Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Akira TAGOH]

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:41 PM Neal Becker  wrote:
>
> Sorry, don't understand the question.  I was testing with non-variable fonts, 
> all were "mono".

Ah, okay. my proposal was basically to replace with variable fonts. so
I was assuming it may be a variable font and you may see some issue
because of it. Anyway, that's fine then. also looking forward to
hearing your feedback on other applications.

>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:45 PM Akira TAGOH  wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:08 AM Neal Becker  wrote:
>> >
>> > After seeing this proposal I tried playing with Noto Sans Mono.  I
>> > find that while it comes with many weights, none look right to me.
>> > Language is English.
>> >
>> > I'm testing in emacs.  My usual default is Source code sans semibold
>> > and I find that very pleasing.  I also tried Dejavu Sans Mono
>> > semibold, which looks very similar.  But if I try Noto Sans Mono, no
>> > weight looks right.  Medium is too light, and the next weight,
>> > semibold, is too heavy.
>>
>> Thank you for the feedback. one question just comes to mind.
>> Do you see any difference when you try it again with a non-variable
>> font of Noto Sans Mono?
>>
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:59 PM Robert Marcano via devel
>> >  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On 12/29/21 2:20 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:27 PM Artem Tim  
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cantarell current default UI font in GNOME (Workstation) will be 
>> > > >> replaced by Noto font as well or remain?
>> > > >
>> > > > The current plan is to keep Cantarell for now, though GNOME upstream
>> > > > may decide to switch to Noto as KDE Plasma did years ago.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Does Noto have the default font-variant-numeric as tabular-nums? (non
>> > > proportional decimal digits) because it will be a welcomed change.
>> > >
>> > > The current default of Cantarell makes any number showing application a
>> > > pain to style, specially on toolkits that use the system font but are
>> > > unable to change font variants (Java Swing with GTK Look and Feel).
>> > >
>> > > Even GNOME applications aren't properly styled for number entry use
>> > > cases. See for example Calculator where 111,111,111 looks like a smaller
>> > > number than 99,999,999 when the are one on top of the other, because the
>> > > font is proportional by default.
>> > > ___
>> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > List Archives: 
>> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
>> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
>> > ___
>> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives: 
>> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
>> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Akira TAGOH
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
>
>
> --
> Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
Akira TAGOH
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 

[Bug 2037978] perl-Test-EOL for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037978

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e3df0017e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e3df0017e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037978
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812



--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius  ---
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #1)
> Also depends on, which don't have a bug filed yet :
> 
> perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-CGI-Compile
Owned by eseyman.

> perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI
Owned by eseyman.

> perl-Cookie-Baker
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-Devel-StackTrace-WithLexicals
Owned by jplesnik 

> perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple
Owned by cheeselee.

> perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
Owned by ppisar, epel-maintainer orion.

> perl-HTTP-Parser-XS
Owned by eseyman.

> perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI
Owned by eseyman, epel-maintainer ppisar

> perl-Hash-MultiValue
Owned by cheeselee.

> perl-IO-Handle-Util
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-LWP-Protocol-http10
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-Log-Dispatch-Array
Owned by jplesnik

> perl-Stream-Buffered
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*

> perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded
Made you "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "remove package.cfg per new epel-playground policy"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From f981ac13bd4f4a764f2529b17067da883b4a6bea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy Dawson 
Date: Sep 24 2020 16:39:59 +
Subject: remove package.cfg per new epel-playground policy


---

diff --git a/package.cfg b/package.cfg
deleted file mode 100644
index 66ea79d..000
--- a/package.cfg
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-[koji]
-targets = epel8 epel8-playground
\ No newline at end of file



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/f981ac13bd4f4a764f2529b17067da883b4a6bea?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "Spec tweaks for EPEL-8 (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From d716d576f0f8a8acd98e7f7f2b758db45b3182e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: Spec tweaks for EPEL-8


- Use author-independent source URL
- Use %{make_build} and %{make_install}
- Fix permissions verbosely
- Make %files list more explicit

---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 5302dbf..87aede6 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Release:10%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
-Source0:
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/T/TO/TOBYINK/Sub-Infix-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Sub/Sub-Infix-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
-
-BuildRequires:  %{__perl}
-BuildRequires:  %{__make}
-
-BuildRequires:  perl-interpreter >= 0:5.006
+# Build
+BuildRequires:  coreutils
+BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl-generators
+BuildRequires:  perl-interpreter >= 0:5.006
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.76
+# Module
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.17
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.47
 BuildRequires:  perl(overload)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
-
-# optional
+# Optional Functionality
 BuildRequires:  perl(Scalar::Util)
 Recommends: perl(Scalar::Util)
-
-Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo 
$version))
+# Test Suite
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.47
+# Dependencies
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
 
 %description
 Sub::Infix creates fake infix operators using overloading. It doesn't use
@@ -35,24 +35,30 @@ source filters, or Devel::Declare, or any of that magic.
 %setup -q -n Sub-Infix-%{version}
 
 %build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
-%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1 NO_PERLLOCAL=1
+%{make_build}
 
 %install
-%{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+%{make_install}
+%{_fixperms} -c %{buildroot}
 
 %check
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc Changes README CREDITS
 %license COPYRIGHT LICENSE
-%{perl_vendorlib}/*
-%{_mandir}/man3/*
+%doc Changes README CREDITS
+%{perl_vendorlib}/Sub/
+%{_mandir}/man3/Sub::Infix.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Oct 24 2019 Paul Howarth  - 0.004-10
+- Spec tweaks for EPEL-8
+  - Use author-independent source URL
+  - Use %%{make_build} and %%{make_install}
+  - Fix permissions verbosely
+  - Make %%files list more explicit
+
 * Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-9
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/d716d576f0f8a8acd98e7f7f2b758db45b3182e0?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 6e8bb65b21b7046f80a243b24a42c65303a5cfa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 99f7799..5302dbf 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-9
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-8
 - Perl 5.30 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/6e8bb65b21b7046f80a243b24a42c65303a5cfa2?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From fcb98809201c1e5909e1d715c4d1565cbb7a4148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index f175a17..99f7799 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-8
+- Perl 5.30 rebuild
+
 * Sat Feb 02 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-7
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/fcb98809201c1e5909e1d715c4d1565cbb7a4148?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From e782e655fe7457a81374c3a86ec56b5d04e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index df42587..f175a17 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Feb 02 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/e782e655fe7457a81374c3a86ec56b5d04e3?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 28b7802d99e0d5a6d9077a99701c8063409f00ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index b8b26e0..df42587 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jun 28 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-5
 - Perl 5.28 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/28b7802d99e0d5a6d9077a99701c8063409f00ee?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 6f0c07d0319f9a7998144a5d15435df01e4affcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN 



---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 461d650..26163ef 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ Version:0.004
 Release:4%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
-URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Infix/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TO/TOBYINK/Sub-Infix-%{version}.tar.gz
+URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
+Source0:
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/T/TO/TOBYINK/Sub-Infix-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
 
 BuildRequires:  %{__perl}



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/6f0c07d0319f9a7998144a5d15435df01e4affcf?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 74cf60176ce9619a35d098c77e49e7c9d8ff3e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:53 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 26163ef..b8b26e0 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jun 28 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-5
+- Perl 5.28 rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 09 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/74cf60176ce9619a35d098c77e49e7c9d8ff3e74?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f28' into epel8"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From ec53410a81049c954ed000a2de3c30ab4c58f3ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Oct 24 2019 14:49:43 +
Subject: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f28' into epel8


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..f0e12af 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Sub-Infix-0.004.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..461d650
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
+Version:0.004
+Release:4%{?dist}
+Summary:Create a fake infix operator
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Infix/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TO/TOBYINK/Sub-Infix-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+
+BuildRequires:  %{__perl}
+BuildRequires:  %{__make}
+
+BuildRequires:  perl-interpreter >= 0:5.006
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
+BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.17
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.47
+BuildRequires:  perl(overload)
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
+
+# optional
+BuildRequires:  perl(Scalar::Util)
+Recommends: perl(Scalar::Util)
+
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo 
$version))
+
+%description
+Sub::Infix creates fake infix operators using overloading. It doesn't use
+source filters, or Devel::Declare, or any of that magic.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Sub-Infix-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
+%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+%{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%doc Changes README CREDITS
+%license COPYRIGHT LICENSE
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Fri Feb 09 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
+
+* Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
+
+* Mon Jun 05 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-2
+- Perl 5.26 rebuild
+
+* Fri Feb 03 2017 Ralf Corsépius  0.004-1
+- Initial Fedora package.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..31c6d66 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+SHA512 (Sub-Infix-0.004.tar.gz) = 
e9253bdb39e6e03569d2663d95ebb2b32bd1454dbca9d0e79def43e0e13240b8082ca5bbf3d632506d2ef60d160b67e64b2427906048e979dc9796e38bc1b2fb



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/ec53410a81049c954ed000a2de3c30ab4c58f3ca?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). ""Adding package.cfg file""

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 071e156f617fc11f39e57096c7818997e379d450 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gwyn Ciesla 
Date: Oct 24 2019 13:34:39 +
Subject: "Adding package.cfg file"


---

diff --git a/package.cfg b/package.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 000..66ea79d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package.cfg
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+[koji]
+targets = epel8 epel8-playground
\ No newline at end of file



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/071e156f617fc11f39e57096c7818997e379d450?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 90eb84b69391a6684ba75ac905ac8771223c371a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 09 2018 00:50:21 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 4fc0326..461d650 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Infix/
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 09 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/90eb84b69391a6684ba75ac905ac8771223c371a?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From e14623db2412a546d998a6f89f494b17ee94cebe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 27 2017 06:12:03 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index cad846e..4fc0326 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Infix/
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Jun 05 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-2
 - Perl 5.26 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/e14623db2412a546d998a6f89f494b17ee94cebe?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From e0d5ecce8e8d92b561300b07462e07c13e3975e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 05 2017 10:49:26 +
Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 9d44f79..e757eb6 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Infix/
@@ -53,5 +53,8 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Jun 05 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-2
+- Perl 5.26 rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 03 2017 Ralf Corsépius  0.004-1
 - Initial Fedora package.



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/e0d5ecce8e8d92b561300b07462e07c13e3975e4?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 7a9d38161f5af9db01368bc6aa3c59e28faaca8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Jul 12 2017 12:31:48 +
Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter 



---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index e757eb6..cad846e 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  %{__perl}
 BuildRequires:  %{__make}
 
-BuildRequires:  perl >= 0:5.006
+BuildRequires:  perl-interpreter >= 0:5.006
 BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/7a9d38161f5af9db01368bc6aa3c59e28faaca8c?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel9). "Initial Fedora package."

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-05 19:15:07 UTC

From 7f0657cf6f6d960c98ed23baf0a24008198ce635 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius 
Date: Feb 10 2017 15:27:32 +
Subject: Initial Fedora package.


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..f0e12af 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Sub-Infix-0.004.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..9d44f79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
+Version:0.004
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Create a fake infix operator
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Infix/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TO/TOBYINK/Sub-Infix-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+
+BuildRequires:  %{__perl}
+BuildRequires:  %{__make}
+
+BuildRequires:  perl >= 0:5.006
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
+BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.17
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.47
+BuildRequires:  perl(overload)
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
+
+# optional
+BuildRequires:  perl(Scalar::Util)
+Recommends: perl(Scalar::Util)
+
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo 
$version))
+
+%description
+Sub::Infix creates fake infix operators using overloading. It doesn't use
+source filters, or Devel::Declare, or any of that magic.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Sub-Infix-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
+%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+%{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%doc Changes README CREDITS
+%license COPYRIGHT LICENSE
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Fri Feb 03 2017 Ralf Corsépius  0.004-1
+- Initial Fedora package.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..31c6d66 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+SHA512 (Sub-Infix-0.004.tar.gz) = 
e9253bdb39e6e03569d2663d95ebb2b32bd1454dbca9d0e79def43e0e13240b8082ca5bbf3d632506d2ef60d160b67e64b2427906048e979dc9796e38bc1b2fb



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/7f0657cf6f6d960c98ed23baf0a24008198ce635?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth  said:
> On 1/6/22 7:53 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >ifcfg scripts don't run an RA server.  You can set signaling radvd,
> >which can also be done with NM dispatcher scripts (which would be much
> >more flexible, since it wouldn't be hard-coded to just radvd like the
> >ifcfg scripts).
> 
> Do you use this in real-life?
> 
> How do you get the PD address into the radvd config using NM dispatcher?

No, I haven't done this (been considering it though for a project).  But
if I wanted to not use NM for IPv6 PD, I just wouldn't use NM for IPv6
PD at all (not use it for part and then try to pass the info out).  So
do it like the ifcfg scripts, I guess using dhclient and radvd.

But, for that matter, I have no idea how ifcfg handles it, since I can't
find any documentation about it.  The only references to radvd in the
ifcfg doc are for 6to4/PPP.  Which is part of the problem with the ifcfg
scripts anyway - there's a pile of undocumented functionality with
hard-coded assumptions (like, what if I want to use some other software
for IPv6 PD).  At least with NM, the docs are better (IMHO), the UI is
better, and the dispatcher is flexible for many more situations.

It might be a good feature request for NM to export PD info, since it's
not listed in the NM-dispatcher man page.

-- 
Chris Adams 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Self Introduction: XingHong Chen

[Chen, Xinghong]

Hello all:

I'm Xinghong from the Intel NPG-QAT team. I'm very interested in becoming a 
Fedora package Co-maintainer. My responsibility is to upgrade and maintain the 
"QATzip" package.

Here is the brief summary about QATzip:

"QATzip is a user space library which builds on top of the Intel(r) QuickAssist 
Technology user space library, to provide extended accelerated compression and 
decompression services by offloading the actual compression and decompression 
request(s) to the Intel(r) Chipset Series. QATzip produces data using the 
standard gzip* format (RFC1952) with extended headers. The data can be 
decompressed with a compliant gzip* implementation. QATzip is designed to take 
full advantage of the performance provided by Intel(r) QuickAssist Technology."

It's very glad to join Fedora community. Also a little bit information about 
myself:

I have been a Software Engineer in Intel for 2 years since my graduation.  
During these years, I have built up a range of technical skills and domain 
knowledge in the Deep learning compiler, Intel GPU architecture validation, and 
Video codec. I enjoy exploring the new technologies and learning cutting-edge 
compute science knowledge. Also, I'm very easygoing and kindly man.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2022551] perl-HTTP-Message-6.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036779] perl-Term-Table-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-3e03a16093 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-3e03a16093`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3e03a16093

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037406] perl-HTTP-Message-6.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b61ec76a69   
mbedtls-2.16.12-1.el8
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-771af857c2   
pgbouncer-1.16.1-2.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

python-testing.common.database-2.0.3-3.el8
rubygem-hrx-1.0.0-5.el8
xe-guest-utilities-latest-7.30.0-3.el8

Details about builds:



 python-testing.common.database-2.0.3-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3b3fbe15aa)
 Utilities for testing.* packages

Update Information:

Add extra Python Provides consistent with Fedora

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan  6 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley  2.0.3-3
- Add extra Python Provides consistent with Fedora




 rubygem-hrx-1.0.0-5.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93dba1d333)
 An HRX parser and serializer

Update Information:

Initial build on epel8

ChangeLog:

* Tue Jul 27 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.0-5
- Second attempt - Rebuilt for
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jan 27 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.0-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.0-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Dec  3 2019 Leigh Scott  - 1.0.0-1
- Initial package

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1780674 - [RFE] EPEL8 branch of rubygem-hrx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780674




 xe-guest-utilities-latest-7.30.0-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0d04fe97bf)
 XAPI Virtual Machine Monitoring Scripts

Update Information:

Fix version info

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan  6 2022 Robin Lee  7.30.0-2
- Properly override version info (RHBZ#2037556)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2037556 - xe-guest-utilities-latest-7.30.0-1 breaks reporting 
driver version to XAPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037556


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033906] ctstream-31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ctstream-31-1.fc36  |ctstream-31-1.fc36
   |ctstream-31-1.fc34  |ctstream-31-1.fc34
   |ctstream-31-1.fc35  |ctstream-31-1.fc35
   |ctstream-31-1.el8   |ctstream-31-1.el8
   ||ctstream-31-1.el7



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7bc8bb8542 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032452] perl-Test-Perl-Critic for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d86bf94d16 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d86bf94d16

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037731] Please build perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037731

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e929422237 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e929422237

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037731
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037954] perl-MIME-Lite-HTML for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037954

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2bd331543e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2bd331543e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037954
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037728] Please build perl-File-LibMagic for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037728

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c5f7aec898 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c5f7aec898

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037728
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037549] Please branch and build perl-PPI-HTML for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037549

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8682c7378f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8682c7378f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037549
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033967] Add perl-JSON-Any to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b7427e4acc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b7427e4acc

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2034404] perl-Convert-PEM for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034404

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e1101172d9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e1101172d9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034404
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033689] perl-Module-Install-TestBase for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033689

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-63a746e9a7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-63a746e9a7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033689
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037517] Please branch and build perl-PPIx-Regexp for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037517

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2928b91ade has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2928b91ade

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037517
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037699] Add perl-MooseX-Types to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037699

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0a5f073c99 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0a5f073c99

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037699
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2030279] Please branch and build perl-Test-XML in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030279

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c2333257c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c2333257c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030279
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031123] perl-XML-Filter-BufferText for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031123

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c2333257c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c2333257c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031123
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037002] Please branch and build perl-Convert-Bencode_XS for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037002

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9469af3d21 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9469af3d21

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037002
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031117] perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031117

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c2333257c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c2333257c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031117
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1811577] perl-Finance-Quote EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811577
Bug 1811577 depends on bug 1811624, which changed state.

Bug 1811624 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-HTML-TableExtract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811624

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811577
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1811624] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-HTML-TableExtract

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811624

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-TableExtract-2.15
   ||-9.el8
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:37:05



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3afd09548b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811624
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033906] ctstream-31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ctstream-31-1.fc36  |ctstream-31-1.fc36
   |ctstream-31-1.fc34  |ctstream-31-1.fc34
   |ctstream-31-1.fc35  |ctstream-31-1.fc35
   ||ctstream-31-1.el8



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e2766060cf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031488] branch request: perl-ZMQ-Constants for epel8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-ZMQ-Constants-1.04-23.
   ||el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:36:59



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7bec6cc361 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:36:55



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8c1de464f7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
Bug 2031486 depends on bug 2033327, which changed state.

Bug 2033327 Summary: Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033327] Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:36:57



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8c1de464f7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031484] Please branch and build perl-Hash-Merge in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031484

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Hash-Merge-0.302-4.el9
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:26:17



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6f30e2081b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031484
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031760] perl-Crypt-URandom for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031760

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:26:09



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6fc91b4964 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031760
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031330] Please branch and build perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031330
Bug 2031330 depends on bug 2031484, which changed state.

Bug 2031484 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Hash-Merge in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031484

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031330
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031484] Please branch and build perl-Hash-Merge in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031484
Bug 2031484 depends on bug 2031489, which changed state.

Bug 2031489 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Clone-Choose in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031489

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031484
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031801] perl-HTML-Template for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031801

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Template-2.97-16.
   ||el9
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:26:20



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-739ea2e5e0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031801
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033613] Add perl-Const-Fast to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033613

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:26:11



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a82e843126 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033613
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033601] Add perl-Geo-Distance to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033601
Bug 2033601 depends on bug 2033613, which changed state.

Bug 2033613 Summary: Add perl-Const-Fast to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033613

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033601
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033439] Please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439
Bug 2033439 depends on bug 2033438, which changed state.

Bug 2033438 Summary: Please branch and build libecb for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033438

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033436] Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:26:04



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d81fa8efeb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032452] perl-Test-Perl-Critic for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452
Bug 2032452 depends on bug 2033072, which changed state.

Bug 2033072 Summary: Please branch and build miniz for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033072

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032452] perl-Test-Perl-Critic for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452
Bug 2032452 depends on bug 2033071, which changed state.

Bug 2033071 Summary: Please branch and build csnappy for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033071

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
Bug 2032440 depends on bug 2033436, which changed state.

Bug 2033436 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037406] perl-HTTP-Message-6.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2022551] perl-HTTP-Message-6.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2034053] perl-Inline-Struct-0.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034053

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f |perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f
   |c36 |c36
   |perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f |perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f
   |c34 |c34
   ||perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f
   ||c35



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-8d561beecd has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034053
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033906] ctstream-31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ctstream-31-1.fc36  |ctstream-31-1.fc36
   |ctstream-31-1.fc34  |ctstream-31-1.fc34
   ||ctstream-31-1.fc35



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-6d39235a6f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Module-Install-CheckLi |perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   |b-0.14-1.fc36   |b-0.14-1.fc36
   |perl-Module-Install-CheckLi |perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   |b-0.14-1.fc34   |b-0.14-1.fc34
   ||perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   ||b-0.14-1.fc35



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version|perl-Module-Install-CheckLi |perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   |b-0.14-1.fc36   |b-0.14-1.fc36
   ||perl-Module-Install-CheckLi
   ||b-0.14-1.fc34
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:10:31



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033906] ctstream-31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|ctstream-31-1.fc36  |ctstream-31-1.fc36
   ||ctstream-31-1.fc34
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:10:33



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-703beae31b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033906
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2034053] perl-Inline-Struct-0.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034053

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f |perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f
   |c36 |c36
   ||perl-Inline-Struct-0.28-1.f
   ||c34
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-01-07 01:10:35



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-1bbab30f91 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034053
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: use of kernel/yama/ptrace_scope in rpm scriptlets

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Fabio Valentini  writes:

>> if [ -e "..kernel/yama/ptrace_scope" ]; then
>>echo "0" > ..kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
>> fi
>> or, as it seems to be an irrelevant message, use > /dev/null ?

See elfutils-default-yama-scope, though it uses a sysctl file rather
than an echo.

- FChE
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037994] New: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.44 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037994

Bug ID: 2037994
   Summary: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.44 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
spo...@gmail.com, st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 3.44
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.43-478.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-ParseXS/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2871/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037994
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |xav...@bachelot.org




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032424] perl-Crypt-X509 for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032424

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |xav...@bachelot.org




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032424
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031539] Please branch and build perl-Log-Dispatch in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031539

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2031812





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031539
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2031812





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031329] Please branch and build perl-Log-Log4perl in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2031812





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2030601, 2031539, 2031329
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot  ---
Also depends on, which don't have a bug filed yet :

perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler
perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd
perl-CGI-Compile
perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI
perl-Cookie-Baker
perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML
perl-Devel-StackTrace-WithLexicals
perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple
perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
perl-HTTP-Parser-XS
perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI
perl-Hash-MultiValue
perl-IO-Handle-Util
perl-LWP-Protocol-http10
perl-Log-Dispatch-Array
perl-Stream-Buffered
perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329
[Bug 2031329] Please branch and build perl-Log-Log4perl in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031539
[Bug 2031539] Please branch and build perl-Log-Dispatch in epel9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2037979





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037979
[Bug 2037979] perl-Test-NoTabs for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037979] New: perl-Test-NoTabs for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037979

Bug ID: 2037979
   Summary: perl-Test-NoTabs for EPEL 9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Test-NoTabs
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2037951
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-Test-NoTabs for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037979
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037978] New: perl-Test-EOL for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037978

Bug ID: 2037978
   Summary: perl-Test-EOL for EPEL 9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Test-EOL
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2037951
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-Test-EOL for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037978
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2037978





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037978
[Bug 2037978] perl-Test-EOL for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2037975





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037975
[Bug 2037975] perl-File-Slurper for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037975] New: perl-File-Slurper for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037975

Bug ID: 2037975
   Summary: perl-File-Slurper for EPEL 9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-File-Slurper
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2037951
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-File-Slurper for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037975
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

[Inglis, Malcolm via devel]

Well, turns out https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors isn't allowing PRs.

I've pushed to a branch here with updates and dead-link-fixes for the README: 
https://pagure.io/fork/mcinglis/packager-sponsors/tree/pr-readme-update 

@Kevin Fenzi , you're welcome to pull that (or use it) into the repo if you 
think it looks good. Aside link fixes, it conditionalizes the blurb about 
"don't apply for sponsorship unless you have packages that have gone through 
package review process", which I think is what deterred me here.

Cheers,
Malcolm

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 21:30:02 +, Malcolm Inglis  wrote:
> Thanks, Fabio!
>
> I'm sorry I missed the process to cut a ticket in packager-sponsors.
> I've done that now: https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/511
>
> That doc page was one of the few I was bouncing around until I opted
> to email this list. That page linked to the repo's README, which then
> linked "Procedure for new packagers" to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
> , which linked back to the original doc page. That page had a section
> on "How to find a sponsor", which seemed to imply I'd need to find a
> sponsor to volunteer *before* moving ahead. Meanwhile, I noticed that
> several 'Self Introduction' emails on this list had sought and
> received sponsorship, so I figured this was a way that would work.
>
> It may help if said doc page elaborated the process, perhaps by
> describing an example request, and if the README on
> `packager-sponsors` was also elaborated and updated to not link to
> dead wikis. I can try to send some PRs to help out there.
>
> I understood why `packager` membership is required for various
> infrastructure access; it makes perfect sense to avoid managing
> effectively-free-world-writable storage :) I don't believe I raised
> any contention there. The PR that Maxwell linked seems very appealing,
> though. It would be great if PRs with new sources from
> non-packager-members could pass CI without any action from
> maintainers.
>
> The problem that Maxwell raised about sources updates is not one that
> I've experienced. I've had a PR with new sources be accepted as-is
> just fine (
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-prompt-toolkit/pull-request/1
> ).  It's just that the CI run was failing (as per state of my other
> outstanding PRs) until the maintainer stepped in.
>
> Cheers, Malcolm
>
> P.S. my apologies for letting my corporate mailserver rules mess up
> the thread subject by adding '[EXTERNAL]'. I'll try to catch that in
> future.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

PyPy3.8 now available

[Miro Hrončok]

Hello Pythonistas.

PyPy3.8 is now available in Fedora.

On rawhide, when you dnf install pypy3, or when you run the pypy3 command, you 
will get PyPy3.8. PyPy3.7 is still available for the time being (pypy3.7 
package and command).


On Fedora 35, when you dnf install pypy3, or when you run the pypy3 command, 
you will still get PyPy3.7. pypy3.8 package will be available from updates 
testing when the build finishes and I'll create the bodhi update.


On Fedora 34, when you dnf install pypy3, or when you run the pypy3 command, 
you will still get PyPy3.6. pypy3.8 package will be available in updates 
testing soon: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e29bfb393



--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Demi Marie Obenour]

On 1/6/22 13:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday, January 6, 2022 1:02:36 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 08:48:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
 (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell script, or maybe something
 in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know audit.)> 
> 
> It would be better if there was a systemctl solution. Any solution I 
> implement will be met with you need to migrate to systemctl. There have been 
> multiple bz opened and closed on this.

What would you need in order to be able to migrate to systemctl?  Could
the dbus daemon or systemd generate the necessary audit records?  Or could
auditctl handle everything itself, perhaps by talking to auditd over a
socket instead of sending a signal?
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 03:57:57PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thursday, January 6, 2022 3:23:15 PM EST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > There actually is magic in the kernel that records who sent a signal to
> > > > the audit daemon and the  necessary atributes. This functionality has
> > > > been there since at least 2005. It's not new.
> > > 
> > > Right, so is /usr/bin/stop-audit with the following contents the
> > > solution:
> > > ---
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > set -e
> > > exec kill $(systemctl show -P MainPID auditd)
> > > ---
> > > ?
> 
> In essense, yeah. But there are a lot more signals than just SIGTERM and as I 
> said before, the systemd crowd has done such a good job taking over this 
> space that everyone will start asking that this be migrated to systemctl so 
> there is one and only one way to do things.

auditd(8) lists 5 signals… This should be doable in two dozen lines.
This would cover the requirement to have those direct invocations logged.

> > I do not believe this is currently usable for audit because the
> > information on who requested to kill the process is lost this way.
> > 
> > In terms of audit you can audit that user XYZ ran /usr/bin/stop-audit,
> > however the process that actually then kills the audit daemon will not
> > have the magic markers in the kernel side and will instead be the
> > systemd process.
> 
> Yep, that is the crux of the problem.
> 
> > This breaks the audit log chain, as there is no way to audit that
> > systemd is operating on behalf of that user. The audit trail chain is
> > broken by the systemcl -> systemd jump.
> 
> This is the two generals problem. (How do you know the message really came 
> from the other general when it traveled through hostile territory?)
> 
> > This is the problem that need to be solved to get rid of audit's use of
> > shell scripts that directly perform operations wrt the kernel.
> 
> There have been several proposals. One is that systemctl could check a config 
> file and see that it needs to send a signal and which one. Another is systemd 
> could look it up in the unit files and answer back that systemctl should send 
> a signal instead.

There are two ways to look at this: one way is that people interact with
auditd from the commandline and the script that was discussed above is a good
replacement that provides ~same functionality as what we have now.

Another way is to say that people interact with auditd through systemd,
and since the dbus api is open, there is an infinite number of ways to
call it, including systemctl, systemctl -M (injection into a container),
systemctl -H (ssh into another machine), the KDE systemd graphical wrapper
that I forgot how is called, busctl call, pydbus scripting.

While at least theoretically we could implement direct sending of signals
in systemctl, this would do nothing for the other approaches. And we certainly
are not going to implement direct sending of signals in those other places,
it wouldn't even be possible for the non-local transports.

Since auditd is started by systemd, you just _have_ to trust systemd.
If control over the manager is lost, the manager can just do anything
it wants, masquerading as any user. So the logging provided by recording
of the direct signal is only a "good will" effort, fairly easy to spoof
if you've actually gained some inappropriate privileges. The logging
that systemd does is effectively just as trustworthy as the audit log
as long as the system integrity is maintained.

So I think the approach with the script is good because it satisfies the
requirements, as far as they made sense when they were formulated. It could
never cover the more modern dbus-based approaches anyway.

Zbyszek


> > I wonder if another option is to have the audit code in the kernel
> > intercept systemcl messages sent to systemd and interpret the commands
> > and log what they are asking ...
> 
> That's a new one.  :-)
> 
> I'm afraid that would require knowing which sockets are part of the dbus comm 
> system and its protocol. Parsing dbus messages in the kernel is not something 
> the upstream kernel maintainers will take lightly. I'd expect pushback on 
> that.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037954] perl-MIME-Lite-HTML for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037954

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2bd331543e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2bd331543e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037954
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037951] perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|xav...@bachelot.org
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40569


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037954] New: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037954

Bug ID: 2037954
   Summary: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML for EPEL 9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
  Assignee: xav...@bachelot.org
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
xav...@bachelot.org
Depends On: 2030278
Blocks: 2028935
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



perl-MIME-Lite-HTML for EPEL 9



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028935
[Bug 2028935] sympa for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030278
[Bug 2030278] Please branch and build perl-MIME-Lite in epel9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037954
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037951] New: perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951

Bug ID: 2037951
   Summary: perl-HTML-Format for EPEL9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-HTML-Format
  Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
  Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: lxt...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040...@freenet.de, rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu,
spo...@gmail.com, xav...@bachelot.org
Blocks: 2028935
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-HTML-Format for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028935
[Bug 2028935] sympa for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037951
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fwd: Python SIG at Fedora Council Video Meeting

[Miro Hrončok]

Hello, does anybody want to take this? If not, I will.

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Python SIG at Fedora Council Video Meeting
Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:06:17 -0500
From:   Tom Callaway 
To: Miro Hrončok 



Miro, I know you're in the Python SIG, please forward this on as needed.

The Fedora Council would like to invite your SIG to present at an upcoming 
Fedora Council video meeting. If you're interested, what we'd be looking for 
from you is:


  * Someone to present (on camera in a virtual meeting room) a 10-15 minute
presentation (with slides) on the state of your SIG (past, present, future)
along with any calls to action that you might have.
  * Stick around for 15+ minutes for Q discussion

These meetings are recorded and then shared on 
youtube:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnIfca4LPFVn8-FjpPVc1ow 



A small FAQ:

Q. When are these meetings held?
A. The video meetings are held monthly, on a Thursday, between 1800 - 1900 UTC.

Q. Do we have to do this?
A. No. It is an opportunity we're making available to you, but if you don't 
want to (or cannot), feel free to decline (or ignore this email).


Q. Would the meeting be all about our SIG?
A. We also use some time to discuss council business, but you'd be the guest(s) 
of honor.


Q. Okay, we're in. How do I sign-up?
A. You reply to this email and say "Our SIG would love to do this!" and I'll 
get you scheduled.


Q. I have other questions, who can I ask?
A. You can ask me! You now have my email, or you can find me any of the other 
obvious places I have presence on the internet and ask me there.


Thanks,
Tom "spot" Callaway, on behalf of the Fedora Council
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037549] Please branch and build perl-PPI-HTML for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037549

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8682c7378f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8682c7378f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037549
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

[Inglis, Malcolm via devel]

Thanks, Fabio!

I'm sorry I missed the process to cut a ticket in packager-sponsors. I've done 
that now: https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/511

That doc page was one of the few I was bouncing around until I opted to email 
this list. That page linked to the repo's README, which then linked "Procedure 
for new packagers" to 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers , which 
linked back to the original doc page. That page had a section on "How to find a 
sponsor", which seemed to imply I'd need to find a sponsor to volunteer 
*before* moving ahead. Meanwhile, I noticed that several 'Self Introduction' 
emails on this list had sought and received sponsorship, so I figured this was 
a way that would work.

It may help if said doc page elaborated the process, perhaps by describing an 
example request, and if the README on `packager-sponsors` was also elaborated 
and updated to not link to dead wikis. I can try to send some PRs to help out 
there.

I understood why `packager` membership is required for various infrastructure 
access; it makes perfect sense to avoid managing 
effectively-free-world-writable storage :) I don't believe I raised any 
contention there. The PR that Maxwell linked seems very appealing, though. It 
would be great if PRs with new sources from non-packager-members could pass CI 
without any action from maintainers.

The problem that Maxwell raised about sources updates is not one that I've 
experienced. I've had a PR with new sources be accepted as-is just fine ( 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-prompt-toolkit/pull-request/1 ). It's 
just that the CI run was failing (as per state of my other outstanding PRs) 
until the maintainer stepped in.

Cheers,
Malcolm

P.S. my apologies for letting my corporate mailserver rules mess up the thread 
subject by adding '[EXTERNAL]'. I'll try to catch that in future.

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 18:27:31 +, "Fabio Valentini"  
wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> Welcome to Fedora! It's great to see more Amazon Linux people joining up. :)
>
> There *is* documentation for how to join the "packager" group, but it
> is sometimes not very discoverable, depending on the exact search
> terms you use ...
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
>
> Making PRs and proving that you have understood the basics of Fedora /
> RPM packaging is a good step towards getting sponsored.
> If you want to go the direct route, you can open a ticket here, where
> you can apply for sponsorship into the packager group directly:
> https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors (don't forget to list your
> contributions to Fedora in the ticket, i.e. accepted PRs, non-binding
> package reviews, etc.)
>
> And, you are right, not being able to upload sources for new versions
> when making a PR is unfortunate. On the other hand, making it possible
> to upload arbitrary files to Fedora servers for "untrusted" users is
> not a good idea either. So we really don't have a good solution for
> that yet ...
> As Maxwell has noted in another reply, you can use a partial
> workaround for this problem - by updating the "sources" and
> ".gitignore" files (running "fedpkg new-sources --offline"). Then a
> packager group member can just upload the actual file(s) to the cache
> and merge the PR - and this then doesn't require any additional
> commits or changes to your PR.
>
> Fabio / decathorpe
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2034405





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034405
[Bug 2034405] perl-Net-Facebook-Oauth2 for EPEL 9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220106.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 99/228 (x86_64), 62/159 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220104.n.0):

ID: 1097320 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097320
ID: 1097439 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097439
ID: 1097440 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097440
ID: 1097469 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097469
ID: 1097480 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097480

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220104.n.0):

ID: 1097237 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097237
ID: 1097248 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097248
ID: 1097254 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097254
ID: 1097260 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097260
ID: 1097278 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097278
ID: 1097280 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097280
ID: 1097293 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097293
ID: 1097294 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097294
ID: 1097297 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097297
ID: 1097298 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097298
ID: 1097321 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097321
ID: 1097322 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097322
ID: 1097327 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097327
ID: 1097341 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097341
ID: 1097376 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097376
ID: 1097379 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097379
ID: 1097393 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097393
ID: 1097405 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097405
ID: 1097444 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097444
ID: 1097455 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097455
ID: 1097457 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097457
ID: 1097466 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097466
ID: 1097496 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097496
ID: 1097738 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097738
ID: 1097739 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097739
ID: 1097740 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097740
ID: 1097741 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097741
ID: 1097742 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097742
ID: 1097743 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097743
ID: 1097769 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097769
ID: 1097770 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097770
ID: 1097771 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097771
ID: 1097772 Test: x86_64 universal 

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Steve Grubb]

Hello,

On Thursday, January 6, 2022 3:23:15 PM EST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > There actually is magic in the kernel that records who sent a signal to
> > > the audit daemon and the  necessary atributes. This functionality has
> > > been there since at least 2005. It's not new.
> > 
> > Right, so is /usr/bin/stop-audit with the following contents the
> > solution:
> > ---
> > #!/bin/sh
> > set -e
> > exec kill $(systemctl show -P MainPID auditd)
> > ---
> > ?

In essense, yeah. But there are a lot more signals than just SIGTERM and as I 
said before, the systemd crowd has done such a good job taking over this 
space that everyone will start asking that this be migrated to systemctl so 
there is one and only one way to do things.

> I do not believe this is currently usable for audit because the
> information on who requested to kill the process is lost this way.
> 
> In terms of audit you can audit that user XYZ ran /usr/bin/stop-audit,
> however the process that actually then kills the audit daemon will not
> have the magic markers in the kernel side and will instead be the
> systemd process.

Yep, that is the crux of the problem.

> This breaks the audit log chain, as there is no way to audit that
> systemd is operating on behalf of that user. The audit trail chain is
> broken by the systemcl -> systemd jump.

This is the two generals problem. (How do you know the message really came 
from the other general when it traveled through hostile territory?)

> This is the problem that need to be solved to get rid of audit's use of
> shell scripts that directly perform operations wrt the kernel.

There have been several proposals. One is that systemctl could check a config 
file and see that it needs to send a signal and which one. Another is systemd 
could look it up in the unit files and answer back that systemctl should send 
a signal instead.

> I wonder if another option is to have the audit code in the kernel
> intercept systemcl messages sent to systemd and interpret the commands
> and log what they are asking ...

That's a new one.  :-)

I'm afraid that would require knowing which sockets are part of the dbus comm 
system and its protocol. Parsing dbus messages in the kernel is not something 
the upstream kernel maintainers will take lightly. I'd expect pushback on 
that.

Cheers,
-Steve

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Chris Murphy]

Could this feature work with 3rd party kernel modules, in a UEFI
Secure Boot (and thus kernel lockdown) context?

Workstation working group is tracking this problem as
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/155

If DIGLIM could be used for this use case, I further wonder whether
it's possible to have multiple signatures for different portions of a
kernel module? The purpose, is so NVIDIA can sign their proprietary
binary blob (because it's theirs, no one else's, and therefore they
should sign it). Next,either (a) Fedora (b) RPM Fusion (c) the user,
can sign the remainder of the kernel module (the parts that are open
source anyway). It's an open question who could or should sign
NVIDIA's key, to narrowly indicate trust. And also a mechanism for
revoking that trust without breaking everything else.

--
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-35-20220106.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20220101.0):

ID: 1097894 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097894
ID: 1097906 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097906
ID: 1097914 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097914

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20220101.0):

ID: 1097900 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097900

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20220101.0):

ID: 1097884 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097884

Passed openQA tests: 12/15 (aarch64), 14/16 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20220101.0):

ID: 1097909 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097909
ID: 1097913 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097913

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.26 to 0.38
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1093928#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1097885#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Simo Sorce]

On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 20:09 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:55:50PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Thursday, January 6, 2022 1:02:36 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 08:48:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > > I know that you said that the scripts are needed because of "magic
> > > > > stuff™" that the scripts do, but sorry, that's not a justification:
> > 
> > It is the justification. The audit system has regulatory requirements 
> > imposed 
> > on it. This is required by common criteria and subsequently depended on for 
> > PCI-DSS, CIS, DISA STIG, NIST risk management framework, and many other 
> > security or regulatory schemes.
> > 
> > 
> > > > > *everything* that can be done using a shell script can also be
> > > > > reimplemented independently. Right now audit pulls in the whole
> > > > > initscripts stack, this should all be replaced by some small helper.
> > 
> > I moved it to initscripts-service in rawhide.
> > 
> > > > > (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell script, or maybe something
> > > > > in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know audit.)> 
> > 
> > It would be better if there was a systemctl solution. Any solution I 
> > implement will be met with you need to migrate to systemctl. There have 
> > been 
> > multiple bz opened and closed on this.
> > 
> > > > As I understand the bug, it's not a question of whether the thing can
> > > > be done, but whether it can be known *who did it*.
> > 
> > Exactly. And "who" means login uid, pid, and their security label. You can 
> > only get this if the signal is sent from the user's context.
> > 
> > > There is no magic functionality in the kernel that specifically records
> > > that something was executed by some specific script.
> > 
> > There actually is magic in the kernel that records who sent a signal to the 
> > audit daemon and the  necessary atributes. This functionality has been 
> > there 
> > since at least 2005. It's not new.
> 
> Right, so is /usr/bin/stop-audit with the following contents the solution:
> ---
> #!/bin/sh
> set -e
> exec kill $(systemctl show -P MainPID auditd)
> ---
> ?

I do not believe this is currently usable for audit because the
information on who requested to kill the process is lost this way.

In terms of audit you can audit that user XYZ ran /usr/bin/stop-audit,
however the process that actually then kills the audit daemon will not
have the magic markers in the kernel side and will instead be the
systemd process.

This breaks the audit log chain, as there is no way to audit that
systemd is operating on behalf of that user. The audit trail chain is
broken by the systemcl -> systemd jump.

This is the problem that need to be solved to get rid of audit's use of
shell scripts that directly perform operations wrt the kernel.

I wonder if another option is to have the audit code in the kernel
intercept systemcl messages sent to systemd and interpret the commands
and log what they are asking ...

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Simo Sorce]

On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 20:01 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:17:01PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 18:02 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 08:48:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I know that you said that the scripts are needed because of "magic 
> > > > > stuff™"
> > > > > that the scripts do, but sorry, that's not a justification: 
> > > > > *everything* that
> > > > > can be done using a shell script can also be reimplemented 
> > > > > independently.
> > > > > Right now audit pulls in the whole initscripts stack, this should all 
> > > > > be replaced
> > > > > by some small helper. (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell 
> > > > > script, or
> > > > > maybe something in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know 
> > > > > audit.)
> > > > 
> > > > As I understand the bug, it's not a question of whether the thing can
> > > > be done, but whether it can be known *who did it*. 
> > > 
> > > There is no magic functionality in the kernel that specifically records 
> > > that
> > > something was executed by some specific script. If that scripts sends a 
> > > signal
> > > somewhere, you can send the same signal with the same sender info and the 
> > > same privileges
> > > using bash/python/C/Rust or even assembly. So the "who did it" information
> > > can be provided in a different way without pulling in the initscripts 
> > > stack,
> > > or it is bogus, or maybe even both.
> > 
> > In this case the "who" is the user, not the script.
> 
> Yes, obviously the user is outside of the machine and "user" always
> means some program running under the UID assigned to the user.
> All I'm trying to say is that if you can make one implementation of this
> program (e.g. a set of bash scripts) send some bit of information, you can
> make another implementation send the same signal.
> 
> > The problem of going through systemctl is that the "who" is lost
> > because all the audit system can see is that systemd started the
> > action. Basically the communication between systemctl and systemd masks
> > the identity of the user that initiated the action.
> 
> Yes, systemctl doesn't save this information. So audit uses some
> alternative command to send this information somewhere. This
> alternative command should just send this bit of information where appropriate
> and then call systemctl. More-or-less as things are now, but without
> the initscripts baggage.

I believe the problem is that it is not just a fire and forget signal,
any kernel syscall can be traced back to that user by this method, so
anything the "scripts" do can be audited.

> > I believe a solution needs to be found between systemd and the audit
> > subsystem in general so that we remove this whole class of issues
> > altogether.
> 
> If there's a need to add something to systemctl or systemd, we can do
> it. But it's never been clearly articulated afaik.

I am afraid the hurdle, so far, is that there is a belief that the only
way to get valid audit logs when systemd-init is involved is to trust
the whole of it, which would require the development of a whole trusted
audit subsystem/hand-off within systemd.

I think that potentially one option would be to provide a kernel audit
API that systemd could be trusted to use to set the user ids so that
the audit subsystem is given those when there is the systemctl ->
systemd hand-off.

But that requires the audit and systemd teams to agree on what that
trust and those controls means, and figure out how to comply to all
regulations in the process of adding this stuff. This is probably no
small feat.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:55:50PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thursday, January 6, 2022 1:02:36 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 08:48:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > I know that you said that the scripts are needed because of "magic
> > > > stuff™" that the scripts do, but sorry, that's not a justification:
> 
> It is the justification. The audit system has regulatory requirements imposed 
> on it. This is required by common criteria and subsequently depended on for 
> PCI-DSS, CIS, DISA STIG, NIST risk management framework, and many other 
> security or regulatory schemes.
> 
> 
> > > > *everything* that can be done using a shell script can also be
> > > > reimplemented independently. Right now audit pulls in the whole
> > > > initscripts stack, this should all be replaced by some small helper.
> 
> I moved it to initscripts-service in rawhide.
> 
> > > > (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell script, or maybe something
> > > > in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know audit.)> 
> 
> It would be better if there was a systemctl solution. Any solution I 
> implement will be met with you need to migrate to systemctl. There have been 
> multiple bz opened and closed on this.
> 
> > > As I understand the bug, it's not a question of whether the thing can
> > > be done, but whether it can be known *who did it*.
> 
> Exactly. And "who" means login uid, pid, and their security label. You can 
> only get this if the signal is sent from the user's context.
> 
> > There is no magic functionality in the kernel that specifically records
> > that something was executed by some specific script.
> 
> There actually is magic in the kernel that records who sent a signal to the 
> audit daemon and the  necessary atributes. This functionality has been there 
> since at least 2005. It's not new.

Right, so is /usr/bin/stop-audit with the following contents the solution:
---
#!/bin/sh
set -e
exec kill $(systemctl show -P MainPID auditd)
---
?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:17:01PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 18:02 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 08:48:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I know that you said that the scripts are needed because of "magic 
> > > > stuff™"
> > > > that the scripts do, but sorry, that's not a justification: 
> > > > *everything* that
> > > > can be done using a shell script can also be reimplemented 
> > > > independently.
> > > > Right now audit pulls in the whole initscripts stack, this should all 
> > > > be replaced
> > > > by some small helper. (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell 
> > > > script, or
> > > > maybe something in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know audit.)
> > > 
> > > As I understand the bug, it's not a question of whether the thing can
> > > be done, but whether it can be known *who did it*. 
> > 
> > There is no magic functionality in the kernel that specifically records that
> > something was executed by some specific script. If that scripts sends a 
> > signal
> > somewhere, you can send the same signal with the same sender info and the 
> > same privileges
> > using bash/python/C/Rust or even assembly. So the "who did it" information
> > can be provided in a different way without pulling in the initscripts stack,
> > or it is bogus, or maybe even both.
> 
> In this case the "who" is the user, not the script.

Yes, obviously the user is outside of the machine and "user" always
means some program running under the UID assigned to the user.
All I'm trying to say is that if you can make one implementation of this
program (e.g. a set of bash scripts) send some bit of information, you can
make another implementation send the same signal.

> The problem of going through systemctl is that the "who" is lost
> because all the audit system can see is that systemd started the
> action. Basically the communication between systemctl and systemd masks
> the identity of the user that initiated the action.

Yes, systemctl doesn't save this information. So audit uses some
alternative command to send this information somewhere. This
alternative command should just send this bit of information where appropriate
and then call systemctl. More-or-less as things are now, but without
the initscripts baggage.

> I believe a solution needs to be found between systemd and the audit
> subsystem in general so that we remove this whole class of issues
> altogether.

If there's a need to add something to systemctl or systemd, we can do
it. But it's never been clearly articulated afaik.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure