Re: [Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
At least alt-dcs=1 should be worth of trying. Some phones are known to require it. But if you want to try this, you must send push as binary sm. Aarno On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 12:37 AM, Szymon Stasik wrote: I wonder if the problem may be related to the one with sending wap push on siemens modems - some DCS flags? szymon Szymon Stasik wrote: > I can try falcom A1 tommorow (and maybe siemens as well...). However in > the meantime I have found that this is not a kannel specific problem but > rather siemens specific. The same problem exists while using some Nokia > PPG (Artus?) software to send wap push to a siemens m50/me45. > > Anyway I'll try to investigate it since It is very important to me to > have wap push working on siemens and I would be glad to use kannel for it. > > so I am looking now for any hints regarding some bugs in siemens' wap > push decoding. > > regards, > > szymon > > Aarno Syvänen wrote: > >> can you use siemens as a modem ? Then logs would be more revealing. >> >> Aarno >> >> On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: >> >>> >>> kannel.log is only (with log-level 0): >>> >>> 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [16] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox >>> 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: smscconn_sender >>> (CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9971:test_ae): sending message >>> 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store >>> >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Szymon >>> >>> Aarno Syvänen wrote: >>> >>>> And the bearerbox log ? >>>> Aarno >>>> On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: >>>> >>>>> my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> Original Message >>>>> Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens >>>>> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 >>>>> From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Organization: Wapme Systems AG >>>>> To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>>> Szymon Stasik wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: >>>>> > >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for >>>>> `127.0.0.1'. >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request >>>>> > from <127.0.0.1> >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart >>>>> > accepted >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, >>>>> accepted >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic >>>>> analysis >>>>> > for address type a phone number >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control >>>>> > entity compiled ok >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message >>>>> > content and headers valid >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 >>>>> > appended to unit push list >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for >>>>> `127.0.0.1'. >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push >>>>> message >>>>> > accepted for processing >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session >>>>> service >>>>> > request >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push >>>>> accepted >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to >>>>> OTA >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area >>>>> 0x810aba8. >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for >>>>> `127.0.0.1'. >>>>> >>>>> please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to >>>>> persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they >>>>> recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. >>>>> >>>>> So please forward it to the list. >>>>> >>>>> Stipe >>>>> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> --- >>>>> Wapme Systems AG >>>>> >>>>> Vogelsanger Weg 80 >>>>> 40470 Düsseldorf >>>>> >>>>> Tel: +49-211-74845-0 >>>>> Fax: +49-211-74845-299 >>>>> >>>>> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de >>>>> --- >>>>> wapme.net - wherever you are >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > >
Re: [Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
I wonder if the problem may be related to the one with sending wap push on siemens modems - some DCS flags? szymon Szymon Stasik wrote: > I can try falcom A1 tommorow (and maybe siemens as well...). However in > the meantime I have found that this is not a kannel specific problem but > rather siemens specific. The same problem exists while using some Nokia > PPG (Artus?) software to send wap push to a siemens m50/me45. > > Anyway I'll try to investigate it since It is very important to me to > have wap push working on siemens and I would be glad to use kannel for it. > > so I am looking now for any hints regarding some bugs in siemens' wap > push decoding. > > regards, > > szymon > > Aarno Syvänen wrote: > >> can you use siemens as a modem ? Then logs would be more revealing. >> >> Aarno >> >> On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: >> >>> >>> kannel.log is only (with log-level 0): >>> >>> 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [16] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox >>> 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: smscconn_sender >>> (CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9971:test_ae): sending message >>> 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store >>> >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Szymon >>> >>> Aarno Syvänen wrote: >>> >>>> And the bearerbox log ? >>>> Aarno >>>> On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: >>>> >>>>> my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> Original Message >>>>> Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens >>>>> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 >>>>> From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Organization: Wapme Systems AG >>>>> To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>>> Szymon Stasik wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: >>>>> > >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for >>>>> `127.0.0.1'. >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request >>>>> > from <127.0.0.1> >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart >>>>> > accepted >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, >>>>> accepted >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic >>>>> analysis >>>>> > for address type a phone number >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control >>>>> > entity compiled ok >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message >>>>> > content and headers valid >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 >>>>> > appended to unit push list >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for >>>>> `127.0.0.1'. >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push >>>>> message >>>>> > accepted for processing >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session >>>>> service >>>>> > request >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push >>>>> accepted >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to >>>>> OTA >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area >>>>> 0x810aba8. >>>>> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for >>>>> `127.0.0.1'. >>>>> >>>>> please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to >>>>> persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they >>>>> recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. >>>>> >>>>> So please forward it to the list. >>>>> >>>>> Stipe >>>>> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> --- >>>>> Wapme Systems AG >>>>> >>>>> Vogelsanger Weg 80 >>>>> 40470 Düsseldorf >>>>> >>>>> Tel: +49-211-74845-0 >>>>> Fax: +49-211-74845-299 >>>>> >>>>> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de >>>>> --- >>>>> wapme.net - wherever you are >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > >
Re: [Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
I can try falcom A1 tommorow (and maybe siemens as well...). However in the meantime I have found that this is not a kannel specific problem but rather siemens specific. The same problem exists while using some Nokia PPG (Artus?) software to send wap push to a siemens m50/me45. Anyway I'll try to investigate it since It is very important to me to have wap push working on siemens and I would be glad to use kannel for it. so I am looking now for any hints regarding some bugs in siemens' wap push decoding. regards, szymon Aarno Syvänen wrote: can you use siemens as a modem ? Then logs would be more revealing. Aarno On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: kannel.log is only (with log-level 0): 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [16] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: smscconn_sender (CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9971:test_ae): sending message 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store regards, Szymon Aarno Syvänen wrote: And the bearerbox log ? Aarno On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. Original Message Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Wapme Systems AG To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szymon Stasik wrote: > > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: > > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request > from <127.0.0.1> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart > accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis > for address type a phone number > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control > entity compiled ok > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message > content and headers valid > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 > appended to unit push list > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push message > accepted for processing > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session service > request > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to OTA > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x810aba8. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. So please forward it to the list. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: [Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
can you use siemens as a modem ? Then logs would be more revealing. Aarno On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: kannel.log is only (with log-level 0): 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [16] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: smscconn_sender (CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9971:test_ae): sending message 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store regards, Szymon Aarno Syvänen wrote: And the bearerbox log ? Aarno On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. Original Message Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Wapme Systems AG To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szymon Stasik wrote: > > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: > > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request > from <127.0.0.1> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart > accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis > for address type a phone number > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control > entity compiled ok > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message > content and headers valid > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 > appended to unit push list > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push message > accepted for processing > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session service > request > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to OTA > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x810aba8. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. So please forward it to the list. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: [Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
And the bearerbox log ? Aarno On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. Original Message Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Wapme Systems AG To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szymon Stasik wrote: > > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: > > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request > from <127.0.0.1> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart > accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis > for address type a phone number > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control > entity compiled ok > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message > content and headers valid > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 > appended to unit push list > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push message > accepted for processing > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session service > request > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to OTA > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x810aba8. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. So please forward it to the list. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: [Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
kannel.log is only (with log-level 0): 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [16] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: smscconn_sender (CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9971:test_ae): sending message 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store regards, Szymon Aarno Syvänen wrote: And the bearerbox log ? Aarno On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. Original Message Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Wapme Systems AG To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szymon Stasik wrote: > > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: > > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request > from <127.0.0.1> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart > accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis > for address type a phone number > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control > entity compiled ok > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message > content and headers valid > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 > appended to unit push list > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push message > accepted for processing > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session service > request > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to OTA > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x810aba8. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. So please forward it to the list. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
[Fwd: Re: wap push receiving on siemens]
