Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM
Thank Michel, I will be reducing my involvement in packaging LLVM -- I am no longer regularly using it, the work required to keep it up-to-date is relatively straightforward, but there are several deficiencies that I feel others are better positioned to address: I am happy to help maintain package for now as a comaintainer at least. I am not really a llvm/clang user either - my main motivation for using/fixing it so far is that ghc uses llvm as a backend on ARM. Let me know if you're interested, and I'll release the package then. I think it would be best if someone who is actively using llvm and clang directly and familiar with it and upstream maintained the package but if noone wants to maintain it right now I can help to maintain it for the time being at least. Thanks for Michel for maintaining it for a long time. Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said: On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 Bill Nottingham wrote: snip Removing: notification-daemon clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and probably Cinnamon as well) uses something different, XFCE has its own, gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could probably switch to one of the alternatives? Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification daemon; Pierre-Yves can say for sure. gnome-session looks obsolete, and the nodoka theme could obviously be removed with it. Christoph may be able to speak to what LXDE could do with an alternate notification daemon, but he's travelling at least today. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 915235] New: perl-Test-Compile-0.24 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915235 Bug ID: 915235 Summary: perl-Test-Compile-0.24 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Compile Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.24 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.23 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Compile/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=riQjDPsGK2a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915236] New: perl-Test-Strict-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915236 Bug ID: 915236 Summary: perl-Test-Strict-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Strict Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.20 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.19 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Strict/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RRQlnODBGwa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/02/13 13:06, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:49:49AM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned shared objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are still using static linking, so we appear to be the only ones attempting to package LLVM properly. - - Dealing with Clang breaking when GCC is updated, and compatibility issues with secondary architectures Thanks to Jens for doing the 3.2 update -- and others who've been contributing packaging patches. Let me know if you're interested, and I'll release the package then. I've never looked at llvm internals before, but it would be a fun challenge for me. I can take it up if you're OK with things being broken occasionally while I figure things out. Of course, if someone else who has a clue wants to take it up, I'd like it if I could co-maintain. Given that Mesa depends on LLVM, I suppose brokenness in anything but Rawhide is not really advisable. I'd be happy to give you and Jens co-maintainership though, until a more permanent maintainer steps forward (ideally one of those who have committed semi-regularly before). Thanks, - -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: sali...@fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRKy9PAAoJEEr1VKujapN6gQEIAJ8vvkM9JlTqojQ2Cpy4CEob 1PG3iFPTBEsDn8KWIQZpA63LWrKZwzydpo+I6ExIro+DWIkGqUdiXzGxAOmm820C vhnaQrZujFQo2O0Ns2NadlOCye+xSl/tqoqeqEVN8gdD8Gg0vFq2g8UC3lwUFJXP msj7vQoQ+55420h1cEbxnqBu5Dmx1szgHHtglTjZ7IKITo96ZdhHfQot2+fybSWP qturTdB7ePLL10xNmABtoLABgevMr21WmVdEWr/DSP3PYoq6caBjLw+ennGkXs9r JQVDLS55EjerClAPsN36RRXf5OOZ+9zew+1PuOr6Bk6l8VJzZFgLOU78xX49FNE= =HNPT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM
- Original Message - From: Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, 25 February, 2013 7:30:56 PM Subject: Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/02/13 13:06, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:49:49AM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned shared objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are still using static linking, so we appear to be the only ones attempting to package LLVM properly. - - Dealing with Clang breaking when GCC is updated, and compatibility issues with secondary architectures Thanks to Jens for doing the 3.2 update -- and others who've been contributing packaging patches. Let me know if you're interested, and I'll release the package then. I've never looked at llvm internals before, but it would be a fun challenge for me. I can take it up if you're OK with things being broken occasionally while I figure things out. Of course, if someone else who has a clue wants to take it up, I'd like it if I could co-maintain. Given that Mesa depends on LLVM, I suppose brokenness in anything but Rawhide is not really advisable. I'd be happy to give you and Jens co-maintainership though, until a more permanent maintainer steps forward (ideally one of those who have committed semi-regularly before). I expect myself, ajax or glisse need to step up to this, I'm probably worst choice at the moment, but I can at least find the time with juhp to the llvm/mesa lockstep updates. Dave. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
SCM request not quite complete?
Hi Jon (and list), I opened an SCM request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142 The master branch seems fine. I've cloned, imported and built nodejs-send for rawhide. However, I can't switch to f18 branch: $ fedpkg switch-branch f18 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch f18 The message on the bug report says: Complete, clearing flag. It turns out the SCM request may have been cancelled half-way or something: Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com has canceled Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org's request for fedora-cvs: Bug 910142: Review Request: nodejs-send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142 I didn't get any [pkgdb] emails about nodejs-send, but it is on pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/nodejs-send Not sure what happened here? -- Jamie Nguyen -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: SCM request not quite complete?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:07:10 +, Jamie Nguyen wrote: Hi Jon (and list), I opened an SCM request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142 The master branch seems fine. I've cloned, imported and built nodejs-send for rawhide. However, I can't switch to f18 branch: $ fedpkg switch-branch f18 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch f18 The message on the bug report says: Complete, clearing flag. It turns out the SCM request may have been cancelled half-way or something: Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com has canceled Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org's request for fedora-cvs: Bug 910142: Review Request: nodejs-send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142 I didn't get any [pkgdb] emails about nodejs-send, but it is on pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/nodejs-send Not sure what happened here? The requested branches have not been created as can also be seen in pkgdb and this pkgdb notification: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130225/965146.html You could simply reset fedora-cvs flag and re-request the missing branches. -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc0.git5.1.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.74 0.89 0.52 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: SCM request not quite complete?
