Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-05-27 Thread Paul Wouters 

On Mon, 27 May 2013, Adam Williamson wrote:


What freeze are you referring to? I believe the Beta freeze has now been
lifted, and Final freeze will not hit until 06-18. I think you could
happily submit libreswan-3.3-1.fc19 to updates-testing and eventually to
stable right now with no special permissions or privileges.


Time flies, when you're working in bugzilla.

Thanks, I just pushed the update that had been in f19 testing to stable.

Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-05-27 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 12:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:19:43
> > From: Bill Nottingham 
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
> > 
> > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
> 
> > Package openswan (orphan)
> 
> > Removing: openswan
> >NetworkManager-l2tp requires openswan = 2.6.38-11.fc19
> >NetworkManager-openswan requires openswan = 2.6.38-11.fc19
> 
> openswan is deprecated by libreswan in rawhide and Fedora 18.
> 
> Due to some timing between migration, testing and CVE releases, I was
> not able to get the libreswan package in f19 before the freeze. But I
> can also no longer build openswan packages because it has been obsoleted:
> in rawhide/f18.
> 
> I guess I should request releng/fesco for an exception to get it into
> f19 despite the freeze? The libreswan-3.3-1.fc19 build already exists.

What freeze are you referring to? I believe the Beta freeze has now been
lifted, and Final freeze will not hit until 06-18. I think you could
happily submit libreswan-3.3-1.fc19 to updates-testing and eventually to
stable right now with no special permissions or privileges.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-05-26 Thread Sérgio Basto 
On Dom, 2013-05-26 at 12:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: 
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:19:43
> > From: Bill Nottingham 
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19
> > 
> > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
> 
> > Package openswan (orphan)
> 
> > Removing: openswan
> >NetworkManager-l2tp requires openswan = 2.6.38-11.fc19
> >NetworkManager-openswan requires openswan = 2.6.38-11.fc19
> 
> openswan is deprecated by libreswan in rawhide and Fedora 18.
> 
> Due to some timing between migration, testing and CVE releases, I was
> not able to get the libreswan package in f19 before the freeze. But I
> can also no longer build openswan packages because it has been obsoleted:
> in rawhide/f18.
> 
> I guess I should request releng/fesco for an exception to get it into
> f19 despite the freeze? The libreswan-3.3-1.fc19 build already exists.
> 
> The NM packages should then be rebuild/renamed to depend on libreswan,
> and should work without other modifications.

To NM packages rebuild whatever , we need file a bugzilla report that
will be address to package owners.   

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-05-26 Thread Paul Wouters 

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote:


Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:19:43
From: Bill Nottingham 
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.



Package openswan (orphan)



Removing: openswan
   NetworkManager-l2tp requires openswan = 2.6.38-11.fc19
   NetworkManager-openswan requires openswan = 2.6.38-11.fc19


openswan is deprecated by libreswan in rawhide and Fedora 18.

Due to some timing between migration, testing and CVE releases, I was
not able to get the libreswan package in f19 before the freeze. But I
can also no longer build openswan packages because it has been obsoleted:
in rawhide/f18.

I guess I should request releng/fesco for an exception to get it into
f19 despite the freeze? The libreswan-3.3-1.fc19 build already exists.

The NM packages should then be rebuild/renamed to depend on libreswan,
and should work without other modifications.

Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-11 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> Dan Mashal wrote:
>> Looking at updating to libnotify 0.80 as well.
>
> The latest upstream[1] is 0.7.5. Where is this 0.80?
>
> [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/libnotify
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Nevermind.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905120

Confused me.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-11 Thread Michael Cronenworth 
Dan Mashal wrote:
> Looking at updating to libnotify 0.80 as well.

The latest upstream[1] is 0.7.5. Where is this 0.80?

[1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/libnotify
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-11 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Kevin Kofler  wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I
>> don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really
>> any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to
>> own it for my aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned
>> because I don't want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies
>> in Fedora, and I think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.
>
> libindicator is a dependency of libappindicator, which is very much useful
> if you want a GTK+ app to integrate properly in KDE Plasma by supporting the
> current system tray spec rather than the obsolete XEmbed-based one GTK+
> itself implements. Sadly, the affected GTK+ apps in Fedora aren't using this
> because their Fedora maintainers are also upstream GNOME maintainers who
> hate the library.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

MATE team switched mate-notification-daemon to use libnotify instead
of libmatenotify. Don't know if that helps, but I am also now the
owner of libnotify. Looking at updating to libnotify 0.80 as well.

It was a simple switch and it seems to work (still testing).

https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-notification-daemon/commit/d263541b686f36a8f61c00eaee4d852ce5e8a766

mate-notification-daemon-1.5.2 supports libnotify >= 0.70

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-10 Thread Kevin Kofler 
Adam Williamson wrote:
> No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I
> don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really
> any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to
> own it for my aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned
> because I don't want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies
> in Fedora, and I think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.

libindicator is a dependency of libappindicator, which is very much useful 
if you want a GTK+ app to integrate properly in KDE Plasma by supporting the 
current system tray spec rather than the obsolete XEmbed-based one GTK+ 
itself implements. Sadly, the affected GTK+ apps in Fedora aren't using this 
because their Fedora maintainers are also upstream GNOME maintainers who 
hate the library.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram 

On 03/07/2013 05:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Eh. Given that Canonical now appear to be building Ubuntu OS, I have
very little interest in trying to package Unity any more.
I don't think it would make sense to package any of the bits 
individually unless you buy into their whole roadmap which includes a 
number of tightly integrated components and that probably will have 
patches across the stack.   Since they are targeting the mobile/tablet 
world, it seems the Google model is the one they have adopted which 
admittedly has worked out great for Google but I don't think Canonical 
has the same muscle to flex.   We will know in a few years how 
successful their chosen path is.  This is a watershed moment for them.


Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-07 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 04:44 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:

> Well, I'm the maintainer of bamf-qt, same reason as Adam's - 
> my try to package Unity-2d before they decided to get rid of
> QML based one and now, finally, decided to go back to the QML
> path ;-). So we will see if we could continue with the effort
> with Unity-next. And we can always revive it later in case we
> will need it.

Eh. Given that Canonical now appear to be building Ubuntu OS, I have
very little interest in trying to package Unity any more.

I expect news sites will catch this, so I won't express myself any more
forcefully than that.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-07 Thread Vít Ondruch 

Dne 7.3.2013 14:10, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:50:59AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:

Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan)

I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain?


Package spicebird (orphan)

Second thought, I've decided against this. Upstream appears to be dead
so this likely can just go away.



Heh, also I was thinking for 5 minutes if I should pick it up, but my 
conclusion was the same as your ;)


Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-07 Thread Darryl L. Pierce 
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:50:59AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan)
> 
> I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain?
> 
> > Package spicebird (orphan)

Second thought, I've decided against this. Upstream appears to be dead
so this likely can just go away.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce 
http://mcpierce.multiply.com/
"What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"


pgpB5ToB4Ymvt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-07 Thread Darryl L. Pierce 
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan)

I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain?

> Package spicebird (orphan)

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce 
http://mcpierce.multiply.com/
"What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"


pgptvdt6mDSe9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-07 Thread Jaroslav Reznik 
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Adam Williamson 
> wrote:
> > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >
> >> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?
> >
> >
> > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I
> > don't
> > immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really any
> > other
> > Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to own it
> > for my
> > aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned because I
> > don't
> > want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies in Fedora,
> > and I
> > think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.
> >
> > bamf is in a similar position, but at least _something_ -
> > gnome-pie,
> > whatever that is - requires it. So it might actually be more useful
> > for
> > someone to pick that up.
> > --
> > Adam Williamson
> > Fedora QA Community Monkey
> > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> > http://www.happyassassin.net
> >
> > --
> > devel mailing list
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
> I don't know what gnome-pie / bamf are and what they do. Gnome
> maintainers, you may want to take those?

Well, I'm the maintainer of bamf-qt, same reason as Adam's - 
my try to package Unity-2d before they decided to get rid of
QML based one and now, finally, decided to go back to the QML
path ;-). So we will see if we could continue with the effort
with Unity-next. And we can always revive it later in case we
will need it.

R.
> 
> Dan
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Johannes Lips 
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adam Williamson  wrote:

> On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>  Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?
>>
>
> No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't
> immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really any other
> Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to own it for my
> aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned because I don't
> want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies in Fedora, and I
> think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.
>
Then why not just retire it properly? I mean of course someone could step
up to package unity in fedora but then, how likely and realistic is that?
As a side note I was also wondering why so many "important" packages like
hicolor-icon-theme were orphaned and I can't recall any announcement on
-devel or -announce about that.
Johannes

>
> bamf is in a similar position, but at least _something_ - gnome-pie,
> whatever that is - requires it. So it might actually be more useful for
> someone to pick that up.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Adam Williamson  wrote:
> On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?
>
>
> No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't
> immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really any other
> Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to own it for my
> aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned because I don't
> want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies in Fedora, and I
> think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.
>
> bamf is in a similar position, but at least _something_ - gnome-pie,
> whatever that is - requires it. So it might actually be more useful for
> someone to pick that up.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

I don't know what gnome-pie / bamf are and what they do. Gnome
maintainers, you may want to take those?

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson 

On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:


Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?


No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I 
don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really 
any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to 
own it for my aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned 
because I don't want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies 
in Fedora, and I think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.


bamf is in a similar position, but at least _something_ - gnome-pie, 
whatever that is - requires it. So it might actually be more useful for 
someone to pick that up.

--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Matthias Clasen 
- Original Message -

> 
> Gnome maintainers:
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/polkit-gnome
> 
> Complete orphan. Please add yourselves (halfline, mclasen, ajax,
> mcann, whoever is interested)

We don't need polkit-gnome anymore, gnome-shell has its own polkit agent 
builtin.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Schwendt 
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:26:13 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

> > Would be good if emacs-rpm-spec-mode could be kept.

> Taking it over.

Great! Thanks.

-- 
Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc0.git15.1.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.31 0.21 0.24
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Dan Mashal  wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
>> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
>> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
>>
>> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
>> you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
>> If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before
>> we branch for Fedora 19. That is currently scheduled to happen on
>> or around March 12.
>>
>> Package HippoDraw (orphan)
>> Package PyPE (orphan)
>> Package Temperature.app (orphan)
>> Package afraid-dyndns (orphan)
>> Package alsamixer-dockapp (orphan)
>> Package aplus-fsf (fails to build)
>> Package aswvdial (orphan)
>> Package auto-nng (orphan)
>> Package bamf (orphan)
>> comaintained by: jspaleta
>> Package blazeblogger (orphan)
>> Package bouncycastle-tsp (orphan)
>> Package bzr-explorer (orphan)
>> Package c2050 (orphan)
>> Package c2070 (orphan)
>> Package canto (orphan)
>> Package certmaster (orphan)
>> comaintained by: alikins
>> Package compton (orphan)
>> Package cputnik (orphan)
>> Package dasher (orphan)
>> Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build)
>> Package eclipse-mercurial (fails to build)
>> comaintained by: overholt
>> Package em8300 (orphan)
>> Package emacs-ecb (orphan)
>> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
>> Package emacs-slime (orphan)
>> Package email2trac (fails to build)
>> Package fcron (orphan)
>> Package ganymed-ssh2 (orphan)
>> comaintained by: akurtakov
>> Package gkrellm-weather (orphan)
>> Package global (orphan)
>> Package gmyth (orphan)
>> Package gnome-mag (orphan)
>> Package griffith (orphan)
>> Package gtksourceview2-sharp (fails to build)
>> Package guimup (orphan)
>> Package haildb (orphan)
>> Package inamik-tableformatter (orphan)
>> Package javacsv (orphan)
>> Package jopt-simple (orphan)
>> Package libdrizzle (orphan)
>> Package libgnomecups (orphan)
>> Package libindicator (orphan)
>> comaintained by: jspaleta
>> Package libopensync-plugin-sunbird (orphan)
>> comaintained by: awjb
>> Package lx (orphan)
>> Package mimetic (orphan)
>> Package mingw-openjpeg (orphan)
>> comaintained by: epienbro
>> Package mlmmj (orphan)
>> Package mtpfs (orphan)
>> Package nagios-plugins-rhev (fails to build)
>> Package ncpfs (orphan)
>> Package nitrogen (orphan)
>> Package notification-daemon (orphan)
>> Package obapps (orphan)
>> Package ocaml-cmigrep (orphan)
>> Package pbm2l2030 (orphan)
>> Package pbm2l7k (orphan)
>> Package pclock (orphan)
>> Package perl-Bio-Graphics (orphan)
>> comaintained by: alexlan
>> Package perl-Fedora-Bugzilla (orphan)
>> comaintained by: mmaslano
>> Package perl-bioperl (orphan)
>> comaintained by: alexlan
>> Package perl-bioperl-run (orphan)
>> comaintained by: alexlan
>> Package pidgin-gfire (orphan)
>> Package polkit-gnome (orphan)
>> Package python-GeoIP (orphan)
>> Package python-chm (orphan)
>> Package python-drizzle (orphan)
>> Package python-wsgi-jsonrpc (orphan)
>> Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan)
>> Package spicebird (orphan)
>> Package sympy (orphan)
>> Package trac-agilo-plugin (orphan)
>> comaintained by: kevin
>> Package util-vserver (orphan)
>> Package vdr-skins (orphan)
>> Package vdr-text2skin (orphan)
>> Package vdr-wapd (orphan)
>> Package volpack (orphan)
>> Package wmSun (orphan)
>> Package wmbinclock (orphan)
>> Package wmblob (orphan)
>> Package wmcalc (orphan)
>> Package wmcore (orphan)
>> Package wmcube (orphan)
>> Package wmdrawer (orphan)
>> Package wmeyes (orphan)
>> Package wmnet (orphan)
>> Package wmpuzzle (orphan)
>> Package wmsystemtray (orphan)
>> Package wmtictactoe (orphan)
>> Package wmtop (orphan)
>> Package wmwave (orphan)
>> Package wmweather (orphan)
>> Package xml-writer (orphan)
>>
>> List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build:
>>
>> Removing: bamf
>> bamf-qt requires bamf-devel = 0.2.104-4.fc18
>> gnome-pie requires libbamf3.so.0
>> gnome-pie requires bamf3-devel = 0.2.104-4.fc18
>>
>> Removing: bouncycastle-tsp
>> itext requires bouncycastle-tsp = 1.46-6.fc19
>> itext-core requires bouncycastle-tsp = 1.46-6.fc19
>>
>> Removing: c2050
>> printer-filters requires c2050 = 0.3b-7.fc19
>>
>> Removing: c2070
>> printer-filters requires c2070 = 0.99-10.fc19
>>
>> Removing: certmaster
>> func requires certmaster = 0.28-5.fc19
>>
>> Removing: gmyth
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires gmyth-devel = 0.7.1-20.fc19
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libgmyth.so.0
>>
>> Removing: jopt-simple
>> springframework requires jopt-simple = 3.3-8.fc19
>>
>> Removing: libgnomecups
>> libgnomeprint22 requires libgnomecups-1.0.so.1
>> libgnomeprint22 requires libgnomecups-devel = 0.2.3-12.fc18
>>
>> Removing: lx
>> printer-filters requires lx = 20030328-9.fc19

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
> If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before
> we branch for Fedora 19. That is currently scheduled to happen on
> or around March 12.
>
> Package HippoDraw (orphan)
> Package PyPE (orphan)
> Package Temperature.app (orphan)
> Package afraid-dyndns (orphan)
> Package alsamixer-dockapp (orphan)
> Package aplus-fsf (fails to build)
> Package aswvdial (orphan)
> Package auto-nng (orphan)
> Package bamf (orphan)
> comaintained by: jspaleta
> Package blazeblogger (orphan)
> Package bouncycastle-tsp (orphan)
> Package bzr-explorer (orphan)
> Package c2050 (orphan)
> Package c2070 (orphan)
> Package canto (orphan)
> Package certmaster (orphan)
> comaintained by: alikins
> Package compton (orphan)
> Package cputnik (orphan)
> Package dasher (orphan)
> Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build)
> Package eclipse-mercurial (fails to build)
> comaintained by: overholt
> Package em8300 (orphan)
> Package emacs-ecb (orphan)
> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
> Package emacs-slime (orphan)
> Package email2trac (fails to build)
> Package fcron (orphan)
> Package ganymed-ssh2 (orphan)
> comaintained by: akurtakov
> Package gkrellm-weather (orphan)
> Package global (orphan)
> Package gmyth (orphan)
> Package gnome-mag (orphan)
> Package griffith (orphan)
> Package gtksourceview2-sharp (fails to build)
> Package guimup (orphan)
> Package haildb (orphan)
> Package inamik-tableformatter (orphan)
> Package javacsv (orphan)
> Package jopt-simple (orphan)
> Package libdrizzle (orphan)
> Package libgnomecups (orphan)
> Package libindicator (orphan)
> comaintained by: jspaleta
> Package libopensync-plugin-sunbird (orphan)
> comaintained by: awjb
> Package lx (orphan)
> Package mimetic (orphan)
> Package mingw-openjpeg (orphan)
> comaintained by: epienbro
> Package mlmmj (orphan)
> Package mtpfs (orphan)
> Package nagios-plugins-rhev (fails to build)
> Package ncpfs (orphan)
> Package nitrogen (orphan)
> Package notification-daemon (orphan)
> Package obapps (orphan)
> Package ocaml-cmigrep (orphan)
> Package pbm2l2030 (orphan)
> Package pbm2l7k (orphan)
> Package pclock (orphan)
> Package perl-Bio-Graphics (orphan)
> comaintained by: alexlan
> Package perl-Fedora-Bugzilla (orphan)
> comaintained by: mmaslano
> Package perl-bioperl (orphan)
> comaintained by: alexlan
> Package perl-bioperl-run (orphan)
> comaintained by: alexlan
> Package pidgin-gfire (orphan)
> Package polkit-gnome (orphan)
> Package python-GeoIP (orphan)
> Package python-chm (orphan)
> Package python-drizzle (orphan)
> Package python-wsgi-jsonrpc (orphan)
> Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan)
> Package spicebird (orphan)
> Package sympy (orphan)
> Package trac-agilo-plugin (orphan)
> comaintained by: kevin
> Package util-vserver (orphan)
> Package vdr-skins (orphan)
> Package vdr-text2skin (orphan)
> Package vdr-wapd (orphan)
> Package volpack (orphan)
> Package wmSun (orphan)
> Package wmbinclock (orphan)
> Package wmblob (orphan)
> Package wmcalc (orphan)
> Package wmcore (orphan)
> Package wmcube (orphan)
> Package wmdrawer (orphan)
> Package wmeyes (orphan)
> Package wmnet (orphan)
> Package wmpuzzle (orphan)
> Package wmsystemtray (orphan)
> Package wmtictactoe (orphan)
> Package wmtop (orphan)
> Package wmwave (orphan)
> Package wmweather (orphan)
> Package xml-writer (orphan)
>
> List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build:
>
> Removing: bamf
> bamf-qt requires bamf-devel = 0.2.104-4.fc18
> gnome-pie requires libbamf3.so.0
> gnome-pie requires bamf3-devel = 0.2.104-4.fc18
>
> Removing: bouncycastle-tsp
> itext requires bouncycastle-tsp = 1.46-6.fc19
> itext-core requires bouncycastle-tsp = 1.46-6.fc19
>
> Removing: c2050
> printer-filters requires c2050 = 0.3b-7.fc19
>
> Removing: c2070
> printer-filters requires c2070 = 0.99-10.fc19
>
> Removing: certmaster
> func requires certmaster = 0.28-5.fc19
>
> Removing: gmyth
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires gmyth-devel = 0.7.1-20.fc19
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libgmyth.so.0
>
> Removing: jopt-simple
> springframework requires jopt-simple = 3.3-8.fc19
>
> Removing: libgnomecups
> libgnomeprint22 requires libgnomecups-1.0.so.1
> libgnomeprint22 requires libgnomecups-devel = 0.2.3-12.fc18
>
> Removing: lx
> printer-filters requires lx = 20030328-9.fc19
>
> Removing: ncpfs
> medusa requires libncp.so.2.3
> medusa requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-18.fc19
> medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17)
> medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On 06/03/13 18:32, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:45:12 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> 
>> On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> 
>>> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
>> That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never
>> branched, and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been
>> provided by emacs-common for as long as I could remember.
> 
> Doesn't seem to be the case:
> 
> $ rpm -qla emacs\*|grep rpm /etc/rpm/macros.emacs 
> /usr/share/emacs/24.2/lisp/pcmpl-rpm.elc
> 
> Only with emacs-rpm-spec-mode I get macros such as
> rpm-add-changelog-entry and the real "RPM SPEC" whereas default
> Emacs without it only recognizes rpms as shell scripts[rpm].
> 
> Would be good if emacs-rpm-spec-mode could be kept.
> 
✗ rpm -qf /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/rpm-spec-mode.el
emacs-common-24.2-6.fc18.x86_64
✗ rpm -qla emacs\* | grep rpm
/etc/rpm/macros.emacs
/usr/share/emacs/24.2/lisp/pcmpl-rpm.elc
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/rpm-spec-mode.el
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/rpm-spec-mode.elc
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpm-spec-mode-init.el

Ah, I see, it's still there in Emacs 24.2 but no longer in the version
of Emacs in Rawhide. Explaining why it showed up around the time F18
was branched from Rawhide (Sep 14).

Taking it over.

- -- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRNzXlAAoJEEr1VKujapN6rA4H/RPdGRy+9drP6zVAZnXN8bIq
ty0fh8yfR/8DXi1xrw1icnHEd07T8VNZf4AKVwurPkkbezw82izf/KNG/A0kI/mS
Lhm1crSeyPU8YvPeAgZM7QrSHu2hJ4mpPg6lzS6+P2F/dYYu/XbdmXApPZpd0iAq
fSvp9KAhN0pLq4YsJIuyzRfkwdJSY/lbSVO42kIcUVkF/i1cKICliM7MlmaNrWaf
TkWZuvjDFMt8kkn3fDpqDCzW9wQV57Tj2fwBWSFeygdXLb0f1I2tw7tWG+tTMub3
8zZ0TQxZj86F8am6p6LFgb8D1pWuwAgck6kbhdCZs88eTRnDS8Fk+bGvn193k5k=
=tsZc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Schwendt 
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:45:12 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

> On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
> That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never branched,
> and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been provided by
> emacs-common for as long as I could remember.

Doesn't seem to be the case:

  $ rpm -qla emacs\*|grep rpm
  /etc/rpm/macros.emacs
  /usr/share/emacs/24.2/lisp/pcmpl-rpm.elc

Only with emacs-rpm-spec-mode I get macros such as rpm-add-changelog-entry
and the real "RPM SPEC" whereas default Emacs without it only recognizes
rpms as shell scripts[rpm].

Would be good if emacs-rpm-spec-mode could be kept.

-- 
Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc0.git15.1.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.09 0.05 0.11
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-05 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never branched,
and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been provided by
emacs-common for as long as I could remember.

> Package emacs-slime (orphan)
Taking this up.

- -- 
- -- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRNtfoAAoJEEr1VKujapN6dKEH/0GagSxmIJl8JW3o5RHFG1Qy
rRndeNxNdsTm7DYy8RWTzAPzYuC85BO3WOcobSp7fSc1KNq+s45zPRtAz9pCzZvj
OXhdvXPPd0tXg3czYqVivdajqgwL2T0+hu3qtRdGqGYB0Fn82oao+gQItQY3K5Bf
PXkkQhrKN8qwpPxcjBPlCazrqatseP3bbOgbfWq6suhLToOfofMeQggekRQxY49n
xf6PgFVX2uyVNYCGFUoAEJILwjf7xkkLAEuhInX/Tznkj3zp+Hr2s+YlmlisQCZ9
5w4va7c21e0hkVQjXMsyVRuGCS7VUTLcglJAvcPb7ZP2H8dVQBAlF72kmm1WYoM=
=/6ab
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-04 Thread Mat Booth 
On 4 March 2013 18:20, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
> If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before
> we branch for Fedora 19. That is currently scheduled to happen on
> or around March 12.
>
> Package bouncycastle-tsp (orphan)
> Package ganymed-ssh2 (orphan)
> Package jopt-simple (orphan)

I've taken these java deps.


-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-04 Thread Jerry James 
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Package sympy (orphan)

I have taken ownership of sympy.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

2013-03-04 Thread Bill Nottingham 
Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.

The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before
we branch for Fedora 19. That is currently scheduled to happen on
or around March 12.

Package HippoDraw (orphan)
Package PyPE (orphan)
Package Temperature.app (orphan)
Package afraid-dyndns (orphan)
Package alsamixer-dockapp (orphan)
Package aplus-fsf (fails to build)
Package aswvdial (orphan)
Package auto-nng (orphan)
Package bamf (orphan)
comaintained by: jspaleta
Package blazeblogger (orphan)
Package bouncycastle-tsp (orphan)
Package bzr-explorer (orphan)
Package c2050 (orphan)
Package c2070 (orphan)
Package canto (orphan)
Package certmaster (orphan)
comaintained by: alikins
Package compton (orphan)
Package cputnik (orphan)
Package dasher (orphan)
Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build)
Package eclipse-mercurial (fails to build)
comaintained by: overholt
Package em8300 (orphan)
Package emacs-ecb (orphan)
Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
Package emacs-slime (orphan)
Package email2trac (fails to build)
Package fcron (orphan)
Package ganymed-ssh2 (orphan)
comaintained by: akurtakov
Package gkrellm-weather (orphan)
Package global (orphan)
Package gmyth (orphan)
Package gnome-mag (orphan)
Package griffith (orphan)
Package gtksourceview2-sharp (fails to build)
Package guimup (orphan)
Package haildb (orphan)
Package inamik-tableformatter (orphan)
Package javacsv (orphan)
Package jopt-simple (orphan)
Package libdrizzle (orphan)
Package libgnomecups (orphan)
Package libindicator (orphan)
comaintained by: jspaleta
Package libopensync-plugin-sunbird (orphan)
comaintained by: awjb
Package lx (orphan)
Package mimetic (orphan)
Package mingw-openjpeg (orphan)
comaintained by: epienbro
Package mlmmj (orphan)
Package mtpfs (orphan)
Package nagios-plugins-rhev (fails to build)
Package ncpfs (orphan)
Package nitrogen (orphan)
Package notification-daemon (orphan)
Package obapps (orphan)
Package ocaml-cmigrep (orphan)
Package pbm2l2030 (orphan)
Package pbm2l7k (orphan)
Package pclock (orphan)
Package perl-Bio-Graphics (orphan)
comaintained by: alexlan
Package perl-Fedora-Bugzilla (orphan)
comaintained by: mmaslano
Package perl-bioperl (orphan)
comaintained by: alexlan
Package perl-bioperl-run (orphan)
comaintained by: alexlan
Package pidgin-gfire (orphan)
Package polkit-gnome (orphan)
Package python-GeoIP (orphan)
Package python-chm (orphan)
Package python-drizzle (orphan)
Package python-wsgi-jsonrpc (orphan)
Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan)
Package spicebird (orphan)
Package sympy (orphan)
Package trac-agilo-plugin (orphan)
comaintained by: kevin
Package util-vserver (orphan)
Package vdr-skins (orphan)
Package vdr-text2skin (orphan)
Package vdr-wapd (orphan)
Package volpack (orphan)
Package wmSun (orphan)
Package wmbinclock (orphan)
Package wmblob (orphan)
Package wmcalc (orphan)
Package wmcore (orphan)
Package wmcube (orphan)
Package wmdrawer (orphan)
Package wmeyes (orphan)
Package wmnet (orphan)
Package wmpuzzle (orphan)
Package wmsystemtray (orphan)
Package wmtictactoe (orphan)
Package wmtop (orphan)
Package wmwave (orphan)
Package wmweather (orphan)
Package xml-writer (orphan)

List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build:

Removing: bamf
bamf-qt requires bamf-devel = 0.2.104-4.fc18
gnome-pie requires libbamf3.so.0
gnome-pie requires bamf3-devel = 0.2.104-4.fc18

Removing: bouncycastle-tsp
itext requires bouncycastle-tsp = 1.46-6.fc19
itext-core requires bouncycastle-tsp = 1.46-6.fc19

Removing: c2050
printer-filters requires c2050 = 0.3b-7.fc19

Removing: c2070
printer-filters requires c2070 = 0.99-10.fc19

Removing: certmaster
func requires certmaster = 0.28-5.fc19

Removing: gmyth
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires gmyth-devel = 0.7.1-20.fc19
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libgmyth.so.0

Removing: jopt-simple
springframework requires jopt-simple = 3.3-8.fc19

Removing: libgnomecups
libgnomeprint22 requires libgnomecups-1.0.so.1
libgnomeprint22 requires libgnomecups-devel = 0.2.3-12.fc18

Removing: lx
printer-filters requires lx = 20030328-9.fc19

Removing: ncpfs
medusa requires libncp.so.2.3
medusa requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-18.fc19
medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17)
medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19)
medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1)

Removing: notification-daemon
gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon = 
0.7.6-2.fc19

Removing: pbm2l2030
printer-filters requires pbm2l2030 = 1.4-10.fc19

Removing: pbm2l7k
printer-filters req

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-03-03 Thread Paul Wouters 

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote:


Package openswan (orphan)


Openswan is going to be obsoleted by libreswan.
So it should be removed/dead packaged.

I am waiting for libreswan 3.1 to package it up for review into
Fedora and RHEL.

Paul

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-03-02 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:02:08PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >I applied for co-maintainer status.
> I took ownership in f17, f18 and f19. If you want to be owner in the
> future just let me know.

Sounds good. Thanks!

-- 
Matthew Miller   mat...@mattdm.org  
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-03-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III 

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:25:35 -0600,
  Bruno Wolff III  wrote:

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:46:36 -0500,
 Matthew Miller  wrote:

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:35AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

I can provide a little help.

Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :)

As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update before
F19 releases. I can handle minor changes. There are only 4 bugs
filed, and based on the summaries, they don't look too bad. It seems
to be working in rawhide right now.


Yep, works for me. Then, let's plan on the major update for F20.


I applied for co-maintainer status.


I took ownership in f17, f18 and f19. If you want to be owner in the future 
just let me know.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-28 Thread Mat Booth 
On 24 February 2013 10:19, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
> If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before
> we branch for Fedora 19. That is currently scheduled to happen on
> or around March 12.
>
> Package jaffl (fails to build)

Fixed jaffl in rawhide.

> Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build)

Will make time to fix this at the weekend.

-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-27 Thread Jon Ciesla 
spe taken.

-J

-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III 

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:46:36 -0500,
  Matthew Miller  wrote:

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:35AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

>>I can provide a little help.
>Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :)
As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update before
F19 releases. I can handle minor changes. There are only 4 bugs
filed, and based on the summaries, they don't look too bad. It seems
to be working in rawhide right now.


Yep, works for me. Then, let's plan on the major update for F20.


I applied for co-maintainer status.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-26 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:35AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>I can provide a little help.
> >Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :)
> As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update before
> F19 releases. I can handle minor changes. There are only 4 bugs
> filed, and based on the summaries, they don't look too bad. It seems
> to be working in rawhide right now.

Yep, works for me. Then, let's plan on the major update for F20.


-- 
Matthew Miller   mat...@mattdm.org  
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-26 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Pavel Simerda  wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Dan Mashal" 
>> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
>>
>> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
>> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
>> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
>> ConsoleKit and cpptest.
>
> Thanks! Do you have plans to get gpointing-device-settings working with Gnome 
> 3?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pavel
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On MATE I'm using "mousetweaks". Is there much of a  difference and a
reason as to why it's not working on Gnome 3?

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-26 Thread Pavel Simerda 
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Mashal" 
> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
> 
> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
> ConsoleKit and cpptest.

Thanks! Do you have plans to get gpointing-device-settings working with Gnome 3?

Cheers,

Pavel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kalev Lember  wrote:
> On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>
 I have taken ownership of the following packages:

 gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
 dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
 gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
 ConsoleKit and cpptest.
>>>
>>> Hi Dan, thanks for picking these up. Just to confirm: gnome-icon-theme and 
>>> gnome-backgrounds are still very much part of GNOME - so you should expect 
>>> them to be picked up by our mass builds of GNOME packages.
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>
>> No problem. You may want to pick up the rest of the gnome stuff.. i.e.
>> notification daemon. Feel to let me know if you need anything.
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> If you are not interested in the packages that are part of GNOME, I
> could volunteer to pick up gnome-icon-theme and gnome-backgrounds. Let
> me know how it works better for you.
>
> In any case, thanks for keeping an eye out for these and making sure
> they don't get dropped from Fedora!
>
> Thanks,
> Kalev
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Hi Kalev,

That was the idea, getting more involved and making sure important
packages don't get dropped. Feel free to add yourself.

I thought gnome used "gnome-notification-daemon" so I thought that one
was deprecated.

And regarding guake I will pick that up if no one else does. guake is
a great vte.

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Christian Krause 
Hi,

On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package celt071 (orphan)

I picked up celt071 (used by mumble).

> Package dbus-sharp (orphan)
>   comaintained by: chkr

I took dbus-sharp, too.

Regards,
Christian
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Kalev Lember 
On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>
>>> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
>>>
>>> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
>>> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
>>> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
>>> ConsoleKit and cpptest.
>>
>> Hi Dan, thanks for picking these up. Just to confirm: gnome-icon-theme and 
>> gnome-backgrounds are still very much part of GNOME - so you should expect 
>> them to be picked up by our mass builds of GNOME packages.
>>
>> Matthias
> 
> No problem. You may want to pick up the rest of the gnome stuff.. i.e.
> notification daemon. Feel to let me know if you need anything.

Hi Dan,

If you are not interested in the packages that are part of GNOME, I
could volunteer to pick up gnome-icon-theme and gnome-backgrounds. Let
me know how it works better for you.

In any case, thanks for keeping an eye out for these and making sure
they don't get dropped from Fedora!

Thanks,
Kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon 
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 12:35 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > uses something different, XFCE has its own,
> >> gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it
> could
> >> probably switch to one of the alternatives?
> >
> > Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification
> daemon;
> 
> It should just require desktop-notification-daemon then.

Rawhide updated and building.

For the record, Guake is pretty much dead upstream...

Pierre
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Alain Portal 
Le dimanche 24 février 2013 11:19:43, Bill Nottingham a écrit :

> Package sdcc (orphan)

> Removing: sdcc
> ktechlab requires sdcc = 3.2.0-0.fc18
> mcu8051ide requires sdcc = 3.2.0-0.fc18

I have pickep up sddc, comainteners welcome!

Regards,
Alain
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread drago01 
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> 
>> > Removing: notification-daemon
>> > clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> > gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> > guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> > notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon =
>> > 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and
>> probably Cinnamon as well)

cinamon and gnome-shell are notification-daemons (cinamon should
provide desktop-notification-daemon as well).

> uses something different, XFCE has its own,
>> gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could
>> probably switch to one of the alternatives?
>
> Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification daemon;

It should just require desktop-notification-daemon then.

> Pierre-Yves can say for sure. gnome-session looks obsolete

Yeah we should just remove the requires from gnome-session.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 24/02/13 17:19, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package stow (orphan) comaintained by: salimma
Unretired, thanks for the heads-up. The package is still up-to-date
and the mass rebuild went fine.

Regards,

- -- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRK0bMAAoJEEr1VKujapN6XYIH/RIV/GNjf8C9XzNSt7yWGFA3
wxrx8tdLoIYd5VYuKSpT5QgWac02oAUuY0bBIDmHe7LrInTpJx7TGRdq9KyBzxq6
JAlIEZxnr2MJuWkhgtYNxRUv32gzQHuXB3RLVApqKzV5swIRhP016QfGE0YV29dp
I51hDLrCnsHpOcS5czBJb/Jc3/wR57h8jaouZGzBUuiAfyXimDUl56N0kS46Rl0j
TtXWd3HpK624H6D1RlXS3Bey63MCTHrf9CSvouPBob+Q/PtoFiPCMfzwZW3k9ps1
/joiJm5m1tgxfW+Xz+M1SIu8XLi0xNsQ4PnaVfgoQrDilJc9X014pdrY5aQS21w=
=hPXv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-25 Thread Bill Nottingham 
Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said: 
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > Removing: notification-daemon
> > clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> > gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> > guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> > notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon =
> > 0.7.6-2.fc19
> Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and
> probably Cinnamon as well) uses something different, XFCE has its own,
> gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could
> probably switch to one of the alternatives?

Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification daemon;
Pierre-Yves can say for sure. gnome-session looks obsolete, and the
nodoka theme could obviously be removed with it.

Christoph may be able to speak to what LXDE could do with an alternate
notification daemon, but he's travelling at least today.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Martin Sourada
 wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> Removing: notification-daemon
>> clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon =
>> 0.7.6-2.fc19
> Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and
> probably Cinnamon as well) uses something different, XFCE has its own,
> gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could
> probably switch to one of the alternatives?
>
> Martin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



These are good questions. Can someone answer them?

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Dan Mashal 
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>
>> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
>>
>> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
>> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
>> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
>> ConsoleKit and cpptest.
>
> Hi Dan, thanks for picking these up. Just to confirm: gnome-icon-theme and 
> gnome-backgrounds are still very much part of GNOME - so you should expect 
> them to be picked up by our mass builds of GNOME packages.
>
> Matthias
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


No problem. You may want to pick up the rest of the gnome stuff.. i.e.
notification daemon. Feel to let me know if you need anything.

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Orion Poplawski 

On 02/24/2013 08:28 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100
Bill Nottingham wrote:


Removing: notification-daemon
 clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
 gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
 guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
 notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon =
0.7.6-2.fc19

Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and
probably Cinnamon as well) uses something different, XFCE has its own,
gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could
probably switch to one of the alternatives?

Martin


It doesn't look like clementine was actually using notification-daemon. 
 I dropped the BR on it.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-24 Thread Matthias Clasen 

- Original Message -
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:04:36 -0500,
>Matthew Miller  wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep
> >> >it limping
> >> >along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature
> >> >for F20?
> >> I can provide a little help.
> >
> >Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg
> >F19? :)
> 
> As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update before F19
> releases. I can handle minor changes. There are only 4 bugs filed,
> and
> based on the summaries, they don't look too bad. It seems to be
> working
> in rawhide right now.

festival is used as the speech backend by orca, so I have some interest in it 
for GNOME accessibility. In my recent testing of accessibility, it has been 
working fine. I'm willing to help festival limp along, too.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Matthias Clasen 

- Original Message -

> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
> 
> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
> ConsoleKit and cpptest.

Hi Dan, thanks for picking these up. Just to confirm: gnome-icon-theme and 
gnome-backgrounds are still very much part of GNOME - so you should expect them 
to be picked up by our mass builds of GNOME packages.

Matthias
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III 

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:04:36 -0500,
  Matthew Miller  wrote:

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

>Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping
>along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20?
I can provide a little help.


Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :)


As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update before F19 
releases. I can handle minor changes. There are only 4 bugs filed, and 
based on the summaries, they don't look too bad. It seems to be working 
in rawhide right now.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Martin Sourada 
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 
Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Removing: notification-daemon
> clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> notification-daemon-engine-nodoka requires notification-daemon =
> 0.7.6-2.fc19
Is that actually needed still? MATE has its own, gnome-shell (and
probably Cinnamon as well) uses something different, XFCE has its own,
gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it could
probably switch to one of the alternatives?

Martin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-24 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping
> >along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20?
> I can provide a little help.

Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :)


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III 

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 05:36:00 -0500,
  Matthew Miller  wrote:

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:

Package festival (orphan)


I put a lot of work into this package years ago, and would like to work on
it again, but it's big and a little scary and I reellly need to not
commit to more things right now.

There's been (somewhat miraculously) a major release and a significant minor
release since the package has been last updated. And the voices have changed
and moved (I think that's the FTB here.)

Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping
along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20?


I can provide a little help.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Kalev Lember 
On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package orca (orphan)

I have picked up orca.

-- 
Kalev

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

2013-02-24 Thread Volker Fröhlich 

On 24/02/13 11:19, Bill Nottingham wrote:

Package postgresql_autodoc (fails to build)
I just requested commit rights for postgresql_autodoc. If Devrim doesn't 
like to, I'd take care of it.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845688

Volker Fröhlich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

2013-02-24 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package festival (orphan)

I put a lot of work into this package years ago, and would like to work on
it again, but it's big and a little scary and I reellly need to not
commit to more things right now. 

There's been (somewhat miraculously) a major release and a significant minor
release since the package has been last updated. And the voices have changed
and moved (I think that's the FTB here.)

Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping
along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20?


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel