Re: [feature] open certain domains into a private window
On 24.06.2015 10:09, Karl Dubost wrote: Le 23 juin 2015 à 20:57, Andreas Tolfsen a...@mozilla.com a écrit : Is it an option to register two browser handlers in the operating system for Firefox? nope. Because only Firefox knows based on your preferences which domains you always want in a private mode silo. Imagine a series of Firefox silos (or buckets), in this bucket I only accept these domains, subdomains. Each silo is unable to communicate with another one. So you are sure that when you surfing a certain domain there will be no spill of your data, tracking, etc. This reminds me of the great work Sid and Monica (from Firefox Security Engineering) have done on explaining the notion of Contextual Identity (http://www.w2spconf.com/2013/papers/s1p2.pdf) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: [feature] open certain domains into a private window
Le 23 juin 2015 à 20:57, Andreas Tolfsen a...@mozilla.com a écrit : Is it an option to register two browser handlers in the operating system for Firefox? nope. Because only Firefox knows based on your preferences which domains you always want in a private mode silo. Imagine a series of Firefox silos (or buckets), in this bucket I only accept these domains, subdomains. Each silo is unable to communicate with another one. So you are sure that when you surfing a certain domain there will be no spill of your data, tracking, etc. -- Karl Dubost, Mozilla http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
How to getting custom protocol custom-protocol://some-uri-path to act like http to support page browser?
For example. custom-protocol://some-uri-path/test.html I want the test.html works like http://some-web-site/test.html That I can navigate in the html page. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: How to getting custom protocol custom-protocol://some-uri-path to act like http to support page browser?
在 2015年6月24日星期三 UTC+8下午7:38:01，Philipp Kewisch写道： On 6/24/15 1:10 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: For example. custom-protocol://some-uri-path/test.html I want the test.html works like http://some-web-site/test.html That I can navigate in the html page. Check out nsIProtocolHandler Here is an implementation that directly forwards to http(s): http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/calendar/base/src/calProtocolHandler.js Philipp This is forwards to https, but I am forwards to resource:// That's really different. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: How to getting custom protocol custom-protocol://some-uri-path to act like http to support page browser?
On 6/24/15 1:10 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: For example. custom-protocol://some-uri-path/test.html I want the test.html works like http://some-web-site/test.html That I can navigate in the html page. Check out nsIProtocolHandler Here is an implementation that directly forwards to http(s): http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/calendar/base/src/calProtocolHandler.js Philipp ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: [feature] open certain domains into a private window
I don't know if this helps, but I use 2 Firefox Add-ons that do an almost expected behavior (with respect to the request in this thread). 1. Profilist https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/profilist - creates multiple profiles. 2. Private Tab https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/private-tab - adds a Open in New Private Tab / Window context menu option that opens the links in Private Tab / Window. No, I didn't create these add-ons and am not trying to promote them for more downloads. I'm only trying to help. Hope these satisfies your expectations. Cheers, ~ shine On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Frederik Braun fbr...@mozilla.com wrote: On 24.06.2015 10:09, Karl Dubost wrote: Le 23 juin 2015 à 20:57, Andreas Tolfsen a...@mozilla.com a écrit : Is it an option to register two browser handlers in the operating system for Firefox? nope. Because only Firefox knows based on your preferences which domains you always want in a private mode silo. Imagine a series of Firefox silos (or buckets), in this bucket I only accept these domains, subdomains. Each silo is unable to communicate with another one. So you are sure that when you surfing a certain domain there will be no spill of your data, tracking, etc. This reminds me of the great work Sid and Monica (from Firefox Security Engineering) have done on explaining the notion of Contextual Identity (http://www.w2spconf.com/2013/papers/s1p2.pdf) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: [feature] open certain domains into a private window
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Aaron Klotz akl...@mozilla.com wrote: I would like to see this as an addition to tab queues: having an option in the toast to choose to open the link in a private tab. This would be valuable, I think. We have a (new) flag for opening all links in PB mode; this should work with that. Worth filing a ticket (if there is not yet one). Nick ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: [feature] open certain domains into a private window
On 2015-06-23 8:57 PM, Andreas Tolfsen wrote: On 23 Jun 2015, at 20:24, Karl Dubost kdub...@mozilla.com wrote: Le 23 juin 2015 à 19:16, Eric Shepherd esheph...@mozilla.com a écrit : I thought we had an open in new private window option when right clicking links. Not a total solution but helps. My I'm reading an email with a link to Google Doc was assuming an email client (not webmail), could be IRC, or anything else outside of the browser. Is it an option to register two browser handlers in the operating system for Firefox? One for regular Firefox, and one for Firefox in private mode? We already have that, but that won't help for Karl's use case. The technical work involved in fixing what Karl is asking for is simple. The UX we want to expose the feature through is the more interesting question IMO. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: How to getting custom protocol custom-protocol://some-uri-path to act like http to support page browser?
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Yonggang Luo luoyongg...@gmail.com wrote: 在 2015年6月24日星期三 UTC+8下午7:38:01，Philipp Kewisch写道： On 6/24/15 1:10 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: For example. custom-protocol://some-uri-path/test.html I want the test.html works like http://some-web-site/test.html That I can navigate in the html page. Check out nsIProtocolHandler Here is an implementation that directly forwards to http(s): http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/calendar/base/src/calProtocolHandler.js Philipp This is forwards to https, but I am forwards to resource:// That's really different. I'm quite sure I already told you about this, but https://github.com/ncalexan/fennec-bootstrapper includes a bootstrapper:// protocol which does something quite similar: it handles bootstrapper://URI like URI. It does some things around privileges that I found necessary to load http (and resource, I think) schemes in a privileged context. Nick ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Please help test the low integrity NPAPI plugin sandbox for Flash on Windows
Hi all, At the end of last week I landed patches that allow us to add running at low integrity to our potential sandbox policy for NPAPI processes on Windows. I would be grateful if anyone who uses Nightly on Windows would test the Flash plugin running with our sandbox. You can do this by setting the following pref: dom.ipc.plugins.sandbox-level.flash=2 If the flash NPAPI process is already running, you'll need to restart for this to take affect. I'm particularly interested in testing on 64-bit Firefox, but 32-bit will be useful as well. On 32-bit, setting this pref will automatically turn off Flash's own protected mode. Please file any issues you find to block bug 1123759. Thanks, Bob ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: How to getting custom protocol custom-protocol://some-uri-path to act like http to support page browser?
2015-06-25 7:26 GMT+08:00 Nicholas Alexander nalexan...@mozilla.com: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Yonggang Luo luoyongg...@gmail.com wrote: 在 2015年6月24日星期三 UTC+8下午7:38:01，Philipp Kewisch写道： On 6/24/15 1:10 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: For example. custom-protocol://some-uri-path/test.html I want the test.html works like http://some-web-site/test.html That I can navigate in the html page. Check out nsIProtocolHandler Here is an implementation that directly forwards to http(s): http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/calendar/base/src/calProtocolHandler.js Philipp This is forwards to https, but I am forwards to resource:// That's really different. I'm quite sure I already told you about this, but https://github.com/ncalexan/fennec-bootstrapper includes a bootstrapper:// protocol which does something quite similar: it handles bootstrapper://URI like URI. It does some things around privileges that I found necessary to load http (and resource, I think) schemes in a privileged context. Yes, I've already done that, but resource is totally different from http when I running To getting resource act like http, we need do preferences work to getting the bootstrap URI can load internally pref(network.protocol-handler.expose.bootstrap, true); Nick -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