On 25/02/13 10:38, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:07:10 +, Jamie Nguyen wrote: $ fedpkg switch-branch f18 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch f18 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com has canceled Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org's request for fedora-cvs: Bug 910142: Review Request: nodejs-send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142 Not sure what happened here? The requested branches have not been created as can also be seen in pkgdb and this pkgdb notification: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130225/965146.html You could simply reset fedora-cvs flag and re-request the missing branches. Sure, sounds good. Re-requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142#c8 Thanks. -- Jamie Nguyen -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/02/13 17:19, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package stow (orphan) comaintained by: salimma Unretired, thanks for the heads-up. The package is still up-to-date and the mass rebuild went fine. Regards, - -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: sali...@fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRK0bMAAoJEEr1VKujapN6XYIH/RIV/GNjf8C9XzNSt7yWGFA3 wxrx8tdLoIYd5VYuKSpT5QgWac02oAUuY0bBIDmHe7LrInTpJx7TGRdq9KyBzxq6 JAlIEZxnr2MJuWkhgtYNxRUv32gzQHuXB3RLVApqKzV5swIRhP016QfGE0YV29dp I51hDLrCnsHpOcS5czBJb/Jc3/wR57h8jaouZGzBUuiAfyXimDUl56N0kS46Rl0j TtXWd3HpK624H6D1RlXS3Bey63MCTHrf9CSvouPBob+Q/PtoFiPCMfzwZW3k9ps1 /joiJm5m1tgxfW+Xz+M1SIu8XLi0xNsQ4PnaVfgoQrDilJc9X014pdrY5aQS21w= =hPXv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said: On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 Bill Nottingham wrote: snip Removing: notification-daemon clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and probably Cinnamon as well) cinamon and gnome-shell are notification-daemons (cinamon should provide desktop-notification-daemon as well). uses something different, XFCE has its own, gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could probably switch to one of the alternatives? Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification daemon; It should just require desktop-notification-daemon then. Pierre-Yves can say for sure. gnome-session looks obsolete Yeah we should just remove the requires from gnome-session. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
Le dimanche 24 février 2013 11:19:43, Bill Nottingham a écrit : Package sdcc (orphan) Removing: sdcc ktechlab requires sdcc = 3.2.0-0.fc18 mcu8051ide requires sdcc = 3.2.0-0.fc18 I have pickep up sddc, comainteners welcome! Regards, Alain -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Most buggy packages
Hi, since we opened the question of the most buggy applications I would like to introduce you the Fedora crash statistics generated from ABRT reports. It actually doesn't show the most buggy applications, but the number of crashes per application encountered by users in some period of time: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/hot/ The goal of this project is to help developers to prioritize their work, so the most popular bugs gets the proper attention. --Jirka As an example, this has 3000 counted crashes (just 1500 on the overview page, maybe a bug): https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/20295/ but the bugzilla itself has just 22 people CC'd. Even worse for this one: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/57483/ 3000 counted crashes, but 11 people CC'd. Are you going to let bugzilla maintainers know somehow? I would assume that once the crash count surpasses a certain threshold, you could add a comment to the bugzilla report: This has crashed for 100 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1000 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1 users, see [FAF URL] for details. Honestly, if you don't inform the bugzilla maintainers somehow, most of them will never learn of FAF. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Most buggy packages
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: Are you going to let bugzilla maintainers know somehow? I would assume that once the crash count surpasses a certain threshold, you could add a comment to the bugzilla report: This has crashed for 100 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1000 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1 users, see [FAF URL] for details. Honestly, if you don't inform the bugzilla maintainers somehow, most of them will never learn of FAF. +1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 12:35 +0100, drago01 wrote: uses something different, XFCE has its own, gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could probably switch to one of the alternatives? Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification daemon; It should just require desktop-notification-daemon then. Rawhide updated and building. For the record, Guake is pretty much dead upstream... Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-shell segfaults with @updates-testing/F18
Ah, that's a weird bug then :) So maybe we have to avoid shared-mime-info to get into stable until we find the solution because the update process will hit everybody. I'll subscribe into the list that you mentioned and write there about the problem. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Most buggy packages
On 02/25/2013 12:53 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: Hi, since we opened the question of the most buggy applications I would like to introduce you the Fedora crash statistics generated from ABRT reports. It actually doesn't show the most buggy applications, but the number of crashes per application encountered by users in some period of time: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/hot/ The goal of this project is to help developers to prioritize their work, so the most popular bugs gets the proper attention. --Jirka As an example, this has 3000 counted crashes (just 1500 on the overview page, maybe a bug): https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/20295/ but the bugzilla itself has just 22 people CC'd. Even worse for this one: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/57483/ 3000 counted crashes, but 11 people CC'd. Are you going to let bugzilla maintainers know somehow? I would assume that once the crash count surpasses a certain threshold, you could add a comment to the bugzilla report: This has crashed for 100 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1000 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1 users, see [FAF URL] for details. Honestly, if you don't inform the bugzilla maintainers somehow, most of them will never learn of FAF. - this feature is just being added as we speak :) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Most buggy packages
Are you going to let bugzilla maintainers know somehow? I would assume that once the crash count surpasses a certain threshold, you could add a comment to the bugzilla report: This has crashed for 100 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1000 users, see [FAF URL] for details. This has crashed for 1 users, see [FAF URL] for details. Honestly, if you don't inform the bugzilla maintainers somehow, most of them will never learn of FAF. - this feature is just being added as we speak :) Amazing! Thumbs up. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki
On 02/15/2013 05:11 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Ping. I'd like to finish up the NRM process. What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac ticket? The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a month now. My FAS name is mooninite and I have been awaiting the commit ACL for just as long. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
SWAT will be removed from the Samba package
Hello, the Samba Team has announced [1] that it will remove SWAT from the Samba Suite. SWAT is unmaintained and has the most security bugs. I plan to remove the samba-swat subpackage in Fedora 18, 19 and rawhide as soon as it gets removed from the current Samba development tree. Cheers, -- andreas -- Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: 8B7EB4B8 Red Hat a...@redhat.com Samba Team a...@samba.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 04:38 -0500, David Airlie wrote: Given that Mesa depends on LLVM, I suppose brokenness in anything but Rawhide is not really advisable. I'd be happy to give you and Jens co-maintainership though, until a more permanent maintainer steps forward (ideally one of those who have committed semi-regularly before). I expect myself, ajax or glisse need to step up to this, I'm probably worst choice at the moment, but I can at least find the time with juhp to the llvm/mesa lockstep updates. Yeah, I can take this on. I will caution that most bugs in any of the language frontends are probably just going to be immediately moved to upstream, and I'm mostly going to lean on the secondary arch maintainers for arch-specific bugs. (And that I am absolutely _not_ owning it in EPEL or RHEL, though if someone else wants to I'm happy to advise.) But other than that, sure, why not. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
system freezes after loading gdm/gnome
Hi, I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested after a reboot. The problem is that I don't get any logs and running startx with exec gnome-session in .xinitrc leads to the exactly same problem. Interestingly, if I run just gnome-terminal from my .xinitrc, close it and then re-run with full gnome-session, I get the shell and everything seems to work. Well, except it is somewhat sluggish, suggesting some hidden breakage. Any advices? Best regards, Jan Dvorak -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: system freezes after loading gdm/gnome
I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested after a reboot. Do you see a blue screen when it freezes? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: system freezes after loading gdm/gnome
As usual, I have completely forgotten any relevant system/software info, so: This is a Thinkpad T420 with: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) dmesg says: [4.748523] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [4.795277] [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M [4.795305] fb: conflicting fb hw usage inteldrmfb vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver [4.798409] i915 :00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64 [4.895473] i915 :00:02.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [4.895881] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010). [4.895883] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [5.015197] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device [5.871902] i915 :00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device [5.871904] i915 :00:02.0: registered panic notifier [6.055590] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 [6.721223] [drm] Enabling RC6 states: RC6 on, RC6p off, RC6pp off The Xorg.0.log is attached as well as `rpm -qa` output. The system was originally F18, but I decided to upgrade to rawhide. I am going to try clean rawhide install on another LV. Ozan Çağlayan ozan...@gmail.com wrote: Do you see a blue screen when it freezes? No, not really. Just a black screen, possibly with the frozen cursor if it manages to show up at all. Best regards, Jan Dvorak [ 1658.461] This is a pre-release version of the X server from Fedora Project. It is not supported in any way. Bugs may be filed in the bugzilla at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/. Select the xorg product for bugs you find in this release. Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions please check the latest version in the X.Org Foundation git repository. See http://wiki.x.org/wiki/GitPage for git access instructions. [ 1658.461] X.Org X Server 1.13.99.902 (1.14.0 RC 2) Release Date: 2013-02-12 [ 1658.462] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 [ 1658.462] Build Operating System: 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 [ 1658.462] Current Operating System: Linux gesher 3.9.0-0.rc0.git5.1.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 22 16:35:19 UTC 2013 x86_64 [ 1658.463] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.9.0-0.rc0.git5.1.fc19.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/vg_gesher-lv_f18 ro rd.lvm.lv=vg_gesher/lv_f18 rd.luks.uuid=luks-0c396465-352d-4565-96ca-fcd01424c74c rd.dm=0 rd.lvm.lv=vg_gesher/lv_swap rd.md=0 rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8 [ 1658.463] Build Date: 15 February 2013 01:36:06AM [ 1658.463] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.13.99.902-1.20130215.fc19 [ 1658.463] Current version of pixman: 0.28.0 [ 1658.463] Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. [ 1658.463] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. [ 1658.464] (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Mon Feb 25 15:26:54 2013 [ 1658.466] (==) Using config directory: /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d [ 1658.466] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d [ 1658.466] (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section. [ 1658.466] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults. [ 1658.467] (**) |--Screen Default Screen Section (0) [ 1658.467] (**) | |--Monitor default monitor [ 1658.467] (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen Section. Using a default monitor configuration. [ 1658.467] (**) Option DontZap false [ 1658.467] (==) Automatically adding devices [ 1658.467] (==) Automatically enabling devices [ 1658.467] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices [ 1658.467] (==) FontPath set to: catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d, built-ins [ 1658.467] (==) ModulePath set to /usr/lib64/xorg/modules [ 1658.467] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input devices. If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices. [ 1658.467] (II) Loader magic: 0x7fece0 [ 1658.467] (II) Module ABI versions: [ 1658.467] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 [ 1658.468] X.Org Video Driver: 14.1 [ 1658.468] X.Org XInput driver : 19.1 [ 1658.468] X.Org Server Extension : 7.0 [ 1658.469] (II) config/udev: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) [ 1658.478] (--) PCI:*(0:0:2:0) 8086:0126:17aa:21d0 rev 9, Mem @ 0xf000/4194304, 0xe000/268435456, I/O @ 0x4000/64, BIOS @ 0x/131072 [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension Generic Event Extension [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension SHAPE [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension XTEST [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension BIG-REQUESTS [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension SYNC [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD [ 1658.478] Initializing built-in extension XC-MISC [
Re: system freezes after loading gdm/gnome
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 15:26 +0100, Jan Dvořák wrote: Hi, I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested after a reboot. Intel driver? I've seen those as well. Trying rolling back to the last update that included a new cogl and let us know whether that fixes it. The problem is that I don't get any logs and running startx with exec gnome-session in .xinitrc leads to the exactly same problem. Xorg -configure and move the generated xorg.conf file to /etc/X11 and change the intel driver to modesetting and it should be enough to at least get a graphical interface. Interestingly, if I run just gnome-terminal from my .xinitrc, close it and then re-run with full gnome-session, I get the shell and everything seems to work. Well, except it is somewhat sluggish, suggesting some hidden breakage. Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Test-Strict-0.20.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Strict: 99250df30f2805250ce25a485ad9a31f Test-Strict-0.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Strict] 0.20 bump
commit 58a2813a026fee8d6ef7b96d9f7664e88ef0e810
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 25 16:03:37 2013 +0100
0.20 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Test-Strict.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4989b2b..5f703ff 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ Test-Strict-0.13.tar.gz
/Test-Strict-0.17.tar.gz
/Test-Strict-0.18.tar.gz
/Test-Strict-0.19.tar.gz
+/Test-Strict-0.20.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Strict.spec b/perl-Test-Strict.spec
index 9b176e2..2fceb3f 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Strict.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Strict.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Test-Strict
-Version:0.19
+Version:0.20
Release:1%{?dist}
# see lib/Test/Strict.pm
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.20-1
+- 0.20 bump, detect even more modules
+
* Thu Feb 21 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.19-1
- 0.19 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index f4927fa..564fabf 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-545729880f0431621863021517c7df56 Test-Strict-0.19.tar.gz
+99250df30f2805250ce25a485ad9a31f Test-Strict-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Strict/f18] 0.20 bump
Summary of changes: 58a2813... 0.20 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: SWAT will be removed from the Samba package
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, the Samba Team has announced [1] that it will remove SWAT from the Samba Suite. SWAT is unmaintained and has the most security bugs. Andrew, I'm in that thread on the Samba mailing list at http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171643.html. I don't see an actual decision there, just a call for discussion. Also, if you decide to remove the samba-swat package from the samba suite, should it be obsoleted or merely reported as conflicting with new samba-common releases, to make sure people delete it before doing upgrades and getting in dependency trouble? It might even be better pulled as part of the next Samba 4.0.4 package. And while you're in that package: I've got rewrite of the .spec file and the other dependencies for RHEL compatibility of 4.0.3. It's up at https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.0.3-srpm/, along with RPM building tools for all the other dependencies below: iniparser # not in RHEL krb5 # Version 1.10 in RHEL 6.4 is good enough libtalloc libtdb libldb libtevent I plan to remove the samba-swat subpackage in Fedora 18, 19 and rawhide as soon as it gets removed from the current Samba development tree. Cheers, -- andreas -- Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: 8B7EB4B8 Red Hat a...@redhat.com Samba Team a...@samba.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Problems when install kernel-debuginfo package
Hi, I want to install kernel-debuginfo package, and get the following msg, [root@localhost pkger]# yum clean all;debuginfo-install kernel Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Cleaning repos: fedora updates Cleaning up Everything No delta-package files removed by presto Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit enabling fedora-debuginfo enabling updates-debuginfo fedora/18/x86_64/metalink| 8.6 kB 00:00 fedora | 4.2 kB 00:00 updates/18/x86_64/metalink | 5.9 kB 00:00 updates | 4.7 kB 00:00 (1/2): updates/primary_db | 7.4 MB 00:16 (2/2): fedora/primary_db | 17 MB 00:36 Could not find debuginfo for main pkg: kernel-3.7.8-202.fc18.x86_64 Package yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.31-9.fc18.noarch already installed and latest version -- Running transaction check --- Package kernel-debuginfo.x86_64 0:3.6.10-4.fc18 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64 = 3.6.10-4.fc18 for package: kernel-debuginfo-3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64 --- Package kernel-debuginfo.x86_64 0:3.7.9-201.fc18 will be installed -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: kernel-debuginfo-3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64 (fedora-debuginfo) Requires: kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64 = 3.6.10-4.fc18 Installed: kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-3.7.9-201.fc18.x86_64 (@updates-debuginfo) kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64 = 3.7.9-201.fc18 Available: kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64 (fedora-debuginfo) kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64 = 3.6.10-4.fc18 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest [root@localhost pkger]# Thanks, xning -- Xibo Ning Hosted and shared services Red Hat Asia Pacific IRC Account: xning at #hss #eng-china #libra -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: system freezes after loading gdm/gnome
On 02/25/2013 09:26 AM, Jan Dvořák wrote: Hi, I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested after a reboot. The problem is that I don't get any logs and running startx with exec gnome-session in .xinitrc leads to the exactly same problem. Interestingly, if I run just gnome-terminal from my .xinitrc, close it and then re-run with full gnome-session, I get the shell and everything seems to work. Well, except it is somewhat sluggish, suggesting some hidden breakage. Any advices? Best regards, Jan Dvorak Seeing this also. Rawhide up-to-date with stock ati driver on RV 630. X seems to be eating up cpu cycles during sluggishness. -- Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Test-Compile-0.24.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Compile: 52c2b3d0bbd918b1a498e3df5c7fa9d3 Test-Compile-0.24.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Compile] 0.24 doc bump
commit 7bb29f46cfc5e37c8e19c5af52a97092428bd97d
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 25 16:29:51 2013 +0100
0.24 doc bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Compile.spec | 10 --
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 267491f..ec6eb35 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ Test-Compile-0.13.tar.gz
/Test-Compile-0.21.tar.gz
/Test-Compile-0.22.tar.gz
/Test-Compile-0.23.tar.gz
+/Test-Compile-0.24.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Compile.spec b/perl-Test-Compile.spec
index c059255..98d1b59 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Compile.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Compile.spec
@@ -1,18 +1,21 @@
Name: perl-Test-Compile
-Version:0.23
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.24
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Check whether Perl module files compile correctly
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Compile/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/E/EG/EGILES/Test-Compile-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Run-time
# Devel::CheckOS is needed only on VMS. See Changes.
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder)
BuildRequires: perl(UNIVERSAL::require)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Tests
# Test::More version is described in Changes
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
@@ -45,6 +48,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.24-1
+- 0.24 bump (docs only)
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.23-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8716eb8..24e97e0 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4fbdd49add23d0d12962a5b4a5f0ed88 Test-Compile-0.23.tar.gz
+52c2b3d0bbd918b1a498e3df5c7fa9d3 Test-Compile-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915236] perl-Test-Strict-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915236 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Test-Strict-0.20-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Strict-0.20-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Eb3TD0F96ja=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 913428] perl-Test-Strict-0.19 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913428 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Test-Strict-0.20-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Strict-0.20-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zWPGmqyyW1a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 912095] perl-Test-Strict-0.18 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912095 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Test-Strict-0.20-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Strict-0.20-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=orEAMliqxha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rb_libtorrent 0.16.8 soname bump
Hi I have pushed out the newer version and rebuilt the following packages for Rawhide * fatrat * flush * qbittorrent * springlobby Since this update seems to fix the problem of magnet links not working, I am also looking into pushing the same updates for Fedora 18 as well Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: SWAT will be removed from the Samba package
On Monday 25 February 2013 10:09:50 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, the Samba Team has announced [1] that it will remove SWAT from the Samba Suite. SWAT is unmaintained and has the most security bugs. Andrew, I'm in that thread on the Samba mailing list at http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171643.html. I don't see an actual decision there, just a call for discussion. Also, if you decide to remove the samba-swat package from the samba suite, should it be obsoleted or merely reported as conflicting with new samba-common releases, to make sure people delete it before doing upgrades and getting in dependency trouble? It might even be better pulled as part of the next Samba 4.0.4 package. That's why I stated below that I will remove it when it gets removed in the Samba development tree upstream. I will handle the correct deinstallation of samba-swat when it gets removed but thanks for the idea with handling it in samba-common. I'm sure it will take some time till it gets removed. And while you're in that package: I've got rewrite of the .spec file and the other dependencies for RHEL compatibility of 4.0.3. It's up at https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.0.3-srpm/, along with RPM building tools for all the other dependencies below: iniparser # not in RHEL krb5 # Version 1.10 in RHEL 6.4 is good enough libtalloc libtdb libldb libtevent I've removed everything for older version on purpose to have a clean spec file. We decided not to support RHEL6 with this. -- Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: 8B7EB4B8 Red Hat a...@redhat.com Samba Team a...@samba.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd/udev Predictable Network Interface Names
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:28:21AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote: Matt Domsch (matt_dom...@dell.com) said: On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:57:42PM -0600, Bill Nottingham wrote: If we can solve the installtime naming convention choice to not eliminate biosdevname, be able to disable systemd/udevd naming, and have the default be possible on a per-system-vendor basis, and solve the NPAR/SR-IOV/Mellanox naming problems, then I can support this proposal. Without fixing these shortcomings though, my customers will have a fit at me. If you're agreeing that biosdevname should be limited to type9/type41 (if I'm reading you right), and if the systemd/udev names still use those fields, what parts of biosdevname are you still requiring? The actual namespace used, or something else? I'd prefer if we didn't force users through another namespace change. I took a lot of flack for changing the namespace once. From their perspective, it's still udev doing the renaming, only now the code moved from a udev helper into udev itself. True; the users likely don't care other than how they enable/disable it. I'd like to see the SR-IOV NPAR devices handled. Those aren't represented in type9/type41, and their commonplace on Dell systems. I'd like to see the Dell-specific PCI VPD-R code from biosdevname included in udev, as that's used to map multi-port devices to port numbers. Those aren't represented in type9/type41, and they're commonplace on Dell systems. OK. I'd like to see kernel driver work to be sure every multi-port driver with the same PCI b/d/b/f sets dev_id. That isn't necessarily true today, which makes it hard to trust. biosdevname needs this too, until such a time as it's dead. Do we have a list of these, or is it a matter of doing a driver audit? CC'ing gospo. (Thanks, Bill, though I've been following this thread as I am on the list). Right now almost no drivers actually set dev_id. In fact mlx4_en, cxgb4, and sfc seem to be the only ones right now. If we feel like this a requirement there will be work on the kernel side to add this. So, aside from the naming convention change (which, hey, if someone else takes the pain for making that change again, not me or my company - go nuts!), the rest is straightforward technical and code can be cribbed if desired from biosdevname or just rewritten. OK, thanks. Let's see what we can do here. My concern is the conflict between trying to cover all of the cases, and trying to avoid writing documentation that is a lot of if your device is hereh, then your name is Y or Z depending on which commandline you booted with when you installed.' Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki
On 25 February 2013 06:37, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: On 02/15/2013 05:11 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Ping. I'd like to finish up the NRM process. What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac ticket? I believe you need to file a trac ticket. That should get this on a FESCo meeting agenda and get this dealt with. The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a month now. My FAS name is mooninite and I have been awaiting the commit ACL for just as long. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Stephen J Smoogen. Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it. Linus Torvalds Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me. —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Planned Outage: Host reboots - 2013-02-27 22:00 UTC
Outage: Host reboots - 2013-02-27 22:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2013-02-27 22:00 UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2013-02-27 22:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We will be rebooting servers to pick up the latest updates. During the outage window, only particular services should be down as their hosts are rebooted. Outages for particular services should be small. Affected Services: Ask Fedora - http://ask.fedoraproject.org/ BFO - http://boot.fedoraproject.org/ Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ GIT / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora People - http://fedorapeople.org/ Main Website - http://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ Secondary Architectures Torrent - http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Wiki - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Unaffected Services: Docs - http://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Spins - http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - http://start.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ QA Services Ticket Link: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3681 Contact Information: Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
review swaps
Hi, Could you review swaps of rfbz #2492 ? Please -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I believe you need to file a trac ticket. That should get this on a FESCo meeting agenda and get this dealt with. Created. Thanks. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1091 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - I have taken ownership of the following packages: gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking ConsoleKit and cpptest. Hi Dan, thanks for picking these up. Just to confirm: gnome-icon-theme and gnome-backgrounds are still very much part of GNOME - so you should expect them to be picked up by our mass builds of GNOME packages. Matthias No problem. You may want to pick up the rest of the gnome stuff.. i.e. notification daemon. Feel to let me know if you need anything. Hi Dan, If you are not interested in the packages that are part of GNOME, I could volunteer to pick up gnome-icon-theme and gnome-backgrounds. Let me know how it works better for you. In any case, thanks for keeping an eye out for these and making sure they don't get dropped from Fedora! Thanks, Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I'd like to finish up the NRM process. What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac ticket? The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a month now. My FAS name is mooninite and I have been awaiting the commit ACL for just as long. +1 to fixing up mediawiki and phase out mediawiki1XX packages. Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki
On 25 February 2013 13:28, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I'd like to finish up the NRM process. What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac ticket? The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a month now. My FAS name is mooninite and I have been awaiting the commit ACL for just as long. +1 to fixing up mediawiki and phase out mediawiki1XX packages. Good luck with that. -- Stephen J Smoogen. Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it. Linus Torvalds Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me. —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:18 -0700 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 February 2013 13:28, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I'd like to finish up the NRM process. What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac ticket? The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a month now. My FAS name is mooninite and I have been awaiting the commit ACL for just as long. +1 to fixing up mediawiki and phase out mediawiki1XX packages. Good luck with that. I think thats a fine goal/plan for Fedora. I don't know that it would work out for EPEL. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
KOji login issue
I wonder if this problem is fixed ? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-October/172600.html We experiencing the same issue Thank you Tatiana -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: KOji login issue
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:48:22 + Tatiana Meleshko tatiana.meles...@guest-tek.com wrote: I wonder if this problem is fixed ? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-October/172600.html We experiencing the same issue There are still reports of it, so I don't think it is. IMHO, we should remove the web login entirely. There's only one thing it can do that the cli cannot (watch a packages builds if you are not a maintainer of that package), and that can be done several other ways: subscribe to the rss feed of builds and filter out packages you are interested, or just watch the fedmsg bus for any packages you are interested in, or just add yourself to watchcommits and when you see a commit you can be somewhat sure there's a build around the corner. In any case, please just use the cli for now and when Dennis is back he can look at fixing it up or removing it. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
Hi, On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package celt071 (orphan) I picked up celt071 (used by mumble). Package dbus-sharp (orphan) comaintained by: chkr I took dbus-sharp, too. Regards, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - I have taken ownership of the following packages: gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking ConsoleKit and cpptest. Hi Dan, thanks for picking these up. Just to confirm: gnome-icon-theme and gnome-backgrounds are still very much part of GNOME - so you should expect them to be picked up by our mass builds of GNOME packages. Matthias No problem. You may want to pick up the rest of the gnome stuff.. i.e. notification daemon. Feel to let me know if you need anything. Hi Dan, If you are not interested in the packages that are part of GNOME, I could volunteer to pick up gnome-icon-theme and gnome-backgrounds. Let me know how it works better for you. In any case, thanks for keeping an eye out for these and making sure they don't get dropped from Fedora! Thanks, Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Hi Kalev, That was the idea, getting more involved and making sure important packages don't get dropped. Feel free to add yourself. I thought gnome used gnome-notification-daemon so I thought that one was deprecated. And regarding guake I will pick that up if no one else does. guake is a great vte. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rb_libtorrent 0.16.8 soname bump
Hi On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Since this update seems to fix the problem of magnet links not working, I am also looking into pushing the same updates for Fedora 18 as well I have now pushed an update for Fedora 18 as well https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flush-0.9.12-5.fc18,fatrat-1.2.0-0.11.beta2.fc18,qbittorrent-3.0.8-5.fc18,springlobby-0.147-4.fc18,rb_libtorrent-0.16.8-1.fc18 I have pushed Deluge 1.3.6 to Rawhide which fixes the above problem with magnet links http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5055807 Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Most buggy packages
Hi On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote: - yes, the naming is a bit unfair, the stats are not meant to point fingers or blame some package for being unstable, it's meant to show which packages causes the most problems so we could focus on them You could use a more neutral name like hot crash reports or Top 10 crashes . Something along those lines sounds less judgmental than buggy. Abrt doesn't really handle bugs. Just crashes. Those aren't the same thing really. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 789557] perl-Bio-Graphics-2.33 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789557 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Bio-Graphics-2.32 is |perl-Bio-Graphics-2.33 is |available |available --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Latest upstream release: 2.33 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.25 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Bio-Graphics/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LEXgTFphmMa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915226] New: perl-Dancer-1.3111 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915226 Bug ID: 915226 Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3111 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Dancer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.3111 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.3110 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dancer/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=llGe9g8F6Ya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915227] New: perl-IO-HTML-1.00 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915227 Bug ID: 915227 Summary: perl-IO-HTML-1.00 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IO-HTML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.00 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.04 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-HTML/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NOQtyXcpexa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914316] perl-Net-Twitter-4.00002 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914316 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Net-Twitter-4.1 is |perl-Net-Twitter-4.2 is |available |available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Latest upstream release: 4.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.18004 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Twitter/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eDRw1GbOXGa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915230] New: perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.04 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915230 Bug ID: 915230 Summary: perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Olson-Abbreviations Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.04 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.03 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Olson-Abbreviations/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KsSqlWNi4ya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915232] New: perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.004 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915232 Bug ID: 915232 Summary: perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.004 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.003 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PerlIO-utf8_strict/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eaC1E45INoa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915233] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.033 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915233 Bug ID: 915233 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.033 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.033 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.032 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-Regexp/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VzqVwVVMrKa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915234] New: perl-Term-Completion-1.00 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915234 Bug ID: 915234 Summary: perl-Term-Completion-1.00 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Term-Completion Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.00 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.91 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-Completion/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jTfMd7TRpsa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915237] New: perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.34 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915237 Bug ID: 915237 Summary: perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.34 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-TabularDisplay Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.34 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.33 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-TabularDisplay/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fwb5ndhmI9a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915230] perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.04 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915230 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j4V0c29bW4a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915236] perl-Test-Strict-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915236 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vd938Q711ca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-UNIVERSAL-require] Clean up and fix FTBFS (#914324)
commit 544110e12f21542f49252134d325db4236c74870
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 09:55:25 2013 +
Clean up and fix FTBFS (#914324)
- BR: perl(lib) and perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) to fix FTBFS (#914324)
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Use %{_fixperms} macro rather than our own chmod incantation
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
- Don't use macros for commands
perl-UNIVERSAL-require.spec | 25 -
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-UNIVERSAL-require.spec b/perl-UNIVERSAL-require.spec
index ac5b5e3..80a9b75 100644
--- a/perl-UNIVERSAL-require.spec
+++ b/perl-UNIVERSAL-require.spec
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
Name: perl-UNIVERSAL-require
Version:0.13
-Release:11%{?dist}
+Release:12%{?dist}
Summary:Require() modules from a variable
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/UNIVERSAL-require/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/UNIVERSAL-require-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(lib)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
# Filter bogus provide for perl(UNIVERSAL) (rpm 4.9 onwards)
%global __provides_exclude ^perl\\(UNIVERSAL\\)
@@ -25,15 +27,14 @@ Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl}
-V:version`; echo $versi
%define __perl_provides %{provfilt}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
-chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%check
make test
@@ -42,13 +43,19 @@ make test
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes
%{perl_vendorlib}/UNIVERSAL/
%{_mandir}/man3/UNIVERSAL::require.3pm*
-
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.13-12
+- BR: perl(lib) and perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) to fix FTBFS (#914324)
+- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+- Use %%{_fixperms} macro rather than our own chmod incantation
+- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
+- Don't use macros for commands
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.13-11
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Carp-Assert] Add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) (Fix FTBFS #914247).
commit 6d7b912643958816b1613fc1205a6927ff9c74ea
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 11:01:44 2013 +0100
Add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) (Fix FTBFS #914247).
- Modernize spec.
perl-Carp-Assert.spec | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Carp-Assert.spec b/perl-Carp-Assert.spec
index a5102c7..16a15e6 100644
--- a/perl-Carp-Assert.spec
+++ b/perl-Carp-Assert.spec
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
Name: perl-Carp-Assert
Version:0.20
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Release:14%{?dist}
Summary:Executable comments
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Carp-Assert/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/Carp-Assert-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Tests)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
@@ -38,10 +37,6 @@ chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
make test
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README
@@ -50,6 +45,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.20-14
+- Add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) (Fix FTBFS #914247).
+- Modernize spec.
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.20-13
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-UNIVERSAL-require] Created tag perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.13-12.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.13-12.fc19' was created pointing to: 544110e... Clean up and fix FTBFS (#914324) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914324] perl-UNIVERSAL-require: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914324 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||p...@city-fan.org Fixed In Version||perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.13 ||-12.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 05:07:27 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- The problem was a missing BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=71cihWvhEDa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914247] perl-Carp-Assert: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914247 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||rc040...@freenet.de Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 05:16:13 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- Missing BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5052416 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k6IAKszuKKa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-MMagic-XS] Clean up and fix FTBFS (#914283)
commit 87133df885fdeca1aa884372b2e86312714793eb
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 10:57:19 2013 +
Clean up and fix FTBFS (#914283)
- BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) to fix FTBFS (#914283)
- BR:/R: perl(File::Spec)
- BR: perl(XSLoader)
- Don't use macros for commands
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Drop filter for unversioned provides, no longer needed
- Use %{_fixperms} macro rather than our own chmod incantation
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
- Add %{?perl_default_filter} to remove unwanted shared object provides
perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec | 54 +++--
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec b/perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec
index ef8fa7f..c477b16 100644
--- a/perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec
+++ b/perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec
@@ -1,15 +1,24 @@
Name: perl-File-MMagic-XS
Version:0.09006
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Guess file type with XS
Group: Development/Libraries
License:ASL 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-MMagic-XS
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DM/DMAKI/File-MMagic-XS-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::MMagic), gdbm-devel, perl(Test::More)
-Requires: perl(File::MMagic)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
+BuildRequires: gdbm-devel
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::MMagic)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(XSLoader)
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(File::MMagic)
+Requires: perl(File::Spec)
+
+# Avoid unwanted shared object provides
+%{?perl_default_filter}
%description
This is a port of Apache2 mod_mime_magic.c in Perl, written in XS with the aim
@@ -19,25 +28,16 @@ an extended amount of time.
%prep
%setup -q -n File-MMagic-XS-%{version}
-cat \EOF %{name}-prov
-#!/bin/sh
-%{__perl_provides} $* |\
-sed -e '/^perl(File::MMagic::XS)$/d'
-EOF
-%define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/File-MMagic-XS-%{version}/%{name}-prov
-chmod +x %{__perl_provides}
-
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
-chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%check
make test
@@ -46,14 +46,24 @@ make test
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/File/
%{perl_vendorarch}/File/
-%{_mandir}/man3/*
-
+%{_mandir}/man3/File::MMagic::XS.3pm*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.09006-11
+- BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) to fix FTBFS (#914283)
+- BR:/R: perl(File::Spec)
+- BR: perl(XSLoader)
+- Don't use macros for commands
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+- Drop filter for unversioned provides, no longer needed
+- Use %%{_fixperms} macro rather than our own chmod incantation
+- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
+- Add %%{?perl_default_filter} to remove unwanted shared object provides
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.09006-10
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
@@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Dec 16 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.09006-2
-- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
+- Rebuild to fix problems with vendorarch/lib (#661697)
* Mon Jul 12 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 0.09006-1
- update to 0.09006
@@ -108,7 +118,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
* Mon Dec 17 2007 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 0.09003-1
- bump to 0.09003
-* Sun Aug 27 2007 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 0.09002-2
+* Sun Aug 26 2007 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 0.09002-2
- license tag fix
- rebuild in devel for ppc32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-MMagic-XS] Created tag perl-File-MMagic-XS-0.09006-11.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-File-MMagic-XS-0.09006-11.fc19' was created pointing to: 87133df... Clean up and fix FTBFS (#914283) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914283] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914283 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||p...@city-fan.org Fixed In Version||perl-File-MMagic-XS-0.09006 ||-11.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 06:09:40 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- The problem was a missing BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ag8I3JfNWLa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914306] perl-Olson-Abbreviations: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914306 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UTM5Q6p8Eza=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Olson-Abbreviations-0.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Olson-Abbreviations: dc969b7935835557c10937ae54168005 Olson-Abbreviations-0.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Olson-Abbreviations] 0.04 bump, fix the build
commit e71c2cb60f8d6ce98a85d8fab92dc150fdebe25e
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 25 13:03:23 2013 +0100
0.04 bump, fix the build
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Olson-Abbreviations.spec | 40
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e541fbb..2210588 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
Olson-Abbreviations-0.02.tar.gz
/Olson-Abbreviations-0.03.tar.gz
+/Olson-Abbreviations-0.04.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Olson-Abbreviations.spec b/perl-Olson-Abbreviations.spec
index 6e48f45..776423c 100644
--- a/perl-Olson-Abbreviations.spec
+++ b/perl-Olson-Abbreviations.spec
@@ -1,20 +1,36 @@
Name: perl-Olson-Abbreviations
-Version:0.03
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.04
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Globally unique timezones abbreviation handling
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Olson-Abbreviations/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/E/EC/ECARROLL/Olson-Abbreviations-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(CPAN)
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Manifest)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MM_Unix)
+BuildRequires: perl(Fcntl)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
+BuildRequires: perl(FindBin)
+BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::ClassAttribute) = 0.25
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.22
BuildRequires: perl(namespace::autoclean)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(vars)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
Requires: perl(MooseX::ClassAttribute) = 0.25
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+
+%{?perl_default_filter}
%description
This module should help you with converting commonly used and often
@@ -24,16 +40,12 @@ ambigious olson abbreviations into TZ offset notation.
%setup -q -n Olson-Abbreviations-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
-
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
%check
make test
@@ -44,6 +56,10 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.04-1
+- 0.04 bump
+- Fix the dependencies
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.03-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index f01bff6..7c2d52c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e0fe7468fa0856889d6347349f788298 Olson-Abbreviations-0.03.tar.gz
+dc969b7935835557c10937ae54168005 Olson-Abbreviations-0.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915292] New: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915292 Bug ID: 915292 Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: stompclt Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: lionel.c...@cern.ch The latest version of stompclt is now 0.8. This is the version to use everywhere. Please upgrade in EPEL. Note that Net::STOMP::Client version 2.0 is now required so the spec file should contain something like: Requires: perl(Net::STOMP::Client) = 2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yVUQE7STTpa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914306] perl-Olson-Abbreviations: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914306 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0. ||04-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 07:19:20 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Fixed the dependency list and bumped to the latest version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=r68TQq8yaAa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915230] perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0.04 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915230 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Olson-Abbreviations-0. ||04-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 07:19:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0XgYXODqcOa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915295] New: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915295 Bug ID: 915295 Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: perl-Config-Validator Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: lionel.c...@cern.ch The latest version of Config::Validator is now 1.0. This is the version to use everywhere. Please upgrade in EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HJdkIohebWa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-TabularDisplay] 1.34 bump
commit 347bb2b742b00417fa0096ad763f35f1d71c7104
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 25 15:35:31 2013 +0100
1.34 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Text-TabularDisplay.spec | 17 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e20c82b..6eb5442 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ Text-TabularDisplay-1.22.tar.gz
/Text-TabularDisplay-1.30.tar.gz
/Text-TabularDisplay-1.31.tar.gz
/Text-TabularDisplay-1.33.tar.gz
+/Text-TabularDisplay-1.34.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Text-TabularDisplay.spec b/perl-Text-TabularDisplay.spec
index 0c6c29a..3acb26e 100644
--- a/perl-Text-TabularDisplay.spec
+++ b/perl-Text-TabularDisplay.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Text-TabularDisplay
-Version:1.33
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:1.34
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Display text in formatted table output
# see TabularDisplay.pm's header
License:GPLv2
@@ -8,8 +8,11 @@ Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-TabularDisplay/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DA/DARREN/Text-TabularDisplay-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(integer)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Test)
+BuildRequires: perl(vars)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
@@ -26,20 +29,22 @@ perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
make test
%files
-%doc Changes COPYING README examples/
+%doc COPYING README examples/
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.34-1
+- 1.34 bump
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.33-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 4acded5..08ece4e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-021637a87f9b949eb1dd9da8253e9d86 Text-TabularDisplay-1.33.tar.gz
+ffe257460ffd5ea4ff36b926478a91b3 Text-TabularDisplay-1.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915237] perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.34 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915237 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1. ||34-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 09:40:17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cm7gNC6l3Ga=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 915235] perl-Test-Compile-0.24 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915235 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||psab...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Compile-0.24-1.fc ||19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com Last Closed||2013-02-25 10:43:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kskRnLvdpha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 913493] Provide native systemd unit file for mogstored
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913493 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #700444|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sQ1BdVrRYRa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[php-pear-Text-Diff] Fix version in changelog
commit 132ed774c38db12f3349e64f7a143ba6721591a2 Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org Date: Mon Feb 25 19:16:15 2013 +0100 Fix version in changelog php-pear-Text-Diff.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/php-pear-Text-Diff.spec b/php-pear-Text-Diff.spec index e496232..a894672 100644 --- a/php-pear-Text-Diff.spec +++ b/php-pear-Text-Diff.spec @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ fi %changelog -* Fri Feb 22 2013 Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org - 1.0.6-7 +* Fri Feb 22 2013 Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org - 1.1.1-7 - fix metadata location, FTBFS #914367 * Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.1.1-6 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII] BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914277
commit ecc45b114a56748ddba962afea8436f43abefdf0
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 20:04:02 2013 +0100
BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914277
perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec b/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec
index 7e437c4..b418b8d 100644
--- a/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec
+++ b/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII
Version:0.03
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:EucJP-ascii - An eucJP-open mapping
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(XSLoader)
BuildRequires: perl(base)
BuildRequires: perl(Encode::CJKConstants)
BuildRequires: perl(Encode::JP::JIS7)
+BuildRequires: perl-Encode-devel
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 0.03-6
+- BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914277.
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.03-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Encode-HanExtra] BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914278
commit 7349a626339913a69d77a8e98a14ad5884662a70
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 20:04:47 2013 +0100
BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914278
perl-Encode-HanExtra.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Encode-HanExtra.spec b/perl-Encode-HanExtra.spec
index 6294206..bf718f0 100644
--- a/perl-Encode-HanExtra.spec
+++ b/perl-Encode-HanExtra.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Encode-HanExtra
Version:0.23
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Extra sets of Chinese encodings
License:MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Encode/Encode-HanExtra-%{v
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl-Encode-devel
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -54,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 0.23-8
+- BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914278.
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.23-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Encode-JIS2K] BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914280
commit acba0051ae83192b7076b7652ec215e9338f3e82
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 20:06:44 2013 +0100
BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914280
perl-Encode-JIS2K.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Encode-JIS2K.spec b/perl-Encode-JIS2K.spec
index 3badb81..d25ee84 100644
--- a/perl-Encode-JIS2K.spec
+++ b/perl-Encode-JIS2K.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Encode-JIS2K
Version:0.02
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
Summary:JIS X 0212 (aka JIS 2000) Encodings
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Patch0:
perl-Encode-JIS2K-0.02-Fix_package_declaration.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl-Encode-devel
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -48,6 +49,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 0.02-7
+- BR: perl-Encode-devel for enc2xs, FTBFS #914280.
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.02-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914280] perl-Encode-JIS2K: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914280 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 14:19:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BfNUlWoKkka=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914278] perl-Encode-HanExtra: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914278 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 14:19:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LUbA6XSvdCa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914277] perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914277 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 14:19:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hJ4odd1Sbga=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 878783] perl-Apache-Htpasswd-1.9 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878783 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-25 14:22:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Uxxxl2mgS9a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Module-ExtractUse-0.29.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse: b0655591df99cf7bcafd488be3a8521c Module-ExtractUse-0.29.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Update to 0.29
commit 1b83b9c99dda8eb9ff4c64173596d21e517bde2b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 25 22:04:00 2013 +
Update to 0.29
- New upstream release 0.29
- Fixed regex to filter use/require (CPAN RT#83569)
perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec b/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec
index 52ff168..adaf692 100644
--- a/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Module-ExtractUse
-Version:0.28
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.29
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Find out what modules are used
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/Module::ExtractUse::Grammar.3pm*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 25 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.29-1
+- Update to 0.29
+ - Fixed regex to filter use/require (CPAN RT#83569)
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.28-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index a1f64c7..cb9df91 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5ad0c19fa47fe9c338e7dac76b0ad18f Module-ExtractUse-0.28.tar.gz
+b0655591df99cf7bcafd488be3a8521c Module-ExtractUse-0.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 911536] perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911536 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bKf0ocf3rBa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 910685] perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.60 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910685 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pzztYRmVMPa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 914969] Bogus dependency
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914969 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.74.05-2.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.74.05-2.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3028/perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.74.05-2.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GcZ4IH0X4Ua=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 570979] UTF8 PO files not being read as UTF8
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570979 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2010-03-07 04:55:35 |2013-02-25 21:53:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nWBxL7wlsya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 570979] UTF8 PO files not being read as UTF8
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570979 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Locale-PO-0.23-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JeiYGY4VCna=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 911536] perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911536 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jDCVBqTszMa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 910685] perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.60 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910685 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5kSMqtK25Ca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