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list. Original Message Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Wapme Systems AG To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szymon Stasik wrote: > > wapbox.log looks faine - here it is: > > 2002-11-22 02:58:19 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request > from <127.0.0.1> > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart > accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: client address was <+48x>, accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis > for address type a phone number > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: using defaults instead of anys > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap control > entity compiled ok > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: transform_message: push message > content and headers valid > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: push machine 9 created > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: store_push_data: push machine 9 > appended to unit push list > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_push_response: telling pi > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: handle_push_message: push message > accepted for processing > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: event arrived > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [9] DEBUG: OTA: made connectionless session service > request > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: Connectionless push accepted > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [2] DEBUG: WSP_UNIT: delivering to wdp > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: OTA request for unit push > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] INFO: PPG: unconfirmed push delivered to OTA > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [14] DEBUG: PPG: destroying push machine 9 > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x810aba8. > 2002-11-22 02:58:20 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. please pass log snapshots allways to the mailing list and not to persons seperately. This way everyone can check them and quote if they recognize something that may point to the probelm itself. So please forward it to the list. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: wap push receiving on siemens
> I was trying also to (one by one): > > http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Content-length"); > http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Connection"); > http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Content-Type"); > http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Accept"); > > Content-Type cannot be removed for sure ;) > > Anyway - maybe it is something siemens-specific - it works on any other > phones and it looks that it is not a problem of some unneeded information can you pass us the wapbox.log snapshot of this?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Stipe Tolj wrote: in latest cvs snapshot gw/wap_push_ppg.c is the same as in 1.2.1. I've tried to do http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host"); // and http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "User-Agent") but it did not help much. I am stil receiving an empty body or few dots, (R) character in the middle and '*' at end. I am investigating the problem so any other ideas are welcome I was trying also to (one by one): http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Content-length"); http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Connection"); http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Content-Type"); http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Accept"); Content-Type cannot be removed for sure ;) Anyway - maybe it is something siemens-specific - it works on any other phones and it looks that it is not a problem of some unneeded information Szymon
Re: wap push receiving on siemens
> in latest cvs snapshot gw/wap_push_ppg.c is the same as in 1.2.1. I've > tried to do > > http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host"); // and > http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "User-Agent") > > but it did not help much. I am stil receiving an empty body or few dots, > (R) character in the middle and '*' at end. I am investigating the > problem so any other ideas are welcome maybe the Accept HTTP headers?! Aarno should know what's wrong here?! Aarno, could you point out what we have to fix. I haven't followed the thread very deeply. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Stipe Tolj wrote: Aarno Syvänen schrieb: Hello, there is a bug in ppg, it sends host header to the phone, even though this one is meaningful only for pi->ppg transaction. So can you add function call http_ header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host") into module gw/wap_push_ppg.c, into function pap_request thread, before test if (!headers_acceptable). in latest cvs snapshot gw/wap_push_ppg.c is the same as in 1.2.1. I've tried to do http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host"); // and http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "User-Agent") but it did not help much. I am stil receiving an empty body or few dots, (R) character in the middle and '*' at end. I am investigating the problem so any other ideas are welcome thanx, Szymon Aarno, has thos been fixed in cvs?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Aarno Syvänen schrieb: > > Hello, > > there is a bug in ppg, it sends host header to the phone, even though > this one > is meaningful only for pi->ppg transaction. So can you add function > call http_ > header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host") into module gw/wap_push_ppg.c, > into function pap_request thread, before test if (!headers_acceptable). Aarno, has thos been fixed in cvs?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Hello, there is a bug in ppg, it sends host header to the phone, even though this one is meaningful only for pi->ppg transaction. So can you add function call http_ header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host") into module gw/wap_push_ppg.c, into function pap_request thread, before test if (!headers_acceptable). Aarno On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:13 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote: Hello, I'm tring the wap push service with different phones. It works for me with all newer ericssons, nokia 3410, 6310, motorola v66, however I have a problem with siemens me45 and mt50 (same as m50). Kannel version is 1.2.0 the problem is that wap push message shows in sms inbos as data mesasge containing some strange characters ending with something like 'Host' header and sending user agent. While checking push settings in a phone - everyting seems to be ok - full access for receiving push messages. maybe someone have some test example that works with siemens? I am using folowing test (problem exists for both si and sl messages; all works for any other phones): $test_ppg -c si http://127.0.0.1:8181/cgi-bin/wap-push.cgi?username=***'&'password=*** si.xml pap.xml here is data http-posted to kannel: POST /cgi-bin/wap-push.cgi?username=***&password=*** HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:8181 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=asdlfkjiurwghasf; type="application/xml" X-WAP-Application-Id: http://www.efigence.com:* Content-Length: 1175 --asdlfkjiurwghasf Content-Type: application/xml "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/pap_1.0.dtd";> deliver-before-timestamp="2002-11-28T06:45:00Z" deliver-after-timestamp="2002-10-28T06:45:00Z" progress-notes-requested="false"> address-value="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> priority="low" delivery-method="unconfirmed" network-required="true" network="GSM" bearer-required="true" bearer="SMS"> --asdlfkjiurwghasf Content-Type: text/vnd.wap.si "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/si.dtd";> http://wap.sth.pl/test/g.wml"; si-id="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" action="signal-high" created="2002-10-28T15:23:15Z" si-expires="2002-11-28T00:00:00Z"> Some tested content --asdlfkjiurwghasf-- regards, Szymon
