Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)
I haven't read the whole thread but I cannot believe everybody just went with it. What is the practical purpose of changing master to main? I see no benefit whatsoever. We're only making this politicized. I haven't checked the tickets but I'd bet my left arm on us not having a single ticket from an individual telling us they were discouraged to participate in any of our projects due to our use of "master" in git. This, for me, is beyond ridiculous but, even more incredible that nobody dared to lift their arm against it. This isn't helping anyone. It's just succumbing to political pressure. And here I was thinking that people here wouldn't have it. I, for one, totally disagree with this change. Especially for the reasons it's being done. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:29 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > I agree that's a challenge. Any ideas for how to address it and change these > perceptions? My 1.5 broken-cryptocurrency cents on this one. I think we should make a serious and great effort to put the users first remind us of this in every breaking decision we make. For example, in Fedora 31, we don't have docker out of the box; though, podman is awesome. This is a good example of how we ask that users align into, often awesome, new technology paradigms, but it breaks user's environments and it takes more work to make Fedora your main OS. This is why we have, in every release, so many articles and scripts that "fix" Fedora, so that the user doesn't have to. Making sure we don't break the user's experience is key, IMHO. Making sure that software doesn't break is key as well. Things should just work. Also, we should through some configuration help there as well; not provide stuff as vanilla as we have for years. For example, just recently, the nginx configuration took into account php-fpm (as an example that comes to mind). For several releases, one had to do this manually. We should provide an environment that welcomes 3rd parties. We want companies to make Fedora their go-to distro. Wouldn't be awesome that docker showed examples of how to do stuff in Fedora first; rather than Ubuntu? Same goes for k8s, raspberry pi, Bring the companies and the companies will bring the users. That's what I can think of right now, hehe. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Tengine: review request hanging
Hello! This review request is pending. I'd like to know if anyone is interested in reviewing it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150393 -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Retiring package: Synapse
Hello, Dear Fedorian Community, I am to retire Synapse from the Fedora repos. The reason is clearly stated here: https://answers.launchpad.net/synapse-project/+question/246635#yui_3_10_3_1_1403917606540_250 If anybody has any last words, they're welcome. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Review request:
Dudes, I need help from a PHP packager if possible! ;) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977208 -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > So IMO I think now that we can accept different database tools into > repo,it's available for us to include mariadb.Official says they will try to > become a independent software but not a mod based on MySQL... > > Maybe easy for review? I don't know exactly... Thank you for that. I will try to contact upstream today in order to seek guidance for the future and present. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I just found this. > > https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1000-changelog Nice find. Are you suggesting anything? -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875150 Spec URL: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mariadb.spec SRPM URL: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))
I think we could, just for fun if you like, pursue making a good plan of how the transition would be and what changes should be done. Consider it objectively. What changes would have to be done the OS? What changes in infrastructure? What tools do we need? This could be a good exercise. The wiki might be a nice place to do it. How about that? As a sysadmin, I'd love to be able to update to a certain point in time. Like in git, you can just checkout a tag... Wouldn't it be awesome to be able to update to a certain tag? Heh, one could even have spin tags, hehe. Also, having the package manager give you warnings, pointers, suggestions and general messages would rock. I'm just sayin' ;) -- Renich Bon Ciric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Unkown Horizons: Does anybody want to comaintain?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Simon Wesp wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Sven Lankes wrote: > SL> Fife is already in Fedora! > > Am Sonntag, 28 Oktober 2012 14:29:23 schrieb Renich Bon Ciric: > RBC> Yeah, not the latest... check the versions of my spec vs current > RBC> one. > > Who cares about your package on your fedora share? I mean, it doesn't > make sense to create your own package, because there is still a > package on fedora which needs some 'love'. > Maybe it's a better strategy to include python-enet, become a > maintainer for fife and update it to newest version and adapt it to be > compatible with UH. Then you can inculde UH to fedora... and badaboom.. > UH will be avaible (with all deps, of course) for all fedora users. This > should be the goal of your packaging, this is why we are all here, this > is the sense of this community. And after this, you will be the hero of > all UH-gamers on fedora! Be honest, you want to be a hero! :-) > > User: renich, Name: Renich Bon Ciric, email: ren...@woralelandia.com > Approved Groups: cla_done ambassadors packager fedorabugs cla_fpca > > You are a packager, you _can_ do it. You know the nike slogan? > Just do it! LOL; yeah, I can do it, I know. In fact, I packaged my own just to offer some help to the actual maintainer. He/She might not need it anyway. If there is no maintainer, I can do it, I think. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Unkown Horizons: Does anybody want to comaintain?
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > That contributor looks to have (temporarily?) left Fedora; if you want > to go ahead and submit a review request, I'd be happy to review. Awesome. Let me do some checks on that review already and do some reviewing of my own. I'll let you know when I post my review request. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things > require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and > mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the fork renaming its stuff? If the > idea is to be a 100% compatible drop-in replacement, then Fedora needs to > make a choice whether to ship Oracle's MySQL or MariaDB and then stick to > it. Keeping it simple and objective, IMHO, MariaDB is the natural choice. It has a community, it's GPL and it's not Oracle... Besides, it is faster and nicer (It has some cool engines). But that is just my opinion. Where should we take this to? Who can be an appropriate advocate for MariaDB? -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Unkown Horizons: Does anybody want to comaintain?
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Sven Lankes wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:43:01PM -0600, Renich Bon Ciric wrote: > >> # Main >> http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/unknown-horizons.spec >> # Deps >> http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/fife.spec > > Fife is already in Fedora! Yeah, not the latest... check the versions of my spec vs current one. >> http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-enet.spec >> I think the specs are ready. Does anybody want to co-maintain this game? > > Please make sure to look at the "old" review request. > This is the one for unknown horizons (which never got finished): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430 Ah, thank you for this! ;) -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Sven Lankes wrote: > Hi, > >> I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora. > > I've promised monty to get going with packaging MariaDB and I did > create some local test packages which do work still need quite a > few changes. I got busy with $dayjob for a while but I'm still > eager to help move mariadb forward - so count me in. Awesome! Thanks! ;=) >> Is there anyone who wants to co-maintain? > > I'm interested in helping there. Ok. >> This is just me wanting to post it for a package review. > > The package review is probably going to be long and hard ;) - > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages > which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to > be interesting. Yeah, I know. Let's see what comes out of this. I found this along the way: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753543 I don't know much about the "Alternatives" ... need to read a bit about it. Anyway, I'd like to start from the bottom. Then, there're the tons of patches done to mysql; which I think we should drop for now and apply only if utterly necessary. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
MariaDB: Packagers needed
Hello, I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora. Is there anyone who wants to co-maintain? This is just me wanting to post it for a package review. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Unkown Horizons: Does anybody want to comaintain?
Hey guys, # ## SPECS # Main http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/unknown-horizons.spec # Deps http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/fife.spec http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-enet.spec I think the specs are ready. Does anybody want to co-maintain this game? Currently, it builds and it works. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
XtreemFS on Fedora
Hello guys! I'm interested in packaging XtreemFS for Fedora. They're BSD and the project pretty good; even if it's java-based; it works fine with openjdk. It's a EU project, it seems. I'm not proficient in java but I have been using this one and know it well. And, besides, the developers are very friendly and all. They, also, have RPMs for F16: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/xtreemfs/Fedora_16/ I'd love it if somebody proficient in java would join to help co-maintain. I sent an email just like this one to the java-devel list. Please, forgive the repost. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/ http://www.introbella.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
