[dev-context] beta
Hi Wolfgang et al, I cleaned up mkiv'd pack-rul, meta-ini, anch-pgr etc and for sure there have been bugs introduced. A couple of mkii artefacts have been removed and some speedups were possible (important as framed is a core macro so especially backgrounds have been redone a bit). I still have to look into framed using the commandhandler but let's first check if the current variant is ok. I'll put a beta on the ftp server, so you might want to test, Hans PS. A few observations: \vbox -> hbox (less callback overhead), kern -> glue (less memory and calback overhead) i.e. some boxing has changed but hopefully for the best. PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, namespaces, etc). - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
Re: [dev-context] beta
Am 21.12.2011 um 23:26 schrieb Hans Hagen: > Hi Wolfgang et al, > > I cleaned up mkiv'd pack-rul, meta-ini, anch-pgr etc and for sure there have > been bugs introduced. A couple of mkii artefacts have been removed and some > speedups were possible (important as framed is a core macro so especially > backgrounds have been redone a bit). I still have to look into framed using > the commandhandler but let's first check if the current variant is ok. > > I'll put a beta on the ftp server, so you might want to test, pack-rul.mkiv \startframed nice:) Tested with a large document and a few test files and they run fine. > Hans > > PS. A few observations: \vbox -> hbox (less callback overhead), kern -> glue > (less memory and calback overhead) i.e. some boxing has changed but hopefully > for the best. > > PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, > namespaces, etc). Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested method to name them: \newcount: \c_… \newdimen: \d_… \newskip: \s_… \newbox: \b_… \newtoks: \t_… Wolfgang ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
[dev-context] type-mar.mkvi
Hi Hans, the \margindata commands still used the no longer available \dosetupstrut command. Wolfgang ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
Re: [dev-context] beta
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, namespaces, etc). Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested method to name them: \newcount: \c_… \newdimen: \d_… \newskip: \s_… \newbox: \b_… \newtoks: \t_… I hope you don't converge to LaTeX3 syntax after all the rewrite is over :) Aditya___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
Re: [dev-context] beta
Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >>> PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, >>> namespaces, etc). >> >> Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested >> method to name them: >> >> \newcount: \c_… >> \newdimen: \d_… >> \newskip: \s_… >> \newbox: \b_… >> \newtoks: \t_… > > I hope you don't converge to LaTeX3 syntax after all the rewrite is over :) Don’t you already use your own syntax? Wolfgang ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
Re: [dev-context] beta
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, namespaces, etc). Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested method to name them: \newcount: \c_… \newdimen: \d_… \newskip: \s_… \newbox: \b_… \newtoks: \t_… I hope you don't converge to LaTeX3 syntax after all the rewrite is over :) Don’t you already use your own syntax? No. I reverted to the new internal syntax last week. Now I am using \modulename@macro_name etc. Aditya___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
Re: [dev-context] beta
Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >>> PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, >>> namespaces, etc). >> >> Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested >> method to name them: >> >> \newcount: \c_… >> \newdimen: \d_… >> \newskip: \s_… >> \newbox: \b_… >> \newtoks: \t_… > > I hope you don't converge to LaTeX3 syntax after all the rewrite is over :) No, i think there code is too complicated to understand without an knowledge about the syntax. The original purpose of the underscore in context was for modules to provide a namespace for macros. With the prefixes for registers there is a easy method to see whether a register is a counter, a dimension or a box (i know \c_… could also stand for a conditional and \s_… for a signal) but they are only used for internal code. All public command which can be used should remain without underscores, e.g. \doifelsenextbgroup etc. Wolfgang ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
