date:20180820

Fedora 29-20180820.n.1 compose check report

2018-08-20 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 22/130 (x86_64), 8/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 267565  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267565
ID: 267566  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267566
ID: 267577  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267577
ID: 267581  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267581
ID: 267590  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267590
ID: 267591  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267591
ID: 267592  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267592
ID: 267605  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267605
ID: 267606  Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267606
ID: 267608  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267608
ID: 267609  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267609
ID: 267610  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267610
ID: 267614  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267614
ID: 267622  Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267622
ID: 267623  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267623
ID: 267631  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267631
ID: 267639  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267639
ID: 267640  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267640
ID: 267642  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267642
ID: 267669  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267669
ID: 267673  Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267673
ID: 267674  Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267674
ID: 267677  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267677
ID: 267683  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267683
ID: 267686  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267686
ID: 267695  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267695
ID: 267698  Test: i386 universal install_blivet_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267698
ID: 267703  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267703
ID: 267704  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267704
ID: 267708  Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267708
ID: 267712  Test: i386 universal install_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267712

Soft failed openQA tests: 67/130 (x86_64), 14/24 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 267559  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267559
ID: 267560  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267560
ID: 267562  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267562
ID: 267563  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267563
ID: 267572  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267572
ID: 267578  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267578
ID: 267579  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267579
ID: 267585  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267585
ID: 267586  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/267586
ID: 267587  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL:

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180820.n.1 changes

2018-08-20 Thread Fedora Branched Report

OLD: Fedora-29-20180817.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180820.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   122
Downgraded packages: 4

Size of added packages:  320.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   5.56 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 64.33 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   146.98 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 130.73 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: containernetworking-plugins-0.7.3-1.fc29
Summary: Libraries for writing CNI plugin
RPMs:containernetworking-plugins containernetworking-plugins-devel 
containernetworking-plugins-unit-test-devel
Size:75.45 MiB

Package: moby-engine-18.06.0-1.ce.git0ffa825.fc29
Summary: The open-source application container engine
RPMs:moby-engine moby-engine-fish-completion moby-engine-nano 
moby-engine-vim moby-engine-zsh-completion
Size:239.13 MiB

Package: mysql-selinux-1.0.0-3.fc29
Summary: SELinux policies for product
RPMs:mysql-selinux
Size:34.31 KiB

Package: python-inotify_simple-1.1.8-1.fc29
Summary: A simple Python wrapper around inotify
RPMs:python2-inotify_simple python3-inotify_simple
Size:35.18 KiB

Package: python-mplcursors-0.2-2.fc29
Summary: Interactive data selection cursors for Matplotlib
RPMs:python-mplcursors-doc python3-mplcursors
Size:1.18 MiB

Package: python-pyshtools-4.3-1.fc29
Summary: Tools for working with spherical harmonics
RPMs:python3-pyshtools
Size:4.06 MiB

Package: rpmbuild-order-0.2.1-1.fc29
Summary: Order RPM packages by dependencies
RPMs:rpmbuild-order
Size:204.39 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  LibRaw-0.19.0-4.fc29
Old package:  LibRaw-0.19.0-3.fc29
Summary:  Library for reading RAW files obtained from digital photo cameras
RPMs: LibRaw LibRaw-devel LibRaw-samples LibRaw-static
Size: 5.05 MiB
Size change:  -89.97 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Jul 31 2018 Debarshi Ray  - 0.19.0-4
  - Fix License
  - Explicitly enable JPEG and OpenMP support to avoid surprises


Package:  NetworkManager-strongswan-1.4.4-1.fc29
Old package:  NetworkManager-strongswan-1.4.3-1.fc29
Summary:  NetworkManager strongSwan IPSec VPN plug-in
RPMs: NetworkManager-strongswan NetworkManager-strongswan-gnome
Size: 221.33 KiB
Size change:  -10.14 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jul 12 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.4.3-2
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Aug 18 2018 Mikhail Zabaluev  - 1.4.4-1
  - new version


Package:  QuantLib-1.13-1.fc29
Old package:  QuantLib-1.12.1-1.fc29
Summary:  A software framework for quantitative finance
RPMs: QuantLib QuantLib-devel QuantLib-doc QuantLib-test
Size: 75.19 MiB
Size change:  -10.88 MiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jul 12 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.12.1-2
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild

  * Wed Jul 25 2018 Tom Callaway  - 1.13-1
  - update to 1.13
  - add BuildRequires: gcc, gcc-c++
  - man3 files are gone


Package:  R-fansi-0.3.0-1.fc29
Old package:  R-fansi-0.2.3-1.fc29
Summary:  ANSI Control Sequence Aware String Functions
RPMs: R-fansi
Size: 989.90 KiB
Size change:  131.88 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 19 2018 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
0.3.0-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-mockery-0.4.1.1-1.fc29
Old package:  R-mockery-0.4.1-2.fc29
Summary:  Mocking Library for R
RPMs: R-mockery
Size: 51.03 KiB
Size change:  284 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 19 2018 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
0.4.1.1-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-pkgconfig-2.0.2-1.fc29
Old package:  R-pkgconfig-2.0.1-2.fc29
Summary:  Private Configuration for 'R' Packages
RPMs: R-pkgconfig
Size: 27.55 KiB
Size change:  68 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 19 2018 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
2.0.2-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-rlang-0.2.2-1.fc29
Old package:  R-rlang-0.2.1-2.fc29
Summary:  Functions for Base Types and Core R and 'Tidyverse' Features
RPMs: R-rlang
Size: 4.89 MiB
Size change:  -18.34 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 19 2018 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
0.2.2-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-zoo-1.8.3-1.fc29
Old package:  R-zoo-1.8.2-2.fc29
Summary:  Z's ordered observations for irregular time series
RPMs: R-zoo R-zoo-devel
Size: 6.42 MiB
Size change:  -3.33 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 19 2018 Jos?? Matos  - 1.8.3-1
  - update to 1.8-3


Package:  amanda-3.5.1-14.fc29
Old package:  amanda-3.5.1-13.fc29
Summary:  A network-capable tape backup solution
RPMs: amanda amanda-client amanda-libs amanda-server
Size: 12.02 MiB
Size change:  -527.02 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Aug 02 2018 Vaclav Dolezal  - 3.5.1-14
  - modify permissions of /var/log/amanda

[Bug 1613218] Upgrade perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize to 1.50

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613218



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.50-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fada71a439

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OSKHU3QBKABADGJWNNXCPXSULEIOUEKV/

[Bug 1613218] Upgrade perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize to 1.50

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613218



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.50-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-13b5840772

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LIPGPZME5VQ53C7XHK4OIQZWGQ7KKO25/

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-08-21 - 90% PASS

2018-08-20 Thread vashirov

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/08/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.15-20180820gitc393394.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MPIUFA4SZZL2W7O72AVHUTB3355TYDTZ/

[Bug 1619470] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.74 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619470

Bug ID: 1619470
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.74 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 3.74
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.72-1.fc29
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XHEIMP6MNND7E746ANGLMYRMLTTTAZ3O/

[Bug 1619468] New: perl-App-Cme-1.029 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619468

Bug ID: 1619468
   Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.029 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-App-Cme
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 1.029
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.028-3.fc29
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Cme/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/9059/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VE75CJPRSUOJ2HRUO32VZCWTHPOE5RY7/

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

2018-08-20 Thread Amit Saha

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:19 PM Christian Dersch 
wrote:

> Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik  >:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
>> >>
>> >> There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
>> >> libpoppler.so.*.
>> >>
>> >> I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have
>> >> backported/prepared fixes to reflect poppler's API changes.
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, libreoffice does not build currently (#1615616). But
>> I've
>> >> decided to push the rebase though because branching will happen today
>> >> and I could not do chain build after that for F29.
>> >>
>> >> Btw, if your package use the unstable API (headers from poppler-devel),
>> >> could you consider to change it to use a stable API (glib, qt, C++)?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Please do not push this change today. We are going to branch F29 and I'd
>> > really like to not see a whole lot of breakage at the same time.
>> >
>> > It would be best to work out the kinks in Rawhide and then merge them
>> all
>> > at once to F29 between Branching and Beta Freeze.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've already pushed the change to rawhide at night. The only problems
>> are LibreOffice and GDAL now. They don't build from source even without
>> the rebase of poppler.
>> I'm looking at the GDAL now and I see that Caolan has pushed new
>> LibreOffice to rawhide.
>>
>>
> Any news on gdal? This breaks three of the Fedora Spins: Astronomy,
> Robotic and Scientific. So please fix this asap! And please coordinate that
> better next time, poppler is known to break things… Pushing that before
> branching (and mostly without announcement, because there was no time to
> test) was not a good idea :(
>

Thanks for raising.  Asking for Fedora Scientific - should I comment out
packages which needs gdal?


> Greetings
> Christian
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L66GQVQMIQVEHNAVN6PO6UZBMY4MZGBT/
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TPRO753DD36IY45NBPUIRR7YTQUWPG54/

Re: I intent to orphan barman

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 20.8.2018 23:50, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote:

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:


I recently got https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/barman

I will orphan it in a week if nobody wants it.



Please, assign it to me. I'll begin to use barman soon at work, I'll give
love to the package :-)


Done. Thank You.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7IJG6L6RC6KGTXO3Q672Y42EI7Q34N7Z/

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

2018-08-20 Thread jkurik

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-08-21 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 
US/Eastern
   At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.

More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki 
page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Modularity_Working_Group)

The agenda for the meeting is available at [modularity-wg-agendas 
pad](https://board.net/p/modularity-wg-agendas).



Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5249/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JTFUPII2M7E3XYMNRSDTQTVIV2DA6ZQ6/

[HEADS UP] mercurial v4.7 in rawhide

2018-08-20 Thread Petr Stodulka

Hi guys,
mercurial has been rebased to v4.7 which would be incompatible
with RPMs mentioned below. As F30 will be released in winter,
there is a lot of time to find any issues and make other RPMs
working again.

Here is the list of components that depends on mercurial:
  - git-cinnabar
  - gitifyhg
  - git-remote-hg
  - golang
  - gwsmhg
  - hg-git
  - hgsubversion
  - hgsvn
  - hgview
  - python-anyvc
  - python-hgapi
  - python-hghooks
  - python-vcstools
  - python-wstool
  - pyvcs
  - qct
  - rabbitvcs
  - rbm
  - tortoisehg
  - trac-mercurial-plugin

Cheers,
Petr



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J3SFD2RYAOOQ7IR7L53CKNJWRZZERZYT/

Re: I intent to orphan barman

2018-08-20 Thread Francisco J. Tsao Santin

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:

> I recently got https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/barman
> 
> I will orphan it in a week if nobody wants it.
> 

Please, assign it to me. I'll begin to use barman soon at work, I'll give
love to the package :-)

-- 
Francisco Javier Tsao Santín
http://gattaca.es
1024D/71CF4D62  42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D FB___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/STCZHEFASIUPECEB7SGV3PLQVMIOSP4N/

mingw-qt5-qtwebkit FTBFS: C++ struct size question

2018-08-20 Thread Sandro Mani


Hi

I've spent some time debugging mingw-qt5-qtwebkit being FTBFS since the 
last mass rebuild, and I've narrowed it down to this:


struct Foo {
    unsigned u1 : 5;
    unsigned u2 : 5;
    unsigned u3 : 3;
    unsigned u4 : 3;
    unsigned u5 : 4;
    unsigned u6 : 2;
    unsigned u7 : 3;
    unsigned u8 : 2;
    unsigned u9 : 1;

    unsigned u10 : 3;
    // 31 bits
    unsigned u11 : 2;
    unsigned u12 : 2;
    unsigned u13 : 2;

    unsigned u14 : 6;
    unsigned u15 : 7;
    unsigned u16 : 1;
    unsigned u17 : 1;
    unsigned u18 : 1;
    unsigned u19 : 1;
    unsigned u20 : 1;

    bool bar() const { return false; }
private:
    unsigned u21 : 1;
    unsigned u22 : 1;
    unsigned u23 : 1;
    unsigned u24 : 1;
    // 59 bits
};

COMPILE_ASSERT((sizeof(Foo) <= 8), Foo_does_not_grow);

The COMPILE_ASSERT fails, since apparently sizeof(Foo) = 12. But without 
the bool bar() member function, sizeof(Foo) = 8, which is what I would 
expect regardless of the presence of (non-virtual) member functions - as 
far as my C/C++ knowledge goes, non-virtual functions should not take up 
any space. Am I missing something, or is this a compiler issue?


(Coincidentally, the failed build used mingw-gcc-8.1.0 which landed 
before the mass rebuild, but previous (successful) builds were performed 
with mingw-gcc-7.3.0).


Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WWHGSJJZQO2HZDZ6MG32YINHKQ3MQ7LK/

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180816.1

2018-08-20 Thread Dusty Mabe



On 08/20/2018 04:24 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> 
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
> 
> Version: 28.20180816.1
> Commit(x86_64): 
> c6b1e97b93424c260baa98518277d87f7f4ebf036c09a9a0aeb7097c33c2099c
> Commit(aarch64): 
> 28d35c25fecb561a648ef1f3be30906335e91caabfd5afb91ec1e93ea6f0d74b
> Commit(ppc64le): 
> eaa2addd3390c350ca15c65ac48895811fc27e5e65c671934327216d0e51951c
> 
> 
> We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
> that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated
> testing at this time.
> 
> Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host upgrade`.
> 
> Corresponding image media for new installations can be downloaded from:
> 
> https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/download/
> 
> Alternatively, image artifacts can be found at the following links:
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.aarch64.qcow2
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.aarch64.raw.xz
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-aarch64-28-20180816.1.iso
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.ppc64le.qcow2
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.ppc64le.raw.xz
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-ppc64le-28-20180816.1.iso
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.x86_64.qcow2
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.x86_64.raw.xz
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-28-20180816.1.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-28-20180816.1.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-x86_64-28-20180816.1.iso
> 
> Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-aarch64-CHECKSUM
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-aarch64-CHECKSUM
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-ppc64le-CHECKSUM
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-ppc64le-CHECKSUM
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-x86_64-CHECKSUM
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-x86_64-CHECKSUM
> 
> For direct download, the "latest" targets are always available here:
> x86_64:
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_x86_64_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_x86_64_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_x86_64_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_x86_64_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_x86_64_latest
> 
> aarch64:
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_aarch64_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_aarch64_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_aarch64_latest
> 
> ppc64le:
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_ppc64le_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_ppc64le_latest
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_ppc64le_latest
> 
> Filename fetching URLs are available here:
> x86_64:
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_x86_64_latest_filename
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_x86_64_latest_filename
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_x86_64_latest_filename
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_x86_64_latest_filename
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_x86_64_latest_filename
> 
> aarch64:
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_aarch64_latest_filename
> https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_aarch64_latest_filename
>

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

2018-08-20 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet

On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 11:17 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
> 
> Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with
> some
> security fixes. Not sure if the API changed or anything like that as
> their changelog is pretty terse.

Looks like it changed from libpoppler.so.79 from so.78...

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PT4TF4G6CDR5ETVCHGKVBLFLY2H5FKLG/

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-20 Thread Omair Majid

* Michael Cronenworth  [2018-08-15 10:19]:
> On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well.
> 
> The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but subsequent
> builds are supposed to build from source. The problem is that we can't build
> without the binaries at all. The Roslyn compiler requires the "msbuild"
> tool, which hasn't been successfully built from source.
> 
> I don't have the time to lend, but if others are willing to step in that 
> would be great.

It's possible to build msbuild (and .NET Core) from source here:
https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/

But then there's the recursive problem of building all those binary
(nuget) packages that source-build needs, from source.

We are working on trying to improve .NET Core (including msbuild) and
bring it to a point where it can be added to Fedora proper, but it's a
fairly long term goal.

Omair

-- 
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/35JKDUW64NORTWV4YTIH4WOMOLI34IEA/

Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Mass Python 2 Package Removal

2018-08-20 Thread Ben Cotton

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal

== Summary ==
(Sub-)packages only providing python2 importable modules without
additional functionality will be removed from Fedora unless some other
package(s) depends on them.

Python 2 will be deprecated in Fedora. Packagers can mark any other
Python 2 packages as deprecated as well.

== Owner ==
* Miro Hrončok (Churchyard)
* Petr Viktorin (Pviktori)
* Charalampos Stratakis (Cstratak)
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (Zbyszek)
* Igor Gantenko (Ignatenkobrain)
* Neal Gompa (Ngompa)

== Detailed Description ==
Python 2 reaches End of Life on 2020-01-01. Its current maintainers
would like to orphan it before that date, and so far no one else has
stepped up to maintain Python 2 (with the full ecosystem) past 2020.
Since thousands of packages still depend on python2, we need a more
careful approach than normal orphaning.
Some of those packages are abandoned and/or the Python 2 version is
unnecessary. Others are useful and just need more time to port to
Python 3.
Hence we set up criteria for python2 packages that can remain in the
distribution and we remove everything else. This should allow us to
keep python2 for limited use, not break everything, but should also
send a strong message that it is no longer a first class citizen, and
filter packages we need to focus Python 3 porting efforts on.

(Sub-)packages that only provide a python2 importable module, and are
not required for other packages, will be removed.

Examples of situations where a (sub-)package does not provide only the
importable module:

* A package also provides an application, mostly likely in /usr/bin,
/usr/libexec...
** (Note that according to current guidelines, if the Python 3 version
of a package provides the same functionality, the Python 3 package
should provide the application.)
** (In certain situations the provided application is only useful to
boostrap or manage projects using the module. Such applications don't
count.)
* A package provides a plugin for another application, most likely
trough a setuptools entrypoint interface or some custom location on
disk.

Our process will be:

* File bugs for all packages that look like they only provide a Python
2 importable module. (This includes those needed by other packages we
plan to remove.)
* Leave at least a week for packagers to respond to the bugs.
* If the packager approves or there is no response for a week, we will
remove the package.

There are currently ~3000 source packages that generate python2 dependent RPMs.
Automation is being created to be able to provide us a rough list of
packages to remove.

=== Packages to remove ===
The list is at 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal/List
not to disturb the reading experience of this page.

Packagers can block some packages from removal by responding on
Bugzilla and providing reasons. If no general consensus is reached,
FESCo will decide (as Python SIG does not have a formal process for
such decisions).

We'll also actively try to remove unused or optional dependencies to
reduce the number of packages that need to be kept because other
packages depend on them.

As dependencies evolve over time, we will regularly repeat this proces
on rawhide from now on even on future releases.

Packagers are strongly encouraged to help port their applications to
Python 3. Removing old Python 2 only applications from Fedora is also
encouraged, especially if the upstream is dead. Python SIG is
available to help with porting.

Packaging guidelines will be updated to reflect that packaging for
Python 3 only is the default. Instructions for Python 2 and
dual-support will be moved to the Appendix.

Python 2 will be marked deprecated (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages).

Any package that only provides a Python 2 importable module may be
marked as deprecated as well if the maintainer(s) want to.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
A giant pile of unneeded software running on a legacy interperter will
be removed from Fedora before the interpreter stops being supported
upstream.

While we would very much like to remove Python 2 entirely, this way we
are not breaking Fedora, and we can accomodate some exceptions.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
** Provide a list of packages to remove
** Collect feedback from affected packagers
** Retire the python2 only packages
** Remove python2 subpackages from dual-python packages

* Other developers:
** Ask for packages to be removed from the list if needed (with reasons).
** Remove python2 subpackages from dual-python packages (not needed,
but helpful)
** Optionaly mark remainign python2 packages deprecated

* Policies and guidelines:
** Python packaging guidelines will be changed to only describe Python 3
** Python 2 and dual-support packaging will be moved to the appendix
** Only packages providing additional features different than
importable modules will be allowed to be added in Fedora (with

Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Mass Python 2 Package Removal

2018-08-20 Thread Ben Cotton

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal

== Summary ==
(Sub-)packages only providing python2 importable modules without
additional functionality will be removed from Fedora unless some other
package(s) depends on them.

Python 2 will be deprecated in Fedora. Packagers can mark any other
Python 2 packages as deprecated as well.

== Owner ==
* Miro Hrončok (Churchyard)
* Petr Viktorin (Pviktori)
* Charalampos Stratakis (Cstratak)
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (Zbyszek)
* Igor Gantenko (Ignatenkobrain)
* Neal Gompa (Ngompa)

== Detailed Description ==
Python 2 reaches End of Life on 2020-01-01. Its current maintainers
would like to orphan it before that date, and so far no one else has
stepped up to maintain Python 2 (with the full ecosystem) past 2020.
Since thousands of packages still depend on python2, we need a more
careful approach than normal orphaning.
Some of those packages are abandoned and/or the Python 2 version is
unnecessary. Others are useful and just need more time to port to
Python 3.
Hence we set up criteria for python2 packages that can remain in the
distribution and we remove everything else. This should allow us to
keep python2 for limited use, not break everything, but should also
send a strong message that it is no longer a first class citizen, and
filter packages we need to focus Python 3 porting efforts on.

(Sub-)packages that only provide a python2 importable module, and are
not required for other packages, will be removed.

Examples of situations where a (sub-)package does not provide only the
importable module:

* A package also provides an application, mostly likely in /usr/bin,
/usr/libexec...
** (Note that according to current guidelines, if the Python 3 version
of a package provides the same functionality, the Python 3 package
should provide the application.)
** (In certain situations the provided application is only useful to
boostrap or manage projects using the module. Such applications don't
count.)
* A package provides a plugin for another application, most likely
trough a setuptools entrypoint interface or some custom location on
disk.

Our process will be:

* File bugs for all packages that look like they only provide a Python
2 importable module. (This includes those needed by other packages we
plan to remove.)
* Leave at least a week for packagers to respond to the bugs.
* If the packager approves or there is no response for a week, we will
remove the package.

There are currently ~3000 source packages that generate python2 dependent RPMs.
Automation is being created to be able to provide us a rough list of
packages to remove.

=== Packages to remove ===
The list is at 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal/List
not to disturb the reading experience of this page.

Packagers can block some packages from removal by responding on
Bugzilla and providing reasons. If no general consensus is reached,
FESCo will decide (as Python SIG does not have a formal process for
such decisions).

We'll also actively try to remove unused or optional dependencies to
reduce the number of packages that need to be kept because other
packages depend on them.

As dependencies evolve over time, we will regularly repeat this proces
on rawhide from now on even on future releases.

Packagers are strongly encouraged to help port their applications to
Python 3. Removing old Python 2 only applications from Fedora is also
encouraged, especially if the upstream is dead. Python SIG is
available to help with porting.

Packaging guidelines will be updated to reflect that packaging for
Python 3 only is the default. Instructions for Python 2 and
dual-support will be moved to the Appendix.

Python 2 will be marked deprecated (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages).

Any package that only provides a Python 2 importable module may be
marked as deprecated as well if the maintainer(s) want to.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
A giant pile of unneeded software running on a legacy interperter will
be removed from Fedora before the interpreter stops being supported
upstream.

While we would very much like to remove Python 2 entirely, this way we
are not breaking Fedora, and we can accomodate some exceptions.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
** Provide a list of packages to remove
** Collect feedback from affected packagers
** Retire the python2 only packages
** Remove python2 subpackages from dual-python packages

* Other developers:
** Ask for packages to be removed from the list if needed (with reasons).
** Remove python2 subpackages from dual-python packages (not needed,
but helpful)
** Optionaly mark remainign python2 packages deprecated

* Policies and guidelines:
** Python packaging guidelines will be changed to only describe Python 3
** Python 2 and dual-support packaging will be moved to the appendix
** Only packages providing additional features different than
importable modules will be allowed to be added in Fedora (with

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180816.1

2018-08-20 Thread noreply


A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:

Version: 28.20180816.1
Commit(x86_64): c6b1e97b93424c260baa98518277d87f7f4ebf036c09a9a0aeb7097c33c2099c
Commit(aarch64): 
28d35c25fecb561a648ef1f3be30906335e91caabfd5afb91ec1e93ea6f0d74b
Commit(ppc64le): 
eaa2addd3390c350ca15c65ac48895811fc27e5e65c671934327216d0e51951c


We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated
testing at this time.

Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host upgrade`.

Corresponding image media for new installations can be downloaded from:

https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/download/

Alternatively, image artifacts can be found at the following links:
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.aarch64.qcow2
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.aarch64.raw.xz
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-aarch64-28-20180816.1.iso
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.ppc64le.qcow2
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.ppc64le.raw.xz
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-ppc64le-28-20180816.1.iso
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.x86_64.qcow2
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1.x86_64.raw.xz
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-28-20180816.1.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-28-20180816.1.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-x86_64-28-20180816.1.iso

Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-aarch64-CHECKSUM
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/aarch64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-aarch64-CHECKSUM
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-ppc64le-CHECKSUM
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-ppc64le-CHECKSUM
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-x86_64-CHECKSUM
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-28-updates-20180816.1/AtomicHost/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180816.1-x86_64-CHECKSUM

For direct download, the "latest" targets are always available here:
x86_64:
https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_x86_64_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_x86_64_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_x86_64_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_x86_64_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_x86_64_latest

aarch64:
https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_aarch64_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_aarch64_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_aarch64_latest

ppc64le:
https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_ppc64le_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_ppc64le_latest
https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_ppc64le_latest

Filename fetching URLs are available here:
x86_64:
https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_x86_64_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_x86_64_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_x86_64_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_x86_64_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_x86_64_latest_filename

aarch64:
https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_aarch64_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_aarch64_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_aarch64_latest_filename

ppc64le:
https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_ppc64le_latest_filename
https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_ppc64le_latest_filename

Re: Got NVMe hardware? I need you!

2018-08-20 Thread Richard Hughes

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 20:13, Jason L Tibbitts III  wrote:
> but would you prefer that I append something to my machine ID
> so that I can send the others?

Yes please, just change the last two digits. I think it always has to
be 32 hex chars in size, but it doesn't have to be a machine ID.

> Simplified NVMe firmware updates would be great; I have several machines
> with Intel NVMe SSDs that had firmware bugs weird enough that I could
> install a machine using EXT4 but trying to install with XFS would lead
> to immediate FS corruption at boot time.

You're the second person to mention the Intel bug, I'll certainly
prioritize that, although I'm not super confident about Intel
specifically. Thanks for the data.

Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AK53T6XKQSRYCCS4CHPORV6KEW3JVFQ6/

[Bug 1618999] perl-Archive-Zip-1.62 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618999

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Archive-Zip-1.62-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a27789be83

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CFXD3OTWL4RS3HKZ3O7E74BFFUPXP5YY/

Re: I intent to orphan barman

2018-08-20 Thread Eduard Lucena

Ok, thanks for the tip.

Br,

El lun., 20 de ago. de 2018 16:20, Miro Hrončok 
escribió:

> On 20.8.2018 21:09, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can this package be a good one to start at packaging?
> >
> > If it is, I will be happy to take it.
>
> I'd recommend to start with couple of your own packages before such offers.
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W3UKJROLKO2QR2ZY47MW3PYWBPTKUSGB/

Re: I intent to orphan barman

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 20.8.2018 21:09, Eduard Lucena wrote:

Hi,

Can this package be a good one to start at packaging?

If it is, I will be happy to take it.


I'd recommend to start with couple of your own packages before such offers.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JWE76JRGKRJXN4HD6H4SX4VOSICMYRZD/

Re: ideas about logging during the initramfs

2018-08-20 Thread Dusty Mabe



On 08/17/2018 01:57 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/17/2018 01:20 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 08/17/2018 08:55 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> I'd love to make logging during early boot not require everyone
>>> to happen to get the `console=` entries ordered correctly on the
>>> kernel command line. Inevitably we always get it wrong or the ordering
>>> of the `console=` lines on a pre-baked works great for some people
>>> but not for others. What if there was a way to get those early startup
>>> systemd unit messages on all `console=` entries? Maybe there is.
>>>
>>> I've got some code that I think could help with this. We basically configure
>>> the journal in the initramfs to log all messages at 'info' level and above
>>> to kmsg. We also have to make the kernel not ratelimit messages during this
>>> time. Check out the proposed change and see what you think:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/pull/445
>>
>> Probably obvious question but can you clarify what the exact problem
>> is with logging in initramfs right now? It sounds like the issue
>> is that if something goes wrong early it doesn't get logged to
>> the journal so you want to output it to the console?
> 
> Right now journal output will go to the primary console of the machine,
> which is the last `console=` entry on the kernel command line. It's been
> like this forever. It's expected.
> 
> The problem is that often enough a user either doesn't know which device
> is the primary console or somehow doesn't have access to the output of the
> device that is associated with the primary console, thus they must play a
> guessing game. If somehow they don't have access to that device then they are
> out of luck.
> 
> I'm proposing that we log journal output to kmsg during the initramfs (after
> switch root that won't be the case because the journald.conf settings from
> the root filesystem would take effect), which will mean that output goes to
> all `console=` devices and not just the primary one.
> 
> The reason for this request is because we are starting to use ignition [1]
> a lot more and debugging troubles in the initramfs is much easier if you don't
> have to hunt for the right output device where the magical messages are. Of
> course in Fedora CoreOS we could just apply these settings just for CoreOS,
> but this is a problem I've had myself for a long time and I'd actually like
> to see it applied to all of Fedora.
> 
> Dusty
> 
> [1] https://github.com/coreos/ignition/

bumping this.. i would like some input if anyone has any, whether it be good
or bad. 

Dusty 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MFMMYGRQ6BCXD2VSV2M7A46ETLB4ODT4/

Re: Got NVMe hardware? I need you!

2018-08-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III

I will happily send info for several devices here which have NVMe, but
my regular use desktop has three NVMe devices.  I sent info for
/dev/nvme0 but would you prefer that I append something to my machine ID
so that I can send the others?  

Simplified NVMe firmware updates would be great; I have several machines
with Intel NVMe SSDs that had firmware bugs weird enough that I could
install a machine using EXT4 but trying to install with XFS would lead
to immediate FS corruption at boot time.

 - J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GGXR7SBXYZJJEV7CPO6QBY2RHC7SKXZR/

Re: I intent to orphan barman

2018-08-20 Thread Eduard Lucena

Hi,

Can this package be a good one to start at packaging?

If it is, I will be happy to take it.

Br,

El lun., 20 de ago. de 2018 15:06, Miro Hrončok 
escribió:

> I recently got https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/barman
>
> I will orphan it in a week if nobody wants it.
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HG7QVZBEOOFKVMLRBXO5CS57FFPVJZUQ/
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3YTI2F6LYY7YBCGI6DFOXO24JTTVPYBN/

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

2018-08-20 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.

Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with some
security fixes. Not sure if the API changed or anything like that as
their changelog is pretty terse.



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/E6IESTBQFUFUIEN5DVTXZAEQKQJHU7F5/

Re: intel microcode license change?

2018-08-20 Thread Chris Murphy

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Chris Murphy  wrote:
> So this made HN:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17801474
>
> I've downloaded both 20180703 and 20180807 firmware from Intel and the
> two licenses are different, in particular with the usage of the term
> 'property'.
>
> When I downloaded the 20180807 version, there was no prompt for
> license agreement, but there is a license file in the tgz. Whereas
> when downloading the 20180703 version, there is a license agreement
> prompt, but no license file in the tgz.
>
> Anyway, should this be in koji until this is resolved? The thread
> above suggests Intel is aware of the problem and will fix it, but...
> yeah.
>
> cc'ing le...@lists.fedoraproject.org in the blind (I'm not subscribed)
>
> --
> Chris Murphy

OK so this might be a nevermind because of this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906158#49

But nevertheless on cursory reading I do not like a license agreement
that starts out with "do not download this until you agree to it" and
yet I have to download the tgz in order to read the license. The
license isn't in the RPM. I also don't like this "will not allow any
third party" b.s. as if Fedora has any responsibility or power to
prevent me (or any Fedora user) to do trivial things like benchmarking
the performance effects of these microcode updates. And so on...


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CNNJ6UV7D2WNKKSBDL7QIX5IPI24FGAJ/

[Bug 1613504] Should WWW::Mechanize require 'HTML::TreeBuilder'?

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613504

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.86-2.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.86-2.f
   |c27 |c27
   ||perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.87-2.f
   ||c28



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.87-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YBQVYAUUWNPM6SWHPCNDW62S376QOYEE/

Re: Starting to use gcc-8 on upstream Python project CI

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok

On 20.8.2018 20:02, Jun Aruga wrote:

Dear Python sig.

Someone can you help to promote for the upstream Python project to use
gcc-8 on the Travis CI test?
Right now the project has 4 test cases [1] including defaut gcc
version 4.8 cases on Travis CI.

However technically it is possible to use gcc-N (4.8, 5, 6, 7, 8, and
etc) on Travis CI.
I think that using the latest version gcc-8 on the upstream project is
quite beneficial for us.
Because maybe we Fedora people are working to fix new version gcc's issues.
When the python project start to use gcc-8, it is easy to share the
situation publicly outside of Fedora, and of course they can help to
check the issues.
As I checked the Python project's .travis.yml, I had no idea about how
to add gcc-8 case. ;(

I can show you 2 cases to use the technique as an example. [2][3]

[1] Python
https://travis-ci.org/python/cpython
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.travis.yml

[2] Ruby
https://travis-ci.org/junaruga/ruby/builds/418242410
https://github.com/junaruga/ruby/blob/feature/ci-new-gcc/.travis.yml
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1937

[3] A project I am working as a hobby.
https://travis-ci.org/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq
https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/blob/master/.travis.yml

I'm taking this to python-...@python.org which is more appropriate place
to discuss this. I think Victor is involved in the CIs, is that right?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HLDVIGIJ2OK3QILEVPCBJHMB3MSB3NA6/

intel microcode license change?

2018-08-20 Thread Chris Murphy

So this made HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17801474

I've downloaded both 20180703 and 20180807 firmware from Intel and the
two licenses are different, in particular with the usage of the term
'property'.

When I downloaded the 20180807 version, there was no prompt for
license agreement, but there is a license file in the tgz. Whereas
when downloading the 20180703 version, there is a license agreement
prompt, but no license file in the tgz.

Anyway, should this be in koji until this is resolved? The thread
above suggests Intel is aware of the problem and will fix it, but...
yeah.

cc'ing le...@lists.fedoraproject.org in the blind (I'm not subscribed)

-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WQOMAJZG3RGLGAXFZCTOVXMAQ6WOQXQH/

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2018-08-20 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  71  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c   
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
  39  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d801e05f92   
uwsgi-2.0.17.1-1.el6
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f21474267b   
condor-8.6.11-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d143ebd7cc   
tomcat-7.0.90-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-785de4dd7a   
lighttpd-1.4.47-2.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

nagios-plugins-fts-3.5.0-3.el6
php-horde-horde-5.2.19-1.el6
php-horde-turba-4.2.23-1.el6
prosody-0.10.2-3.el6

Details about builds:



 nagios-plugins-fts-3.5.0-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9547d1abfc)
 Nagios probes to be run remotely against FTS3 machines

Update Information:

* fix python dependencies    * new upstream release

ChangeLog:





 php-horde-horde-5.2.19-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-53cec96c19)
 Horde Application Framework

Update Information:

**horde 5.2.19**  * [jan] Add option to kill a user session from the
administration interface. * [mjr] Fix detecting available upgrades for library
packages.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 20 2018 Remi Collet  - 5.2.19-1
- update to 5.2.19




 php-horde-turba-4.2.23-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-93fd7b36ff)
 A web based address book

Update Information:

**turba 4.2.23**  * [mjr] Remove debug output that was breaking EAS searches
(Bug: 14843).

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 20 2018 Remi Collet  - 4.2.23-1
- update to 4.2.23




 prosody-0.10.2-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1076a2fb80)
 Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP

Update Information:

- Don't attempt to reload during logrotate if prosody is stopped

ChangeLog:

* Sun Aug 19 2018 Robert Scheck  0.10.2-3
- Don't attempt to reload during logrotate if prosody is stopped
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.10.2-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VEV5JMZUQLPCXATBIG7F4I74ZKPEAOZ7/

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2018-08-20 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  71  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a   
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
  66  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-15b7dc35af   
pass-1.7.2-1.el7
  39  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d2e0971e9b   
uwsgi-2.0.17.1-1.el7
  22  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a   
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7 pandoc-citeproc-0.3.0.1-4.el7
  21  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5346e2123a   
dpkg-1.18.25-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-aec074825a   
thunderbird-enigmail-2.0.8-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0be0127779   
libgit2-0.26.6-1.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-33f460bd9c   
moodle-3.1.13-2.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dce803ff0d   
lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-69993b3f45   
sleuthkit-4.6.2-1.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6f182ddbf7   
python34-3.4.9-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

nagios-plugins-fts-3.5.0-3.el7
php-horde-horde-5.2.19-1.el7
php-horde-turba-4.2.23-1.el7
prosody-0.10.2-3.el7
standard-test-roles-2.15-1.el7

Details about builds:



 nagios-plugins-fts-3.5.0-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-47941843c1)
 Nagios probes to be run remotely against FTS3 machines

Update Information:

* fix python dependencies    * new upstream release




 php-horde-horde-5.2.19-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8b3d48f4db)
 Horde Application Framework

Update Information:

**horde 5.2.19**  * [jan] Add option to kill a user session from the
administration interface. * [mjr] Fix detecting available upgrades for library
packages.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 20 2018 Remi Collet  - 5.2.19-1
- update to 5.2.19




 php-horde-turba-4.2.23-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f7342824d0)
 A web based address book

Update Information:

**turba 4.2.23**  * [mjr] Remove debug output that was breaking EAS searches
(Bug: 14843).

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 20 2018 Remi Collet  - 4.2.23-1
- update to 4.2.23




 prosody-0.10.2-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3e8389a43f)
 Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP

Update Information:

- Don't attempt to reload during logrotate if prosody is stopped

ChangeLog:

* Sun Aug 19 2018 Robert Scheck  0.10.2-3
- Don't attempt to reload during logrotate if prosody is stopped
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.10.2-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild




 standard-test-roles-2.15-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-aa2d17851f)
 Standard Test Interface Ansible roles

Update Information:

Update to 2.15

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 20 2018 Andrei Stepanov  - 2.15-1
- Build with the latest merged PRs.
* Sat Jul 14 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 2.14-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:

Starting to use gcc-8 on upstream Python project CI

2018-08-20 Thread Jun Aruga

Dear Python sig.

Someone can you help to promote for the upstream Python project to use
gcc-8 on the Travis CI test?
Right now the project has 4 test cases [1] including defaut gcc
version 4.8 cases on Travis CI.

I can show you 2 cases to use the technique as an example. [2][3]

[1] Python
https://travis-ci.org/python/cpython
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.travis.yml

[2] Ruby
https://travis-ci.org/junaruga/ruby/builds/418242410
https://github.com/junaruga/ruby/blob/feature/ci-new-gcc/.travis.yml
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1937

[3] A project I am working as a hobby.
https://travis-ci.org/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq
https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/blob/master/.travis.yml

--
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JP23C55C7ACXFFK4WTVINR7KMVPTAJKD/

Re: Package orphaned (python-flask-wtf, python-html5lib, gnome-pie, transgui)

2018-08-20 Thread Antonio Trande

I'm willing for maintaining python-html5lib

On 20/08/2018 13:49, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am not able to maintain some of the packages and now ready to take
> by a different package maintainer.
> 
> - python-flask-wtf
> - python-html5lib
> - gnome-pie
> - transgui
> 

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/72LQCTVYTDZL5ATQIIVX2LB5AFCRLZ3K/

[Bug 1613213] Upgrade perl-Parse-EDID to 1.0.7

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613213

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Parse-EDID-1.0.7-1.fc2
   ||7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-08-20 13:58:05



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Parse-EDID-1.0.7-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HWIWLD4MPWN4ZFOG36HPG4KKMKTGYOYK/

[Bug 1613504] Should WWW::Mechanize require 'HTML::TreeBuilder'?

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613504

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.86-2.f
   ||c27
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-08-20 13:57:58



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.86-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S4GVTO7YSXIIOK4ZJJH2AIVGW7PKSCTS/

[Bug 1613218] Upgrade perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize to 1.50

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613218
Bug 1613218 depends on bug 1613504, which changed state.

Bug 1613504 Summary: Should WWW::Mechanize require 'HTML::TreeBuilder'?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613504

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/G26N2TMZDNEPIEY3UUGD4BWCFGAEXA5W/

Re: Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

2018-08-20 Thread Antonio Trande

I'm taking python-html5lib

On 20/08/2018 13:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20.8.2018 09:15, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176
>>
>> Current maintainer said:
>> Praveen Kumar  --- Apologies, I
>> caught
>> up with some other work and not able to maintain this package, I am
>> happy to
>> give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.
> 
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7694
> 

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WUIQU2X54LBZU6B4KK7GAPTB3KGHVG2A/

I intent to orphan barman

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok


I recently got https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/barman

I will orphan it in a week if nobody wants it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HG7QVZBEOOFKVMLRBXO5CS57FFPVJZUQ/

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok

On 14.8.2018 14:53, Marek Kasik wrote:

On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:

Hi,

I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.

There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.

I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have
backported/prepared fixes to reflect poppler's API changes.

Unfortunately, libreoffice does not build currently (#1615616). But I've
decided to push the rebase though because branching will happen today
and I could not do chain build after that for F29.

Btw, if your package use the unstable API (headers from poppler-devel),
could you consider to change it to use a stable API (glib, qt, C++)?

Please do not push this change today. We are going to branch F29 and I'd
really like to not see a whole lot of breakage at the same time.

It would be best to work out the kinks in Rawhide and then merge them all
at once to F29 between Branching and Beta Freeze.

Hi,

I've already pushed the change to rawhide at night. The only problems
are LibreOffice and GDAL now. They don't build from source even without
the rebase of poppler.
I'm looking at the GDAL now and I see that Caolan has pushed new
LibreOffice to rawhide.

Proposed a blocker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619295

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CZD3YNCW6CTFM66A5X4EIDEZQB4MG4KM/

Fedora Copr can now flag commits and pull requests from src.fp.o

2018-08-20 Thread Michal Novotny

Hello,

in addition to auto-rebuilding feature from Fedora DistGit (
src.fedoraproject.org), we have added possibility to flag commits and pull
requests after an auto-rebuild. This works not only with Fedora DistGit but
with any pagure instance (e.g. also
https://upstreamfirst.fedorainfracloud.org/ or just pagure.io). The setup
for your Copr project is just a few simple steps. See the documentation
here:

https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#pagure-integration

or you can just also follow instructions present in Settings->Integrations
in your Copr project. Everything needed is there as well.

Please, enjoy
Copr team
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RXJ43NPVLOG33XZUT3QMVBR5PZN6HQQ5/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RXJ43NPVLOG33XZUT3QMVBR5PZN6HQQ5/

Fedora Copr can now flag commits and pull requests from src.fp.o

2018-08-20 Thread Michal Novotny

Hello,

in addition to auto-rebuilding feature from Fedora DistGit (
src.fedoraproject.org), we have added possibility to flag commits and pull
requests after an auto-rebuild. This works not only with Fedora DistGit but
with any pagure instance (e.g. also
https://upstreamfirst.fedorainfracloud.org/ or just pagure.io). The setup
for your Copr project is just a few simple steps. See the documentation
here:

https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#pagure-integration

or you can just also follow instructions present in Settings->Integrations
in your Copr project. Everything needed is there as well.

Please, enjoy
Copr team
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RXJ43NPVLOG33XZUT3QMVBR5PZN6HQQ5/

Re: Provenpackager help request: ignored pull requests

2018-08-20 Thread Scott Talbert


On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:

I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of wx 
2.8 which is not maintained since 2011.  I have made a bunch of pull 
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no 
response to the bugs I filed).  Rather than go through the non-responsive 
maintainer process for all of these, is there a provenpackager who would be 
willing to just merge these and possibly initiate builds?


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nightview/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/megaglest/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libreatlas/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/DivFix++/pull-request/1


Do you need this in f29?


I had a soft goal of trying to get this done before f29 branch point, but 
I've still got many packages to go, so no, no it's not really needed 
there.


Thanks for merging those PRs :)

Scott___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HM4V3BQXEGCACAC5WPRQG3G5VKQP64EE/

Re: Provenpackager help request: ignored pull requests

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 16.8.2018 01:45, Scott Talbert wrote:

Hi,

I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of 
wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011.  I have made a bunch of pull 
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and 
no response to the bugs I filed).  Rather than go through the 
non-responsive maintainer process for all of these, is there a 
provenpackager who would be willing to just merge these and possibly 
initiate builds?


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nightview/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/megaglest/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libreatlas/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/DivFix++/pull-request/1


Do you need this in f29?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LLBBO42YIVRGALZRHJ7DFUT3VACVS53P/

Re: Package orphaned (python-flask-wtf, python-html5lib, gnome-pie, transgui)

2018-08-20 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 05:19:29PM +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am not able to maintain some of the packages and now ready to take
> by a different package maintainer.
> 
> - python-flask-wtf

I'm taking this one :)


Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XDZFKKMUTIXJXCPXQUCMXS2ETNN35EQR/

Re: Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 20.8.2018 09:15, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176

Current maintainer said:
Praveen Kumar  --- Apologies, I caught
up with some other work and not able to maintain this package, I am happy to
give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.


https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7694

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OQMU3HVRMN6CUTHT4PZVL2L37X3EH7ZD/

Re: Package orphaned (python-flask-wtf, python-html5lib, gnome-pie, transgui)

2018-08-20 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 20.8.2018 13:49, Praveen Kumar wrote:

Hi,

I am not able to maintain some of the packages and now ready to take
by a different package maintainer.

- python-flask-wtf
- python-html5lib


I'll take it. I've opened a releng ticket. 
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7694



- gnome-pie
- transgui



--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZYXAMXYFE7RWXVY5ASYN2HYINBUKJYW2/

Package orphaned (python-flask-wtf, python-html5lib, gnome-pie, transgui)

2018-08-20 Thread Praveen Kumar

Hi,

I am not able to maintain some of the packages and now ready to take
by a different package maintainer.

- python-flask-wtf
- python-html5lib
- gnome-pie
- transgui

-- 
Praveen Kumar
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kumarpraveen
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B6HMCSOBOKTHAVCHCYI4TZ2PTNRR2RML/

[Bug 1618999] perl-Archive-Zip-1.62 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618999



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Archive-Zip-1.62-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a27789be83

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P5PA4XAKE6M2VDMDTLPDZJQK6KTLDSDR/

[Bug 1618999] perl-Archive-Zip-1.62 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618999

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Archive-Zip-1.62-1.fc3
   ||0
   ||perl-Archive-Zip-1.62-1.fc2
   ||9



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GYJUHOVCNQEILCXYXWYWUAFAAAQYPDW5/

[Bug 1596132] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip [fedora-all]

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Version|28  |27
   Fixed In Version|perl-Archive-Zip-1.60-4.fc2 |perl-Archive-Zip-1.59-6.fc2
   |9   |7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-08-20 06:00:46



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/D5W6L5TEZ6CSIQH4UHZ4ELY2PN4Z2XTO/

[Bug 1591449] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449
Bug 1591449 depends on bug 1596132, which changed state.

Bug 1596132 Summary: CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in 
Archive::Zip [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VH7N4K5CI4HP6ZP5BYQTFHXAFD5WS2MR/

Re: [atomic-devel] [CoreOS] Re: Re: Starting a Container SIG

2018-08-20 Thread Clement Verna

Dear all,

I have scheduled our first IRC meeting for this week Thursday (August
23, 2018 - 15:00 UTC)  on #fedora-containers (freenode) [0]. The
agenda for this meeting is :
  - everyone interested in the SIG to introduce themselves
  - Go through some of the discussion we had during flock.
  - Finally try to find a fortnightly meeting time that suits everyone.

Hope to see you there Thursday,

Clément


[0] - https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9320/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UNW6ZSL6JBHGX547SYPXBWY3USO7WPFF/

Re: Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

2018-08-20 Thread Igor Gnatenko

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:11 AM Joseph D. Wagner 
wrote:

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176
>
> Current maintainer said:
> Praveen Kumar  --- Apologies, I
> caught
> up with some other work and not able to maintain this package, I am happy
> to
> give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.
>

Feel free to assign it to me.
-- 

-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OXJQIKHXKBMOAB3A3XZYY4IA5NM7MDAL/

Re: Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

2018-08-20 Thread Antonio Trande

I can maintain it, but this package is not orphaned yet.
Other than Praveen Kumar, there are three packagers with 'admin'
permissions: pjp, salimma, sundaram.

On 20/08/2018 09:15, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176
> 
> Current maintainer said:
> Praveen Kumar  --- Apologies, I caught
> up with some other work and not able to maintain this package, I am happy to
> give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IDGXPLBU4RES34AG4XX4MON32IAXOPDK/
> 

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VI2A6IE6RSB57DP2NWIXR7VIMXI4ZO2S/

Re: Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

2018-08-20 Thread Manas Mangaonkar

Id be happy to maintain it, recently began packaging and looking for more
experience.

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, 13:33 Joseph D. Wagner,  wrote:

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176
>
> Current maintainer said:
> Praveen Kumar  --- Apologies, I
> caught
> up with some other work and not able to maintain this package, I am happy
> to
> give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IDGXPLBU4RES34AG4XX4MON32IAXOPDK/
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KO6ZYGNJO4D4DJWAOBLYNUXUKB733CZR/

[389-devel] Updating our CoC

2018-08-20 Thread William Brown

Hey everyone,

I was talking to mkosek earlier, and he informed me that the FreeIPA
project have adopted a Coc - which is great!

I remember that last year we implemented the fedora coc in our project.
I think that given our close alignment with the FreeIPA project and
their operations, perhaps we should share some work and use their's.

The IPA CoC can be found:

https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

I wonder if we can discuss with them about sharing the same reporting
email infrastructure. 

What do we think?

-- 
Sincerely,

William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KIG2NA7SGOU3GADZ5TDDJRFLMRMIUFZK/

[Bug 1618999] perl-Archive-Zip-1.62 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618999

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Archive-Zip-1.61 is|perl-Archive-Zip-1.62 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.62
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.60-5.fc29
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Archive-Zip/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2650/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NGCM6B6RNPB5BAN46P2VIPM3EPQYOP4H/

[Bug 1618997] perl-CGI-4.40 is available

2018-08-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618997

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-4.40-1.fc30
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-08-20 04:39:54



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HRSK6NDFRTSNUHEZY3NHGNYEIYZY6U7E/

Got NVMe hardware? I need you!

2018-08-20 Thread Richard Hughes

Hi all,

I've started to look at adding firmware updates for NVMe hardware to
the LVFS project (realistically for Fedora >= 31, so don't get too
excited). Before I know which vendors to approach, and what I need to
ask for, I need to get some statistics about the NVMe hardware the
"typical linux user" is using. I've expanded a lot on the
https://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2018/08/17/nvme-firmware-i-need-your-data/
blog entry I wrote a few days ago if you'd like some more explanation
and justification.

So, what do I would like you to do. You don’t need to reboot, unmount
any filesystems or anything like that. Just:

Install nvme (e.g. dnf install nvme-cli) then do sudo nvme id-ctrl
--raw-binary /dev/nvme0 > /tmp/id-ctrl

If that worked, run the following command:

curl -F type=nvme \
-F "machine_id="`cat /etc/machine-id` \
-F file=@/tmp/id-ctrl \
https://staging.fwupd.org/lvfs/upload_hwinfo

The first command isn’t doing anything with the firmware; it’s just
asking the NVMe drive to report what it knows about itself. It should
be 100% safe, the kernel already did the same request at system
startup.

We are using your random machine ID to ensure we don’t record
duplicate submissions -- if that makes you unhappy for some reason
just choose some other random 32 byte hex string. In the binary file
created by nvme there is the encoded model number and serial number of
your drive; if this makes you uneasy please don’t send the file.

Many thanks,

Richard.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XANJNG363Y7XPHZMDVMRPTNR3R52IWCS/

Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

2018-08-20 Thread Joseph D. Wagner

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176

Current maintainer said:
Praveen Kumar  --- Apologies, I caught
up with some other work and not able to maintain this package, I am happy to
give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IDGXPLBU4RES34AG4XX4MON32IAXOPDK/

62 matches

Mail list logo