[Bug 2213276] perl-Locale-Codes-3.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-9c335d50cf has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-9c335d50cf` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9c335d50cf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213276%23c5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ee729bf9b2 sympa-6.2.72-2.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d55abd83c7 perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06-22.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e14003b86d syncthing-1.23.5-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing castxml-0.6.1-2.el8 perl-Class-Measure-0.10-1.el8 perl-GIS-Distance-0.20-1.el8 perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.16-1.el8 Details about builds: castxml-0.6.1-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-663f2d4abc) C-family abstract syntax tree XML output tool Update Information: Rebuild for updated llvm/clang ChangeLog: * Thu Jun 8 2023 Mattias Ellert - 0.6.1-2 - Rebuild for llvm/clang 16 (Fedora 38/39) - Rebuild for llvm/clang 15 (EPEL 8/9) References: [ 1 ] Bug #2213223 - Can no longer be installed on EL 9.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213223 perl-Class-Measure-0.10-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6d1a89529e) Create, compare and convert units of measurement Update Information: This release fixes unintented modification of source objects. ChangeLog: * Thu Jun 8 2023 Petr Pisar - 0.10-1 - 0.10 bump - Package the tests * Mon Feb 1 2021 Petr Pisar - 0.09-1 - 0.09 bump References: [ 1 ] Bug #2213318 - perl-Class-Measure-0.10 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213318 perl-GIS-Distance-0.20-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-242326c70a) Calculate geographic distances Update Information: This release imroves a documentation. ChangeLog: * Thu Jun 8 2023 Petr Pisar - 0.20-1 - 0.20 bump * Tue Jan 18 2022 Petr Pisar - 0.19-2 - Package the tests References: [ 1 ] Bug #2213337 - perl-GIS-Distance-0.20 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213337 perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.16-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ef2823c5a) C implementation of GIS::Distance formulas Update Information: This release updates a documentation. ChangeLog: * Thu Jun 8 2023 Petr Pisar - 0.16-1 - 0.16 bump * Tue Jan 18 2022 Petr Pisar - 0.15-2 - Package the tests References: [ 1 ] Bug #2213316 - perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.16 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213316 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2208970] perl-pmtools-2.2.0-17.fc39 FTBFS: t/pmcat.t test fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208970 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-pmtools-2.2.0-18.fc39 |perl-pmtools-2.2.0-18.fc39 ||perl-pmtools-2.2.0-18.fc38 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-06-09 01:59:59 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e84a5d7bf0 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208970 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202208970%23c5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213276] perl-Locale-Codes-3.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-380339f54a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-380339f54a` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-380339f54a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213276%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213677] New: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.005 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213677 Bug ID: 2213677 Summary: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.005 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-Dispatchouli Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.005 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.005 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.004-1.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Dispatchouli Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7173/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatchouli -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213677 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213677%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Kernel Bug Reports: Template broken?
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Christopher Klooz wrote: > Hi, > > I saw that some users filed kernel bug reports, which lacked information. > Then I wanted to check the kernel bug report template and found out: there > is no longer a template. > > So in the past, once the component "kernel" was chosen, the user was > provided with a template of the bug report, which informed them about what > they should provide (e.g., dmesg). > > Is it intended that there is no longer a template or is it broken for some > reason? It's likely broken by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931587 (the new guided bug form for fedora). Can you file a bug like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189110 to ask that it be added back? Or I can if you prefer... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Requesting an addition to the install image
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 12:56:03PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > I'll submit a PR. We already include it in the rhel9-branch so I don't have a problem adding it in rawhide. nvme seems to have become fairly popular so we should at least include the basic tools :) It looks like it amounts to these 2 commits: f031f2850b3823fca0360ee9668702ab4139ec5f to add nvme-cli 0099d618be177325487d2c23ec2d8a765d03ba1d to remove machine specific files Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Missing features...
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:54:14AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/8/23 00:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:43:50AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 6/7/23 06:59, Adam Ł. wrote: > > > > What about missing feature ? > > > > > > Feature requests go to the upstream issue tracker. > > > > It's spam - best to ignore, and hopefully the list maintainers > > can delete the account. > > I don't actually think it's spam, just a misunderstanding of how things > work. He initially posted the question under the libreoffice SIG thread. Yeah, I too thought it was spam at first, but I think they are just asking for libreoffice features similar to some pointpoint ones. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Strange failure, unpackaged files.
I have solved it with this https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mint-themes/c/85835bb3515a68babd4795cd34585ab6aaf8ff11?branch=rawhide ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Strange failure, unpackaged files.
It builds fine for f39 and f38 local builds, it fails for f38 koji and copr builders. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101949820 Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Aqua/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Blue/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Brown/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Grey/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Orange/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Pink/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Purple/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Red/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Sand/index.theme /usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Teal/index.theme Child return code was: 1 This line in %files should cover it. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mint-themes/blob/rawhide/f/mint-themes.spec#_76 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Requesting an addition to the install image
Once upon a time, Tomasz Torcz said: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:37:47AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Where is the proper place to request something be added to the install > > image? I was going to file a BZ but wasn't sure of the proper > > component. > > > > I'd like to see nvme-cli (and libnvme, which it depends on) added to the > > install image. I wanted to switch an NVMe drive to 4K sectors, which > > reformats it, so I needed to do that before installing Fedora (or have > > to install, change, then reinstall). It would be much more convenient > > to be able to boot into rescue mode to do this. > > I believe you can use DNF on install media to install missing packages. That's not available on an install image. dnf is there, but the RPM database is not. -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora Copr builders updated to Fedora 38
RPM Sequoia's crypto policies can be configured, so you should be able to re-enable SHA-1. However, this would be a global change, not only for EL6... See https://docs.rs/sequoia-policy-config/latest/sequoia_policy_config/#hash-functions Cheers, Ondřej On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hello maintainers! > > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders > might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they > work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is passing just fine, so > you _should_ be fine too :-). Please let us know if you have some > troubles. > > There was one important change in Fedora 38 - RPM switched to the > Sequoia crypto backend. It refuses SHA-1 in crypto; which basically > disallows Mock to properly check EL6 GPG signatures. To allow further > builds, we switched to gpgcheck=0 for all epel-6 chroots. If you know a > better work-around, let me know. > > Pavel > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Kernel Bug Reports: Template broken?
Hi, I saw that some users filed kernel bug reports, which lacked information. Then I wanted to check the kernel bug report template and found out: there is no longer a template. So in the past, once the component "kernel" was chosen, the user was provided with a template of the bug report, which informed them about what they should provide (e.g., dmesg). Is it intended that there is no longer a template or is it broken for some reason? Chris ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Requesting an addition to the install image
On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 20:36 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:37:47AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Where is the proper place to request something be added to the install > > image? I was going to file a BZ but wasn't sure of the proper > > component. > > > > I'd like to see nvme-cli (and libnvme, which it depends on) added to the > > install image. I wanted to switch an NVMe drive to 4K sectors, which > > reformats it, so I needed to do that before installing Fedora (or have > > to install, change, then reinstall). It would be much more convenient > > to be able to boot into rescue mode to do this. > > I believe you can use DNF on install media to install missing packages. Live images, yes, but I don't think you can on the installer images, I think the RPM database is actually stripped from them so deps won't appear to be present. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Requesting an addition to the install image
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:37:47AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Where is the proper place to request something be added to the install > image? I was going to file a BZ but wasn't sure of the proper > component. > > I'd like to see nvme-cli (and libnvme, which it depends on) added to the > install image. I wanted to switch an NVMe drive to 4K sectors, which > reformats it, so I needed to do that before installing Fedora (or have > to install, change, then reinstall). It would be much more convenient > to be able to boot into rescue mode to do this. I believe you can use DNF on install media to install missing packages. -- Tomasz Torcz “(…) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.” to...@pipebreaker.pl — Mitchell Blank on LKML ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Requesting an addition to the install image
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 11:37 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Where is the proper place to request something be added to the install > > image? I was going to file a BZ but wasn't sure of the proper > > component. > > > > I'd like to see nvme-cli (and libnvme, which it depends on) added to the > > install image. I wanted to switch an NVMe drive to 4K sectors, which > > reformats it, so I needed to do that before installing Fedora (or have > > to install, change, then reinstall). It would be much more convenient > > to be able to boot into rescue mode to do this. > > lorax, but we do try to keep the installer environment as minimal as > possible. Technically the change is quite easy, you could submit it as > a PR - you just have to edit > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/blob/master/share/templates.d/99-generic/runtime-install.tmpl > , that is the recipe for creating the installer environment. I understand and support limiting what's added, but I think this should be there given the "can't do this thing after install" effect. The flip side is there are some things that are probably obsolete, like I can't remember the last time I used a tape drive or PCMCIA card or even drive that needed hdparm (but I know that always can devolve into arguments rapidly). :) I'll submit a PR. -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Missing features...
On 6/8/23 00:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:43:50AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/7/23 06:59, Adam Ł. wrote: What about missing feature ? Feature requests go to the upstream issue tracker. It's spam - best to ignore, and hopefully the list maintainers can delete the account. I don't actually think it's spam, just a misunderstanding of how things work. He initially posted the question under the libreoffice SIG thread. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
Hi, Not an expert, just a casual Urdu speaker with a drive by contribution. I don't write Urdu much these days but I can read it. Akira TAGOH writes: > I have no idea if Noto Sans Arabic or Noto Naskh Arabic is qualified > for Urdu and Punjabi. Even though they have minimal coverage in > fontconfig perspective, there might be minor differences which look > strange for native speakers like punctuation marks in CJK etc. I looked through the Urdu bits using https://fonts.google.com/noto/specimen/Noto+Naskh+Arabic and things generally look okay. All the letters used in Urdu (~40, which is more than ~30 used in Arabic) seem to be present. The text is legible and readable. I tried a few punctuation marks and they are getting rendered in a way I can read it. > If we are going to change, we need feedback then. > For the last resort, I could take them over temporarily though, we > definitely need some help from Urdu/Punjabi communities. I am not part of these communities, maybe I should join? Omair -- PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108 E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Requesting an addition to the install image
On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 11:37 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Where is the proper place to request something be added to the install > image? I was going to file a BZ but wasn't sure of the proper > component. > > I'd like to see nvme-cli (and libnvme, which it depends on) added to the > install image. I wanted to switch an NVMe drive to 4K sectors, which > reformats it, so I needed to do that before installing Fedora (or have > to install, change, then reinstall). It would be much more convenient > to be able to boot into rescue mode to do this. lorax, but we do try to keep the installer environment as minimal as possible. Technically the change is quite easy, you could submit it as a PR - you just have to edit https://github.com/weldr/lorax/blob/master/share/templates.d/99-generic/runtime-install.tmpl , that is the recipe for creating the installer environment. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Parallel-ForkManager] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
tibbs merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Parallel-ForkManager` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Parallel-ForkManager/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Requesting an addition to the install image
Where is the proper place to request something be added to the install image? I was going to file a BZ but wasn't sure of the proper component. I'd like to see nvme-cli (and libnvme, which it depends on) added to the install image. I wanted to switch an NVMe drive to 4K sectors, which reformats it, so I needed to do that before installing Fedora (or have to install, change, then reinstall). It would be much more convenient to be able to boot into rescue mode to do this. -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
Actually nafees-naskh-fonts would need some font config to become default. So I guess the easiest thing is indeed to unretire the old default package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:16 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 07/06/23 21:10, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 14:55 -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: > >> On 6/7/23 13:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > >> Once upon a time, Clement Verna said: > >>> Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 > >>> merges, > >>> the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :-) > >> So... if it takes a manual process (including opening a PR), does it > >> really make sense to put Rawhide images on Dockerhub? > > Sadly, lots of people look there, but yeah... it's not great. > Yeah, basically, because $VISIBILITY. Anyway this looks like something > that could be easily automated via GH Actions. > >>> Any automation there would probibly need buy-in from docker folks, > >>> because if we filed a automated PR every day and a docker human had to > >>> review/merge it, they might not think thats a good way to spend their > >>> time. > >>> > >>> kevin > >>> > >> If people would just use Podman they would not have this issue. > >> > > The Bodhi CI (one of the affected cases) seems to actually support both > > docker and podman, but default to docker. Not sure why, I guess Mattia > > could say. > > No idea... the CI stuff was present before I started messing with Bodhi. > I think it was set up by CPE folks. > > But... how does using podman would overcome the issue? As far as I know, > `docker` command in fedora is just a wrapper which runs podman. Doesn't > podman uses the same dockerfiles? Or maybe podman understands the 'FROM > fedora:rawhide' differently than docker (doesn't point to docker hub as > default)? > "fedora:rawhide" on Podman is aliased to registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
I suggest we can go with nafees-naskh-fonts for now. Though we should have caught some of the paktype fonts anyway. :-( ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?
Il 07/06/23 21:10, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 14:55 -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: >> On 6/7/23 13:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Clement Verna said: >>> Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 >>> merges, >>> the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :-) >> So... if it takes a manual process (including opening a PR), does it >> really make sense to put Rawhide images on Dockerhub? > Sadly, lots of people look there, but yeah... it's not great. Yeah, basically, because $VISIBILITY. Anyway this looks like something that could be easily automated via GH Actions. >>> Any automation there would probibly need buy-in from docker folks, >>> because if we filed a automated PR every day and a docker human had to >>> review/merge it, they might not think thats a good way to spend their >>> time. >>> >>> kevin >>> >> If people would just use Podman they would not have this issue. >> > The Bodhi CI (one of the affected cases) seems to actually support both > docker and podman, but default to docker. Not sure why, I guess Mattia > could say. No idea... the CI stuff was present before I started messing with Bodhi. I think it was set up by CPE folks. But... how does using podman would overcome the issue? As far as I know, `docker` command in fedora is just a wrapper which runs podman. Doesn't podman uses the same dockerfiles? Or maybe podman understands the 'FROM fedora:rawhide' differently than docker (doesn't point to docker hub as default)? Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora Copr builders updated to Fedora 38
Hello maintainers! Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is passing just fine, so you _should_ be fine too :-). Please let us know if you have some troubles. There was one important change in Fedora 38 - RPM switched to the Sequoia crypto backend. It refuses SHA-1 in crypto; which basically disallows Mock to properly check EL6 GPG signatures. To allow further builds, we switched to gpgcheck=0 for all epel-6 chroots. If you know a better work-around, let me know. Pavel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: LibreOffice packages
Michael Catanzaro píše v St 07. 06. 2023 v 08:15 -0500: > > Ideally all bundled dependencies should be hooked up to some sort of > automation that notices when there are upstream updates available, > comparable to upstream release monitoring. On Flathub this is done by > flathub-external-data-checker [1], but using it is optional and it's > not useful if it's not used. For Fedora Flatpaks, I don't think any > comparable mechanism exists, but it should be as simple as "update > whenever any component RPM is updated." > > [1] https://github.com/flathub/flatpak-external-data-checker > I used that for flatpaks I maintain for a while, but then removed it because it was rather adding work than reducing it. But it could be just my workflow. I recommend anyone use https://release-monitoring.org/ which can send you notifications of new versions of specified projects. Could be used for any component maintenance including RPMs. I get notified and then it's up to me when and how I act on it. You can build automation based on it, too. My biggest flatpak has 15 modules. Maybe if it had dozens like LibreOffice I'd appreciate more automation. Jiri > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213276] perl-Locale-Codes-3.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-9c335d50cf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9c335d50cf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213276%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
pghmcfc pushed to rpms/perl-MCE-Shared (rawhide). "Update to 1.884 (..more)"
Notification time stamped 2023-06-08 13:20:28 UTC
From 1d6a53e15a332e9e2731822cfdb41766f1c7c982 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Jun 08 2023 13:19:48 +
Subject: Update to 1.884
- New upstream release 1.884
- Add missing return statement(s) in Condvar and Queue
- Move tests for condvar timedwait to xt/condvar_timedwait.t
---
diff --git a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
index e65b6ab..111ec6a 100644
--- a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
+++ b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-MCE-Shared
-Version: 1.883
+Version: 1.884
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes
License: GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(MCE::Flow)
BuildRequires: perl(open)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) >= 0.88
BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
-# Runtime
+# Dependencies
Requires: perl(IO::FDPass) >= 1.2
Requires: perl(MCE) >= 1.886
Requires: perl(overloading)
@@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Server.3*
%changelog
+* Thu Jun 8 2023 Paul Howarth - 1.884-1
+- Update to 1.884
+ - Add missing return statement(s) in Condvar and Queue
+ - Move tests for condvar timedwait to xt/condvar_timedwait.t
+
* Wed Jun 7 2023 Paul Howarth - 1.883-1
- Update to 1.883
- Bump MCE dependency to 1.886
@@ -110,7 +115,7 @@ make test
* Wed Jan 4 2023 Paul Howarth - 1.880-1
- Update to 1.880
- Bump MCE dependency to 1.883
- - Improve 05_mce_hobo.t test
+ - Improved 05_mce_hobo.t test
* Sat Dec 3 2022 Paul Howarth - 1.879-1
- Update to 1.879
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 5df9a35..722eff4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (MCE-Shared-1.883.tar.gz) =
ea9f6ab679347ad6142782edc8d6a4ea17a63225f066bda6118a2e0d1384df2fe163af0e3a19d8e706b4b9a4f8b81243d9ad84bb872738d1711215572769a0d7
+SHA512 (MCE-Shared-1.884.tar.gz) =
b05a7d3a3b4de4b8693db123e35adcb360e312649c054e8bef94f1ad3cfb4c499fbe1228b4d6782a21323a37120a18ce46188ba5857f66f61e3f1be9ffe0fb5b
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MCE-Shared/c/1d6a53e15a332e9e2731822cfdb41766f1c7c982?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213276] perl-Locale-Codes-3.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-380339f54a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-380339f54a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213276%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to fix the "rpma.src: W: strange-permission rpma.spec 600" warning?
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:33 PM Tim Flink wrote: > > On 5/25/23 09:56, Xiao Yang wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I try to create rpma source package on fedora by fedpkg --release rawhide > > mockbuild. > > The permissions of original rpma.spec is 0644: > > $ ll rpma.spec > > -rw-r--r--. 1 mockbuild mock 2107 May 25 17:31 rpma.spec > > > > The permissions of rpma.spec in the generated rpma source package is > > changed to 0600 and then the following warning is triggered by fedpkg > > --release rawhide lint. > > $ fedpkg --release rawhide lint > > Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl > > Failed to get ns from Git url or pushurl > > Mockbuild results directory found. Linting mockbuild results. > > rpmlint session starts > > rpmlint: 2.4.0 > > configuration: > > /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml > > /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml > > /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml > > /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml > > /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml > > /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml > > /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml > > checks: 31, packages: 4 > > > > rpma.src: W: strange-permission rpma.spec 600 > > 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has > > taken 0.3 s > > > > Could you tell me how to fix the warning? > > > > Best Regards, > > Xiao Yang > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > > I don't know if you found a solution to this but I figured that I would post > what I ended up doing after hitting the same problem, assuming that you're > also using rpmautospec. > > The root of this is that rpmautospec/rpkg use python's tempdir in their > process of rendering the actual spec file. On my system, at least, /tmp has > 600 permissions so the rendered file inherits those permissions and is just > copied after rendering, making it into the srpm without a permission change. > > I assume that the koji builders don't have the same setup and thus avoid the > rpmlint warnings for official builds. > > I fixed the problem for my local build by generating the srpm outside fedpkg: > > $ mkdir build > $ rpmautospec process-distgit mypackage.spec build/mypackage.spec > $ chmod 644 build/mypackage.spec > $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --buildsrpm --spec build/mypackage.spec > --sources . > $ cp /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.src.rpm . > > I'm a little unclear on whether this needs to be fixed or not if it only > affects local mockbuilds or if there are better workarounds. If there's a > better solution for this other than going back to generating the changelog > and release by hand, I'm all ears Well, if this is caused by rpmautospec producing a file with unusual permissions ... It should be possible to retain the mode of the original spec file somehow, and I'd report this as an RFE here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173868] Upgrade perl-OLE-Storage_Lite to 0.22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173868 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-OLE-Storage_Lite-0.22- ||1.fc39 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-06-08 11:49:31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173868 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2154400] Upgrade perl-Geo-Inverse to 0.07
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154400 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Geo-Inverse-0.07-1.fc3 ||9 Last Closed||2023-06-08 11:14:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154400 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
I have no idea if Noto Sans Arabic or Noto Naskh Arabic is qualified for Urdu and Punjabi. Even though they have minimal coverage in fontconfig perspective, there might be minor differences which look strange for native speakers like punctuation marks in CJK etc. If we are going to change, we need feedback then. For the last resort, I could take them over temporarily though, we definitely need some help from Urdu/Punjabi communities. On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:09 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts orphan, vishalvvr2 > > > weeks ago > > > > So this one is a problem: it appears to be our intended default font > > for Arabic. It's part of the @fonts group in comps and it's also in the > > lorax templates (meaning we expect to need it in the installer > > environment): > > > > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/blob/master/share/templates.d/99-generic/runtime-install.tmpl#L164 > > > > This git its deadline and got retired yesterday, and that is causing > > the Rawhide compose to fail at the moment: > > > > https://stg.pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/2430 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101913117 > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3117/101913117/root.log > > > > DEBUG util.py:444: 2023-06-07 17:38:15,841: installpkg > > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts failed: no package matched: > > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts > > DEBUG util.py:444: 2023-06-07 17:38:15,842: template command error in > > runtime-install.tmpl: > > DEBUG util.py:444: 2023-06-07 17:38:15,842: installpkg > > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts > > DEBUG util.py:444: 2023-06-07 17:38:15,842: RuntimeError: Required > > installpkg failed. > > > > We need someone to pick up and unretire this package, or we need to > > designate another font that's still maintained as our default Arabic > > font, or, uh, we need to drop Arabic support from the installer, I > > guess... > > Looking into it further, per > https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/status/current.html , it's not > intended to be our default font for Arabic any more, but it *is* the > intended default for Urdu and Punjabi (sans). For the installer at > least we may be able to get away with dropping it and hoping the noto > fonts we install: > > installpkg google-noto-sans-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts > installpkg google-noto-sans-arabic-vf-fonts > installpkg google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts > installpkg google-noto-sans-ethiopic-vf-fonts > google-noto-sans-georgian-vf-fonts > installpkg google-noto-sans-gurmukhi-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-hebrew-vf-fonts > installpkg google-noto-sans-khmer-vf-fonts > installpkg google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts google-noto-sans-thai-vf-fonts > > provide sufficient coverage. CCing Akira Tagoh too. Also following up > at https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/5031 (the Rawhide > failed compose issue). > -- > Adam Williamson (he/him/his) > Fedora QA > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > > -- Akira TAGOH ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #27: 3.74 bump
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.74 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/27 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #26: 3.74 bump
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.74 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/26 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #25: 3.74 bump
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.74 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/25 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #27: 3.74 bump
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following: `` 3.74 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/27 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #26: 3.74 bump
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following: `` 3.74 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/26 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #25: 3.74 bump
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following: `` 3.74 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/25 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213276] perl-Locale-Codes-3.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Changes: 3.74 2023-06-07 sbeck - NEW CODE(s) For Fedora 37,38 and rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213276 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213276%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2154399] Upgrade perl-Geo-Forward to 0.16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154399 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154399 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2154399] Upgrade perl-Geo-Forward to 0.16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154399 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Geo-Forward-0.16-1.fc3 ||9 Last Closed||2023-06-08 10:38:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154399 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2140555] Upgrade perl-Geo-Functions to 0.08
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140555 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140555 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2140555] Upgrade perl-Geo-Functions to 0.08
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140555 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Geo-Functions-0.08-1.f ||c39 Last Closed||2023-06-08 10:07:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140555 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-FCGI] PR #2: Conditionalize client tests
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Conditionalize client tests` that you are following: `` > FCGI::Client is not a low-cost test dependency though You are right. In this case, we need to rewrite the testing of FCGI::Client. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FCGI/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
Hi Adam, On Wednesday, 2023-06-07 13:57:44 -, Adam Ł. wrote: > What ( and eventually where post this message ) about missing feature in > LibreOffic3 ? > (transulcent/transparent groups and interesecion 2d object/text top of video) > https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share_medium=member_desktop As all requests for enhancements (RFE), in the upstream's bug tracker: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/ with the Importance Severity set to 'enhancement'. Eike -- GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Date-Manip] PR #2: Enable rebase pull request filing for upstream releases.
adelton opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Date-Manip` that you are following: `` Enable rebase pull request filing for upstream releases. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Date-Manip/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2139135] Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-Encodings to 1.317
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139135 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-Email-MIME-Encodings-1 ||.317-1.fc39 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-06-08 08:31:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139135 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2139134] Upgrade perl-Email-MessageID to 1.408
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139134 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Email-MessageID-1.408- ||1.fc39 Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com Last Closed||2023-06-08 07:58:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139134 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213444] perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.23-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101929966 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213444%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213444] perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1969668 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1969668=edit Update to 0.23 (#2213444) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213444%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2213444] New: perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444 Bug ID: 2213444 Summary: perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.23 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBIx-RunSQL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: de...@fateyev.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: de...@fateyev.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.23 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.23 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.22-6.fc38 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-RunSQL/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6560/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBIx-RunSQL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213444%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Missing features...
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:43:50AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/7/23 06:59, Adam Ł. wrote: > >What about missing feature ? > > Feature requests go to the upstream issue tracker. It's spam - best to ignore, and hopefully the list maintainers can delete the account. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2105300] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.33 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105300 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|wjhns...@hardakers.net |jples...@redhat.com CC||jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.33 ||-1.fc39 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-06-08 07:04:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105300 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
