[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-04cc5bcb08 nagios-4.4.6-4.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-780cd884ad cabextract-1.9-7.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-32d4f4a583 python3-pillow-6.2.2-2.el7 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d7ae32a6da upx-3.96-8.el7 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7b1c8f21d9 chromium-89.0.4389.82-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f38c5da36 lib3mf-2.0.1-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing freight-0.3.13-1.el7 Details about builds: freight-0.3.13-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7d3f4b0e44) A modern take on the Debian archive Update Information: Latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Mon Mar 15 2021 Sam P - 0.3.13-1 - Updated to latest upstream release. * Thu May 21 2020 Sam P - 0.3.12-1 - Updated to latest upstream release ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 18:53, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34. > > I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: > > gdal > gdl > grass > libgeotiff > librasterlite2 > libspatialite > mapnik > mapserver > merkaartor > ncl > osm2pgsql > pcl > postgis > pyproj > python-cartopy Unfortunately, due to its removing the old header, Cartopy does not support Proj 8, even in the development branch. It is unlikely to be done before F34 (though I see from later emails you won't be updating there), but I will try to push to get it done for F35 upstream. > qgis > qmapshack > R-rgdal > saga > spatialite-gui > vtk > > -- > > Sandro -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934690] perl-URI-5.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-URI-5.09-1.fc35|perl-URI-5.09-1.fc35 ||perl-URI-5.09-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:01:16 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f8d4087924 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941071] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941071 Bug ID: 1941071 Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.12 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.11-2.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Natural/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7086/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials-5.7.0
Sorry, I missed the mail. I have rebuild bout++ now On 3/19/21 12:21 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > This update is still pending. > > On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: >> Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies: >> f35-build-side-37890 >> >> On 22/02/21 19:13, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. >>> Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? From the release notes it seems to only mention GPU related changes, thus I doubt any changes affecting fedora ... >>> >>> Release notes: >>> https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >>> >> >> >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >> > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938614] perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938614 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.07-1 |perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.07-1 |.fc35 |.fc35 ||perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.07-1 ||.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:17:01 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-82f71473cc has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938401] ack-3.5.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ack-3.5.0-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:14:43 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f4bf099bb4 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14-1.f |perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14-1.f |c35 |c35 ||perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14-1.f ||c34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:14:00 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28-1 |perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28-1 |.fc35 |.fc35 ||perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28-1 ||.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:13:28 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-677512a77b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1926925] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926925 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettex |perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettex |t-1.32-1.fc35 |t-1.32-1.fc35 ||perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettex ||t-1.32-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:11:37 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e4716d8f9a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1929205] perl-Business-ISMN-1.202 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISMN-1.202-1. |perl-Business-ISMN-1.202-1. |fc35|fc35 ||perl-Business-ISMN-1.202-1. ||fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:11:32 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-58e1fe89ca has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936221] perl-libwww-perl-6.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936221 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-411281d4f8 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6d722c0083 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-95cae9f155 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936048] perl-HTTP-Message-6.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936048 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Message-6.29-1.fc |perl-HTTP-Message-6.29-1.fc |35 |35 ||perl-HTTP-Message-6.29-1.fc ||34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:09:00 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9464b5ee10 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1935378] perl-PDF-API2-2.039 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-PDF-API2-2.039-1.fc35 |perl-PDF-API2-2.039-1.fc35 ||perl-PDF-API2-2.039-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:08:44 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-70c4f053b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1935417] perl-HTML-Parser-3.76 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935417 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-Parser-3.76-1.fc3 |perl-HTML-Parser-3.76-1.fc3 |5 |5 ||perl-HTML-Parser-3.76-1.fc3 ||4 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:05:54 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c620c81807 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933868] perl-Date-Manip-6.85 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ccb745c82e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933502] perl-URI-5.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933502 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-URI-5.08-1.fc35|perl-URI-5.08-1.fc35 ||perl-URI-5.09-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:01:13 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f8d4087924 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934759] perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934759 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1. |perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1. |16-1.fc35 |16-1.fc35 ||perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1. ||16-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 20:02:46 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6f313eb3fb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933477] perl-IO-Compress-2.102 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933477 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-faed82bb3c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1914227] perl-MooseX-App: FTBFS with Moose 2.2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914227 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2a909b87d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932390] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5a096a1b32 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932000] perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932000 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1c0d2f1002 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1890595] EPEL8 Request: perl-OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f2a00d88c2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f2a00d88c2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-473e880567 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-473e880567` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-473e880567 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
