date:20211216

It turns out that while a couple of packages I care about were actually 
broken by the bump to 3.0, most of them were instead broken by the 
update failing to install on F34[1].


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201

On 12/16/21 14:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] 
and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those 
maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from 
Koschei.


Unfortunately, because packages commonly pin a particular major version, 
and because pytest-cov has been in 2.x for a long time, a huge number of 
packages are likely to be affected.


It would be nice if Koschei could build against updates-testing so that 
problems like this could be more easily detected before the updates have 
already reached stable.


– Ben

[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3b53235332
[2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-379e60a35b

___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Recent python-pytest-cov update in F34/F35 causes many FTBFS

It turns out that while a couple of packages I care about were actually 
broken by the bump to 3.0, most of them were instead broken by the 
update failing to install on F34[1].


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201

On 12/16/21 14:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] 
and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those 
maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from 
Koschei.


Unfortunately, because packages commonly pin a particular major version, 
and because pytest-cov has been in 2.x for a long time, a huge number of 
packages are likely to be affected.


It would be nice if Koschei could build against updates-testing so that 
problems like this could be more easily detected before the updates have 
already reached stable.


– Ben

[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3b53235332
[2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-379e60a35b

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032454] perl-UUID-Tiny for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032454

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a68006ce1e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a68006ce1e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032454
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033073] Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-966d40c94d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-966d40c94d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1744782] (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Crypt-SSLeay

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744782

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9d7cecbfcd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9d7cecbfcd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744782
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2021-12-16 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-00d1f0f9b6   
libopenmpt-0.5.14-1.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1526755a59   
singularity-3.8.5-2.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-90ee9ed675   
ocsinventory-agent-2.9.0-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

R-qtl-1.50-1.el7
csmock-3.3.0-1.el7
debugbreak-1.0-4.el7
freexl-1.0.6-3.el7
mock-2.16-1.el7
mock-core-configs-36.4-1.el7
seamonkey-2.53.10.1-1.el7
uglify-js3-3.14.5-1.el7

Details about builds:



 R-qtl-1.50-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dedf0dccfa)
 Tools for analyzing QTL experiments

Update Information:

R-qtl 1.50

ChangeLog:

* Wed Dec 15 2021 Mattias Ellert  - 1.50-1
- Update to 1.50
* Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.48.1-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jun 14 2021 Tom Callaway  - 1.48.1-2
- Rebuilt for R 4.1.0




 csmock-3.3.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d1f0c5af29)
 A mock wrapper for Static Analysis tools

Update Information:

- update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Thu Dec 16 2021 Kamil Dudka  3.3.0-1
- update to latest upstream release




 debugbreak-1.0-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ec819ced94)
 Break into the debugger programmatically

Update Information:

Let the devel subpackage be noarch

ChangeLog:

* Thu Dec 16 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  1.0-4
- Let the devel subpackage be noarch
* Thu Dec 16 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  1.0-3
- Reduce macro indirection in the spec file




 freexl-1.0.6-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-90700253a8)
 Library to extract data from within an Excel spreadsheet

Update Information:

Modernize and clean up the packaging  - Properly install the license file - Move
documentation and examples to a -doc subpackage - Drop HTML documentation due to
bundled/minified web assets

ChangeLog:

* Thu Dec 16 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  - 1.0.6-2
- Backport packaging improvements from F36/Rawhide
- Disable HTML manual




 mock-2.16-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-82ccb8f2b7)
 Builds packages inside chroots

Update Information:

Release notes: https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-2.16
mock  - disable system call filtering - pass env to podman run
(d...@lapiole.org) - give user alternative help for missing 'epel-8-*' configs -
podman, explictily specify stdin as tar source (vreeland.jus...@gmail.com) - add
a new 'ssl_extra_certs' option (patr...@laimbock.com)  mock-core-configs  - add
CentOS Stream 9 + EPEL Next 9 (ngomp...@gmail.com) - add compatibility symlinks
for EPEL 7 to centos+epel-7-* (ngomp...@gmail.com) - EPEL 7 for AArch64 and
PPC64 are EOL (ngomp...@gmail.com) - resolve the multiple "local" repo collision
(from multiple templates) - configure the alternative help for missing
'epel-8-*' configs - Fedora 33 is EOL - rhelepel moved to rhel+epel - EOL the
EPEL Playground configs (ngomp...@gmail.com) - Add rocky+epel confs + Disable
devel-debug (tuckles...@gmail.com) - Rename epel to centos+epel
(ngomp...@gmail.com) - fix the root name and remove Next from the EPEL 9 configs
(ngomp...@gmail.com) - rename 'epel-next' to 'centos-stream+epel-next'
(ngomp...@gmail.com) - add epel9 repos to epel9 template (carl@george.computer)
- rhbz#2026571 - expand dnf_vars (msu...@redhat.com) - oraclelinux+epel configs
(carl@george.computer) - Add AlmaLinux+EPEL configs (ngomp...@gmail.com) - add
navy-8-x86_64 (a...@linux.com) - use quay.io

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

2021-12-16 Thread Jeremy Newton

> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> 
> I think that'd be awesome -- and those internal clean-ups are really
> appreciated. Having the infrastructure there is nice, but I'm also curious:
> are there any application-level tools that are in Fedora Linux already or
> which could be packaged, to serve as a showcase for the technology?

Well I think OpenCL would be a good starting point since it's been around for a 
while and lots of applications use it.

Fedora already has some of the base components already (hsakmt, rocm-runtime, 
llvm). For OCL, fedora would just need:
- ROCm-Device-Libs (bitcode compiled by LLVM, needed to upgrade rocm-runtime to 
the latest version)
- ROCm-CompilerSupport (LLVM plugin, used for runtime compilation)
- ROCclr (a middle layer that does the generic compute work)
- ROCm-OpenCL-Runtime (the opencl frontend for rocclr)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: HEADS UP: Update to tesseract-5.0.0 in rawhide

2021-12-16 Thread Brandon Nielsen


On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:

Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
Tesseract-5.0.0  appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other 
improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few 
hours before the push).


Sorry to pile on but I somehow lost the original e-mail.

"/usr/share/tessconfigs" seems to be missing so output to PDF or txt 
fails with "read_params_file: Can't open txt" or "read_params_file: 
Can't open pdf". Standard out works. Issue is similar to one mentioned 
upstream[0].


[0] - https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/issues/3411
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

2021-12-16 Thread Jeremy Newton

Yeah I think the technical leads are mostly on board with following FHS as 
close as possible, which is an obvious plus for Fedora.

I think the biggest issue is the scale of the problem, and it almost feel likes 
they need to work component by component, but [2] will definitely be fixed for 
all components once they're done assessing everything.

I think the thing I've been advocating for is to use GNUInstallDirs [4] as much 
as possible, which works really well with Fedora's cmake macros and other 
distro scripts.

If you have any other complaints, please let me know, and I can try to advocate 
for them. Unfortunately I work on the graphics side, so I'm not well versed in 
the ROCm github and the known issues.

[2] https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/issues/84
[4] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/GNUInstallDirs.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DIGLIM

== Summary ==
Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM) provides a repository of file
digests from authenticated sources, such as RPM headers, to be used by
kernel services for remote attestation and/or secure boot at
application level.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:robertosassu| Roberto Sassu]]
* Email: roberto.sa...@huawei.com

== Detailed Description ==
Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA), a kernel service for remote
attestation and secure boot at application level, has been integrated
in the kernel since a long time. However, two main barriers limited
its wide adoption. First, it extends a Platform Control Register (PCR)
of the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) in an unpredictable way (due to
parallel execution of software), making it impossible to use that PCR
for sealing policies of TPM keys. Second, it requires that a file
signature is added to the package header for each file to be
appraised.

Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM) takes a different approach. It
allows IMA to extend a PCR in a predictable way or to verify the
authenticity of files by querying an in-kernel repository of
authenticated reference values, built from information already
available in existing packages (FILEDIGESTS section of the RPM header,
with signature in the RSAHEADER section). Data source authentication
does not require additional key management. With support for PGP keys
in the kernel, the official Fedora PGP keys can be imported to the
builtin keyring of the kernel and used to verify the PGP signature of
the RPM headers.

DIGLIM is not specifically tied to IMA. Since it is based on the hash
table implementation of the kernel, it can store data of different
types or be used by other kernel subsystems. It might for example
store fsverity digests, to achieve the goal of another proposed
[//fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FsVerityRPM change] with less
overhead (by adding to the RPM header digests instead of signatures).
It might also be used by other kernel services, such as
[//lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/1634151995-16266-1-git-send-email-deven.de...@linux.microsoft.com/
Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE)], a new LSM being proposed for
inclusion in the upstream kernel.

A preliminary performance evaluation showed that DIGLIM does not
introduce a significant overhead. A repository of executables and
shared libraries digests, of a Fedora 33 minimal installation,
occupies less than 800k of memory.

The new feature behaves as follows. A modified kernel with the DIGLIM
patches will expose to user space an interface to add/remove file
digests from the kernel hash table. A user space parser, executed by
the kernel during early boot, parses RPM headers found in /etc/diglim
in the initial ram disk (included with a custom dracut script) and
uploads them to the kernel. When a file is accessed, IMA calculates
the file digest and queries it with DIGLIM. If the digest is found,
measurement is skipped and appraisal is successful. If the digest is
not found, a measurement of the file is performed and appraisal fails.
When packages are installed or removed, the kernel hash table is kept
synchronized with a new rpm plugin.

== Feedback ==
DIGLIM has been proposed some time ago, and was previously known as
IMA Digest Lists.

The original implementation was found to be too invasive, as both the
management of the repository of reference values and the new
measurement and appraisal mechanisms based on the query of the
repository needed to coexist with the existing code. DIGLIM is now
implemented as a standalone module, which includes the repository
management part, and exposes a simple API so that IMA and other kernel
services can use it to implement the query part (much simpler).

At the time IMA Digest Lists was published, the proposal of adding
file signatures to the package header was deemed to be more mature and
suitable for adoption. From [//pagure.io/fesco/issue/2547 previous]
and
[//lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JE2HGLJMLEKUJW3YBP6MQJWP43CSTC57/
current] discussions, it seems that Linux distribution vendors are a
bit reluctant to make such change, especially due to the increased
size of the packages. DIGLIM just requires a modification of the
kernel, rpm and dracut, and could work on old distribution versions
once the modified packages are installed.

Another remote attestation-specific issue is that the approach of
measuring only unknown software reduces the amount of information
available to remote verifiers for the integrity evaluation of the
system being attested. In particular, a measurement list made with the
DIGLIM approach does not show which file have been actually accessed
and when. This tradeoff was chosen to make the PCR value extended with
software measurements predictable and to allow the usage of sealing
policies based on that PCR.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
The main benefits of DIGLIM have been elaborated

F36 Change: Golang 1.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Note that this replaces the approved Golang 1.17 Change

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.18


== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36,
including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release
version of Go will be used for the rebuild if released version will
not be available at the time of the mass rebuild).


== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:alexsaezm| Alejandro Sáez Morollón]], [[User:Jcajka|
Jakub Čajka]]
* Email: a...@redhat.com, jca...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==

Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36. Golang
1.18 is scheduled to be released in February 2022.
Due to Go packages' current nature and state, the rebuild of dependent
packages will be required.


== Benefit to Fedora ==
Stay closely behind upstream by providing the latest release of Go,
which includes improved support of the risc-v processor architecture
and added support for aarch64 based darwin(macOS) machines, among
other bug fixes, enhancements and new features. For a complete list of
changes, see upstream change notes at
https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.18 . Therefore Fedora will be providing
a reliable development platform for Go language and projects written
in it.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Rebase Golang package in Fedora 36, help resolve
possible issues found during package rebuilds.
* Other developers: Fix possible issues, with help from Golang maintainers.
* Release engineering: Rebuild of dependent packages as part of
planned mass-rebuild.
* Policies and guidelines: N/A
* Trademark approval: N/A


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
None

== How To Test ==
;0.
:a) Install golang 1.18 from rawhide and use it to build your
application(s)/package(s).
:b) Scratch build against rawhide.
;1.
:Your application/package built using golang 1.18 should work as expected.

== User Experience ==

None

== Dependencies ==

dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'golang'
dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'compiler(go-compiler)'
dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'compiler(golang)'
dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'go-rpm-macros'


Omitted due to the number of packages listed ~1600.


Not all of listed require re-build as they might not ship binaries
and/or do not use golang compiler during build, but only use Go rpm
macros that pull it in to every build root.

== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism:Reverting to golang version 1.16.X if
significant issues are discovered.
* Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze(?)
* Blocks release? No
* Blocks product? No

== Documentation ==
https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.18




-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

FedoraRespin-35-updates-20211216.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Soas live x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 1/46 (x86_64)

ID: 1088228 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088228

Soft failed openQA tests: 2/46 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 1088199 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088199
ID: 1088216 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088216

Passed openQA tests: 43/46 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031818] perl-Test-MockObject for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031818

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
Needs perl-UNIVERSAL-can.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031818
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032441] perl-Test-MockModule for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032441

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
Needs perl-SUPER.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032441
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033436] Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2032440





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Depends On||2033436, 2033437





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436
[Bug 2033436] Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033437
[Bug 2033437] Please branch and build liblzf for EPEL-9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033439] Please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Blocks||2032440
 Depends On||2033438





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033438
[Bug 2033438] Please branch and build libecb for EPEL-9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2033439





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439
[Bug 2033439] Please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033439] New: Please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439

Bug ID: 2033439
   Summary: Please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-CBOR-XS
  Assignee: de...@fateyev.com
  Reporter: p...@city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: de...@fateyev.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9 ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033436] New: Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436

Bug ID: 2033436
   Summary: Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Coro-Multicore
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: p...@city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9 ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-12-16 Thread Demi Marie Obenour

On 12/12/21 8:26 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> 
>> Some more questions about how the verification happens… IIUC, I need to
>> load some keys to the kernel keyring, and then set 
>> fs.verity.require_signatures.
>>
>> Where do the keys come from? How are the keys themselves verified?
>> At what time are they loaded and by whom?
>>
>> (Let's say that I'm an attacker with access to the file system. If
>> the keys are loaded from the file system, can I just drop in a rogue key,
>> similarly to what happens when new keys are distributed as part of
>> distro upgrades?)
>>
>> If fs-verity verification prevents me from successfully modifying or
>> replacing /usr/bin/foo or /usr/lib/systemd/system/foo.service, is
>> there anything which hinders just adding /etc/systemd/system/foo.service
>> that does whatever I want?

There is not.  dm-verity is the only solution to that that I am aware of in
Linux.  dm-verity also solves the problem that someone could tamper with
the block device and exploit a vulnerability in the kernel's filesystem
drivers.

> Even if we do that, we can't rule out two scenarios:
> 
> * The attacker builds a (perhaps unrelated) Fedora package and lets
>   Fedora sign it with the official key.  The file signature is as good
>   as any other produced by Fedora.
> 
>   (Alternatively, the attacker reuses file contents signed elsewhere in
>   Fedora because it has an unintended side effect when used in a
>   different context.  This attack requires finding a suitable gadget in
>   some Fedora package, but a dodgy Fedora package build is not needed.)

NetBSD’s Veriexec has a neat solution to this problem, but it is
significantly more complicated.  It uses additional metadata to validate a
file.

> * The attacker (who could be the legitimate user) changes the system
>   configuration so that the feature is disabled during boot.
> 
> Neither we or hardware suppliers installing Fedora on their devices are
> permitted to plug the second hole because it's required for software
> freedom (or Fedora would have to share its private signing keys).

The obvious solution to the second problem is some form of measured boot:
if the feature is disabled, it shows up in the system measurements, and
access to various secrets may be denied by the TPM.  Android uses a similar
solution: at least on Google Pixel devices, one can unlock the bootloader,
but doing so erases all data on the device.

> The combination of these two unsolvable issues suggests to me that
> anyone who wants to deploy this is better off with their own trust root,
> and that approach will include their particular version of key
> management as well.  But this also means that pre-computed file
> signatures are not particular useful to them.  They would have to
> discard them anyway before deployment.  Their own signing process might
> as well check the RPM header signature instead.
+1 on this.  There have also been bugs in RPM's handling of IMA signatures,
and fs-verity signature handling could have similar issues.  Since IMA and 
fs-verity signatures are currently stored in the signature header, they can
be modified without changing the package signature, so they increase the
attack surface of RPM.

-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)


OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Packaging pgAdmin4

2021-12-16 Thread Demi Marie Obenour

On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
 On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
> node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bundles node_modules
> dir in svgo-2.8.0-nm-dev.tgz resp svgo-2.8.0-nm-prod.tgz.
 You can vendor only sources. No prebuilt assets are allowed.
>>> Which would basically mean bundling the node_modules folder?
>> No, it would mean bundling the source from which the stuff in
>> node_modules is generated.
> 
> Well this isn't what is the current nodejs packaging guidelines state 
> and as noted by Ben elsewhere in this thread would make it prohibitive 
> to package anything but the most trivial nodejs library.

If some of the dependencies are unnecessary, the package maintainers
could patch the code to not use them, and send the patches upstream.
That said, this really needs to be solved at the NPM level, by having
NPM packages include machine-extractable source code.

In any case, node_modules is not source code, since it is not “the
preferred form of the work for making modifications to it.” (quoting
LGPLv2.1 here, but I believe Fedora uses an equivalent definition).
The question then becomes whether it is more like bundling a prebuilt
binary, which is not acceptable, or like the bundling of the output 
of lex, yacc, or pandoc in autotools-generated tarballs, which I
consider fine.  One distinction might be whether the output files are
portable and can be automatically regenerated, which is invariably
true in the latter case.

-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DIGLIM

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:robertosassu| Roberto Sassu]]
* Email: roberto.sa...@huawei.com

== Feedback ==
DIGLIM has been proposed some time ago, and was previously known as
IMA Digest Lists.

At the time IMA Digest Lists was published, the proposal of adding
file signatures to the package header was deemed to be more mature and
suitable for adoption. From [//pagure.io/fesco/issue/2547 previous]
and
[//lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JE2HGLJMLEKUJW3YBP6MQJWP43CSTC57/
current] discussions, it seems that Linux distribution vendors are a
bit reluctant to make such change, especially due to the increased
size of the packages. DIGLIM just requires a modification of the
kernel, rpm and dracut, and could work on old distribution versions
once the modified packages are installed.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
The main benefits of DIGLIM have been elaborated

F36 Change: Golang 1.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Note that this replaces the approved Golang 1.17 Change

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.18


== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36,
including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release
version of Go will be used for the rebuild if released version will
not be available at the time of the mass rebuild).


== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:alexsaezm| Alejandro Sáez Morollón]], [[User:Jcajka|
Jakub Čajka]]
* Email: a...@redhat.com, jca...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==

Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36. Golang
1.18 is scheduled to be released in February 2022.
Due to Go packages' current nature and state, the rebuild of dependent
packages will be required.


== Benefit to Fedora ==
Stay closely behind upstream by providing the latest release of Go,
which includes improved support of the risc-v processor architecture
and added support for aarch64 based darwin(macOS) machines, among
other bug fixes, enhancements and new features. For a complete list of
changes, see upstream change notes at
https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.18 . Therefore Fedora will be providing
a reliable development platform for Go language and projects written
in it.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Rebase Golang package in Fedora 36, help resolve
possible issues found during package rebuilds.
* Other developers: Fix possible issues, with help from Golang maintainers.
* Release engineering: Rebuild of dependent packages as part of
planned mass-rebuild.
* Policies and guidelines: N/A
* Trademark approval: N/A


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
None

== How To Test ==
;0.
:a) Install golang 1.18 from rawhide and use it to build your
application(s)/package(s).
:b) Scratch build against rawhide.
;1.
:Your application/package built using golang 1.18 should work as expected.

== User Experience ==

None

== Dependencies ==

dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'golang'
dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'compiler(go-compiler)'
dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'compiler(golang)'
dnf repoquery -q  --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo='*'
--qf='%{name}' --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source
--enablerepo=updates-testing-source --archlist=src --whatrequires
'go-rpm-macros'


Omitted due to the number of packages listed ~1600.


Not all of listed require re-build as they might not ship binaries
and/or do not use golang compiler during build, but only use Go rpm
macros that pull it in to every build root.

== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism:Reverting to golang version 1.16.X if
significant issues are discovered.
* Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze(?)
* Blocks release? No
* Blocks product? No

== Documentation ==
https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.18




-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

FedoraRespin-35-updates-20211201.0 compose check report

Missing expected images:

Soas live x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 3/67 (x86_64), 1/18 (aarch64)

ID: 1084171 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1084171
ID: 1084192 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1084192
ID: 1088178 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088178
ID: 1088182 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088182

Soft failed openQA tests: 3/67 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 1075316 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1075316
ID: 1075331 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1075331
ID: 1076200 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1076200

Passed openQA tests: 41/67 (x86_64)

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 37 of 85
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

2021-12-16 Thread Reon Beon via devel

> Hi,
> 
> On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote:
> I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not
> the most 
> comfortable but at least
> I don't have to go to terminal for running firefox.
> 
> I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster).
> 
> I am afraid it is not default on neither F35 or F36.
> The lines for this feature seem to be commented out [0].
> I have submitted PR for this some time back [1].
> 
> JFTR is just a bugzilla ticket the preferred workflow for these changes?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jarek
> 
> [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/blob/f35/f/firefox.sh.in#_77
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/pull-request/36#
Yes that pull request should do it: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/pull-request/36
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

2021-12-16 Thread Reon Beon via devel

"Looks a similar ticket was
already filed: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921;

Yes it would be nice to remove firefox-wayland and re-enable the script for 
KDE/sway.

Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review request to fix FailsToInstall: mingw-qt6-qtshadertools

2021-12-16 Thread Sandro Mani



On 16.12.21 00:31, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:

Hi

I'd need mingw-qt6-qtshadertools reviewed:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221

mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative, which is currently FailsToInstall, grew a
dependency on it.


