Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:15:37AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: It might be unrelated, but I've received broken dependency notifications for nginx the past two days. I've never been a maintainer or contributor to nginx. I did fork the repo in pagure, just to look at patching a bug in the epel7 branch. Is it possible that the recent re-syncing of the ACL's picked up that fork unintentionally? As far as I can see there is nothing linking you to rpms/nginx on pagure itself. Could you see if it happens again and forward me the email if so? Sure. And thanks. :) -- Todd ~~ Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:15:37AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:44:27AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > I think I found the issue. Last week we finally migrated the ACLs > > > from pkgdb to pagure but it looks like the query I used to export > > > the ACLs from pkgdb wasn't restricted to active Fedora branch, so it > > > tooks the old branch as well which ended up for you with two > > > entries: > > > rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Approved > > > rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Obsolete > > > > > > The first line added you and the second one was ignored (I wasn't > > > going to migrate obsolete ACLs) so you can guess the outcome of that > > > :) > > > > Took a little more time than I thought but I believe this is all fixed > > now. Feel free to let us know if you think otherwise. > > It might be unrelated, but I've received broken dependency notifications for > nginx the past two days. I've never been a maintainer or contributor to > nginx. I did fork the repo in pagure, just to look at patching a bug in the > epel7 branch. Is it possible that the recent re-syncing of the ACL's picked > up that fork unintentionally? As far as I can see there is nothing linking you to rpms/nginx on pagure itself. Could you see if it happens again and forward me the email if so? Thanks, Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:44:27AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I think I found the issue. Last week we finally migrated the ACLs from pkgdb to pagure but it looks like the query I used to export the ACLs from pkgdb wasn't restricted to active Fedora branch, so it tooks the old branch as well which ended up for you with two entries: rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Approved rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Obsolete The first line added you and the second one was ignored (I wasn't going to migrate obsolete ACLs) so you can guess the outcome of that :) Took a little more time than I thought but I believe this is all fixed now. Feel free to let us know if you think otherwise. It might be unrelated, but I've received broken dependency notifications for nginx the past two days. I've never been a maintainer or contributor to nginx. I did fork the repo in pagure, just to look at patching a bug in the epel7 branch. Is it possible that the recent re-syncing of the ACL's picked up that fork unintentionally? -- Todd ~~ It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to just sit there with a dumb look on your face. -- Demotivators (www.despair.com) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:44:27AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:05:40AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:34:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > > I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13. > > > > > > > > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three > > > > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems. > > > > > > You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audacity > > > but looking at pkgdb, I am indeed not quite able to say why that is. > > > > > > I'll try to find more information about this. > > > > Data migration bug. It's not only "audacity". Other ancient packages have > > been migrated from pkgdb incorrectly, too. > > I think I found the issue. > Last week we finally migrated the ACLs from pkgdb to pagure but it looks like > the query I used to export the ACLs from pkgdb wasn't restricted to active > Fedora branch, so it tooks the old branch as well which ended up for you with > two entries: > rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Approved > rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Obsolete > > The first line added you and the second one was ignored (I wasn't going to > migrate obsolete ACLs) so you can guess the outcome of that :) Took a little more time than I thought but I believe this is all fixed now. Feel free to let us know if you think otherwise. Thanks, Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:05:40AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:34:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13. > > > > > > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three > > > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems. > > > > You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audacity > > but looking at pkgdb, I am indeed not quite able to say why that is. > > > > I'll try to find more information about this. > > Data migration bug. It's not only "audacity". Other ancient packages have > been migrated from pkgdb incorrectly, too. I think I found the issue. Last week we finally migrated the ACLs from pkgdb to pagure but it looks like the query I used to export the ACLs from pkgdb wasn't restricted to active Fedora branch, so it tooks the old branch as well which ended up for you with two entries: rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Approved rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Obsolete The first line added you and the second one was ignored (I wasn't going to migrate obsolete ACLs) so you can guess the outcome of that :) I fixed the query and now have the proper data/ACL list and the good news is that it seems that the diff between the two lists isn't that big so I should be able to correct the mistake this morning. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for bringing this up :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:34:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13. > > > > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three > > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems. > > You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audacity > but looking at pkgdb, I am indeed not quite able to say why that is. > > I'll try to find more information about this. Data migration bug. It's not only "audacity". Other ancient packages have been migrated from pkgdb incorrectly, too. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:01:03PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org wrote: > > > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > On x86_64: > > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0-gtk2.so.0()(64bit) > -snip- > > Why do I get such an email? > I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13. > > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems. You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audacity but looking at pkgdb, I am indeed not quite able to say why that is. I'll try to find more information about this. Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:26:04PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 17:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org > > wrote: > > > > > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > > On x86_64: > > > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0- > > > gtk2.so.0()(64bit) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499117 That answers what's wromg with audacity, but not why unrelated people get mailed about this. -- Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on practicality. xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl-- Baron Vladimir Harkonnen ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 17:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org > wrote: > > > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > On x86_64: > > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0- > > gtk2.so.0()(64bit) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499117 Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Broken dependencies: audacity
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org wrote: > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0-gtk2.so.0()(64bit) -snip- Why do I get such an email? I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13. I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