F35 Change proposal: Reduce dependencies on python3-setuptools (System-Wide Change)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reduce_dependencies_on_python3-setuptools == Summary == We'll do two things to reduce the number of Python packages unnecessarily Requiring python3-setuptools: # python3-devel will no longer Require python3-setuptools # packages with console_scripts/gui_scripts entry points will no longer automatically Require python3-setuptools == Owner == * Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]] * Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]] * Email: python-ma...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == Historically, for over a decade, [https://pypi.org/project/setuptools/ setuptools] was omnipresent in Python packaging. For that reason, the python3-devel package required python3-setuptools. This is however changing, with [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0517/ PEP517]- and [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0518/ PEP518]-based upstream packaging, setuptools changed to a very popular yet only optional way of building packages, many upstreams switched to poetry or flit instead. Since we received multiple user reports about an unnecessary dependency, we wanted to [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ARFZB56ULRQNT3FEAC4YXXZDIUHG4M5P/ get rid of the dependency], but it was not possible until now. We'll do the two following changes (neither one depends on the other): === python3-devel will stop Requiring python3-setuptools === When we wanted to remove the dependency before, we have encountered a problem, which is best summarized in the Python spec file: # This is not "API" (packages that need setuptools should still BuildRequire it) # However some packages apparently can build both with and without setuptools # producing egg-info as file or directory (depending on setuptools presence). # Directory-to-file updates are problematic in RPM, so we ensure setuptools is # installed when -devel is required. # See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623914 # See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Directory_Replacement Requires: (python3-setuptools if rpm-build) To avoid this problem, python3-devel currently requires `(python3-setuptools if rpmbuild)` for backwards compatibility. Other than that, python3-setuptools was always brought into the buildroot transitively with python3-rpm-generators. Since the [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/57QTZGF7FJPE2QQSGPJ3RGI4G5SLN6BM/ generators no longer use setuptools but packaging] we can finally remove the dependency. Packages that don't BuildRequire python3-setuptools but use setuptools during the build will fall into one of the following three categories: * They will fail to build from source with errors like: `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'`. * They will successfully build from source because they will fallback to the standard library distutils module - their `.egg-info` directory will become a text file instead, causing errors when RPM tries to update the package (and they will possibly miss some runtime dependencies because the metadata generated by distutils is not complete). * They will continue to build unchanged because one or more packages they BuildRequire pulls in python3-setuptools transitively - at any point in the future, this can change and either (1) or (2) will happen. We tested this change in the past when we [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GCPGM34ZGEOVUHSBGZTRYR5XKHTIJ3T7/ asked] other maintainers to explicitly BuildRequire python3-setuptools. Some of them responded, but many did not. Our analysis was based on grepping sources for any mention of setuptools, such as `import setuptools` or `from setuptools import `. Nowadays, the same grep-based query showed us roughly the same number (~350) of packages relying on python3-setuptools without BuildRequiring it. To see the direct impact, we have also briefly removed the Requires from python3-devel package used in testing [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/packages/ python3.10] in COPR. It revealed only 140 packages that fail to build from the source because of the change, however many packages bring in python3-setuptools transitively. Some of the packages might build successfully even without python3-setuptools, because they fallback to distutils (from the Python standard library) if dependency on setuptools is not satisfied. To avoid such problems we will: * Mass update packages we analyzed as impacted to add the missing BuildRequires on python3-setuptools. * Do the change while doing the [[Changes/Python3.10|update from Python 3.9 to Python 3.10]] so the path of the `.egg-info` changes from `/usr/lib(64)/python3.9/site-packages/...egg-info` to `/usr/lib(64)/python3.10/site-packages/...egg-info`, hence no longer causing troubles on upgrades if some packages actually do change it from directory to file (and changing it the other way around in the future is
F35 Change proposal: Reduce dependencies on python3-setuptools (System-Wide Change)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reduce_dependencies_on_python3-setuptools == Summary == We'll do two things to reduce the number of Python packages unnecessarily Requiring python3-setuptools: # python3-devel will no longer Require python3-setuptools # packages with console_scripts/gui_scripts entry points will no longer automatically Require python3-setuptools == Owner == * Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]] * Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]] * Email: python-ma...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == Historically, for over a decade, [https://pypi.org/project/setuptools/ setuptools] was omnipresent in Python packaging. For that reason, the python3-devel package required python3-setuptools. This is however changing, with [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0517/ PEP517]- and [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0518/ PEP518]-based upstream packaging, setuptools changed to a very popular yet only optional way of building packages, many upstreams switched to poetry or flit instead. Since we received multiple user reports about an unnecessary dependency, we wanted to [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ARFZB56ULRQNT3FEAC4YXXZDIUHG4M5P/ get rid of the dependency], but it was not possible until now. We'll do the two following changes (neither one depends on the other): === python3-devel will stop Requiring python3-setuptools === When we wanted to remove the dependency before, we have encountered a problem, which is best summarized in the Python spec file: # This is not "API" (packages that need setuptools should still BuildRequire it) # However some packages apparently can build both with and without setuptools # producing egg-info as file or directory (depending on setuptools presence). # Directory-to-file updates are problematic in RPM, so we ensure setuptools is # installed when -devel is required. # See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623914 # See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Directory_Replacement Requires: (python3-setuptools if rpm-build) To avoid this problem, python3-devel currently requires `(python3-setuptools if rpmbuild)` for backwards compatibility. Other than that, python3-setuptools was always brought into the buildroot transitively with python3-rpm-generators. Since the [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/57QTZGF7FJPE2QQSGPJ3RGI4G5SLN6BM/ generators no longer use setuptools but packaging] we can finally remove the dependency. Packages that don't BuildRequire python3-setuptools but use setuptools during the build will fall into one of the following three categories: * They will fail to build from source with errors like: `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'`. * They will successfully build from source because they will fallback to the standard library distutils module - their `.egg-info` directory will become a text file instead, causing errors when RPM tries to update the package (and they will possibly miss some runtime dependencies because the metadata generated by distutils is not complete). * They will continue to build unchanged because one or more packages they BuildRequire pulls in python3-setuptools transitively - at any point in the future, this can change and either (1) or (2) will happen. We tested this change in the past when we [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GCPGM34ZGEOVUHSBGZTRYR5XKHTIJ3T7/ asked] other maintainers to explicitly BuildRequire python3-setuptools. Some of them responded, but many did not. Our analysis was based on grepping sources for any mention of setuptools, such as `import setuptools` or `from setuptools import `. Nowadays, the same grep-based query showed us roughly the same number (~350) of packages relying on python3-setuptools without BuildRequiring it. To see the direct impact, we have also briefly removed the Requires from python3-devel package used in testing [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/packages/ python3.10] in COPR. It revealed only 140 packages that fail to build from the source because of the change, however many packages bring in python3-setuptools transitively. Some of the packages might build successfully even without python3-setuptools, because they fallback to distutils (from the Python standard library) if dependency on setuptools is not satisfied. To avoid such problems we will: * Mass update packages we analyzed as impacted to add the missing BuildRequires on python3-setuptools. * Do the change while doing the [[Changes/Python3.10|update from Python 3.9 to Python 3.10]] so the path of the `.egg-info` changes from `/usr/lib(64)/python3.9/site-packages/...egg-info` to `/usr/lib(64)/python3.10/site-packages/...egg-info`, hence no longer causing troubles on upgrades if some packages actually do change it from directory to file (and changing it the other way around in the future is
[Bug 1890590] EPEL8 Request: perl-Coro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 19:09:42 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2d9454fded has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1890793] EPEL8 Request: perl-Devel-REPL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 19:09:38 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9131b38ccb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932000] perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932000 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |7-1.fc35|7-1.fc35 |perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |7-1.fc32|7-1.fc32 |perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |7-1.fc33|7-1.fc33 ||perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 ||7-1.fc34 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1c0d2f1002 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1920120] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920120 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 |-1.fc34 |-1.fc34 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 |-1.fc32 |-1.fc32 ||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 ||-1.fc33 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2e46a9228e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1908112] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.30 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Locale-1.30-1 |perl-DateTime-Locale-1.30-1 |.fc34 |.fc34 ||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.30-1 ||.fc33 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 18:48:28 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b6ebd20fa8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1907739] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907739 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Locale-1.29-1 |perl-DateTime-Locale-1.29-1 |.fc34 |.fc34 ||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.30-1 ||.fc33 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2020-12-15 11:07:44 |2021-03-19 18:48:26 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b6ebd20fa8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-749331f4de has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-749331f4de` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-749331f4de See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210319.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/187 (x86_64), 10/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0): ID: 821833 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821833 ID: 821923 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821923 ID: 821927 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821927 ID: 821928 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821928 ID: 821929 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821929 ID: 821942 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821942 ID: 822050 Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822050 ID: 822063 Test: aarch64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822063 ID: 822066 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822066 ID: 822071 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822071 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0): ID: 821837 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821837 ID: 821848 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821848 ID: 821955 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821955 ID: 822032 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822032 Soft failed openQA tests: 5/126 (aarch64), 4/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0): ID: 822073 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822073 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0): ID: 821781 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821781 ID: 821806 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821806 ID: 821869 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821869 ID: 821891 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821891 ID: 821917 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821917 ID: 821922 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821922 ID: 821949 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821949 ID: 822015 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822015 Passed openQA tests: 111/126 (aarch64), 179/187 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0): ID: 821939 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821939 ID: 822061 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822061 ID: 822070 Test: aarch64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822070 ID: 822074 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822074 ID: 822075 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822075 ID: 822076 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822076 ID: 822077 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822077 ID: 822078 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822078 ID: 822079 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822079 ID: 822080 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822080 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.24 to 0.08 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820041#downloads Current test data:
Fedora-Rawhide-20210319.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 22/126 (aarch64), 12/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0): ID: 821532 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821532 ID: 821533 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821533 ID: 821534 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821534 ID: 821535 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821535 ID: 821581 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821581 ID: 821585 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821585 ID: 821586 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821586 ID: 821587 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821587 ID: 821589 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821589 ID: 821593 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821593 ID: 821594 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821594 ID: 821595 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821595 ID: 821597 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821597 ID: 821600 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821600 ID: 821680 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821680 ID: 821684 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821684 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0): ID: 821460 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821460 ID: 821477 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821477 ID: 821490 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821490 ID: 821495 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821495 ID: 821504 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821504 ID: 821506 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821506 ID: 821570 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821570 ID: 821612 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821612 ID: 821613 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821613 ID: 821626 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821626 ID: 821635 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821635 ID: 821689 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821689 ID: 821690 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821690 ID: 821697 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821697 ID: 821701 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821701 ID: 821724 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821724 ID: 821725 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821725 ID: 821729 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821729 Soft failed openQA tests: 48/126 (aarch64), 69/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0): ID: 821548 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821548 ID: 821598 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821598 ID: 821705 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_nfs@uefi URL:
Fedora Linux 34 Final blocker status update #1
With F34 Beta declared GO, it's time to switch focus to Final. As a
reminder, the Final freeze begins on 6 April, with a preferred target
date of 20 April.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — kbd-legacy missing from installs which need keyboard
layouts from it (switched layouts) — MODIFIED
ACTION: QA to verify anaconda-34.24.1-1
2. man-pages-l10n — File conflict with man-pages-de — MODIFIED
ACTION: QA to verify man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-2.fc34
3. man-pages-l10n — man-pages-es-extra is on Server DVD with
unresolved dependencies — MODIFIED
ACTION: QA to verify man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-3.fc34
4. sddm — logout after switch returns the user to console instead of sddm — NEW
ACTION: sddm maintainers to diagnose and fix issue
5. shim — include new bootloaders on Fedora 34 install media so UEFI
Secure Boot enabled systems can boot from them — ASSIGNED
ACTION: shim maintainers to provide shim signed with new key
Proposed blockers
-
1. abrt — Abrt does not catch a simulated segfault — NEW
ACTION: QA to gather more data and have other testers confirm
2. LiveCD - KDE — KDE live image shows update notifications — NEW
ACTION: fedora-live-kde-base.ks maintainer to remove plasma-discover
in kickstart file
3. systemd — resolved (with caching enabled) returns IPv6 IP despite
lack of global IPv6 connectivity — NEW
ACTION: systemd maintainers to diagnose and fix issue
Bug-by-bug detail
=
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919483 — MODIFIED
kbd-legacy missing from installs which need keyboard layouts from it
(switched layouts)
Languages like Russian which need a switched layout do not have that
layout available because of a change in dependencies.
anaconda-34.24.1-1 contains a candidate fix.
2. man-pages-l10n —
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928321 — MODIFIED
File conflict with man-pages-de
A new version of psmisc started to provide its own translated
manpages, which started to collide with man-pages-de.
man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-2.fc34 contains a candidate fix.
3. man-pages-l10n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929938 MODIFIED
man-pages-es-extra is on Server DVD with unresolved dependencies
man-pages-es-extra has a missing dependency (man-pages-es). The
man-pages-l10n -es subpackage should replace man-pages-es{,-extra}.
man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-3.fc34 contains a candidate fix, which
temporarily disables man-pages-es from man-pages-l10n.
4. sddm — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929643 — NEW
logout after switch returns the user to console instead of sddm
Using the "Switch User" functionality in sddm results in dropping to a
console: either to tty2 with a working text login prompt, or to tty1
where only a blinking cursor appears (no login prompt).
5. shim — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938630 — ASSIGNED
include new bootloaders on Fedora 34 install media so UEFI Secure Boot
enabled systems can boot from them
The current shim was signed in 2018 and its signing key was revoked
last year due to the Boothole vulnerability. We need a new shim to
make sure F34 images will boot on machines with Secure Boot enabled.
Proposed blockers
-
1. abrt — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937783 — NEW
Abrt does not catch a simulated segfault
abrt is not catching simulated segfaults when SELinux is enabled.
However it is not universally-reproducible, so further testing is
needed.
2. LiveCD - KDE — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939751 — NEW
KDE live image shows update notifications
Discover shows that updates are available, which live images are not
supposed to do. I looks like we need to remove plasma-discover in the
kickstart for KDE Live the way we've previously done for
plasma-pk-updates.
3. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940715 — NEW
resolved (with caching enabled) returns IPv6 IP despite lack of global
IPv6 connectivity
Beginning with systemd-248~rc2-8, resolved returns IPv6 addresses even
if the host has no IPv6 connectivity. According to Adam, the only
difference between -7 and -8 is that -8 has caching enabled.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933868] perl-Date-Manip-6.85 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Manip-6.85-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 17:44:12 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ccb745c82e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |35 |35 |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |33 |33 |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |32 |32 ||perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc ||34 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6d722c0083 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932390] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-FindDependencies- |perl-CPAN-FindDependencies- |3.05-1.fc35 |3.05-1.fc35 ||perl-CPAN-FindDependencies- ||3.05-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 17:38:04 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5a096a1b32 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933477] perl-IO-Compress-2.102 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933477 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Compress-2.102-1.fc |perl-IO-Compress-2.102-1.fc |35 |35 ||perl-IO-Compress-2.102-2.fc ||34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 17:42:11 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-faed82bb3c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-473e880567 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-473e880567 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |fc35|fc35 |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |fc32|fc32 |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |fc33|fc33 |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |el8 |el8 ||perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. ||fc34 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-95cae9f155 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1914227] perl-MooseX-App: FTBFS with Moose 2.2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914227 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-App-1.41-9.fc34 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 17:41:15 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2a909b87d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 16:35 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > With the current way of things (that could possibly change), when > EPEL 10 is > created, ELN is long gone in the RHEL 11 world. > > I could only imagine this scheme: > > ELN -> CentOS Stream N -> RHEL N > ELN Extra -> EPEL N Next -> EPEL N > > (With heroic efforts to align the arrows on the EPEL line to happen > very soon > after the arrows on the RHEL line.) > > Even if we somehow manage do this, what benefits does it bring over: > > ELN -> CentOS Stream N -> RHEL N > Rawhide/Branched -> EPEL N Next -> EPEL N > > ? There's two parts to this. On one hand, a package in eln-extra will be continuously built against ELN, and if the build breaks fixes will be pushed to Rawhide. This means that when the time comes to branch for the new EPEL, it's likely to work out of the box. The other point (and the one I'm specifically interested in) is that this makes it easier to do continuous testing using ELN. Specifically, my plan is to deploy ELN on a small number of systems and use it to spot potential issues and changes that would otherwise only show up when one starts testing the *next* CentOS Stream release. Ideally, this will make it easier to get stuff addressed and fixed in Rawhide, long before the next CentOS Stream even branches, which should results in benefits to both Fedora and CentOS Stream. However, to do this effectively I would also need to have a subset of EPEL available, as in reality we (as I suspect most people) always deploy CentOS Stream together with EPEL. So that's where the idea of having ELN builds for (a subset of) packages currently in EPEL started from, which then evolved in the eln-extra proposal that Troy posted here. Cheers Davide ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)
I'd advocate strongly against a compat package. The whole point of the change is to push the move to the new autoconf upstream release. Not the availability of autoconf 2.71 to the end user. For that, we would do much better with providing the end users with a modular release, I think. As for the argument of other distributions, Fedora has always been an early adopter. If we will create a compat package providing the 2.69 version, what's the point of moving to autoconf 2.71 (maybe over providing a modular build) anyway? What I would argue is that we should make an effort to fully move to the new version of autoconf, and postpone the change if we find out that it is not doable in time for F35. Historically, it took some effort to mitigate providing compat packages of autoconf, and experience tells us that when we do, the motivation to fix packages incompatible with the new version virtually disappears. IMO, the only scenario, where a compat package would make sense, is if we were to push for the removal of this compat package right from the moment of it's introduction. In that case, the only real benefit of completing the Autoconf 2.71 change, would be *a little* easier process of making necessary changes to now incompatible packages in exchange for any real motivation to actually do so. If the point of this change is the availability of autoconf 2.71 to the end-user, I would argue that a modular build would be a much cleaner approach. We should push for this change to be done the proper way, not for the possibility of making a slow progress over long period of time for the price of duplicating packages. If we need more time for that, this change should be postponed. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:27 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 09/03/21 09:15 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > >Some time ago gcc, binutils IIRC received an update for ac 2.71 so at > least > >those two should be by now off-the-table (Am I right?). > > No. GCC has a hard requirement on autoconf-2.69, but the Fedora > package doesn't need to run autoconf for it (that happens when > upstream creates the snapshot tarball). > > I'm not sure about binutils, but I would be very surprised if it is > different from GCC. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Patrik Novotný Associate Software Engineer Red Hat panov...@redhat.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-34-20210319.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210315.0): ID: 822081 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822081 ID: 822097 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822097 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210315.0): ID: 822089 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822089 ID: 822098 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822098 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210315.0): ID: 822083 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822083 Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210315.0): ID: 822082 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822082 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 13 of 31 Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: getty@tty6.service System load changed from 0.07 to 0.21 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/815546#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822082#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
New Fedora Account System Production Deployment - What this means for you
Background For the last 12 + months, the Community Platform Engineering team have been developing a new service to replace the current FAS2 application for the Fedora Account System. The FAS2 application was written over 10 years ago with python2 and TurboGears1 framework. Due to its dependencies, it is tied to a RHEL6 deployment and could not be moved to a newer OS without rewriting. Finally FAS2 has a very small deployment base and we had to maintain it all. The new account system is based on the widely used IPA product. We have created a community portal frontend for managing account details (noggin). This means we only need to maintain the frontend and can leave the high security parts to IPA. Additionally, noggin may be used by many more community products. Key Dates - Subject to Change* Tuesday 23rd March: Data sync to IPA Wednesday 24th & Thursday 25th March: System-Wide Outage for machine config to Noggin 25th March: Final Run-Through of Production Rollout 26th March: Production Rollout Complete 29th March March onwards: Support for post deployment issues We do not anticipate these dates to change, however our team will meet for a final review of work on Tuesday 23rd March and once satisfied all rollback paths are in place and risks have been mitigated, we intend to deploy to production against the dates listed above. Please keep an eye on this mail for any potential last minute updates What This Means for You Everyone If you have an otp token enrolled it will be needed everywhere. This will include logging in through ipsilon or getting a kerberos ticket(kinit) which was not previously the case. Outages and interruptions to services during migration dates System Administrators All system administrators will need to enroll a new otp token with noggin Sudo command will ask for First factor and Second factor separately which is a slight change from the previous password+otp prompt Packagers & Package Maintainers Any packager that has otp enabled will have to follow new process in docs for kinit/pkinit ‘Drive-By’ Contributors If you are a ‘drive-by’ or more casual contributor to the Fedora project, you may have to reset your password. We anticipate the number of people who will need to do this is low, depending on when you last logged in. Please re-sign into your Fedora account post migration date. Post Deployment Support If you experience issues with your workflow as a result of FAS changing please log an issue on the fedora infra tracker https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues. FAS will be left in a read-only state to support any applications that you might not be in a position to migrate immediately. However, we don’t recommend using it as the data it contains will quickly become out of date. Maintainer-test instances will be left in a “frozen” state which means any user changes such as new users or new ssh keys will not be reflected on these machines. Further Information Outage ticket link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9747 Community blog post: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/introducing-the-new-fedora-accounts/ Noggin Documentation: https://noggin-aaa.readthedocs.io/en/latest/userguide.html#user-accounts -- Ant Carroll Associate Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat Waterford Communications House Cork Road, Waterford City ancar...@redhat.com M: +353876213163 IM: ancarrol @redhatjobs redhatjobs @redhatjobs ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
New Fedora Account System Production Deployment - What this means for you
Background For the last 12 + months, the Community Platform Engineering team have been developing a new service to replace the current FAS2 application for the Fedora Account System. The FAS2 application was written over 10 years ago with python2 and TurboGears1 framework. Due to its dependencies, it is tied to a RHEL6 deployment and could not be moved to a newer OS without rewriting. Finally FAS2 has a very small deployment base and we had to maintain it all. The new account system is based on the widely used IPA product. We have created a community portal frontend for managing account details (noggin). This means we only need to maintain the frontend and can leave the high security parts to IPA. Additionally, noggin may be used by many more community products. Key Dates - Subject to Change* Tuesday 23rd March: Data sync to IPA Wednesday 24th & Thursday 25th March: System-Wide Outage for machine config to Noggin 25th March: Final Run-Through of Production Rollout 26th March: Production Rollout Complete 29th March March onwards: Support for post deployment issues We do not anticipate these dates to change, however our team will meet for a final review of work on Tuesday 23rd March and once satisfied all rollback paths are in place and risks have been mitigated, we intend to deploy to production against the dates listed above. Please keep an eye on this mail for any potential last minute updates What This Means for You Everyone If you have an otp token enrolled it will be needed everywhere. This will include logging in through ipsilon or getting a kerberos ticket(kinit) which was not previously the case. Outages and interruptions to services during migration dates System Administrators All system administrators will need to enroll a new otp token with noggin Sudo command will ask for First factor and Second factor separately which is a slight change from the previous password+otp prompt Packagers & Package Maintainers Any packager that has otp enabled will have to follow new process in docs for kinit/pkinit ‘Drive-By’ Contributors If you are a ‘drive-by’ or more casual contributor to the Fedora project, you may have to reset your password. We anticipate the number of people who will need to do this is low, depending on when you last logged in. Please re-sign into your Fedora account post migration date. Post Deployment Support If you experience issues with your workflow as a result of FAS changing please log an issue on the fedora infra tracker https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues. FAS will be left in a read-only state to support any applications that you might not be in a position to migrate immediately. However, we don’t recommend using it as the data it contains will quickly become out of date. Maintainer-test instances will be left in a “frozen” state which means any user changes such as new users or new ssh keys will not be reflected on these machines. Further Information Outage ticket link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9747 Community blog post: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/introducing-the-new-fedora-accounts/ Noggin Documentation: https://noggin-aaa.readthedocs.io/en/latest/userguide.html#user-accounts -- Ant Carroll Associate Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat Waterford Communications House Cork Road, Waterford City ancar...@redhat.com M: +353876213163 IM: ancarrol @redhatjobs redhatjobs @redhatjobs ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #9: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/9 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934823] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement()
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934823 Bug 1934823 depends on bug 1934824, which changed state. Bug 1934824 Summary: CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||slic3r-1.3.0-19.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-19 16:01:46 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-568e428c31 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaning pasystray, clipit, python-i3ipc, rnv
Eduard Lucena kirjoitti 19.3.2021 klo 16.57: I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit. Is possible for me to take it? You do not need to be a proven packager to adopt a package, being a "normal" packager is enough. In that case you just click a button at package's src.fp.o page [1] . In case you are not a packager yet, you need to go through the sponsoring procedure first, instructions are in the wiki [2]. It seems that mtasaka already adopted clipit, though. [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clipit [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210319.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210318.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210319.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 2 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:7.17 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 3.25 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1006 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Xfce raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Xfce-34-20210318.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-34-20210318.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: malaga-suomi-voikko-1.19-13.fc34 Summary: A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) RPMs:malaga-suomi-voikko Size:5.06 MiB Package: vino-3.22.0-20.fc34 Summary: A remote desktop system for GNOME RPMs:vino Size:2.11 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: lxsession-0.5.5-6.D20210130git8543c00a.fc34 Old package: lxsession-0.5.5-5.D20210130git8543c00a.fc34 Summary: Lightweight X11 session manager RPMs: lxpolkit lxsession lxsession-edit Size: 1.88 MiB Size change: 963 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Mamoru TASAKA - 0.5.5-6.D20210130git8543c00a - Avoid lxsession-xdg-autostart (with recent glib2) Package: realmd-0.17.0-3.fc34 Old package: realmd-0.17.0-2.fc34 Summary: Kerberos realm enrollment service RPMs: realmd realmd-devel-docs Size: 1.38 MiB Size change: 43 B Changelog: * Wed Mar 03 2021 Sumit Bose - 0.17.0-3 - Use authselect instead of authconfig Resolves: rhbz#1934124 = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
On 19. 03. 21 16:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote: On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote: Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only in Fedora and not ELN. I am not sure I underrated this problem entirely. I thought ELN is used as an additional repo on rawhide [1]. Hence, you get access to all the rawhide packages when you use ELN. Has that changed? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose#How_To_Test It has not. And I might not totally understand the problem either. It was other people who brought it up. I am merely proposing a solution to what I understand they were telling me. The closest I have to this problem is having some EPEL packages that I want to make sure don't break on RHEL, and I'd rather know sooner rather than later. But, as for me, I plan on using epel-next for that. What we had discussed last week at the ELN meeting was the possibility of opting in more packages to use the ELN buildroot as a way of pre-seeding EPEL for RHEL 10. The primary purpose of this would be to have a rolling bootstrap of EPEL 10, rather than the long gap after a RHEL release. With the current way of things (that could possibly change), when EPEL 10 is created, ELN is long gone in the RHEL 11 world. I could only imagine this scheme: ELN -> CentOS Stream N -> RHEL N ELN Extra -> EPEL N Next -> EPEL N (With heroic efforts to align the arrows on the EPEL line to happen very soon after the arrows on the RHEL line.) Even if we somehow manage do this, what benefits does it bring over: ELN -> CentOS Stream N -> RHEL N Rawhide/Branched -> EPEL N Next -> EPEL N ? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product > > > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only > > > in Fedora and not ELN. > > > > I am not sure I underrated this problem entirely. > > > > I thought ELN is used as an additional repo on rawhide [1]. Hence, you get > > access to all the rawhide packages when you use ELN. Has that changed? > > > > [1] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose#How_To_Test > > It has not. And I might not totally understand the problem either. > It was other people who brought it up. I am merely proposing a > solution to what I understand they were telling me. > > The closest I have to this problem is having some EPEL packages that I > want to make sure don't break on RHEL, and I'd rather know sooner > rather than later. > But, as for me, I plan on using epel-next for that. > What we had discussed last week at the ELN meeting was the possibility of opting in more packages to use the ELN buildroot as a way of pre-seeding EPEL for RHEL 10. The primary purpose of this would be to have a rolling bootstrap of EPEL 10, rather than the long gap after a RHEL release. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product > > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only > > in Fedora and not ELN. > > I am not sure I underrated this problem entirely. > > I thought ELN is used as an additional repo on rawhide [1]. Hence, you get > access to all the rawhide packages when you use ELN. Has that changed? > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose#How_To_Test It has not. And I might not totally understand the problem either. It was other people who brought it up. I am merely proposing a solution to what I understand they were telling me. The closest I have to this problem is having some EPEL packages that I want to make sure don't break on RHEL, and I'd rather know sooner rather than later. But, as for me, I plan on using epel-next for that. Troy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #7: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/7 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #6: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/6 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #5: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #9: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/9 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #8: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaning pasystray, clipit, python-i3ipc, rnv
I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit. Is possible for me to take it? El vie, 19 mar 2021 a las 5:19, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (< domi...@greysector.net>) escribió: > On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 20:44, Michael Šimáček wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Due to lack of time and motivation I've just orphaned the following > > packages which are now free to take: > > pasystray > > I would've taken pasystray as I use it, but it seems Yaakov beat me > to it. > > Yaakov, would you consider updating it to 0.7.1 in F33+, too? > > Regards, > Dominik > -- > Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org > There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and > oppression to develop psychic muscles. > -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56962318010 GNU/Linux User #589060 Ubuntu User #8749 Fedora Marketing Representative ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote: Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only in Fedora and not ELN. I am not sure I underrated this problem entirely. I thought ELN is used as an additional repo on rawhide [1]. Hence, you get access to all the rawhide packages when you use ELN. Has that changed? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose#How_To_Test -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210319.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210319.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 76 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.43 MiB Size of dropped packages:7.67 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 3.51 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -103.22 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Workstation raw-xz armhfp Path: Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20210318.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: awf-gtk2-2.2.0-1.fc35 Summary: Theme preview application for GTK RPMs:awf-gtk2 Size:262.01 KiB Package: awf-gtk3-2.2.0-1.fc35 Summary: Theme preview application for GTK RPMs:awf-gtk3 Size:268.35 KiB Package: ghc-retry-0.8.1.2-10.fc35 Summary: Retry combinators for monadic actions that may fail RPMs:ghc-retry ghc-retry-devel ghc-retry-doc ghc-retry-prof Size:978.95 KiB Package: golang-github-kodeworks-image-ico-0-0.1.20210318git73f0f4c.fc35 Summary: Golang support for Windows .ico file format RPMs:golang-github-kodeworks-image-ico-devel Size:10.95 KiB Package: librtprocess-0.12.0-1.20210318gitbc2f53b.fc35 Summary: RawTherapee's processing algorithms RPMs:librtprocess librtprocess-devel Size:888.89 KiB Package: python-docs-theme-2020.12-1.fc35 Summary: The Sphinx theme for the CPython docs and related projects RPMs:python3-docs-theme Size:18.59 KiB Package: python-pathvalidate-2.3.2-1.fc35 Summary: Library to sanitize/validate a string such as file-names/file-paths/etc RPMs:python3-pathvalidate Size:37.19 KiB Package: rust-humantime-serde-1.0.1-1.fc35 Summary: Serde support for the `humantime` crate RPMs:rust-humantime-serde+default-devel rust-humantime-serde-devel Size:23.15 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: felix-bundlerepository-2.0.10-11.fc33 Summary: Bundle repository service RPMs:felix-bundlerepository felix-bundlerepository-javadoc Size:519.05 KiB Package: malaga-suomi-voikko-1.19-13.fc34 Summary: A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) RPMs:malaga-suomi-voikko Size:5.06 MiB Package: vino-3.22.0-20.fc34 Summary: A remote desktop system for GNOME RPMs:vino Size:2.11 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: COPASI-4.30.240-1.fc35 Old package: COPASI-4.29.228-4.fc34 Summary: Biochemical network simulator RPMs: COPASI COPASI-data COPASI-doc COPASI-gui python3-COPASI Size: 105.90 MiB Size change: 413.06 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 18 2021 Antonio Trande - 4.30.240-1 - Release 4.30 build-240 Package: awscli-1.19.31-1.fc35 Old package: awscli-1.19.29-1.fc35 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 1.99 MiB Size change: -320 B Changelog: * Thu Mar 18 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.19.30-1 - 1.19.30 * Thu Mar 18 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.19.31-1 - 1.19.31 Package: bison-3.7.6-1.fc35 Old package: bison-3.7.4-2.fc34 Summary: A GNU general-purpose parser generator RPMs: bison bison-devel bison-runtime Size: 4.84 MiB Size change: 29.37 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Arjun Shankar - 3.7.6-1 - Update to bison 3.7.6 (#1920078) Package: ckb-next-0.4.4-1.fc35 Old package: ckb-next-0.4.3-3.fc35 Summary: Unofficial driver for Corsair RGB keyboards RPMs: ckb-next Size: 5.41 MiB Size change: 10.20 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 18 2021 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki - 0.4.4-1 - Update to v0.4.4 Package: clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.2.4-1.fc35 Old package: clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.2.2-2.fc34 Summary: Scripts to download unofficial clamav signatures RPMs: clamav-unofficial-sigs Size: 58.75 KiB Size change: -101 B Changelog: * Thu Mar 18 2021 J??n ONDREJ (SAL) - 7.2.4-1 - Update to upstream. Package: cockpit-240-1.fc35 Old package: cockpit-239-1.fc35 Summary: Web Console for Linux servers RPMs: cockpit cockpit-bridge cockpit-doc cockpit-kdump cockpit-machines cockpit-networkmanager cockpit-packagekit cockpit-pcp cockpit-selinux cockpit-sosreport cockpit-storaged cockpit-system cockpit-tests cockpit-ws Size: 19.33 MiB Size change: -51.11 KiB Changelog: * Wed Mar 17 2021 Marius Vollmer - 240-1 - New localization: Norwegian Bokm??l - Performance metrics: Journal integration - Machines: support authentication against cloud images Package: crossguid2-0.2.2-8.20190529gitca1bf4b.fc35 Old package: crossguid2-0.2.2-7.20190529gitca1bf4b.fc34 Summary: Lightweight cross platform C++ GUID/UUID library RPMs: crossguid2 crossguid2-devel Size: 195.55 KiB Size change: 954 B Changelog: * Thu Mar 18 2021 Antonio Trande - 0.2.2-8.20190529gitca1bf4b - Fix CMake commands Package: dbus-broker
Planned Outage - Fedora Account System Replacement - 2021-03-25 10:30 UTC
All, Fedora infrastructure is getting a new accounts system! To put this in place we will need an outage to our services. There will be an outage starting at 2021-03-25 10:30UTC, which will last approximately *TWO* days. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-03-25 10:30UTC' *Affected Services:* All Fedora Services - As this is the authentication system there may be issues logging in to some services. - Users may not be able to access people.fedoraproject.org or secondary.fedoraproject.org during the outage - Maintainer test instances are a special case and as such will be in a "frozen" state for access after the outage. This means that no updates will be made to users or ssh keys on these machines. Ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9747 If you have any questions or concerns please use any of the following methods of communication. - Comment on the ticket - IRC on #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc - Reply to this mail ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Planned Outage - Fedora Account System Replacement - 2021-03-25 10:30 UTC
All, Fedora infrastructure is getting a new accounts system! To put this in place we will need an outage to our services. There will be an outage starting at 2021-03-25 10:30UTC, which will last approximately *TWO* days. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-03-25 10:30UTC' *Affected Services:* All Fedora Services - As this is the authentication system there may be issues logging in to some services. - Users may not be able to access people.fedoraproject.org or secondary.fedoraproject.org during the outage - Maintainer test instances are a special case and as such will be in a "frozen" state for access after the outage. This means that no updates will be made to users or ssh keys on these machines. Ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9747 If you have any questions or concerns please use any of the following methods of communication. - Comment on the ticket - IRC on #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc - Reply to this mail ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:25 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this > week's ELN meeting. > > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only > in Fedora and not ELN. > > Solution: Create ELN Extra for those extra packages. > > Details: > - Create a new Fedora target and tag: eln-extra > -- eln-extra-build inherits from itself and eln-build > -- Successful builds are tagged with eln-extra > - Repo creation only, no images. > -- Repo creation is on the same timescale as ELN composes. > - Package list > -- Package list is kept in a git repo (pagure/gitlab/github) > -- Each package has it's requestor name/email associated with it. > - Builds trigger just like ELN > -- If a package successfully builds in Rawhide, and it is on the ELN > Extra list, it gets built in the ELN Extra target. > > Notes: > - This is not associated with EPEL in any way. > -- Just because a package is in ELN Extras does not mean it has to go > into EPEL. That is up to the EPEL package maintainer(s). > > Troy I wanted that to be a clean email, without clutter. I see two downsides to this. 1 - More Fedora resources (hardware and admins) used. 2 - More "ELN Spam" and this time to people who likely aren't Red Hat employees and/or maintaining a Fedora package in their own time. To me, this is the biggest downside. Troy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[ELN] Proposal: ELN Extra
I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this week's ELN meeting. Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only in Fedora and not ELN. Solution: Create ELN Extra for those extra packages. Details: - Create a new Fedora target and tag: eln-extra -- eln-extra-build inherits from itself and eln-build -- Successful builds are tagged with eln-extra - Repo creation only, no images. -- Repo creation is on the same timescale as ELN composes. - Package list -- Package list is kept in a git repo (pagure/gitlab/github) -- Each package has it's requestor name/email associated with it. - Builds trigger just like ELN -- If a package successfully builds in Rawhide, and it is on the ELN Extra list, it gets built in the ELN Extra target. Notes: - This is not associated with EPEL in any way. -- Just because a package is in ELN Extras does not mean it has to go into EPEL. That is up to the EPEL package maintainer(s). Troy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials-5.7.0
Hi all. This update is still pending. On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies: f35-build-side-37890 On 22/02/21 19:13, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? Release notes: https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #3: use NimbusSans-Bold font in test instead of phvr
zdohnal opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you are following: `` use NimbusSans-Bold font in test instead of phvr `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210319.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210318.0): ID: 821230 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821230 ID: 821237 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821237 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #1: Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing
zdohnal closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #1: Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing
zdohnal commented on the pull-request: `Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing` that you are following: `` Creating a new PR. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-749331f4de has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-749331f4de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Net-HTTP-6.21-1.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #1: Tests
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaning pasystray, clipit, python-i3ipc, rnv
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 20:44, Michael Šimáček wrote: > Hi, > > Due to lack of time and motivation I've just orphaned the following > packages which are now free to take: > pasystray I would've taken pasystray as I use it, but it seems Yaakov beat me to it. Yaakov, would you consider updating it to 0.7.1 in F33+, too? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #1: Tests
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210319.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210318.0): ID: 821216 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821216 ID: 821223 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821223 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-19 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/19/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210319git72726e42b.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
