Re: F24 System Wide Change: Systemd package split

[Stephen Gallagher]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/19/2015 09:04 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:28:25PM +, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:32:02PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> * systemd-udev.rpm will consist of systemd-udevd, udevadm, udev
>>> rules, and the hardware database.
>> 
>> So close!  libguestfs needs udevd and /sbin/reboot.
>> Unfortunately the latter is still part of the main systemd
>> package.
> reboot is systemctl is a thin client for systemd, so no hope here
> :)

Why does libguestfs need /sbin/reboot? That seems a little suspect to me.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlZPIlkACgkQeiVVYja6o6OzbwCfQdbmr88GKWVX6EpH9r55XwGP
qO0AnRt/Tb3o5tFTIlBvHy4p7yZ666Xv
=xvRe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Packaging:NamingGuidelines Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

[Tomas Mraz]

On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto  writes:
> > 
> > SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump
> > rightmost
> > SB> version, when we change the source, we bump the left version, so
> > we
> > SB> can distinguish when we update the source and when we updated the
> > SB> .spec, this contrast for me is important.
> > 
> > For me, the simple rule that a Release: tag less than 1 implies
> > prerelease software, while a Release: tag of 1 or greater implies a
> > post-release package, is important.  So far the proponents of this
> > change haven't shown what things would actually look like after this
> > change, so it's hard for me to come up with a reason to change my
> > opinion.
> 
> prerelease numbering can't begin with 0 and increased to 0.1 because :
> 
> next version of foo-0.b would be foo-0.1.b and "b">1 

Nope, 1>"b" in rpm version compare.

-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
  Turkish proverb
(You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.)


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Ian Malone]

On 12 November 2015 at 14:59, Ray Strode  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Jared K. Smith
>  wrote:
>> I've been testing Wayland myself since around the F22 time period, but
>> "middle click paste" and the occasional odd bug keep annoying me enough to
>> go back to X.  Can you elaborate on the plans for supporting middle click to
>> paste, or is it considered a relic of a bygone era and I should try to
>> unlearn?
>
> Plans for middle-click paste are tracked here:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/PrimarySelection
>

This would actually be quite a productivity killer for me, not just
the lack of middle-button paste[1], but also removing a separate
copy-buffer. It is seriously useful to be able to carry around
multiple pieces of text, particularly if you're going to need to
keeping one and change the other (or working on two things at once).

[1] Apparently middle mouse buttons are rare. I'm in an office
surrounded by them and them only computers I've used without one for
roughly the past decade are my old laptop (now moved on, but had
emulated middle click, maybe the wayland developers were unaware of
this too), and other people's mac laptops, which have their own
'easter egg' combinations of one, two, three(?) finger clicks and
drags.

-- 
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Reindl Harald]

Am 20.11.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Ian Malone:

On 12 November 2015 at 14:59, Ray Strode  wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Jared K. Smith
 wrote:

I've been testing Wayland myself since around the F22 time period, but
"middle click paste" and the occasional odd bug keep annoying me enough to
go back to X.  Can you elaborate on the plans for supporting middle click to
paste, or is it considered a relic of a bygone era and I should try to
unlearn?


Plans for middle-click paste are tracked here:

https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/PrimarySelection



This would actually be quite a productivity killer for me, not just
the lack of middle-button paste[1], but also removing a separate
copy-buffer. It is seriously useful to be able to carry around
multiple pieces of text, particularly if you're going to need to
keeping one and change the other (or working on two things at once).


+1


[1] Apparently middle mouse buttons are rare. I'm in an office
surrounded by them and them only computers I've used without one for
roughly the past decade are my old laptop (now moved on, but had
emulated middle click, maybe the wayland developers were unaware of
this too), and other people's mac laptops, which have their own
'easter egg' combinations of one, two, three(?) finger clicks and
drags


"there are few middle mouse buttons in the world" is just laughable in 
2015, every single wheel-mouse for many years supports just pressing the 
wheel and most these days even let you scroll left-right


if that would have been written by a Apple user 10 years ago, well, but 
now even the "you don't need more than one mouse button" apple fanboys 
truned to "a mouse without a wheel where you can scroll up-down *and* 
left-right is unusable"




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[EPEL-devel]Re: Any news on alternative arch support?

[Bryan Chan]

Peter Robinson  wrote on 2015-11-13 11:20:08 AM:

> I'm the secondary architecture release engineering lead. I've not yet
> decided how to proceed with s390 support in EPEL. I've got a couple of
> ideas but nothing that is final. In the next few weeks we'll be
> building and importing ppc64le and once that is complete, as it's the
> first new EPEL arch added in some time, I'll have a better idea how
> best to proceed.
>
> I've got grave concerns about remote builder capability. We would need
> to use the internal Red Hat mainframe but the remote ppc64le builders
> for COPR have been less that stellar causing consistent issues for the
> infrastructure team so to say I'm cautious in this regard doesn't even
> come close. I have another idea but I need to find some time to test
> that option to see if it's feasible.

Hi Peter, thanks for the update. Does the internal Red Hat mainframe
count as a remote builder as well? Presumably it wouldn't have the
same reliability issues that plague the remote ppc64le builders. For
COPR are you looking for additional hardware or will you use the internal
Red Hat mainframe as well?

Thanks, Bryan
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]TexLive

[Germano Massullo]

I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/  that there
is not texlive for EPEL7.
But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum search texlive" you get
many packages. They have been simply automatically ported from the EPEL
6 repos? Why are them so less in amount, compared to the Fedora
texlive-full-scheme?
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded DateTime-Incomplete-0.08.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Incomplete

[notifications]

00b46e791cd95417cd81fbd5b004231e  DateTime-Incomplete-0.08.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Incomplete/DateTime-Incomplete-0.08.tar.gz/md5/00b46e791cd95417cd81fbd5b004231e/DateTime-Incomplete-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283449] perl-Socket-2.021 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283449

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Socket-2.021-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Socket'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d96e31cecd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283947] New: no hardening build on F23

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283947

Bug ID: 1283947
   Summary: no hardening build on F23
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 23
 Component: perl
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: h.rei...@thelounge.net
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, iarn...@gmail.com,
jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com, rc040...@freenet.de,
tcall...@redhat.com



https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages

perl  17705 Partial RELRO No canary foundNX enabledNo PIE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce]Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151120 nightly compose nominated for testing

[adamwill]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151120. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Notable package version changes:
python-blivet - 20151117: 1.16-2, 20151120: 1.17-1
anaconda - 20151117: 24.6-2, 20151120: 24.7-1

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/24

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Security_Lab
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Download

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relval: https://www.happyassassin.net/wikitcms/
On behalf of: adamwill
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283609] perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-2.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283609

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-2.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b659b52127

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Disabling predictable interface names

[wheelz]

You need to run dracut to rebuild initramfs, or you wait for the next kernel 
update. 

