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
> should do something about this.
> 
> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next
 few
> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
> the mirror.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
> well arg.
 
>> 
 
 
>> 

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Patrick Hunt]

Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this for what
lucene/solr recently did:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11056 "Migrate Lucene
project from SVN to Git."

I'm also +1 for git.

Patrick


On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:
> Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 
> 
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  
>> wrote:
>>
>> I am +1 on moving to git as well.
>>
>> What did it take for other Apache projects?
>>
>> -rgs
>> On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to move to git...
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
 On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

 I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
 However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
 there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
 (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.

 That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
 to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
 moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
 interested to do so.

 Patrick

 On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
>>> wrote:
> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
>>> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés 
>>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've
>>> done
>> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a
>>> while,
>> it works pretty well.
>>
>> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
>> github...
>>
>> -rgs
>>
>>>
>>> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
 On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

 Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
 request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
 pull requests that way:
 https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls

 rather through our Jira process

>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute

 someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
 should do something about this.

 I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
 can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
 check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
 something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next
>>> few
 days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
 (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
 the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
 the mirror.

 Patrick

 ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
 to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
 PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
 well arg.
>>>
>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Flavio Junqueira]

Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 


-Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  wrote:
> 
> I am +1 on moving to git as well.
> 
> What did it take for other Apache projects?
> 
> -rgs
> On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to move to git...
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
>>> However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
>>> there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
>>> (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.
>>> 
>>> That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
>>> to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
>>> moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
>>> interested to do so.
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
>> wrote:
 I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
>> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
 
 -Flavio
 
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés 
>> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've
>> done
> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a
>> while,
> it works pretty well.
> 
> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
> github...
> 
> -rgs
> 
>> 
>> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
>>> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
>>> pull requests that way:
>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
>>> 
>>> rather through our Jira process
>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
>>> 
>>> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
>>> should do something about this.
>>> 
>>> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
>>> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
>>> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
>>> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next
>> few
>>> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
>>> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
>>> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
>>> the mirror.
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
>>> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
>>> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
>>> well arg.
>> 
 
>> 
>> 

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés]

I am +1 on moving to git as well.

What did it take for other Apache projects?

-rgs
On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:

> I'd like to move to git...
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> > I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
> > However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
> > there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
> > (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.
> >
> > That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
> > to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
> > moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
> > interested to do so.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
> wrote:
> >> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
> >>
> >> -Flavio
> >>
> >>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
> 
>  +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've
> done
> >>> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a
> while,
> >>> it works pretty well.
> >>>
> >>> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
> >>> github...
> >>>
> >>> -rgs
> >>>
> 
>  I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
> 
>  -Flavio
> 
> > On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
> > request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
> > pull requests that way:
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
> >
> > rather through our Jira process
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
> >
> > someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
> > should do something about this.
> >
> > I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
> > can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
> > check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
> > something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next
> few
> > days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
> > (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
> > the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
> > the mirror.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
> > to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
> > PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
> > well arg.
> 
> >>
>
>

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Flavio Junqueira]

I'd like to move to git...

-Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> 
> I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
> However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
> there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
> (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.
> 
> That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
> to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
> moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
> interested to do so.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:
>> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat is 
>> proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
 
 +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done
>>> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while,
>>> it works pretty well.
>>> 
>>> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
>>> github...
>>> 
>>> -rgs
>>> 
 
 I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
 
 -Flavio
 
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> 
> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
> pull requests that way:
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
> 
> rather through our Jira process
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
> 
> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
> should do something about this.
> 
> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next few
> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
> the mirror.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
> well arg.
 
>> 

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Patrick Hunt]

I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo.
However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly
there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this
(github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know.

That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like
to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just
moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're
interested to do so.

Patrick

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:
> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat is 
> proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done
>> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while,
>> it works pretty well.
>>
>> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
>> github...
>>
>> -rgs
>>
>>>
>>> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
 On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

 Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
 request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
 pull requests that way:
 https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls

 rather through our Jira process
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute

 someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
 should do something about this.

 I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
 can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
 check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
 something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next few
 days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
 (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
 the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
 the mirror.

 Patrick

 ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
 to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
 PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
 well arg.
>>>
>

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Flavio Junqueira]

I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat is 
proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)

-Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés  wrote:
> 
> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done
> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while,
> it works pretty well.
> 
> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
> github...
> 
> -rgs
> 
>> 
>> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
>>> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
>>> pull requests that way:
>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
>>> 
>>> rather through our Jira process
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
>>> 
>>> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
>>> should do something about this.
>>> 
>>> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
>>> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
>>> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
>>> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next few
>>> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
>>> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
>>> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
>>> the mirror.
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
>>> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
>>> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
>>> well arg.
>> 

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés]

On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira"  wrote:
>
> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done
the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while,
it works pretty well.

Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
github...

-rgs

>
> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it.
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
> > request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
> > pull requests that way:
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
> >
> > rather through our Jira process
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
> >
> > someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
> > should do something about this.
> >
> > I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
> > can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
> > check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
> > something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next few
> > days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
> > (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
> > the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
> > the mirror.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
> > to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
> > PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
> > well arg.
>

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Flavio Junqueira]

+1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done the 
transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while, it works 
pretty well.

I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it. 

-Flavio

> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> 
> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
> pull requests that way:
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
> 
> rather through our Jira process
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
> 
> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
> should do something about this.
> 
> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next few
> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
> the mirror.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
> well arg.

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

[Camille Fournier]

I'll start responding to some of these with a link to the HTC page to help
get it done.

C


On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull
> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept
> pull requests that way:
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls
>
> rather through our Jira process
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
>
> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we
> should do something about this.
>
> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they
> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to
> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do
> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next few
> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests
> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing
> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on
> the mirror.
>
> Patrick
>
> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them
> to follow the HTC page I don't seem to be able to close out the
> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as
> well arg.
>