Happy to take this!


Happy to review in exchange!


I'll just hit you up with package ACL requests :)


Can I hit you with another review request? :)

mingw-qt6-qtpositioning - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033452


qtlocation grew a new dependency... (resp, this one was split out from 
qtlocation)


Thanks!
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Recent python-pytest-cov update in F34/F35 causes many FTBFS

2021-12-16 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 16. 12. 21 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] and 
F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those maintained 
through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from Koschei.


Unfortunately, because packages commonly pin a particular major version, and 
because pytest-cov has been in 2.x for a long time, a huge number of packages 
are likely to be affected.


A good opportunity to patch/sed coverage out of those packages for good :)

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

2021-12-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones


For anyone else wondering:

https://rocmdocs.amd.com/en/latest/index.html

  AMD ROCm is the first open-source software development platform for
  HPC/Hyperscale-class GPU computing. AMD ROCm brings the UNIX
  philosophy of choice, minimalism and modular software development to
  GPU computing.

  Since the ROCm ecosystem is comprised of open technologies: frameworks
  (Tensorflow / PyTorch), libraries (MIOpen / Blas / RCCL), programming
  model (HIP), inter-connect (OCD) and up streamed Linux® Kernel support
  – the platform is continually optimized for performance and
  extensibility. Tools, guidance and insights are shared freely across
  the ROCm GitHub community and forums.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Recent python-pytest-cov update in F34/F35 causes many FTBFS

It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] 
and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those 
maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from 
Koschei.


Unfortunately, because packages commonly pin a particular major version, 
and because pytest-cov has been in 2.x for a long time, a huge number of 
packages are likely to be affected.


It would be nice if Koschei could build against updates-testing so that 
problems like this could be more easily detected before the updates have 
already reached stable.


– Ben

[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3b53235332
[2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-379e60a35b
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 6431451a1c14540df448c1b83c498f7a13b6ded6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:20:40 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index b2d31fa..7a11d9e 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   14%{?dist}
+Release:   15%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2-15
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-14
 - Perl 5.32 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/6431451a1c14540df448c1b83c498f7a13b6ded6?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Update to 1.3 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 7344b951f09c4b41d8b4ff34561a98a599e768b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Jan 04 2021 17:57:59 +
Subject: Update to 1.3


- New upstream release 1.3
  - Do not leak memory on unsuccessful recv
- Use %license unconditionally

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 7a11d9e..6fa605d 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
-Version:   1.2
-Release:   15%{?dist}
+Version:   1.3
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -51,17 +51,18 @@ find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
 make test
 
 %files
-%if 0%{?_licensedir:1}
 %license COPYING
-%else
-%doc COPYING
-%endif
 %doc Changes README
 %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/IO/
 %{perl_vendorarch}/IO/
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Jan  4 2021 Paul Howarth  - 1.3-1
+- Update to 1.3
+  - Do not leak memory on unsuccessful recv
+- Use %%license unconditionally
+
 * Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2-15
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0d81447..53966eb 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1f60fc0e6b7982ceb45f63ba8a51e46e  IO-FDPass-1.2.tar.gz
+SHA512 (IO-FDPass-1.3.tar.gz) = 
2392074ce9d2bd7a5d2fcc8b359ef3a57c73258b33b637954ecbf00b15e44de05a211242ab245a47bd8cb18a5d928081a843e731563a23b5436fc2559a71968a



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/7344b951f09c4b41d8b4ff34561a98a599e768b8?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 7919426af89d9375552ec2d6db4dd52dd61b8843 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 23 2020 08:55:07 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 3e2f623..b2d31fa 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   13%{?dist}
+Release:   14%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-14
+- Perl 5.32 rebuild
+
 * Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2-13
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/7919426af89d9375552ec2d6db4dd52dd61b8843?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Use author-independent source URL"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From f62ede90dc0c84b06d27e6222ff9200465a4e913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Sep 28 2019 18:45:41 +
Subject: Use author-independent source URL


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index fada063..f5d1641 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   11%{?dist}
+Release:   12%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
-Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/M/ML/MLEHMANN/IO-FDPass-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/IO/IO-FDPass-%{version}.tar.gz
 # Module Build
 BuildRequires: coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils
 BuildRequires: gcc
 BuildRequires: make
-BuildRequires: perl-interpreter
 BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl-generators
+BuildRequires: perl-interpreter
 BuildRequires: perl(Canary::Stability)
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 # Module Runtime
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -delete
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
-%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
+%{_fixperms} -c %{buildroot}
 
 %check
 make test
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Sep 28 2019 Paul Howarth  - 1.2-12
+- Use author-independent source URL
+
 * Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2-11
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/f62ede90dc0c84b06d27e6222ff9200465a4e913?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 592b7121deb7ca4bdb42b4cf9427c75128cd4968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 26 2019 03:47:34 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index ae13c9c..fada063 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   10%{?dist}
+Release:   11%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-10
 - Perl 5.30 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/592b7121deb7ca4bdb42b4cf9427c75128cd4968?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 1a1dfda6223d67beb93abdf3a75c0cc3e9d1afc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:09:44 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index f5d1641..3e2f623 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   12%{?dist}
+Release:   13%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2-13
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Sep 28 2019 Paul Howarth  - 1.2-12
 - Use author-independent source URL
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/1a1dfda6223d67beb93abdf3a75c0cc3e9d1afc6?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 2a63f8167f2ba255f3ce7a7626012375e61581bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2019 05:31:50 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 8565b44..ae13c9c 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   9%{?dist}
+Release:   10%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-10
+- Perl 5.30 rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 01 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-9
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/2a63f8167f2ba255f3ce7a7626012375e61581bc?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From f333fe8cc19cf2c0297434ce5c38d13a309ecadb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 28 2018 04:36:31 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index d86b57e..9b562aa 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   6%{?dist}
+Release:   7%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jun 28 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-7
+- Perl 5.28 rebuild
+
 * Thu Feb 08 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/f333fe8cc19cf2c0297434ce5c38d13a309ecadb?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From edf9a82152fc2e3993c1c46fd2e87a879bfe10e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 08 2018 21:56:40 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 01fd8d0..437ba67 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   5%{?dist}
+Release:   6%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 08 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Aug 03 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/edf9a82152fc2e3993c1c46fd2e87a879bfe10e2?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 5cb0f29fa55f14ce246cbc073b8b64591b20722d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 13 2018 17:54:53 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 9b562aa..5e5d223 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   7%{?dist}
+Release:   8%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-8
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jun 28 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-7
 - Perl 5.28 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/5cb0f29fa55f14ce246cbc073b8b64591b20722d?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From d41466f100f6f71eb826aa2bf0f6f74a2ee9cb99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 01 2019 21:26:00 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 5e5d223..8565b44 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   8%{?dist}
+Release:   9%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 01 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-9
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-8
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/d41466f100f6f71eb826aa2bf0f6f74a2ee9cb99?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 4a4adb0e03b52e136662b5e64826007caf145925 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Aug 03 2017 05:23:33 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 2937386..01fd8d0 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   4%{?dist}
+Release:   5%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 03 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/4a4adb0e03b52e136662b5e64826007caf145925?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Update to 1.2 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From c08042c2c66203bc1a4290d7f32fe4dd49ea401b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Sep 25 2016 17:04:56 +
Subject: Update to 1.2


- New upstream release 1.2
  - Compatibility macros were still using C++ syntax, fortunately only
affecting the Solaris platform

---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index a325044..81098f8 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
-Version:   1.1
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   1.2
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Sep 25 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.2-1
+- Update to 1.2
+  - Compatibility macros were still using C++ syntax, fortunately only
+affecting the Solaris platform
+
 * Thu Sep 22 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.1-3
 - Incorporate package review feedback (#1378014)
   - Silence rpmlint warning about capitalization of UNIX in %%description
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index fa323e2..0d81447 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c01c8e99ccdd51900f2b21547aeedf98  IO-FDPass-1.1.tar.gz
+1f60fc0e6b7982ceb45f63ba8a51e46e  IO-FDPass-1.2.tar.gz



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/c08042c2c66203bc1a4290d7f32fe4dd49ea401b?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 2568770f6aa834d3efc2c89d4c568ea005931b1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 27 2017 04:24:29 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index fe1535e..2937386 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Release:   4%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jun 04 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-3
 - Perl 5.26 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/2568770f6aa834d3efc2c89d4c568ea005931b1b?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 5c41eba4272fd68f29d3842d3db5d98fe82ab93b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 11 2017 03:34:50 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 81098f8..e3585b2 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Sep 25 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.2-1
 - Update to 1.2
   - Compatibility macros were still using C++ syntax, fortunately only



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/5c41eba4272fd68f29d3842d3db5d98fe82ab93b?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Initial import (perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3) (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From e757b89eafe88bc49756924dd70dd93e902b8c15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Sep 22 2016 14:09:52 +
Subject: Initial import (perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3)


This small low-level module only has one purpose: pass a file descriptor to
another process, using a (streaming) UNIX domain socket (on POSIX systems) or
any (streaming) socket (on WIN32 systems). The ability to pass file descriptors
on Windows is currently the unique selling point of this module. Have I
mentioned that it is really small, too?

---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..169ba0c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/IO-FDPass-[0-9.]*.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..a325044
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
+Version:   1.1
+Release:   3%{?dist}
+Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
+License:   GPL+ or Artistic
+URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
+Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/M/ML/MLEHMANN/IO-FDPass-%{version}.tar.gz
+# Module Build
+BuildRequires: coreutils
+BuildRequires: findutils
+BuildRequires: gcc
+BuildRequires: make
+BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl-devel
+BuildRequires: perl-generators
+BuildRequires: perl(Canary::Stability)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+# Module Runtime
+BuildRequires: perl(XSLoader)
+# Test Suite
+BuildRequires: perl(Socket)
+# Dependencies
+Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
+Requires:  perl(XSLoader)
+
+# Avoid provides from private shared objects
+%{?perl_default_filter}
+
+%description
+This small low-level module only has one purpose: pass a file descriptor to
+another process, using a (streaming) UNIX domain socket (on POSIX systems) or
+any (streaming) socket (on WIN32 systems). The ability to pass file descriptors
+on Windows is currently the unique selling point of this module. Have I
+mentioned that it is really small, too?
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n IO-FDPass-%{version}
+
+%build
+PERL_CANARY_STABILITY_NOPROMPT=1 perl Makefile.PL \
+   INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}"
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -delete
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%if 0%{?_licensedir:1}
+%license COPYING
+%else
+%doc COPYING
+%endif
+%doc Changes README
+%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/IO/
+%{perl_vendorarch}/IO/
+%{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
+
+%changelog
+* Thu Sep 22 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.1-3
+- Incorporate package review feedback (#1378014)
+  - Silence rpmlint warning about capitalization of UNIX in %%description
+  - Quieten interaction with Canary::Stability during build process
+
+* Wed Sep 21 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.1-2
+- Sanitize for Fedora submission
+
+* Sat Sep 10 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.1-1
+- Initial RPM build
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..fa323e2 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+c01c8e99ccdd51900f2b21547aeedf98  IO-FDPass-1.1.tar.gz



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/e757b89eafe88bc49756924dd70dd93e902b8c15?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 59f2aa14a5a296720914ba8b57e99c39fe80c536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Jun 04 2018 12:54:46 +
Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN 



---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 437ba67..d86b57e 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Version:1.2
 Release:   6%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
-URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
+URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/M/ML/MLEHMANN/IO-FDPass-%{version}.tar.gz
 # Module Build
 BuildRequires: coreutils



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/59f2aa14a5a296720914ba8b57e99c39fe80c536?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 9833f773d7f2e3fc51fa0122c8fc8d4c4294b954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 04 2017 17:25:00 +
Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index e3585b2..9ddfef8 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.2
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   3%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-FDPass/
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Jun 04 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.2-3
+- Perl 5.26 rebuild
+
 * Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/9833f773d7f2e3fc51fa0122c8fc8d4c4294b954?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC

From 1f939576c95752d85886932929a1f2dbfba76719 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Jul 12 2017 12:31:05 +
Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter 



---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 9ddfef8..fe1535e 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ BuildRequires:coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils
 BuildRequires: gcc
 BuildRequires: make
-BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl-interpreter
 BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl-generators
 BuildRequires: perl(Canary::Stability)



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/1f939576c95752d85886932929a1f2dbfba76719?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

2021-12-16 Thread Tom Stellard


On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:

Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest 
and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that 
way.

There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would 
like to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages.

I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some internal 
processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance, 
clearer licensing, etc.
Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :)


Would you be interested in maintaining the existing packages?  I could use
some help keeping them up-to-date with the latest versions.

-Tom


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Mock v2.16 release, mock-core-configs v36.4

2021-12-16 Thread Pavel Raiskup

Hello!

I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock.  See the full
release notes [1].  The major change that happened is the removal of
'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on
*devel lists, big thanks to everyone for the discussion).

Note that this is is the last v2 release being shipped to all supported
Fedora/EPEL versions.  From now on, we'll move to v3 with development (in
'main' branch) and EPEL 7 stays on v2 (in 'mock-2' branch, bugfix only).

[1] https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-2.16
[2] https://pagure.io/epel/issue/133
[Fedora 35]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a7d4aaa6fe
[Fedora 34]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0947974f0a
[EPEL 8]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2d0f959e00
[EPEL 7]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-82ccb8f2b7

Happy building!
Pavel


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

2021-12-16 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim

Hi all,

`trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it
was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258

Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ourselves from it, e.g.

- for ARM, uboot-tools no longer pulls in vboot-utils which pulls in
  trousers: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JAAC32MNLJMMENVJG7QUSKHGZFABLUHX/

- Neal disabled TPM/TSS 1.2 support in strongswan, dropping the trousers
  dependency, in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/strongswan/pull-request/13

but there are several dependencies still around (strongswan still shows
up here as the PR just got merged a few hours ago)

```
~
❯ sudo dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide-source 
--whatrequires trousers-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Thu 16 Dec 2021 10:08:04 AM PST.
ecryptfs-utils-0:111-25.fc36.src
gnutls-0:3.7.2-2.fc35.src
golang-github-google-tspi-0:0.2.0-6.fc35.src
openconnect-0:8.10-7.fc35.src
strongswan-0:5.9.4-3.fc36.src
tpm-quote-tools-0:1.0.4-8.fc35.src
tpm-tools-0:1.3.9-12.fc36.src
vboot-utils-0:20190823-8.git595108c0.fc36.src
```

Do we want to keep trousers in Fedora? If so someone who needs it should 
probably step up, if not, we should toggle it off in these packages. 
Maintainers BCC:ed.

Best regards,
-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

2021-12-16 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim

Hi all,

`trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it
was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258

Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ourselves from it, e.g.

- for ARM, uboot-tools no longer pulls in vboot-utils which pulls in
  trousers: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JAAC32MNLJMMENVJG7QUSKHGZFABLUHX/

- Neal disabled TPM/TSS 1.2 support in strongswan, dropping the trousers
  dependency, in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/strongswan/pull-request/13

but there are several dependencies still around (strongswan still shows
up here as the PR just got merged a few hours ago)

```
~
❯ sudo dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide-source 
--whatrequires trousers-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Thu 16 Dec 2021 10:08:04 AM PST.
ecryptfs-utils-0:111-25.fc36.src
gnutls-0:3.7.2-2.fc35.src
golang-github-google-tspi-0:0.2.0-6.fc35.src
openconnect-0:8.10-7.fc35.src
strongswan-0:5.9.4-3.fc36.src
tpm-quote-tools-0:1.0.4-8.fc35.src
tpm-tools-0:1.3.9-12.fc36.src
vboot-utils-0:20190823-8.git595108c0.fc36.src
```

Do we want to keep trousers in Fedora? If so someone who needs it should 
probably step up, if not, we should toggle it off in these packages. 
Maintainers BCC:ed.

Best regards,
-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

I maintain the now-deprecated pure-Python “rocm-smi” package, and I’ve 
looked a few times at packaging rocm_smi_lib[1] to replace it, but the 
kinds of distro-friendliness issues you mention, e.g. [2][3], have so 
far been more than I was willing to work around.


I was also partially dissuaded by a general sense (which may or may not 
be accurate) that the main ROCm project’s issue tracker is dominated on 
both the filing and the responding side by high-volume end-user support 
questions, while the individual component projects have mostly technical 
bug reports but don’t always seem to have anyone reliably looking at them.


I’m happy to collaborate on work in this area as I am able, 
particularly—from a selfish perspective—if it leads to a maintainable 
rocm_smi_lib without too many downstream hacks, or if it eventually 
enables GPGPU in Darktable and/or BOINC without proprietary or 
unpackaged software. I think a lot of people would be *very* excited 
about that, if it is possible.


– Ben Beasley (FAS music)

[1] https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/
[2] https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/issues/84
[3] https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/issues/83

On 12/16/21 12:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:

Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest 
and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that 
way.

There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would 
like to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages.

I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some internal 
processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance, 
clearer licensing, etc.
Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

2021-12-16 Thread Matthew Miller

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some
> internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS
> compliance, clearer licensing, etc.
>
> Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests 
> :)

I think that'd be awesome -- and those internal clean-ups are really
appreciated. Having the infrastructure there is nice, but I'm also curious:
are there any application-level tools that are in Fedora Linux already or
which could be packaged, to serve as a showcase for the technology?

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033348] New: perl-Sub-Infix for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348

Bug ID: 2033348
   Summary: perl-Sub-Infix for EPEL 9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Sub-Infix
  Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040...@freenet.de
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-Sub-Infix for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Any interest in ROCm packaging?

2021-12-16 Thread Jeremy Newton

Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest 
and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that 
way.

There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would 
like to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages.

I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some internal 
processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance, 
clearer licensing, etc.
Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20211216.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
20 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 97/228 (x86_64), 67/159 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211215.n.0):

ID: 1087600 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087600
ID: 1087601 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087601
ID: 1087633 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087633
ID: 1087731 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087731
ID: 1087769 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087769
ID: 1087784 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087784
ID: 1087787 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087787
ID: 1087850 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087850
ID: 1087852 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087852
ID: 1087860 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087860
ID: 1087864 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087864
ID: 1087892 Test: aarch64 universal 
install_kickstart_firewall_configured@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087892
ID: 1087905 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087905
ID: 1087913 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087913
ID: 1087928 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_nfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087928
ID: 1087990 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087990
ID: 1087992 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087992

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211215.n.0):

ID: 1087547 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087547
ID: 1087548 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087548
ID: 1087549 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087549
ID: 1087550 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087550
ID: 1087551 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087551
ID: 1087552 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087552
ID: 1087556 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087556
ID: 1087557 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087557
ID: 1087559 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087559
ID: 1087566 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087566
ID: 1087569 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087569
ID: 1087571 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087571
ID: 1087574 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087574
ID: 1087575 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087575
ID: 1087576 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087576
ID: 1087577 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087577
ID: 1087578 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087578
ID: 1087587 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087587
ID: 1087588 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087588
ID: 1087593 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

[Bug 2031488] branch request: perl-ZMQ-Constants for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39775


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033349] New: perl-Test-Modern for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033349

Bug ID: 2033349
   Summary: perl-Test-Modern for EPEL 9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Test-Modern
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-Test-Modern for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033349
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: rust-find-crate

2021-12-16 Thread Robby Callicotte via devel

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 8:51:44 AM CST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Among other reasons, this is why I started to use fedora-create-review
> (from the fedora-review package) to submit my Package Review tickets,
> because it checks if a review request for the package already exists,
> before submitting a new one.

I was not aware of fedora-create-review.  Thank you for mentioning it.

-- 
Robby Callicotte
He/Him/His
Timezone: America/Chicago
IRC: c4t3l | Twitter: @robbycl2v

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: The great Mailman 3 / Hyperkitty upgrade: bumping flufl-lock and mistune?

2021-12-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen

On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 05:51, Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi all,

> > - epel-packagers-sig (collaborator, epel* branches) for helping to
> >bootstrap on new EL releases
>
> Fine by me, although I prefer actual maintainers to be responsible for EPEL
> branches.

Speaking of which. I am guilty of branching a bunch of python packages
in 2019 for EPEL-8 which the python team did not plan to maintain. I
need to take responsibility and be made the maintainer of those or
have them removed from EPEL-8.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle. -- Ian MacClaren
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: rust-find-crate

2021-12-16 Thread Fabio Valentini

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:55 AM Rémi Lauzier via devel
 wrote:
>
> A few months ago, i have open RHBZ#1983762 to include rust-find-crate in 
> fedora because i need it for rust-palette_derive. But now it seem to have 
> been integrate by another person without mentioning me that my bug was been 
> superseded. It would have been "fun" to have been informed so i could compile 
> the update for rust-palette_derive sooner.
>
> Maybe a bug as plague RHBZ and cause some problem?
> By the way, Should i close the now obsolete bug?

You can close the ticket that's no longer needed.
But I agree, it is not "good behaviour" to open duplicate package
review tickets without asking the previous submitter.

Among other reasons, this is why I started to use fedora-create-review
(from the fedora-review package) to submit my Package Review tickets,
because it checks if a review request for the package already exists,
before submitting a new one.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033327] Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jples...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
*** Bug 200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
Bug 2031486 depends on bug 200, which changed state.

Bug 200 Summary: perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033330] perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2021-12-16 14:38:31



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2033327 ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033330] New: perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200

Bug ID: 200
   Summary: perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel8
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-lib-abs
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks: 2031486
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you please branch and build perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8?



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||200





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
[Bug 200] perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033327] Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39767


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2033327





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327
[Bug 2033327] Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033327] New: Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327

Bug ID: 2033327
   Summary: Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-lib-abs
  Keywords: FutureFeature
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks: 2031486
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



I need it for perl-XML-Hash-LX. Could you please add the package into EPEL 8?



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-12-16 Thread Luca Boccassi

> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> 
> Hmm.  Some interesting stuff going on there but I would have started with a 
> new SELinux
> access vector.  That'd allow fine-grained constraints, e.g. disallowing 
> `init_t` but
> allowing `unconfined_service_t`.  Possibly also landlock should be able to 
> hook into this.
>  IOW it's not clear to me that a new LSM is the best thing for the ecosystem 
> here.
> 
> But bigger picture I'd agree that fs-verity is significantly stronger when 
> coupled
> with such a policy - strong enough to block exploits like the runc one:
> https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/breaking-docker-via-runc-explaining-c...

We use this in production, and those kind of constraints are just not enough, 
because there's too many obvious ways around them. What we needed is for the 
kernel to enforce that only signed code shall run, and thus IPE was born, so 
that when coupled with dm-verity/fs-verity it allows to enforce a policy like 
that.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
I don't feel confident in supporting mod_perl in EPEL9. If you need that
package there, I can give you permissions and you can maintain it there
yourself. What's your FAS username?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032857] please branch and build perl-Module-Install-CheckLib for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   ||b-0.14-1.el9
 QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |
Product|Fedora  |Fedora EPEL
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
  Component|perl-Module-Install-CheckLi |perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   |b   |b
Version|rawhide |epel9



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
The code is pushed but a build fails because of a Koji buildroot inconsistency.
Relengs notified at .


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033314] perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Net-DNS-1.33-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80085127


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033314] perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1846577
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1846577=edit
Update to 1.33 (#2033314)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033314] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314

Bug ID: 2033314
   Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Net-DNS
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: paul.wout...@aiven.io
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, ka...@ucw.cz,
mspa...@redhat.com, paul.wout...@aiven.io,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.33
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.32-2.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3147/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031488] branch request: perl-ZMQ-Constants for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488

Saad  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |jples...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486

Saad  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |jples...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

2021-12-16 Thread Jaroslav Prokop



It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you.


I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster).
Looks a similar ticket was already filed: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

2021-12-16 Thread Martin Stransky


On 12/16/21 14:02, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:

Hi,

On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote:

On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command 
line forever.
I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not the most 
comfortable but at least

I don't have to go to terminal for running firefox.


It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you.


I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster).

I am afraid it is not default on neither F35 or F36.
The lines for this feature seem to be commented out [0].
I have submitted PR for this some time back [1].

JFTR is just a bugzilla ticket the preferred workflow for these changes?


Hello,

yes, bugzilla ticket is the preferred workflow for all FF changes (I'm 
not getting mail notify from src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox).


Martin


Thanks,
Jarek

[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/blob/f35/f/firefox.sh.in#_77
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/pull-request/36#
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



--
Martin Stransky
Software Engineer / Red Hat, Inc
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

2021-12-16 Thread Jaroslav Prokop


Hi,

On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote:

On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command 
line forever.
I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not the most 
comfortable but at least

I don't have to go to terminal for running firefox.


It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you.


I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster).

I am afraid it is not default on neither F35 or F36.
The lines for this feature seem to be commented out [0].
I have submitted PR for this some time back [1].

JFTR is just a bugzilla ticket the preferred workflow for these changes?

Thanks,
Jarek

[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/blob/f35/f/firefox.sh.in#_77
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/pull-request/36#
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

CPE Weekly Update – Week of December 13th – 17th

2021-12-16 Thread Vipul Siddharth

Hi everyone,

This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a discourse post (or on our
commblog), check the post on discussion.fp.o:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/cpe-weekly-update-week-of-december-13th-17th/

# Highlights of the week

## Infrastructure & Release Engineering
Goal of this Initiative
---
Purpose of this team is to take care of day to day business regarding
CentOS and Fedora Infrastructure and Fedora release engineering work.
It’s responsible for services running in Fedora and CentOS
infrastructure and preparing things for the new Fedora release
(mirrors, mass branching, new namespaces etc.). The ARC (which is a
subset of the team) investigates possible initiatives that CPE might
take on.

Update
--

### Fedora Infra
* Log4j CVE affects our Openshift 3, mitigated via
[fix](https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6578441)
* Deployed an Openshift Dedicated cluster on AWS still deciding
* Lots of spam cleared off mailing lists

### CentOS Infra including CentOS CI
* Various activities/preparation for CentOS Linux 8 EOL process
* Proposal for SIGs to [switch to
RHEL8](https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2021-December/098779.html)
* Preparing needed steps to clear content and remove it from mirrorlist
* WIP for Meta group for SIGs, allowing to build+push their -release
pkgs (not having to depend on CentOS Stream team for this)
* Investigating [openshift template
issue](https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/555) for newer deployed
projects and jenkins
* Log4j CVE impact analysis (impacting OCP 4 if Elasticsearch is used,
which we are not using)
* Stream MVBE infra : renewal process for internal TLS cert

## CentOS Stream
Goal of this Initiative
---
This initiative is working on CentOS Stream/Emerging RHEL to make this
new distribution a reality. The goal of this initiative is to prepare
the ecosystem for the new CentOS Stream.

Updates
---
* Dealing with a slowdown in rpm signing
* Continuing the development Content Resolver enhancements
* Various cleanup and docs work at various places


## CentOS Duffy CI
Goal of this Initiative
---
Duffy is a system within CentOS CI Infra which allows tenants to provision and
access bare metal resources of multiple architectures for the purposes of
CI testing.
We need to add the ability to checkout VMs in CentOS CI in Duffy. We have
OpenNebula hypervisor available, and have started developing playbooks which
can be used to create VMs using the OpenNebula API, but due to the current state
of how Duffy is deployed, we are blocked with new dev work to add the
VM checkout functionality.

Updates
---
* Foundation for background tasks in place
* Started work on authentication and the session workflow
* CLI polish


## OSCI – Distrobaker monitoring
Goal of this Initiative
---
This initiative is to improve the Distrobaker monitoring to monitor
side-tags and module builds. Distrobaker is a service which rebuilds
the CentOS 9 Stream Koji builds for RHEL 9 in Brew.

Updates
---
* added a barebones implementation of gathering side tag metrics

## EPEL
Goal of this initiative
---
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) is a Fedora Special
Interest Group that creates, maintains, and manages a high quality set
of additional packages for Enterprise Linux, including, but not
limited to, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS and Scientific
Linux (SL), Oracle Linux (OL).

EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will
never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux
distributions. EPEL uses much of the same infrastructure as Fedora,
including buildsystem, bugzilla instance, updates manager, mirror
manager and more.

Updates
---
* No updates - team on time offs

Kindest regards,
CPE Team
-- 
Vipul Siddharth
He/His/Him
Fedora | CentOS CI Infrastructure Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033073] Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-966d40c94d has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-966d40c94d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2026088] perl-CPAN-2.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026088

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-2.29-1.fc36
Last Closed||2021-12-16 12:19:06




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026088
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211216.n.0 changes

2021-12-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211215.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211216.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  14
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   124
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  9.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages:6.27 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   4.11 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   6.68 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Design_suite live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20211216.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: ant-antunit-1.4.1-2.fc36
Summary: Unit Test Framework for Ant Tasks
RPMs:ant-antunit ant-antunit-javadoc
Size:378.56 KiB

Package: cfn-lint-0.56.3-1.fc36
Summary: CloudFormation Linter
RPMs:cfn-lint
Size:1.89 MiB

Package: php-psr-container2-2.0.2-1.fc36
Summary: Common Container Interface version 2
RPMs:php-psr-container2
Size:10.35 KiB

Package: php-zumba-json-serializer-3.0.1-1.fc36
Summary: Serialize PHP variables
RPMs:php-zumba-json-serializer
Size:14.71 KiB

Package: python-b4-0.8.0-1.fc36
Summary: A helper tool to work with public-inbox and patch series
RPMs:b4
Size:111.11 KiB

Package: python-geotiler-0.14.5-2.fc36
Summary: GeoTiler is a library to create map using tiles from a map provider
RPMs:python-geotiler-doc python3-geotiler
Size:341.17 KiB

Package: python-jschema-to-python-1.2.3-1.fc36
Summary: Generate source code for Python classes from a JSON schema
RPMs:python3-jschema-to-python
Size:25.31 KiB

Package: python-odata-query-0.4.1-1.fc36
Summary: An OData v4 query parser and transpiler for Python
RPMs:python3-odata-query python3-odata-query+django 
python3-odata-query+sqlalchemy
Size:73.89 KiB

Package: python-patatt-0.4.9-1.fc36
Summary: Add cryptographic attestation to patches sent via email
RPMs:patatt
Size:45.41 KiB

Package: python-sarif-om-1.0.4-1.fc36
Summary: Classes implementing the SARIF 2.1.0 object model
RPMs:python3-sarif-om
Size:51.70 KiB

Package: qt6-qtpositioning-6.2.2-1.fc36
Summary: Qt6 - Positioning component
RPMs:qt6-qtpositioning qt6-qtpositioning-devel qt6-qtpositioning-examples
Size:6.28 MiB

Package: rust-crc1-1.8.1-1.fc36
Summary: Rust implementation of CRC(16, 32, 64) with support of various 
standards
RPMs:rust-crc1+default-devel rust-crc1+std-devel rust-crc1-devel
Size:32.42 KiB

Package: rust-itoa0.4-0.4.8-1.fc36
Summary: Fast functions for printing integer primitives to an io::Write
RPMs:rust-itoa0.4+default-devel rust-itoa0.4+i128-devel 
rust-itoa0.4+std-devel rust-itoa0.4-devel
Size:41.35 KiB

Package: rust-zmq-0.9.2-1.fc36
Summary: High-level bindings to the zeromq library
RPMs:rust-zmq+default-devel rust-zmq+zmq_has-devel rust-zmq-devel
Size:88.01 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: qt6-qtlocation-6.2.1-1.fc36
Summary: Qt6 - Location component
RPMs:qt6-qtlocation qt6-qtlocation-devel qt6-qtlocation-examples
Size:6.27 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  R-BH-1.78.0.0-1.fc36
Old package:  R-BH-1.75.0.0-4.fc35
Summary:  Boost C++ Header Files for R
RPMs: R-BH-devel
Size: 9.33 MiB
Size change:  288.76 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Dec 15 2021 Tom Callaway  - 1.78.0.0-1
  - update to 1.78.0-0


Package:  R-qtl-1.50-1.fc36
Old package:  R-qtl-1.48.1-3.fc35
Summary:  Tools for analyzing QTL experiments
RPMs: R-qtl
Size: 26.46 MiB
Size change:  -19.19 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Dec 15 2021 Mattias Ellert  - 1.50-1
  - Update to 1.50


Package:  alsa-sof-firmware-1.9.3-1.fc36
Old package:  alsa-sof-firmware-1.9.2-1.fc36
Summary:  Firmware and topology files for Sound Open Firmware project
RPMs: alsa-sof-firmware alsa-sof-firmware-debug
Size: 610.53 KiB
Size change:  -683 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Dec 15 2021 Jaroslav Kysela  - 1.9.3-1
  - Update to v1.9.3


Package:  anaconda-36.12-1.fc36
Old package:  anaconda-36.11-1.fc36
Summary:  Graphical system installer
RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui 
anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui 
anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel
Size: 20.21 MiB
Size change:  -136.26 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 14 2021 Packit Service  - 
36.12-1
  - New version - 36.12 (Martin Kolman)
  - Retire execInSysroot (Vladimir Slavik)
  - Retire all uses of execInSysroot in bootloader (Vladimir Slavik)
  - Stop using execInSysroot in FixZIPLBootloaderTask (Vladimir Slavik)
  - Remove the root= kwarg of execInSysroot (Vladimir Slavik)
  - Replace the only execInSysroot call using root= (Vladimir Slavik)
  - Fix ShellCheck issues in translation_canary (Vladimir Slavik)
  - network: always use rd.iscsi.ibft when the need to access an iBFT device 
(Lubomir Rintel)
  - Remove the dracut_args attribute (Vendula Poncova

[EPEL-devel] Re: Requesting branches for epel9

2021-12-16 Thread Neal Gompa

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:26 AM Matthew Miller  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:31:04AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > Where is that checklist? I found
> > I don't know myself.
>
> Fair -- a lot of this stuff is individual experience and wisdom that we
> haven't recorded, but need to.
>
>
> > > But it seems like "request an EPEL branch" should generally be either 
> > > "Okay!
> > > Doing that automatically now" or "Oh, this is in EL, sorry"*. What are the
> > > other cases?
> >
> > As far as I know this isn't about requesting EPEL branches, as much as
> > requesting any branches by hand. If I add something to Fedora rawhide
> > and then ask for a F34 branch, the same issues can happen. Remember
> > our build infrastructure is a pile of band-aids on top of duct tape on
> > top of bungee cords. Lots of tools are written for a toolchain which
> > existed years ago and have been hacked to make it work with whatever
> > new initiative that comes into play. 'Unexpected' side effects and
> > corner cases happen all the time and the fixing of them tends to add
> > new ones.
>
> Sure. But also, asking people to spend a lot of their time running
> grunt-work tasks means that they have less time to fix when things break,
> let alone re-engineer away some of that tech debt. It seems like we should
> be able to automate the simple cases (adding F34 and F35 branches should be
> even easier, since we don't have the "is it in EL?" question even).
>

It is also possible to automate the "is it in EL?" question too, since
we now have access to a Koji instance we can query for that
information. According to the CentOS Stream 9 contributor guide[1], if
it's in c9s-compose, then it's published content.

[1]: 
https://docs.centos.org/en-US/stream-contrib/quickstart/#_whats_going_on_with_package_x



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211216.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211215.0):

ID: 1087301 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087301
ID: 1087312 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1087312

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: Evžen Gasta

2021-12-16 Thread David Kirwan

Welcome Evžen!

On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 09:13, Benson Muite 
wrote:

> On 12/16/21 12:01 PM, evzen...@seznam.cz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic.
> > Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno.
> >
> > I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as my Bachelor's
> > thesis.  About which am I also writing a blog.
> Welcome. MediaWriter is a very useful piece of software. Looking forward
> to your improvements.
> >
> > I'm using Fedora KDE for 3 years so far.
> >
> > I've learned about Fedora project from long-time member @jgrulich
> > 
> >
> > Thanks for opportunity to join
> > Evžen
> >
> >
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> >
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 
David Kirwan
Software Engineer

Community Platform Engineering @ Red Hat

T: +(353) 86-8624108 IM: @dkirwan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   ||b-0.14-1.fc36



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033073] Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for EPEL 9