On 2015, November 20, Friday 00:18:37 Dusty Mabe wrote:
> According to [1] predictable interface naming can be disabled with a
> symlink to /dev/null or by providing net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command
> line. It seems like symlinking to /dev/null isn't working any more.
> 
> Is symlinking to /dev/null supposed to still work? We are seeing this on
> Atomic Cloud images where the symlink is in place but net.ifnames=0
> isn't on the cmd line so we are getting ens* interface names.
> 
> [1] -
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterface
> Names/


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1283449] perl-Socket-2.021 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283449



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Socket-2.021-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Socket'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-22dbc37884

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-DateTime-Incomplete (master). "0.08 bump"

[notifications]

>From 29f3b39a0efb94da0c15757ee3a62f1a3ad8555f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:40:51 +0100
Subject: 0.08 bump

---
 .gitignore|  1 +
 perl-DateTime-Incomplete.spec | 33 +++--
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9de1f3e..ae6fb2b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /DateTime-Incomplete-0.07.tar.gz
+/DateTime-Incomplete-0.08.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Incomplete.spec b/perl-DateTime-Incomplete.spec
index 543a90a..cc8ae56 100644
--- a/perl-DateTime-Incomplete.spec
+++ b/perl-DateTime-Incomplete.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-DateTime-Incomplete
-Version:0.07
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:0.08
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Representing partial dates and times
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 # patch to address 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address has 
been sent upstream at https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=97520
@@ -8,21 +8,30 @@ Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Incomplete/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/DateTime/DateTime-Incomplete-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  coreutils
+BuildRequires:  findutils
+BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  sed
+# Run-time:
+BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Event::Recurrence)
+BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Set) >= 0.1401
+BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Validate)
+BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
+# Tests:
 BuildRequires:  perl(constant)
 BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime)
-BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Event::Recurrence)
 BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Locale)
-BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Set)
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Validate)
-BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
 BuildRequires:  perl(utf8)
-BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
-Requires:   perl(DateTime::Locale)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(DateTime::Set) >= 0.1401
+
+# Remove under-specified dependencies
+%global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%{__requires_exclude}|}^perl\\(DateTime::Set\\)$
 
 %description
 DateTime::Incomplete is a class for representing partial dates and times.
@@ -49,11 +58,15 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} 
\;
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc Changes LICENSE README TODO
+%license LICENSE
+%doc Changes README TODO
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 20 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.08-1
+- 0.08 bump
+
 * Thu Jun 18 2015 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 0.07-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index a93b6cd..38207a8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9e6f102ecdadeb8d066caa8a109225ed  DateTime-Incomplete-0.07.tar.gz
+00b46e791cd95417cd81fbd5b004231e  DateTime-Incomplete-0.08.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime-Incomplete.git/commit/?h=master=29f3b39a0efb94da0c15757ee3a62f1a3ad8555f
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282911] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Salsa20 - Encrypt data with the Salsa20 cipher

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282911

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #11 from Petr Šabata  ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #10)
> - Added "%license" tag (according
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#The_.25license_tag since I
> believe there is a doubled percent sign above);

This works too.  Good to know.

> - Added AUTOMATED_TESTING variable for more thorough testing plan;

Ack.


Well, all good now.  Approving.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283967] New: perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-6.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail: Can't locate DateTime/Locale/de.pm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283967

Bug ID: 1283967
   Summary: perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-6.fc24 FTBFS: tests
fail: Can't locate DateTime/Locale/de.pm
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-DateTime-Incomplete
  Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: dd...@cpan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-6.fc24 fails to build in F24 because tests fails:

t/06next.t ... ok
Can't locate DateTime/Locale/de.pm in @INC (you may need to install the
DateTime::Locale::de module) (@INC contains:
/builddir/build/BUILD/DateTime-Incomplete-0.07/blib/lib
/builddir/build/BUILD/DateTime-Incomplete-0.07/blib/arch /usr/local/lib64/perl5
/usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at (eval 50)
line 2,  line 44.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 50) line 2,  line 44.
# Looks like you planned 100 tests but ran 38.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 38.
t/13strftime.t ... 
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 62/100 subtests 

This is caused by upgrading perl-DateTime-Locale from 0.92 to 1.01 that changed
API. Upstream released DateTime-Incomplete-0.08 that should fix it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 20.11.2015 v 13:23 Thomas Gilliard napsal(a):
>
>
> On 11/20/2015 03:15 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 10.11.2015 v 20:54 Ray Strode napsal(a):
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Today I built snapshots of gnome-session gdm gnome-shell and mutter
>>> that change how we do sessions at the login screen. We'll no longer
>>> have separate items for GNOME and GNOME on Wayland.  Instead they're
>>> now both consolidated under the GNOME item.  That item will use
>>> wayland if it can, but if it falls back (because of a failure or
>>> nvidia proprietary drivers, or the user explicitly disables wayland in
>>> /etc/gdm/custom.conf) then that GNOME item will use Xorg instead.
>>>
>>> I'm doing this for now in rawhide as preparation for this system-wide
>>> f24 change:
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefault
>>>
>>> If things don't pan out for whatever reason, or the change gets
>>> otherwise rejected for f24, we'll split the items back out into two
>>> items.
>>>
>>> But it's good to get this in rawhide now, so we can get as much
>>> exposure as possible to potential wayland problems and get them fixed
>>> up before release.
>>>
>>> Just a heads up ! If you're a rawhide user please test!
>>>
>>> --Ray
>> So is there some tracker with all the issues? I observe various strange
>> behaviors, such as Empathy not opening Discussion dialog, tabs in FF
>> cannot be moved, various strange crashes after user log out, but no
>> response from stakeholders :/
>>
>>
>> Vít
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Wayland_problems

That is useful indeed. Thanks.

It should be linked from the change proposal page probably ...


Vít

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

ppisar uploaded HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz for perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast

[notifications]

7f1f80c0407e9ad313e7673800336905  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast/HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz/md5/7f1f80c0407e9ad313e7673800336905/HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1238804] /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||h.rei...@thelounge.net



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
*** Bug 1283947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283947] no hardening build on F23

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283947

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2015-11-20 06:34:26



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1238804 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11920530

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283970] New: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.16-10.fc24 FTBFS: test fails: Attribute (loc) does not pass the type constraint because: Validation failed for 'DateTime::Locale' with val

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283970

Bug ID: 1283970
   Summary: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.16-10.fc24
FTBFS: test fails: Attribute (loc) does not pass the
type constraint because: Validation failed for
'DateTime::Locale' with value
DateTime::Locale::FromData=HASH(0x21d0080) (not isa
DateTime::Locale::r
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.16-10.fc24 fails to build in F24
because tests fail:

+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib',
'blib/arch')" t/01_basic.t t/02_olson_abbreviations.t t/03_local_floating.t
Attribute (loc) does not pass the type constraint because: Validation failed
for 'DateTime::Locale' with value DateTime::Locale::FromData=HASH(0x21d0080)
(not isa DateTime::Locale::root) at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Moose/Object.pm line 24
Moose::Object::new('Gorch', 'loc', 'he_IL') called at t/01_basic.t line 104
# Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 16.
t/01_basic.t  
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
All 16 subtests passed 

Difference between working and failing build root:

perl-DateTime-Locale 0.92-1.fc24 > 1.01-1.fc24
glibc 2.22.90-13.fc24 > 2.22.90-16.fc24
perl-Carp 1.36-346.fc23 > 1.38-1.fc24
glibc-common 2.22.90-13.fc24 > 2.22.90-16.fc24
glibc-devel 2.22.90-13.fc24 > 2.22.90-16.fc24
glibc-headers 2.22.90-13.fc24 > 2.22.90-16.fc24
glib2 2.47.1-1.fc24 > 2.47.1-2.fc24
kernel-headers 4.4.0-0.rc0.git4.2 > 4.4.0-0.rc0.git5.1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1280112] perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280112

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Assignee|dd...@cpan.org  |ppi...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283967] perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-6.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail: Can't locate DateTime/Locale/de.pm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283967

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|dd...@cpan.org  |ppi...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283967] perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-6.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail: Can't locate DateTime/Locale/de.pm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283967

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.
   ||08-1.fc24
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-11-20 07:48:08



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20
   ||-1.fc24



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]Re: Centos 7, 32 bits edition

[zikamev]

Hi everybody

Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when EPEL packages 
will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ?

Thx
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). "Use configuration provided by redhat-rpm-config (#1282829)"

[notifications]

From 59f3e85d33c7f5930426b516273f0fdc3347f3ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:39:42 +0100
Subject: Use configuration provided by redhat-rpm-config (#1282829)

---
 perl-File-RsyncP.spec | 8 ++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index c442db7..4ba4293 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-File-RsyncP
 Version:0.74
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 # 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What_about_the_RSA_license_on_their_MD5_implementation.3F_Isn.27t_that_GPL-incompatible.3F
 License:GPLv2 and GPLv3 and (GPL+ or Artistic)
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CB/CBARRATT/File-RsyncP-%{v
 # Build
 BuildRequires: perl
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: redhat-rpm-config
 # Runtime
 BuildRequires: perl(AutoLoader)
 BuildRequires: perl(Config)
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ daemon on the remote machine.
 %prep
 %setup -q -n File-RsyncP-%{version}
 # Update config.guess/sub to fix builds on new architectures (aarch64/ppc64le)
-cp /usr/lib/rpm/config.* FileList/
+cp /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.* FileList/
 
 %build
 perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -60,6 +61,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 20 2015 Petr Šabata  - 0.74-2
+- Use configuration provided by redhat-rpm-config (#1282829)
+
 * Tue Feb 03 2015 Petr Šabata  - 0.74-1
 - 0.74 bump
 - Minor license change
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7=59f3e85d33c7f5930426b516273f0fdc3347f3ea
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1097142
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1097142=edit
[patch] Update to 0.20 (#1283965)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] New: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965

Bug ID: 1283965
   Summary: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.20
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.19-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Headers-Fast/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1280112] perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280112

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.
   ||08-1.fc24
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-11-20 07:48:27



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1280112] perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280112



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ppisar's perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.08-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=700488

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]New EPEL PPC builders in koji

[Peter Robinson]

Hi All,

Just to give a heads up we now have some shiny new builders VMs for
PPC in EPEL. They should be at least as fast as the x86_64 builders.
We've also  doubled the amount to four.

They're currently running Fedora 21 as I will need to very shortly
rebuild the underlying hypervisors but once that is done they'll all
be shiny Fedora 23. This will probably be next week some time.

In the interim let me know if  you see any issues with builds etc so I
can investigate.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast (f21). "0.20 bump"

[notifications]

>From f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:51:15 +0100
Subject: 0.20 bump

---
 .gitignore  | 1 +
 perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec | 5 -
 sources | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 29a6643..2acb90a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+/HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
index 89e05d2..6bc7946 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
-Version:0.19
+Version:0.20
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 20 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.20-1
+- 0.20 bump
+
 * Wed Sep 09 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.19-1
 - Packaging correction (bug #1230227)
 - 0.19 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0c30ad3..09c7dc4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c9493ff2fe0e1b9009d9add281a94be4  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+7f1f80c0407e9ad313e7673800336905  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.git/commit/?h=f21=f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast (f22). "0.20 bump"

[notifications]

>From f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:51:15 +0100
Subject: 0.20 bump

---
 .gitignore  | 1 +
 perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec | 5 -
 sources | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 29a6643..2acb90a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+/HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
index 89e05d2..6bc7946 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
-Version:0.19
+Version:0.20
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 20 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.20-1
+- 0.20 bump
+
 * Wed Sep 09 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.19-1
 - Packaging correction (bug #1230227)
 - 0.19 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0c30ad3..09c7dc4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c9493ff2fe0e1b9009d9add281a94be4  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+7f1f80c0407e9ad313e7673800336905  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.git/commit/?h=f22=f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast (f23). "0.20 bump"

[notifications]

>From f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:51:15 +0100
Subject: 0.20 bump

---
 .gitignore  | 1 +
 perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec | 5 -
 sources | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 29a6643..2acb90a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+/HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
index 89e05d2..6bc7946 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
-Version:0.19
+Version:0.20
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 20 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.20-1
+- 0.20 bump
+
 * Wed Sep 09 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.19-1
 - Packaging correction (bug #1230227)
 - 0.19 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0c30ad3..09c7dc4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c9493ff2fe0e1b9009d9add281a94be4  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+7f1f80c0407e9ad313e7673800336905  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.git/commit/?h=f23=f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ffdfca8c41

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast (master). "0.20 bump"

[notifications]

>From f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:51:15 +0100
Subject: 0.20 bump

---
 .gitignore  | 1 +
 perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec | 5 -
 sources | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 29a6643..2acb90a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+/HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
index 89e05d2..6bc7946 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
-Version:0.19
+Version:0.20
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 20 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.20-1
+- 0.20 bump
+
 * Wed Sep 09 2015 Petr Pisar  - 0.19-1
 - Packaging correction (bug #1230227)
 - 0.19 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0c30ad3..09c7dc4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c9493ff2fe0e1b9009d9add281a94be4  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19.tar.gz
+7f1f80c0407e9ad313e7673800336905  HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.git/commit/?h=master=f5ccfef766110e4a9d45a2a2baa6b6ce35f8e720
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rawhide report: 20151120 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

Compose started at Fri Nov 20 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libOpenMeshCore.so.3.2
[MUMPS]
MUMPS-openmpi-5.0.1-5.fc24.i686 requires libopen-rte.so.12(openmpi-i386)
MUMPS-openmpi-5.0.1-5.fc24.i686 requires libopen-pal.so.13(openmpi-i386)
[alliance]
alliance-5.0-40.20090901snap.fc22.i686 requires libXm.so.2
[bitlyclip]
bitlyclip-0.2.2-6.fc23.noarch requires python-bitlyapi
[bugwarrior]
bugwarrior-1.3.0-1.fc24.noarch requires python-twiggy
bugwarrior-1.3.0-1.fc24.noarch requires python-bitlyapi
[devassistant]
devassistant-cli-0.11.2-1.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4
devassistant-core-0.11.2-1.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4
devassistant-gui-0.11.2-1.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4
[eclipse-jbosstools]
eclipse-jbosstools-as-4.2.2-1.fc22.noarch requires 
osgi(org.eclipse.tm.terminal)
[fawkes]
fawkes-core-0.5.0-26.fc24.i686 requires libmicrohttpd.so.10
fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-26.fc24.i686 requires libgeos-3.4.2.so
fawkes-plugin-xmlrpc-0.5.0-26.fc24.i686 requires libmicrohttpd.so.10
[fcitx-libpinyin]
fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1.fc23.i686 requires libpinyin.so.6(LIBPINYIN)
fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1.fc23.i686 requires libpinyin.so.6
[gnash]
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_date_time.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_date_time.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-klash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-klash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-plugin-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
[golang-github-kraman-libcontainer]
golang-github-kraman-libcontainer-devel-0-0.4.gitd700e5b.fc24.noarch 
requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/pkg/netlink)
[golang-github-kubernetes-heapster]
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/google/cadvisor/info/v1)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/google/cadvisor/client)

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 10.11.2015 v 20:54 Ray Strode napsal(a):
> Hey guys,
>
> Today I built snapshots of gnome-session gdm gnome-shell and mutter
> that change how we do sessions at the login screen. We'll no longer
> have separate items for GNOME and GNOME on Wayland.  Instead they're
> now both consolidated under the GNOME item.  That item will use
> wayland if it can, but if it falls back (because of a failure or
> nvidia proprietary drivers, or the user explicitly disables wayland in
> /etc/gdm/custom.conf) then that GNOME item will use Xorg instead.
>
> I'm doing this for now in rawhide as preparation for this system-wide
> f24 change:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefault
>
> If things don't pan out for whatever reason, or the change gets
> otherwise rejected for f24, we'll split the items back out into two
> items.
>
> But it's good to get this in rawhide now, so we can get as much
> exposure as possible to potential wayland problems and get them fixed
> up before release.
>
> Just a heads up ! If you're a rawhide user please test!
>
> --Ray

So is there some tracker with all the issues? I observe various strange
behaviors, such as Empathy not opening Discussion dialog, tabs in FF
cannot be moved, various strange crashes after user log out, but no
response from stakeholders :/


Vít
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Thomas Gilliard]

On 11/20/2015 03:15 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:

Dne 10.11.2015 v 20:54 Ray Strode napsal(a):

Hey guys,

Today I built snapshots of gnome-session gdm gnome-shell and mutter
that change how we do sessions at the login screen. We'll no longer
have separate items for GNOME and GNOME on Wayland.  Instead they're
now both consolidated under the GNOME item.  That item will use
wayland if it can, but if it falls back (because of a failure or
nvidia proprietary drivers, or the user explicitly disables wayland in
/etc/gdm/custom.conf) then that GNOME item will use Xorg instead.

I'm doing this for now in rawhide as preparation for this system-wide
f24 change:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefault

If things don't pan out for whatever reason, or the change gets
otherwise rejected for f24, we'll split the items back out into two
items.

But it's good to get this in rawhide now, so we can get as much
exposure as possible to potential wayland problems and get them fixed
up before release.

Just a heads up ! If you're a rawhide user please test!

--Ray

So is there some tracker with all the issues? I observe various strange
behaviors, such as Empathy not opening Discussion dialog, tabs in FF
cannot be moved, various strange crashes after user log out, but no
response from stakeholders :/


Vít

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Wayland_problems

has a list  "Known issues, frequent complaints, fundamental changes"
satellit
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-31563c0af1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-eb7dea02e9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ppisar's perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=700491

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift

[Dan Horák]

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:28:45 +0100
Jan Kurik  wrote:

> = System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
> 
> Change owner(s):
> * Jonathan Wakely 
> 
> This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 24. This will mean F24 ships
> with the latest upstream Boost release.
> 
> == Detailed Description ==
> The aim is to synchronize Fedora with the most recent Boost release.
> Because ABI stability is one of explicit Boost non-goals, this entails
> rebuilding of all dependent packages. This has also always entailed
> yours truly assisting maintainers of client packages in decoding
> cryptic boostese seen in output from g++. Such care is to be expected
> this time around as well.
> 
> Boost 1.60 is scheduled for release on 2 Dec 2016 and a beta release
> is already available for testing

shouldn't the year be 2015?


Dan

> 
> == Scope ==
> Proposal owners:
> * Build will be done with Boost.Build v2 (which is upstream-sanctioned
> way of building Boost)
> * Request a "f24-boost" build system tag (discussion):
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6235 → f24-boost
> * Build boost into that tag (take a look at the build #606493 for
> inspiration)
> * Post a request for rebuilds to fedora-devel (XXX link to
> fedora-devel message here)
> * Work on rebuilding dependent packages in the tag.
> * When most is done, re-tag all the packages to rawhide
> * Watch fedora-devel and assist in rebuilding broken Boost clients (by
> fixing the client, or Boost).
> 
> In order to discover any problems ASAP the proposal owner has created
> a COPR and built the Boost 1.60.0 beta, and started rebuilding the
> 300+ dependent packages. The results of this COPR will be thrown away,
> but it means any bugs in the upstream release can be reported and
> fixed before the final release (rather than patched in the Fedora
> package) and any changes needed in dependent packages will be known
> sooner.
> 
> Other developers:
> * Those who depend on Boost DSOs will have to rebuild their packages.
> Feature owners will alleviate some of this work as indicated above,
> and will assist those whose packages fail to build in debugging them.
> * The proposal owner has already started test rebuilds of affected
> packages and identifying the needed changes, and will propose patches
> to Boost upstream or to the client packages' upstreams as appropriate.
> 
> Policies and guidelines:
> * Apart from scope, this is business as usual, so no policies, no
> guidelines.
> 
> Trademark approval:
> * N/A (not needed for this Change)
> 
> -- 
> Jan Kuřík
> Platform & Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
> ___
> devel-announce mailing list
> devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1280282] perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.18 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280282



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.18-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1280113] perl-DateTime-Set-0.3600 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280113



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-Set-0.3600-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1278707] perl-SQL-SplitStatement: Failed test t/95-script.t

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278707



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-SQL-SplitStatement-1.00020-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Reindl Harald]

Am 20.11.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Steve Clark:

On 11/20/2015 09:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:

[1] Apparently middle mouse buttons are rare. I'm in an office
surrounded by them and them only computers I've used without one for
roughly the past decade are my old laptop (now moved on, but had
emulated middle click, maybe the wayland developers were unaware of
this too), and other people's mac laptops, which have their own
'easter egg' combinations of one, two, three(?) finger clicks and
drags.


I just did a quick walk around our office of approximately 70 people and
every mouse had 3 buttons.
As far as the middle button paste being an "easter-egg" it was
documented in the "X Windows Systems User Guide"
on page 97 way back in 1990


well, i bought my first PC in august 1999, installed the first Linux 
october 1999 and used the middle-click-paste from the very beginning 
even on a 2-key mouse by just press both kyes at the same time


that was SuSE Linux 6.1 or so and now 16 years later we talk about 
"eastereggs" - not sure if i should laugh or whine about the new 
developer attitudes throwing away anything because someone pretend it's 
not known or used and replace woking things with feature crippeled shiny 
new ones bringing us back in time 15 to 30 years




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1278707] perl-SQL-SplitStatement: Failed test t/95-script.t

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278707

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-SQL-SplitStatement-1.0
   ||0020-4.fc22
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-11-20 10:24:37



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide 20151120 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64

Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151119:

Kde disk raw armhfp
Xfce disk raw armhfp
Lxde disk raw armhfp
Lxde live i386
Xfce live i386

Images in Rawhide 20151119 but not this:

Soas live x86_64
Kde live x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 20 of 48

ID: 8696Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 8693Test: x86_64 generic_boot default_install
ID: 8692Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
ID: 8690Test: i386 universal server_ext3
ID: 8686Test: i386 universal server_repository_http_graphical
ID: 8682Test: x86_64 universal server_lvmthin@uefi
ID: 8676Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_encrypted@uefi
ID: 8674Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_pata@uefi
ID: 8673Test: x86_64 universal server_sata_multi@uefi
ID: 8671Test: x86_64 universal server_shrink_ntfs
ID: 8670Test: x86_64 universal server_shrink_ext4
ID: 8668Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
ID: 8664Test: x86_64 universal server_lvmthin
ID: 8663Test: x86_64 universal server_ext3
ID: 8659Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space
ID: 8658Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_encrypted
ID: 8657Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_partial
ID: 8656Test: x86_64 universal server_repository_http_variation
ID: 8655Test: x86_64 universal server_repository_http_graphical
ID: 8654Test: x86_64 universal server_mirrorlist_graphical

Passed openQA tests: 28 of 48
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

F24 System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift

[Jan Kurik]

= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160

Change owner(s):
* Jonathan Wakely 

This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 24. This will mean F24 ships
with the latest upstream Boost release.

== Detailed Description ==
The aim is to synchronize Fedora with the most recent Boost release.
Because ABI stability is one of explicit Boost non-goals, this entails
rebuilding of all dependent packages. This has also always entailed
yours truly assisting maintainers of client packages in decoding
cryptic boostese seen in output from g++. Such care is to be expected
this time around as well.

Boost 1.60 is scheduled for release on 2 Dec 2016 and a beta release
is already available for testing


== Scope ==
Proposal owners:
* Build will be done with Boost.Build v2 (which is upstream-sanctioned
way of building Boost)
* Request a "f24-boost" build system tag (discussion):
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6235 → f24-boost
* Build boost into that tag (take a look at the build #606493 for inspiration)
* Post a request for rebuilds to fedora-devel (XXX link to
fedora-devel message here)
* Work on rebuilding dependent packages in the tag.
* When most is done, re-tag all the packages to rawhide
* Watch fedora-devel and assist in rebuilding broken Boost clients (by
fixing the client, or Boost).

In order to discover any problems ASAP the proposal owner has created
a COPR and built the Boost 1.60.0 beta, and started rebuilding the
300+ dependent packages. The results of this COPR will be thrown away,
but it means any bugs in the upstream release can be reported and
fixed before the final release (rather than patched in the Fedora
package) and any changes needed in dependent packages will be known
sooner.

Other developers:
* Those who depend on Boost DSOs will have to rebuild their packages.
Feature owners will alleviate some of this work as indicated above,
and will assist those whose packages fail to build in debugging them.
* The proposal owner has already started test rebuilds of affected
packages and identifying the needed changes, and will propose patches
to Boost upstream or to the client packages' upstreams as appropriate.

Policies and guidelines:
* Apart from scope, this is business as usual, so no policies, no guidelines.

Trademark approval:
* N/A (not needed for this Change)

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

F24 System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift

[Jan Kurik]

= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160

Change owner(s):
* Jonathan Wakely 

This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 24. This will mean F24 ships
with the latest upstream Boost release.

== Detailed Description ==
The aim is to synchronize Fedora with the most recent Boost release.
Because ABI stability is one of explicit Boost non-goals, this entails
rebuilding of all dependent packages. This has also always entailed
yours truly assisting maintainers of client packages in decoding
cryptic boostese seen in output from g++. Such care is to be expected
this time around as well.

Boost 1.60 is scheduled for release on 2 Dec 2016 and a beta release
is already available for testing


== Scope ==
Proposal owners:
* Build will be done with Boost.Build v2 (which is upstream-sanctioned
way of building Boost)
* Request a "f24-boost" build system tag (discussion):
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6235 → f24-boost
* Build boost into that tag (take a look at the build #606493 for inspiration)
* Post a request for rebuilds to fedora-devel (XXX link to
fedora-devel message here)
* Work on rebuilding dependent packages in the tag.
* When most is done, re-tag all the packages to rawhide
* Watch fedora-devel and assist in rebuilding broken Boost clients (by
fixing the client, or Boost).

In order to discover any problems ASAP the proposal owner has created
a COPR and built the Boost 1.60.0 beta, and started rebuilding the
300+ dependent packages. The results of this COPR will be thrown away,
but it means any bugs in the upstream release can be reported and
fixed before the final release (rather than patched in the Fedora
package) and any changes needed in dependent packages will be known
sooner.

Other developers:
* Those who depend on Boost DSOs will have to rebuild their packages.
Feature owners will alleviate some of this work as indicated above,
and will assist those whose packages fail to build in debugging them.
* The proposal owner has already started test rebuilds of affected
packages and identifying the needed changes, and will propose patches
to Boost upstream or to the client packages' upstreams as appropriate.

Policies and guidelines:
* Apart from scope, this is business as usual, so no policies, no guidelines.

Trademark approval:
* N/A (not needed for this Change)

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: wayland in rawhide

[Steve Clark]

On 11/20/2015 09:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:

On 12 November 2015 at 14:59, Ray Strode  wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Jared K. Smith
 wrote:

I've been testing Wayland myself since around the F22 time period, but
"middle click paste" and the occasional odd bug keep annoying me enough to
go back to X.  Can you elaborate on the plans for supporting middle click to
paste, or is it considered a relic of a bygone era and I should try to
unlearn?

Plans for middle-click paste are tracked here:

https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/PrimarySelection


This would actually be quite a productivity killer for me, not just
the lack of middle-button paste[1], but also removing a separate
copy-buffer. It is seriously useful to be able to carry around
multiple pieces of text, particularly if you're going to need to
keeping one and change the other (or working on two things at once).

[1] Apparently middle mouse buttons are rare. I'm in an office
surrounded by them and them only computers I've used without one for
roughly the past decade are my old laptop (now moved on, but had
emulated middle click, maybe the wayland developers were unaware of
this too), and other people's mac laptops, which have their own
'easter egg' combinations of one, two, three(?) finger clicks and
drags.


I just did a quick walk around our office of approximately 70 people and every 
mouse had 3 buttons.
As far as the middle button paste being an "easter-egg" it was documented in the "X 
Windows Systems User Guide"
on page 97 way back in 1990.


--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Disabling predictable interface names

[Dusty Mabe]

On 11/20/2015 05:10 AM, wheelz wrote:

You need to run dracut to rebuild initramfs, or you wait for the next kernel > 
update.


Thanks wheelz. I'll have to look into that.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[EPEL-devel]Re: When will 7.2 be in EPEL7 buildroot?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:31:12 -0700
Orion Poplawski  wrote:

> On 11/18/2015 03:24 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > python-jsonpointer is going into base with 7.2, so it needs to be
> > retired from EPEL7[*]
> > Before doing that, I wanted to check when will be 7.2 imported to
> > Koji, so we don't end up with broken builldroots?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> > 
> > [*] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249138  
> 
> Kevin just imported 7.2.

Right. We usually sync and enable the new releases the day they are
public. 

kevin


pgpnJOwWkIRfH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]Re: Centos 7, 32 bits edition

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:50:31 -
zika...@yahoo.com wrote:

> Hi everybody
> 
> Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when
> EPEL packages will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ?

Not really. I think the next plan was to look at enabling ppc64le and
see how that goes, then take what we have learned from that and do
i686. 

kevin


pgp38P80yHWVf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 256  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 152  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813   
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
  60  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8155   
nagios-4.0.8-1.el7
  48  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-925e9374c9   
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el7
  24  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-234553a060   
mediawiki123-1.23.11-1.el7
  24  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-ad1b660a4d   
php-ZendFramework-1.12.16-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-97e247eb19   
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f75cdd1774   
metis-5.1.0-7.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4b33ee7c84   
wildmagic5-5.13-12.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e1379fc854   
owncloud-8.0.9-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-693544258f   
telegram-cli-1.3.1-7.20150730git2052f4.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7b2b7d02df   
quassel-0.11.1-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8a26d71e56   
pdns-3.4.7-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-da5a65c143   
zarafa-7.1.14-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c399ccf199   
sundials-2.6.2-11.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-914de61c66   
potrace-1.13-2.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-ed2e71927f   
imapsync-1.644-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

elasticdump-0.16.1-1.el7
firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-1.el7
geany-plugins-1.26-1.el7
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06-3.el7
python-marshmallow-2.0.0-0.6.gita8b3385.el7
webfts-2.2.5-1.el7
yad-0.32.0-1.el7

Details about builds:



 elasticdump-0.16.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6ccc3fdd6c)
 Import and export tools for elasticsearch

Update Information:

Update to 0.16.1

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1281975 - elasticdump-v0.16.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281975




 firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e6b72d4741)
 SQL relational database management system

Update Information:

update to 2.5.5




 geany-plugins-1.26-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4ef5f9a7ce)
 Plugins for Geany

Update Information:

New upstream release: Geany-Plugins 1.26




 perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0e2d9264f1)
 PostgreSQL runner for Perl tests

Update Information:

This new package provides PostgreSQL runner for Perl tests.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1282842 - perl-Test-PostgreSQL: please add epel7 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282842




 python-marshmallow-2.0.0-0.6.gita8b3385.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6224723ecd)
 Python library for converting complex datatypes to and from primitive types

Update Information:

new package




 webfts-2.2.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-071d7c70ea)
 Web Interface for FTS

Update Information:

first Fedora release

[Bug 1282842] perl-Test-PostgreSQL: please add epel7 branch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282842

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update perl-Test-PostgreSQL'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0e2d9264f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]Re: Centos 7, 32 bits edition

[Peter Robinson]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:50:31 -
> zika...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody
>>
>> Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when
>> EPEL packages will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ?
>
> Not really. I think the next plan was to look at enabling ppc64le and
> see how that goes, then take what we have learned from that and do
> i686.

And I'm dealing with the process and write up of the general direction
of that at the moment, was planning on sending out an email outline
the initial rough plan this evening.

Peter
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47840 - lib389 - fix regression when using /sbin scripts

[Mark Reynolds]

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47840

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47840/0001-Ticket-47840-Fix-regression.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Proposed Mass Bug Filing: Python 3 Porting

[Petr Viktorin]

Hello!

According to the Python packaging guidelines [*], software must be
packaged for Python 3 if upstream supports it. I would like to start
filing some cookie-cutter bugs [**] where that's not the case, or where
there are some common problems with the Python 3 porting.

Some people have already started doing this, especially during the
Fedora Activity Day (FAD) [***], but some of the bugs filed could be
clearer. Hopefully, going through the mass bug filing procedure will
raise the quality of these bug reports, and provide a single place to
track them.
This also means I don't have a list of packages this mass filing applies
to: usually where the issue is known, a bug was already filed. But many
more are surely left to report. Rumor has it that the next FAD is
already being planned; it would be nice to be ready for mass filing at
least by then.

Several different issues related to this are appearing in the wild. I'd
like to put them all under this umbrella, and I'm including bug report
text for each one below.

[*] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
[**] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mass_bug_filing
[***] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Python_3_Porting_2015


Proposed "Python 3 Porting Tracking bug" description:

"""
Bugs related to the Python 3 porting effort are tracked here. These are:

* No py3 subpackage where upstream supports py3
* No python2-* or python-* Provides
* Requires on both py2 and py3 in one RPM

Mass bug filing was discussed in  and announced in 

Python packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
"""


Proposed child bug titles and texts:

1. : Provide a Python 3 subpackage

"""
Upstream, this software supports for Python 3. Please provide a Python 3
package for Fedora.


According to the Python packaging guidelines [0], software must be
packaged for Python 3 if upstream supports it.
The guidelines give detailed information on how to do this, and even
provide an example spec file [1].

The current best practice is to provide subpackages for the two Python
versions (called "Common SRPM" in the guidelines). Alternatively, if
nothing depends on your Python2 package, you can just switch to Python 3
entirely.

It's fine to do this in Rawhide only.


If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance with the
porting, you can ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here.
We'll be happy to help!


[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file
"""


2. : Missing "python2-" provide

"""
This package does not provide "python2-".

As per Python packaging guidelines [0], when there are two versions of
module "foo", the two packages must provide:
"python3-foo" for Python 3
"python2-foo" for Python 2
"python-foo" for the system default Python (currently 2, but this might
change in the future)

Please use the %python_provide macro [1] to specify the correct provides.

It's fine to do this in Rawhide only.


If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance with this
issue, you can ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here.
We'll be happy to help!


[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#The_.25python_provide_macro
"""


3. : Missing "python-" provide

(as for 2., s/python2-/python-/ where necessary)


4. :  requires both Python 2 and Python 3

"""
The  RPM requires both Python 2 and Python 3.

Except in very special circumstances, there is no need for one package
to drag in both Python stacks. Usually, this is a packaging error: for
example, a stray "/usr/bin/python" shebang in a Python 3 package can
introduce a Python 2 dependency.

Please split your package, or remove the stray dependencies.

It's fine to do this in Rawhide only.


If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance, you can
ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here. We'll be happy
to help investigating or fixing this issue!
"""


-- 
Petr Viktorin
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[EPEL-devel]Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 152  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828   
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
 135  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031   
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
 129  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
  60  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8148   
optipng-0.7.5-5.el6
  60  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8156   
nagios-4.0.8-1.el6
  48  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-68a2c2db36   
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el6
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-28606b6d1d   
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.el6.1
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-5d63583df0   
metis-5.1.0-7.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e195439195   
drupal7-jquery_update-2.7-1.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-967595b7c1   
wildmagic5-5.13-12.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-d47ae2d16b   
owncloud-7.0.11-1.el6
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-a7d37297d4   
telegram-cli-1.3.1-7.20150730git2052f4.el6
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0ae4daf2d6   
tubo-5.0.15-3.el6
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b4ebe76583   
putty-0.63-5.el6
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-20cb365c26   
zarafa-7.1.14-1.el6
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-260d131310   
libpng10-1.0.64-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8161a5151b   
ProDy-1.7.1-1.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b76c1e5912   
potrace-1.13-2.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-2fad2e45f6   
monitorix-3.8.1-1.el6
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-301894c7c3   
MUMPS-5.0.1-5.el6
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-49101d6eb9   
imapsync-1.644-2.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-1.el6
python-marshmallow-2.0.0-0.6.gita8b3385.el6
webfts-2.2.5-1.el6

Details about builds:



 firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-19414a6e8d)
 SQL relational database management system

Update Information:

Upstream bugfix release




 python-marshmallow-2.0.0-0.6.gita8b3385.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-68ab41a4f9)
 Python library for converting complex datatypes to and from primitive types

Update Information:

new package




 webfts-2.2.5-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-08a703c03b)
 Web Interface for FTS

Update Information:

first Fedora release

___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:32:59 +0100
Petr Spacek  wrote:

> I would say nothing... Following playbook snippet is just enough to
> go from bare minimal Fedora 23 to Fedora 23 which can run Ansible
> modules:
> 
> - hosts: vm_templates
>   gather_facts: False
>   tasks:
>   - name: install packages for ansible support
> raw: dnf -y install python python2-dnf

Sure, but it's not idempotent.

Having a group available at the install step I think is still handy,
because if you know you are going to be using ansible you can just add
that group from the list of groups on the dvd.
 
> Maybe we can get a patch to ansible which prints a useful hint when
> Python 2 interpreter is not found on the target system?
> 
> I mean something like:
> "Huh, there is no Python 2 on the system .
> Please use gather_facts: False & raw module to install Python 2
> package."
> 
> It would help even to users who do not use kickstarts, e.g. when you
> download a image from somewhere and it does not work with Ansible by
> default.

Sure, sounds like a nice RFE upstream. :) 

kevin 



pgpcVCCr472OD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

[Adam Miller]

Hello all,
After consideration and discussion of feedback from this thread
with members of the Fedora Infrastructure and Fedora Apps team
(special thanks to pingou and threebean), the following is the
proposal we'd like to move forward with:

DistGit Restructure/Namespace
  - Move all current rpm packages that live under repositories/ to
live under repositories/rpms/
  - Create new namespaces for other things (i.e. - repositories/docker/)


Current DistGit layout:
/srv/git/repositories/.git
future:
-> /srv/git/repositories/rpms/.git
(symlinked to the old location for a migration time period)
=> At one point, will break `git pull` if the remote url isn't fixed
-> /srv/git/repositories/docker/.git
=> /srv/git/repositories//.git

This will require updates to different aspects of the Fedora
Apps/Infrastructure over time which will be addressed in phases.
Everything will continue to function with business as usual during the
transition periods with the symlinks in place for backwards
compatibility.

In the future, users of fedpkg can do the following:

fedpkg clone /

Examples:

fedpkg clone rpms/foo
fedpkg clone docker/bar

In the event the namespace is omitted, fedpkg will default to rpms/foo
in order to maintain function-alike backwards compatibility.

If this proposal is agreed upon by general consensus, the teams
involved will begin to scope out what systems need what modifications
and begin the migration, with updates along the way (in case folks are
interested).

I look forward to feedback, thank you.

-AdamM
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 20/11/15 17:54 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:28:45 +0100
Jan Kurik  wrote:


= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160

Change owner(s):
* Jonathan Wakely 

This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 24. This will mean F24 ships
with the latest upstream Boost release.

== Detailed Description ==
The aim is to synchronize Fedora with the most recent Boost release.
Because ABI stability is one of explicit Boost non-goals, this entails
rebuilding of all dependent packages. This has also always entailed
yours truly assisting maintainers of client packages in decoding
cryptic boostese seen in output from g++. Such care is to be expected
this time around as well.

Boost 1.60 is scheduled for release on 2 Dec 2016 and a beta release
is already available for testing


shouldn't the year be 2015?


You mean Fedora won't wait a year for the Boost release?! ;-)

The date is fixed on the wiki page now.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1282842] perl-Test-PostgreSQL: please add epel7 branch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282842



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update perl-Test-PostgreSQL'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0e2d9264f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel]Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 256  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 152  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813   
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
  60  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8155   
nagios-4.0.8-1.el7
  48  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-925e9374c9   
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el7
  24  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-234553a060   
mediawiki123-1.23.11-1.el7
  24  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-ad1b660a4d   
php-ZendFramework-1.12.16-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-97e247eb19   
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f75cdd1774   
metis-5.1.0-7.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4b33ee7c84   
wildmagic5-5.13-12.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e1379fc854   
owncloud-8.0.9-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-693544258f   
telegram-cli-1.3.1-7.20150730git2052f4.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7b2b7d02df   
quassel-0.11.1-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8a26d71e56   
pdns-3.4.7-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-da5a65c143   
zarafa-7.1.14-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c399ccf199   
sundials-2.6.2-11.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-914de61c66   
potrace-1.13-2.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-ed2e71927f   
imapsync-1.644-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

elasticdump-0.16.1-1.el7
firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-1.el7
geany-plugins-1.26-1.el7
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06-3.el7
python-marshmallow-2.0.0-0.6.gita8b3385.el7
webfts-2.2.5-1.el7
yad-0.32.0-1.el7

Details about builds:



 elasticdump-0.16.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6ccc3fdd6c)
 Import and export tools for elasticsearch

Update Information:

Update to 0.16.1

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1281975 - elasticdump-v0.16.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281975




 firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e6b72d4741)
 SQL relational database management system

Update Information:

update to 2.5.5




 geany-plugins-1.26-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4ef5f9a7ce)
 Plugins for Geany

Update Information:

New upstream release: Geany-Plugins 1.26




 perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0e2d9264f1)
 PostgreSQL runner for Perl tests

Update Information:

This new package provides PostgreSQL runner for Perl tests.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1282842 - perl-Test-PostgreSQL: please add epel7 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282842




 python-marshmallow-2.0.0-0.6.gita8b3385.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6224723ecd)
 Python library for converting complex datatypes to and from primitive types

Update Information:

new package




 webfts-2.2.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-071d7c70ea)
 Web Interface for FTS

Update Information:

first Fedora release

numpy-1.10.2-0.1rc1

[Antonio Trande]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi all,

latest 'numpy' release (1.10.2-0.1rc1) seems prevent the building of a
new python package in rawhide
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354):

> [1/1] Cythonizing assimulo/lib/sundials_kinsol_core.pyx Traceback
> (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 509, in  
> ext_list += prepare.fortran_extensionlists() File "setup.py", line
> 427, in fortran_extensionlists if StrictVersion(np.version.version)
> > StrictVersion("1.6.1"): File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/version.py", line 40, in __init__ 
> self.parse(vstring) File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/version.py", line 107, in parse 
> raise ValueError, "invalid version number '%s'" % vstring 
> ValueError: invalid version number '1.10.2rc1' error: Bad exit
> status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.s0lRAq (%build) Bad exit status from
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.s0lRAq (%build)
> 
> I don't know yet from where '1.10.2rc1' comes. I'm trying to
> contact upstream maintainer.
> 

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8811/11838811/build.log

Maybe this type of caption (0.1rc1) is not swallowed by the code.
'assimulo' is rebuilt successfully in a mock rawhide-tree by
downgrading 'numpy' to the 1.10.1-6 release.

Any suggestion? (upstream has already been contacted, uselessly)

- -- 
Antonio Trande

mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWT2y+AAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8BPAH/02ccNwhJ7hCSU1K3h4aF18z
rbj8kBAjj7Adp+x79p++24lWUeoDpi+F0tzICfIaVko7DfT+JMK228Z9vHDhb9Zo
NGzcFbOHAKeCi/siftx3uCc8XBcu3G8y4zehKHRi6bH7BSSHP/bt2MFZhxrRZDve
upkhAp1oINxlZdJLtma+ozKpFOyWz4fn42sdLIgHI2Xc1Psbt9WDDgKCX2uQ7Fjh
bi+kw9NXVryUz1fgHVXXLTO68chZiQErRjuoFETfGY+fe/c927rNUWQ+XAb4FSNy
oTz6/XDVZj3KLHkOO55E4PEM+g55ssZA3cKj/YNcW1kvH0hcug+A62C9PyX7EOU=
=27KY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1282914] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Translit - Transliterates text between writing systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.22-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b89a8a7be7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282914] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Translit - Transliterates text between writing systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.22-2.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
5. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b025075c9c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282914] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Translit - Transliterates text between writing systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.22-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b89a8a7be7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282914] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Translit - Transliterates text between writing systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.22-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-456947b83d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282914] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Translit - Transliterates text between writing systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.22-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-456947b83d

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.22-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-cd0119af4f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282917] Review Request: perl-Test-mysqld - Mysqld runner for tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-64d8af63fd

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-28a2e8cb96

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282917] Review Request: perl-Test-mysqld - Mysqld runner for tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3f58717566

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282917] Review Request: perl-Test-mysqld - Mysqld runner for tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-64d8af63fd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282917] Review Request: perl-Test-mysqld - Mysqld runner for tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3f58717566

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9dd68c38cd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: numpy-1.10.2-0.1rc1

[Orion Poplawski]

On 11/20/2015 11:56 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> latest 'numpy' release (1.10.2-0.1rc1) seems prevent the building of a
> new python package in rawhide
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354):
> 
>> [1/1] Cythonizing assimulo/lib/sundials_kinsol_core.pyx Traceback
>> (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 509, in  
>> ext_list += prepare.fortran_extensionlists() File "setup.py", line
>> 427, in fortran_extensionlists if StrictVersion(np.version.version)
>>> StrictVersion("1.6.1"): File
>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/version.py", line 40, in __init__ 
>> self.parse(vstring) File
>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/version.py", line 107, in parse 
>> raise ValueError, "invalid version number '%s'" % vstring 
>> ValueError: invalid version number '1.10.2rc1' error: Bad exit
>> status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.s0lRAq (%build) Bad exit status from
>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.s0lRAq (%build)
>>
>> I don't know yet from where '1.10.2rc1' comes. I'm trying to
>> contact upstream maintainer.
>>
> 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8811/11838811/build.log
> 
> Maybe this type of caption (0.1rc1) is not swallowed by the code.
> 'assimulo' is rebuilt successfully in a mock rawhide-tree by
> downgrading 'numpy' to the 1.10.1-6 release.
> 
> Any suggestion? (upstream has already been contacted, uselessly)

My comments in the bug:

assimulo is using StrictVersion(np.version.version).  StrictVersion does not
allow for "rc" suffixes - see
http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/stdlib/distutils.version.StrictVersion-class.html

But I think this in entirely assimulo's problem for using StrictVersion -
obviously numpy isn't following those rules.  Maybe they should or might like
to, but I don't know.  I've asked:
https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2015-November/074233.html


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301   http://www.nwra.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

perl-CryptX package

[Denis Fateyev]

Hello there,

I'm going to package CryptX Perl module [1] soon.

The only concern is that it contains a lot of XS-based code of ciphers and
hashes that can be probably considered as bundled. Mostly the used
routines, including sha1, sha2 and md5 implementations, are based on
LibTomCrypt library [2, 3].

Neither this library components nor all algo related are mentioned in
Bundled library policies [4]. So the question is: should we threat this
very case as bundled libs presence? Are there any objections against this
module to be packaged "as is", in its current state?

Thanks,

[1] https://metacpan.org/pod/CryptX

[2] http://www.libtom.net

[3] https://github.com/libtom/libtomcrypt

[4]
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries=406058

-- 
wbr, Denis.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282911] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Salsa20 - Encrypt data with the Salsa20 cipher

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282911



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-Salsa20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

[Orion Poplawski]

I'll be updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide in the next few days.  This
includes a soname bump for the C++ wrapper libs, but as usual I'll be
rebuilding all deps due to run-time version checking by the library.

bes-3.14.0-7.fc24.src.rpm
CBFlib-0.9.5.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
cgnslib-3.2.1-5.fc23.src.rpm
engrid-2.0.0-0.8.gitbaef0ce.fc24.src.rpm
Field3D-1.6.1-8.fc24.src.rpm
gdal-2.0.1-2.fc24.src.rpm
gdl-0.9.5-10.fc24.src.rpm
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-16.fc24.src.rpm
grads-2.0.2-13.fc23.src.rpm
gtatool-2.1.0-9.fc24.src.rpm
h5py-2.5.0-5.fc24.src.rpm
InsightToolkit-4.8.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
jhdf5-2.11.0-3.fc23.src.rpm
kst-2.0.8-4.fc23.src.rpm
libASL-0.1.6-1.fc24.src.rpm
mathgl-2.3-11.fc24.src.rpm
matio-1.5.2-7.fc23.src.rpm
med-3.0.8-4.fc23.src.rpm
mrpt-1.3.0-2.fc24.src.rpm
ncl-6.3.0-6.fc24.src.rpm
netcdf-4.3.3.1-7.fc24.src.rpm
octave-4.0.0-7.fc24.src.rpm
octave-communications-1.2.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
OpenImageIO-1.5.20-2.fc24.src.rpm
paraview-4.4.0-2.fc24.src.rpm
python-tables-3.2.2-2.fc24.src.rpm
R-Rsolid-0.9.31-16.fc23.src.rpm
scilab-6.0.0-0.2.alpha1.fc24.src.rpm
shogun-4.0.1-0.1.git20150808.779c3ad.fc24.src.rpm
vigra-1.10.0-15.fc24.src.rpm
vips-8.1.1-2.fc24.src.rpm
ViTables-2.1-12.fc23.src.rpm
vtk-6.3.0-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301   http://www.nwra.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1284141] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1097370
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1097370=edit
[patch] Update to 5.20151120 (#1284141)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1284141] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141

Bug ID: 1284141
   Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151120 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Module-CoreList
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 5.20151120
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20151020-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-CoreList/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283965] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283965

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.20-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ffdfca8c41

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283449] perl-Socket-2.021 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283449



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Socket-2.021-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Socket'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-e75f593a13

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 17:28 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: 
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:00:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 
> > > OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of
> > > "modules
> > > like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those modules share
> > > in
> > > common that we can define clearly and concisely and in a way
> > > there
> > > won't be any serious dispute over?
> > 
> > Maybe "packages needed to be able to to use and configure the
> > default
> > package manager". For example one might need to be able to adjust
> > the
> > dnf repo config to be able to actually install pkgs, if there is a
> > restrictive firewall for example and only local mirrors are
> > accessible
> > or a proxy has to be used.
> 
> I would say "packages needed to be able to install software and then
> do
> basic configuration of the system" - this would be:
> 
> - $package_manager
> - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_system_mo
> dules.html
> - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_files_mod
> ules.html

That seems viable, sure. +1. Would you like to add a comment in comps
and update the group with the appropriate packages, or shall I? Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Test-Announce]2015-11-23 @ 1700 Fedora 24 Blocker Review

[Adam Williamson]

# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-11-23
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! I think it's time we run the first blocker review meeting of
the F24 cycle. There are a couple of proposed blockers to go through,
so we may as well get started early and keep on top of them. Remember,
daylight savings has ended since the last blocker review of the F23
cycle, so we're now at 1700 UTC - if your area observes daylight
savings, this will be the same local time as before, one hour after the
QA meeting.

If you have time this weekend, to take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full list can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F24 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good weekend and see you Monday!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1267963] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267963

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2   |perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2
   |perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.f |perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.f
   |c23 |c23
   |perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.f |perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.f
   |c22 |c22
   ||perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.f
   ||c21



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1277116] perl-Getopt-Long-2.48 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277116

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2 |perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2
   |4   |4
   |perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2 |perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2
   |3   |3
   |perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2 |perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2
   |2   |2
   ||perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc2
   ||1



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1277116] perl-Getopt-Long-2.48 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277116



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Getopt-Long-2.48-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1267962] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267962



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1163210] perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.12 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163210



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.12-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1163210] perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.12 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163210

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.12-1.
   ||fc21
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-11-20 18:26:21



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce]2015-11-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-11-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

It's QA meeting time again! My non-media blocker process email seems to
have generated a lot of discussion, so it seems like a good idea to
discuss that. I don't have any other topics aside from the usual
suspects, but if anyone else does, please do throw them into the pot!

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Non-media blocker process
3. Open floor
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1267963] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267963



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-IPTables-Parse-1.5-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1284131] New: perl-Term-Size: please add epel7 branch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284131

Bug ID: 1284131
   Summary: perl-Term-Size: please add epel7 branch
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel7
 Component: perl-Term-Size
  Assignee: extras-orp...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-orp...@fedoraproject.org,
k.georg...@atreides.org.uk,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Please add epel7 branch for `perl-Term-Size` package.

Alternatively, in case if nobody interested in maintaining it (since as I can
see el6 was orphaned), I can step in and support epel7.
Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1284138] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284138

Bug ID: 1284138
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.46 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 2.46
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.42-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1284141] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11927285

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

[Petr Spacek]

On 19.11.2015 23:28, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: 
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:00:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of "modules
>>> like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those modules share in
>>> common that we can define clearly and concisely and in a way there
>>> won't be any serious dispute over?
>>
>> Maybe "packages needed to be able to to use and configure the default
>> package manager". For example one might need to be able to adjust the
>> dnf repo config to be able to actually install pkgs, if there is a
>> restrictive firewall for example and only local mirrors are accessible
>> or a proxy has to be used.
> 
> I would say "packages needed to be able to install software and then do
> basic configuration of the system" - this would be:
> 
> - $package_manager
> - core modules from 
> http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_system_modules.html
> - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_files_modules.html

I would say nothing... Following playbook snippet is just enough to go from
bare minimal Fedora 23 to Fedora 23 which can run Ansible modules:

- hosts: vm_templates
  gather_facts: False
  tasks:
  - name: install packages for ansible support
raw: dnf -y install python python2-dnf

Maybe we can get a patch to ansible which prints a useful hint when Python 2
interpreter is not found on the target system?

I mean something like:
"Huh, there is no Python 2 on the system .
Please use gather_facts: False & raw module to install Python 2 package."

It would help even to users who do not use kickstarts, e.g. when you download
a image from somewhere and it does not work with Ansible by default.

-- 
Petr Spacek  @  Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct