Fedora Rawhide-20171022.n.1 compose check report
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 19/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171021.n.0): ID: 160595 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160595 ID: 160610 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160610 ID: 160630 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160630 ID: 160636 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160636 ID: 160637 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160637 ID: 160638 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160638 ID: 160639 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160639 ID: 160686 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160686 ID: 160690 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160690 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171021.n.0): ID: 160590 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160590 ID: 160597 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160597 ID: 160611 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160611 ID: 160613 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160613 ID: 160619 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160619 ID: 160644 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160644 ID: 160645 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160645 ID: 160657 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160657 ID: 160672 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160672 ID: 160680 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160680 ID: 160685 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160685 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/128 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20171021.n.0): ID: 160626 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160626 ID: 160627 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160627 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20171021.n.0): ID: 160647 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160647 ID: 160667 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160667 ID: 160688 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160688 ID: 160689 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160689 Passed openQA tests: 99/128 (x86_64) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20171021.n.0): ID: 160600 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160600 ID: 160621 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160621 ID: 160622 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160622 ID: 160629 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160629 ID: 160631 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160631 ID: 160632 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160632 ID: 160633 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160633 ID: 160634 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160634 ID: 160635 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160635 ID: 160646 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160646 ID: 160653 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160653 ID: 160675 Test: x86_64 universal
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503228] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503228 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-Translit-0.28-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8a25e67197 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505199] New: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505199 Bug ID: 1505199 Summary: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PPIx-EditorTools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.20 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.19-8.fc27 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-EditorTools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3287/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems
El dom, 22-10-2017 a las 11:39 -0400, Randy Barlow escribió: > On 10/22/2017 09:04 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > updates does not have composes it has mashes, the behaviour is > > expected > > to be different, the problem boils down to the fact that if a > > package > > is made multilib indirectly, i.e. it is only pulled in because some > > external package that is multilib requires it, it will only be > > multilib > > in updates or updates-testing if the package requiring it is also > > in > > the same repo. > > Hi Dennis! > > Since Bodhi is planning to switch to using Pungi instead of mash to > generate its repositories "very soon" (potentially as early as > Tuesday > this week if testing and FBRs go well), do you think that will help > resolve this discrepancy? completely unkown at this point of time Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171017.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 27-20171022.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 15/137 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 160360 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160360 ID: 160365 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160365 ID: 160389 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160389 ID: 160391 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160391 ID: 160410 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160410 ID: 160418 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160418 ID: 160420 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160420 ID: 160425 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160425 ID: 160427 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160427 ID: 160431 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160431 ID: 160444 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160444 ID: 160446 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160446 ID: 160449 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160449 ID: 160474 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160474 ID: 160494 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160494 ID: 160497 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160497 ID: 160507 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160507 ID: 160512 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160512 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/137 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 160387 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160387 ID: 160436 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160436 ID: 160461 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160461 ID: 160469 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160469 ID: 160477 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160477 ID: 160479 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160479 Passed openQA tests: 114/137 (x86_64), 20/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 161 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems
On 10/22/2017 09:04 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > updates does not have composes it has mashes, the behaviour is expected > to be different, the problem boils down to the fact that if a package > is made multilib indirectly, i.e. it is only pulled in because some > external package that is multilib requires it, it will only be multilib > in updates or updates-testing if the package requiring it is also in > the same repo. Hi Dennis! Since Bodhi is planning to switch to using Pungi instead of mash to generate its repositories "very soon" (potentially as early as Tuesday this week if testing and FBRs go well), do you think that will help resolve this discrepancy? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmorewrote: > >> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html >> > > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there > were "0 failed builds" :-) Current status? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems
El jue, 19-10-2017 a las 19:29 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió: > On 10/19/2017 06:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > There is long standing 8+ year old bugs we have never gotten around > > to > > to ensure multilib is correct in all cases. It is unfortuantly > > expected > > sometimes, it probably has happened a lot over the yearsm, but > > since > > defaulting to turning off installing multilib by default we have > > not > > had and issues filed in years, until you asked earlier this year. > > we > > may be able to resolve the issues with the move to use pungi for > > updates pushes rather than mashing the repos. > > I'm not sure if it's the same bug. Based on the reports, it feels > like > as if every other compose is broken. Either we have been > exceedingly > unlucky the past week or so, or we're hitting some new issue. > > Thanks, > Florian Florian, updates does not have composes it has mashes, the behaviour is expected to be different, the problem boils down to the fact that if a package is made multilib indirectly, i.e. it is only pulled in because some external package that is multilib requires it, it will only be multilib in updates or updates-testing if the package requiring it is also in the same repo. the way we make the updates and updates-testing repos make the repo and does multilib in isolation, without any consideration for what was multilib in the base repo, as it has no knowledge it even exits, we have had a bug open for ~8 years to fix and until this year when you raised an issue about it had not had any reports of issues since we defaulted to not installing multilib by default. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505141] New: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000082 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505141 Bug ID: 1505141 Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.82 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test2-Suite Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.82 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.80-1.fc28 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test2-Suite/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9536/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505135] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.040 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505135 Bug ID: 1505135 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.040 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PAR-Packer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.040 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.039-1.fc28 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3189/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505126] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126 Bug ID: 1505126 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 5.20171020 Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20170923-1.fc28 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-CoreList/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3080/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505117] New: perl-App-Cme-1.024 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505117 Bug ID: 1505117 Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.024 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-Cme Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.024 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.023-1.fc28 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Cme/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9059/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1504094] perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.427 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504094 Emmanuel Seymanchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-7.48-1.fc2 ||8 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-10-22 05:41:38 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=987376 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org