Possible CAcert Assurance Event during FUDCon

2011-12-15 Thread Nick Bebout
I'm a CAcert assurer, and was wanting to check to see if there are any 
CAcert assurers who will be attending FUDCon and would be interested in 
offering CAcert assurances at some point during FUDCon.  If you are, 
please email me.  I'd like to get a group of assurers together at some 
point during the event.  This will be especially important because 
CAcert is getting ready to revoke the points that people obtained via 
the former Thawte Points Transfer system, so some people will be losing 
their assurer status (or 50 point status that lets you get your name in 
your certificates).


We are also planning a GPG/PGP key signing party, more details of that 
will come soon.


You can contact me at either n...@fedoraproject.org or n...@cacert.org

Thanks,

Nick

--
Nick Bebout
n...@cacert.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews

2011-12-15 Thread Brendan Jones

On 12/15/2011 09:57 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:

On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:

Hello fellow devs,

I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be automatically gathered". Some of you even
wrote your own tools to do some of these things.




Hi Stan,

great idea. Will try to use this prior to any forthcoming reviews.

I find the most time consuming task in the review process is the license
check. I use a combination of find/head/grep commands to try and
determine if some of the source files have differing licenses to the
stated one in the spec. None of my methods guarantee 100% license
detection, given the sheer number of licenses out there, although if we
could consolidate all of the methods reviewers use for this we would
have a nifty tool indeed.

Not sure if this is something which should be part of this package or
another entirely?

regards,

Brendan


The guys on the packaging list enlightened me on the existence of 
licensecheck from rpmdevtools. From my brief tests it does a good job 
but have not used it against cornercases

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

physfs 2.0.2

2011-12-15 Thread Tom Callaway
I've updated physfs to v2 (2.0.2) in rawhide. It is backwards compatible
with physfs v1, and I've already done local test rebuilds to confirm that.

I have a chain-build running to rebuild all the packages that need it to
avoid broken deps, but if I miss one, you should simply be able to
increment Release and rebuild to resolve it.

~tom

==
Fedora Project
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews

2011-12-15 Thread Brendan Jones

On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:

Hello fellow devs,

I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be automatically gathered". Some of you even
wrote your own tools to do some of these things.




Hi Stan,

great idea. Will try to use this prior to any forthcoming reviews.

I find the most time consuming task in the review process is the license 
check. I use a combination of find/head/grep commands to try and 
determine if some of the source files have differing licenses to the 
stated one in the spec. None of my methods guarantee 100% license 
detection, given the sheer number of licenses out there, although if we 
could consolidate all of the methods reviewers use for this we would 
have a nifty tool indeed.


Not sure if this is something which should be part of this package or 
another entirely?


regards,

Brendan


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: evolution-data-server 3.3.3 soname version bump in rawhide

2011-12-15 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 08:22 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Could you provide a list of the dependent packages that you don't have
> commit rights to, so we can organize a provenpackager to help handle it?

Hi,
I know this is not the right procedure, but can I provide it "after it
breaks", please? I've a little mess in what is still active and what
not, thus I get the list by the broken deps messages, which is more
accurate than my outdated records. I'm sorry for that.

I'm currently receiving broken deps for only two packages from the last
soname bump of eds in rawhide, one is syncevolution, to which I have
commit rights, but the issue is something with linking after its update
to newer version - I didn't follow the error closely. The other is
gnome-python2-desktop, to which I do not have commit rights. I do not
have commit rights to others too, but owners are forgiving to me and
usually rebuild their packages on their own.
Bye,
Milan

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Heads-up: GIMP 2.7/2.8 in Rawhide, license change to (L)GPLv3+

2011-12-15 Thread Nils Philippsen
Hi,

I just finished with the Fedora 17 feature page for GIMP 2.8[1] and
built gimp-2.7.4 into Rawhide.

GIMP changed its licensing to GPLv3+ (app, included plugins) and LGPLv3+
(libraries) from the 2.7 development versions on. I've checked dependent
packages and found that all are listed with compatible licenses in their
spec files (CeCill v2, GPLv2+, GPLv3+, Public Domain). One minor
licensing issues was introduced with this change, namely with poppler,
used for importing PDFs and GPLv2 only. For the moment, GIMP packages
from 2.7.x on won't use poppler, but the PostScript plugin for importing
PDFs. This is a workaround until the next stable version poppler 0.20
which will be based off xpdf-3.03 (or later), thusly GPLv2/GPLv3
dual-licensed and compatible again.

While APIs used by external plugins should be backwards-compatible, I'll
rebuild packages using GIMP libraries (i.e. having GIMP plugins) against
the current (not yet stable) version 2.7.4 and against the stable
version when it's there, just to be on the safe side. These are the
affected (source) packages:

GREYCstoration: deebs
gimp-fourier-plugin: fabiand
gimp-lqr-plugin: slankes
gimp-resynthesizer: ewan
gimpfx-foundry: rvinyard
gutenprint: twaugh - jpopelka
mathmap: rnorwood
ufraw: nphilipp
xsane: nphilipp

I plan to do the first round of rebuilds tomorrow, so if there's any
reason why I shouldn't rebuild one of these, or you want to rebuild a
package by yourself, speak up ;-).

Nils

[1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GIMP_2.8
-- 
Nils Philippsen  "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat   a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
n...@redhat.com   nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review swaps

2011-12-15 Thread Brendan Jones
I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so 
feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767583
python-poppler-qt4 - Qt4 poppler bindings

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270
lv2-ams-plugins - LV2 port of the Alsa Modular Synth modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766154
lv2-kn0ck0ut - An LV2 spectral subtraction plugin (linux audio)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754004
lv2-abGate - an LV2 Noise Gate plugin

I will be able to commence reviews from next Wednesday, unless anyone 
anyone responds this evening.


Thanks!

Brendan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-Mail-GnuPG/f15: 3/3] Merge cleanup.

2011-12-15 Thread corsepiu
commit 47fc27c758176d1068e85d18ee5102b9f5585dad
Author: Ralf Corsépius 
Date:   Thu Dec 15 18:49:54 2011 +0100

Merge cleanup.

 perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec |3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec b/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec
index d23302e..211d435 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec
@@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ GPG_PRESET_PASSPHRASE=/usr/libexec/gpg-preset-passphrase 
./Build test
 * Thu Dec 15 2011 Ralf Corsépius < corse...@fedoraproject.org> - 0.17-1
 - Upstream update.
 
-* Tue Jul 19 2011 Petr Sabata  - 0.16-3
-- Perl mass rebuild
-
 * Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 0.16-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Mail-GnuPG/f15] (3 commits) ...Merge cleanup.

2011-12-15 Thread corsepiu
Summary of changes:

  c6e0116... Perl mass rebuild (*)
  c1fdfb9... Upstream update. (*)
  47fc27c... Merge cleanup.

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Mail-GnuPG/f16] Upstream update.

2011-12-15 Thread corsepiu
Summary of changes:

  c1fdfb9... Upstream update. (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Mail-GnuPG] Upstream update.

2011-12-15 Thread corsepiu
commit c1fdfb9de46baf6ffd4b680beca0e2a24dc30c58
Author: Ralf Corsépius 
Date:   Thu Dec 15 18:30:27 2011 +0100

Upstream update.

 .gitignore   |3 +--
 perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec |   12 +---
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3e102d7..9cbc8f7 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-Mail-GnuPG-0.15.tar.gz
-/Mail-GnuPG-0.16.tar.gz
+/Mail-GnuPG-0.17.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec b/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec
index ef67c27..d23302e 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-GnuPG.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 Name:  perl-Mail-GnuPG
 Summary:   Process email with GPG
-Version:   0.16
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   0.17
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   GPLv2 or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-GnuPG/
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch: noarch
 
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo 
$version))
@@ -36,15 +35,11 @@ mv README~ README
 ./Build
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 ./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \;
 
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
 %check
 GPG_PRESET_PASSPHRASE=/usr/libexec/gpg-preset-passphrase ./Build test
 
@@ -55,6 +50,9 @@ GPG_PRESET_PASSPHRASE=/usr/libexec/gpg-preset-passphrase 
./Build test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Dec 15 2011 Ralf Corsépius < corse...@fedoraproject.org> - 0.17-1
+- Upstream update.
+
 * Tue Jul 19 2011 Petr Sabata  - 0.16-3
 - Perl mass rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 9bc6a84..4d2ac6b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ab13896e4410563c2c4f92f7de6684ae  Mail-GnuPG-0.16.tar.gz
+b6c94307bcac31a4f6c7a47aa8065bd9  Mail-GnuPG-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Mail-GnuPG-0.17.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by corsepiu

2011-12-15 Thread corsepiu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mail-GnuPG:

b6c94307bcac31a4f6c7a47aa8065bd9  Mail-GnuPG-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Systemd unit file alias question

2011-12-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 21.11.11 15:37, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:

> I'm working on improving how akmods are built and had an idea[1] I
> need input/confirmation on.
> 
> Instead of the akmods packaging assuming when it needs to run, why
> can't each akmod driver package provide it's own unit file?
> 
> Since the service would run as type "oneshot", am I correct in
> assuming that no matter how many times it's started, it will only
> start for real on the first (earliest) occurrence?

No, it will start whenever somebody requests it and it isn't already
running on Type=oneshot. However, if you combine this with
RemainAfterExit=yes you get the desired behaviour.

> My idea is that each akmod driver package would provide a service file
> with the same name as the package but include an alias to
> "akmods.service".

Not sure I understand this. Note that systemd will not allow aliases to
be mapped to multiple units at the same time.

> What's the consequences of multiple unit files claiming the same
> alias? Is this safe?

The first one will win, the others will result in an error message to be
printed and ignored. 

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: evolution-data-server 3.3.3 soname version bump in rawhide

2011-12-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:47 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
>   Hi,
> just a note that the upcoming release of evolution-data-server 3.3.3
> contains soname version bumps for libcamel and libedatacal, as of today.
> The release is planned for the next week.
> 
> I'll rebuild broken deps packages the next day after the update lands to
> the rawhide, at least those I've commit rights to (it'll be definitely
> sooner than the last time).
>   Bye,
>   Milan


Could you provide a list of the dependent packages that you don't have
commit rights to, so we can organize a provenpackager to help handle it?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Native systemd unit for tsm client

2011-12-15 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson

On 12/15/2011 11:48 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:

If dsmcad is indeed forking, the type is correct. Don't lie to systemd.
If dsmcad indeed creates no PID file, it's correct to not have the PIDFile= 
entry.
If the main PID guessing can go wrong (for double-forking daemons that can 
happen),
GuessMainPID=no is the right option to set.
I see nothing wrong with that.


I stand corrected and on top that for some weird reason the unit similar 
to what he was using works now


[Unit]
Description=Tivoly Storage Manager Client
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=forking
Environment=DSM_LOG=/var/log/tsm
ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad
GuessMainPID=no

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

# systemctl start tsm-client.service && systemctl status 
tsm-client.service && ps aux | grep dsmcad && netstat -pant | grep dsmcad

tsm-client.service - Tivoly Storage Manager Client
  Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tsm-client.service; disabled)
  Active: active (running) since Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:08:32 +; 
7ms ago
 Process: 7723 ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/tsm-client.service
  ├ 7724 [dsmcad]
  └ 7726 /usr/bin/dsmcad
root  7726  0.0  0.1 310576  3044 ?Sl   12:08   0:00 
/usr/bin/dsmcad
root  7728  0.0  0.0 109240   884 pts/0S+   12:08   0:00 grep 
--color=auto dsmcad
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:1581
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  7726/dsmcad
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:56494   
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  7726/dsmcad


# systemctl stop tsm-client.service && systemctl status 
tsm-client.service && ps aux | grep dsmcad && netstat -pant | grep dsmcad

tsm-client.service - Tivoly Storage Manager Client
  Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tsm-client.service; disabled)
  Active: inactive (dead) since Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:09:53 +; 
8ms ago
 Process: 7723 ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/tsm-client.service

I cant explain why it did not work earlier this morning I guess blaming 
it on a lack of coffee is as an good excuse as any.


JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Native systemd unit for tsm client

2011-12-15 Thread Michal Schmidt
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Nope nothing odd with specifying Type=oneshot together with
> RemainAfterExit=yes

Well, it is really odd to spacify oneshot if the service is actually a daemon.

> # systemctl start tsm-client.service && systemctl status
> tsm-client.service && ps aux | grep dsmcad && netstat -pant | grep
> dsmcad
> tsm-client.service - Tivoly Storage Manager Client
>Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tsm-client.service;
>disabled)
>Active: active (exited) since Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:53:08 +;
>8s ago
>   Process: 7312 ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad (code=exited,
> status=0/SUCCESS)
>CGroup: name=systemd:/system/tsm-client.service
>└ 7315 /usr/bin/dsmcad

Notice the not-quite correct "active (exited)" state.
If PID 7315 dies unexpectedly, your service would still show up as active.

> You have Type=forking and GuessMainPID=no without having PIDFile=
> entry
> 
> The above seem odd to me about the unit file you are using

If dsmcad is indeed forking, the type is correct. Don't lie to systemd.
If dsmcad indeed creates no PID file, it's correct to not have the PIDFile= 
entry.
If the main PID guessing can go wrong (for double-forking daemons that can 
happen),
GuessMainPID=no is the right option to set.
I see nothing wrong with that.

Michal
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

octave-specfun: license change from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas Sailer
I'd like to push octave-specfun v1.1.0 to rawhide; octave-specfun
changes the license from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+.

The only package that depends on octave-specfun in the repository that I
am aware of is octave-signal, and that is already GPLv3+.

Are there any objections?

Thanks,
Tom


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

evolution-data-server 3.3.3 soname version bump in rawhide

2011-12-15 Thread Milan Crha
Hi,
just a note that the upcoming release of evolution-data-server 3.3.3
contains soname version bumps for libcamel and libedatacal, as of today.
The release is planned for the next week.

I'll rebuild broken deps packages the next day after the update lands to
the rawhide, at least those I've commit rights to (it'll be definitely
sooner than the last time).
Bye,
Milan

___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20111215 changes

2011-12-15 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Dec 15 08:15:05 UTC 2011

Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-libs-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so
OpenGTL-libs-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
banshee-2.2.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires mono(gudev-sharp) = 0:1.0.0.0
boinc-manager-6.12.35-1.r24014svn.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libxcb-atom.so.1()(64bit)
comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-18.noarch requires comoonics-base-py
comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-24.noarch requires comoonics-base-py

compiz-0.9.5.92.1-0.1.gite676f1b12eb8db3a76978eed5bfc7c2cf9a0b6ce.fc17.i686 
requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0

compiz-0.9.5.92.1-0.1.gite676f1b12eb8db3a76978eed5bfc7c2cf9a0b6ce.fc17.x86_64 
requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
compiz-fusion-extras-0.9.5.92-1.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
compiz-fusion-unsupported-0.9.4-6.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)

compiz-gtk-0.9.5.92.1-0.1.gite676f1b12eb8db3a76978eed5bfc7c2cf9a0b6ce.fc17.x86_64
 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)

compiz-kde-0.9.5.92.1-0.1.gite676f1b12eb8db3a76978eed5bfc7c2cf9a0b6ce.fc17.x86_64
 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.5.92-1.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1
contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit)
couchdb-1.0.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.46()(64bit)
couchdb-1.0.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.46()(64bit)
couchdb-1.0.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libicudata.so.46()(64bit)
curry-0.9.11-7.fc12.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
ekg2-xosd-0.2-0.17.rc1.fc16.x86_64 requires libxosd.so.2()(64bit)
firefox-8.0-3.fc17.x86_64 requires gecko-libs(x86-64) = 0:8.0
fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit)
fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit)
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.7-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.2-1.fc17
gcc-python2-plugin-0.7-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.2-1.fc17
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.7-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.2-1.fc17
gcc-python3-plugin-0.7-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.2-1.fc17
gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
gnome-genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
gnome-python2-evolution-2.32.0-6.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libebook-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
gphpedit-0.9.95-0.2.20090209snap.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libgtkhtml-2.so.0()(64bit)
gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires libmapnik.so.0.7()(64bit)
gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libgdl-1.so.3()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libchamplain-gtk-0.6.so.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.6.so.0()(64bit)
gscribble-0.1.2-1.fc16.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2
gstreamer-java-swt-1.5-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libswt3-gtk2
hamlib-1.2.14-2.fc17.i686 requires libusrp-3.4.2.so.0
hamlib-1.2.14-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libusrp-3.4.2.so.0()(64bit)
hosts3d-1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libglfw.so.2.6()(64bit)
hosts3d-sampler-1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libglfw.so.2.6()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-property.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-keysyms.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-icccm.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-event.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-aux.so.0()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-atom.so.1()(64bit)
intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-12.fc15.x86_64 requires commons-collections
kde-partitionmanager-1.0.3-2.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libparted.so.0()(64bit)
6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires superkaramba >= 0:4.7.90
6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires kremotecontro

Re: Fedora 16 for IBM System z 64bit official release

2011-12-15 Thread Lucélio Gomes de Freitas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Congratulations. I'm fan of this team.

Em 15-12-2011 09:02, Dan Horák escreveu:
> There was still a longer delay after the Fedora 16 release for the
> primary architectures than we would like to see, but at least we are
> faster than with Fedora 15 and so here we are.
>
> As today, the Fedora IBM System z (s390x) Secondary Arch team proudly
> presents the Fedora 16 for IBM System z 64bit official release!
>
> The links to the actual release are here:
>
> http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/16/Fedora/s390x/
>
> http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/16/Everything/s390x/os/
>
> and obviously on all mirrors that mirror the secondary arch content.
>
> The first directory contains the normal installation trees as well as
> one DVD ISO with the complete release.
>
> Everything as usual contains, well, everything. :)
>
>
> Additional information about known issues, the current progress and state
> for future release, where and how the team can be reached and just
> anything else IBM System z on Fedora related can be found here:
>
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x/16
> for architecture specific release notes
>
> and
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x
> for the general information.
>
>
> Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen!
>
>
> Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers
>

- -- 
Lucélio Gomes de Freitas
ETFCSF-> U.G.F.-> P.U.C.(RJ)
Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind).
Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com
Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk7p1vEACgkQENqGaHfBA/fmvAEAhFeD0aHjeCl8A/9aeeJaODIb
7FAmZCHnkzseFpg7DAYA/iAQz7PGK4WEQCZvNhImK/Berrrz//Oqp1XK8qZpcSEw
=XiTr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Native systemd unit for tsm client

2011-12-15 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson

 On 12/15/2011 10:38 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote:

2011/12/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":

Hum that unit file looks a bit odd to me and does not work with TSM 6.3 on
F16 atleast not here

Not sure what you mean by "a bit odd". Isn't specifying "oneshot"
together with "RemainAfterExit" more odd in this case, where a deamon
(dsmcad) in fact keeps running? Is it possible to stop it with your
unit file?

pe
Nope nothing odd with specifying Type=oneshot together with 
RemainAfterExit=yes however having RemainAfterExit with Type=forking or 
Type=simple would be odd


Starting the unit...

# systemctl start tsm-client.service && systemctl status 
tsm-client.service && ps aux | grep dsmcad && netstat -pant | grep dsmcad

tsm-client.service - Tivoly Storage Manager Client
  Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tsm-client.service; disabled)
  Active: active (exited) since Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:53:08 +; 8s ago
 Process: 7312 ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/tsm-client.service
  └ 7315 /usr/bin/dsmcad
root  7315  0.0  0.2 318976  4100 ?Sl   10:53   0:00 
/usr/bin/dsmcad
root  7325  0.0  0.0 109240   888 pts/0S+   10:53   0:00 grep 
--color=auto dsmcad
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:51833   
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  7315/dsmcad
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:1581
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  7315/dsmcad


Stopping the unit

# systemctl stop tsm-client.service && systemctl status 
tsm-client.service && ps aux | grep dsmcad && netstat -pant | grep dsmcad

tsm-client.service - Tivoly Storage Manager Client
  Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tsm-client.service; disabled)
  Active: inactive (dead) since Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:55:52 +; 
6ms ago
 Process: 7312 ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/tsm-client.service


From where I'm standing I would consider that startup and shutdown of 
the unit as clean as it gets...




The one I posted works with 6.2.2 on Fedora 16 x86_64. The only "odd"
thing might be  that it doesn't use the pid file but cgroups to
control the daemon - which is a good thing anyway.


Why are you ignoring exit code of the start command which would 
otherwise normally be considered a failure?

There is no need for this line StandardOutput=syslog it's the default
You have Type=forking and GuessMainPID=no without having PIDFile= entry

The above seem odd to me about the unit file you are using

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora 16 for IBM System z 64bit official release

2011-12-15 Thread Dan Horák
There was still a longer delay after the Fedora 16 release for the
primary architectures than we would like to see, but at least we are
faster than with Fedora 15 and so here we are. 

As today, the Fedora IBM System z (s390x) Secondary Arch team proudly 
presents the Fedora 16 for IBM System z 64bit official release!

The links to the actual release are here:

http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/16/Fedora/s390x/

http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/16/Everything/s390x/os/

and obviously on all mirrors that mirror the secondary arch content.

The first directory contains the normal installation trees as well as
one DVD ISO with the complete release.

Everything as usual contains, well, everything. :)


Additional information about known issues, the current progress and state
for future release, where and how the team can be reached and just 
anything else IBM System z on Fedora related can be found here:


http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x/16
for architecture specific release notes

and 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x
for the general information.


Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen!


Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers

-- 
Dan Horák, RHCE
Senior Software Engineer, BaseOS

Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Native systemd unit for tsm client

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas Moschny
2011/12/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> Hum that unit file looks a bit odd to me and does not work with TSM 6.3 on
> F16 atleast not here

Not sure what you mean by "a bit odd". Isn't specifying "oneshot"
together with "RemainAfterExit" more odd in this case, where a deamon
(dsmcad) in fact keeps running? Is it possible to stop it with your
unit file?

The one I posted works with 6.2.2 on Fedora 16 x86_64. The only "odd"
thing might be  that it doesn't use the pid file but cgroups to
control the daemon - which is a good thing anyway.

- Thomas
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Native systemd unit for tsm client

2011-12-15 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson

On 12/15/2011 09:08 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote:

Why are you starting dsmc explicitly - isn't it started by dsmcad?



You are right not worry about "dsmc sched" as dsmcad will call dsmc 
sched and also control the webclient portion so you can just drop that line.


Probably a nasty habit from I picked up from the past throwing it in 
there...


### tsm-client.service ###

[Unit]
Description=Tivoly Storage Manager Client
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=oneshot
Environment=DSM_LOG=/var/log/tsm
ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad
RemainAfterExit=yes

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target




Here's what we've been using:

[Unit]
Description=DSM Client Acceptor
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=forking
ExecStart=-/usr/bin/dsmcad -errorlogname=/var/log/dsmerror.log
Environment=LANG=en_US
StandardOutput=syslog
GuessMainPID=no

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

For some reason the PID guessing does not work, so we force it to use cgroups.


Hum that unit file looks a bit odd to me and does not work with TSM 6.3 
on F16 atleast not here anywho the IBM guys/gal will probably come up 
eventually with the official and "correct" unit for their client when 
RHEL7 gets released and maybe stop polluting 64bit installs with 
dependency's on i386 but as you probably already know if wishes were 
horses we would all be eating steak...


JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Yum translation update request

2011-12-15 Thread Misha Shnurapet
Hi.

How's it going?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726878
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/trans/2011-December/009532.html

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Native systemd unit for tsm client

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas Moschny
Why are you starting dsmc explicitly - isn't it started by dsmcad?
Here's what we've been using:

[Unit]
Description=DSM Client Acceptor
After=network.target

[Service]
Type=forking
ExecStart=-/usr/bin/dsmcad -errorlogname=/var/log/dsmerror.log
Environment=LANG=en_US
StandardOutput=syslog
GuessMainPID=no

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

For some reason the PID guessing does not work, so we force it to use cgroups.

- Thomas


2011/12/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> Here's an native tsm client service for your fedora running
> workstation/server since it's probably going to be awhile before IBM catches
> up to systemd...
>
> ### tsm-client.service ###
>
> [Unit]
> Description=Tivoly Storage Manager Client
> After=network.target
>
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> Environment=DSM_LOG=/var/log/tsm
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/dsmcad
> ExecStart=/bin/bash -c "exec /usr/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 &"
> RemainAfterExit=yes
>
> [Install]
> WantedBy=multi-user.target
>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rubygem-bcrypt-ruby license change

2011-12-15 Thread Vít Ondruch

Hi,

rubygem-bcrypt-ruby has changed its license from "BSD with advertising 
and MIT" to "MIT and Public Domain and ISC" due to changes in its 
internal C implementation.


Cheers,


Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel