[Bug 1808744] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200229 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808744

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Thoughts on swapping to rfc2307bis.ldif by default

[William Brown]

Hi all,

As you may know, I'm currently working on a migration utility to help move from 
other ldap servers to 389-ds. Something that I have noticed in this process is 
that other servers default to rfc2307bis.ldif [0] by default. As part of the 
migration I would like to handle this situation a bit better. It's likely not 
viable for me to simply plaster rfc2307bis into 99user.ldif as part of the 
migration process, so I want to approach this better. 

rfc2307 and rfc2307bis are incompatible schemas that redefine the same OIDs 
with new/different meanings. Some key examples:

* posixGroup in rfc2307 only requires gidNumber, rfc2307bis requires cn and 
gidNumber.
* ipServiceProtocol, ipHostNumber, ipNetworkNumber and nisMapName change from 
"sup name" to "syntax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15". sup name is also syntax 
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 so this channge is minimal.
* posixGroup and posixAccount change from structural to auxillary in rfc2307bis 
(allowing them to be combined with person or nsAccount).

Objectively, rfc2307bis is the better schema - but as with all proposals like 
this, there is always a risk of breaking customers or compatibility.

I'm wondering what would be a reasonable course of action for us to move to 
rfc2307bis by default. My current thoughts:

* have rfc2307bis vs rfc2307 as an option to dssetup so we use the correct 
schema in the setup.
* default the setup option to rfc2307bis
* Tests for handling both setup options
* Upgrades of the server should not affect the rfc2307 vs rfc2307bis status
* A dsctl tool to allow changing between the rfc2307/rfc2307bis.

Thoughts? Concern? Ideas? Comments? 


[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02 

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808956] New: perl-Encode-3.03 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808956

Bug ID: 1808956
   Summary: perl-Encode-3.03 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Encode
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 3.03
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.02-441.fc32
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Encode/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2849/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-03-02 - 95% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/03/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.3-20200302git245d894.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fwd: How to update ? Was:[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I got the following mail:

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 02:11:13 GMT
From:   bugzi...@redhat.com
To: muft...@web.de



The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user
has been
waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take
action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of
these bugs
might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.)

We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding,
or if
there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3
days for your response.

needinfo


Bug 1800246: wdune: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32 (15 days old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800246
To see all your outstanding requests, visit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue=mufti11%40web.de=type
 End Forwarded Message 

According to

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41322749

this is version 1.654

buildArch (wdune-1.654-4.fc32.src.rpm, armv7hl)


but i updated to version 1.789

with something like

...
$ fedpkg import wdune-1.789-sourcrerpm
...
$ fedpkg ---release f32
$ fedpkg build

This showed no error.

What is wrong ?

so long
MUFTI




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaned objectweb-asm3

[Miro Hrončok]

I've just orphaned objectweb-asm3. I was the main admin, but the package was 
maintained via the Stewardship SIG that no longer needs it.


$ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires objectweb-asm3
apache-commons-jci-0:1.1-10.fc32.src
eclipse-ecf-runtime-0:3.14.6-4.fc32.noarch
eclipse-pde-1:4.14-5.fc32.x86_64
objectweb-asm3-0:3.3.1-23.fc32.src

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with my packages

[chedi toueiti]

Hi,

I'm interested in the following packages (either primary or co maintainer)

python-optcomplete
python-pkgconfig
python-pyface
python-pytest-cache
python-pytest-cov
python-pytest-flakes
python-scp

fas: chedi

On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 11:07 PM Ian McInerney 
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 9:31 PM Orion Poplawski  wrote:
>
>> I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If
>> you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or
>> becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know.  The full list
>> follows.  Many of these I just made the scitech_sig group co-mainter of
>> as described here:
>>
>>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scit...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/76IZTKYWTLQL35FJAWEWBNUIGRAQJQX7/
>>
>> so if you are interested in those becoming a member of the scitech_sig,
>> if you are not already, would probably be the easiest.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> libreoffice-TexMaths
>
>
> I can take this one (either as a co-maintainer or as the primary
> maintainer, it is up to you). My fas is imcinerney.
>
> -Ian
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
*Chedi Toueiti*

* Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be
responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff.

** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

*** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me
and brings me back.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with my packages

[Ian McInerney]

On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 9:31 PM Orion Poplawski  wrote:

> I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If
> you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or
> becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know.  The full list
> follows.  Many of these I just made the scitech_sig group co-mainter of
> as described here:
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scit...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/76IZTKYWTLQL35FJAWEWBNUIGRAQJQX7/
>
> so if you are interested in those becoming a member of the scitech_sig,
> if you are not already, would probably be the easiest.
>
> Thanks!
>
> libreoffice-TexMaths


I can take this one (either as a co-maintainer or as the primary
maintainer, it is up to you). My fas is imcinerney.

-Ian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning glade3

[Miro Hrončok]

I've taken glade3 when it was orphaned and Xfce needed it via libxfce4ui.

Since then, it no longer needs it, so I've orphaned it again.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with my packages

[Neal Gompa]

On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:31 PM Orion Poplawski  wrote:
>
> I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If
> you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or
> becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know.  The full list
> follows.  Many of these I just made the scitech_sig group co-mainter of
> as described here:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scit...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/76IZTKYWTLQL35FJAWEWBNUIGRAQJQX7/
>
> so if you are interested in those becoming a member of the scitech_sig,
> if you are not already, would probably be the easiest.
>

[...]

> cobbler

I'd be happy to co-maintain this with you, and once I mentor Jochen a
bit on Fedora package maintenance, he can join in this. :)


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with my packages

[Miro Hrončok]

On 01. 03. 20 22:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If you 
would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or becoming the 
primary maintainer, please let me know.  The full list follows >

python-pycodestyle


And this is needed by mu. I can take it as well.

While you are at it, feel free to add python-sig group to all of your Python 
packages.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with my packages

[Miro Hrončok]

On 01. 03. 20 22:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If you 
would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or becoming the 
primary maintainer, please let me know.  The full list follows.


python-terminado
python-traitlets


Those two are needed by Jupyter notebook. Feel free to add me.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with my packages

[Miro Hrončok]

On 01. 03. 20 22:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If you 
would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or becoming the 
primary maintainer, please let me know.


python-setuptools_scm


I should take this one, a crucial part of the Python stack depends on this.
Feel free to add me as admin or make me the main admin.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Need help with my packages

[Orion Poplawski]

I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help.  If 
you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or 
becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know.  The full list 
follows.  Many of these I just made the scitech_sig group co-mainter of 
as described here:


https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scit...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/76IZTKYWTLQL35FJAWEWBNUIGRAQJQX7/

so if you are interested in those becoming a member of the scitech_sig, 
if you are not already, would probably be the easiest.


Thanks!

ast
BareBonesBrowserLaunch
bes
cmake
cobbler
codehaus-parent
cube
cups-x2go
dcw-gmt
eclipse-photran
eclipse-ptp
elfio
fail2ban
fcode-utils
ftnchek
g2clib
gdl
gifsicle
GMT
gshhg-gmt-nc4
guessencoding
gv
hdf
hdf5
java-sleep
javatar
jilter
koan
kwalletcli
lasi
libdap
libfabric
libreoffice-TexMaths
Lmod
lua-term
Mayavi
moconti
mod_xsendfile
MySQL-zrm
ncl
nco
ncview
netcdf
netcdf4-python
netcdf-cxx
netcdf-cxx4
netcdf-fortran
netcdf-perl
nx-libs
oct2spec
octave
octave-image
octave-io
octave-ncarray
octave-netcdf
octave-statistics
opari2
openblas-srpm-macros
openvpn-auth-ldap
otf2
pam_2fa
paraview
pcfi
perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO
perl-Boulder
perl-Cflow
perl-Device-SerialPort
perl-ExtUtils-F77
perl-HTML-Table
perl-Log-Trivial
perl-Net-IP-CMatch
perl-Net-Patricia
perl-String-Approx
perl-XML-DOM
perl-XML-RegExp
plplot
pslib
pyhoca-cli
pyhoca-gui
python-AppTools
python-cftime
python-clyent
python-conda-package-handling
python-cytoolz
python-ecdsa
python-enthought-sphinx-theme
python-envisage
python-fido2
python-ipython_genutils
python-locket
python-nbformat
python-numpydoc
python-optcomplete
python-pamela
python-pkgconfig
python-process-tests
python-pycodestyle
python-pycosat
python-pyface
python-pytest-cache
python-pytest-cov
python-pytest-flakes
python-scp
python-setuptools_scm
python-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker
python-sphinx-gallery
python-spur
python-terminado
python-toolz
python-traitlets
python-Traits
python-traitsui
python-vsc-install
python-x2go
python-xmlrunner
qtbrowserplugin
rhash
scorep
svgalib
tcl-signal
vtk
wgrib
wgrib2
x2goclient
x2godesktopsharing
x2goserver
zfp

--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Generate list of my packages

[Orion Poplawski]

On 2/28/20 1:21 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote:

Something like this should work:

$ curl -o result.json
'https://src.fedoraproject.org/api/0/projects?owner=orion_page=100'
$ jq 

Thanks!  That got me started down the right path...


Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 21:05 Uhr schrieb Scott Talbert :


On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Orion Poplawski wrote:


Can someone point me to a way to generate a list of non-retired packages that
I am a maintainer on?  Thanks.

Hunting around for a "pagure cli" doesn't bring up much that seems active.


You could probably scrape it from here?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/dashboard/projects



- Thomas
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org




--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808887] New: perl-PDL-2.021 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808887

Bug ID: 1808887
   Summary: perl-PDL-2.021 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-PDL
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com,
jakub.jedel...@gmail.com, john.j5l...@gmail.com,
jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, lkund...@v3.sk,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com,
sandm...@redhat.com, tjczep...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 2.021
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.20.0-2.fc32
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-32-20200301.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 26/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200229.n.0):

ID: 530024  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530024
ID: 530027  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530027
ID: 530063  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530063
ID: 530069  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530069
ID: 530076  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530076
ID: 530079  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530079
ID: 530124  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530124

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200229.n.0):

ID: 530043  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530043
ID: 530045  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530045
ID: 530093  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530093
ID: 530100  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530100
ID: 530109  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530109
ID: 530123  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530123
ID: 530126  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530126
ID: 530128  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530128
ID: 530129  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530129
ID: 530138  Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530138
ID: 530139  Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530139
ID: 530146  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530146
ID: 530151  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530151
ID: 530154  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530154
ID: 530167  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530167
ID: 530179  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530179
ID: 530186  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530186
ID: 530187  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530187
ID: 530192  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530192
ID: 530193  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530193

Soft failed openQA tests: 13/171 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-32-20200229.n.0):

ID: 530081  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530081

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-32-20200229.n.0):

ID: 530021  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530021
ID: 530022  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530022
ID: 530026  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530026
ID: 530029  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530029
ID: 530030  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530030
ID: 530050  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530050
ID: 530113  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530113
ID: 530122  Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530122
ID: 530140  Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530140
ID: 530175  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/530175
ID: 530178  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: 

[Test-Announce] 2020-03-02 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# F32 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2020-03-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker, 5 proposed Beta freeze
exceptions, and 1 proposed Final blocker to review, so let's have a
Fedora 32 blocker review meeting tomorrow!

If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F32 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good day and see you tomorrow!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2020-03-02 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-03-02
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

It's a busy time right now! Let's check in again on where we are
with Fedora 32 and current proposals and changes. This is the same
agenda as two weeks ago, but it still applies!

If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and suggest them! Thanks.

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. F32 status
3. Proposals, IoT, CoreOS...
4. Test Day / community event status
5. Open floor
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Adding Medical SIG package group and including bio-tech, biology

[Jun Aruga]

> ## Creating RPM group: medical-sig
>
> I would like to add "medical-sig" to the RPM groups that is listed on
> the page below.
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups
> Someone do you know how to create the group?

I want both "medical-sig" and "biology" group.

"medical-sig" group is to manage and list all packages managed at
medical sig with FAS group "medical-packagers-sig".
It's like "go-sig".
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups/go-sig

"biology" group is just to manage and list the sub category biology of
the medical packages.
It's like "ruby-rails". I do not need the FAS group.
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups/ruby-rails

It might be used as the group install.
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/ruby/ror-installation.html
> $ sudo dnf group install 'Ruby on Rails'

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Help with gcc10-arm-only problem

[Tom Hughes via devel]

On 01/03/2020 16:44, Sergio Pascual wrote:


The package build in all arches except in arm an the error is:

/builddir/build/BUILD/libindi-1.8.1/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp: In 
member function 'bool INDI::Telescope::processTimeInfo(const char*, 
const char*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/libindi-1.8.1/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp:1647:17: 
error: 'stime' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'ctime'?

  1647 |                 stime(_time);
       |                 ^
       |                 ctime
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/indidriverstatic.dir/build.make:352: 
CMakeFiles/indidriverstatic.dir/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp.o] Error 1


For some reason, stime works in all arches except in arm. Any hint?


I'm not sure why as stime as been deprecated in glibc so shouldn't
be available to use on any architecture.

The code needs to be updated to use clock_settime instead.

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Help with gcc10-arm-only problem

[Sergio Pascual]

Hi list, I'm trying to fix this problem

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799588

It built in previous releases, so I assume is gcc 10 related

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41318599

The package build in all arches except in arm an the error is:

/builddir/build/BUILD/libindi-1.8.1/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp: In
member function 'bool INDI::Telescope::processTimeInfo(const char*, const
char*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/libindi-1.8.1/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp:1647:17:
error: 'stime' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'ctime'?
 1647 | stime(_time);
  | ^
  | ctime
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/indidriverstatic.dir/build.make:352:
CMakeFiles/indidriverstatic.dir/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp.o] Error 1

For some reason, stime works in all arches except in arm. Any hint?

Thank you, Sergio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200301.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-32-20200229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200301.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Unretiring procedure for python-cclib

[Antonio Trande]

Hi all.

I wish to claim the python-cclib package's mantainership.
New review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571

Best regards
-- 
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Adding Medical SIG package group and including bio-tech, biology

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,

There are 3 topics for the Fedora Medical SIG in this email.

## Creating RPM group: medical-sig

I would like to add "medical-sig" to the RPM groups that is listed on
the page below.
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups
Someone do you know how to create the group?


## Including bio-tech to Medical SIG

Seeing the SIG's wiki page, right now Medical SIG is for
Doctor/Dentist's healthcare system specific.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/FedoraMedical

I want to update the Medical SIG's wiki page including bio-tech,
biology content.
In my opinion, a challenge for the medical, biology communities is the
sustainability.
Each medical and bio package maintainer in Fedora tends to manage
their RPM packages in individual level.
I want to make the Medical SIG the inclusive place the place to
communicate and work collaboratively for the RPM packages.

A good role model for the concept of Medical SIG is Debian Med team.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed
> The Debian Med project prepares packages that are associated with medicine, 
> pre-clinical research, and life sciences. Its developments are mostly focused 
> on three areas for the moment: medical practice, imaging and bioinformatics.

I want to adapt the concept to Fedora Medical SIG.

https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/
Biology is the sub category of the Medical in the Debian Med project.

Well, for example working for creating a yogurt that has a strength
for the disease sequencing the yogurt bacteria genome is not medical.
But aligning with Debian Medical project is still meaningful for me.

Any thoughts?


## Promotion!

If you are interested in Medical/Biology, please join us to Medical SIG!
It's a very moderate traffic group right now.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/medical-...@lists.fedorahosted.org/
=> Manage subscription

Mailing list address: medical-...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Cheers,
Jun

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808816] New: perl-String-Print-0.94 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808816

Bug ID: 1808816
   Summary: perl-String-Print-0.94 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-String-Print
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.94
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.93-8.fc32
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/String-Print/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3343/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Ideas and proposal for removing changelog and release fields from spec file

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Le samedi 29 février 2020 à 20:57 +0100, clime a écrit :
> > If I, as a user, see e.g. python3-alembic-1.1.0-13 in f31 and then I
> > will see python3-alembic-1.1.0-13 in f32 (this time with .fc32
> > disttag), I am going to assume nothing has changed for that package. 
> 
> And you’ll be wrong, because we do branch.

Succinct, but true.

To give a concrete example: foo-99-1 is in current rawhide and F32
branches. In rawhide, the mass rebuild happens, but so we get foo-99-2.
But this is a noarch package and foo-99-1.fc32 and foo-99-2.fc33 are
effectively identical, despite having different NVr
(where "r" is just the number part without the dist tag).
Now a bug reported that only affects F32 or the maintainer rebuilds in
F32 only. A rebuild with the fix is labelled foo-99-2.fc32. Now the
packages are functionally different, despite having same NVr.

(And this is all correct packaging, according to update guidelines.
The upgrade path is preserved at all times, and that is the only thing
that is required.)

So yeah, I stand by my original statement that 
> The numbers  in different branches cannot
> be meaningfully compared. Those numbers only make sense in the context
> of a specific branch, so they should be ordered after .

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808799] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.014 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808799

Bug ID: 1808799
   Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.014 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Dist-Zilla
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
psab...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 6.014
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.012-7.fc32
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dist-Zilla/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5898/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200301.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org